Lidocaína al 1% para analgesia posoperatoria en la reparación de hernia inguinal / Lidocaine 1% for postoperative analgesia in the repair of inguinal hernia

The use of two intravenous lidocaine infusion rates (2 and 3 mg/kg/h) is presented, seeking an effective dose for postoperative analgesia in schoolchildren operated on for unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, comparative, randomized, double-blind study. Which included 32 school children scheduled for ASA I-II unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia repair surgery. They were divided into 2 groups randomly, group 1 received 1% lidocaine 2 mg/kg/h and group 2 1% lidocaine 3 mg/kg/h. RESULTS: Both groups had a higher percentage of patients who reported a score < 3 according to ENS scales; The patients belonging to group 2 reported a lower percentage of patients who required additional analgesia with diclofenac and similar requirements for tramadol, with similar mean times for the first rescue dose; adverse effects were presented in a higher percentage in group 2 in 18.7%, with agitation being the most frequent adverse effect. CONCLUSION: Follow-up of patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia repair who received the lidocaine infusion analgesia protocol shows adequate and effective pain control in the immediate postoperative period, with minimal adverse effects in addition to reducing the consumption of analgesics. rescue.

Se presenta el uso de dos tasas de infusión de lidocaína endovenosa (2 y 3 mg/kg/h), buscando una dosis eficaz para analgesia posoperatoria en escolares intervenidos de hernia inguinal uni o bilateral. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo, comparativo, aleatorizado, doble ciego. Que incluyó a 32 escolares programados a cirugía de reparación de hernia inguinal unilateral o bilateral ASA I-II. Se dividieron en 2 grupos de forma aleatorizada, el grupo 1 recibió lidocaína 1% 2 mg/kg/h y el grupo 2 lidocaína al 1% 3 mg/kg/h. RESULTADOS: Ambos grupos tuvieron mayor porcentaje de pacientes que refirieron puntuación < 3 según escalas ENS; los pacientes pertenecientes al grupo 2 reportaron menor porcentaje de pacientes que requirieron analgesia adicional con diclofenac y requerimientos similares para tramadol, con tiempos promedios similares para primera dosis de rescate, los efectos adversos se presentaron en mayor porcentaje en el grupo 2 en 18,7%, siendo la agitación el efecto adverso más frecuente. CONCLUSIÓN: El seguimiento a los pacientes sometidos a reparación de hernia inguinal uni o bilateral que recibieron el protocolo de analgesia de infusión de lidocaína muestra un control adecuado y eficaz del dolor en el posoperatorio inmediato, con mínimos efectos adversos además de reducir el consumo de analgesicos de rescate.

Analgesia posoperatoria en la videolaparascopía de urgencia mediante irrigación de bupivacaína intraperitoneal / Posoperative analgesia in emergency videolaparoscopy through intraperitoneal bupivacaine irrigation

Introducción: La videolaparascopía es un procedimiento frecuente en los servicios de urgencias de cirugía general. El dolor agudo después de estas intervenciones es de naturaleza compleja y requiere un tratamiento analgésico efectivo. Objetivo: Determinar la utilidad del empleo de bupivacaína intraperitoneal en el alivio del dolor posoperatorio en la videolaparascopía de urgencia. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio longitudinal prospectivo y analítico en 80 pacientes mayores de 18 años, anunciados para videolaparoscopía bajo anestesia general orotraqueal en el servicio de urgencias del HMC: Dr. Luis Díaz Soto, desde septiembre de 2016 hasta septiembre de 2018. Los pacientes fueron divididos aleatoriamente en dos grupos de 40 cada uno. Al grupo 1 se aplicó lidocaína transdérmica preincisional en las incisiones de piel y, al término de la cirugía, se irrigaron ambos hemidiafragmas con bupivacaína al 0,25 por ciento. Al grupo 2 se le administró dosis preincisional de analgésicos endovenosos solamente. Resultados: Predominó significativamente el sexo femenino sin diferencia entre grupos. La analgesia posoperatoria fue mejor en el grupo 1 estadísticamente significativa a las 4, 8 y 12 horas. Los requerimientos de analgesia de rescate fueron menores en el grupo 1 (p=0,0024). No se reportaron efectos adversos. Conclusiones: La administración de lidocaína transdérmica preincisional y la instilación de bupivacaína intraperitoneal al final de la videolaparoscopía de urgencia, reduce significativamente el dolor en las primeras horas de posoperatorio. Su aplicación es sencilla, fácil y segura sin evidencias de efectos adversos(AU)

Introduction: Videolaparoscopy is a frequent general surgery procedure in emergency services. Acute pain after these interventions is complex in nature and requires effective analgesic treatment. Objective: To determine the usefulness of intraperitoneal bupivacaine in the relief of postoperative pain in emergency videolaparoscopy. Methods: A prospective, analytical and longitudinal study was carried out in eighty patients older than eighteen years old, announced for videolaparoscopy under orotracheal general anesthesia in the emergency department of Hospital Militar Central Dr. Luis Díaz Soto, from September 2016 to September 2018. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of forty individuals each. Group 1 was applied pre-incisional transdermal lidocaine on skin incisions and, at the end of surgery, both hemidiaphragms were irrigated with bupivacaine 0.25 percent. Group 2 received pre-incisional doses of intravenous analgesics only. Results: The female sex predominated significantly, without difference between the two groups. Postoperative analgesia was better in group 1, insofar it was statistically significant at four, eight and twelve hours. Rescue analgesia requirements were lower in group 1 (p=0.0024). No adverse effects were reported. Conclusions: The administration of pre-incisional transdermal lidocaine and the instillation of intraperitoneal bupivacaine at the end of emergency videolaparoscopy significantly reduces pain during the first hours after surgery. Its application is simple, easy and safe, without evidence of adverse effects(AU)

