Radiographic graft changes following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone compared with composite grafts: a one-year single-blind randomized controlled trial.

This study evaluated radiographic graft changes following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with (A) autogenous bone, (B) 1:1 autogenous bone and deproteinized porcine bone mineral, or (C) 1:1 autogenous bone and biphasic bone graft material. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to groups A, B, and C (20 in each). CBCT scans were obtained at enrolment, after surgery (T1), after prosthetic rehabilitation (T2), and 1 year after implant loading (T3). Significant decreases in graft volume (3D) and graft height (2D) from T1 to T3 were observed in all groups (P < 0.05). However, at T2 and T3, graft volume was significantly higher in group B than in groups A and C (P < 0.05), and graft height was significantly higher in group B than in group A (P < 0.05). Bone density increased significantly from T1 to T2 in all groups (P < 0.001). However, bone density was significantly higher in group B than in groups A and C, at T2 and T3 (P < 0.05). No significant correlation between graft volume or height and implant protrusion length or residual bone height was found. In conclusion, 1:1 autogenous bone and porcine bone resulted in significantly higher graft volume, height, and bone density when compared with autogenous bone or a 1:1 ratio of autogenous bone and biphasic bone. However the higher graft volume, height, and bone density did not appear to lead to improved outcomes at 1 year of functional loading when compared to the other groups.

Clinical evaluation of implants placed within or beyond the boundaries of the alveolar ridge preservation: a retrospective case series with 10 weeks of observations in 28 patients.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of implant vertical positioning within alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) sites on implant stability quotient (ISQ) values, which were measured 10 weeks post-implantation. METHODS: Patients who underwent ARP using collagenized deproteinized bovine bone mineral, followed by implant placement in the posterior area, were divided into 2 groups: the within-ARP group and the beyond-ARP group. In the within-ARP group, osteotomy and implant placement occurred within the ARP boundary. In contrast, in the beyond-ARP group, these procedures were performed beyond the ARP boundary, incorporating 3 mm of pristine bone at the implant's apex. Bone quality was assessed by tactile sense, and both insertion torque during implant surgery and ISQ values at 10 weeks post-implant surgery were measured. Multiple linear regression analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were used to explore the relationship between insertion torque and ISQ values. RESULTS: In total, 30 ARP sites in 28 patients were analyzed. There was no significant difference in bone quality, as determined by tactile sense, between the within-ARP and beyond-ARP groups. At the time of implant placement, the beyond-ARP group exhibited a higher insertion torque (33.33±13.39 Ncm) compared to the within-ARP group (17.08±11.17 Ncm). However, the ISQ values were similar between the 2 groups 10 weeks after implant placement. A positive correlation between insertion torque and ISQ values was confirmed at 10 weeks post-implant. CONCLUSIONS: The engagement of pristine bone may facilitate high insertion torque during the placement of implants in ARP sites. Nevertheless, by 10 weeks post-implantation, the ISQ values were found to be comparable, irrespective of the implant's position.

New Guidelines for the Treatment of the Alveolar Septum in Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration Technique Associated with Osseodensification: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Achieving initial implant stability at the molar extraction site can be challenging due to bone width, quality, and anatomical limitations like the maxillary sinus and inferior alveolar nerve. The implant placement should achieve precise centralization with the interradicular septum to facilitate implant stabilization and preservation/regeneration of the alveolar ridge post-extraction with bone grafting. Immediate non-occlusal crown placement aids peri-implant tissue maturation for the desired outcome. This retrospective series introduces guidelines for treating sockets with alveolar septum types. The approach involves immediate dentoalveolar restoration (IDR) and osseodensification (OD) with an autogenous graft for bone preservation. METHODS: A new protocol for the treatment of the molar interradicular septum during immediate implant placement and/or alveolar ridge preservation/reconstruction was applied in 12 cases. Preoperative and postoperative cone-beam computed tomographic examinations were performed. Socket width was measured and compared between timepoints. RESULTS: The mean preoperative and postoperative (mean, 23.58 ± 9.70 months) socket widths were 9.51 ± 0.40 and 11.16 ± 0.30 mm, respectively (17.35% increase; p <0.05). CONCLUSION: IDR with OD is a predictable approach to the treatment of molar sockets during implant placement.

