Predictive factors for adnexal involvement in endometrial cancer FIGO stage IIIA.

OBJECTIVE: Understanding ovarian involvement incidence and risk factors in women with endometrial cancer may inform the decision of ovary preservation. METHODS: Our retrospective study included all consecutive fully surgically staged patients with endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery between January 2005 and November 2021, assessing the incidence of ovarian metastasis, its role as a prognostic factor for recurrence and death, and evaluated predictors of adnexal involvement. RESULTS: Women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 IIIA endometrial cancer comprised 2.3% of the population (36 of 1535 included patients), 23 (63.9%) with endometrioid histology, and a median age of 57.0 years (range 47.7-66.7). A higher body mass index, post-menopausal status, endometrioid histotype, and ß-catenin expression were associated with a lower risk of adnexal involvement. Conversely, dMMR phenotype, p53 expression, myometrial infiltration >50%, lymphovascular space invasion, and cervical stromal invasion were independent predictors of an increased risk of adnexal involvement. A total of 145 (9.5%) patients had adnexal involvement, with an incidence rate of 0.27/100 person-days. Overall survival for FIGO (2009) stage IIIA was 88.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that ovarian preservation may be considered for younger patients with low-risk endometrial cancer (G1 and G2 tumors, absence of lymphovascular space invasion, no cervical involvement, and myometrial invasion <50%), adding a favorable predictive role to higher body mass index and high ß-catenin expression.

Molecular changes driving low-grade serous ovarian cancer and implications for treatment.

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer was previously thought to be a subtype of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, but it is now recognized as a distinct disease with unique clinical and molecular behaviors. The disease may arise de novo or develop from a serous borderline ovarian tumor. Although it is more indolent than high-grade serous ovarian cancer, most patients have advanced metastatic disease at diagnosis and recurrence is common. Recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer is often resistant to standard platinum-taxane chemotherapy, making it difficult to treat with the options currently available. New targeted therapies are needed, but their development is contingent on a deeper understanding of the specific biology of the disease. The known molecular drivers of low-grade tumors are strong hormone receptor expression, mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway (KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS), and in genes related to the MAPK pathway (NF1/2, EIF1AX, and ERBB2). However, MAPK inhibitors have shown only modest clinical responses. Based on the discovery of CDKN2A mutations in low-grade serous ovarian cancer, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are now being tested in clinical trials in combination with hormone therapy. Additional mutations seen in a smaller population of low-grade tumors include USP9X, ARID1A, and PIK3CA, but no specific therapies targeting them have been tested clinically. This review summarizes the clinical, pathologic, and molecular features of low-grade serous ovarian cancer as they are now understood and introduces potential therapeutic targets and new avenues for research.

Role of fertility-sparing surgery and further prognostic factors in borderline tumors of the ovary.

OBJECTIVE: Borderline tumors of the ovary are a rare group of ovarian neoplasms with distinctive histological features. Considering their favorable prognosis and occurrence at a younger age, fertility-sparing surgery may be considered. Several risk factors have been identified as contributing to a higher recurrence rate, while the impact of pathohistological features varies in the literature. This study aimed to analyze risk factors for recurrence in patients with borderline tumors of the ovary. METHODS: Analysis included patients treated with first diagnosis of a borderline tumor at our center between January 1997 and December 2022 to analyze disease-free survival and to identify the role of fertility-sparing surgery, defined as preservation of at least one ovary, pathohistological features, and other prognostic factors for relapse. All stages classified according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) were included. RESULTS: Among 507 patients, 26 patients (5.2%) had a recurrence, with 21 (4.1%) showing borderline histology and 5 (1%) with invasive relapses. Recurrence rate was higher following fertility-sparing surgery (p<0.0001). Median follow-up period was 49.2 (range 42.0-57.6) months. Among 153 patients (30.2%) who had fertility-sparing surgery, 21 (13.7%) experienced a recurrence (including one invasive relapse). Fertility-sparing surgery (HR 20; 95% CI 6.9 to 60; p<0.001), FIGO stage I with bilateral presence of tumor (HR 6.4; 95% CI 1.3 to 31; p=0.020), FIGO stage II (HR 15; 95% CI 3.4 to 68; p<0.001), FIGO stages III-IV (HR 38; 95% CI 10 to 140; p<0.001) in comparison with FIGO stage I with unilateral tumor, microinvasion (HR 8.6; 95% CI 2.7 to 28; p<0.001), and micropapillary growth patterns (HR 4.4; 95% CI 1.8 to 10; p=0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for recurrence in multivariate analysis. None of these factors were associated with an increased risk of disease-related death. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that although a fertility-preserving approach is associated with increased recurrence rates of a borderline tumor, it does not affect overall survival and can therefore be regarded as oncologically safe for patients desiring to preserve fertility. Additionally, presence of micropapillary patterns and microinvasion were identified as prognostic risk factors.

