Comparison of postoperative survival between early-onset and late-onset adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The prognosis of early-onset adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains unclear. This research aimed at comparing the prognosis between early-onset and late-onset AEGs. METHODS: We extracted eligible patients with surgically resected, pathologically confirmed, nonmetastatic AEG from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2015. The cutoff age of early-onset AEG was set at ≤50 years old. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis as well as competing risk model were adopted for comparing overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between early-onset and late-onset AEGs. In addition, multiple imputation and propensity score matching (PSM) were also carried out for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In total, 4610 eligible AEG patients were collected in this study, including 610 early-onset AEGs and 4000 late-onset AEGs. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed significantly better survival in early-onset AEGs than late-onset AEGs. After interpolating missing data by multiple imputation, multivariate Cox regression analysis similarly showed better OS and CSS in early-onset AEGs. By using PSM analysis at a ratio of 1:1, we matched 610 early-onset AEG patients with 610 late-onset AEG patients. After PSM, univariate Cox regression model still revealed favorable prognosis in early-onset AEGs. Similar results were confirmed by performing PSM analysis at a ratio of 1:2 and 1:3. In addition, competing risk model demonstrated significantly lower cancer-specific death in early-onset AEGs compared to late-onset AEGs before and after matching. CONCLUSION: By applying several effective sensitivity analyses, we reported significantly favorable OS and CSS in early-onset AEGs compared to late-onset AEGs.

Clinical significance of systemic inflammation response index and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and upper gastric cancer.

Background: Tumor immunity plays an important role in assessing the tumor progression. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of combined systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) of gastroesophageal junction cancer (AEG) and upper gastric cancer (UGC) patients. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients from 2003 to 2014 were divided into training and validation sets. The prognostic accuracy of each variable was compared using time-independent ROC analysis. The scoring system was calculated by cut-off values of SIRI and PLR in 5-year. Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank tests were used to analyze overall survival (OS). Chi-square test was used to analyze the association between clinical characteristics and the scoring system. Univariate and multivariate analyses based on the competitive risk regression model were used to analyze independent predictors of death due to AGC and UGC. R software was used to construct the Nomogram model of risk assessment. Results: Patients with SIRI-PLR = 2 had worse survival time than those with 0 and 1 (P < 0.001) and more suitable for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.002). High PLR patients were more suitable for proximal gastrectomy (P = 0.049). SIRI-PLR were independent predictors in training set (P < 0.001), which could be combined with age, pTNM stage and postoperative chemotherapy to construct Nomogram for predicting OS. Conclusions: Preoperative SIRI-PLR score was an independent predictor for patients with AEG and UGC. The Nomogram model constructed by age, SIRI-PLR, pTNM stage and postoperative chemotherapy can correctly predict the prognosis of patients.

Histology Shift in Esophageal Cancer Between Biopsies and Resections After Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Pilot Study.

Preoperative neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection is the mainstay treatment for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. We recently observed the histology shift from predominant esophageal adenocarcinoma in the biopsy to neuroendocrine neoplasm with or without adenocarcinoma in the post-treatment resection. The underlying mechanism of this finding is uncertain, and there is limited information in the literature. A total of 11 patients were identified: 10 patients received presurgical chemoradiation and 1 with chemotherapy. All biopsies were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. When neuroendocrine immunomarkers were retrospectively performed on 5 biopsies, 2 showed focal positivity, although the classic neuroendocrine morphology was not readily appreciated. All resections contained neuroendocrine neoplasm, including 8 of well-differentiated type and 3 of neuroendocrine carcinomas. Two post-treatment esophagectomies consisted of neuroendocrine neoplasm only without residual adenocarcinoma. Upon follow-up, 8 patients died of the disease (median survival = 26 months), and 3 patients were alive after a median follow-up of 14 months. The overall median survival time was better than the reported esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (15 months). The 5-year observed survival rate was 11.3%, which was lower than the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 5-year survival rate of adenocarcinoma (21.8%). We reported a small series of esophageal adenocarcinoma that showed histology shift between biopsy and esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Our limited data suggest that prognosis of this group is different than the conventional adenocarcinoma. Awareness of this morphological change reminds pathologists to examine the biopsy specimens thoroughly, because recognition of neuroendocrine neoplasm, especially high-grade neuroendocrine component, might potentially affect pre- and post-surgical regimens.