In vivo experimental study comparing alveolar ridge preservation versus guided bone regeneration after unassisted socket healing at intact and damaged sites in narrow alveolar ridges.

BACKGROUND: To compare bone regeneration and dimensional alteration of alveolar ridge at intact and damaged extraction sockets after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) and implant placement versus unassisted socket healing followed by guided bone regeneration (GBR) with simultaneous implant placement. METHODS: In 6 beagle dogs, 3 types of extraction sockets in the mandible were created: (1) intact sockets, (2) 1-wall defect sockets and (3) 2-wall defect sockets. The sockets were allocated to undergo either (1) ARP and implant placement 8 weeks later (ARP group) or (2) GBR with simultaneous implant placement after 8 weeks of unassisted socket healing (GBR group). After an additional healing period of 8 weeks, bone regeneration and dimensional changes were evaluated radiographically and histologically. RESULTS: GBR showed superior bone formation and greater bone gains compared to ARP, regardless of the initial extraction-socket configuration. Although ARP maintained the preexisting alveolar ridge dimensions, peri-implant bone defects were still detected at 8 weeks of follow-up. Histomorphometric analyses confirmed that GBR increased dimensions of the alveolar ridge compared to baseline, and the augmentation and bone regeneration were greater with GBR than with ARP. CONCLUSION: Early implant placement with ARP can mitigate alveolar ridge changes in the narrow alveolar ridge. However, early implant placement with simultaneous GBR creates the conditions for enhanced bone regeneration around the implant and greater ridge augmentation compared to ARP, irrespective of the extraction-socket configuration.

Fish scale-derived hydroxyapatite for alveolar ridge preservation.

Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction poses significant challenges for future dental restorations. This study investigated the efficacy of fish scale-derived hydroxyapatite (FSHA) as a socket preservation graft material to maintain alveolar bone volume and architecture. FSHA was extracted from *Labeo rohita* fish scales and characterized using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis. In vitro, biocompatibility and osteogenic potential were assessed using Saos-2 human osteosarcoma cells. Cell viability, migration, and proliferation were evaluated using MTT and scratch assays. In vivo performance was assessed in a rat model, and FSHA was compared to a commercial xenograft (Osseograft) and ungrafted controls. Histological analysis was performed at 8-week post-implantation to quantify new bone formation. FTIR confirmed the purity and homogeneity of FSHA. In vitro, FSHA enhanced Saos-2 viability, migration, and proliferation compared to controls. In vivo, FSHA demonstrated superior bone regeneration compared to Osseograft and ungrafted sites, with balanced graft resorption and new bone formation. Histological analysis revealed an active incorporation of FSHA into new bone, with minimal gaps and ongoing remodeling. Approximately 50%-60% of FSHA was resorbed by 8 weeks, closely matching the rate of new bone deposition. FSHA stimulated more bone formation in the apical socket region than in coronal areas. In conclusion, FSHA is a promising biomaterial for alveolar ridge preservation, exhibiting excellent biocompatibility, osteogenic potential, and balanced resorption. Its ability to promote robust bone regeneration highlights its potential as an effective alternative to currently used graft materials in socket preservation procedures.

Survival Rates of Short Dental Implants (≤6 mm) Used as an Alternative to Longer (>6 mm) Implants for the Rehabilitation of Posterior Partial Edentulism: A Systematic Review of RCTs.

