The impact of different modalities of chemoradiation therapy and chemotherapy regimens on lymphopenia in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) would induce lymphopenia, leading to a poor prognosis. This study investigated whether chemotherapy increased lymphopenia during RT and explored the impacts of different chemotherapy regimens on the lymphocyte counts of patients receiving RT. Methods: Clinical parameters and lymphocyte data were collected from 215 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Severe lymphopenia (SRL) was defined as an absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) of ≤0.2×103 cells/µL. Patient overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The predictors of SRL were extracted using univariate and multivariate regression analyses with backward likelihood ratio elimination. Results: Compared with patients without SRL, patients with SRL with LA-NSCLC showed a poorer prognosis in terms of OS (P=0.003). Of the 215 patients, 130 underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and 85 underwent sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT). The OS was better in patients without SRL (in the CCRT group, P=0.01 and in the SCRT group, P=0.08). The mean ALCs for CCRT and SCRT did not differ significantly (P=0.27). The minimum ALC of CCRT was significantly lower than that of SCRT (P<0.0001). CCRT was a predictor of SRL (P=0.008). However, multivariate analysis showed that the different chemotherapy regimens were not predictors of SRL (all P>0.1). Conclusions: In LA-NSCLC, the outcomes of patients with SRL were poorer than those without SRL. RT and chemotherapy were the main factors affecting SRL development, while different chemotherapy regimens were not significantly associated with lymphocyte counts in LA-NSCLC.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Costs among Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy or Immunotherapy in Spain: A Single-Center, Real-World, Exploratory Study.

The objective of this observational, single-center, retrospective study conducted in a Spanish tertiary hospital was to describe the real-world (RW) healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) who received chemotherapy (CT) or immunotherapy (IT) as first and second lines of treatment. A total of 173 patients diagnosed with aNSCLC and treated between January 2016 and August 2020 were included. The standardized average costs per patient/year were EUR 40,973.2 and EUR 22,502.4 for first-line CT and IT and EUR 140,601.3 and EUR 20,175.9 for second-line CT and IT, respectively. The average annual costs per patient associated with adverse-event (AE) onset were EUR 29,939.7 and EUR 460.7 for first-line CT and IT and EUR 35,906.4 and EUR 3206.1 for second-line CT and IT, respectively. The costs associated with disease management were EUR 33,178.0 and EUR 22,448.4 for first-line CT and IT and EUR 127,134.2 and EUR 19,663.9 for second-line CT and IT, respectively. In conclusion, IT use showed a lower average annual cost per patient, which was associated with lower HCRU for both disease and AE management, compared to the use of CT. However, these results should be further confirmed in the context of the currently implemented treatment schemes, including the combination of CT with single or dual IT.

The combination of tumor mutational burden and T-cell receptor repertoire predicts the response to immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) and T-cell receptor (TCR) might predict the response to immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the predictive value of the combination of TMB and TCR was not clear. Targeted DNA and TCR sequencing were performed on tumor biopsy specimens. We combined TMB and TCR diversity into a TMB-and-TCR (TMR) score using logistic regression. In total, 38 patients with advanced NSCLC were divided into a discovery set (n = 17) and validation set (n = 21). A higher TMR score was associated with better response and longer progression-free survival to immunotherapy in both the discovery set and validation set. The performance of TMR score was confirmed in the two external validation cohorts of 225 NSCLC patients and 306 NSCLC patients. Tumors with higher TMR scores were more likely to combine with LRP1B gene mutation (p = 0.027) and top 1% CDR3 sequences (p = 0.001). Furthermore, LRP1B allele frequency was negatively correlated with the top 1% CDR3 sequences (r = -0.55, p = 0.033) and positively correlated with tumor shrinkage (r = 0.68, p = 0.007). The TMR score could serve as a potential predictive biomarker for the response to immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