Can Clinical Stage in the 8th Edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM Classification Stratify the Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Curative Surgery for Siewert Type II/III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction?

BACKGROUND/AIM: Clinical staging in the eighth edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification (TNM8) is reported to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. However, there have been no reports on using the TNM8 for prognostic stratification of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). This study aimed to investigate whether it was possible to stratify the prognosis of patients who underwent curative surgery for Siewert type II/III AEG according to the TNM8 clinical stage (cStage). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included patients with Siewert type II/III AEG who underwent curative surgery between 2000 and 2019 at Kanagawa Cancer Center. Those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We investigated the survival of patients with AEG of each TNM8 cStage. RESULTS: This study included 138 patients, among whom 102 (74%) had Siewert type II and 36 (26%) had Siewert type III AEG. A total of 50, 38, 43, and seven patients were classified with cStage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The median duration of follow-up of the survivors was 54.7 months. The 5-year overall survival rate of the entire cohort was 65.8%, whereas for patients with cStage I, II, III and IV was 81.6%, 69.0%, 54.3% and 14.3%, respectively. The hazard ratio with reference to cStage I was 1.83, 3.07, and 8.13 for cStage I, III, and IV, respectively, increasing in a stepwise manner. CONCLUSION: TNM8 Clinical staging is able to stratify the prognosis of patients with Siewert type II/III AEG.

Exploration and optimization of surgical techniques for laparoscopic transhiatal lower mediastinal lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: A prospective IDEAL 2a study with qualitative design.

Objective: To explore the change and feasibility of surgical techniques of laparoscopic transhiatal (TH)-lower mediastinal lymph node dissection (LMLND) for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) according to Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term follow-up (IDEAL) 2a standards. Methods: Patients diagnosed with AEG who underwent laparoscopic TH-LMLND were prospectively included from April 14, 2020, to March 26, 2021. Clinical and pathological information as well as surgical outcomes were quantitatively analyzed. Semistructured interviews with the surgeon after each operation were qualitatively analyzed. Results: Thirty-five patients were included. There were no cases of transition to open surgery, but three cases involved combination with transthoracic surgery. In qualitative analysis, 108 items under three main themes were detected: explosion, dissection, and reconstruction. Revised instruction was subsequently designed according to the change in surgical technique and the cognitive process behind it. Three patients had anastomotic leaks postoperatively, with one classified as Clavien-Dindo IIIa. Conclusions: The surgical technique of laparoscopic TH-LMLND is stable and feasible; further IDEAL 2b research is warranted.

Utility of robotic surgery for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: transhiatal robotic versus laparoscopic approach.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery (RS) has been rapidly adopted for gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). However, the utility of RS for Siewert type II/III AEG remains unclear. METHODS: Forty-one patients who underwent either transhiatal RS (n = 15) or laparoscopic surgery (LS) (n = 26) for Siewert type II/III AEG were enrolled in this study. The surgical outcomes of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: In the entire cohort, there were no significant intergroup differences in the operative time, blood loss volume, or number of retrieved lymph nodes. The length of the postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the RS group than in the LS group (14.20 ± 7.10 days vs. 18.73 ± 17.82 days, respectively; p = 0.0388). The morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2) was similar between the groups. In the Siewert II cohort, there were no significant intergroup differences in short-term outcomes. In the entire cohort, there was no significant difference between the RS and LS groups in the 3-year overall survival rate (91.67% vs. 91.48%, N.S.) or 3-year disease-free survival rate (91.67% vs. 91.78%, N.S.), respectively. Likewise, in the Siewert type II cohort, there was no significant difference between the RS and LS groups in the 3-year overall survival rate (80.00% vs. 93.33%, N.S.) or 3-year disease-free survival rate (80.00% vs. 94.12%, N.S.), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Transhiatal RS for Siewert II/III AEG was safe and contributed to similar short-term and long-term outcomes compared with LS.

