Reassessing the evolution of the 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase family suggests a possible novel function for the DXS class 3 proteins.

The methylerythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway is of paramount importance for generating plastidial isoprenoids. The first enzyme of the MEP pathway, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase (DXS), catalyzes a flux-controlling step. In plants the DXS gene family is composed of three distinct classes with non-redundant functions. Although the DXS1 and DXS2 subfamilies have been well characterized, the DXS3 subfamily has been considerably understudied. Here, we carried out in silico and functional analyses to better understand the DXS3 class. Our phylogenetic analysis showed high variation in copy number among the different DXS classes, with the apparent absence of DXS1 class in some species. We found that DXS3 subfamily emerged later than DXS1 and DXS2 and it is under less intense purifying selection. Furthermore, in the DXS3 subfamily critical amino acids positions in the thiamine pyrophosphate binding pocket are not conserved. We demonstrated that the DXS3 proteins from Arabidopsis, Maize, and Rice lack functional DXS activity. Moreover, the Arabidopsis DXS3 protein displayed distinctive sub-organellar chloroplast localization not observed in any DXS1 or DXS2 proteins. Co-expression analysis of the DXS3 from Arabidopsis showed that, unlike DXS1 and DXS2 proteins, it co-expresses with genes related to post-embryonic development and reproduction and not with primary metabolism and isoprenoid synthesis.

Understanding the function of bacterial and eukaryotic thiolases II by integrating evolutionary and functional approaches.

Acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase (EC 2.3.1.9), commonly named thiolase II, condenses two molecules of acetyl-CoA to give acetoacetyl-CoA and CoA. This enzyme acts in anabolic processes as the first step in the biosynthesis of isoprenoids and polyhydroxybutyrate in eukaryotes and bacteria, respectively. We have recently reported the evolutionary and functional equivalence of these enzymes, suggesting that thiolase II could be the rate limiting enzyme in these pathways and presented evidence indicating that this enzyme modulates the availability of reducing equivalents during abiotic stress adaptation in bacteria and plants. However, these results are not sufficient to clarify why thiolase II was evolutionary selected as a critical enzyme in the production of antioxidant compounds. Regarding this intriguing topic, we propose that thiolase II could sense changes in the acetyl-CoA/CoA ratio induced by the inhibition of the tricarboxylic acid cycle under abiotic stress. Thus, the high level of evolutionary and functional constraint of thiolase II may be due to the connection of this enzyme with an ancient and conserved metabolic route.