Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 61
Filter
1.
J Mark Access Health Policy ; 9(1): 1861804, 2020 Dec 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33456727

ABSTRACT

Background: Adjuvant treatment options have become the standard therapy for stage III and IV resectable cutaneous melanoma. Two recent studies led to the registration of dabrafenib and trametinib as targeted therapies for BRAF-mutated melanoma, and of immunotherapy with nivolumab irrespective of BRAF-mutation status. Both therapies have different spectrums of adverse events. Objective: To estimate the financial impact of side effects from the perspective of the German statutory sick funds to compare both therapeutic options and to relate the burden to the overall costs of the treatment. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Thirty-six adverse event categories for the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib ('combi treatment') and for nivolumab were extracted from the original publications of the studies named COMBI-AD and CheckMate 238. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: For all event categories a diagnosis and therapy recommendation were determined according to current national or international guidelines or from leading German textbooks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The resulting diagnostic steps, treatments, and therapies were evaluated with unit costs based on the German fee schedule for ambulatory physicians, the German G-DRG scheme, and the German drug price list. RESULTS: The number of events with nivolumab per one hundred treatments amounted to 3.8 mandatory hospitalizations, 3.5 emergency care events and 0.8 life-threatening events. For the combi treatment, the respective number of events per one hundred treatments was 2.7, 1.8, and 0.5. The overall cost burden was calculated as €899 for nivolumab and €861 for combi-treatment. CONCLUSION: The treatment of adverse events resulting from adjuvant melanoma therapy showed comparable costs for both therapies.

2.
Eur J Health Econ ; 19(6): 821-830, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28823011

ABSTRACT

The national guidelines for treatment of chronic coronary heart disease (CHD) recommend surgical coronary aortic bypass grafting (CABG) rather than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with a coronary three-vessel disease. The epidemiology of three-vessel CHD and data about the application of different revascularisation strategies raise suspicion of deviation from the guidelines in the treatment of those patients. Claims data containing records of almost 10 million patients of the largest German statutory health insurance fund (Techniker Krankenkasse) were utilised to measure adherence to the guidelines for treatment of groups of patients with one-, two-, and three-vessel CHD, respectively. The impact of age, sex, and comorbidity on each patient's revascularisation procedure was investigated as well. There was no significant difference in the rate of PCI between the groups. In conclusion, the hypothesis that patients with a coronary three-vessel disease are not always treated according to the recommendations of the national guidelines could not be disproved by this study. Finally, the results of this study suggest that the best revascularisation strategy for each patient with two- and three-vessel disease should be decided upon by an interdisciplinary discussion between both cardiologists and cardiac surgeons.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Aged , Female , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Male , Stents , Treatment Outcome
3.
Gesundheitswesen ; 78(10): 660-671, 2016 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27784123

ABSTRACT

Aim of the Study: Through the promotion of smoking cessation premature mortality can be prevented. Therefore it is necessary to provide effective and cost-effective smoking cessation interventions. In Germany the cost of pharmacological smoking cessation measures are not yet reimbursed by the statutory health insurance. The aim of this study is to present the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of already approved pharmacological smoking cessation therapies and to evaluate their quality. Method: A systematic literature research was conducted in the databases by DIMDI (Medline, Embase, etc.) in April 2013 (update April 2014). The study research was focused on studies for cost effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), varenicline and bupropion. The assessment of study quality was performed using the "Quality of Health Economic Studies" (QHES) instrument. Results: 33 Of the original 10 340 identified studies were finally included. The majority of the studies show that an additional prescription of NRT or bupropion to a medical consultation is a cost-effective strategy. In addition, in most studies varenicline is a dominant strategy compared to bupropion. Overall, the study quality was found to be very heterogeneous between 45 and 80 points (Ø 63.7 points). Conclusion: The studies show that treatment with varenicline is the most cost effective strategy followed by bupropion and the NRT. However, the studies can only be compared inadequately due to different levels of age and country-specific intervention costs.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Smoking Cessation/economics , Smoking Prevention , Smoking/economics , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Female , Germany , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Tob Induc Dis ; 14(1): 31, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27563285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a major risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). For current smokers who are diagnosed with COPD, their first treatment option is to stop smoking. Motivation is necessary for long-term smoking cessation; therefore, when designing smoking cessation programs, the patients' needs and preferences should be considered. We focused on COPD patients' experiences with existing smoking cessation programs and evaluated their preferences for the improvement of these programs. METHODS: We conducted 18 guideline-based interviews with COPD patients between April and June 2014 in Germany. Each patient with COPD, who was a current or past smoker and had made at least one attempt to quit smoking in the past 5 years, was included in the study. We audiotaped, verbatim transcribed, and evaluated the interviews, using content analysis. RESULTS: The patients had broad and different experiences with pharmaceutical, behavioral, and alternative approaches that supported or negatively influenced the smoking cessation process. Pharmaceuticals were viewed as an expensive alternative with many side effects although they helped to stop cravings for a few moments. Furthermore, the bad structure and impersonal content of the seminars for smoking cessation negatively influenced group cohesion, and therefore degrading the patients' motivation to stop smoking. Alternative methods, such as acupuncture and hypnosis were mostly ineffective in smoking cessation, but in some cases, served as motivational strategies. CONCLUSION: Negative experiences with smoking cessation were explained by the patients' lack of motivation or resolution. Other negative experiences, such as the structure of seminars for smoking cessation and the high price of pharmaceuticals should be addressed through policy changes to increase the patients' motivation to quit smoking.

