Human resource management to assist infection prevention and control professionals: a scoping review.

Infection prevention and control (IPC) professionals are key intermediaries between hospital managers and frontline staff. During the novel coronavirus disease pandemic, IPC professionals faced new challenges. Unfortunately, research on human resource management (HRM) to support IPC during and between pandemics is lacking. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to elucidate the existing knowledge on HRM measures in this context and thus contribute to the pandemic preparedness of healthcare facilities. It was conducted as part of the "PREparedness and PAndemic REsponse in Germany (PREPARED)" project within the Network University Medicine (NUM), using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. PubMed was searched without time restriction until 2023 (filter: English, German). Two reviewers assessed titles/abstracts and full texts, respectively. A total of nine publications were included, eight of which were published in the USA. All publications reported survey data (quantitative: six). Measures targeting personnel development and the qualification of IPC personnel were reported in six studies, i.e., almost two-thirds of the studies, of which five focused on the tasks of IPC professionals. In contrast, management of personnel costs and remuneration systems were reported less frequently (three studies), and only regarding issues around retention, compensation and dismissal. In conclusion, research gaps include trials on implementation and effectiveness of HRM for IPC. Given the increasing shortage of IPC professionals, HRM measures during and between pandemics become more important for establishing pandemic preparedness.

Hand hygiene in intensive care units: a matter of time?

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections are a frequent threat to patient safety and cause significant disease burden. The most important single preventive measure is hand hygiene (HH). Barriers to adherence with HH recommendations include structural aspects, knowledge gaps, and organizational issues, especially a lack of time in daily routine. AIM: To determine the number of hand hygiene opportunities (HHOs), compliance rates, and time spent on hand hygiene in intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: We conducted an observational study in two ICUs to determine the average number of HHOs per patient. Documentation was based on the World Health Organization concept of 'five moments for hand hygiene'. HHOs were collected in 12 patient rooms for 12h each. FINDINGS: On average, 134 (internal ICU) and 182 (surgical ICU) HHOs per patient were observed during the 12h observation period. Overall HH compliance was 42.6%. Considering additional HHOs during the night shift, we estimated 218 (internal ICU) and 271 (surgical ICU) HHOs per patient-day. The average duration of hand disinfection was 7.6s. The time spent on HH was 8.3 (internal ICU) and 11.1 (surgical ICU) min during the day shift for each patient for all healthcare workers (nurses: 6.9min in the internal ICU and 8.3min in the surgical ICU). If nurses fully complied with guidelines, 58.2 (internal ICU) and 69.8 (surgical ICU) min would be spent on HH for each patient during the day shift. CONCLUSION: Complying with guidelines is time-consuming. Sufficient time for HH should be considered in staff planning.

Psychosocial determinants of self-reported hand hygiene behaviour: a survey comparing physicians and nurses in intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Research applying psychological behaviour change theories to hand hygiene compliance is scarce, especially for physicians. AIM: To identify psychosocial determinants of self-reported hand hygiene behaviour (HHB) of physicians and nurses in intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire that applied concepts from the Health Action Process Approach on hygienic hand disinfection was conducted in 10 ICUs and two haematopoietic stem cell transplantation units at Hannover Medical School, Germany. Self-reported compliance was operationalized as always disinfecting one's hands when given tasks associated with risk of infection. Using seven-point Likert scales, behavioural planning, maintenance self-efficacy and action control were assessed as psychological factors, and personnel and material resources, organizational problems and cooperation on the ward were assessed as perceived environmental factors. Multiple logistic regression analysis was employed. FINDINGS: In total, 307 physicians and 348 nurses participated in this study (response rates 70.9% and 63.4%, respectively). Self-reported compliance did not differ between the groups (72.4% vs 69.4%, P = 0.405). While nurses reported stronger planning, self-efficacy and action control, physicians indicated better personnel resources and cooperation on the ward (P < 0.02). Self-efficacy [odds ratio (OR) 1.4, P = 0.041], action control (OR 1.8, P < 0.001) and cooperation on the ward (OR 1.5, P = 0.036) were positively associated with HHB among physicians, but only action control was positively associated with HHB among nurses (OR 1.6, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The associations between action control (self-regulatory strategies where behaviour is evaluated continuously and automatically against guidelines) and compliance indicate that HHB is a habit in need of self-monitoring. The fact that perceived cooperation on the ward was the only environmental correlate of HHB among physicians stresses the importance of team-directed interventions.

