Corrigendum: Prescription pattern and effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs in patients with aortic dissection who underwent surgery.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1291900.].

Candesartan Attenuates Vasculitis in a Mouse Model of Kawasaki Disease Induced by Candida albicans Water-Soluble Fraction.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for Kawasaki disease is immunoglobulin therapy, but the high frequency of coronary sequelae in immunoglobulin-refractory cases indicates a need for further improvement in treatment. METHODS: Kawasaki disease-like vasculitis was induced in 5-week-old DBA/2 mice by intraperitoneal administration of 0.5 mg Candida albicans water-soluble fraction (CAWS) daily for 5 days followed by daily administration of candesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker. The vasculitis suppression effect was confirmed histologically and serologically in mice sacrificed at 28 days after the start of candesartan. RESULTS: The area of inflammatory cell infiltration at the aortic root was 2.4±1.4% in the Control group, 18.1±1.9% in the CAWS group, and 7.1±2.3%, 5.8±1.4%, 7.6±2.4%, and 7.9±5.0% in the CAWS+candesartan 0.125-mg/kg, 0.25-mg/kg, 0.5-mg/kg, and 1.0-mg/kg groups, respectively (p=0.0200, p=0.0122, p=0.0122, and p=0.0200 vs. CAWS, respectively). The low-dose candesartan group also showed significantly reduced inflammatory cell infiltration. A similar trend was confirmed by immunostaining of macrophages and TGFß receptors. Measurement of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α confirmed the anti-vasculitis effect of candesartan. CONCLUSIONS: Candesartan inhibited vasculitis even at clinical doses used in children, making it a strong future candidate as an additional treatment for immunoglobulin-refractory Kawasaki disease.

Prevention of anthracycline-t and trastuzumabinduced decline in left ventricular ejection fraction with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker: a narrative systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a complication of selected cancer therapy agents associated with decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have established benefits in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but their efficacy for preventing CTRCD remains controversial. This narrative systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of ACEI/ARB in the prevention of cancer therapy LVEF decline. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane from January 1980 to June 2022. Studies of interest were randomised controlled trials of patients with normal LVEF and active malignancy receiving cancer therapy, randomised to receive either an ACEI or ARB compared with a control group. The outcome was the change in LVEF from baseline to the end of the follow-up period. Death, clinical heart failure and adverse drug reactions were recorded. A total of 3731 search records were screened and 12 studies were included, comprising a total of 1645 participants. Nine studies assessed the prevention of anthracycline-induced LVEF decline, of which five showed a beneficial effect (1%-14% higher LVEF in treated groups), whereas four studies showed no effect. Three studies assessed the prevention of trastuzumab-induced LVEF decline, of which one showed a beneficial effect (4% higher LVEF) in a subset of participants. There are mixed data regarding the efficacy of ACEI/ARB in preventing the LVEF decline in patients undergoing anthracycline or trastuzumab therapy, with evidence suggesting no clinically meaningful benefit observed in recent studies.

Pathophysiological Link and Treatment Implication of Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) results from a complex interplay of age, genetic, cardiac remodeling, and concomitant comorbidities including hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Renal failure is an important comorbidity of HFpEF, as well as a major pathophysiological mechanism for those patients at risk of developing HFpEF. Heart failure (HF) and CKD are intertwined conditions sharing common disease pathways; the so-called "kidney tamponade", explained by an increase in intracapsular pressure caused by fluid retention, is only the latest model to explain renal injury in HF. Recognizing the different phenotypes of HFpEF remains a real challenge; the pathophysiological mechanisms of renal dysfunction may differ across the HF spectrum, as well as the prognostic role. A better understanding of the role of cardiorenal interactions in patients with HF in terms of symptom status, disease progression, and prognosis remains essential in HF management. Historically, patients with HF and CKD have been scarcely represented in clinical trial populations. Current concerns affect the practical approach to HF treatment, and, in this context, physicians are frequently hesitant to prescribe and titrate both new and old treatments. Therefore, the extensive application of HF drugs in diverse HF subtypes with numerous comorbidities and different renal dysfunction etiologies remains a controversial matter of discussion. Numerous recently introduced drugs, such as sodium-glucose-linked transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), constitute a new therapeutic option for patients with HF and CKD. Because of their protective vascular and hormonal actions, the use of these agents may be safely extended to patients with renal dysfunction in the long term. The present review delves into the phenotype of patients with HFpEF and CKD from a pathophysiological perspective, proposing a treatment approach that suggests a practical stepwise algorithm for the proper application of life-saving therapies in clinical practice.