Evaluation of the incorporation of an IOTA-ADNEX model in the discrimination of adnexal masses in our third-level hospital centre, taking into account the menopausal status of patients. Five years of experience / Evaluación de la incorporación del IOTA-ADNEX model en la discriminación de las masas anexiales en nuestro centro hospitalario de tercer nivel teniendo en cuenta el estado menopáusico en la predicción de malignidad. Cinco años de experiencia

Objective: The objectives were to estimate the performance of the IOTA-ADNEX model test after its incorporation into the ultrasound tests of our third-grade hospital gynecology service, as well as to assess whether its capacity of accuracy is modified when taking into account the patient's menopausal status. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to clinically evaluate the diagnostic performance of the IOTA-ADNEX model test, which was performed between January 2016 and December 2021. The study included 573 women with an adnexal injury who underwent surgical excision within 180 days after ultrasound diagnosis and histological confirmation (gold standard). After the ultrasound exam, the injuries were classified using the ADNEX model. The study estimated the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of the ADNEX model for classifying between benign and malignant adnexal masses and compared the performance by menopausal state. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for different cut-off points. Results: Out of the 573 women, 183 (31.9%) had a malignant tumor. The AUC of the ADNEX model for differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal masses at the time of ultrasound examination was 0.92 and the best malignancy threshold, detected by Youden index, was 22.5%. At this cut-off, the sensitivity of the ADNEX model was 91.8% and the specificity was 76.4%. However, it varies according to menopausal status: in the group of pre-menopausal patient, sensitivity was 86.1% (95% CI, 85.4%–86.8%) and specificity was 81.3% (95% CI, 85.4%–86.8%). In the postmenopausal group, sensitivity was 96.1% (95% CI, 95.6%–96.7%) and specificity was 68.5% (95% CI, 68.1%–68.8%)...(AU)

Objetivo: Los objetivos eran estimar el rendimiento del test IOTA ADNEX model después de su incorporación en el estudio ecográfico en nuestro servicio de ginecología, en un hospital de tercer nivel, así como evaluar si su capacidad de precisión se modifica al tener en cuenta el estado menopáusico de la paciente. Método: Se llevó a cabo un estudio transversal para evaluar clínicamente el rendimiento diagnóstico del test IOTA ADNEX model, el cual se realizó entre enero de 2016 y diciembre de 2021. El estudio incluyó a 573 mujeres con una lesión anexial que se sometieron a tratamiento quirúrgico en un plazo de 180 días después del diagnóstico por ecografía y confirmación histológica (gold standard). Después de realizar la ecografía, las lesiones fueron clasificadas utilizando el modelo ADNEX. El estudio estimó el área bajo la curva (AUC) del modelo ADNEX para diferenciar entre masas anexiales benignas y malignas, y se comparó el rendimiento según el estado menopáusico. Se determinó la sensibilidad y la especificidad para diferentes puntos de corte. Resultados: De las 573 mujeres, 183 (31,9%) tenían un tumor maligno. El AUC del modelo ADNEX para diferenciar entre masas anexiales benignas y malignas en el momento del examen ecográfico fue de 0,92 y el umbral de malignidad óptimo, detectado por el índice de Youden, fue del 22,5%. Con este punto de corte, la sensibilidad (SE) del modelo ADNEX fue del 91,8% y la especificidad (SP) fue del 76,4%. Sin embargo, esto varía según el estado menopáusico: en el grupo de pacientes premenopáusicas, la sensibilidad fue del 86,1% (IC del 95%: 85,4-86,8%) y la especificidad fue del 813% (IC del 95%: 85,4-86,8%). En el grupo de pacientes posmenopáusicas, la sensibilidad fue del 96,1% (IC del 95%: 95,6-96,7%) y la especificidad fue del 68,5% (IC del 95%: 68,1-68,8%)...(AU)