Analgesia multimodal una alternativa para el paciente quirúrgico / Multimodal analgesia: an alternative for the surgical patient

Introducción: El dolor posterior a una intervención quirúrgica, es un síntoma frecuentemente observado, no cumple una función útil y el peligro de no tratarlo aumenta la morbilidad y mortalidad posoperatoria. Objetivo: Destacar la importancia de la analgesia multimodal en el control del dolor agudo posoperatorio. Métodos: Revisión en la literatura impresa tanto nacional como internacional, sobre la analgesia y la modalidad multimodal y además, se hizo búsqueda en Internet. En los artículos revisados se obtuvieron distintos aspectos clínicos de la analgesia multimodal y de sus protocolos. Resultados: En la actualidad para mitigar el dolor y alcanzar la máxima expresión en la analgesia posoperatoria se han desarrollado diferentes modalidades analgésicas, aunque de todas ellas solo ha alcanzado mayor grado de recomendación, la analgesia multimodal porque es capaz de conseguir con su efecto sinérgico y con pequeñas dosis, una mejor potencia para producir analgesia y menos efectos adversos. Consideraciones finales: La analgesia multimodal logra un control adecuado del dolor agudo posoperatorio, disminuye las complicaciones posoperatorias y la necesidad de analgesia de rescate, pero todo esto depende del protocolo de analgesia multimodal propuesto, la vía de administración de los fármacos elegidos, sus dosis y el cumplimiento de los intervalos de aplicación(AU)

Introduction: The pain after surgery is a frequently observed symptom, it is not a useful function and the danger of not treating it increases postoperative morbidity and mortality. Objective: To highlight the importance of multimodal analgesia in the control of acute postoperative pain. Methods: It was made a review in the printed literature both national and international on the multimodal analgesia, and in addition, a search in Internet. In the reviewed articles there were obtained different clinical aspects of multimodal analgesia and its protocolization. Results: Nowadays, in order to mitigate the pain and achieve the maximum expression in the postoperative analgesia, there have been developed different analgesic modalities, although of all of them it only has achieved a greater degree of recommendation, the multimodal analgesia because it is capable of achieving with its synergetic effect and with small doses, a better power to produce analgesia and fewer adverse effects. Conclusions: The multimodal analgesia achieved adequate control of acute postoperative pain, decreasing the inherent complications of this state and the need of rescue analgesia. All of the above depends on the proposed protocol of multimodal analgesia, the route of administration of the chosen drugs, their doses and the compliance of the application intervals(AU)

Do we still need central blocks while we have erector spinae plane block? Case of 2. 5 month old infant / Ainda precisamos de bloqueios centrais enquanto temos o bloqueio do eretor da espinha? Caso de criança de 2, 5 meses de idade

Abstract Erector spinae plane block is gaining popularity both for its ease of application and as its comparable effect on postoperative analgesia with central regional techniques like paravertebral block or epidural anesthesia. Its use for many indications has been reported in the literature for pediatric patients. We would like to share our experiences in a 2.5-month infant scheduled for thoracotomy for a giant congenital cyst. Single shot erector spinae plane block was done at T4 level before the start of the surgery for both surgical and postoperative analgesia. No complication was seen during both surgery and follow up period. Erector spinae plane block with the combination of paracetamol was adequate for pain relief.

Resumo O bloqueio do plano do músculo eretor da espinha tem ganhado popularidade, tanto pela facilidade de aplicação quanto pelo efeito comparável em analgesia pós-operatória com técnicas regionais centrais, como o bloqueio paravertebral ou a anestesia peridural. Seu uso tem sido relatado na literatura para muitas indicações em pacientes pediátricos. Gostaríamos de compartilhar nossas experiências no caso de um bebê de 2,5 meses de idade programado para toracotomia para excisão de um cisto congênito gigante. O bloqueio do plano do eretor da espinha dorsal com injeção única foi realizado no nível de T4 antes do início da cirurgia para analgesia cirúrgica e pós-operatória. Nenhuma complicação foi observada durante a cirurgia e o período de acompanhamento. O bloqueio do plano do eretor da espinha com a combinação de paracetamol foi adequado para o alívio da dor.

[Do we still need central blocks while we have erector spinae plane block? Case of 2.5 month old infant]. / Ainda precisamos de bloqueios centrais enquanto temos o bloqueio do eretor da espinha? Caso de crianc¸a de 2,5 meses de idade.

Erector spinae plane block is gaining popularity both for its ease of application and as its comparable effect on postoperative analgesia with central regional techniques like paravertebral block or epidural anesthesia. Its use for many indications has been reported in the literature for pediatric patients. We would like to share our experiences in a 2.5-month infant scheduled for thoracotomy for a giant congenital cyst. Single shot erector spinae plane block was done at T4 level before the start of the surgery for both surgical and postoperative analgesia. No complication was seen during both surgery and follow up period. Erector spinae plane block with the combination of paracetamol was adequate for pain relief.