Association between types of antihypertensive medication and the risk of atrial fibrillation: a nationwide population study.

Background: Patients with hypertension are at a high risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). Recent research has indicated the varying effects of antihypertensive medications on developing AF. Objectives: We investigated the relationship between different types of antihypertensive medications and the risk of AF occurrence. Methods: We analyzed data from 113,582 subjects with national health screening examinations between 2009 and 2014. The study population was categorized according to antihypertensive medication type. The primary outcome was the incidence of AF. Results: Among 113,582 subjects (mean age 59.4 ± 12.0 years, 46.7% men), 93,557 received monotherapy [angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCB), or diuretics], while 34,590 received combination therapy (ARB/beta-blockers, ARB/CCB, ARB/diuretics, or ARB/CCB/diuretics). During a mean follow-up duration of 7.6 ± 2.1 years, 3.9% of patients were newly diagnosed with AF. In monotherapy, ACEi and CCB had similar AF risks as ARB, while beta-blockers and diuretics showed higher AF risks than ARB. In combination therapy, ARBs/CCBs and ARBs/diuretics had the lowest AF risk, whereas ARBs/beta-blockers had the highest compared to ARB/CCB. Among the specific ARBs, the AF risk varied insignificantly, except for telmisartan and candesartan. Conclusions: In hypertensive patients receiving monotherapy, ACEi and CCB showed a similar AF risk as ARBs, while beta-blockers and diuretics were associated with a higher risk. Among those receiving combination therapy, ARBs/CCBs and ARBs/diuretics had the lowest AF risk, whereas ARBs/beta-blockers showed the highest risk. Various types of ARBs have different associations with AF risk.

Sacubitril/valsartan compared to equivalent/sub-equivalent dose angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

PURPOSE: The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine how sacubitril/valsartan (SV) compares to equivalent and sub-equivalent angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: The databases of PubMed and EMBASE were used to identify those randomized controlled trials which compared SV to ARB/ACEI in patients with HFrEF. Only those trials that reported outcomes regarding total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and worsening heart failure were considered. Meta-analysis was performed separately in those patients receiving equivalent doses of ARB/ACEI and those receiving sub-equivalent doses. Equivalent doses were SV 97/103 = valsartan 160 mg twice daily = enalapril 20 mg twice daily = ramipril 5 mg twice daily. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4. RESULTS: Twelve randomized trials were identified involving 17,484 patients: 11,291 in the sub-equivalent group (8 trials) and 6193 in the equivalent group (4 trials). Meta-analyses showed there were no statistical differences regarding the outcomes of total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and worsening heart failure in the equivalent dosing group. However, SV reduced total mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.78-0.93, p < 0.001), cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.73-0.90, p ≤ 0.001) and worsening heart failure (RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64-0.92, p = 0.005) in the sub-equivalent group. CONCLUSION: When compared to equivalent doses of ARB/ACEI, SV is not superior in reducing mortality and worsening heart failure. SV is superior when compared to sub-equivalent doses of ACEI.

Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in chronic Type B aortic dissection combined with mild hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Optimal antihypertensive medication for chronic Type B aortic dissection remains undecided. This study compared the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan with valsartan to determine suitable antihypertensive drug combinations. METHODS: In this single-center, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, patients with chronic Stanford type B aortic dissection and mild hypertension were randomized to receive sacubitril/valsartan 100/200 mg or valsartan 80/160 mg. The primary endpoint was the reduction in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) at Week 8 in patients with sacubitril/valsartan versus valsartan. Key secondary endpoints included changes in 1) mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP); 2) pulse pressure; and 3) mean ambulatory blood pressure for 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime. Safety assessments included adverse events and serious adverse events. This trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier: ChiCTR2300073399. RESULTS: A total of 315 patients completed the study. Sacubitril/valsartan provided a significantly greater reduction in msSBP than valsartan at Week 8 (between-treatment difference: -5.1 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI) -5.8 to -4.5], P < 0.001). Reductions in msSBP, msDBP, and pulse pressure as well as the mean ambulatory blood pressure for 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime, were significantly greater in sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan (all P < 0.001). No excessive episodes of adverse events occurred in the sacubitril/valsartan group. CONCLUSION: Sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan reduced BP compared with baseline values. However, sacubitril/valsartan improved blood pressure control to a greater extent than valsartan. It may offer a new treatment option for patients with mild hypertension and chronic Type B aortic dissection.

Immunoglobulin A glomerulonephropathy: A review.

In this editorial, we comment on the article by Meng et al published in the World Journal of Clinical Cases. We comprehensively review immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), including epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management. IgAN, also known as Berger's disease, is the most frequent type of primary glomerulonephritis (GN) globally. It is mostly found among the Asian population. The presentation can be variable, from microscopic hematuria to a rapidly progressive GN. Around 50% of patients present with single or recurring episodes of gross hematuria. An upper respiratory infection and tonsillitis often precede these episodes. Around 30% of patients present microscopic hematuria with or without proteinuria, usually detected on routine examination. The diagnosis relies on having a renal biopsy for pathology and immunofluorescence microscopy. We focus on risk stratification and management of IgAN. We provide a review of all the landmark studies to date. According to the 2021 KDIGO (kidney disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines, patients with non-variant form IgAN are first treated conservatively for three to six months. This approach consists of adequate blood pressure control, reduction of proteinuria with renin-angiotensin system blockade, treatment of dyslipidemia, and lifestyle modifications (weight loss, exercise, smoking cessation, and dietary sodium restrictions). Following three to six months of conservative therapy, patients are further classified as high or low risk for disease progression. High-risk patients have proteinuria ≥ 1 g/d or < 1 g/d with significant microscopic hematuria and active inflammation on kidney biopsy. Some experts consider proteinuria ≥ 2 g/d to be very high risk. Patients with high and very high-risk profiles are treated with immunosuppressive therapy. A proteinuria level of < 1 g/d and stable/improved renal function indicates a good treatment response for patients on immunosuppressive therapy.

Should renin-angiotensin system inhibitors be held prior to major surgery?

Many patients undergoing surgical procedures have a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, or a combination. Often, these conditions involve the chronic use of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). Observational studies have suggested that continuing ACEIs/ARBs before major noncardiac surgery can increase the risk of intraoperative hypotension, which might drive postoperative complications such as acute kidney injury, myocardial injury, or stroke. Strong recommendations on how to manage ACEIs/ARBs before surgery are, however, lacking owing to insufficient evidence, mostly limited to data from observational studies. Recently, the SPACE trial investigated the impact of preoperative management of ACEIs/ARBs on postoperative myocardial injury. Myocardial injury occurred in 48.3% patients randomised to discontinue and 41.3% patients randomised to continue ACEI/ARB (odds ratio for continuing: 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.45-1.31). Patients randomised to the 'Stop' group experienced more postoperative hypertension. In a post hoc analysis, patients randomised to the 'Continue' group with low preoperative NT-proBNP concentrations (<100 pg ml-1) experienced less myocardial injury after surgery than the 'Stop' group, whereas no significant difference was observed in patients with elevated preoperative NT-proBNP concentrations. The SPACE trial provides important and new reassuring data on the safety of continuing ACEIs/ARBs before major surgery, challenging previous beliefs.