Uterine transposition for fertility and ovarian function preservation after radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of uterine transposition as a method of preserving fertility and ovarian function after pelvic radiation. METHODS: This prospective multicenter observational study included patients with non-gynecologic pelvic cancers who underwent pelvic radiation as part of their cancer treatment between June 2017 and June 2019. For inclusion in the study, patients were required to have normal menstrual cycles and hormone levels (follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and estrogen) before treatment. Uterine transposition to the upper abdomen was performed prior to irradiation. Clinical examinations and Doppler ultrasonography were used to evaluate the gonadal vasculature post-surgery. The uterus was repositioned into the pelvis 2-4 weeks after radiation therapy or at the time of rectosigmoid resection in patients with rectal cancer who had undergone neoadjuvant treatment. Cancer treatment and follow-up were performed according to standard guidelines. RESULTS: Eight patients (seven with rectal cancer and one with pelvic liposarcoma) underwent uterine transposition at a median age of 30.5 years (range 19-37). The uterus was successfully preserved in six patients, accompanied by normal menses, hormonal levels, and vaginal intercourse after treatment. One patient with rectal cancer died of carcinomatosis 4 months after uterine transposition. One patient presented with uterine necrosis 4 days after uterine transposition, and the uterus was removed; however, one ovary was preserved. Cervical ischemia was the most common post-surgical complication in three (37.5%) patients. Three patients attempted to conceive, and two (66%) were spontaneously successful and delivered healthy babies at 36 and 38 weeks by cesarean section without complications. CONCLUSIONS: Uterine transposition is a feasible procedure for preserving gonadal and uterine function in patients requiring pelvic radiotherapy for non-gynecological cancer, with the potential for achieving spontaneous pregnancy and successful delivery.

The burden of paraovarian cysts - a case series and review of the literature.

Introduction: A paraovarian cyst (POC) is a cyst in the broad ligament or mesosalpinx. Paraovarian cysts have an estimated prevalence of 5-20% amongst the adnexal masses. Despite the high prevalence and availability of advanced imaging modalities, an accurate pre-operative diagnosis of POC is still made in less than 50% of patients. Case reports: Two females with suspected ovarian torsion underwent laparotomy and had POCs. A 42-year-old hysterectomized female underwent surgery for a suspected POC which turned out to be a mesenteric cyst. Two females underwent laparotomy for suspected mesenteric cysts which turned out to be POCs. A nulliparous female with infertility conceived spontaneously after cystectomy of POC. Results: Optimal management of an adnexal mass depends on the knowledge of the origin and the exact nature of the mass. No clear-cut guidelines exist for the management of POCs despite their high prevalence. There is a need for further research on this topic to formulate clear-cut guidelines for their management. Conclusions: Radiologists and gynaecologists need to keep them in mind as differentials for patients with adnexal masses to ensure a correct pre-operative diagnosis in order to achieve an optimal outcome for these females. Gynaecologists need to be aware of the cases which can be managed conservatively and those that need surgery, along with the extent of the surgery required, taking care to protect the ovary at all costs, particularly in benign cases.

A Rare Case of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence in Ovarian Site after 12 Years Mimicking a Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma: Case Report.

Hepatoid carcinoma of the ovary (HCO) is a tumor that resembles, both histologically and cytologically, hepatocarcinoma (HCC) in a patient with a non-cirrhotic liver not involved by the disease. Hepatoid carcinoma is an extremely rare histologic subtype of ovarian cancer and should be distinguished from metastatic HCC. Here, we report the rare case of a 67-year-old woman with ovarian recurrence of HCC 12 years after first diagnosis. The patient was being followed by oncologists because she had been diagnosed with HCV-related HCC (Edmonson and Stainer grade 2, pT2 N0 M0, G2, V1) in 2009. She had undergone surgery for enlarged left hepatectomy to the 4th hepatic segment with cholecystectomy and subsequent placement of a Kehr drain. The preoperative alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level was 8600 ng/mL, while the postoperative value was only 2.7 ng/mL. At the first diagnosis, no other localizations of the disease, including the genital tract, were found. At the time of recurrence, however, the patient was completely asymptomatic: her liver function was within normal limits with negative blood indices, except for an increased blood dosage of AFP (467 ng/mL), and CA125, which became borderline (37.4 IU/mL). The oncologist placed an indication for a thoracic abdominal CT scan, which showed that the residual liver was free of disease, and the presence of a formation with a solid-cystic appearance and some calcifications at the left adnexal site. The radiological findings were confirmed on level II gynecological ultrasound. The patient then underwent a radical surgery of hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, pelvic peritonectomy, and omentectomy by a laparotomic approach, with the sending of intraoperative extemporaneous histological examination on the annexus site of the tumor mass, obtaining RT = 0. Currently, the patient continues her gyneco-oncology follow-up simultaneously clinically, in laboratory, and instrumentally every 4 months. Our study currently represents the longest elapsed time interval between first diagnosis and disease recurrence, as evidenced by current data in the literature. This was a rather unique and difficult clinical case because of the rarity of the disease, the lack of scientific evidence, and the difficulty in differentiating the primary hepatoid phenotype of the ovary from an ovarian metastasis of HCC. Several multidisciplinary meetings for proper interpretation of clinical and anamnestic data, with the aid of immunohistochemistry (IHC) on histological slides were essential for case management.