Clinical Association Between Immune-related Adverse Events and Treatment Efficacy in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Treated With Nivolumab-Ipilimumab-based Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy has been extensively explored for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through the pivotal phase III trials CheckMate 227 and CheckMate 9LA. However, the relationship between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab-based therapy in a real-world clinical setting remains uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 28 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who underwent treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with or without platinum-doublet chemotherapy, from February 2021 to January 2023. The primary objective was to elucidate the clinical association between irAEs and treatment efficacy associated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab-based therapy. RESULTS: Among the 28 patients, 22 (78.6%) experienced irAEs. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for patients with irAEs than for those without (p=0.0158), as was overall survival (OS) (p=0.000394). The severity of irAEs had no significant influence on PFS or OS. The objective response rate tended to be higher in patients with irAEs than in those without (50.0% versus 0.0%, respectively; p=0.0549). Multivariate analysis indicated that irAE occurrence was an independent factor for improved PFS (hazard ratio=0.2084, p=0.01383) and OS (hazard ratio=0.0857, p=0.001588). Interstitial lung disease was inferior to other irAE profiles for both PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced NSCLC experiencing irAEs demonstrated superior clinical outcomes when treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab-based therapy compared with those without irAEs. However, immune-related interstitial lung disease may be less linked with PFS and OS than other irAE profiles.

The Impact of Kinlessness on Survival in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Objectives Among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there are those who do not have a spouse, family members, or friends to support them in their cancer treatment and daily life: the kinless patients. Therefore, we designed an exploratory study of kinlessness and the prognosis of advanced NSCLC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of clinical factors and treatment and kinlessness in patients with advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EGFR/ALK) and who visited our hospital from November 2018 to February 2023. In addition to the survival analysis by kinlessness, a multivariable analysis of survival was performed for all clinical factors. In a secondary analysis, a multivariable analysis of the choice of best supportive care (BSC) was performed for all clinical factors. Results One hundred forty-four patients are included in our cohort. There were 131 patients with kin, with a median survival of 1.34 years (95% CI of 1.01-1.79 years). There were 13 patients has no kin, with a median survival of 0.53 years (95% CI 0.23-0.76 years). The log-rank analysis showed that kinless patients had significantly shorter overall survival than patients who have kin. A Cox regression analysis showed that age, distant metastasis, performance status, and kinlessness were associated with overall survival. Secondary analysis showed that there was no statistical association between kinlessness and the choice of BSC in our cohort. Conclusions Kinless patients had shorter survival than patients who have kin in our single-center, retrospective study of patients with advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown status for (EGFR/ALK). Further research to evaluate the clinical impact of kinlessness in the treatment of advanced NSCLC is needed.

Efficacy and safety of crizotinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ROS1 gene fusion: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence.

BACKGROUND: Crizotinib was approved to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene fusion in 2016. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify real-world evidence (RWE) studies and estimated the efficacy and safety of crizotinib using meta-analyses (MA) for objective response rate (ORR), real-world progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE®, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from January 2016 to March 2023 using Ovid® for published single-arm or comparative RWE studies evaluating patients (N ≥ 20) receiving crizotinib monotherapy for aNSCLC with ROS1 gene fusion. Pooled estimates for ORR and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were derived using the metafor package in R while pooled estimates for median real-world PFS (rwPFS) and OS were derived using reconstructed individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier curves. The primary analysis included all studies regardless of crizotinib line of therapy; a subgroup analysis (SA) was conducted using studies evaluating patients receiving first-line crizotinib. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were considered feasible for MA. For the primary analysis, the pooled ORR (N = 9 studies) was 70.6 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 57.0, 81.3), median rwPFS was 14.5 months (N = 11 studies), and OS was 40.2 months (N = 9 studies). In the SA, the pooled ORR (N = 4 studies) was 81.1 % (95 % CI: 76.1, 85.2) and the median rwPFS (N = 4 studies) and OS (N = 2 studies) were 18.1 and 60 months, respectively. All MAs were associated with significant heterogeneity (I2 > 25 %). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 18.7 % of patients (pooled estimate). CONCLUSION: The results from this study are consistent with clinical trial data and, taken collectively, supports crizotinib as a safe and effective treatment across different lines of therapy in patients with ROS1 aNSCLC in the real-world setting.