The association between losartan potassium prescription and postoperative outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: A TriNetX analysis.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical procedure performed to alleviate pain and improve functional outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis who have failed conservative treatments. Arthrofibrosis has been extensively studied due to its negative impact on TKA outcomes. Losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), has the potential to improve TKA outcomes by inhibiting TGF-ß and decreasing fibrosis. This study aims to analyze a large-scale, real-world healthcare database to investigate the association between losartan potassium prescription and postoperative outcomes such as readmissions, ED visits, and the need for MUA or revision TKA. HYPOTHESIS: Based on previous literature and the nature of ARBs, it is expected that the addition of losartan will aid in better outcomes for patients following a primary TKA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, the TriNetX Research Network (TriNetX) database was queried as of June 21, 2023. All patients who underwent a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prior to June 21, 2022 were included. Patients were then divided into two cohorts by whether they had an active losartan potassium prescription within the year prior to their surgery to within 90days postoperatively. Patients were then propensity-matched to eliminate differences in demographics and comorbidities. RESULTS: Losartan TKA patients were 1.18 [OR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90), p<0.001] times less likely to be readmitted within 90days and were 1.15 (OR: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.96); p=0.009) times less likely to undergo a manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) within the 1-year postoperative period. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of emergency department (ED) visits at 90days postoperatively or revision TKAs at 1year postoperatively. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, patients with an active losartan prescription prior to TKA had a significantly lower likelihood of readmission within 90days and a lower likelihood of undergoing MUA within the 1-year postoperative period compared to patients not taking losartan. This presents an opportunity for further clinical investigation to explore the value of losartan in TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; an observational cohort study.

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus that of angiotensin receptor blockers on survival in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a nationwide observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the patient survival rates based on the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) in a large cohort of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD). METHODS: Data from a national HD quality assessment program were used in this retrospective study. The patients were classified into four groups based on the use of renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) as follows: No group, patients without a prescription of any anti-hypertensive drugs including RASBs; Other group, patients with a prescription of anti-hypertensive drugs excluding RASBs; ACEI group, patients with a prescription of an ACEI; and ARB group, patients with a prescription of an ARB. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates in the no, other, ACEI, and ARB groups were 68.6%, 67.8%, 70.6%, and 69.2%, respectively. The ACEI group had the best patient survival trend among the four groups. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, no differences were observed between the ACEI and ARB groups. Among young patients and patients without diabetes or heart disease, the ACEI group had the best patient survival among the four groups. However, among patients with DM or heart disease, the ARB group had the best patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that patients receiving ACEI and ARB had comparable survival. However, patients receiving ARB had better survival in the subgroups of patients with DM or heart disease, and patients receiving ACEI had better survival in the subgroup of young patients or patients without diabetes or heart disease.

Heart failure pharmacotherapy and cancer: pathways and pre-clinical/clinical evidence.

Heart failure (HF) patients have a significantly higher risk of new-onset cancer and cancer-associated mortality, compared to subjects free of HF. While both the prevention and treatment of new-onset HF in patients with cancer have been investigated extensively, less is known about the prevention and treatment of new-onset cancer in patients with HF, and whether and how guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF should be modified when cancer is diagnosed in HF patients. The purpose of this review is to elaborate and discuss the effects of pillar HF pharmacotherapies, as well as digoxin and diuretics on cancer, and to identify areas for further research and novel therapeutic strategies. To this end, in this review, (i) proposed effects and mechanisms of action of guideline-directed HF drugs on cancer derived from pre-clinical data will be described, (ii) the evidence from both observational studies and randomized controlled trials on the effects of guideline-directed medical therapy on cancer incidence and cancer-related outcomes, as synthetized by meta-analyses will be reviewed, and (iii) considerations for future pre-clinical and clinical investigations will be provided.