Comparison of lymph node metastasis pattern from esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma versus very low thoracic esophageal squamous cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

Background: The anatomical locations of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (AEG) and very low thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are similar. This study aimed to evaluate the difference in lymph node metastasis (LNM) distribution between AEG and very low thoracic ESCC. Methods: Data from 156 Siewert I-II AEG patients and 120 ESCC patients with proximal edges located within 5 cm of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and underwent curative surgery from 2010 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM). Five or six baseline variables were included in PSM separately. All patients underwent curative transthoracic surgery and systematic lymphadenectomy. After PSM, LNM rates of major stations were compared using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Results: After PSM was performed with covariates (age, sex, T stage, grade, tumor length), 60 pairs of patients were included. The lower mediastinal and total thoracic LNM rates of ESCC were significantly higher than those of AEG (18.3% vs. 3.3%, P=0.019; 25% vs. 3.3%, P=0.002). After further addition of the N stage as a variant to the previous PSM model, we found that the paracardial LNM distribution was significantly different between ESCC and AEG patients (36.1% vs. 19.7%, P=0.043). Among all tumor characteristics, only the T stage was positively correlated with paracardial LNM in ESCC (P=0.010), but not in AEG. In AEG, the median survival was poor for patients with thoracic LNM. Conclusions: Patients with very low thoracic ESCC exhibit stronger metastatic ability in the lower mediastinal and paracardial nodes than Siewert I-II AEG. However, the pathological metastasis of AEG in thoracic nodes was associated with poor survival outcomes.

Is single tract jejunal interposition better than double tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy?

Double tract reconstruction (DTR) is the main digestive tract reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy (PG). Single tract jejunal interposition (STJI) derived from the double tract reconstruction is also increasingly used in clinical practice. However, there is still a great controversy as to which of the two reconstruction methods can achieve better results. In this study, we systematically reviewed studies on DTR and STJI after PG and performed a meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for clinical studies comparing DTR and STJI after PG to December 2021 without language restriction. Review Manager (version5.4) software was used to perform meta-analysis on operative outcomes, postoperative complications and nutritional outcomes. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022301455). Five randomized controlled trials involving 453 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between DTR and STJI in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of reflux esophagitis, anastomotic complications and total complications. The operation time of STJI group was longer than that of DTR group [WMD - 0.79; 95% CI (- 1.55, - 0.03)] [heterogeneity: χ2 = 4.94, df = 3 (P = 0.18); I2 = 39%, test for overall effect: Z = 2.04 (P = 0.04)]. The body weight of STJI group was significantly higher than that of DTR group at 6 months after surgery [WMD 3.90; 95% CI (0.56, 7.23)] [heterogeneity: τ2 = 7.67, χ2 = 19.76, df = 2 (P < 0.0001); I2 = 90%, test for overall effect: Z = 2.29 (P = 0.02)]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of DTR and STJI after PG. There were no significant differences in operative outcomes and postoperative complications between DTR and STJI after PG. Although STJI prolonged the operation time compared to DTR, postoperative nutritional outcomes of patients in the STJI group was significantly better than that in the DTR group. Therefore, compared to DTR, STJI may be more suitable for the vast majority of patients undergoing PG due to its better postoperative nutritional status.

Minimum number of necessary lymph nodes for the accurate staging of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the minimum number of lymph nodes (LNs) necessary for assessing the postoperative staging of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG). METHODS: We extracted the data of patients from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, who were pathologically diagnosed with AEG between 2000 and 2017. We explored the associations between the number of LNs and overall survival (OS) by univariate and multivariate analyses and determined the proper cutoff value of the number of LNs necessary for accurate postoperative staging. RESULTS: Of the patients with AEG in the SEER database, 2668 met our inclusion criteria. The total number of regional LNs dissected was found to be significantly associated with survival in analyses stratified by T stage. Univariate and multivariate regression showed that age, grade, positive LNs, number of LNs examined, and T stage were independently associated with OS. For patients with T1-2 tumors, the 5-year survival rate was 58.7%, and patients with more than 11 LNs examined obtained a greater survival benefit. Among patients with T3-4 tumors, the 5-year survival rates were 28.9% and 39.7% for those with 1-16 LNs examined and for those with more than 17 LNs examined, respectively. CONCLUSION: To accurately determine the pathological stage of patients with AEG, no less than 11 LNs must be resected for patients with stage T1-2 disease, and no less than 16 LNs must be resected for patients with stage T3-4 disease.

