Impact of Preformed Donor-Specific Anti-HLA-Cw and Anti-HLA-DP Antibodies on Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation.

Given the risk of rejection, the presence of preformed donor specific antibodies (DSA) contraindicates transplantation in most allocation systems. However, HLA-Cw and -DP DSA escape this censorship. We performed a multicentric observational study, in which the objective was to determinate risk factors of acute antibody-mediated rejection (aABMR) in recipients transplanted with preformed isolated Cw- or DP-DSA. Between 2010 and 2019, 183 patients were transplanted with a preformed isolated Cw- or DP-DSA (92 Cw-DSA; 91 DP-DSA). At 2 years, the incidence of aABMR was 12% in the Cw-DSA group, versus 28% in the DP-DSA group. Using multivariable Cox regression model, the presence of a preformed DP-DSA was associated with an increased risk of aABMR (HR = 2.32 [1.21-4.45 (p = 0.001)]) compared with Cw-DSA. We also observed a significant association between the DSA's MFI on the day of transplant and the risk of aABMR (HR = 1.09 [1.08-1.18], p = 0.032), whatever the DSA was. Interaction term analysis found an increased risk of aABMR in the DP-DSA group compared with Cw-DSA, but only for MFI below 3,000. These results may plead for taking these antibodies into account in the allocation algorithms, in the same way as other DSA.

Efficacy of Double Membrane Filtration Immunoadsorption in Severe C1q-Binding Donor-Specific Antibody-Positive Acute Humoral Kidney Allograft Rejection: A Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is an important threat to renal allograft survival in the early transplant period and the major single cause of graft loss in the first postoperative year. Semi-selective immunoadsorption (IA) remains one of the commonly applied treatments in ABMR, reducing allo-reactive antibody load. Adding double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) to IA might enhance therapeutic efficacy by also addressing innate humoral effectors like complement factors. METHODS: Four patients with ABMR were treated with DFPP + IA. Clinical, histological, and immunological data and adverse events were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Here we present four high-risk treatment-refractory ABMR cases with C1q-binding donor-specific antibodies and histology of humoral rejection under treatment with DFPP + IA. While the earlier cases (within the first year after transplantation) showed marked reduction in ABMR severity and improvement of kidney function, the later cases did not respond accordingly. Late ABMR patient 1 stabilized, whereas late ABMR patient 2 did not respond to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the consideration of DFPP + IA as a rescue treatment option in early, severe, high-risk ABMR cases in which other treatments failed.

Acute liver failure secondary to acute antibody mediated rejection after compatible liver transplant: A case report.

BACKGROUND: The liver has traditionally been regarded as resistant to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). AMR in liver transplants is a field in its infancy compared to kidney and lung transplants. In our case we present a patient with alpha-1-antitrypsin disease who underwent ABO compatible liver transplant complicated by acute liver failure (ALF) with evidence of antibody mediated rejection on allograft biopsy and elevated serum donor-specific antibodies (DSA). This case highlights the need for further investigations and heightened awareness for timely diagnosis. CASE SUMMARY: A 56 year-old woman with alpha-1-antitrypsin disease underwent ABO compatible liver transplant from a deceased donor. The recipient MELD at the time of transplant was 28. The flow cytometric crossmatches were noted to be positive for T and B lymphocytes. The patient had an uneventful recovery postoperatively. Starting on postoperative day 5 the patient developed fevers, elevated liver function tests, distributive shock, renal failure, and hepatic encephalopathy. She went into ALF with evidence of antibody mediated rejection with portal inflammation, bile duct injury, endothelitis, and extensive centrizonal necrosis, and C4d staining on allograft biopsy and elevated DSA. Despite various interventions including plasmapheresis and immunomodulating therapy, she continued to deteriorate. She was relisted and successfully underwent liver retransplantation. CONCLUSION: This very rare case highlights AMR as the cause of ALF following liver transplant requiring retransplantation.

Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Liver Transplant Recipients with Autoimmune Liver Disease: A Clinical and Pathologic Study of 4 Cases.