Short dental implants have been proposed as an alternative treatment option to bone regeneration procedures for the rehabilitation of resorbed alveolar ridges. The aim of this paper was to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short implants (≤6 mm) and longer implants (>6 mm) in atrophic alveolar ridges in terms of implant survival rates, peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL), prevalence of peri-implantitis and technical complications. A thorough electronic search was performed until September 2023. RCTs with follow-up of at least 1-year post-loading comparing short implants with rough surfaces to longer implants in the posterior jaws of systemically and periodontally healthy, partially edentulous adults were considered. Studies with incomplete information on the number of patients, follow-up or definition of "short implants" were excluded. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used for Risk of bias assessment. Fixed-effects meta-analysis of the selected studies was applied to compare the outcome variables. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed, on the basis of within-study comparisons. In total, 16 articles were selected for meta-analysis and incorporated 408 short implants and 475 longer implants inserted in 317 and 388 patients, respectively. The survival rates of longer implants in pristine or augmented bone were significantly increased compared to short implants (95%CI: 2-5%, p < 0.001). Standard-length implants displayed increased, although non-statistically significant MBL (95%CI: -0.17-0.04, p > 0.05), and prevalence of peri-implantitis (95%CI: 0-5%, p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between short and long implants in terms of technical complications (implant-level 95%CI: -4-6%, p > 0.05). Short implants represent a promising alternative treatment option for the rehabilitation of posterior jaws to avoid additional bone augmentation procedures. Nonetheless, they should be selected cautiously due to a potentially limited survival rate compared to longer implants. A major limitation of this study is the variability in the included studies regarding sample size, patient profile, type of bone, loading protocol, definition of peri-implantitis, among others. This study received no external funding. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023485514).

Ridge Preservation Combined With Open Barrier Membrane Technique in Case of Postextractive Oroantral Communication: A Case Series Retrospective Study.

After dental extraction, a physiological phenomenon of reabsorption of the dentoalveolar process is triggered, especially if periradicular lesions are present, which can sometimes be associated with oroantral communication in the upper posterior maxilla. To investigate a minimally invasive approach, 19 patients undergoing tooth extraction in the posterosuperior maxilla were recruited. All cases presented an oroantral communication with a diameter of 2-5 mm after tooth extraction and the alveolar process and, in some cases, with a partial defect of 1 or more bony walls. In these cases, a single surgical procedure was used to preserve the alveolar ridge using an open barrier technique with an exposed dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. The bottom of the extraction socket was filled with a collagen fleece. The residual bone process was reconstructed using a biomaterial based on carbonate-apatite derived from porcine cancellous bone. After 6 months, all patients were recalled and subjected to radiographic control associated with an implant-prosthetic rehabilitation plan. Data relating to the sinus health status and the average height and thickness of the regenerated bone were collected. Radiographic evaluation verified the integrity of the maxillary sinus floor with new bone formation, detecting a vertical bone dimension between 3.1 mm and 7.4 mm (average 5.13 ± 1.15 mm) and a horizontal thickness between 4.2 mm and 9.6 mm (average 6.86 ± 1.55 mm). The goal of this study was to highlight the advantage of managing an oroantral communication and, simultaneously, obtain the preservation and regeneration of the alveolar bone crest. The open barrier technique appears to be effective for the minimally invasive management of oroantral communication up to 5 mm in diameter in postextraction sites, with a good regeneration of hard and soft tissue.

Internal Allo-Cortical Tenting: A Modified Ridge Split Technique in Three-Dimensional Ridge Augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) alveolar ridge deficiencies necessitate horizontal and vertical bone reconstruction for optimal implant positioning. Despite several available techniques, achieving desired augmentation outcomes remains challenging. This case study aims to present a modified ridge split technique for bone reconstruction in both horizontal and vertical dimensions. METHODS AND RESULTS: The proposed technique was used to reconstruct the horizontal and vertical ridge defect from removing a previously failed implant. This technique includes placing a cortical allograft plate as an internal tent in the split ridge. A portion of the plate was inserted into the ridge, while the other part was placed in the coronal of the vertical defect. Additional guided bone regeneration (GBR) was performed around the tented plate on both the buccal and lingual sides. After five months, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) revealed sufficient bone formation in horizontal and vertical dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present case study, internal cortical tenting would be a reliable method for 3D bone reconstruction in cases where the ridge split is feasible.

