Case report and brief literature review: possible association of secukinumab with Guillain-Barré syndrome in psoriasis.

The etiology of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) may be autoimmune. About two-thirds of patients typically experience their first symptoms within 5 days to 3 weeks after common infectious diseases, surgery, or vaccination. Infection is a triggering factor for over 50% of patients. In recent years, a growing number of studies have indicated that some immune checkpoint inhibitors and COVID-19 may also contribute to the occurrence of GBS. However, drugs are considered a rare cause of GBS. The patient in our case was a 70-year-old man who developed GBS after initiating secukinumab for psoriasis. Upon diagnosis suggesting a potential association between secukinumab and the development of GBS, as per the Naranjo adverse drug reaction (ADR) probability scale, we decided to discontinue the drug. Following this intervention, along with the administration of immunoglobulin, the patient exhibited a significant improvement in extremity weakness. The association of GBS with secukinumab treatment, as observed in this case, appears to be uncommon. The underlying mechanisms that may link secukinumab to the development of GBS are not yet fully understood and warrant further scientific inquiry and rigorous investigation. However, we hope that this report can raise greater awareness and vigilance among medical professionals to enhance the safety of patients' medication.

Clinical adverse events to dexmedetomidine: a real-world drug safety study based on the FAERS database.

Objective: Adverse events associated with dexmedetomidine were analyzed using data from the FDA's FAERS database, spanning from 2004 to the third quarter of 2023. This analysis serves as a foundation for monitoring dexmedetomidine's safety in clinical applications. Methods: Data on adverse events associated with dexmedetomidine were standardized and analyzed to identify clinical adverse events closely linked to its use. This analysis employed various signal quantification analysis algorithms, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Results: In the FAERS database, dexmedetomidine was identified as the primary suspect in 1,910 adverse events. Our analysis encompassed 26 organ system levels, from which we selected 346 relevant Preferred Terms (PTs) for further examination. Notably, adverse drug reactions such as diabetes insipidus, abnormal transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring, acute motor axonal neuropathy, and trigeminal cardiac reflex were identified. These reactions are not explicitly mentioned in the drug's specification, indicating the emergence of new signals for adverse drug reactions. Conclusion: Data mining in the FAERS database has elucidated the characteristics of dexmedetomidine-related adverse drug reactions. This analysis enhances our understanding of dexmedetomidine's drug safety, aids in the clinical management of pharmacovigilance studies, and offers valuable insights for refining drug-use protocols.

Adverse reactions to Janus kinase inhibitors: Study of their incidence and predictive factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. / Reacciones adversas a inhibidores de quinasa Janus: estudio de su incidencia y de factores predictivos en los pacientes con artritis reumatoide.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The safety profile of Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors has acquired attention due to post-marketing observed adverse drug reactions. The study focuses on the analysis of adverse reactions related to tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients, including identifying predictive factors linked to their occurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational retrospective study. Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis from a university hospital receiving JAK inhibitor treatment between September 2017 and January 2024 were included. The cumulative incidence of each adverse reaction was calculated using the Naranjo scale. Risk factors for developing adverse reactions were identified through logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-three patients were included, with 28.7% presenting adverse reaction related to JAK inhibitor treatment. The adverse drug reactions with the highest cumulative incidence were infections and gastrointestinal disorders. Infections included: upper respiratory tract (4.5%), cellulitis (3.1%), urinary tract (2.7%), herpes zoster (1.8%). Gastrointestinal disorders comprised: abdominal pain (4.0%), diarrhea (3.6%), nausea and vomiting (3.6%), gastrointestinal perforation (1.3%), diverticulitis (0.9%). Classified at 0.5% were: headache, paresthesias, skin rash, severe neutropenia, insomnia, dyspnea, hypertensive crisis. As risk factors, were identified: the treatment with a non-selective JAK inhibitor (OR adjusted: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.15-14.10; P=.029) and older age (OR adjusted: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05; P=.036). CONCLUSIONS: Infections and gastrointestinal disorders represented the adverse reactions related to JAK inhibitor treatment with the highest cumulative incidence, with risk factors for their occurrence being non-selective JAK inhibitor treatment and older age of the patient.

Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events associated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibodies: a World Health Organization pharmacovigilance study.

PURPOSE: To analyze cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (ADRs) after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; aflibercept, bevacizumab, brolucizumab, and ranibizumab) treatment. SUBJECTS: VigiBase, a World Health Organization (WHO) global safety report database DESIGN: Pharmacovigilance study METHODS: The individual-case-safety reports (ICSR) of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ADRs after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment were compared with those reported in the full database. From 2004 to 2023, 23,129 ADRs after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and 25,015,132 ADRs associated with any drug (full database). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information components (IC) were calculated, and the 95% lower credibility interval endpoint of the information component (IC025) was used for disproportionate Bayesian reporting. Inter-drug comparisons were performed using the ratio of odd ratio (rOR). RESULTS: Compared with the full database, anti-VEGFs were associated with an increased reporting of myocardial infarction (IC025 0.75; ROR: 1.78 [95% CI 1.70-1.86]), angina pectoris (IC025 0.53; ROR: 1.61 [95% CI 1.47-1.77]), arrythemias including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ventricular fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia (all IC025 >0, ROR>1), hypertension (IC025 2.22; ROR: 4.91 [95% CI 4.82-5.01]), and hypertensive crisis (IC025 1.97; ROR: 4.49 [95% CI 4.07-4.97]). Moreover, anti-VEGFs were associated with a higher reporting of cerebrovascular ADRs such as cerebral infarction (IC025 4.34; ROR: 23.19 [95% CI 22.10-24.34]), carotid artery stenosis (IC025 1.85; ROR: 5.24 [95% CI 3.98-6.89]), cerebral hemorrhage (IC025 2.29; ROR: 5.38 [95% CI 5.03-5.76]), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (IC025 1.98; ROR: 4.81 [95% CI 4.14-5.6]). Inter-drug comparison indicated that compared to ranibizumab, patients with aflibercept showed overall under-reporting of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ADRs such as myocardial infarction (rOR 0.55 [95% CI 0.49-0.52]), atrial fibrillation (rOR 0.28 [95% CI 0.23-0.35]), cerebrovascular accident (rOR, 0.15 [95% CI 0.14-0.17]), and cerebral hemorrhage (rOR, 0.51 [95% CI 0.40-0.65]). CONCLUSIONS: In this pharmacovigilance case-noncase study, significantly increased reporting of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ADRs were identified after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment. While ranibizumab may exhibit superior systemic safety regarding its biological characteristics, it is crucial not to overlook the occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ADRs considering its higher reporting rate than bevacizumab or aflibercept.

Development and internal validation of a model for predicting cefoperazone/sulbactam-associated coagulation disorders in Chinese inpatients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The use of cefoperazone/sulbactam (CPZ/SAM) could commonly cause vitamin K-dependent coagulation disorders and even hemorrhage sometimes. However, there is a lack of prediction tools estimating the risk for this. This study aimed at developing and internally validating a model for predicting CPZ/SAM-associated coagulation disorders in Chinese inpatients. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in 11,092 adult inpatients admitted to a Chinese general hospital between 2020 and 2021 and treated with CPZ/SAM. Patients with CPZ/SAM-associated coagulation disorders were identified through the Adverse Drug Events Active Surveillance and Assessment System-II and subsequent manual evaluation. Controls were selected from eligible patients who didn't develop coagulation disorders after CPZ/SAM therapy, with a 1:1 propensity score matching. The final predictors were obtained by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Internal validation and calibration for the model were performed using 1000 bootstrap resamplings. RESULTS: 258 patients were identified as CPZ/SAM-associated coagulation disorders in 2184 patients eligible for inclusions and exclusions and the incidence was 11.8%. A final population of 252 cases and 252 controls was included for model development and validation. Malnutrition (OR = 2.41 (1.56-3.77)), history of recent bleeding (OR = 1.95 (1.32-2.90)), treatment duration (OR = 1.10 (1.07-1.14)), combination with carbapenems (OR = 4.43 (1.85-11.88)), and serum creatinine (OR = 1.01 (1.00-1.01)) were identified as final predictors. The model showed good discrimination, calibration, and clinical practicality, with the validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve being 0.723 (0.683-0.770). CONCLUSIONS: The model with good performance quantifies the risk for CPZ/SAM-associated coagulation disorders, and may support individual assessment and interventions to mitigate the risk after external validation.