The significance of inflammatory markers in prognosticating the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in conjunction with chemotherapy during the primary intervention of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to scrutinize the prognostic significance of inflammatory biomarkers concerning the effectiveness and safety of combining PD-1 inhibition with chemotherapy in the management of advanced NSCLC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 206 NSCLC patients who received treatment at Qingdao Municipal Hospital. The study encompassed the acquisition of baseline clinical attributes and hematological parameters of these patients. The optimal threshold values for PLT and NLR were ascertained based on pre-treatment evaluations, with a particular focus on their association with PFS. Variables linked to PFS were subject to scrutiny through Kaplan-Meier analysis and logistic regression. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve served as the means to determine the ideal cut-off values for categorizing levels of inflammatory markers into high and low classifications. We employed Chi-square tests to evaluate the relationship between elevated and reduced baseline levels of inflammatory markers and irAE. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis disclosed that patients in the low baseline PLT group and the low NLR group exhibited a substantially more favorable prognosis in contrast to their counterparts in the high baseline PLT and high NLR groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that diminished baseline PLT and NLR levels before treatment independently foretell extended PFS. Chi-square analysis underscored a substantial correlation between baseline WBC, NEUT, LYMPH, MONO, and NLR levels and irAE. CONCLUSION: Subdued baseline PLT and NLR levels may serve as indicators of a more auspicious prognosis in patients contending with advanced NSCLC undergoing the combination of PD-1 inhibition and chemotherapy. Elevated baseline levels of inflammatory markers antedating PD-1 therapy in advanced NSCLC may be intimately interrelated with the occurrence of irAE.

Cost-effectiveness of Kang Ai injection plus chemotherapy vs. Shenqi Fuzheng injection plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two Chinese patent medicines, including Kang Ai injection and Shenqi Fuzheng injection with each combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China. Methods: From Chinese healthcare system perspective, a three state Markov model with a cycle of 3 weeks and a 10-year horizon was constructed to derive the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Since only individual patient data of progression-free survival (PFS) of Kang Ai injection group can be obtained, we extrapolated median overall survival (mOS) of Kang Ai injection group and median progression-free survival (mPFS) and mOS of Shenqi Fuzheng injection group based on published literature and methods. Then survival curves were estimated by the method of declining exponential approximation of life expectancy (DEALE), which is based on the assumption that survival follows a declining exponential function. We performed one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis to test the robustness. Additionally, a scenario analysis was adopted to investigate the impact of using best-fitting distribution for PFS curve of Kang Ai injection group on the economic conclusion. Results: The base-case result indicated that Kang Ai injection group provided 0.217 incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of $103.38 compared with Shenqi Fuzheng injection group. The ICER was $476.41/QALY, which was much lower than the willingness to pay threshold of one time the GDP per capita of China in 2022 ($12,070/QALY). Deterministic sensitivity analysis result showed that ICER was most sensitive to the changes in odds ratio (OR) value. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of base-case analysis results. The scenario analysis result showed that by using Log-Normal distribution to fit the PFS curve of Kang Ai injection group and shortening the time horizon to 5 years, the ICER was $4,081.83/QALY, which was still much lower than the willingness to pay threshold. Conclusion: Kang Ai injection combined with platinum-based chemotherapy appeared to be more cost-effective for the treatment of advanced NSCLC than Shenqi Fuzheng injection combined with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Real-world outcomes on platinum-containing chemotherapy for EGFR-mutated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with prior exposure to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Background: Front-line therapy with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard of care for treating patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with the common sensitizing EGFR exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R point mutations. However, EGFR TKI resistance inevitably develops. The optimal subsequent therapy remains to be identified, although platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens are often administered. Our objectives were to describe baseline characteristics, survival, and subsequent treatment patterns for patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation who received a platinum-based combination regimen after front-line EGFR TKI therapy. Methods: This retrospective study used a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database to select adult patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, evidence of EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation, and ECOG performance status of 0-2 who initiated platinum-containing chemotherapy, with or without concomitant immunotherapy, from 1-January-2011 to 30-June-2020 following receipt of any EGFR TKI as first-line therapy or, alternatively, a first- or second-generation EGFR TKI (erlotinib, afatinib, gefitinib, dacomitinib) as first-line therapy followed by the third-generation EGFR TKI osimertinib as second-line therapy. Data cut-off was 30-June-2022. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) after initiation of pemetrexed-platinum (n=119) or any platinum-based combination regimen (platinum cohort; n=311). Results: The two cohorts included two-thirds women (65%-66%) and 57%-58% nonsmokers; median ages were 66 and 65 years in pemetrexed-platinum and platinum cohorts, respectively. Median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.1-13.9) from pemetrexed-platinum initiation and 12.4 months (95% CI, 10.2-15.2) from platinum initiation; 12-month survival rates were 48% and 51%, respectively; 260 patients (84%) had died by the end of the study. Conclusion: The suboptimal survival outcomes recorded in this study demonstrate the unmet need to identify more effective subsequent treatment regimens for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC after EGFR TKI resistance develops.

