UBX-390: A Novel Androgen Receptor Degrader for Therapeutic Intervention in Prostate Cancer.

The androgen receptor (AR) is an attractive target for treating prostate cancer, considering its role in the development and progression of localized and metastatic prostate cancer. The high global mortality burden of prostate cancer, despite medical treatments such as androgen deprivation or AR antagonist therapy, highlights the need to explore alternative strategies. One strategy involves the use of heterobifunctional degraders, also known as proteolysis-targeting chimeras, which are novel small-molecule therapeutics that inhibit amplified or mutated targets. Here, the study reports a novel cereblon-based AR degrader, UBX-390, and demonstrates its superior activity over established AR degraders, such as ARV-110 or ARCC-4, in prostate cancer cells under short- and long-term treatment conditions. UBX-390 suppresses chromatin binding and gene expression of AR and demonstrates substantial efficacy in the degradation of AR mutants in patients with treatment-resistant prostate cancer. UBX-390 is presented as an optimized AR degrader with remarkable potential for treating castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Androgen receptor post-translational modifications and their implications for pathology.

A major mechanism to modulate the biological activities of the androgen receptor (AR) involves a growing number of post-translational modifications (PTMs). In this review we summarise the current knowledge on the structural and functional impact of PTMs that affect this major transcription factor. Next, we discuss the cross-talk between these different PTMs and the presence of clusters of modified residues in the AR protein. Finally, we discuss the implications of these covalent modifications for the aetiology of diseases such as spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (Kennedy's disease) and prostate cancer, and the perspectives for pharmacological intervention.

Comparison of oncological outcomes of upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitors and combined androgen blockade in Japanese patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

In recent years, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) prolong overall survival (OS) compared with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or combined androgen blockade (CAB) in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). However, it remains unclear whether upfront ARSI is superior to CAB in Asian populations, among which the efficacy of ADT/CAB is considered relatively high. In this study, we compared the oncological outcomes of upfront ARSI and CAB in Japanese patients with mCSPC. Patients with mCSPC who underwent systemic therapy between May 2009 and October 2023 were enrolled retrospectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare the castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPC-FS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and OS between patients treated with upfront ARSI (ARSI group) and those treated with CAB (CAB group). In total, 30 and 142 patients were enrolled in the ARSI and CAB groups, respectively. After PSM (25 patients in each group), CRPC-FS was significantly longer in the ARSI group than in the CAB group (median: 36.7 vs. 12.3 months, hazard ratio: 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.97, p = 0.035). No significant differences were observed in CSS or OS between the two groups. In conclusion, when compared to CAB, upfront ARSI might have the potential to extend CRPC-FS among individuals in the Japanese population.

Cardio-oncology in advanced prostate cancer.

Treatment intensification with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPi) have led to improved survival in advanced prostate cancer. However, ADT is linked to significant cardiovascular toxicity, and ARPi also negatively impacts cardiovascular health. Together with a higher prevalence of baseline cardiovascular risk factors reported among prostate cancer survivors at diagnosis, there is a pressing need to prioritise and optimise cardiovascular health in this population. Firstly, While no dedicated cardiovascular toxicity risk calculators are available, other tools such as SCORE2 can be used for baseline cardiovascular risk assessment. Next, selected patients on combination therapy may benefit from de-escalation of ADT to minimise its toxicities while maintaining cancer control. These patients can be characterised by an exceptional PSA response to hormonal treatment, favourable disease characteristics and competing comorbidities that warrant a less aggressive treatment regime. In addition, emerging molecular and genomic biomarkers hold the potential to identify patients who are suited for a de-escalated treatment approach either with ADT or with ARPi. One such biomarker is AR-V7 splice variant that predicts resistance to ARPi. Lastly, optimization of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors for patients through a coherent framework (ABCDE) and exercise therapy is equally important. This article aims to comprehensively review the cardiovascular impact of hormonal manipulation in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, propose overarching strategies to mitigate cardiovascular toxicity associated with hormonal treatment, and, most importantly, raise awareness about the detrimental cardiovascular effects inherent in our current management strategies involving hormonal agents.

Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: How Do We Treat Patients with cN1 Disease?