The effect of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) versus freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) used in alveolar ridge preservation on the peri-implant soft and hard tissues: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of alveolar ridge preservation on bone regeneration and tissue healing has been thoroughly documented in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the peri-implant soft and hard tissue changes after alveolar ridge preservation using either platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) or freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) over a 12-month period following the prosthetic loading of implants. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 40 individuals were recruited for alveolar ridge preservation using (1) FDBA or (2) PRF in incisal/premolar areas. At two follow-up sessions (six- and 12-months post-implant insertion), radiographic imaging and clinical examinations assessed marginal bone loss and soft tissue factors, including gingival recession and bleeding on probing. The differences between study groups were analyzed using Generalized estimating Equations, the Binary logistic regression model, and Cochran's Q test. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference regarding gingival recession at both follow-up evaluations; values in the PRF group were considerably lower compared to the FDBA group (p < 0.05). The mean values for vertical marginal bone loss and bleeding on probing showed no significant differences between the two study groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Except for gingival recession, applying PRF yielded comparable clinical results to FDBA after one year of implant loading and could be recommended as a potential biomaterial for alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extractions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The research protocol was registered in the Protocol Registration and Results System on 13/08/2021, available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT05005377).

Tomographic assessment of bone changes in atrophic maxilla treated by split-crest technique and dental implants with platelet-rich fibrin and NanoBone® versus platelet-rich fibrin alone: Randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the clinical benefits of adding NanoBone® with split-crest technique and simultaneous implant placement covered with platelet-rich fibrin membrane in horizontally deficient maxillary ridges in terms of crestal and horizontal bone changes and patient morbidity. METHODS: Forty patients indicated for maxillary ridge splitting and simultaneous implant placement were assigned randomly to the study groups: control group (Platelet Rich Fibrin membrane) and test group (Platelet Rich Fibrin membrane + Nanobone®). The Cone Beam Computed Tomography Fusion technique was utilized to assess crestal and horizontal bone changes after five months of the surgical procedure. Patient morbidity was recorded for one week post-surgical. RESULTS: Five months post-surgical, buccal crestal bone resorption was 1.26 ± 0.58 mm for the control group and 1.14 ± 0.63 mm for the test group. Lingual crestal bone resorption was 1.40 ± 0.66 mm for the control group and 1.47 ± 0.68 mm for the test group. Horizontal bone width gain was 1.46 ± 0.44 mm for the control group and 1.29 ± 0.73 mm for the test group. There was no significant statistical difference between study groups regarding crestal and horizontal bone changes and patient morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The tomographic assessment of NanoBone® addition in this study resulted in no statistically significant difference between study groups regarding crestal and horizontal bone changes and patient morbidity. More randomized controlled clinical trials on gap fill comparing different bone grafting materials versus no grafting should be conducted. GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02836678, 13th January 2017.

Comparison of the success rate and marginal bone loss of implants placed simultaneously with either bone expansion or ridge splitting in maxillary sites: a prospective non-randomized study.

This study was performed to compare the amount of marginal bone loss (MBL) and the success rate of implants placed following maxillary ridge expansion with two surgical techniques. A non-randomized prospective study was designed. The patients underwent either bone expansion or ridge splitting, and simultaneous implant placement. The implants were loaded according to the delayed loading protocol with single crowns. Each study group included 35 implants placed in 31 patients. One year after loading, the implant success rate was 100 % in both groups. The median MBL was 1.00 mm in both groups (interquartile range 0.10 mm in the bone expansion group and 0.30 mm in the ridge splitting group) (no significant difference, P = 0.749). The median MBL around implants placed in sites with D2, D3, and D4 density bone was 1.40 mm, 1.00 mm, and 0.80 mm in the expansion group and 1.50 mm, 1.00 mm, and 0.85 mm in the splitting group, respectively. There was a significant difference in MBL between the different bone density types within both groups (P < 0.001). In conclusion, no significant difference in the amount of MBL or the success rate was observed between implants placed simultaneously with ridge splitting and those placed simultaneously with bone expansion, in the maxilla.

Modified Palatal Roll Flap: A Novel Technique for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation.