Comparison of adductor canal block for analgesia in arthroscopic surgery with ropivacaine alone and ropivacaine and clonidine / Comparação do bloqueio do canal adutor para analgesia em cirurgia artroscópica com ropivacaína isolada e ropivacaína + clonidina

Abstract Background and objectives: Inadequate pain relief after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction affects mobility leading to development of adhesions, weakened ligament insertion and muscle atrophy. Adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia preserves quadriceps strength. The present study was conducted to compare pain free period in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, receiving ultrasound-guided adductor canal block with ropivacaine alone and ropivacaine with clonidine. Methods: A prospective randomized double blinded study was conducted including sixty-three adult, ASA class I, II patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. They were randomized into three groups: Group S - control group received adductor canal block with 30 mL saline, Group R - ropivacaine group received adductor canal block with 30 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and Group RC - clonidine group received adductor canal block with 30 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine with clonidine 1 µg.kg-1. The primary aim was to compare the pain free period in patients receiving adductor canal block with ropivacaine alone or ropivacine with clonidine. The secondary outcomes were pain score at rest and movement, total analgesic requirement, sedation score and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: The mean pain free periods were 20 min, 384.76 min and 558.09 min for Group S, Group R and Group RC, respectively and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between Group R and Group RC in terms of pain scores at rest and movement and total analgesic requirement. Conclusion: Addition of clonidine to ropivacaine in USG guided adductor canal block led to significant prolongation of pain free period though pain score at rest and movement, and rescue analgesic requirement, did not differ.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: O alívio inadequado da dor após a reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior afeta a mobilidade, leva ao desenvolvimento de aderências, inserção do ligamento enfraquecido e atrofia muscular. O bloqueio do canal adutor para analgesia pós-operatória preserva a força do quadríceps. O presente estudo foi feito para comparar o período sem dor em pacientes de reconstrução artroscópica do ligamento cruzado anterior, submetidos ao bloqueio do canal adutor guiado por ultrassom com ropivacaína isolada e ropivacaína + clonidina. Métodos: Um estudo prospectivo, randômico e duplo-cego foi conduzido com 63 pacientes adultos, estado físico ASA I-II, submetidos à reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior. Os pacientes foram randomizados em três grupos: Grupo S, que recebeu bloqueio do canal adutor com 30 mL de solução salina para controle; Grupo R, que recebeu bloqueio do canal adutor com 30 mL de ropivacaína a 0,375%; Grupo RC, que recebeu bloqueio do canal adutor com 30 mL de ropivacaína a 0,375% e 1 µg.kg-1 de clonidina. O desfecho primário do estudo foi comparar o período sem dor nos pacientes que receberam bloqueio do canal adutor com ropivacaína isolada ou ropivacina + clonidina. Os desfechos secundários foram escores de dor em repouso e movimento, necessidade total de analgésicos, escore de sedação, além de náusea e vômito no pós-operatório. Resultados: Os períodos médios sem dor foram 20 min, 384,76 min e 558,09 min para os grupos S, R e RC, respectivamente, e essa diferença foi estatisticamente significativa (p < 0,001). Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos R e RC em termos de escores de dor em repouso e movimento e a necessidade total de analgésicos. Conclusão: A adição de clonidina à ropivacaína em bloqueio do canal adutor guiado por ultrassom levou a um prolongamento significativo do período sem dor, embora os escores de dor em repouso e movimento, e a necessidade de analgésico de resgate, não tenham diferido.

[Comparison of adductor canal block for analgesia in arthroscopic surgery with ropivacaine alone and ropivacaine and clonidine]. / Comparação do bloqueio do canal adutor para analgesia em cirurgia artroscópica com ropivacaína isolada e ropivacaína + clonidina.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Inadequate pain relief after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction affects mobility leading to development of adhesions, weakened ligament insertion and muscle atrophy. Adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia preserves quadriceps strength. The present study was conducted to compare pain free period in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, receiving ultrasound-guided adductor canal block with ropivacaine alone and ropivacaine with clonidine. METHODS: A prospective randomized double blinded study was conducted including sixty-three adult, ASA class I, II patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. They were randomized into three groups: Group S - control group received adductor canal block with 30mL saline, Group R - ropivacaine group received adductor canal block with 30mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and Group RC - clonidine group received adductor canal block with 30mL of 0.375% ropivacaine with clonidine 1µg.kg-1. The primary aim was to compare the pain free period in patients receiving adductor canal block with ropivacaine alone or ropivacine with clonidine. The secondary outcomes were pain score at rest and movement, total analgesic requirement, sedation score and postoperative nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: The mean pain free periods were 20min, 384.76min and 558.09min for Group S, Group R and Group RC, respectively and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between Group R and Group RC in terms of pain scores at rest and movement and total analgesic requirement. CONCLUSION: Addition of clonidine to ropivacaine in USG guided adductor canal block led to significant prolongation of pain free period though pain score at rest and movement, and rescue analgesic requirement, did not differ.

Continuous quadratus lumborum type 3 block provides effective postoperative analgesia for hip surgery: case report / O bloqueio contínuo do quadrado lombar tipo 3 fornece analgesia pós-operatória efetiva para cirurgia do quadril: relato de caso

Abstract Introduction: Hip surgery is a major surgery that causes severe postoperative pain. Although pain during rest is usually considerably reduced mobilization is important in terms of thromboembolic complications. The quadratus lumborum block is a regional analgesic technique that blocks T6-L3 nerve branches. This block may provide adequate analgesia and reduce opioid consumption after hip surgery. Case report: We performed continuous quadratus lumborum type 3 block in two patients who underwent hip arthroplasty. Postoperative 24-h pain scores, local anesthetic consumptions on patient-controlled analgesia and additional analgesic requirement were recorded. In two patients, postoperative pain scores were less than 6 during rest and physiotherapy. Patient was mobilized in the early postoperative period without additional opioid analgesic requirement and without muscle weakness. Discussion: Continuous quadratus lumborum block may be used to relieve postoperative acute pain in hip surgery because it provides one-sided anesthesia without muscle weakness.