Frequency, Characteristics, and Preventability of Adverse Drug Reactions in Perioperative Neurosurgery: Analysis Over 11 Years.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the importance of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), little is known about their role in perioperative neurosurgery. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of ADRs in perioperative neurosurgery and clarify the characteristics, severity, preventability, and risk factors of ADRs. METHODS: Data for all patients who underwent neurosurgical procedures over an 11-year period were analyzed. During the study period, 3648 surgical procedures were performed for 2695 patients. Demographic and clinical information documented included medical history, allergic history, diagnosis, surgical method, suspected drugs, concomitant medications, and drug details. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent parameters that were correlated with ADRs. RESULTS: In total, 467 ADRs (18.3% ADRs/all neurosurgical procedures) were experienced by 401 patients. Anticonvulsants were associated with the highest number of ADRs (16.0%), followed by antibiotics (14.7%). Patients with ADRs were older than patients without ADRs (P<0.01). The total number of drugs in patients with ADRs was 8.8±3.6, compared to 5.2±2.4 for patients without ADRs (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in sex, allergic history, severe renal dysfunction (eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73 m2), hypertension, diabetes, urgency of surgery, and type of surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that a high total number of drugs (odds=3.2; 95%CI 1.9-5.1) and older age (odds=2.1; 95%CI 1.3-3.8) were independent risk factors for ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of suspected and severe ADRs was higher than expected. Polypharmacy and older age were independent risk factors for ADRs in perioperative neurosurgery. To decrease ADRs during perioperative neurosurgery, polypharmacy must be discouraged, especially among older adult patients.

An Unexpected Phenomenon: A Case of Citalopram-Induced Dyskinesia.

Dyskinetic movements are characterized as hyperkinetic, repetitive movements of the extremities, facial, and oral musculature, most associated with prolonged dopamine D2 receptor blockade. In rare instances, dyskinetic movements can be brought on by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) usage via an indirect D2 blockade mechanism, mimicking the D2 blockade observed with dopamine receptor blocking agents (DRBAs), such as in first-generation antipsychotics. This mimicked D2 blockade by SSRIs is said to be due to increased tonic inhibition by serotonin on dopaminergic neurons in the dopaminergic pathways of the brain, specifically the nigrostriatal pathway. In this case report, we look at a patient with a history of cerebral palsy who developed acute dyskinetic movements after short-term citalopram usage. The objective is to bring attention to the possible extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) of SSRI usage.

Rash caused by lurasidone in old chinese patient with bipolar disorder: case-based review.

BACKGROUND: Rash is one of common adverse drug reaction and which have been reported in typical and atypical antipsychotics. Reports of lurasidone induced skin reactions are sparse. In this study, we report a case of rash caused by lurasidone. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old man with bipolar disorder (BD) who is treated by lurasidone. However, the patient presents a rash all over after lurasidone dose increasing from 40 mg/day to 60 mg/day. With the diagnosis of drug induced rash, lurasidone was discontinued, and the rash complete disappears within 2 weeks. In addition, all case reports about antipsychotics associated rash were reviewed by searching English and Chinese database including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang database. A total of 139 articles contained 172 patients were included in our study. The literature review and our case suggest that the cutaneous adverse events caused by antipsychotic drugs should not be ignored, particularly for the patient who was first use or at dose increasing of antipsychotic. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we report a case of lurasidone related rash and review rash caused by antipsychotics. Psychiatrists should be alert to the possibility of the rash caused by antipsychotics, especially the patient was first use of antipsychotics or the antipsychotic dose was increasing.

