Abdominal cancer, nausea, and vomiting.

Nausea and vomiting in abdominal cancer is perhaps one of the most difficult symptom complexes to manage, especially when complicated by bowel obstruction. There are many mechanisms of nausea in advanced abdominal cancer with a number of therapeutic interventions that can significantly enhance symptom control and overall quality of life. As with pain, the ideal approach should include a mechanistic analysis of the causes of nausea beginning with a thorough history, followed by a directed physical examination, and selected laboratory studies. The symptom history, in conjunction with a physical examination and directed tests should direct appropriate pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. The result is often the amelioration of significant suffering and enhanced quality of living.

Advance care planning.

Advance care planning is the process of planning for future medical care, particularly for the event when the patient is unable to make his or her own decisions. It should be a routine part of standard medical care and, when possible, conducted with the proxy decision maker present. It is helpful to think of the process as a stepwise approach. The steps include the appropriate introduction of the topic, structured discussions covering potential scenarios, documentation of preferences, periodic review and update of the directives, and application of the wishes when needed. The steps can be integrated flexibly into routine clinical encounters by the physician and other members of the health care team. The process fosters personal resolution for the patient, preparedness for the proxy, and effective teamwork for the professionals. The process also has pitfalls of which to be aware. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1181-1187

Gaps in end-of-life care.

Every year, more than 1 million Americans die of different causes. Some die easily and comfortably. Others die with a great deal of suffering and distress. This article contrasts key aspects of the way Americans die with the way they say they would like to die. It will also highlight some of the barriers to providing high-quality end-of-life care. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1176-1180

The patient-physician relationship. Ensuring competency in end-of-life care: communication and relational skills.

Physician competence in end-of-life care requires skill in communication, decision making, and building relationships, yet these skills were not taught to the majority of physicians during their training. This article presents a 7-step approach for physicians for structuring communication regarding care at the end of life. Physicians should prepare for discussions by confirming medical facts and establishing an appropriate environment; establish what the patient (and family) knows by using open-ended questions; determine how information is to be handled at the beginning of the patient-physician relationship; deliver the information in a sensitive but straightforward manner; respond to emotions of the patients, parents, and families; establish goals for care and treatment priorities when possible; and establish an overall plan. These 7 steps can be used in situations such as breaking bad news, setting treatment goals, advance care planning, withholding or withdrawing therapy, making decisions in sudden life-threatening illness, resolving conflict around medical futility, responding to a request for physician-assisted suicide, and guiding patients and families through the last hours of living and early stages after death. Effective application as part of core end-of-life care competencies is likely to improve patients' and families' experiences of care. It may also enhance physicians' professional fulfillment from satisfactory relationships with their patients and patients' families.

Antisecretory agents in gastrointestinal obstruction.

Gastrointestinal obstruction is associated with nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Antisecretory agents can relieve these symptoms, even in the absence of surgical or mechanical intervention. These medical management approaches are outlined, and recommendations are made.

Physician board certification in hospice and palliative medicine.

The American Board of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (ABHPM) was formed in 1995 to establish and implement standards for certification of physicians practicing hospice and palliative medicine and, ultimately, accreditation of physician training in this discipline. The ABHPM has created a certification process that parallels other member boards of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). After 3(1/2) years and the administration of seven examinations, 623 physicians have achieved board certification in hospice and palliative medicine. Those with ABMS primary board certifications have been certified by anesthesiology, 4%; family practice, 23%; internal medicine, 55%; pediatrics, 1%; radiation oncology, 2%; and surgery, 2%. The majority describe their practice location as urban. Sixty-nine percent report more than 5 years of clinical experience in hospice/palliative medicine and 75% report an association with a hospice as medical director or hospice physician. Sixty-seven percent belong to the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Applicants were drawn from 48 states, Canada, and 3 foreign countries. The available data indicate only 20% were less than 40 years of age and that two-thirds were men. There is significant physician interest in seeking professional recognition of expertise in caring for terminally ill persons and their families through creation of a specialty in hospice and palliative medicine. Certification of physicians and accreditation of training programs are key elements in this process. This process will encourage more physicians to enter this field and provide needed expertise in the management of patients with progressive disease for whom the prognosis is limited, and the focus of care is quality of life.