The Abrams' palatal roll technique has undergone significant changes over time and is routinely utilized to widen peri-implant soft tissues in the maxillary aesthetic zone. The described technique involves the use of a de-epithelized pedicled connective tissue flap from the palate and rolling it under the labial oral mucosa to increase the soft tissue bulk. It is an easy and efficient technique that improves gingival thickness and contour in the aesthetic region and is a great substitute for areas lacking gingival soft tissue. Furthermore, this technique eliminates the need for a second surgical site to harvest the connective tissue graft for soft tissue augmentation. This study reports a clinical case where the modified roll technique was used for horizontal ridge augmentation.

Soft-tissue volume augmentation using a connective tissue graft and a volume-stable collagen matrix with polydeoxyribonucleotide for immediate implant placement: a pilot study in a dog model.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were 1) to investigate the effects of a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX) on soft-tissue volume gain in the immediate implant placement protocol, and 2) to determine whether polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) can enhance the effects of a VCMX. METHODS: Dental implants were placed in 4 mongrel dogs immediately after extracting the distal roots of their third and fourth mandibular premolars. The gap between the implant and the buccal bone plate was filled with synthetic bone substitute particles. The following soft-tissue augmentation modalities were applied buccally: 1) control (no augmentation), 2) SCTG, 3) VCMX, and 4) VCMX/PDRN. After 4 months, histomorphometric analysis was performed. Tissue changes were evaluated using superimposed standard tessellation language (STL) files. RESULTS: Wound dehiscence was found in more than half of the test groups, but secondary wound healing was successfully achieved in all groups. Histomorphometrically, tissue thickness was favored in group SCTG at or above the implant platform level (IP), and group SCTG and the groups with VCMX presented similar tissue thickness below the IP. However, the differences in such thickness among the groups were minor. The keratinized tissue height was greater in group VCMX/PDRN than in groups SCTG and VCMX. Superimposing the STL files revealed a decrease in soft-tissue volume in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Wound dehiscence after soft-tissue volume augmentation might be detrimental to obtaining the expected outcomes. PDRN appears not to have a positive effect on the soft-tissue volume gain.

Digital planning and bone regenerative technologies: A narrative review.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this narrative review was to explore the application of digital technologies (DT) for the simplification and improvement of bone augmentation procedures in advanced implant dentistry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search on electronic databases was performed to identify systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, prospective/retrospective case series, and case reports related to the application of DT in advanced implant dentistry. RESULTS: Seventy-nine articles were included. Potential fields of application of DT are the following: 1) the use of intra-oral scanners for the definition of soft tissue profile and the residual dentition; 2) the use of dental lab CAD (computer-aided design) software to create a digital wax-up replicating the ideal ridge and tooth morphology; 3) the matching of STL (Standard Triangulation Language) files with DICOM (DIgital COmmunication in Medicine) files from CBCTs with a dedicated software; 4) the production of stereolithographic 3D models reproducing the jaws and the bone defects; 5) the creation of surgical templates to guide implant placement and augmentation procedures; 6) the production of customized meshes for bone regeneration; and 7) the use of static or dynamic computer-aided implant placement. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this narrative review seem to demonstrate that the use of a partially or fully digital workflow can be successfully used also in advanced implant dentistry. However, the number of studies (in particular RCTs) focused on the use of a fully digital workflow in advanced implant dentistry is still limited and more studies are needed to properly evaluate the potentials of DT.

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft compared with composite grafts: A one-year single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the one year implant treatment outcome and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) following maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with autogenous bone graft (ABG) from the zygomatic buttress (control) compared with 1:1 mixture of ABG and anorganic porcine bone mineral (APBM) (Test I) or biphasic bone graft material (BBGM) (Test II). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty healthy patients (34 females, 26 males) were randomly allocated to either control or test groups. Outcome measures included survival of suprastructures and implants, implant stability quotient, health status of peri-implant tissue, peri-implant marginal bone loss, frequency of complications, and PROMs using Oral Health Impact Profile-14 combined with questionnaire assessing patient perception of peri-implant soft tissue, prosthetic solution, implant function, and implant treatment outcome using visual analogue scale. Mean differences were expressed with standard deviation and 95% confidence interval. Level of significance was .05. RESULTS: All suprastructures and implants were well-functioning after one year of functional implant loading. There was no significant difference between control and test groups in any of the applied outcome measures. The implant stability significantly increased from implant placement to abutment connection within all groups (p < .001). High patient satisfaction and significant improvement in oral health-related quality of life was also reported within all groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that MSFA with composite grafts containing minimal amounts of ABG reveals comparable implant treatment outcomes as compared with ABG alone, after one year of functional implant loading. Extensive ABG harvesting in conjunction with MSFA therefore seems not to be needed.

