Once-daily treatment with saquinavir mesylate (2000 mg) and ritonavir (100 mg) together with a fixed-dose combination of abacavir/lamivudine (600/300 mg) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (245/200 mg) in HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility and pharmacokinetics of a once-daily regimen of 2000 mg saquinavir mesylate boosted with 100 mg ritonavir. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients successfully treated with 1000 mg saquinavir boosted with 100 mg ritonavir twice daily together with two nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors [N(t)RTIs] who were switched to 2000 mg saquinavir with 100 mg ritonavir once daily with unchanged N(t)RTI therapy were analysed. CD4 cells, HIV-RNA PCR and metabolic parameters were compared between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the switch. Saquinavir and ritonavir drug levels were measured before and a median of 3 weeks after switching from twice to once daily at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h after intake of the medication. The area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)) was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (16 males, median age of 41 years) with a median CD4 cell count of 464 cells/mm(3) were analysed. HIV-RNA PCR remained <500 copies/mL for all patients. After switching from 100 mg twice daily to 100 mg once daily, the AUC(0-24) for ritonavir decreased significantly [21 874 to 10 267 ng.h/mL, geometric mean ratio (GMR) = 0.47; P < 0.001], whereas the AUC(0-24) for saquinavir decreased only marginally from 35 000 to 34 490 ng.h/mL (GMR = 0.99; P = 0.426). The CD4 cell count and the fasting metabolic parameters remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily treatment with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir was well tolerated and resulted in similar saquinavir drug exposure despite much lower ritonavir concentrations when compared with a twice-daily dosing schedule.

Immune tolerance induction with mycophenolate-mofetil in two children with haemophilia B and inhibitor.

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) in haemophilia B patients with inhibitor should be carefully considered because of the relatively poor (25%) overall success rate and the high risk of complications. ITI in combination with an immunosuppressive treatment was started in two children with haemophilia B with factor IX (FIX) inhibitor. To avoid anaphylactic reactions and inhibitor boost, the FIX replacement therapy was stopped and patients received a treatment with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). After disappearance of FIX inhibitor, a combination of mycophenolate-mofetil (MMF), dexamethasone (DEXA) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and a high dose FIX replacement therapy was started. Immune tolerance could be induced in patient 2, whereas eradication of FIX inhibitor was incomplete in patient 1. Both patients benefited from the immune suppressive treatment and FIX replacement therapy was tolerated without any allergic complications. Neither development of a nephrotic syndrome nor a severe bleeding episode was observed. Strategies to induce tolerance in haemophilia B patients with inhibitors need to be explored in a systematic way. Given the low frequency of disease and even lower incidence of inhibitors, prospective randomized studies may not be possible. International registry-based retrospective and prospective data collection could play the key role in the study of the outcome variables in ITI for haemophilia B.

Dose reduction effective in alleviating symptoms of saquinavir toxicity.

Gastrointestinal intolerance is a limitation of boosted saquinavir antiretroviral treatment. We present three HIV-infected individuals whose severe toxicity symptoms started directly after initiation of a standard dose saquinavir hard-gel capsule-containing regimen (saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg). All patients underwent immediate 12 h pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment and showed extraordinarily high saquinavir plasma exposure. All three patients did not recover until the saquinavir exposure was decreased. This pilot case study anticipates a new concept of 'direct PK'-guided individual dose interventions under close viral load monitoring. Two major reasons for symptomatic saquinavir overexposure were defined: impaired liver function in a chronic hepatitis C virus co-infected individual at normal liver performance parameters and a delayed cytochrome p450 enzyme autoinduction. Overexposure seems to be an independent intolerance factor. Although delayed autoinduction is not well established as a reason for adverse events in saquinavir therapy, this observation may be confirmed in the near future by increased use.

Effect of first line therapy including efavirenz and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in HIV-infected children.

OBJECTIVE: In an intent-to-treat study, reduction of viral load, increase in CD4 cell count, clinical benefit and adverse reactions were examined in HIV-infected children receiving first line therapy including efavirenz. METHODS: The data of 10 perinatally infected children (median age: 5.8 years) were evaluated during a treatment period of 24 months. Viral load and CD4 cell count were measured every 4 - 8 weeks. Pharmacokinetic evaluations of efavirenz were performed in all patients at study onset. Adverse reactions were reported after obtaining interval history and examination. RESULTS: At base line, median CD4 cell count was 378 cells/microl (21%) and median viral load was 350,000 copies/ml (5.5 log10 copies/ml). After 24 months of treatment, the median viral load reduction was > 3.5 log10 copies/ ml and HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml was found in 8/10 children (80%). Median CD4 cell count increased to 721 cells/microl (24%) after 3 months and was maintained at a level of >1000 cells/microl (> 25%) after 24 months of treatment. Regarding efavirenz levels, C min. values ranged from 845 to 3550 ng/ml (median: 1845 ng/ml) and C max. values from 2380 to 24 200 ng/ ml (median: 3670 ng/ml). The most common adverse effect was a mild skin rash (4/10 children). CNS symptoms were recorded in one patient and no hyperlipidaemia was seen. CONCLUSION: First line therapy with efavirenz and two NRTIs was well tolerated by HIV-1 infected children and the reduction of viral load seems to be similar to single protease inhibitor-containing regimens.