Resumo Introdução: A cirurgia de quadril é uma cirurgia de grande porte que causa dor intensa no pós-operatório. Embora a dor durante o repouso seja consideravelmente reduzida, a mobilização é importante em termos de complicações tromboembólicas. O bloqueio doquadrado lombar é uma técnica analgésica regional que bloqueia os ramos nervosos de T6-L3. Esse bloqueio pode fornecer analgesia adequada e reduzir o consumo de opioides após cirurgiasde quadril. Relato de caso: Realizamos o bloqueio contínuo do quadrado lombar tipo 3 em dois pacientes submetidos à artroplastia de quadril. Durante as 24 hs de pós-operatório foram registrados os escores de dor, o consumo de anestésicos locais em analgesia controlada pelo paciente e a necessidade de analgésicos adicionais. Em dois pacientes, os escores de dor pós-operatória foram < 6 durante o repouso e fisioterapia. O paciente foi mobilizado no período pós-operatório imediato, sem precisar de analgésico opioide adicional e sem fraqueza muscular. Discussão: O bloqueio contínuo do quadrado lombar pode ser usado para aliviar a dor aguda no pós-operatório de cirurgia de quadril porque fornece anestesia unilateral sem fraqueza muscular.

Continuous erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia of multiple rib fracture surgery: case report / Bloqueio do plano do eretor da espinha para analgesia pós-operatória de cirurgia de fratura de múltiplas costelas: relato de caso

Abstract Introduction: The erector spinae plane block is a newly described and effective interfascial plane block for thoracic and abdominal surgery. This case report describes a patient with multiple rib fractures undergoing ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block for analgesia. Case report: A 37-year-old male patient was taken for surgical fixation of multiple rib fractures. At the end of the surgery, using ultrasound-guided longitudinal parasagittal orientation 3 cm to the lateral aspect of the T5 spinous process and an in-plane technique, 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine was administered between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process, and a catheter was then inserted in the same plane. Before the end of surgery, 1 g paracetamol and 50 mg dexketoprofen were administered. Postoperative analgesia was applied with patient controlled analgesia method using 0.25% bupivacaine via the catheter. The patient's Visual Analogue Scale score at rest in the first 24 h was 0. The patient was monitored for 3 days with Visual Analogue Scale < 4, and the catheter was removed on postoperative day 4. No opioid requirement other than paracetamol and dexketoprofen occurred during this time. No postoperative complications were recorded. Discussion: The erector spinae plane block is an alternative to paravertebral, intercostal, epidural or other regional techniques. It may be a suitable technique in anesthesia and algology practice due to providing analgesia in the postoperative period with a catheter in the erector spinae plane.

Resumo Introdução: O bloqueio do plano do eretor da espinha é um bloqueio do plano interfacial recentemente descrito e eficaz para cirurgia torácica e abdominal. Neste relato descrevemos o caso de um paciente com fratura de múltiplas costelas, submetido ao bloqueio contínuo do plano do eretor da espinha guiado por ultrassom para analgesia. Relato de caso: Paciente do sexo masculino, 37 anos, encaminhado para fixação cirúrgica de fratura de múltiplas costelas. Ao final da cirurgia, usando a orientação parassagital longitudinal guiada por ultrassom 3 cm em relação à face lateral do processo espinhoso T5 e a técnica no plano, 20 ml de bupivacaína a 0,25% foram administrados entre o músculo eretor da espinha e o processo transverso, e um cateter foi então inserido no mesmo plano. Antes do final da cirurgia, 1 g de paracetamol e 50 mg de dexcetoprofeno foram administrados. A analgesia pós-operatória foi aplicada com o método de analgesia controlada pelo paciente, com bupivacaína a 0,25% via cateter. Na Escala Visual Analógica, o escore do paciente em repouso nas primeiras 24 h foi zero. O paciente foi monitorado por três dias com a Escala Visual Analógica < 4, e o cateter foi removido no quarto dia de pós-operatório. Exceto por paracetamol e dexcetoprofeno, não houve necessidade de outro agente opioide durante esse tempo. Não houve registro de complicação pós-operatória. Discussão: O bloqueio do plano do eretor da espinha é uma alternativa às técnicas paravertebrais, intercostais, epidurais ou outras técnicas regionais. Pode ser uma técnica adequada na prática de anestesia e algologia devido ao fornecimento de analgesia no período pós-operatório mediante um cateter no plano do eretor da espinha.

[Continuous quadratus lumborum type 3 block provides effective postoperative analgesia for hip surgery: case report]. / O bloqueio contínuo do quadrado lombar tipo 3 fornece analgesia pós­operatória efetiva para cirurgia do quadril: relato de caso.