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in the Evaluation of Adnexal Masses with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether incorporating qualitative parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can increase the accuracy of adnexal lesion assessments with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound category 4 or 5. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with adnexal masses who underwent conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations between January and August of 2020. The study investigators reviewed and analyzed the morphological features of each mass before categorizing the US images independently according to the O-RADS system published by the American College of Radiology. In the CEUS analysis, the initial time and intensity of enhancement involving the wall and/or septation of the mass were compared with the uterine myometrium. Internal components of each mass were observed for signs of enhancement. The sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index were calculated as the contrast variables and O-RADS. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the best cutoff value was higher than O-RADS 4. When information on the extent of enhancement was applied to selectively upgrade O-RADS category 4 and selectively downgrade O-RADS category 5, the overall sensitivity increased to 90.2%, while the level of specificity (91.3%) remained the same. CONCLUSION: Incorporating additional information from CEUS with respect to the extent of enhancement helped to improve the sensitivity of O-RADS category 4 and 5 masses without loss of specificity.

Ovarian Masses: The Value of Acoustic Shadowing on Ultrasound Examination.

Adnexal lesions are a common finding in women and pose a clinical challenge since ovarian cancer is a highly lethal disease. However, most adnexal masses are benign, benefiting from a more conservative approach. In preoperative assessment, transvaginal ultrasound plays a key role in evaluating morphologic features that correlate with the risk of malignancy. The acoustic shadow is the loss of echo behind sound-absorbing components, such as calcifications or fibrous tissues, which are predominantly found in benign lesions. However, recognizing the acoustic shadow is a difficult skill to master, and its usefulness may be underappreciated.

Ovarian cancer during pregnancy.

Adnexal masses during pregnancy are a relatively uncommon entity. Their clinical management is challenging given the overlapping features of certain entities on imaging and histopathology, which can mimic malignancy, and the potential side effects to the mother and fetus, whether expectant management versus surgery is pursued. Ultrasonography with Doppler evaluation is the modality of choice for evaluating adnexal masses during pregnancy. Magnetic resonance imaging is the second-line modality useful when US findings are inconclusive/indeterminate. Most adnexal masses in pregnant patients are benign in origin (e.g., functional cysts, mature cystic teratoma, decidualization of endometrioma), but a few are malignant in origin (e.g., dysgerminoma, granulosa cell tumor). Most cases of adnexal masses are asymptomatic, but complications such as ovarian torsion can occur. This review aims to familiarize the radiologist with the imaging of adnexal lesions during pregnancy so that the radiologist can identify ovarian cancer. Specifically, the review will detail the most common benign and malignant adnexal masses in pregnancy, mimickers, and their corresponding imaging findings on US and MRI.

Adnexal torsion in pregnancy: A systematic review of case reports and case series.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate clinical presentations, surgical procedures and findings, complications, and predisposing factors of adnexal torsion in pregnant women. METHODS: We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science from January 2000 to March 2022. All case reports and case series with full-text English language reporting adnexal torsion in pregnant women were included. Medical history, clinical presentations, surgical procedures and findings, complications related to adnexal torsion, and predisposing factors were independently extracted by two investigators. RESULTS: A total of 182 articles reporting 662 pregnant women with adnexal torsion were included. Most of the adnexal torsions occurred during the first trimester (54.63%), while others occurred during the second (26.36%) and third (19.00%) trimesters. The most common symptom of adnexal torsion was sudden-onset pain (80.60%). Enlargement of the adnexa was the most prevalent ultrasound finding in a twisted adnexa (95.20%). Additionally, about half of the patients had decreased blood flow in Doppler ultrasound (53.80%). Laparoscopic surgery was the favorite option (56.88%), while cystectomy and detorsion were the most commonly performed procedure (29.06%). Expectant management was reported in only 2.99% of the patients. In addition, the most common complications were preterm labor (27.58%) and emergent cesarean sections (25.28%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should think of adnexal torsion when pregnant women complain of sudden-onset pain. Then, using ultrasound, adnexal enlargement or masses should be explored seriously. They should take invasive and urgent therapy to preserve ovaries and prevent complications.