[Compliance with hand hygiene guidelines on intensive care units at a university medical centre with surgical focus]. / Hygienische Händedesinfektion - Leitlinien-Compliance auf Intensivstationen eines Universitätsklinikums mit chirurgischem Schwerpunkt.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hand hygiene practice is one of the most effective measures to prevent healthcare-associated infections. This study examines the trends of hand hygiene compliance among physicians and nurses on the intensive care units (ICU) and hematopoetic stem cell transplantation units (HSCTU) at Hannover Medical School. An observational study via repeated cross-sectional assessments was conducted during the first 6 years of the "AKTION Saubere Hände" (ASH), i.e. the German adaptation of WHO's "Clean Care is Safer Care" campaign. METHODS: Compliance rates were directly observed in accordance with WHO definitions on the 10 ICU and two HSCTU. Overall, 13,175 hand hygiene opportunities were observed between 2008 and 2013. RESULTS: In 2008, compliance rates of physicians and nurses did not differ significantly in statistical terms (53% vs. 57%, p=0.085). Physicians' compliance improved to 64% in 2011, but declined again to 48.4% in 2013 (p < 0.001). In contrast, hand hygiene compliance among nurses had increased to 71.3% as soon as 2009 /10 (p < 0.001). Their compliance dropped to 55.8% in 2013 and thus to baseline level (p=0.444), while remaining higher than that of physicians (p=0.003). Similar trends pertained to the surgical ICU. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that during the ASH-campaign hand hygiene compliance increased initially both among physicians and nurses, albeit so far not in a sustainable fashion. This implies an increased demand for interventions which not only promote motivation, but also its translation into stable and sustained behavior in accordance with guidelines.

Excess health care costs of obesity in adults with diabetes mellitus: a claims data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Body weight management is a key factor in diabetes mellitus. However, both behavioral and pharmacological innovations to manage obesity may imply additional costs. In order to provide further insights into the role of obesity in diabetes-associated resource consumption, this study aims to estimate incremental costs of concomitant obesity in German adult patients (≥ 18 years) with different types of diabetes. METHODS: Adopting a third-party payer perspective, claims data from a German statutory sickness fund (N=1,094,496) were analyzed for costs of annual drug prescriptions and out- and inpatient care in adult beneficiaries with diabetes in 2004. Using diagnostic information, 37,570 beneficiaries with diabetes were identified. Concomitant obesity was assessed by ICD-10-codes (E66) in the claims data. Adjusting for sex, age, and micro- and macro-vascular complications, one generalized gamma regression model with the log link was performed for type 2 diabetes patients (N=24,562), type 1 diabetes patients (N=5,663), and an unclassified group (N=7,345), respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 33% of the patients with diabetes were identified as obese (type 2 diabetes: 34%, type 1 diabetes: 20%, unclassified: 38%). Affirming descriptive analyses, the generalized gamma regression models revealed that obesity is associated with significant increments in health care costs regardless of type of diabetes (type 2 diabetes: € 454, type 1 diabetes: € 812, unclassified: € 532). The interaction of obesity and macro-vascular complications was numerically stronger in type 1 than in type 2 diabetes but reached statistical significance only in type 2 diabetes (and the unclassified group). Moreover, concurrent macro- and micro-vascular complications were associated with higher incremental costs in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant obesity is independently associated with incremental health care costs in adult patients with type 2 diabetes and, even more so, type 1 diabetes. Results are discussed with respect to the fact that in this sample, concurrent micro- and macro-vascular complications were more frequent in type 1 diabetes. At any rate, in light of these health care costs, obesity seems relevant in both types of diabetes. Due to claims data limitations, it was not possible to distinguish obesity classes based on body height and weight information. Further research should identify adiposity thresholds for increased resource consumption using both primary and secondary data.