Clinical status and perspective on the application of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a review.

The therapeutic landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been significantly improved by developing immunotherapy represented by programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Furthermore, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy is an essential treatment strategy for driver-negative advanced NSCLC, especially in a population with PD-L1 <50%, and leads to long-term survival in the entire population regardless of the PD-L1 expression status. However, specific challenges must be overcome, including how to use immunotherapy with chemotherapy in clinics. Furthermore, the application of immunotherapy with chemotherapy in populations such as elderly patients and patients with brain metastases, oligometastases, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements, and other driver gene-positive populations must be further explored. The biomarkers associated with immunotherapy and chemotherapy are still unclear, and the search for predictive biomarkers can contribute toward more precise and personalized immunotherapy. Furthermore, treatment strategies after immunotherapy and chemotherapy resistance are of significant focus clinically, and clinical studies with multiple combination therapy strategies are ongoing. Therefore, based on the reported status of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC, this study conducted a comprehensive literature review by searching keywords "PD-1 and PD-L1, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), and NSCLC" in MEDLINE, major conferences, and major clinical research projects to elucidate the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy as the current first-line treatment approach for various types of NSCLC patients. Additionally, it addresses several pressing challenges associated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, including enhancing treatment response and survival rate in specific patient populations and identifying potential biomarkers.

Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Intrathoracic Perfusion Chemotherapy Combined with immunological factor Interleukin-2 in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the gemcitabine and oxaliplatin intrathoracic perfusion chemotherapy (IPCGOR) regimen combined with interleukin-2 (IL-2) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 460 advanced NSCLC patients from the Yunnan Province Early Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Project (June 2020-October 2022), assessing the IPCGOR and IL-2 combination. Outcomes were measured based on RECIST 1.1 criteria, focusing on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (MOS), and treatment safety. Results: The treatment demonstrated an ORR of 67.4%, a DCR of 97.4%, an mPFS of 8.5 months, and an MOS of 12.5 months. 14 patients underwent successful surgery post-treatment. Common adverse reactions were manageable, with no treatment-related deaths reported. Conclusion: The IPCGOR combined with IL-2 regimen shows promising efficacy and a tolerable safety profile for advanced NSCLC. These findings suggest its potential as a reference for treating advanced NSCLC. However, the study's retrospective nature and single-center design pose limitations. Future research should focus on prospective studies, randomized controlled trials, and long-term outcome assessments, particularly in diverse patient subgroups, to further validate and refine the clinical application of this regimen.

Mycobacterium gordonae Infection in a Patient With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Mycobacterium gordonae (MG) is one of the least pathogenic nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). We report an unusual case of MG infection in a patient with newly diagnosed lung cancer. A 61-year-old woman presented with shortness of breath and weight loss. Six months prior to admission, she was diagnosed with MG infection based on positive sputum cultures and bronchioalveolar lavage. Despite anti-mycobacterial therapy, her symptoms worsened and she lost approximately 100 pounds. A transbronchial biopsy obtained one week prior to admission revealed adenocarcinoma of the lung. At admission, vital signs were normal, and a physical exam revealed bilateral crackles. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest revealed infiltrates with ground-glass opacity. The patient was admitted to the oncology service for evaluation. Our findings suggest that symptomatic individuals with positive cultures of MG should proceed with extensive workup for possible underlying lung cancer especially if not responding to anti-mycobacterial therapy.

Optimal therapeutic strategy for non-small cell lung cancer with thoracic extrathoracic metastasis: a study based on SEER database.