5.
Gesundheitswesen ; 78(S 01): e135-e144, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27056711

ABSTRACT

Background: Guidelines have special importance in medicine, however, it is questionable to what extent these recommendations are applied in daily care, and under which conditions claims data can be used for verification of guideline adherence. Method: Advantages and limitations of claims data for verification of guidelines compliance in the therapeutic area as well as the guidelines themselves were analysed and critically assessed. To substantiate these results, claims data of a major German health insurance fund (Techniker Krankenkasse) were analysed. Results: 104 236 patients were identified. With certain limitations, claims data are useful for verifying guideline adherence; it could be shown that in pharmacotherapy the beta-adrenergic receptor blocker was used to the highest extent (70.5%). In contrast, only 56.4% of patients were treated with pure ACE inhibitors and ACE combined preparation. Conclusion: In order to validate guideline adherence by means of claims data analyses, a number of conditions relating to the database, the therapeutic area and the guidelines themselves have to be considered. Guideline recommendations, which, for example, are based on clinical data, cannot be reviewed by using claims data. Despite these limitations, claims data provide a suitable tool for reviewing selected guideline recommendations. They show that the current use of pharmacotherapy as well as clinical and diagnostic interventions might be increased in accordance with the guideline recommendations.

6.
Eur J Health Econ ; 17 Suppl 1: 79-87, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27086322

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the economic burden from a societal perspective and the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in Europe. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with JIA from Germany, Italy, Spain, France, the United Kingdom, Bulgaria, and Sweden. Data on demographic characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, informal care, labor productivity losses, and HRQOL were collected from the questionnaires completed by patients or their caregivers. HRQOL was measured with the EuroQol 5-domain (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients (67 Germany, 34 Sweden, 33 Italy, 23 United Kingdom, 4 France, and 1 Bulgaria) completed the questionnaire. Excluding Bulgarian results, due to small sample size, country-specific annual health care costs ranged from €18,913 to €36,396 (reference year: 2012). Estimated direct healthcare costs ranged from €11,068 to €22,138; direct non-healthcare costs ranged from €7837 to €14,155 and labor productivity losses ranged from €0 to €8715. Costs are also shown to differ between children and adults. The mean EQ-5D index score for JIA patients was estimated at between 0.44 and 0.88, and the mean EQ-5D visual analogue scale score was estimated at between 62 and 79. CONCLUSIONS: JIA patients incur considerable societal costs and experience substantial deterioration in HRQOL in some countries. Compared with previous studies, our results show a remarkable increase in annual healthcare costs for JIA patients. Reasons for the increase are the inclusion of non-professional caregiver costs, a wider use of biologics, and longer hospital stays.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile/economics , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Arthritis, Juvenile/psychology , Caregivers , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care/economics , Sick Leave/economics , Sickness Impact Profile , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom , Young Adult
7.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 14(4): 441-452, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27021824