Radiotherapy (RT) for high-risk localized prostate cancer (HRLPC) can be controversial in the context of increasing detection of suspicious lymph nodes via advanced imaging techniques. The EORTC 22683 trial initially established RT with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as the standard of care for HRLPC, but many patients remain uncured. GETUG-AFU-12 showed that addition of docetaxel and estramustine to ADT improved relapse-free survival but not overall survival. STAMPEDE later demonstrated that abiraterone acetate with ADT and RT significantly improved failure-free survival and overall survival. Ongoing trials such as ENZARAD, ATLAS, DASL-HiCap, and GETUG-P17 ALADDIN are investigating the efficacy of new androgen receptor pathway inhibitors combined with RT and ADT. These studies aim to refine treatment strategies for HRLPC, particularly in the context of advanced imaging and patient upstaging. PATIENT SUMMARY: Addition of newer medications to standard radiation therapy has shown promise in improving survival for men with high-risk prostate cancer. Ongoing studies are testing these options to find the best combination. The aim is to increase the chances of curing prostate cancer, especially as advanced scan techniques are detecting more cases.

Transcriptomic response of prostate cancer cells to carbon ion and photon irradiation with focus on androgen receptor and TP53 signaling.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy is essential in the treatment of prostate cancer. An alternative to conventional photon radiotherapy is the application of carbon ions, which provide a superior intratumoral dose distribution and less induced damage to adjacent healthy tissue. A common characteristic of prostate cancer cells is their dependence on androgens which is exploited therapeutically by androgen deprivation therapy in the advanced prostate cancer stage. Here, we aimed to analyze the transcriptomic response of prostate cancer cells to irradiation by photons in comparison to carbon ions, focusing on DNA damage, DNA repair and androgen receptor signaling. METHODS: Prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP (functional TP53 and androgen receptor signaling) and DU145 (dysfunctional TP53 and androgen receptor signaling) were irradiated by photons or carbon ions and the subsequent DNA damage was assessed by immuno-cytofluorescence. Furthermore, the cells were treated with an androgen-receptor agonist. The effects of irradiation and androgen treatment on the gene regulation and the transcriptome were investigated by RT-qPCR and RNA sequencing, followed by bioinformatic analysis. RESULTS: Following photon or carbon ion irradiation, both LNCaP and DU145 cells showed a dose-dependent amount of visible DNA damage that decreased over time, indicating occurring DNA repair. In terms of gene regulation, mRNAs involved in the TP53-dependent DNA damage response were significantly upregulated by photons and carbon ions in LNCaP but not in DU145 cells, which generally showed low levels of gene regulation after irradiation. Both LNCaP and DU145 cells responded to photons and carbon ions by downregulation of genes involved in DNA repair and cell cycle, partially resembling the transcriptome response to the applied androgen receptor agonist. Neither photons nor carbon ions significantly affected canonical androgen receptor-dependent gene regulation. Furthermore, certain genes that were specifically regulated by either photon or carbon ion irradiation were identified. CONCLUSION: Photon and carbon ion irradiation showed a significant congruence in terms of induced signaling pathways and transcriptomic responses. These responses were strongly impacted by the TP53 status. Nevertheless, irradiation mode-dependent distinct gene regulations with undefined implication for radiotherapy outcome were revealed. Androgen receptor signaling and irradiations shared regulation of certain genes with respect to DNA-repair and cell-cycle.

Practical implications of androgen receptor inhibitors for prostate cancer treatment.

Antiandrogens have been used for the treatment of prostate cancer as a single agent or in combination with hormone deprivation therapy. New generation antiandrogens act like androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs). Their binding complex blocks the pathways of cellular proliferation and differentiation of the prostate. Enzalutamide, apalutamide and darolutamide are the new ARIs that demonstrated acceptable tolerability and toxicity, both active in hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). There is no evidence of superiority of one drug over the other, therefore the therapeutic choice depends on the safety profile in relation to the individual patient, their comorbidities and clinical condition. ARIs have also shown promising results in association with new drugs that are active on patients with metastatic CRPC carrying the mutated breast cancer gene (BRCA). Before undergoing new antiandrogenic therapies, patients should be evaluated for cardiological and metabolic risk and possible drug interactions.

