Treating menopausal symptoms with a complex remedy or placebo: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a complex remedy compared with placebo to treat menopausal symptoms. METHODS: A total of 102 peri- and postmenopausal women requiring treatment for menopausal symptoms were randomized to receive a complex anthroposophic remedy prepared in the homeopathic manner (Apis regina tota GL D4, Argentum metallicum D5, Ovaria bovis GL D4), 3 × 10 globuli daily (2 × 12 weeks) and placebo (12 weeks) in different orders of remedy (R) and placebo (P) (1: R/R/P, 2: P/R/R, 3: R/P/R). The primary endpoint was change in climacteric symptoms assessed by the Menopause Rating Scale II (MRS II) after 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints were changes of symptoms and safety throughout the study. RESULTS: Reduction of symptoms after 12 weeks did not differ between remedy and placebo (total score MRS II: -1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.8 to 0 vs. -2.3, 95% CI -4.4 to -0.3, p = 0.441) and had no clinical relevance (defined as reduction in MRS II ≥ -3.5). Comparison of secondary outcomes at 12 weeks between remedy and placebo or between groups after the 2nd or 3rd period compared to previous periods did not differ. Treatment with remedy for 24 consecutive weeks did not reach clinical relevance either. However, total reduction of symptoms after three periods in Group 1 (R/R/P) (-5.0, 95% CI -7.5 to -2.5) and Group 2 (P/R/R) (-5.9, 95% CI -8.7 to -3.1) reached clinical relevance whereas almost no decrease of symptoms after three periods was seen in Group 3 (R/P/R) (-0.5, 95% CI -2.9 to 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the complex remedy for 12 or 24 weeks did not result in clinically significant improvement of menopausal symptoms.

Variable expression of the Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 (FMR1) gene in patients with premature ovarian failure syndrome is not dependent on number of (CGG)n triplets in exon 1.

BACKGROUND: Increased expression of the Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 (FMR1) gene in blood cells has been claimed to be associated with variable (CGG)(n) triplet numbers in the 5' untranslated region of this gene. Increased CGG triplet numbers, including that of the so-called premutation range (n= 55-200), were shown to have a risk of <26% to impair ovarian reserve leading to primary ovarian insufficiency and premature ovarian failure (POF). METHODS: DNA and RNA samples were isolated from 74 patients with idiopathic POF to evaluate quantitatively the expression of FMR1 in leukocytes and CGG triplet number on FMR1 gene alleles. mRNA levels were normalized and compared with those of control women. Expression of the encoded protein (FMRP) was analysed by immunohistochemistry on ovarian biopsy tissue sections. RESULTS: A large variance of the FMR1 transcript level was found in the leukocyte RNA samples, but only in patients with POF, and this variability did not correlate to variance of CGG triplet numbers found on both FMR1 alleles (19 < n > 90). During normal folliculogenesis, FMRP is predominantly expressed in granulosa cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that FMR1 expression during human folliculogenesis is probably a quantitative trait. Proper function of FMRP in granulosa cells seems to depend on an optimal transcript level. All women with CGG triplet numbers outside the range associated with normal folliculogenesis (26 < n > 34) are therefore expected to have a relaxed FMR1 transcription control. FMR1 transcript levels in leukocytes might therefore be diagnostic for altered FMRP levels in granulosa cells, which will affect the process of folliculogenesis.