Assessment of the performance of the O-RADS MRI score for the evaluation of adnexal masses, with technical notes.

Objective: To assess the performance of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) score in the evaluation of adnexal masses and to provide technical notes about its current MRI parameters and concepts. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study of 226 patients with 287 adnexal masses (190 submitted to surgery or biopsy and 97 followed for at least one year). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the O-RADS MRI score, using ≥ 4 as the cutoff for malignancy. We performed a technical analysis of the main updates to the score, announced in September 2020 by the American College of Radiology, in comparison with the original (2013) version. Results: We found that an O-RADS MRI score of 4 or 5 was associated with malignancy of an adnexal mass, with a sensitivity of 91.11% (95% CI: 83.23-96.08), specificity of 94.92% (95% CI: 90.86-97.54), positive predictive value of 89.13% (95% CI: 81.71-93.77), negative predictive value of 95.90% (95% CI: 92.34-97.84), and overall accuracy of 93.73% (95% CI: 90.27-96.24). Conclusion: Our findings support the use of the O-RADS MRI score for evaluating adnexal masses, especially those considered indeterminate on ultrasound. The updates made recently to the O-RADS MRI score facilitate its interpretation and will allow its more widespread use, with no loss of diagnostic accuracy.

Objetivo: Determinar o desempenho do escore de ressonância magnética para lesões anexiais ovarianas (escore O-RADS RM), com notas técnicas sobre seus atuais parâmetros e conceitos de RM utilizados. Materiais e Métodos: Este estudo incluiu 226 pacientes com 287 massas anexiais (190 pacientes submetidas a cirurgia/biópsia e 97 pacientes com pelo menos um ano de seguimento). Calculamos sensibilidade, especificidade, valores preditivos positivos e negativos para as categorias do escore O-RADS RM, usando ≥ 4 como ponto de corte para malignidade. Realizamos análise técnica das principais atualizações do escore, anunciadas em setembro de 2020 pelo American College of Radiology, em comparação com a versão original de 2013. Resultados: Escores O-RADS RM categorias 4 ou 5 foram associados com malignidade da massa anexial, com sensibilidade de 91,11% (IC 95%: 83,23-96,08), especificidade de 94,92% (IC 95%: 90,86-97,54), valor preditivo positivo de 89,13% (IC 95%: 81,71-93,77), valor preditivo negativo de 95,90% (IC 95%: 92,34-97,84) e acurácia de 93,73% (IC 95%: 90,27-96,24). Conclusão: Este estudo reforçou o uso do escore O-RADS RM para avaliar massas anexiais, principalmente as indeterminadas por ultrassom. As atualizações feitas recentemente no escore O-RADS RM facilitam sua interpretação e permitirão seu uso mais difundido, sem perder a precisão diagnóstica.

Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the ability of the O-RADS and ADNEX models to classify benign or malignant adnexal lesions. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included women who underwent surgery for adnexal lesions. Two gynecologists independently categorized the adnexal lesions according to the O-RADS and ADNEX models. Four additional readers were included to validate the new quick-access O-RADS flowchart. RESULTS: Among the 322 patients included in this study, 264 (82.0%) had a benign diagnosis, and 58 (18.0%) had a malignant diagnosis. The malignant rates of O-RADS 2, O-RADS 3, O-RADS 4, and O-RADS 5 were 0%, 3.0%, 37.7%, and 78.9%, respectively. The AUC of the O-RADS in the 322 patients was 0.93. On comparing the O-RADS and ADNEX models in the remaining 281 patients, the AUCs of the O-RADS, ADNEX model with CA125, and ADNEX model without CA125 were 0.92, 0.95, and 0.94, respectively. When setting a uniform cutoff of ≥ 10% (≥ O-RADS 4) to predict malignancy, the O-RADS had higher sensitivity than the ADNEX model (96.6% vs. 91.4%), and relatively similar specificity. In addition, the readers with the quick-access flowchart spent less time categorizing O-RADS than the readers with only the original O-RADS table (mean analysis time: 99 min 15 s vs. 111 min 55 s). CONCLUSIONS: The O-RADS classification of the adnexal lesions as benign or malignant was comparable to that of the ADNEX model and had higher sensitivity at the 10% cutoff value. A quick-access O-RADS flowchart was helpful in O-RADS categorization and might shorten the analysis time. KEY POINTS: • Both O-RADS and ADNEX models had good diagnostic performance in distinguishing adnexal malignancy, and O-RADS had higher sensitivity than ADNEX model in uniform 10% cutoff to predict malignancy. • Quick-access O-RADS flowchart was developed to help review O-RADS classification and might help reduce the analysis time.