Background: Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is an uncommon complication after ABO-compatible liver transplantation (LT). This case series investigated the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of acute AMR in LT recipients with autoimmune liver disease (ALD). Patients and Methods: Among 809 patients who underwent LT from January 2014 to December 2020, four ALD patients developed AMR, which was confirmed based on clinical features, histopathology of liver biopsy, donor-specific antibodies (DSA) or panel reactive antibody (PRA) level. Therapies were individualized based on clinical manifestations. Results: The incidence of acute AMR was 0.49%, and the incidence of acute AMR with ALD and non-ALD recipients was 11.1% and 0%, respectively. Three patients had strongly positive HLA class II DSA, and one patient was with the PRA class I and II sensitivities, which were >80%; complement component 4d (C4d) staining was negative in all patients. The first patient underwent re-LT, and the other three patients had good prognoses with treatments. Conclusions: ALD patients are prone to acute AMR after LT, thus should be kept vigilant against the occurrence of acute AMR.

Early acute rejection after lung transplantation mimicking viral pneumonia in the middle of COVID-19 pandemic: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: In addition to morbidity and mortality rate per se, COVID-19 outbreak leads to potential 'side effects', which are difficult to evaluate and predict. Lung transplantation is a consolidated treatment for end-stage chronic lung disease requiring significantly demanding management. Deciding whether to keep transplant programmes open during an epidemic of this size is not easy, as immunosuppressed subjects face the risk of infection and related mortality. Additionally, there is a chance for the patient's standard care process to be compromised. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report the case of a patient undergoing bilateral lung transplantation during the explosion of COVID-19 epidemic in Lombardy; he died from definite early acute antibody-mediated rejection, clinically (persistent high fever, unresponsive to treatment) and radiologically mimicking viral pneumonia but persistently negative for SARS-CoV-2. DISCUSSION: The diagnosis was difficult given this atypical presentation, confounded by global scenario. Grafts were procured from a donation after circulatory death donor in an uncontrolled setting and a donor-recipient transmission was possible. Our institute became a COVID-Hospital right during the first post-transplantation days. Radiological imaging had the same features of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of lung transplantation of the COVID-19 era in Europe. Our extremely fragile patient was COVID-19 free up to the end. Donor-recipient transmission is conceivable, but the risk should be assessed with respect to waiting list mortality. Ultimately, treating COVID-19 patients can be a resource-consuming activity but we decided to keep our centre open.

Immunoadsorption Combined with Membrane Filtration to Counteract Early Treatment-Refractory Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

INTRODUCTION: Immunoadsorption (IA) represents a therapeutic option for acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) after kidney transplantation. The addition of membrane filtration (MF) to enhance elimination of macromolecular components that potentially contribute to rejection, such as key complement component C1q and alloreactive IgM, may be an effective strategy to further improve its therapeutic efficiency. RESULTS: Here we present 4 consecutive patients with episodes of HLA donor-specific antibody-positive ABMR nonresponsive to cycles of 6-16 sessions of IA treatment. Rejection episodes were characterized by severe microvascular injury (high-grade microcirculation inflammation and/or signs of thrombotic microangiopathy) and evidence of intense complement activation in peritubular capillaries (diffuse C4d-positivity). IA combined with MF led to substantial morphologic improvement (follow-up biopsies: g + ptc and C4d scores ≤1) and stabilization of allograft function. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide evidence for an effect of combination of IA + MF in refractory early acute/active ABMR in kidney transplant recipients.