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation is a challenging task with a high risk of relapse. Depending on the choice of medication and duration of therapy, the costs of using a smoking cessation aid can be high. Additionally, these costs are not covered by health insurance in Germany. Information on willingness to use (WTU) and willingness to pay (WTP) for smoking cessation aids is valuable for developing different smoking cessation strategies. OBJECTIVES: The study analyses WTU and WTP for three pharmacological smoking cessation aids (nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), bupropion and varenicline) among young and middle-aged adults in Germany and attempts to determine their major driving factors. METHODS: Two cross-sectional internet-based surveys of smokers over 18 years of age were conducted in 2014 and 2015 in Germany. Respondents were asked about smoking-related issues and WTU and WTP for each therapy. The contingent valuation method with payment cards was used to measure WTP. Descriptive statistics, logistical regression and accelerated failure-time regression models were performed. RESULTS: The total sample size is 505. Half of the respondents are willing to use NRT and one-third are willing to use bupropion and/or varenicline. WTU induces positive WTP; however, the magnitude of WTP is beneath the market price. WTU significantly increases with a higher addiction level and if smokers have previously heard about the therapy. CONCLUSION: This study indicates different points to be considered for policy development. Promotion information and improving awareness about medication aids might increase WTU, and development of monetary incentives for young smokers could create a better chance for successful smoking cessation.


Subject(s)
Bupropion/economics , Financing, Personal/economics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Smoking Cessation/economics , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/economics , Varenicline/economics , Adult , Aged , Bupropion/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors/economics , Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Financing, Personal/statistics & numerical data , Germany , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Nicotinic Agonists/economics , Nicotinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/adverse effects , Varenicline/therapeutic use , Young Adult
8.
Herz ; 41(7): 614-624, 2016 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26883900

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The German national guidelines on chronic heart failure provide treatment recommendations to physicians and reflect the current level of evidence; however, it is questionable to what extent these recommendations are applied in the routine practice and what the effect of guideline adherence on mortality is. METHODS: In this study the claims data of a major German health insurance fund collected over a period of 4 years were analyzed. Using binary logistic regression and Cox regression analyses the influence of drug prescriptions, diagnostic measures, influenza vaccination, the New York Heart Association (NYHA) status, the age and gender on mortality were examined. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 85,465 heart failure patients. Approximately 60 % of the drugs were prescribed according to the guidelines. There was a positive correlation between a higher NYHA status and mortality with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.264. Especially pharmacotherapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta blockers according to the guidelines was associated with a lower mortality rate (OR 0.448 resp. 0.444). Also patients diagnosed using echocardiography at regular intervals showed a lower risk of dying (OR 0.314). CONCLUSION: The results of this large sample could confirm the results of clinical trials that a therapy according to the guidelines has a significant impact on mortality. By analyzing the claims data evidence was found that in the treatment of heart failure patients the medical results could be improved by adherence to guideline recommendations.


Subject(s)
Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use , Echocardiography/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiology/standards , Cardiotonic Agents/standards , Echocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence/standards , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
9.
Gesundheitswesen ; 78(7): e23-9, 2016 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26695543

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Backround and Objectives: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most commonly diagnosed mental disorders in children and adolescents. The rate of persistence into adulthood varies up to 60% and shows the importance of the disease. Here we present age-stratified cost information on adult patients, as well as data on occupational therapy, medication and multimodal treatment. Furthermore, we also investigated retrospectively if methylphenidate was prescribed for adults already before its approval in 2011. METHODS: Claims data of a major German insurance fund (Techniker Krankenkasse) was available. Inclusion criteria were patients with ADHD diagnosis, either hospitalized or treated on an outpatient basis in 2006, 2007 and 2008 and insured over this period. This enabled identifying this disease as chronic. The data were analyzed as part of a control group design (1:3). Cost differences were examined as also the odds ratios for the burden of comorbidities and use of atomoxetine and methylphenidate. RESULTS: 77.9% of the identified ADHD patients were male (mean age: 16.5 years ±11.1). The mean total costs of patient treatment were € 2,032 (±4,112). The odds ratio was highest for the indication developmental disorders of scholastic skills (15.4) and differed between the sexes (female: 24.0 vs. male: 14.2). Drug prescription was higher in male than in female patients (atomoxetine: 7.2 vs. 5.9% and methylphenidate 59.1 vs. 48.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important insights into the importance of the adult ADHD collective. There were increasing resource consumption identified in adult ADHD patients. In addition, methylphenidate was used off-label for treating adults already before 2011 and its approval in 2011 provided increased certainty for physicians regarding prescription of this drug.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/economics , Central Nervous System Stimulants/economics , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Sex Distribution , Young Adult
11.
Eur J Health Econ ; 16(1): 65-72, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24390212