Assessment of the performance of the O-RADS MRI score for the evaluation of adnexal masses, with technical notes / Desempenho do escore O-RADS RM para avaliação de massas anexiais, com notas técnicas

Abstract Objective: To assess the performance of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) score in the evaluation of adnexal masses and to provide technical notes about its current MRI parameters and concepts. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study of 226 patients with 287 adnexal masses (190 submitted to surgery or biopsy and 97 followed for at least one year). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the O-RADS MRI score, using ≥ 4 as the cutoff for malignancy. We performed a technical analysis of the main updates to the score, announced in September 2020 by the American College of Radiology, in comparison with the original (2013) version. Results: We found that an O-RADS MRI score of 4 or 5 was associated with malignancy of an adnexal mass, with a sensitivity of 91.11% (95% CI: 83.23-96.08), specificity of 94.92% (95% CI: 90.86-97.54), positive predictive value of 89.13% (95% CI: 81.71-93.77), negative predictive value of 95.90% (95% CI: 92.34-97.84), and overall accuracy of 93.73% (95% CI: 90.27-96.24). Conclusion: Our findings support the use of the O-RADS MRI score for evaluating adnexal masses, especially those considered indeterminate on ultrasound. The updates made recently to the O-RADS MRI score facilitate its interpretation and will allow its more widespread use, with no loss of diagnostic accuracy.

Resumo Objetivo: Determinar o desempenho do escore de ressonância magnética para lesões anexiais ovarianas (escore O-RADS RM), com notas técnicas sobre seus atuais parâmetros e conceitos de RM utilizados. Materiais e Métodos: Este estudo incluiu 226 pacientes com 287 massas anexiais (190 pacientes submetidas a cirurgia/biópsia e 97 pacientes com pelo menos um ano de seguimento). Calculamos sensibilidade, especificidade, valores preditivos positivos e negativos para as categorias do escore O-RADS RM, usando ≥ 4 como ponto de corte para malignidade. Realizamos análise técnica das principais atualizações do escore, anunciadas em setembro de 2020 pelo American College of Radiology, em comparação com a versão original de 2013. Resultados: Escores O-RADS RM categorias 4 ou 5 foram associados com malignidade da massa anexial, com sensibilidade de 91,11% (IC 95%: 83,23-96,08), especificidade de 94,92% (IC 95%: 90,86-97,54), valor preditivo positivo de 89,13% (IC 95%: 81,71-93,77), valor preditivo negativo de 95,90% (IC 95%: 92,34-97,84) e acurácia de 93,73% (IC 95%: 90,27-96,24). Conclusão: Este estudo reforçou o uso do escore O-RADS RM para avaliar massas anexiais, principalmente as indeterminadas por ultrassom. As atualizações feitas recentemente no escore O-RADS RM facilitam sua interpretação e permitirão seu uso mais difundido, sem perder a precisão diagnóstica.

Ultrasound differentiation between benign versus malignant adnexal masses in pregnant patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group ultrasound Simple Rules method in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors in pregnant patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study that involved pregnant patients referred to our center due to suspicions of ovarian masses between January 2015 and December 2017 was performed. The Simple Rules performance was evaluated against the histopathological results. Each of the 10 sonographic Simple Rules were computed by logistic regression to demonstrate their odds ratios in predicting malignancy. RESULTS: Ultrasound were conducted in 153 subjects, and 61 of those patients underwent surgery. By assigning masses presenting inconclusive picture as probably malignant, the Simple Rules method showed sensitivity of 91.67% and specificity of 69.39%. After exclusion of masses with inconclusive findings, the method showed sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 94.44%. The Simple Rules risk estimation method for the 1% risk cutoff showed sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 51.02%. For the 3% cutoff, sensitivity was 91.67% and specificity was 53.06%. And for 30 % cutoff, sensitivity was 91.67% and specificity 73.47 %. The logistic regression model showed that the M-rules increased the risk of malignancy while the B-rules decreased the risk. CONCLUSIONS: Most ovarian masses in pregnant patients may be correctly categorized as benign or malignant using Simple Rules. This protocol may facilitate the management of pregnant patients presenting with adnexal masses.