The association between human leukocyte antigen eplet mismatches, de novo donor-specific antibodies, and the risk of acute rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The longitudinal relationship between HLA class I and II eplet mismatches, de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) development, and acute rejection after transplantation in childhood is unknown. METHODS: Eplet mismatches at HLA class I and II loci were calculated retrospectively for each donor/recipient pair transplanted between 2005 and 2015 at a single Australian center. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between the number of eplet mismatches, dnDSA, and acute rejection. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 59 children (aged 0-18 years) who received their first kidney allograft and were followed for median (interquartile range) 4.5 (± 2.6) years. Overall, 32% (19/59) developed dnDSA (class I 3% (2/59), class II 14% (8/59), 15% class I and II (9/59)), and 24% (14/59) developed biopsy-proven acute rejection. Every unit increase in class I and II eplet mismatches corresponded to an increase in risk of class I (odds ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.39, p < 0.01) and class II (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11, p = 0.02) dnDSA development. Compared with recipients without dnDSA, class I and II dnDSA were associated with direction of effect towards increased risk of acute cellular rejection (class I: OR 5.87, 95% CI 0.99-34.94, p = 0.05; class II: OR 12.00, 95% CI 1.25-115.36, p = 0.03) and acute antibody-mediated rejection (class I: OR 25.67, 95% CI 3.54-186.10, p < 0.01; class II: OR 9.71, 95% CI 1.64-57.72, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing numbers of HLA class I or II eplet mismatches were associated with the development of dnDSA. Children who developed dnDSA were also more likely to develop acute rejection compared with children without dnDSA.

Lung Transplant Pathology: An Overview on Current Entities and Procedures.

Alloimmune reactions are, besides various infections, the major cause for impaired lung allograft function following transplant. Acute cellular rejection is not only a major trigger of acute allograft failure but also contributes to development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Analogous to other solid organ transplants, acute antibody-mediated rejection has become a recognized entity in lung transplant pathology. Adequate sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of alloimmune reactions in the lung can only be achieved by synoptic analysis of histopathologic, clinical, and radiological findings together with serologic and microbiologic findings.

De Novo Donor Specific Antibody and Long-Term Outcome After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The impact of de novo anti-HLA donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) which develop after long-term liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial and unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of de novo DSAs on the outcome in LT. Methods: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published until Dec 31, 2019, that reported de novo DSA outcome data (≥1 year of follow-up) after liver transplant. A literature search in the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection databases was performed. Results: Of 5,325 studies identified, 15 fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The studies which reported 2016 liver transplant recipients with de novo DSAs showed an increased complication risk, i.e. graft loss and chronic rejection (OR 3.61; 95% CI 1.94-6.71, P < 0.001; I2 58.19%), and allograft rejection alone (OR 6.43; 95% CI: 3.17-13.04; P < 0.001; I2 49.77%); they were compared to patients without de novo DSAs. The association between de novo DSAs and overall outcome failure was consistent across all subgroups and sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: Our study suggested that de novo DSAs had a significant deleterious impact on the liver transplant risk of rejection. The routine detection of de novo DSAs may be beneficial as noninvasive biomarker-guided risk stratification.

Capillary leak syndrome as a complication of antibody-mediated rejection treatment: a case report.

We report a case of capillary leak that developed during treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in a kidney transplant recipient. A 53-year-old female transplant recipient experienced an increase in serum creatinine from 1.1 to 1.8 mg/dL. Antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed by graft biopsy. She was treated with five plasmapheresis sessions (on alternate days with albumin replacement), five doses of immunoglobulin (5 g/dose at 100 mg/kg), a single dose of rituximab (500 mg), and four doses of bortezomib on days 1, 4, 7, and 10 (1.72 mg/dose at 1.3 mg/m2 body surface area). During treatment, edema, slight diarrhea, pancytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, peripheral neuropathy, and postural hypotension were noted. Despite control of liquids, she presented with edema progressing to an increase of more than 10 kg body weight. Prerenal acute graft dysfunction associated with hypotension was diagnosed on day 12, heart failure or other infectious complications being discounted. On day 13, daily hemodialysis was prescribed, and a stable volume status was reached after five hemodialysis sessions. On day 20, the patient recovered diuresis and the edema and diarrhea abated, but she remained on chronic hemodialysis. After excluding other causes of distributive shock, the diagnosis of capillary leak syndrome was based on the presence of hypotension, generalized edema, and hypoalbuminemia in the absence of significant proteinuria. The concomitant presence of diarrhea, peripheral neuropathy, and pancytopenia, suggest a possible causal role for bortezomib. Awareness by clinicians of capillary leak syndrome associated with bortezomib-based treatment of AMR is paramount, despite its rarity.