ABSTRACT

The financial burden for EU health systems associated with cardiovascular disease (CV) has been estimated to be nearly €110 billion in 2006, corresponding to 10% of total healthcare expenditure across EU or a mean €223 annual cost per capita. The main purpose of this study is to estimate the costs related to hypertension and the economic impact of increasing adherence to anti-hypertensive therapy in five European countries (Italy, Germany, France, Spain and England). A probabilistic prevalence-based decision tree model was developed to estimate the direct costs of CV related to hypertension (CV defined as: stroke, heart attack, heart failure) in five European countries. Our model considered adherence to hypertension treatment as a main driver of blood pressure (BP) control (BP < 140/90 mmHg). Relative risk of CV, based on controlled or uncontrolled BP group, was estimated from the Framingham Heart Study and national review data. Prevalence and cost data were estimated from national literature reviews. A national payer (NP) perspective for 10 years was considered. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed in order to evaluate uncertainty around the results (given as 95% confidence intervals). The model estimated a total of 8.6 million (1.4 in Italy, 3.3 in Germany, 1.2 in Spain, 1.8 in France and 0.9 in England) CV events related to hypertension over the 10-year time horizon. Increasing the adherence rate to anti-hypertensive therapy to 70% (baseline value is different for each country) would lead to 82,235 fewer CV events (24,058 in Italy, 7,870 in Germany, 18,870 in Spain, 24,855 in France and 6,553 in England). From the NP perspective, the direct cost associated with hypertension was estimated to be 51.3 billion (8.1 in Italy, 17.1 in Germany, 12.2 in Spain, 8.8 in France and 5.0 in England). Increasing adherence to anti-hypertensive therapy to 70% would save a total of 332 million (CI 95%: €319-346 million) from the NPs perspective. This study is the first attempt to estimate the economic impact of non-adherence amongst patients with diagnosed hypertension in Europe, using data from five European countries (Italy, France, Germany, Spain and England).


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/economics , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Blood Pressure , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Decision Trees , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Monte Carlo Method , Prevalence , State Medicine/statistics & numerical data
12.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25209683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Approximately 4 million patients with a rare disease live in Germany. The medical care of these patients is problematic because of the rarity and heterogeneity of different clinical pictures. The Federal Ministry of Health has therefore published a research report on "Measures to improve the health situation of people with rare diseases in Germany" in 2009. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to present the main recommendations of this research report and relate it to current developments in the field of medical care for people with rare diseases. METHODOLOGY: The care situation of patients with rare diseases was determined using questionnaires, expert interviews and focus group discussions with representatives of patients, service providers and stakeholders from the health institutions. RESULTS: The main range of actions that have been identified in the research report were centre and network formation, specialized forms of medical care, diagnosis and treatment, information and experience exchange, performance fees and reimbursement of the costs, guidelines and patient pathways, the research, the implementation of a National Action Alliance and the development of a National Action Plan. DISCUSSION: In March 2010 a National Action League for People with Rare Diseases (NAMSE) was founded. The NAMSE created a national plan of action for people with rare diseases for improving medical care in the field of rare diseases which was approved by the Federal Government in August 2013. Thus, two important areas of the research report have already been implemented. In a comparison of the areas of activity of the research report with those of the National Action Plan it becomes clear that priorities will be in the context of health services research in rare diseases, for example the introduction of centres of reference for rare diseases, measures to accelerate the diagnostic process and the promotion of research and information management in the future.