INTRODUCTION: Hip surgery is a major surgery that causes severe postoperative pain. Although pain during rest is usually considerably reduced mobilization is important in terms of thromboembolic complications. The quadratus lumborum block is a regional analgesic technique that blocks T6-L3 nerve branches. This block may provide adequate analgesia and reduce opioid consumption after hip surgery. CASE REPORT: We performed continuous quadratus lumborum type 3 block in two patients who underwent hip arthroplasty. Postoperative 24-h pain scores, local anesthetic consumptions on patient-controlled analgesia and additional analgesic requirement were recorded. In two patients, postoperative pain scores were less than 6 during rest and physiotherapy. Patient was mobilized in the early postoperative period without additional opioid analgesic requirement and without muscle weakness. DISCUSSION: Continuous quadratus lumborum block may be used to relieve postoperative acute pain in hip surgery because it provides one-sided anesthesia without muscle weakness.

[Continuous erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia of multiple rib fracture surgery: case report]. / Bloqueio do plano do eretor da espinha para analgesia pós­operatória de cirurgia de fratura de múltiplas costelas: relato de caso.

INTRODUCTION: The erector spinae plane block is a newly described and effective interfascial plane block for thoracic and abdominal surgery. This case report describes a patient with multiple rib fractures undergoing ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block for analgesia. CASE REPORT: A 37-year-old male patient was taken for surgical fixation of multiple rib fractures. At the end of the surgery, using ultrasound-guided longitudinal parasagittal orientation 3cm to the lateral aspect of the T5 spinous process and an in-plane technique, 20mL 0.25% bupivacaine was administered between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process, and a catheter was then inserted in the same plane. Before the end of surgery, 1g paracetamol and 50mg dexketoprofen were administered. Postoperative analgesia was applied with patient controlled analgesia method using 0.25% bupivacaine via the catheter. The patient's Visual Analogue Scale score at rest in the first 24h was 0. The patient was monitored for 3 days with Visual Analogue Scale<4, and the catheter was removed on postoperative day 4. No opioid requirement other than paracetamol and dexketoprofen occurred during this time. No postoperative complications were recorded. DISCUSSION: The erector spinae plane block is an alternative to paravertebral, intercostal, epidural or other regional techniques. It may be a suitable technique in anesthesia and algology practice due to providing analgesia in the postoperative period with a catheter in the erector spinae plane.

Continuous quadratus lumborum type II block in partial nephrectomy / Bloqueio do quadrado lombar tipo II contínuo para analgesia pós-operatória de nefrectomia parcial

Abstract Background and objectives: Quadratus lumborum block was first described in 2007 and currently there are descriptions of its achievement through four different injection points. This blockage provides abdominal wall and visceral analgesia, and one of its mechanisms is the dispersion of the local anesthetic into the paravertebral space. We describe the performance of a continuous quadratus lumborum type II block for postoperative analgesia in a partial nephrectomy. Case report: A 64-year-old woman, scheduled for partial left laparoscopic nephrectomy. During the procedure, due to technical difficulties, an incision was made in the left flank to facilitate the surgical approach. In the early postoperative period, a continuous quadratus lumborum type II block was performed using ultrasonography as part of the multimodal analgesic strategy. Initially, 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered and 3 cm of catheter were introduced into the interfascial space. Subsequently, a continuous infusion of 5.2 mL.h−1 of 0.2% ropivacaine was given for 48 hours. In the first 24 postoperative hours, the patient reported no pain at rest or on movement. In the following 24 h, she was free of pain at rest and only a slight pain (2/10) on movement. Conclusions: Continuous quadratus lumborum type II block was an effective postoperative analgesic option. Blocking of somatic nerves and visceral afferent pathways provided abdominal and visceral wall analgesia, allowing the reduction of opioid consumption. We consider relevant to explore the analgesic capacity of the quadratus lumborum block and its different approaches, as well as the possibility of it becoming an alternative in patients scheduled for kidney surgery.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: O bloqueio do quadrado lombar foi descrito pela primeira vez em 2007 e atualmente existem descrições da sua realização através de quatro pontos de injeção. Esse bloqueio promove analgesia da parede abdominal e analgesia visceral e um de seus mecanismos é a dispersão do anestésico local para o espaço paravertebral. Descrevemos a realização do bloqueio do quadrado lombar tipo II contínuo para analgesia pós-operatória numa nefrectomia parcial. Relato de caso: Mulher de 64 anos, agendada para nefrectomia parcial à esquerda por via laparoscópica. Durante o procedimento, por dificuldades técnicas, foi feita uma incisão no flanco esquerdo para facilitar a abordagem cirúrgica. No pós-operatório imediato, fez-se o bloqueio do quadrado lombar tipo II contínuo, recorrendo-se a ultrassonografia, como parte da estratégia analgésica multimodal. Inicialmente foram administrados 20 ml de ropivacaína 0,2% e introduzidos 3 cm de cateter no espaço interfascial. Posteriormente, colocou-se uma perfusão contínua de 5,2 mL.h−1 de ropivacaína 0,2% durante 48 horas. Nas primeiras 24 horas de pós-operatório, a paciente não referiu dor em repouso ou com movimento. Nas 24 horas seguintes, manteve-se sem dor em repouso e apenas com dor ligeira (2/10) com o movimento. Conclusões: A realização do bloqueio quadrado lombar tipo II contínuo foi uma opção analgésica pós-operatória eficaz. O bloqueio de nervos somáticos e das vias aferentes viscerais promoveu analgesia da parede abdominal e visceral, permitiu reduzir o consumo de opioides. Consideramos relevante explorar a capacidade analgésica do bloqueio do quadrado lombar e suas diferentes abordagens, bem como a possibilidade de se tornar uma opção em doentes propostos para cirurgia renal.