Safety and efficacy of preoperative indocyanine green fluorescence marking in laparoscopic gastrectomy for proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (ICG MAP study).

PURPOSE: The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) and proximal gastric cancer (PGC) is rising worldwide. Recently, the use of indocyanine green (ICG) tracer-guided surgery has been reported; however, its efficacy for total/proximal gastrectomy has not been clarified. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of ICG fluorescent marking for tumor localization in AEG/PGC treatment by laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: We enrolled patients with AEG/PGC from October 2016 to March 2019 from a prospectively registered database. On the day before surgery, ICG markings were made at four locations just at the edge of the tumor by gastrointestinal fiberscope examination. Surgery was performed while viewing the fluorescence image of ICG, and the proximal portions of the esophagus and the distal portion of the stomach were resected at the edge of the area where ICG had spread. RESULTS: We enrolled 130 patients with AEG/PGC. Overall, 107 patients were eventually included in the study: AEG n = 64 (60%) and PGC n = 43 (40%). ICG markings were detected intraoperatively in all cases, and cancer invasion into the resection lines of the esophagus and stomach, performed based on ICG fluorescence images, was negative in all cases. The median visible range of ICG fluorescence was 22.5 mm. ICG diffusion expanded 20 mm proximal for AEG. There were no adverse events associated with endoscopic ICG injection. CONCLUSION: ICG fluorescence imaging is feasible and safe and can potentially be used as a tumor-marking agent for determining the surgical resection line for total/proximal gastrectomy in AEG and PGC treatment.

Recent advances in multidisciplinary therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (EGJA) have long been associated with poor prognosis. With changes in the spectrum of the disease caused by economic development and demographic changes, the incidence of EAC and EGJA continues to increase, making them worthy of more attention from clinicians. For a long time, surgery has been the mainstay treatment for EAC and EGJA. With advanced techniques, endoscopic therapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and other treatment methods have been developed, providing additional treatment options for patients with EAC and EGJA. In recent decades, the emergence of multidisciplinary therapy (MDT) has enabled the comprehensive treatment of tumors and made the treatment more flexible and diversified, which is conducive to achieving standardized and individualized treatment of EAC and EGJA to obtain a better prognosis. This review discusses recent advances in EAC and EGJA treatment in the surgical-centered MDT mode in recent years.

Comparable long-term outcomes after endoscopic therapy and gastrectomy of early adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Current guidelines recommend consideration of endoscopic therapy (ET) when treating selected early gastric cancers. However, clinical decision-making on ET versus gastrectomy for early adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEGJ) remains challenging because of uncertain long-term outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2017 of early AEGJ patients underwent ET or gastrectomy. Multivariate models were used to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: Of 881 included early AEGJ patients, 227 (36.2%) patients underwent ET and 654 (63.8%) patients underwent gastrectomy. Early AEGJ patients who underwent ET experienced a similar hazard of cancer-specific death compared with those underwent gastrectomy in both multivariate Cox regression (HR [hazard ratio], 0.93; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.55-1.56; P = 0.78) and the multivariate competing risk model (subdistribution HR [SHR], 0.86; 95% CI 0.50-1.45; P = 0.56). Propensity score matching was used, 210 patients underwent ET were matched with 210 patients underwent gastrectomy. Patients underwent ET experienced a similar hazard of cancer-specific death compared with those underwent gastrectomy in both multivariate Cox regression (HR, 0.97; 95% CI 0.53-1.77; P = 0.92) and the multivariate competing risk model (SHR, 0.96; 95% CI 0.52-1.77; P = 0.89). CONCLUSION: Early AEGJ patients who received ET or gastrectomy had comparable long-term outcomes, which lend support to the role of ET in the treatment of these patients.

Clinical significance of lower perigastric lymph nodes dissection in Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a retrospective propensity score matched study.