Rituximab in the treatment of refractory late acute antibody-mediated rejection: Our initial experience.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is not uncommon after renal transplantation and is harder to handle compared to cell-mediated rejection. When refractory to conventional therapies, rituximab is an attractive option. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of rituximab in refractory late acute AMR. This is a retrospective study involving nine renal transplant recipients. Four doses of rituximab were administered at weekly interval for 4 weeks, at a dose of 375 mg/m2. The mean age of patients was 35.3 ± 7.38 years. The median period between transplantation and graft dysfunction was 30 ± 20 months. Mean serum creatinine at the time of discharge after transplantation and at the time of acute AMR diagnosis was 1.14 ± 0.19 mg/dl and 2.26 ± 0.57 mg/dl, respectively. After standard therapy, it was 2.68 ± 0.62 mg/dl. One patient died of Pseudomonas sepsis and three patients progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Four biopsies showed significant plasma cell infiltrations. Mean serum creatinine among non-ESRD patients at the end of 1 year progressed from 2.3 ± 0.4 to 3.8 ± 1.2 mg/dl (P value 0.04). eGFR prior to therapy and at the end of 1 year were 34.4 ± 6.18 and 20.8 ± 7.69 ml/min (P value 0.04), respectively. Only one patient showed improvement in graft function in whom donor-specific antibody (DSA) titers showed significant improvement. Rituximab may not be effective in late acute AMR unlike in early acute AMR. Monitoring of DSA has a prognostic role in these patients and plasma cell rich rejection is associated with poor prognosis.

Unusual case of tacrolimus vascular toxicity after deceased donor renal transplantation.

We report a case of tacrolimus vascular toxicity found on a protocol biopsy shortly after a deceased donor renal transplantation. The patient was immunologically high-risk and acute antibody-mediated rejection during post-transplant dialysis phase was suspected on the protocol biopsy. Although the patient was stable after treatment of rejection, a further examination showed a very rare but specific side-effect of tacrolimus. It is sometimes difficult to make a differential diagnosis during postoperative dialysis period among AMR, primary non-functioning, drug toxicity, infection or just prolonged recovery from the damage of a long agonal phase on the non-heart beating donor. Although the possibilities of coexistence of rejection or other causes such as infection have not been completely excluded, it is important to be aware of this unusual side effect of tacrolimus.

Subclinical antibody-mediated rejection due to anti-human-leukocyte-antigen-DR53 antibody accompanied by plasma cell-rich acute rejection in a patient with cadaveric kidney transplantation.

A 56-year-old man who had undergone cadaveric kidney transplantation 21 months earlier was admitted to our hospital for a protocol biopsy; he had a serum creatinine level of 1.2 mg/dL and no proteinuria. Histological features showed two distinct entities: (i) inflammatory cell infiltration, in the glomerular and peritubular capillaries and (ii) focal, aggressive tubulointerstitial inflammatory cell infiltration, predominantly plasma cells, with mild tubulitis (Banff 13 classification: i2, t1, g2, ptc2, v0, ci1, ct1, cg0, cv0). Immunohistological studies showed mildly positive C4d immunoreactivity in the peritubular capillaries. The patient had donor specific antibody to human-leucocyte-antigen-DR53. We diagnosed him with subclinical antibody-mediated rejection accompanied by plasma cell-rich acute rejection. Both antibody-mediated rejection due to anti- human-leucocyte-antigen -DR53 antibodies and plasma cell-rich acute rejection are known to be refractory and have a poor prognosis. Thus, we started plasma exchange with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab for the former and 3 days of consecutive steroid pulse therapy for the latter. Three months after treatment, a follow-up allograft biopsy showed excellent responses to treatment for both histological features. This case report considers the importance of an early diagnosis and appropriate intervention for subclinical antibody-mediated rejection due to donor specific antibody to human-leucocyte-antigen-DR53 and plasma cell-rich acute rejection.

