Comparing thoracic and abdominal subspecialists' follow-up recommendations for abdominal findings identified on chest CT.

PURPOSE: To compare thoracic and abdominal radiologists' follow-up recommendations for abdominal findings identified on chest CT. METHODS: This Institutional Review Board-exempt, retrospective study was performed at a large academic medical center with subspecialty radiology divisions. We used a combination of natural language processing and manual reviews to identify chest CT reports with and without abdominal findings that were interpreted by thoracic radiologists in 2019. Three random samples of reports were reviewed by two subspecialty trained abdominal radiologists for their agreement with thoracic radiologists' reporting: abdominal findings with follow-up recommendation (Group 1), abdominal findings without follow-up recommendation (Group 2), and no abdominal findings reported (Group 3). Primary outcome was agreement between thoracic and abdominal radiologists for the need for follow-up of abdominal findings. Secondary outcomes were agreement between subspecialists for the presence of abdominal findings and referring clinician adherence to recommendations. Fischer's exact test was used to compare proportions. RESULTS: Abdominal radiologists agreed with need for follow-up in 48.5% (16/33) of Group 1 cases and agreed follow-up was not necessary for 100% (34/34) of Group 2 cases (p < 0.001). Abdominal radiologists identified abdominal findings in 31.4% (11/35) of Group 3 cases, none of which required follow-up. Referring clinician adherence to thoracic radiologist follow-up recommendations for abdominal findings was 13/33 (39.4%). CONCLUSION: Abdominal radiologists frequently disagreed with thoracic radiologist recommendations for follow-up of abdominal findings on chest CT. Chest radiologists may consider abdominal subspecialty consultation or clinical decision support to reduce unnecessary imaging.

Clinical Manifestations Laboratory Tests Abdominal Ultrasonic Findings and In-hospital Prognosis of COVID-19 in 185 Pediatric Cases in a Tertiary Center.

BACKGROUND: Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, there is little information about the different clinical aspects of COVID-19 in children. In this study, we assessed the clinical manifestations, outcome, ultrasound, and laboratory findings of pediatric COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 185 children with definitive diagnosis of COVID-19 between 2021 and 2022. The patients' information was retrieved from hospital records. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 5.18 ± 4.55 years, and 61.1% were male. The most frequent clinical manifestation was fever (81.1%) followed by cough (31.9%), vomiting (20.0%), and diarrhea (20.0%). Mesenteric lymphadenitis was common on ultrasound and found in 60% of cases. In-hospital death was identified in 3.8% of cases. The mean length of hospital stay was 8.5 days. Mandating intensive care unit (ICU) stay was found in 19.5% and 5.9% of cases were intubated. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), lower arterial oxygen saturation, higher white blood cell (WBC) count, and higher C-reactive protein (CRP) were the main determinants of death. Lower age, respiratory distress, early onset of clinical manifestations, lower arterial oxygen saturation, lower serum hemoglobin (Hb) level, and higher CRP level could predict requiring ICU admission. CONCLUSION: We recommend close monitoring on CRP, serum Hb level, WBC count, and arterial level of oxygenation as clinical indicators for potential progression to critical illness and severe disease. Mesenteric lymphadenitis is a common sonographic finding in pediatric COVID-19 which can cause abdominal pain. Ultrasound is helpful to avoid unnecessary surgical interventions in COVID-19.

Abdominal and gastrointestinal manifestations in COVID-19 patients: Is imaging useful?

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be considered a systemic disease with a specific tropism for the vascular system, in which the alterations of the microcirculation have an important pathogenetic role. The lungs are the main organ involved in COVID-19, and severe progressive respiratory failure is the leading cause of death in the affected patients; however, many other organs can be involved with variable clinical manifestations. Concerning abdominal manifestations, the gastrointestinal tract and the hepatobiliary system are mainly affected, although the pancreas, urinary tract and spleen may also be involved. The most common gastrointestinal symptoms are loss of appetite, followed by nausea and vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain. Gastrointestinal imaging findings include bowel wall thickening, sometimes associated with hyperemia and mesenteric thickening, fluid-filled segments of the large bowel and rarely intestinal pneumatosis and ischemia. Hepatic involvement manifests as an increase in the enzymatic levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, serum bilirubin and γ-glutamyl transferase with clinical manifestations in most cases mild and transient. The most frequent radiological features are hepatic steatosis, biliary sludge and gallstones. Edematous acute pancreatitis, kidney infarct and acute kidney injury from acute tubular necrosis have been described more rarely in COVID-19. Lastly, splenic involvement is characterized by splenomegaly and by the development of solitary or multifocal splenic infarcts with classic wedge-shaped or even rounded morphology, with irregular or smooth profiles. In summary, the abdominal radiological findings of COVID-19 are nonspecific and with poor pathological correlation reported in the literature. Ultrasound and particularly computed tomography with multiphasic acquisition are the diagnostic methods mainly utilized in COVID-19 patients with abdominal clinical symptoms and signs. Although radiological signs are not specific of abdominal and gastrointestinal involvement, the diagnostic imaging modalities and in particular computed tomography are helpful for the clinician in the management, evaluation of the severity and evolution of the COVID-19 patients.