PURPOSE: The optimal surgical procedure, whether total gastrectomy (TG) or proximal gastrectomy (PG), for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has not been standardised, primarily because the optimal extent of lymph node (LN) dissection for AEG based on the metastatic rate of perigastric LNs remains under debate. The aim of this study was to investigate the metastatic incidence and prognostic significance of lower perigastric lymph nodes (LPLN), including No.4d, 5, 6 and 12a LN stations, in Siewert type II/III AEG. METHODS: A total of 701 patients with Siewert type II/III AEG who received transabdominal open gastrectomy (425 patients with TG and 276 patients with PG) from 2010 to 2015 in West China Hospital were retrospectively included. Based on the clinicopathological information of TG patients, the risk factors of LPLN-positive patients were evaluated, and the metastatic incidence as well as the therapeutic value (TV) index of each LN station was assessed. Moreover, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates between LPLN-positive and LPLN-negative groups were compared in TG patients, and the postoperative survival difference between TG and PG patients was also compared, using propensity score matching (PSM) method. RESULTS: Tumour size (≥ 5 cm, OR = 1.481, p = 0.002) and pT stage (pT4, OR = 2.755, p = 0.024) were significant risk factors for patients with LPLN metastasis. For patients with tumour size more than 5 cm or pT4 stage, the metastatic rates of LPLN for Siewert type II, III and II/III AEG were 31.67%, 34.69% and 33.03%, whereas the TV indexes of LPLN for them were 5.76, 5.62 and 5.38, respectively. LPLN was a significant independent prognostic factor (HR = 1.422, p = 0.028), and positive LPLN was related to worse prognosis (p < 0.05). For patients with tumour size more than 5 cm or pT4 stage, TG patients were illustrated to have a better prognosis than PG patients, with 5-year OS rates of 58.9% vs 38.2% for Siewert type II AEG (χ2 = 4.159, p = 0.041), 68.9% vs 50.2% for Siewert type III AEG (χ2 = 5.630, p = 0.018) and 65.1% vs 40.3% for Siewert type II/III AEG (χ2 = 12.604, p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LPLN metastasis is a poor prognostic factor for patients with Siewert II/III AEG. LPLN dissection may improve the long-term survival of patients with tumour size more than 5 cm or pT4 stage, and TG might be more suitable for this kind of cancer.

Progress on integrated treatment of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#Surgery is an accepted standard in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG), but the efficacy of surgery alone for locally advanced AEG is limited. In-depth studies concerning combined therapy for AEG have been carried out worldwide, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), perioperative chemotherapy (pCT), postoperative chemoradiotherapy, etc. Significantly, the contribution of nCRT and pCT to improving the prognosis of locally advanced AEG patients has been shed light on. Compared with that, multimodality treatment for AEG patients is not well established in China. An attempt was thus made to take an overview of the evidence-based research advance regarding integrated therapy of AEG.