Acute antibody-mediated rejection after intestinal transplantation.

AIM: To investigate the incidence, risk factors and clinical outcomes of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) after intestinal transplantation (ITx). METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis was performed to identify cases of acute ABMR after ITx, based on the presence of donor-specific antibody (DSA), acute tissue damage, C4d deposition, and allograft dysfunction. RESULTS: Acute ABMR was identified in 18 (10.3%) out of 175 intestinal allografts with an average occurrence of 10 d (range, 4-162) after ITx. All acute ABMR cases were presensitized to donor human leukocyte antigens class I and/or II antigens with a detectable DSA. A positive cross-match was seen in 14 (77.8%) cases and twelve of 18 patients (66.7%) produced newly-formed DSA following ITx. Histological characteristics of acute ABMR include endothelial C4d deposits, interstitial hemorrhage, and severe congestion with focal fibrin thrombin in the lamina propria capillaries. Multivariate analysis identified a liver-free graft and high level of panel reactive antibody as a significant independent risk factor. Despite initial improvement after therapy, eleven recipients (61.1%) lost transplant secondary to rejection. Of those, 9 (50%) underwent graft removal and 4 (22.2%) received second transplantation following acute ABMR. At an average follow-up of 32.3 mo (range, 13.3-76.4), 8 (44.4%) recipients died. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that acute ABMR is an important cause of intestine graft dysfunction, particularly in a liver-exclusive graft and survivors are at an increased risk of developing refractory acute rejection and chronic rejection. More effective strategies to prevent and manage acute ABMR are needed to improve outcomes.

Compartment-specific expression of natural killer cell markers in renal transplantation: immune profile in acute rejection.

Natural killer (NK) cells have been implicated in graft dysfunction. Here, we formulated hypothesis that distinct patterns of expression NK cells markers correlated with acute rejection in kidney transplantation. Therefore, we studied the pattern of NK cell markers CD56, CD57, and CD16 in different compartments of biopsies obtained from recipients diagnosed with acute graft rejection, with or without donor-specific antibodies (DSA). DSA-negative biopsies-from patients with acute T-cell mediated rejection (aTCMR) had an increased expression of CD56+ and CD57+ cells (P = 0.004 and P = 0.001) in the interstitial compartment in comparison with DSA-positive biopsies from patients acute antibody-mediated rejection (aABMR) with (aABMR C4d+) and without C4d deposition (aABMR C4d-). CD16+ cells was increased (P = 0.03) in the glomerular compartment in DSA-positive biopsies. We assume that CD16+ expression and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in microvascular injury can be associated with aABMR. IFN-γ release from cytoplasmic granules of NK cell could be associated with aTCMR. Our findings suggest that NK cells need to be carefully evaluated because variations in NK cell marker expression might imply the involvement of different immune system pathways in graft rejection.

Clinical significance of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies in liver transplantation.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) caused by donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) is widely accepted to be a risk factor for decreased graft survival after kidney transplantation. This entity also plays a pathogenic role in other solid organ transplants as it appears to be an increasingly common cause of heart graft dysfunction and an emerging issue in lung transplantation. In contrast, the liver appears relatively resistant to DSA-mediated injury. This "immune-tolerance" liver property has been sustained by a low rate of liver graft loss in patients with preformed DSA and by the intrinsic liver characteristics that favor the absorption and elimination of DSA; however, alloantibody-mediated adverse consequences are increasingly being recognized, and several cases of acute AMR after ABO-compatible liver transplant (LT) have been reported. Furthermore, the availability of new solid-phase assays, allowing the detection of low titers of DSA and the refinement of objective diagnostic criteria for AMR in solid organ transplants and particularly in LT, have improved the recognition and management of this entity. A cost-effective strategy of DSA monitoring, avoidance of class II human leukocyte antigen mismatching, judicious immunosuppression attached to a higher level of clinical suspicion of AMR, particularly in cases unresponsive to conventional anti-rejection therapy, can allow a rational approach to this threat.