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of efficacy of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine on postoperative pain control / Bloqueio do plano abdominal transverso guiado por ultrassom em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica: comparação da eficácia de bupivacaína e levobupivacaína no controle da dor pós-operatória

Abstract Background and objective The use of transversus abdominis plane block with different local anesthetics is considered as a part of multimodal analgesia regimen in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. However no studies have been published comparing bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for transversus abdominis plane block. We aimed to compare bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Fifty patients (ASA I/II), undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two groups. Following anesthesia induction, ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block was performed with 30 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% in Group B (n = 25) and 30 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% in Group L (n = 25) for each side. The level of pain was evaluated using 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during coughing 1, 5, 15, 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h after the operation. When visual analogue scale > 3, the patients received IV tenoxicam 20 mg. If visual analogue scale remained >3, they received IV. tramadol 1 mg.kg−1. In case of inadequate analgesia, a rescue analgesic was given. The analgesic requirement, time to first analgesic requirement was recorded. Results Visual analogue scale levels showed no difference except first and fifth minutes postoperatively where VAS was higher in Group L (p < 0.05). Analgesic requirement was similar in both groups. Time to first analgesic requirement was shorter in Group L (4.35 ± 6.92 min vs. 34.91 ± 86.26 min, p = 0.013). Conclusions Bupivacaine and levobupivacaine showed similar efficacy at TAP block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivo O uso do bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal com diferentes anestésicos locais é considerado como parte do regime de analgesia multimodal em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica. No entanto, nenhum estudo comparando bupivacaína e levobupivacaína para bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal foi publicado. Nosso objetivo foi comparar bupivacaína e levobupivacaína em bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal guiado por ultrassom em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica. Métodos Cinquenta pacientes (ASA I/II), submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica foram alocados aleatoriamente em dois grupos. Após a indução da anestesia, o bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal bilateral guiado por ultrassom foi realizado com 30 mL de bupivacaína a 0,25% no Grupo B (n = 25) e 30 mL de levobupivacaína a 0,25% no Grupo L (n = 25) para cada lado. O nível de dor foi avaliado usando a escala visual analógica de 10 cm em repouso e durante a tosse em 1, 5, 15, 30 minutos e em 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 e 24 horas após a operação. Quando a escala visual analógica > 3, os pacientes receberam 10 mg de tenoxicam por via intravenosa (IV). Se a escala visual analógica permanecesse > 3, os pacientes recebiam tramadol IV (1 mg.kg−1). Em caso de analgesia inadequada, um analgésico de resgate foi administrado. A necessidade de analgésico e o tempo até a primeira solicitação de analgésico foram registrados. Resultados Os escores da escala visual analógica não mostraram diferença, exceto no primeiro e quinto minutos de pós-operatório, onde a escala visual analógica foi maior no Grupo L (p < 0,05). A necessidade de analgésico foi semelhante em ambos os grupos. O tempo até a primeira solicitação de analgésico foi menor no Grupo L (4,35 ± 6,92 min vs. 34,91 ± 86,26 min, p = 0,013). Conclusões Bupivacaína e levobupivacaína apresentaram eficácia similar no bloqueio TAP em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica.

El dolor agudo posoperatorio, aún un problema en el paciente quirúrgico / Acute postoperative pain

Introducción: el dolor ha sido durante mucho tiempo subvalorado y manejado inadecuadamente de manera frecuente, tanto en niños como en adultos. Lamentablemente, en nuestro medio carecemos de esquemas que garanticen en su totalidad el alivio del dolor, pues, ni el dolor agudo, ni el crónico suelen recibir un tratamiento adecuado por muy diversas razones. Objetivo: destacar la importancia de la planificación de la analgesia posoperatoria. Método: estudio de revisión en la literatura, en el manejo del dolor agudo posoperatorio, procedentes de países de Iberoamérica. La revisión se realizó de la literatura escrita, y además, se hizo búsqueda en Internet. En los artículos revisados se obtuvieron distintos aspectos clínicos del dolor y de planificación de la analgesia posoperatoria. Desarrollo: el dolor agudo posoperatorio produce una serie de efectos a corto y largo plazo en el paciente quirúrgico, por lo cual se requiere de una evaluación inicial previa a la cirugía, un plan anestésico individualizado y un estrecho control posoperatorio. La analgesia posoperatoria es una necesidad en el control del dolor agudo posoperatorio, que precisa de la formulación de un plan terapéutico individualizado, preventivo, consensuado y relacionado lógicamente con la realidad presente del paciente. Consideraciones finales: la elección de una correcta analgesia posoperatoria, adecuada al tipo de cirugía y al entorno del paciente, es clave para el desarrollo de una buena y efectiva recuperación funcional posoperatoria(AU)

Introduction: pain has long been frequently undervalued and inadequately managed, both in children and adults. Unfortunately, in our field we lack of schemes that guarantee pain relief entirely, because neither acute pain nor chronic pain receive adequate treatment for many different reasons. Objective: to highlight the importance of planning postoperative analgesia. Method: review study in the literature from Ibero-American countries on the management of acute postoperative pain. The review was made in the written literature, and in addition a search was made on the Internet. In the reviewed articles, different clinical aspects of pain and planning of postoperative analgesia were obtained. Development: acute postoperative pain produces a series of short and long-term effects in the surgical patient, which requires an initial evaluation prior to surgery, an individualized anesthetic plan and close postoperative control. Postoperative analgesia is a necessity in the control of acute postoperative pain, which requires the formulation of therapeutic plan that be individualized, preventive, agreed and logically related to the present reality of the patient. Final considerations: the choice of a correct postoperative analgesia that would be adequate for the type of surgery and the patient's environment is key to the development of a good and effective postoperative functional recovery(AU)

[Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of efficacy of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine on postoperative pain control]. / Bloqueio do plano abdominal transverso guiado por ultrassom em pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica: comparação da eficácia de bupivacaína e levobupivacaína no controle da dor pós­operatória.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use of transversus abdominis plane block with different local anesthetics is considered as a part of multimodal analgesia regimen in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. However no studies have been published comparing bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for transversus abdominis plane block. We aimed to compare bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Fifty patients (ASA I/II), undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two groups. Following anesthesia induction, ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block was performed with 30mL of bupivacaine 0.25% in Group B (n=25) and 30mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% in Group L (n=25) for each side. The level of pain was evaluated using 10cm visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during coughing 1, 5, 15, 30min and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24h after the operation. When visual analogue scale>3, the patients received IV tenoxicam 20mg. If visual analogue scale remained >3, they received IV. tramadol 1mg.kg-1. In case of inadequate analgesia, a rescue analgesic was given. The analgesic requirement, time to first analgesic requirement was recorded. RESULTS: Visual analogue scale levels showed no difference except first and fifth minutes postoperatively where VAS was higher in Group L (p<0.05). Analgesic requirement was similar in both groups. Time to first analgesic requirement was shorter in Group L (4.35±6.92min vs. 34.91±86.26min, p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Bupivacaine and levobupivacaine showed similar efficacy at TAP block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

[Continuous quadratus lumborum type II block in partial nephrectomy]. / Bloqueio do quadrado lombar tipo II contínuo para analgesia pós­operatória de nefrectomia parcial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Quadratus lumborum block was first described in 2007 and currently there are descriptions of its achievement through four different injection points. This blockage provides abdominal wall and visceral analgesia, and one of its mechanisms is the dispersion of the local anesthetic into the paravertebral space. We describe the performance of a continuous quadratus lumborum type II block for postoperative analgesia in a partial nephrectomy. CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old woman, scheduled for partial left laparoscopic nephrectomy. During the procedure, due to technical difficulties, an incision was made in the left flank to facilitate the surgical approach. In the early postoperative period, a continuous quadratus lumborum type II block was performed using ultrasonography as part of the multimodal analgesic strategy. Initially, 20ml of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered and 3cm of catheter were introduced into the interfascial space. Subsequently, a continuous infusion of 5.2mL.h-1 of 0.2% ropivacaine was given for 48hours. In the first 24 postoperative hours, the patient reported no pain at rest or on movement. In the following 24hours, she was free of pain at rest and only a slight pain (2/10) on movement. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous quadratus lumborum type II block was an effective postoperative analgesic option. Blocking of somatic nerves and visceral afferent pathways provided abdominal and visceral wall analgesia, allowing the reduction of opioid consumption. We consider relevant to explore the analgesic capacity of the quadratus lumborum block and its different approaches, as well as the possibility of it becoming an alternative in patients scheduled for kidney surgery.

Uso de Baixa Dose de Cetamina (+) no Pós-Operatório de Artrodese Lombar / Postoperative Low Dose Intravenous Ketamine (+) after Lumbar Arthrodesis

Introdução: A utilização de cetamina em baixas doses apresenta perspectivas promissoras na analgesia pós-operatória. Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito analgésico, poupador de opioide e a ocorrência de efeitos colaterais do uso de baixas doses de cetamina S (+) no pós-operatório de artrodese coluna lombar. Materiais e Métodos: Houve dois grupos de estudo - grupo 1 recebeu analgesia regular no pós-operatório e o grupo 2 recebeu a mesma medicação acrescida da infusão de cetamina S (+), 0,5 mg/kg/min, nas primeiras 48h. Resultados: 51 pacientes completaram o estudo (26 no grupo 1, 25 grupo no 2). Não houve diferença significativa em relação a quantidade média de morfina utilizada e ocorrência de efeitos colaterais. O valor médio de EVA foi de 4.1 no grupo 1 e 3.2 no grupo 2. Conclusão: O uso de baixas doses de cetamina S(+) no pós-operatório de artrodese lombar promove melhora da analgesia sem aumentar a incidência de efeitos adversos

Introduction: Low doses of ketamine or isomers are promising possibilities for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Objectives: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the analgesic efficacy, opioid-sparing effect and occurrence of side effect of low dose ketamine (+) in patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis. MaterialandMethod: There was two groups, group 1 received regular analgesia, group 2 received regular analgesia plus IV ketamine S(+) infusion (0,5mg/kg/min) in the first 48 hours postoperatively. Results: Fifty-one patients completed the study (25 ketamine group, 26 control group). No difference in side effects was noted between the groups. Patients in ketamine group received at median 25.9 mg IV morphine versus 26.8 in control group (P > 0.05). Pain report in VAS was 3.2 in ketamine group and 4.1 in control group (P < 00.5). Conclusion: The addition of IV low dose ketamine S(+) infusion regimen improve postoperative analgesia without increase of side effects