Application of sticky bone combined with concentrated growth factor (CGF) for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation of anterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to estimate the effect of sticky bone combined with concentrated growth factor (CGF) on anterior alveolar horizontal augmentation during implantation. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to either the test group (Group 1, n = 14) or the control group (Group 2, n = 14). Patients in Group 1 and Group 2 underwent GBR using sticky bone combined with CGF and bone powders mixed with saline, respectively. On postoperative Day 7, the patients completed the visual analogue scale (VAS). Three-dimensional models of maxillary alveolar bone were reconstructed from CBCT data at different periods, and the bone volume conversion rate was calculated with the assistance of a measurement marker guide. Labial bone thickness before and after trauma closure and bone density at six months postoperatively were also measured. RESULTS: The mean bone volume conversion rate for Group 1 (72.09 ± 12.18%) was greater than that for Group 2 (57.47 ± 9.62%, P = 0.002). The VAS score was lower for Group 1 than for Group 2 (P = 0.032). At six months postoperatively, greater bone density was found in patients in Group 1 than in those in Group 2, although the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The change in the thickness of the labial bone graft material in Group 1 was smaller than that in Group 2 (P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Sticky bone combined with CGF was able to achieve better bone augmentation than conventional GBR. With excellent mechanical properties and the capacity to release growth factors, sticky bone is an ideal material for bone grafting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 10/04/2022 (Identification number: ChiCTR2200058500).

Learn, unlearn, and relearn post-extraction alveolar socket healing: Evolving knowledge and practices.

OBJECTIVE: This review was to offer a comprehensive analysis of currently available evidence on post-extraction alveolar socket healing, including i) the histological and molecular events during alveolar socket healing, ii) the dimensional ridge alterations after socket healing and controversies relating to sinus pneumatisation, iii) the patient-specific factors, procedural elements, and site-related variables influencing socket healing, iv) techniques and effectiveness of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedure, and v) the philosophies and cost-effectiveness of ARP in clinical practice. SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: To investigate the dimensional profiles of the alveolar ridge following unassisted healing, an overview of systematic reviews was conducted in February 2024 by two independent reviewers. Four electronic databases were searched in Pubmed, Embase, Web of science and Cochrane Library between 2004 and 2024 to identify all relevant systematic reviews on post-extraction healing. A further manual search of reviews was also conducted. The articles were further reviewed in full text for relevance. The AMSTAR-2 appraisal tool was adopted to assess methodological quality. Current research pertaining to other listed objectives was objectively analysed in narration. DATA: 11 out of 459 retrieved studies were selected and ultimately covered in this review on the dimensional changes of alveolar ridge following natural healing: Seven systematic reviews and four systematic reviews with meta-analyses. The methodological quality of all included reviews was critically low. CONCLUSION: This review thoroughly examines the healing profiles of post-extraction alveolar sockets and highlights the dynamic process with overlapping phases and the inter-individual variability in outcomes. ARP procedure is a potential strategy for facilitating prosthetic site development, while the current evidence is limited. Herein, an individualised and prosthetically driven approach is crucial. Further well sized and designed trials with novel biomaterials need to be undertaken, and the role of artificial intelligence in predicting healing and assisting clinical decision-making could be explored. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: By advancing our understanding of alveolar socket healing and its management strategies, clinicians can make more informed decisions regarding patient and site level assessment and selection, surgical techniques, and biomaterial choices, ultimately contributing to the enhanced healing process with reduced complications and improved quality of life for patients undergoing tooth extraction and dental implant treatments.