Application value of self-pulling and latter transection technique in double anti-reflux double-tract reconstruction of totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective:To investigate the application value of self-pulling and latter transection (SPLT) technique in double anti-reflux double-tract reconstruction of totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopatholo-gical data of 103 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction in clinical stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ who were admitted to Shanxi Cancer Hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were collected. There were 65 males and 38 females, aged from 45 to 79 years, with a median age of 59 years. Of 103 patients, 49 cases undergoing totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction of SPLT were assigned into the SPLT group, 54 cases undergoing totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with conventional double-tract reconstruction were assigned into the traditional group. Observation indicators: (1) intraoperative situations; (2) postoperative situations; (3) follow-up. Follow-up was conducted by outpatient examination and telephone inter-view to detect postoperative reflux esophagitis of patients up to December 2021. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and the t test was used for comparison between groups. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range) or M( Q1, Q3), and the Wilcoxon test was used for comparison between groups. Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was performed using the chi-square test. Comparison of ordinal data was analyzed using the non-parameter rank sum test. Results:(1) Intraoperative situations: the operation time, digestive tract reconstruction time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, the number of inferior mediastinal lymph nodes dissected, cases with auxiliary incisions for the SPLT group were (261±48)minutes, (26±4)minutes, (114±42)mL, 8.0(6.5,9.5), 1, respectively. The above indicators were (244±42)minutes, (30±6)minutes, (118±46)mL, 5.5(4.0,8.0), 9 for the traditional group, respectively. There were significant differences in the digestive tract reconstruction time, the number of inferior mediastinal lymph nodes dissected and cases with auxiliary incisions between the two groups ( t=-3.34, Z=-4.05, χ2=4.72, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the operation time or volume of intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( t=1.87, -0.47, P>0.05). (2) Postoperative situations: duration of postopera-tive hospital stay and cases with postoperative complications were (11.5±2.7)days and 4 for the SPLT group, versus (12.5±4.3)days and 9 for the traditional group, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( t=-1.47, χ2=1.68, P>0.05). There were 13 of 103 patients with postopera-tive complications, including 5 cases of left pleural effusion, 4 cases of anastomotic leakage, 2 cases of mild pneumonia, 1 case of incision infection, 1 case of chylous leakage. Four patients had anasto-motic leakage at the esophagojejunostomy, the abdominal esophagus of whom was invaded by more than 1 cm. During the operation, mediastinal drainage tubes were placed through the abdominal wall. The 4 patients were cured after enteral and parenteral nutrition support and adequate drainage, and the remaining patients with complications were cured after symptomatic treatment. (3) Follow-up: of 49 patients in the SPLT group, 43 cases were followed up for (18±4)months. During the follow-up, 1 case showed reflux esophagitis by gastroscopy, with the incidence of 2.33%(1/43). Of 54 patients in the traditional group, 53 cases were followed up for (17±4)months. During the follow-up, 4 cases showed reflux esophagitis by gastroscopy, with the incidence of 7.55%(4/53). There was no significant difference in the incidence of reflux esophagitis between the two groups ( χ2=0.47, P>0.05). Conclusions:SPLT technology is feasible for double anti-reflux double-tract reconstruction of proximal gastrectomy. Compared with traditional double-tract reconstruction of totally laparos-copic proximal gastrectomy, SPLT technology can reduce the auxiliary incisions, increase the number of lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissected, and shorten the digestive tract reconstruction time.

Progress on surgical treatment in gastric cancer / 国际外科学杂志

There are high burden of disease including a high incidence, relatively high proportion of late stage when diagnosed and poor overall prognosis in China regarding to the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. Surgery remains as the major treatment for gastric cancer. Based on the latest guidelines, endoscopic surgery or gastrectomy is performed for early gastric cancer, and the standard surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer is D2 lymphadenectomy. Besides, this article will discuss about other research hotspots, such as expansion of lymph node dissection in selected patients, construction methods of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction, especially Siewert type Ⅱ, minimally invasive techniques (laparoscopic gastrectomy and robotic gastrectomy), the surgical treatment for elderly patients with gastric cancer will be discussed also.

Treatment Options for T1 Stage Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients diagnosed with T1 stage adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEGJ) has been increasing. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of different treatment options (surgery, chemoradiation, and surgery+chemoradiation) on long-term survival in patients with T1-stage AEGJ. METHODS: We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify the records of patients with T1-stage AEGJ between 2010 and 2018. Patient demographics and cancer parameters were compared among the three groups. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to compare long-term survival. RESULTS: Data from 925 T1 stage AEGJ patients (surgery: n=516, surgery+chemoradiation: n=206, chemoradiation: n=203) were collected. We found that the OS and CSS rates of three treatment options had significant difference. Besides, positive nodal status also showed lower OS and CSS rat. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that surgery group has much lower risk of death compared with chemoradiation group and similar risk of death compared with surgery+chemoradiation group. Subgroup analysis suggested that in patients with N1-N3 status had higher OS and CSS rates in surgery+chemoradiation group. CONCLUSION: Using SEER data, we identified a significant survival advantage with the use of surgery compared to chemoradiation in patients with T1-stage AEGJ while the long-term survival of patients after surgery+chemoradiation group was not significantly different and low risk of death in positive nodal status.

Long-Term Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Potentially Resectable Advanced Siewert Type II and III Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction.