Consumers' knowledge and experiences of adverse drug reaction reporting in Australia: a national survey.

This study aimed to investigate the current knowledge and experiences of consumers in Australia on adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting and their reasons for reporting or not reporting ADRs, with a focus on the use of digital tools for ADR reporting. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among adults who had taken medicine in Australia. A structured questionnaire with multiple choice or Likert scale responses with an option for participants to provide free-text responses and pretested for face validity was used. Consumer characteristics, knowledge, and ADR reporting practices were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 544 survey responses were included in the analysis. The majority of respondents were women (68%), and 22% were aged between 65 and 74 years. Fifty-eight percent (n = 317) of respondents knew that they could report ADRs to either the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), state or territory government health department, or healthcare professionals. Three-quarters (n = 405) of respondents stated that they had experienced an ADR; of these, 36% reported an ADR to either the TGA, state or territory government health department, or healthcare professionals. Among those who reported ADRs, 58% were unaware that they could use digital tools to report ADRs. The main reason for not reporting was that they did not think the ADR was serious enough to report (39%). CONCLUSION: Over half of consumers knew that they could report ADR; however, improved consumer awareness about using digital tools for ADR reporting and increased ADR reporting is needed.

Retrospective analysis of neoplasms in patients using angiotensin receptor blockers.

In recent years, regulatory agencies have raised concerns about the presence of potentially carcinogenic substances in certain formulations of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs). Specifically, nitrosamines and azido compounds have been identified in some ARB products. Nitrosamines are known to have carcinogenic properties and are associated with an increased risk of neoplasms. Spontaneous safety reports from the EudraVigilance Data Analysis System (EVDAS) database were analyzed to investigate cases of neoplasms associated with ARBs. A disproportionality analysis was conducted, calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a case/non-case approach for each ARB drug. The EVDAS database contained 68,522 safety reports related to ARBs (including Azilsartan, Candesartan, Irbesartan, Olmesartan, Losartan, Valsartan, and Telmisartan), among which 3,396 (5%) cases were associated with neoplasms. The majority of these cases were reported in Germany (11.9%), followed by France (9.7%). Approximately 70% of the reports were submitted by healthcare professionals such as physicians and nurses. Among the ARBs, valsartan had the highest ROR for neoplasm (ROR 1.949, 95% CI 1.857-2.046). This association remained significant when comparing ARBs with other classes of antihypertensive drugs, including ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics. Our study identifies a possible signal of an association between ARBs, particularly valsartan, and the risk of neoplasms. However, further observational and analytical studies are necessary to confirm these findings and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Knowledge, attitude and practices about pharmacovigilance activities among hospital nurses: a multicentre cross-sectional survey.

Background: The national pharmacovigilance (PV) system has been established in many countries worldwide following the thalidomide tragedy. Nurses have an important role in recognising and reporting any Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR); however, their role has not been widely explored, particularly in Southeast Asian countries. Aims: To assess the knowledge, attitudes and practice (KAP) about PV activities, along with barriers and facilitators that affect ADR reporting among hospital nurses in Malaysia. The present study also explores the relationship between demographic characteristics and predictors of KAP among hospital nurses in Malaysia. Methods: A multicentre, questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study was conducted in March-May 2021, among nurses working at tertiary care hospitals in Malaysia. Results: The mean KAP score of study participants was 57 ± 11. Overall participants had poor ADR knowledge (37.4%), and poor reporting practices (48.9%). Age >30 years (AOR = 2.7 (1.13-6.8), p = 0.02), and working experience of greater than 10 years (AOR = 2.44 (1.08-5.52), p = 0.03), were significantly associated with good ADR knowledge and reporting practices among study participants. Conclusions: In summary, study findings offer valuable insight for developing targeted interventions and formal training to improve nurses' ADR knowledge and reporting practices. Addressing gaps in these areas can enhance patient safety and overall healthcare quality.