Coding and reimbursement mechanisms for physician services in hospice and palliative care.

Many physicians misperceive that the current coding system used to bill third-party payers in the United States does not include codes related to hospice and palliative care. This article will help physicians and hospice and palliative care providers to: 1) understand how to code for physician services related to hospice and palliative care; 2) review the documentation required to support such services; 3) understand the differences between the reimbursement mechanisms to be used when the patient is enrolled in the Medicare Hospice Benefit, and the usual reimbursement mechanisms; and 4) understand some of the approaches for funding non-physician palliative care services for patients not enrolled in the Medicare Hospice Benefit.

Development of a teaching module for quality-of-life assessment of terminal patients. The AACE Multi-Institutional Palliative Cancer Education Section. American Association for Cancer Education.

To enhance the teaching of students to assess quality of life of patients with serious disease, the AACE Palliative Cancer Education Section has developed a teaching module. The module, which focuses on four desired learning objectives, is to be used in an hour-long small-group session. The authors describe the development of the module, as well as its objectives, teaching method, evaluation, and future challenges.

Symptom control in hospice--state of the art.

There are a myriad of physical symptoms which can complicate the care of patients with advanced disease. Without knowledge of and attention to these distressing symptoms, the rest of the work of the interdisciplinary hospice team is greatly hampered. In this article, we review the management of ten prevalent symptoms in hospice care and to identify areas of clinical investigation underway and point of future areas ripe for investigation.

Symptoms and attitudes of 100 consecutive patients admitted to an acute hospice/palliative care unit.

One hundred patients admitted to an acute hospice/palliative care unit in a U.S. teaching hospital were evaluated using a standardized data acquisition tool that assessed the presence of physical symptoms and attitudes concerning admission to such a specialty unit. Patients entering the unit between June 1995 and October 1995 completed the tool within 24 hours of admission. Symptoms reported were fatigue in 81 patients, anorexia in 70, dyspnea in 61, xerostomia in 58, cough in 52, pain in 49, confusion in 37, depression in 37, constipation in 35, nausea in 30, insomnia in 23, and vomiting in 22. Of the 59 patients and family/friends that responded to the question "How do you feel about hospice care?", 53 gave a positive response. When asked about the best aspects of the unit, the most common response related to the care the patient and family received (23 responses, 39%). We conclude that patients admitted to an acute inpatient hospice/palliative care unit have multiple symptoms and a high degree of satisfaction with the environment.

Clinical experience in hospice and palliative medicine for clinicians in practice.

Many healthcare professionals already in practice have identified their need to pursue further practical training in the provision of hospice and palliative care. We began offering a 1-week clinical experience to physicians, nurses, pharmacists, social workers, and chaplains in the summer of 1995. As of October 1,1997, there have been 190 requests for application materials from individuals in more than 22 states, as well as from Singapore and Uganda. Thirty-five individuals completed visits by October 31,1997; 17 nurses, 16 physicians, 1 psychologist, and 1 chaplain. Although all are working in areas related to palliative care, 57% (20 of 35) were not currently working for a hospice program. A 25-question examination was administered as a needs-assessment test. Overall they scored 75% correct. They did especially poorly on questions related to dosing of opioids, assessment of pain, and prognosis in AIDS. They completed a videotaped interview with a standardized patient focusing on skills in discussing a terminal prognosis, "do not resuscitate" (DNR) status, and hospice referral. They evaluated the entire educational experience with a self-report at the end of their visit using a Likert Scale with values of 1 to 5. To the statement "I achieved the specific goals which I set for myself," the average score was 4.6 (range 1-5). To the statement "The experience was worth the time and effort," the average score was 4.9. To the statement "I would recommend this experience to others," the average score was 4.9. The evaluation was repeated 6 months after the visit with similar scores. In addition, to the statement "My current efforts are helping to change the way dying patients and their families are cared for in the broader environment in which I work," the average score was 4.9 (range 4-5). We conclude that this is a successful program of clinical exposure to hospice and palliative medicine for clinicians in practice.