Androgen receptor-mediated pharmacogenomic expression quantitative trait loci: implications for breast cancer response to AR-targeting therapy.

BACKGROUND: Endocrine therapy is the most important treatment modality of breast cancer patients whose tumors express the estrogen receptor α (ERα). The androgen receptor (AR) is also expressed in the vast majority (80-90%) of ERα-positive tumors. AR-targeting drugs are not used in clinical practice, but have been evaluated in multiple trials and preclinical studies. METHODS: We performed a genome-wide study to identify hormone/drug-induced single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype - dependent gene-expression, known as PGx-eQTL, mediated by either an AR agonist (dihydrotestosterone) or a partial antagonist (enzalutamide), utilizing a previously well characterized lymphoblastic cell line panel. The association of the identified SNPs-gene pairs with breast cancer phenotypes were then examined using three genome-wide association (GWAS) studies that we have published and other studies from the GWAS catalog. RESULTS: We identified 13 DHT-mediated PGx-eQTL loci and 23 Enz-mediated PGx-eQTL loci that were associated with breast cancer outcomes post ER antagonist or aromatase inhibitors (AI) treatment, or with pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of AIs. An additional 30 loci were found to be associated with cancer risk and sex-hormone binding globulin levels. The top loci involved the genes IDH2 and TMEM9, the expression of which were suppressed by DHT in a PGx-eQTL SNP genotype-dependent manner. Both of these genes were overexpressed in breast cancer and were associated with a poorer prognosis. Therefore, suppression of these genes by AR agonists may benefit patients with minor allele genotypes for these SNPs. CONCLUSIONS: We identified AR-related PGx-eQTL SNP-gene pairs that were associated with risks, outcomes and PD effects of endocrine therapy that may provide potential biomarkers for individualized treatment of breast cancer.

Low androgen/progesterone or high oestrogen/androgen receptors ratio in serous ovarian cancer predicts longer survival.

The treatment of ovarian cancer (OC) remains one of the greatest challenges in gynaecological oncology. The presence of classic steroid receptors in OC makes hormone therapy an attractive option; however, the response of OC to hormone therapy is modest. Here, we compared the expression patterns of progesterone (PGR), androgen (AR) and oestrogen alpha (ERα) receptors between serous OC cell lines and non-cancer ovarian cells. These data were analysed in relation to steroid receptor expression profiles from patient tumour samples and survival outcomes using a bioinformatics approach. The results showed that ERα, PGR and AR were co-expressed in OC cell lines, and patient samples from high-grade and low-grade OC co-expressed at least two steroid receptors. High AR expression was negatively correlated, whereas ERα and PGR expression was positively correlated with patient survival. AR showed the opposite expression pattern to that of ERα and PGR in type 1 (SKOV-3) and 2 (OVCAR-3) OC cell lines compared with non-cancer (HOSEpiC) ovarian cells, with AR downregulated in type 1 and upregulated in type 2 OC. A low AR/PGR ratio and a high ESR1/AR ratio were associated with favourable survival outcomes in OC compared with other receptor ratios. Although the results must be interpreted with caution because of the small number of primary tumour samples analysed, they nevertheless suggest that the evaluation of ERα, AR and PGR by immunohistochemistry should be performed in patient biological material to plan future clinical trials.

Synthesis of curcumin derivatives targeting androgen receptor for castration-resistant prostate cancer therapy.

In this work, a series of curcumin derivatives (1a-1h, 2a-2g, and 3a-3c) were synthesized for the suppression of castration-resistant prostate cancer cells. All synthesized compounds were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HRMS, and melting point. The in vitro cytotoxicity study shows that compounds 1a, 1e, 1f, 1h, 2g, 3a, and 3c display similar or enhanced cytotoxicity against 22Rv1 and C4-2 cells as compared to ASC-J9, other synthesized compounds display reduced cytotoxicity against 22Rv1 and C4-2 cells as compared to ASC-J9. Molecular docking simulation was performed to study the binding affinity and probable binding modes of the synthesized compounds with androgen receptor. The results show that all synthesized compounds exhibit higher cdocker interaction energies as compared to ASC-J9. Compounds 1h, 2g, and 3c not only show strong cytotoxicity against 22Rv1 and C4-2 cells but also exhibit high binding affinity with androgen receptor. In androgen receptor suppression study, compounds 1f and 2g show similar androgen receptor suppression effect as compared to ASC-J9 on C4-2 cells, compound 3c displays significantly enhanced AR suppression effect as compared to ASC-J9, 1f and 2g. Compounds 1a, 1e, 1f, 1h, 2g, 3a and 3c prepared in this work have significant potential for castration-resistant prostate cancer therapy.