Successful treatment of severe acute antibody-mediated rejection of renal allografts with bortezomib--a report of two pediatric cases.

aAMR in renal allografts is uncommon and remains a challenge as it is often refractory to treatment modalities. Aggressive therapy is essential to reverse the rejection as it results in renal allograft loss in approximately 27-40% of cases. There are anecdotal case reports of use of bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor in the treatment of resistant AMR cases in solid organ transplant recipients; however, the experience is limited. We herein report successful reversal of resistant aAMR in two pediatric patients with bortezomib. Patients were initially treated with IV methylprednisolone pulse therapy with IVIG and PP three times weekly for a total of 10 treatments. After the standard therapy used at our institution persistence of DSA associated with graft dysfunction prompted the use of bortezomib to further treat the rejection. We did not have any neurologic side effects, but one patient did experience significant infections after bortezomib infusions requiring prolonged antimicrobial therapy. The long-term outcome of both children was excellent with preservation of normal renal function and persistent reduction in DSA titers.

Probable C4d-negative accelerated acute antibody-mediated rejection due to non-HLA antibodies.

We report a case of probable C4d-negative accelerated acute antibody-mediated rejection due to non-HLA antibodies. A 44 year-old male was admitted to our hospital for a kidney transplant. The donor, his wife, was an ABO minor mismatch (blood type O to A) and had Gitelman syndrome. Graft function was delayed; his serum creatinine level was 10.1 mg/dL at 3 days after transplantation. Open biopsy was performed immediately; no venous thrombosis was observed during surgery. Histology revealed moderate peritubular capillaritis and mild glomerulitis without C4d immunoreactivity. Flow cytometric crossmatching was positive, but no panel-reactive antibodies against HLA or donor-specific antibodies (DSAbs) to major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA) were detected. Taken together, we diagnosed him with probable C4d-negative accelerated antibody-mediated rejection due to non-HLA, non-MICA antibodies, the patient was treated with steroid pulse therapy (methylprednisolone 500 mg/day for 3 days), plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin (40 g/body), and rituximab (200 mg/body) were performed. Biopsy at 58 days after transplantation, at which time S-Cr levels were 1.56 mg/dL, found no evidence of rejection. This case, presented with a review of relevant literature, demonstrates that probable C4d-negative accelerated acute AMR can result from non-HLA antibodies.

Acute T cell-mediated rejection accompanied by C4d-negative acute antibody-mediated rejection and cell debris in tubulus: A case report.

Herein, we report a complicated case of acute T-cell-mediated rejection (ACR) accompanied by C4d-negative acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and cell debris in tubulus. A 32 year-old male was admitted for an episode biopsy with a serum creatinine (S-Cr) level of 1.83 mg/dL and pyuria (20-29 white blood cells per high power field) 49 days following kidney transplantation. Histological features included three distinct entities, mainly, in one of the three specimens: 1) focal aggressive tubulointerstitial inflammatory cell infiltration with moderate tubulitis, 2) inflammatory cell infiltration in peritubular capillaries (including neutrophils) and glomerular capillaries, and 3) cell debris consisting mainly of neutrophils in tubulus. Laboratory examination revealed evidence of non-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies. However, urinary culture and gram staining were negative. Considering both the histological and laboratory findings, the patient was diagnosed with ACR accompanied by C4d-negative AMR and suspicion of a urinary tract infection (UTI). The patient was treated for three consecutive days with steroid pulse therapy. The patient's S-Cr level decreased to ~1.5 mg/dL following treatment and did not increase thereafter. A second biopsy 133 days following kidney transplantation showed an excellent response to treatment and revealed no evidence of rejection. This case report demonstrates the difficulty in the diagnosis of, and therapy for, the complicated pathological findings of ACR, AMR and suspicion of a UTI.