Are asymptomatic gastrointestinal findings on imaging more common in COVID-19 infection? Study to determine frequency of abdominal findings of COVID-19 infection in patients with and without abdominal symptoms and in patients with chest-only CT scans.

PURPOSE: To identify incidence of abdominal findings in COVID-19 patients with and without abdominal symptoms on various imaging modalities including chest-only CT scans and to correlate them with clinical, laboratory and chest CT findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we searched our clinical database between March 1st, 2020 and May 22nd, 2020 to identify patients who had positive real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on throat swabs for COVID-19, had availability of clinical, laboratory information and had availability of CT scan of chest or abdominal radiograph, abdominal ultrasound or CT scan within 2 weeks of the diagnosis. Abdominal imaging findings on all imaging modalities were documented. Chest CT severity score (CT-SS) was assessed in all patients. Clinical and laboratory findings were recorded from the electronic medical record. Statistical analysis was performed to determine correlation of abdominal findings with CT-SS, clinical and laboratory findings. RESULTS: Out of 264 patients with positive RT-PCR, 73 patients (38 males and 35 females; 35 African American) with mean age of 62.2 (range 21-94) years were included. The median CTSS was 13.5 (IQR 75-25 18-8). Most common finding in the abdomen on CT scans (n = 72) were in the gastrointestinal system in 13/72 patients (18.1%) with fluid-filled colon without wall thickening or pericolonic stranding (n = 12) being the most common finding. Chest-only CT (n = 49) found bowel findings in 3 patients. CTSS did not differ in terms of age, sex, race or number of comorbidities but was associated with longer duration of hospitalization (p = 0.0.0256), longer intensive care unit stay (p = 0.0263), more frequent serum lactate dehydrogenase elevation (p = 0.0120) and serum C-reactive protein elevation (p = 0.0402). No statistically significant correlation of occurrence of bowel abnormalities with CTSS, clinical or laboratory features. Deep venous thrombosis was seen in 7/72 patients (9.8%) with three patients developing pulmonary embolism CONCLUSION: Abnormal bowel is the most common finding in the abdomen in patients with COVID-19 infection, is often without abdominal symptoms and occurs independent of severity of pulmonary involvement, other clinical and laboratory features.

Hallazgos ultrasonográficos en pacientes con Dengue: revisión de la literatura / Ultrasound findings in patients with Dengue fever: literature review

Objetivo: Presentar los hallazgos ultrasonográficos abdominales y torácicos en pacientes con Dengue en comparación con la literatura. Material y métodos: Se realizaron exámenes ecográficos a 29 pacientes, 18 de sexo femenino y 11 de sexo masculino -con una media de edad de 35.6 años-, todos ellos con confirmación serológica de Dengue, internados en el Hospital Rawson de Córdoba durante el brote epidémico de enero-junio de 2009. Los hallazgos fueron comparados con los descriptos en la literatura. Resultados: Los resultados ecográficos más relevantes fueron: engrosamiento de la pared vesicular (n=7) (24%); líquido libre abdominal/pelviano (n= 9) (31%); hepatomegalia (n=5) (17%); esplenomegalia (n=4) (14%); líquido pericolecístico y derrame pleural (n=2) (7%). En el 62% de los pacientes (n=18) el estudio ecográfico resultó normal. Conclusión: La ecografía es una herramienta de utilidad para confirmar casos sospechosos de Dengue y para detectar precozmente la gravedad y progresión de la enfermedad.

Objective: To review abdominal and thoracic ultrasound findings in patients with serologically proven dengue fever and to compare them with the literature. Material and methods: Twenty-nine patients, 18 females and 11 males, mean age 35.6 years, with serologically proven dengue fever, were admitted to Hospital Rawson of Cordoba and underwent abdominal ultrasound during the epidemic outbreak between January and June 2009. Their ultrasound findings were compared with data from the literature. Results: The most relevant ultrasound findings were diffuse gallbladder wall thickening in 7 cases (24%), abdominal/ pelvic free fluid in 9 (31%), hepatomegaly in 5 (17%), splenomegaly in 4 (14%), and perivesicular fluid and pleural effusion in 2 (7%). Eighteen patients (62%) had normal abdominal ultrasound. Conclusion: Abdominal sonography is a useful diagnostic tool to detect complications in patients with suspected or serologically confirmed diagnostic of Dengue fever.