Incidence of side effects of antituberculosis drugs and their related factors in northern Iran: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Antituberculosis drugs may cause mild, moderate or severe adverse drug reactions (ADR) leading to poor compliance. Description of the pattern of ADR and their related factors can help tuberculosis (TB) control program as part of the WHO programs. This study aims to investigate the incidence of ADR and associated factors among TB patients in northern Iran. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. The required information, including year of diagnosis, age, gender, residence area, nationality, HIV co-morbidity, history of anti TB treatment and ADR, was obtained from the Deputy of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Iran. All data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 software. Results: Out of 3903 TB patients, 136 (3.5%) experienced major ADR. The incidence of ADR for men and women as well as for those with and without previous treatment history were 3.9% vs. 3.3% and 5.3% vs. 3.4%, respectively (p>0.05). Multiple logistic regression models showed a higher chance of ADR among those aged over 59 compared with those aged under 29 (OR=2.63, 95% confidence interval: 1.54-4.49). Conclusions: Age over 59 can be considered a risk factor for ADR with anti-TB drug administration.

Causality, Severity, Preventability and Predictability Assessments Scales for Adverse Drug Reactions: A Review.

The pharmacovigilance program of India (PvPI), after its inception, has been reliably acquiring force in bringing issues to light among the masses, healthcare professionals, the pharma industry, and clinical staff at hospitals. Adverse drug reactions are unintended events that occur after exposure to a drug, biological product, or medical device, and they may result in morbidity and mortality. It is critical to monitor the safety of drugs during the post-marketing phase to find long-term and rare ADRs, as well as ADRs in special populations and patients with co-morbidities that are not usually included during clinical trials. The definitive objective of pharmacovigilance is to collate data and analyze it. Assessing the causality between ADRs and drugs is necessary to decrease the occurrence of ADRs and to reduce the risk of drug-related ADRs. ADRs may lead to increased morbidity, increased hospital stays, and increased cost of treatment, resulting in compromised patient safety. Causality assessment is the evaluation of the likelihood that a particular treatment is the cause of an observed adverse event and establishing a causal association between a drug and a drug reaction is necessary to prevent further recurrences. Numerous methods available for establishing a causal association between the drug and adverse events have been broadly classified into clinical judgment or global introspection, algorithms, and probabilistic methods. These include the Swedish method, World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scale, Naranjo's algorithm, Kramer algorithm, Jones algorithm, Karch algorithm, Bégaud algorithm, Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee guidelines, Bayesian Adverse Reaction Diagnostic Instrument, and so on. Despite various methods available, none of the causality assessment tools have been universally accepted as the gold standard. Naranjo's algorithm and WHO-UMC scales are, however, the most commonly used. Similarly, for preventability and severity assessment of ADRs, the Schumock and Thornton scale and Hartwig and Siegel's scale are most commonly used. Hence, we reviewed different tools and methods available to assess the causality, preventability, and severity of ADRs.

Clinical Profile of Patients with Lichenoid Drug Eruption: A Observational Study.

Background: Lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) is an uncommon cutaneous adverse drug reaction, where a variety of drugs used in day-to-day clinical practice have been implicated. Objective: To describe the clinico-demographic characteristics of patients with LDE and to identify the most likely drugs involved. Methods: In this prospective, observational study, consecutive patients with LDE presenting to the dermatology department of a tertiary teaching hospital were included. The clinico-demographic profile of patients with LDE and implicated drugs was noted. Treatment of drug reaction along with outcome was also documented. Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale was used for causality assessment of the drug reactions. A thorough literature review on LDE was also undertaken due to the paucity of existing literature. Results: A total of 15 patients (11 males and 4 females) with LDE were evaluated. Their age ranged from 37 to 61 years, with a mean of 51.53 ± 7.59 years. Anti-hypertensive medications (40%) were the most common culprit agent, followed by antitubercular drugs (33.4%), anti-diabetic agents (13.3%), and others (13.3%). The latent period (time from drug initiation to the appearance of a cutaneous eruption) varied from 15 days to 6 months (mean 2.2 months). Cutaneous involvement was generalized in 73.4% and photo-distributed lesions in 26.6%. Drug provocation test was done to identify the culprit drug. According to the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale, one-third of LDEs were "definite," whereas two-thirds were designated as "probable." Conclusion: LDE is more common in the elderly population. The latent period is comparatively longer in LDE than in other common drug reactions. Prompt recognition and withdrawal of suspected drug are essential to minimize disease morbidity.