[Direct medical costs of (severe) obesity: a bottom-up assessment of over- vs. normal-weight adults in the KORA-study region (Augsburg, Germany)]. / Direkte medizinische Kosten der (starken) Adipositas: ein Bottom-up-Vergleich über- vs. normalgewichtiger Erwachsener in der KORA-Studienregion.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To estimate and compare direct medical costs of illness of German adults in different BMI-groups and different degrees of obesity. METHODS: In a sub-sample (n = 947) of the KORA-Survey S4 1999/2001, a cross-sectional health survey of the adult population in the Augsburg region (Germany; age: 25-74), visits to physicians, receipt and purchase of drugs, and inpatient days in hospital were assessed over half a year. Body mass index (BMI in kg/m(2)) was assessed anthropometrically. Respondents in normal weight (18.5 < or = BMI < 25), pre-obese (25 < or = BMI < 30), moderately obese (class 1: 30 < or = BMI < 35), and severely obese (classes 2-3: BMI > or = 35) range were compared in their costs of illness via analyses of covariance and regression analyses based on generalized linear models. Physician visits and inpatient days were evaluated as recommended by the Working Group "Methods in Health Economic Evaluation", and drugs by actual costs. Sex, age, socio-economic status (Helmert-Index), sickness fund (statutory vs. private), and place of residence (Augsburg City vs. District of Augsburg or Aichach-Friedberg) were adjusted for. RESULTS: While respondents with moderate obesity statistically did not differ significantly in their direct medical costs from those in normal weight or pre-obese range (1,080.14 euro vs. 847.60 euro and 830.59 euro; for users of care: 1,215.55 euro vs. 993.18 euro and 1,003.23 euro [all estimates adjusted and per annum]), those with severe obesity had significantly higher costs (2,572.19 euro; for users of care: 2,964.87 euro). Sub-analyses for individual parameters of health care use revealed that this pattern is largely due to inpatient days in hospital and receipt/purchase of drugs only available on prescription. CONCLUSIONS: On average, results indicate excess direct medical costs primarily in people with severe, and less with moderate obesity. In particular, they underline the need to distinguish moderate vs. severe obesity (classes 1 vs. 2-3) in health economics and health services research.

Utilization of out- and inpatient health services by obese adults: a population-based study in the Augsburg region, Germany.

The aim of this study is to compare out- and inpatient health services utilization by obese and normal weight adults. In a subsample of the KORA-Survey S4 1999/2001 in the Augsburg region, Germany (n = 947, age: 25-74 years), number of visits to general practitioners (GP) and inpatient hospital days were self-reported in three computer-aided telephone interviews (CATI) over half a year. Body mass index, based on measured body height and weight, was used to define obesity according to WHO classification. Participants, stratified in normal weight (18.5 < or = BMI < 25), preobese (25 < r = BMI < 30), obese class 1 (30 < or = BMI < 35) and obese classes 2-3 (BMI > or = 35), were compared via logistic, zero-truncated negative binomial, and multinomial models to elucidate obesity's associations with utilization at all, its frequency, and high utilization. Sex, age, social class, health insurance, and place of residence were adjusted for in all models. Respondents in obesity class 1 were more prone to report at least one visit to a GP than those normal weight (OR = 1.84, p < 0.01), while obesity classes 2-3 were associated with frequent (IRR = 1.63, p < 0.05) and high utilization (OR = 3.57, p < 0.05). Regarding days in hospital, only the extremely obese (i. e. classes 2-3) reported significantly more utilization than those normal weight (days if hospitalized at all: IRR = 3.24, p < 0.05; high utilization: OR = 5.4, p < 0.01). Sex did not play a significant role in any model. Older respondents reported more utilization in terms of GP-visits, while only tending to do so regarding inpatient utilization. Both those with statutory (vs. private) health insurance and rural (vs. urban) place of residence had higher odds to visit a GP at all. Results point to an excess utilization of out- and inpatient health services by especially extremely obese adults, and underline the need to contrast obesity classes 2-3 vs. 1 in health services utilization research.

[Health promotion by sports and physical activity: politics, behavior and infrastructures in a European comparison]. / Gesundheitsförderung durch Sport und körperliche Aktivität: Politik, Verhalten und Infrastrukturen im europäischen Vergleich.

OBJECTIVES: The focus of physical activity promotion is moving from measures to increase health-enhancing physical activity on the individual level to higher-level strategies including policy and environmental approaches. Scientific evidence, traditionally related to individual-based strategies, calls for adaptation and refinement when environmental and policy changes become more relevant. METHODS: This paper investigates differences in physical activity promotion and public policy among six European countries. Data from a European study on public health promotion policy and health behaviours (MAREPS) is analysed to study behaviour, community-based opportunities for physical activity, and populations' perception of the effectiveness of their national policies in promoting physical activity. RESULTS: Analyses show significant differences in both involvement in and perceived opportunities for physical activity among the investigated countries. Populations in Finland, Switzerland, and The Netherlands show comparably higher participation and, at the same time, perceive better opportunities for physical activity within the residential environment than people in East Germany, Belgium, and Spain. Moreover, respondents from the former group of nations report considerably greater contribution of health policy in their country to the promotion of physical activity than respondents from the latter group. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the results provide empirical support for the significance of environmental and policy approaches with regard to physical activity. Opportunities created by implementing such approaches may enable populations to develop more active lifestyles conducive to health. Further research employing longitudinal designs could be especially helpful to explore the causalities of the relationship between policy, environment and physical activity.