BACKGROUND: Reports have shown that neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) increases the R0 resection rate for patients with Siewert type II or III adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AEG). However, the long-term efficacy of nCRT for AEG patients remains unclear. In this multicenter study, we investigated the long-term results of AEG patients treated with nCRT. METHODS: A total of 149 patients with potentially resectable advanced AEG (T3/4, Nany, M0) were randomly divided into two groups: the nCRT-treated group (treated group) (n = 76) and the surgery group (control group) (n = 73). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary outcome indexes included the R0 resection rate, HER-2 expression, tumor regression grade (TRG), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. RESULTS: In the treated group, the overall therapeutic efficacy rate was 40.8%, and the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 16.9%. The rates of patients who underwent R0 resection in the treated and control groups were 97.0% and 87.7%, respectively (p < 0.05). The toxic effects were mainly graded 1-2 in the treated group. The median DFS times in the treated and control groups were 33 and 27 months, respectively (p = 0.08), whereas the median OS times were 39 and 30 months, respectively (p = 0.01). The median DFS times of patients with positive and negative HER-2 expression in the treated group were 13 and 43 months, respectively (p = 0.01), and the median OS times were 27 and 41 months, respectively (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Surgery after nCRT improved the efficacy of treatment for AEG patients and thus provided a better prognosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01962246).

The probability of Lymph node metastasis with a tumor size larger than and smaller than 4 cm is different in stages T1-T3 of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: A Population-Based Study.

Background: In adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG), the relationship between tumor size (TS) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) is unclear. This study aimed to explore the relationship between TS and LNM, and to construct a prediction model for LNM. Materials and Methods: Data from 4649 Siewert type II AEG patients were retrospectively acquired from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database. TS data was analyzed as a continuous variable, but also divided into 1-cm-interval categorical groups for further analysis. The logistic regression model and restricted cubic spline (RCS) model was used to explore the relationship between TS and LNM, after adjusting for covariates. Internal validations as well as external validation (Single-Center data) were used to check our LNM prediction model. Results: TS and LNM showed a significant relationship in the logistic regression analysis, regardless of the TS data being entered as a continuous or a categorical variable, after adjusting for covariates. The logistic regression model and RCS consistently showed that larger TS resulted in larger Odds Ratio (OR) values. When tumors were larger than 4 cm, the OR value remained relatively constant. The receiver operator characteristic curve evaluated the nomogram by the area under the curve (AUC) (AUC=0.737, in internal validation; AUC=0.626, in external validation), and the calibration curve of the nomogram showed an improved prediction system. Conclusions: In Siewert type II T1-T3 stage AEG patients, we reported that LNM increased with TS up to 4-cm, and our nomogram provided a simple tool to predict LNM.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus apatinib for patients with locally advanced, HER2-negative, Siewert's type II-III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial.

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plus apatinib in treating locally advanced, HER2-negative, Siewert's type II-III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) patients. Thirty eligible patients were analyzed in this single-arm, open-label, phase II trial. Patients received neoadjuvant regimen as follows: two cycles of apatinib (orally, 250 mg/day on day 1-28), two cycles of capecitabine (orally, 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on day 1-14), oxaliplatin (intravenously, 130 mg/m2 on day 1), and concurrent radiotherapy (a total dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions) started on day 1 of chemotherapy. Then, surgery was performed within 8-12 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant therapy. This trial was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov website (access number: NCT03349866). After neoadjuvant CRT plus apatinib treatment, 18 (60.0%) patients achieved objective response, 29 (96.7%) patients achieved disease control, and 20 (66.7%) patients achieved down-staging. Encouragingly, tumor regression grade (TRG) 0, TRG 1, TRG 2 and TRG 3 were observed in 33.3%, 20.0%, 30.0% and 10.0% patients, respectively; the pathological complete response rate was 33.3%, and the R0 resection rate was 93.3%. Regarding survivals, the 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 96.7% and 88.1%, respectively. Meanwhile, the 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 100.0% and 96.6%, respectively. As to safety, the majority of the adverse events were of mild grade, and the post-operative complications were manageable. In conclusion, neoadjuvant CRT plus apatinib exhibits high efficacy and acceptable tolerance in patients with locally advanced, HER2-negative, Siewert's type II-III AEG.