Pain after sternotomy - review / Dor após esternotomia - revisão

Abstract Background and objective: Adequate analgesia after sternotomy reduces postoperative adverse events. There are various methods of treating pain after heart surgery, such as infiltration with a local anesthetic, nerve block, opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alpha-adrenergic agents, intrathecal and epidural techniques, and multimodal analgesia. Content: A review of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of pain after sternotomy. We also discuss the various analgesic therapeutic modalities, emphasizing advantages and disadvantages of each technique. Conclusions: Heart surgery is performed mainly via medium sternotomy, which results in significant postoperative pain and a non-negligible incidence of chronic pain. Effective pain control improves patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. There is no clearly superior technique. It is believed that a combined multimodal analgesic regimen (using different techniques) is the best approach for treating postoperative pain, maximizing analgesia and reducing side effects.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivo: Analgesia adequada após esternotomia reduz eventos adversos no pós-operatório. Várias modalidades estão disponíveis para tratamento da dor após cirurgia cardíaca: infiltração com anestésico local, bloqueio de nervos, opioides, anti-inflamatórios não esteroidais, agentes alfa-adrenérgicos, técnicas intratecais e epidurais e analgesia multimodal. Conteúdo: Foi feita uma revisão sobre epidemiologia, fisiopatologia, prevenção e tratamento da dor após esternotomia. Também fora discutidas as diversas modalidades terapêuticas analgésicas, com ênfase em vantagens e desvantagens de cada técnica. Conclusões: A cirurgia cardíaca é feita principalmente por esternotomia média, que resulta em dor significativa no pós-operatório e uma incidência não insignificante de dor crônica. O controle efetivo da dor melhora a satisfação dos pacientes e os desfechos clínicos. Nenhuma técnica é claramente superior. Acredita-se que um regime analgésico combinado multimodal (com várias técnicas) seja a melhor abordagem para tratar a dor pós-operatória, o que maximiza a analgesia e reduz os efeitos colaterais.

Pain after sternotomy - review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Adequate analgesia after sternotomy reduces postoperative adverse events. There are various methods of treating pain after heart surgery, such as infiltration with a local anesthetic, nerve block, opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alpha-adrenergic agents, intrathecal and epidural techniques, and multimodal analgesia. CONTENT: A review of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of pain after sternotomy. We also discuss the various analgesic therapeutic modalities, emphasizing advantages and disadvantages of each technique. CONCLUSIONS: Heart surgery is performed mainly via medium sternotomy, which results in significant postoperative pain and a non-negligible incidence of chronic pain. Effective pain control improves patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. There is no clearly superior technique. It is believed that a combined multimodal analgesic regimen (using different techniques) is the best approach for treating postoperative pain, maximizing analgesia and reducing side effects.

Dexmedetomidina Intratecal para analgesia posoperatoria en cirugía de escoliosis / Dexmedetomidina Intratecal for analgesia posoperatoria in escoliosis surgery

Introducción: las deformaciones de la columna vertebral, en sentido general, constituyen una fuente de preocupación e investigación para el hombre, no solo por la repercusión estética sino también por las afecciones funcionales que estas producen. Objetivo: describir los resultados del tratamiento con dexmedetomidina intratecal para analgesia posoperatoria en cirugía de escoliosis. Método: se realizó un estudio longitudinal, prospectivo y de carácter descriptivo en el servicio de Anestesiología del Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras entre septiembre del año 2012 y enero del 2014. Resultados: en ningún paciente el dolor fue intenso, y el predominio de este en todos los momentos en que se evaluó, fue leve. En cuanto a la dosis de rescate no hubo diferencias en cuanto a los sexos con un predominio en todos los momentos de EVA leve (5 por ciento). El predominio de dosis de rescate en EVA 6 horas y EVA 12 horas fue de cero dosis con el 85 por ciento de los casos y de forma leve, En mayoría de los pacientes no fue necesaria la dosis de rescate (85 por ciento). En los casos que fueron necesarios fue predominantemente en el ángulo de Cobb entre 60º-90º.Conclusiones: todos los pacientes presentaron dolor leve con el uso de dexmedetomidina intratecal la cual resultó muy efectiva en la reducción del dolor posoperatorio. Se utilizó analgesia de rescate en el 15 por ciento de los pacientes del grupo estudio a las 6 y 12 horas(AU)

Introduction: the deformations of the spine, in general sense, constitute a source of concern and investigation for the man, not alone for the aesthetic repercussion but also for the functional affections that these they take place. Objective: to describe the results of the treatment with dexmedetomidina intratecal for analgesia posoperatoria in escoliosis surgery. Method: he/she was carried out a longitudinal, prospective study and of descriptive character in the service of Anesthesiology of the Hospital Siblings Ameijeiras among September of the year 2012 and January of the 2014. Results: in any patient the pain was intense, and the prevalence of this in all the moments in that it was evaluated, was light. As for the rescue dose there were not differences as for the sexes with a prevalence in light EVA'S moments (5 percent). The prevalence of rescue dose in EVA 6 hours and EVA 12 hours it was of zero dose with 85 percent of the cases and in a light way, In the patients' majority it was not necessary the rescue dose (85 percent). In the cases that were necessary it was predominantly in the angle of Cobb among 60º-90º. Conclusions: all the patients presented light pain with the use of dexmedetomidina intratecal which was very effective in the reduction of the pain posoperatorio. Rescue analgesia was used in 15 percent of the patients from the group study to the 6 and 12 hours(AU)