Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 115(3): 259-67, 2007 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17292500

ABSTRACT

An antibody ELISA test and a PCR method for identifying the risk of Salmonella contamination were compared in a field study on the same lots of animals in a slaughterhouse. The results were compared to investigations carried out on two farms with different prevalences of Salmonella antibody-positive animals. Salmonella antibody ELISA testing was carried out on all 383 meat juice samples derived from the diaphragm pillar muscle of each pig. Salmonella DNA analysis was performed by PCR technique on small intestine samples with lymph nodes from all 383 pigs, and on tonsils from the last 129 pigs. The 383 animals tested came from 32 different pig farms. Furthermore, the herd antibody blood serum status against Salmonella spp. of weaners was determined on two selected pig fattening farms, one with low and one with high seroprevalence in meat juice. A total of 7.0% (ELISA cut-off OD% > or =40) of the slaughtered pigs from 6 of 32 fattening farms were seropositive. Salmonella DNA was found in 16.4% of the jejunum/lymph nodes (383 animals) and in 15.5% of the tonsils (129 animals). Salmonella DNA was found in the jejunum/lymph nodes of 41% of the seropositive pigs. However, serotitres were also positive in only 17.5% of all pigs positive in the jejunum DNA test. Two farms were selected for further investigation: farm 13 (F13), with a high prevalence of seropositive pigs, 29.0%, Category II; and F11, with 9.4%, Category I. However, categorization according to the blood serum tests of the fattening pigs after on-farm testing was very different: F13 had 5% positive animals (Category I); and F11, 23.3% (Category II). The study led to the following results and recommendations: First, ELISA tests are useful for the detection of farms that are regularly contaminated with Salmonella, but such tests cannot give information on the infectious status of a single animal (or a group) at the point of slaughter. Second, it is crucial that management measures are taken to prevent the spread of infections by trade and transport: piglets should be supplied exclusively by a single, well-known producer, and finishers should be tested serologically on farm before going to slaughter. Third, ELISA tests and the PCR method are suitable for the detection of Salmonella and are recommended as analytical tools for all pork quality control programmes. Fourth, animals from suspicious farms should always be slaughtered at the end of the slaughter day, followed by thorough cleaning and disinfection.


Subject(s)
Abattoirs , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Swine/microbiology , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Consumer Product Safety , DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Salmonella Infections, Animal/blood , Salmonella Infections, Animal/diagnosis , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine Diseases/blood , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Swine Diseases/epidemiology
2.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 117(2): 185-91, 2007 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17011059

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to gather more information on the spread of VTEC serotypes, genetic profiles and resistance patterns from pigs or pork and from cattle or beef in different areas, and to improve detection of the source of outbreaks with a wider data pool. Of 130 Escherichia coli samples isolated from a cattle slaughter house and beef retail products in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), seven were identified as verotoxigenic (VTEC). In comparison, 22 VTEC of 264 E. coli isolates were isolated from bovine faeces (14) and beef products (8) from Germany. Furthermore 23 VTEC of 76 isolates were identified from pig carcasses (10), faeces (9) and pork products (4) from Germany. Gene detection and serotyping were carried out in our laboratory and in the National Reference Laboratory. Antimicrobial resistance was tested with the dilution method in microtitre plates. All porcine isolates belonged to serotypes thus far not associated with human disease. Bovine VTEC were either serotypes commonly associated with human diseases (O157:H7, O103:H2, O157:H-) or rare serotypes. One serotype (O96:H19) was found only in isolates from Sarajevo. Most German VTEC, especially those of porcine origin, had only vtx2 genes, whereas all Bosnian isolates had vtx1 and vtx2 genes. The eae gene was found only in "classical" VTEC serotypes. All 52 VTEC (100%) investigated were resistant to the three sulfonamides tested; porcine isolates were mainly resistant to oxytetracycline (43%) and chlortetracycline (37%), bovine isolates mainly to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ampicillin (10% each). If sulfonamide resistances are disregarded, more than half (53.8%) of porcine VTEC were multiresistant and one-fourth (25%) of German bovine isolates, but none of the Bosnian bovine isolates. The results show the considerable spread of resistances in VTEC. These results also point out the necessity of gathering data from different geographical areas in order to be able to identify typical local variations in serotypes or gene expression and thus to trace human infections more quickly to their source.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Escherichia coli/classification , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Food Contamination/analysis , Meat/microbiology , Animals , Bosnia and Herzegovina , Cattle , Colony Count, Microbial , Consumer Product Safety , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/genetics , Food Microbiology , Germany , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Phylogeny , Serotyping , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...