Efficacy and safety of androgen receptor inhibitors for treatment of advanced prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

AIMS: Androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) have become an effective treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PC). However, it is unknown which ARI is the most helpful and safe for men with advanced PC. Our aim is to help physicians make clinical decisions and provide medication guidelines for patients with advanced PC to avoid potential risks when using ARIs for treatment. METHODS: We systematically searched the following databases: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, with a literature publication deadline of February 2023. The primary efficacy outcomes were 18-month overall survival (OS), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), hypertension and fatigue. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed by Stata 15.1, and Revman 5.3 was used to assess the included studies' risk of bias. RESULTS: The analysis included 26 trials with 26 263 people. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) concluded that enzalutamide (86.8%) showed the best effect in prolonging the OS of patients. Flutamide led to the highest risk of TEAEs (29.9%) and AEs leading to discontinuation (12.8%). Apalutamide (13.4%) led to the highest risk of grade ≥3 TEAEs. Enzalutamide had the highest risk of hypertension (0.2%), grade ≥3 hypertension (4.5%) and fatigue (5.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This NMA indicates there is no one ARI to reach both the most effective and safe therapy aims for treating advanced PC and that there is a compromise between the efficacy and safety of ARIs in the treatment of advanced PC. Physicians should weigh the risks to safety against the anticipated benefits when prescribing these drugs to patients with PC.

Disruption of zebrafish sex differentiation by emerging contaminants hexafluoropropylene oxides at environmental concentrations via antagonizing androgen receptor pathways.

As alternatives of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), hexafluoropropylene oxide dimeric acid (HFPO-DA) and trimeric acid (HFPO-TA) have been detected increasingly in environmental media and even humans. They have been shown to exhibit reproductive toxicity to model species, but their effects on human remain unclear due to the knowledge gap in their mode of action. Herein, (anti-)androgenic effects of the two HFPOs and PFOA were investigated and underlying toxicological mechanism was explored by combining zebrafish test, cell assay and molecular docking simulation. Exposure of juvenile zebrafish to the chemicals during sex differentiation promoted feminization, with HFPO-TA acting at an environmental concentration of 1 µg/L. The chemicals inhibited proliferation of human prostate cells and transcriptional activity of human and zebrafish androgen receptors (AR), with HFPO-TA displaying the strongest potency. Molecular docking revealed that the chemicals bind to AR in a conformation similar to a known AR antagonist. Combined in vivo, in vitro and in silico results demonstrated that the chemicals disrupted sex differentiation likely by antagonizing AR-mediated pathways, and provided more evidence that HFPO-TA is not a safe alternative to PFOA.

Exploring the potentials of S4, a selective androgen receptor modulator, in glioblastoma multiforme therapy.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) ranks among the prevalent neoplastic diseases globally, presenting challenges in therapeutic management. Traditional modalities have yielded suboptimal response rates due to its intrinsic pathological resistance. This underscores the imperative for identifying novel molecular targets to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Literature indicates a notable correlation between androgen receptor (AR) signaling and GBM pathogenesis. To mitigate the adverse effects associated with androgenic modulation of AR, scientists have pivoted towards the synthesis of non-steroidal anabolic agents, selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs). Among these, S4, used as a supplement by the bodybuilders to efficiently grow muscle mass with favourable oral bioavailability has emerged as a candidate of interest. This investigation substantiates the anti-oncogenic potential of S4 in temozolomide-responsive and -resistant GBM cells through cellular and molecular evaluations. We observed restriction in GBM cell growth, and motility, coupled with an induction of apoptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and cellular senescence. S4 exposure precipitated the upregulation of genes associated with apoptosis, cell-cycle arrest, DNA damage response, and senescence, while concurrently downregulating those involved in cellular proliferation. Future research endeavours are warranted to delineate the mechanisms underpinning S4's actions, assess its antineoplastic effects in-vivo, and its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier.

Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the efficacy of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used due to their affordability and minimal severe side effects. However, their influence on the efficacy of cancer treatments, particularly androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), remains unclear. This study investigates the impact of PPI usage on the treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: A total of 117 mCRPC patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups based on the concomitant use of PPI at the initiation of ARSI treatment: PPI+ (n = 38) and PPI- (n = 79). Patient characteristics, including age at ARSI treatment administered, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value at ARSI treatment administered, International Society of Urological Pathology grade group at prostate biopsy, metastatic site at ARSI treatment administered, prior docetaxel (DTX) treatment, and type of ARSI (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) were recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and PSA response rates were compared between the two groups. Patients were further stratified by clinical background to compare PFS and OS between the two groups. RESULTS: The PPI- group exhibited significantly extended PFS and a trend toward improved OS. For PSA response (reduction of 50% or more from baseline), the rates were 62.3% and 45.9% in the PPI- group and the PPI+ group, respectively. For deep PSA response (reductions of 90% or more from baseline), the rates were 36.4% and 24.3% in the PPI- group and the PPI+ group, respectively. The effects were consistent across subgroups divided by prior DTX treatment and type of ARSI administered. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of PPIs appears to diminish the therapeutic efficacy of ARSIs in mCRPC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the biological mechanisms involved.

Hormonal Agents in Localized and Advanced Prostate Cancer: Current Use and Future Perspectives.

Prostate cancer (PC) is generally a hormone-dependent tumor. Androgen deprivation therapy ( has been the standard of care in metastatic disease for more than 80 years. Subsequent studies have highlighted the efficacy of ADT even in earlier disease settings such as in localized disease or in the case of biochemical recurrence (BCR). Improved knowledge of PC biology and ADT resistance mechanisms have led to the development of novel generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). Initially used only in patients who became resistant to ADT, ARPI have subsequently shown to be effective when used in patients with metastatic hormone-naive disease and in recent years their effectiveness has also been evaluated in localized disease and in case of BCR. The objective of this review is to describe the current role of agents interfering with the androgen receptor in different stages of PC and to point out future perspectives.

Detection of nonsteroidal and steroidal selective androgen receptor modulators in equine hair after oral administrations.

This paper describes the detections of nonsteroidal and steroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs), namely, RAD140 and YK-11, in mane hair collected from horses having been orally administered with the respective drugs. SARMs are potent anabolic agents with a high potential of misuse in horseracing and equestrian sports, and the misuses of RAD140 and YK-11 in human sports have been reported. To better control the misuse of RAD140 and YK-11 in horses, two separate oral administration studies of RAD140 (0.3 mg/kg daily for 3 days) and YK-11 (0.2 mg/kg daily for 3 days) were previously conducted to investigate their metabolism and to identify target analyte(s) with the longest detection time in urine and plasma for doping control. In this work, segmental analyses of post-administration hair samples have revealed that (i) RAD140 and YK-11 could be detected in horse mane after oral administration and (ii) internal incorporation of RAD140 into hair via bloodstream and external incorporation through sweat or sebum were both observed, whereas YK-11 was primarily incorporated into hair via sweat or sebum.

Latrophilins as Downstream Effectors of Androgen Receptors including a Splice Variant, AR-V7, Induce Prostate Cancer Progression.