The Phenytoin Ataxia Enigma Unveiled ''A Case Report''.

Background: Phenytoin (PHT) has been approved for the treatment of epilepsy. It belongs to the category of medications with a limited therapeutic window and requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). PTH has been observed to induce a variety of Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including ataxia, dystonia, nystagmus, dyskinesia, etc. Phenytoin-induced ataxia is an uncommonly observed ADR of Phenytoin whose reports are extremely limited. Case: Herein, we present a case report of a 16-year-old Asian patient with a past history of epilepsy that was admitted to a tertiary care hospital due to the development of ataxia, giddiness, and vomiting when taking Phenytoin in addition to Oxcarbazepine, Clobazam, and Levetiracetam to treat seizures. On admission, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings revealed bilateral variable cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lesions in the parieto-occipital region of the periventricular area (periventricular leukomalacia). Additionally, serum Phenytoin levels were observed to be in the toxic range (40 µg/mL) due to which physicians confirmed the ADR to be due to Phenytoin toxicity. Thus, the Phenytoin drug was discontinued in the patient gradually and he was continued on clobazam, oxcarbazepine, and brivaracetam which led to reversal of the ADR in the patient. Conclusion: In this case, ataxia resulted from Phenytoin overdose, as confirmed by MRI and serum tests suggesting that TDM of Phenytoin is essential to prevent ADRs. Given the scarcity of ataxia cases caused by Phenytoin, awareness is lacking within the scientific community. Our aim is to provide insights to promote better monitoring and patient-centered treatment outcomes for epileptic patients.

Pembrolizumab-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in a Vietnamese patient with nonsmall-cell lung cancer.

Chemoimmunotherapy is an effective therapy for an individual with nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without anaplastic lymphoma kinase or epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. However, it can also be related to adverse cutaneous reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) with high morbidities and mortality rates. We present a case of a 65-year-old male with NSCLC who underwent first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and pembrolizumab, which was later followed by a second cycle of the same therapies. The patient developed a fever and rash 12 days after the second cycle. Pembrolizumab was strongly suspected as the culprit medication because cutaneous reactions to this drug have been frequently reported and threw other medications used as less likely candidates. This is the first case reported in Vietnam of SJS/TEN related to pembrolizumab and contributes to our knowledge of severe skin reactions associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Comprehensive signal detection of delirium-associated medication using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

OBJECTIVE: Several medications are associated with delirium; however, studies with adequate statistical power are limited, and it is difficult to determine the effects of the various concomitant medications used in clinical practice. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety signals of delirium-associated drugs using a spontaneous adverse event reporting system. METHOD: The JAPIC AERS (Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System pre-processed by the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center) was used for the analysis in this pharmacovigilance study. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) for delirium was adjusted for using multivariate logistic regression analysis with sex, age, indication, and melatonin receptor agonist use, and 22 drug categories were targeted as covariates. RESULTS: After excluding patients with missing information, 7,527,568 patients were included in the study. Delirium signals were detected even after adjusting for covariates in 17 drug categories, including benzodiazepines (adjusted ROR, 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-1.89), opioids (adjusted ROR, 4.42; 95% CI, 4.21-4.64), and tricyclic antidepressants (adjusted ROR, 2.44; 95% CI, 2.20-2.71). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that many drug classes, such as benzodiazepines, are independent risk factors for delirium and strengthen the evidence of an association between delirium and medications.