Subject(s)
Health Priorities/organization & administration , Models, Organizational , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Organizational Objectives , Rare Diseases/diagnosis , Rare Diseases/therapy , Germany , Humans
13.
Eur J Cancer ; 50(1): 40-9, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24011538

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) imposes a substantial health burden on patients and society. In recent years, advances in the treatment of mCRC have mainly resulted from the introduction of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs). However, the application of these MoAbs considerably increases treatment costs. The objective of this article is to review and assess the economic evidence of MoAB treatment in mCRC. A systematic literature review was conducted and cost-effectiveness (CE) as well as cost-utility-studies were identified. For this, Medline, Embase, SciSearch, Cochrane, and nine other databases were searched from 2000 through February 2013 for full-text publications. The quality of the studies was assessed via a validated assessment tool (Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES)). A total of 843 publications were screened. Of those, 15 studies involving the MoAbs bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab met all inclusion criteria. Four studies analysed the CE of first-line treatment with bevacizumab and nine the CE of cetuximab in subsequent treatment lines. Two studies dealt with the CE of panitumumab. The analysis of sequential regimes and the direct comparison of two MoABs were analysed by only one study each. The quality of the included studies was high with the exception of one study. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment with bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab is mainly considered to be not cost-effective in patients with mCRC. However, testing for Kirsten ras oncogene (KRAS) mutation prior to the treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab is found to be clearly cost-effective compared to no testing. Future research should focus on the CE of first-line treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab and studies on upcoming agents like regorafenib and aflibercept.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/economics , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/economics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans
14.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23455561

ABSTRACT

Claims data have proven useful for carrying out cost-of-illness studies. To avoid overestimating disease-related costs, only those costs that are related to a specific disease should be considered. The present study demonstrates two basic approaches for identifying disease-related costs. Using the example of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the advantages and drawbacks of expert-based approaches and those based on control groups are compared. Anonymized data from the "Techniker Krankenkasse" for 2008 were available for the study. The study population encompassed all ADHD patients and a control group that was five times bigger. Additionally, a systematic literature review was carried out on 65 relevant studies. Compared with the control group, disease-related costs were EUR 2,902 per ADHD patient on average. However, using the expert-based approach, costs were established to be EUR 923 lower. This is mainly because a comparison with an appropriate control group incorporates all costs for possible comorbidities and concomitant diseases. Both approaches have specific advantages and drawbacks, and when planning studies the respective limitations need to be considered.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/economics , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Benefits/economics , Insurance Benefits/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Claim Review , Models, Economic , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Prevalence
15.
Z Rheumatol ; 71(10): 900-7, 2012 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23052404

ABSTRACT

Methotrexate (MTX) is the most important disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and is recommended by national and international guidelines as the first choice for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recent studies reporting prescription data of MTX captured only patients who were treated by rheumatologists. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyse several aspects of the prescription of MTX based on claims data. Outpatient and inpatient diagnoses as well as prescription data was available for 9579 RA patients for the years 2005-2008. Of the patients 45% were treated exclusively with parenteral MTX, 8% were treated exclusively with oral MTX and 48% switched between both forms of application. The average weekly dosage presribed in 70% of the patients was between 10 and 25 mg. The most common DMARD combination was MTX plus leflunomide with 16%. In 16% RA patients were treated with a combination of MTX and TNF-α inhibitors. Glucocorticoids were prescribed temporarily in 81% together with MTX and supplementation with folic acid was given only in 65%. The results of this study provide important insights into the drug supply of MTX to RA patients in the German statutory health care sector. In particular, the high frequency of prescriptions of parenteral MTX and the inadequate prescription of folic acid are different from the recently published multinational recommendations of the 3E initiative for the use of MTX.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Insurance Claim Review/statistics & numerical data , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
16.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22526854

ABSTRACT

For decades, economic evaluation studies, or cost-benefit analyses (CBA), have been a tool for decision support in the use of public funds. Despite this, in the last few years, debates on the inclusion of CBAs in the German health care system have paid little attention to the findings and practical experiences of scientific research. CBAs - especially the QALY - were instead represented a priori as "unfair" and "discriminatory." Today they have virtually no meaning when it comes to allocation and pricing decisions about publicly funded health services. Of course, CBAs are based on value judgments, which have to be communicated. They can lead to allocations that violate the minimum standards of justice. Here, distributive requirements and criteria are needed and must be developed in an interdisciplinary discourse. However, a general waiver of CBA does not make decisions about the allocation of resources easier, especially since its involvement can contribute to more openness and transparency in the system. Accordingly, for Germany a dual approach is recommended: an interdisciplinary exploration of the methodological foundations of economic evaluation and a consistent application of these in healthcare decision-making.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Rationing/economics , Models, Economic , National Health Programs/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Germany
17.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22290168