Latrophilins (LPHNs), a group of the G-protein-coupled receptor to which a spider venom latrotoxin (LTX) is known to bind, remain largely uncharacterized in neoplastic diseases. In the present study, we aimed to determine the role of LPHNs in the progression of prostate cancer. We assessed the actions of LPHNs, including LPHN1, LPHN2, and LPHN3, in human prostate cancer lines via their ligand (e.g., α-LTX, FLRT3) treatment or shRNA infection, as well as in surgical specimens. In androgen receptor (AR)-positive LNCaP/C4-2/22Rv1 cells, dihydrotestosterone considerably increased the expression levels of LPHNs, while chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed the binding of endogenous ARs, including AR-V7, to the promoter region of each LPHN. Treatment with α-LTX or FLRT3 resulted in induction in the cell viability and migration of both AR-positive and AR-negative lines. α-LTX and FLRT3 also enhanced the expression of Bcl-2 and phosphorylated forms of JAK2 and STAT3. Meanwhile, the knockdown of each LPHN showed opposite effects on all of those mediated by ligand treatment. Immunohistochemistry in radical prostatectomy specimens further showed the significantly elevated expression of each LPHN in prostate cancer, compared with adjacent normal-appearing prostate, which was associated with a significantly higher risk of postoperative biochemical recurrence in both univariate and multivariable settings. These findings indicate that LPHNs function as downstream effectors of ARs and promote the growth of androgen-sensitive, castration-resistant, or even AR-negative prostate cancer.

Is There an Opportunity to De-Escalate Treatments in Selected Patients with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer?

The treatment landscape for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer continues to evolve, with systemic treatment being the mainstay of current treatment. Prognostic and predictive factors such as tumour volume and disease presentation have been studied to assess responses to different treatments. Intensification and de-escalation strategies arouse great interest, so several trials are being developed to further personalize the therapy in these populations. Is there an optimal sequence and a possible option to de-intensify treatment in selected patients with a favourable profile? This and other goals will be the subject of this review.

Casein Kinase 1α-A Target for Prostate Cancer Therapy?

The androgen receptor (AR) is a key driver of prostate cancer (PCa) and, as such, current mainstay treatments target this molecule. However, resistance commonly arises to these therapies and, therefore, additional targets must be evaluated to improve patient outcomes. Consequently, alternative approaches for indirectly targeting the AR are sought. AR crosstalk with other signalling pathways, including several protein kinase signalling cascades, has been identified as a potential route to combat therapy resistance. The casein kinase 1 (CK1) family of protein kinases phosphorylate a multitude of substrates, allowing them to regulate a diverse range of pathways from the cell cycle to DNA damage repair. As well as its role in several signalling pathways that are de-regulated in PCa, mutational data suggest its potential to promote prostate carcinogenesis. CK1α is one isoform predicted to regulate AR activity via phosphorylation and has been implicated in the progression of several other cancer types. In this review, we explore how the normal biological function of CK1 is de-regulated in cancer, the impact on signalling pathways and how this contributes towards prostate tumourigenesis, with a particular focus on the CK1α isoform as a novel therapeutic target for PCa.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Oligoprogression in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Early Toxicity Analysis of the TRAP Trial.

AIMS: To assess toxicity and patient quality of life after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to oligoprogressive disease (OPD) in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) on androgen receptor targeted agents (ARTA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This phase II trial enrolled patients with metastatic CRPC with ≤ 2 oligoprogressive lesions in bone, lymph node, lung, or prostate. All patients were receiving systemic treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide at the time of oligoprogression. All patients received SBRT to the OPD site(s) and continued the current ARTA. Patients received 30 Gy in 5 fractions (alternate days) to the OPD site. The primary endpoint of the trial is to assess if SBRT to OPD sites results in progression free survival of >6 months. The primary endpoint for this toxicity analysis is the rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events at any timepoint up to 6 months after SBRT. Secondary endpoints included comparing pre- and post-SBRT patient-related outcomes reported using visual analogue scale scores and EQ-5D health questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty enrolled patients had at least 6 months of follow-up at the time of analysis. Grade 3 or higher toxicity from any cause recorded using common terminology criteria for adverse events and radiation therapy oncology group was found in 8/40 (20%) of patients, but only 1/40 (2.5%) was deemed possibly related to SBRT. There was no significant difference in mean EQ5D visual analogue scale score from baseline to each timepoint after SBRT (p = 0.449). CONCLUSION: In this prospective phase II clinical trial for OPD whilst on ARTA in the CRPC setting, we report low grade ≥ 3 toxicity after SBRT. There is no discernible change in patient-reported quality of life due to SBRT treatment. The final results of progression-free survival and toxicity of SBRT treatment will be reported once further follow-up is complete.