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with extrathoracic metastasis (EM) are a highly heterogeneous cohort. Some of these patients could benefit from primary tumor surgery. This study aimed to identify potential NSCLC patients with EM suitable for primary tumor resection and to determine the optimal therapeutic strategy. Methods: NSCLC patients with EM were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 2010 and 2015. They were stratified into subgroups with single and multi-EMs. Cox regression analysis was adopted to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the OS among patients who received different treatment modalities. Results: The univariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that advanced age, male sex, race (black), married status, squamous cell carcinoma, higher histological grade, advanced T or N stage, contralateral lung metastasis, multi-EMs, tumor size >2 cm, and lack of treatment were associated with poorer OS in patients with NSCLC (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the number of EM and treatment modalities were independent prognostic factors affecting OS (P<0.001). For patients with single EM, those who did not receive treatment and those who underwent single-agent chemotherapy, single-agent surgery, surgery combined with chemotherapy, surgery combined with radiotherapy, or surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy had median OS times of 3.0, 11.0, 12.0, 26.0, 11.0, and 25.0 months, respectively. Compared to monotherapy, combination therapy showed significant benefits for patients with single EM in NSCLC. Furthermore, patients with single EM who underwent lobectomy, bilobectomy, or pneumonectomy had significantly longer survival than those who underwent sublobar resection, even when the primary tumor size was ≤2 cm (P=0.04). Conclusions: Primary tumor surgery could benefit NSCLC patients with single EM; lobectomy was at least warranted to improve survival even for primary tumors with size ≤2 cm.

High-Throughput Antigen Microarray Identifies Longitudinal Prognostic Autoantibody for Chemoimmunotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Chemoimmunotherapy has evolved as a standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). However, inevitable drug resistance has limited its efficacy, highlighting the urgent need for biomarkers of chemoimmunotherapy. A three-phase strategy to discover, verify, and validate longitudinal predictive autoantibodies (AAbs) for aNSCLC before and after chemoimmunotherapy was employed. A total of 528 plasma samples from 267 aNSCLC patients before and after anti-PD1 immunotherapy were collected, plus 30 independent formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Candidate AAbs were firstly selected using a HuProt high-density microarray containing 21,000 proteins in the discovery phase, followed by validation using an aNSCLC-focused microarray. Longitudinal predictive AAbs were chosen for ELISA based on responders versus non-responders comparison and progression-free survival (PFS) survival analysis. Prognostic markers were also validated using immunohistochemistry and publicly available immunotherapy datasets. We identified and validated a panel of two AAbs (MAX and DHX29) as pre-treatment biomarkers and another panel of two AAbs (MAX and TAPBP) as on-treatment predictive markers in aNSCLC patients undergoing chemoimmunotherapy. All three AAbs exhibited a positive correlation with early responses and PFS (p < 0.05). The kinetics of MAX AAb showed an increasing trend in responders (p < 0.05) and a tendency to initially increase and then decrease in non-responders (p < 0.05). Importantly, MAX protein and mRNA levels effectively discriminated PFS (p < 0.05) in aNSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. Our results present a longitudinal analysis of changes in prognostic AAbs in aNSCLC patients undergoing chemoimmunotherapy.

Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with driver mutant non-small cell lung cancer and de novo brain metastases.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases can be seen at a rate of 30% in advanced stages for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Growing evidence indicates the predictive roles of driver gene mutations in the development of brain metastases (BM) in recent years, meaning that oncogene-driven NSCLC have a high incidence of BM at diagnosis. Today, 3rd generation targeted drugs with high intracranial efficacy, which can cross the blood-brain barrier, have made a positive contribution to survival for these patients with an increased propensity to BM. It is important to update the clinical and pathological factors reflected in the survival with real-life data. A multi-center, retrospective database of 306 patients diagnosed with driver mutant NSCLC and initially presented with BM between between November 2008 and September 2022 were analyzed. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 12.25 months (95% CI, 10-14.5). While 254 of the patients received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), 51 patients received chemotherapy as first line treatment. The median intracranial PFS (iPFS) was 18.5 months (95% CI, 14.8-22.2). The median overall survival (OS) was 29 months (95% CI, 25.2-33.0). It was found that having 3 or less BM and absence of extracranial metastases were significantly associated with better mOS and iPFS. The relationship between the size of BM and survival was found to be non-significant. Among patients with advanced NSCLC with de novo BM carrying a driver mutation, long-term progression-free and overall survival can be achieved with the advent of targeted agents with high CNS efficacy with more conservative and localized radiotherapy modalities.