Horizontal ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration with an association of particulate allografts mixed with platelet-rich fibrin, collagen membrane and tent-screws: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) is a versatile technique employed not only to correct pre-implant alveolar bone defects but also to facilitate bone defect correction during simultaneous implant placement. The effectiveness of GBR varies significantly among different protocols, as reported in the literature. This study specifically aimed to radiologically evaluate the horizontal bone gain obtained using a GBR procedure combining a particulate allograft, platelet-rich fibrin, resorbable collagen membrane, and screw tents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 patients with an insufficient alveolar bone width for dental implant placement were treated with a GBR technique using a mixture of particulate allograft (demineralised freeze-dried bone allograft 300-500 and 500-1000 µm), advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF), resorbable collagen membranes and screws tents (1.2 mm in diameter). Over the course of the study, a total of 63 GBR procedures were performed on these patients. Bone gains were measured by cone-beam computed tomography at 9.1 ± 2.0 months post-operative. RESULTS: A significant mean increase (P < 0.001) of 3.2 ± 0.9 mm at the sites of the greatest bone defect was observed. This improvement was consistent across various locations, including both maxillary and mandibular regions, and in cases of terminal and embedded edentulism, without any post-operative complications during the entire post-operative follow-up. All patients benefited from implant placement following the bone augmentation protocol. CONCLUSION: GBR combining particulate allografts, A-PRF, collagen membranes, and screw tents achieves reliable, predictable, and reproducible clinical gains that allow for future implant placement.

Time management in multistep periodontal and implant treatments: a practical guide.

In addition to the proper selection of techniques, appropriate treatment sequencing and prioritization are prerequisites for successful periodontal and implant procedures. The aim of this study was to provide evidence-based time frames for various procedures pertaining to periodontal and implant treatment. A literature review was conducted to collect data on tissue healing; in areas in which data were lacking, the viewpoints of experienced clinicians were solicited to establish a consensus. This review reports recommended time frames for the healing processes associated with surgical crown-lengthening procedures (both functional and esthetic), fresh socket management, alveolar ridge management, soft tissue management, sinus floor augmentation, implant loading, and peri-implant defect management.

The nasal spine suture: A novel approach for membrane stabilization.

BACKGROUND: Current evidence acknowledges guided bone regeneration (GBR) as a predictable therapeutic modality in the augmentation of a deficient alveolar ridge. Such deficiencies often reveal inadequate bone volume to support implant placement in a position amenable to prosthetic reconstruction. Additionally, an evolving body of literature demonstrates that membrane fixation may lead to improved clinical bone gain through positively influencing blood clot formation, stability, and the eventual osteogenic potential of the defect. Alternative benefits to membrane fixation, such as reduced graft displacement and reduction in wound micromotion, have also been cited as mechanisms for an increased regenerative response. METHODS AND RESULTS: The aim of this report was to present a case, including diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for the reconstruction of a horizontal ridge deficiency. The patient's deficiency in ridge volume was found to be a developmental sequelae of lateral incisor agenesis, resulting in an underdeveloped midfacial region of the alveolar process subjacent to sites #7 and #10. The fixation protocol outlined in this report demonstrated adequate horizontal ridge augmentation to facilitate future prosthetic reconstruction with the use of implants. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous protocols have been established in an attempt to achieve effective barrier membrane stabilization for bone augmentation procedures. However, some techniques are poorly suited for the anatomically challenging region of the anterior maxilla. A case report describing the utilization of the anterior nasal spine for anchorage of a membrane-stabilizing suture may present a novel, safe, and effective technique for stabilizing the intended region of augmentation, as well as preventing graft migration beyond the membrane-maxilla interface. Key points Regarding guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures, micromotion of the membrane or of the underlying particulate graft may negatively influence the volume of the augmented site. The ability to adequately stabilize the graft-membrane interface is recognized as a necessary prerequisite to predictably achieve optimal surgical outcomes. To the authors' knowledge, there is no clinical or scientific evidence regarding the use of the anterior nasal spine for membrane anchorage in maxillary GBR procedures, and thus a novel approach to membrane stabilization is introduced.