ABSTRACT

In recent years, claims data analyses have become of increasing importance in several scientific disciplines in Germany. In specific research projects, it can be necessary to refine and to standardize the results by socioeconomic data. Information about graduation, social status, and occupation are provided by the German job role code for all people insured by statutory health insurance. During recent years, the working scheme has changed and new professions have appeared. Therefore, there has been a discussion about actualization and modification of the job role code. Since December 2011, an actualized job role code with an extensive set of new information is available. In addition, a new classification of professions is available in Germany which was considered in the design of the new job role code. The aim of this overview is to describe the structure of the new job role code as well as to discuss possible uses and limitations.


Subject(s)
Employment/standards , Insurance Claim Review/organization & administration , Insurance Claim Review/standards , Job Description/standards , National Health Programs/standards , Germany
18.
Pneumologie ; 65(8): 498-502, 2011 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21512972

ABSTRACT

AIM: There are only very limited data available on the costs and health-related quality of life (hrQoL) of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Germany. The aim of this review was to identify studies in the international literature regarding the costs and hrQoL of CAP. METHOD: In March 2010, a systematic literature search was performed. The acquired literature was evaluated separately for costs of illness and/or hrQoL analyses followed by a structured discussion of the findings. RESULTS: A total of 172 references was identified. Sixteen publications on the cost of illness for CAP and five publications on hrQoL met the selection criteria and were included in the present review. CONCLUSION: There are only very limited and, furthermore, outdated data available on the costs and quality of life impacts of CAP. Hence, further research is urgently needed to fill this lack of evidence.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/economics , Community-Acquired Infections/psychology , Cost of Illness , Pneumonia, Bacterial/economics , Pneumonia, Bacterial/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans
19.
Pneumologie ; 65(6): 379-87, 2011 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21370222

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and features a substantial economic burden. METHODS: This article analyses the frequency of physician contacts and commonly provided services in the outpatient care of patients with COPD in Germany. Information on characteristic health care delivery in case of patients with COPD has been further used to construct basic scenarios of outpatient resource use. RESULTS: Altogether, 34 out of 150 respiratory specialists and 55 out of 350 general practitioners participated in the survey (response rates of 22.7 and 15.7%, respectively). Results point out, that the number of commonly provided services (a) is limited to a very basic set, (b) does not differ substantially according to severity of COPD, and (c) does not substantially vary between the stable phase of the disease and the presence of exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its low level of evidence, the use of expert opinion can serve as a valuable and legitimate tool; especially when the literature does not provide any or only outdated information.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/economics , Health Resources/economics , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/economics , Referral and Consultation/economics , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Cost of Illness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease Progression , Fee Schedules , Female , General Practice/economics , General Practice/statistics & numerical data , Germany , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Pulmonary Medicine/economics , Pulmonary Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data
20.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 135(7): 281-6, 2010 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20146156

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies estimating the costs of ulcerative colitis (UC) within the German setting are limited. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to collect data on the overall costs arising from the care of patients with UC and to quantify this expenditure as incurred by the German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI). METHODS: Between March 2006 and July 2007 patients from 24 ambulatory gastroenterologist practices and two hospitals were enrolled in an internet-based database. Outpatient and inpatient visits, all procedures as well as drug usage were obtained from the collected data and evaluated from the perspective of the SHI, taking also into account statutory discounts and patients' co-payments. The year 2007 was selected as the pricing period. RESULTS: Data from 519 patients with UC were collected (gender ratio 1:1; average age 46 years). The average annual cost per UC patient to the SHI is 2,477.72 Euro, 74 % of this amount results from drug usage, 10 % from inpatient care and another 10 % from ambulatory procedures. Costs increase with the severity of the disease. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to calculate the costs caused by UC and payed by the SHI in Germany. Future research should focus on collecting longitudinal data and also on comparing the resources used in the care of patients with other inflammatory bowel diseases, such as Crohn's disease.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , National Health Programs/economics , Adult , Ambulatory Care/economics , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Costs and Cost Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Female , Financing, Personal/economics , Germany , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Utilization Review
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...