A real-world cohort study of first-line afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Vietnam.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of first-line afatinib treatment in a real-world setting in Vietnam. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted across nine hospitals in Vietnam. Advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received afatinib as first-line therapy between April 2018 and June 2022 were included, and patient medical records were reviewed. Key outcomes were overall response rate (ORR), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and tolerability. RESULTS: A total of 343 patients on first-line afatinib were eligible for the study. EGFR exon 19 deletion (Del19) alone was detected in 46.9% of patients, L858R mutation alone in 26.3%, and other uncommon EGFR mutations, including compound mutations, in 26.8%. Patients with brain metastases at baseline were 25.4%. Patients who received 40 mg, 30 mg, and 20 mg as starting doses of afatinib were 58.6%, 39.9%, and 1.5%, respectively. The ORR was 78.1% in the overall population, 82.6% in the Del19 mutation subgroup, 73.3% in the L858R mutation subgroup, and 75.0% in the uncommon mutation subgroup (p > 0.05). The univariate and multivariate analyses indicate that the ORR increased when the starting dose was 40 mg compared to starting doses below 40 mg (83.9% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.034). The median TTF (mTTF) was 16.7 months (CI 95%: 14.8-18.5) in all patients, with a median follow-up time of 26.2 months. The mTTF was longer in patients in the common EGFR mutation subgroup (Del19/L858R) than in those in the uncommon mutation subgroup (17.5 vs. 13.8 months, p = 0.045) and in those without versus with brain metastases at baseline (17.5 vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.049). There were no significant differences in the mTTF between subgroups based on the starting dose of 40 mg and < 40 mg (16.7 vs. 16.9 months, p > 0.05). The most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade/grade ≥ 3) were diarrhea (55.4%/3.5%), rash (51.9%/3.2%), paronychia (35.3%/5.0%), and stomatitis (22.2%/1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Afatinib demonstrated clinical effectiveness and good tolerability in Vietnamese EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. In our real-world setting, administering a starting dose below 40 mg might result in a reduction in ORR; however, it might not have a significant impact on TTF.

Is cryoablation still suitable for advanced non-small cell lung cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy? A multicenter, prospective, randomized-controlled trial of eighty-seven patients.

The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of cryoablation treatment in advanced NSCLC patients who had failed first-line chemotherapy. Eighty-seven patients from ten hospitals in China were enrolled into the study, forty-four patients received cryoablation treatment plus basic treatment (experimental group), and forty-three patients had basic treatment alone (control group). Follow-up was performed once every three months until the end of the study or the death of the patient. The primary endpoints were overall and post-intervention survival; secondary endpoints included tumor markers, solid tumor efficacy, and symptom changes before and after treatment. There was no significant difference in median OS between the two groups of patients (9.0 months vs 11.2 months, P = 0.583). The disease control rate (DCR) and living quality of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group. In terms of OS, indiscriminate use of cryoablation for such patients was not beneficial, though it could improve symptoms of patients. Cryoablation had a significant effect on selected advanced NSCLC patients after the failure of first-line chemotherapy.

Redetermination of PD-L1 expression after chemio-radiation in locally advanced PDL1 negative NSCLC patients: retrospective multicentric analysis.

Background: Chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is the treatment of choice for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Several clinical trials that combine programmed cell death 1 (PD1) axis inhibitors with radiotherapy are in development for patients with LA-NSCLC. However, the effect of CRT on tumor cells programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is unknown. Methods: In this multicentric retrospective study, we analyzed paired NSCLC specimens that had been obtained pre- and post-CRT. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was studied by immunohistochemistry. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, risk of complications, and clinical relevance of performing re-biopsy after CRT in patients with PD-L1 negative LA-NSCLC. Results: Overall, 31 patients from 6 centers with PD-L1 negative LA-NSCLC were analyzed. The percentage of tumor cells with PD-L1 expression significantly increased between pre- and post-CRT specimens in 14 patients (45%). Nine patients had unchanged PD-L1 expression after CRT, in five patients the rebiopsy material was insufficient for PD-L1 analysis and in two patients no tumor cells at rebiopsy were found. The post-rebiopsy complication rate was very low (6%). All patients with positive PD-L1 re-biopsy received Durvalumab maintenance after CRT, except one patient who had a long hospitalization for tuberculosis reactivation. Median PFS of patients with unchanged or increased PD-L1 expression was 10 and 16.9 months, respectively. Conclusion: CRT administration can induce PD-L1 expression in a considerable fraction of PD-L1 negative patients at baseline, allowing them receiving the maintenance Durvalumab in Europe. Hence, after a definitive CRT, PD-L1 redetermination should be considered in patients with LA-NSCLC PD-L1 negative, to have a better selection of maintenance Durvalumab candidates.