Anticancer Potential of ACEIs/ARBs Administration in Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CC) is the fourth most common type of cancer that causes illness and death. Medicines like ACE inhibitors and ARBs, usually used for heart problems, have shown they might help with the growth and development of CC. INTRODUCTION: An analysis of ACE inhibitors and colon cancer is conducted in this comprehensive review. The main goal is to see how ACEIs/ARBs affect the chances of getting cancer and dying in patients with CC. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies that evaluated the use of ACEIs/ARBs in patients with CC and reported outcomes related to new cancer incidence and mortality. Data from selected studies were extracted and analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. RESULTS: The study showed that fewer cancer cases occurred in patients who took ACEIs/ARBs compared to those who did not (RR 0.962, 95% CI 0.934-0.991, p = 0.010). Furthermore, patients with CC who utilized ACEIs/ARBs exhibited a decreased mortality rate compared to non-users (HR 0.833, 95% CI 0.640-1.085, p = 0.175). CONCLUSION: This review suggests that using ACEIs/ARBs medicine could help people with CC live longer and lower their chances of dying. These results highlight the potential benefits of utilizing ACE inhibitors in the management of CC, warranting further investigation and consideration in clinical practice.

Systematic Review Examining the Association Between Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Prescription and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth and Events.

OBJECTIVE: Whether angiotensin II blockade is an effective medical treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has not been established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the association between angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) prescription and AAA growth and events. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from their inception to 4 January 2024, with no language restrictions. REVIEW METHODS: The five databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting the association between ACEi or ARB prescription and AAA growth, repair, or rupture. The primary outcome was AAA growth, with secondary outcomes of AAA rupture, AAA repair, and AAA related events (rupture and repair combined). Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool for RCTs and with a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Random effects models were used for meta-analyses. RESULTS: Eleven studies (two RCTs, eight observational studies, and one meta-analysis of individual patient data from seven populations) involving 58 022 patients were included. ACEi prescription was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in AAA growth (standard mean difference 0.01 mm/year, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.26 - 0.28; p = .93; I2 = 98%) or AAA repair (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% CI 0.50 - 1.09; p = .65; I2 = 61%), but was associated with a statistically significantly lower risk of AAA rupture (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81 - 0.93; p < .001; I2 = 26%) and AAA related events (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 - 0.95; p = .006; I2 = 80%). ARB prescription was not associated with significantly reduced AAA growth or a lower risk of AAA related events. The two RCTs had a low risk of bias, with one observational study having low, seven moderate, and one high risk of bias. All of the findings had a very low certainty of evidence based on the GRADE analysis. CONCLUSION: There was no association between ACEi or ARB prescription and AAA growth, but ACEi prescription was associated with a reduced risk of AAA rupture and AAA related events with very low certainty of evidence.

Angiotensin II-dependent aldosterone production in the adrenal cortex.

The adrenal cortex is responsible for production of adrenal steroid hormones and is anatomically divided into three distinct zones: zona glomerulosa secreting mineralocorticoids (mainly aldosterone), zona fasciculata secreting glucocorticoids (cortisol), and zona reticularis producing androgens. Importantly, due to their high lipophilicity, no adrenal steroid hormone (including aldosterone) is stored in vesicles but rather gets synthesized and secreted instantly upon cell stimulation with specific stimuli. Aldosterone is the most potent mineralocorticoid hormone produced from the adrenal cortex in response to either angiotensin II (AngII) or elevated K+ levels in the blood (hyperkalemia). AngII, being a peptide, cannot cross cell membranes and thus, uses two distinct G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) types, AngII type 1 receptor (AT1R) and AT2R to exert its effects inside cells. In zona glomerulosa cells, AT1R activation by AngII results in aldosterone synthesis and secretion via two main pathways: (a) Gq/11 proteins that activate phospholipase C ultimately raising intracellular free calcium concentration; and (b) ßarrestin1 and -2 (also known as Arrestin-2 and -3, respectively) that elicit sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation. Both pathways induce upregulation and acute activation of StAR (steroidogenic acute regulatory) protein, the enzyme that catalyzes the rate-limiting step in aldosterone biosynthesis. This chapter describes these two salient pathways underlying AT1R-induced aldosterone production in zona glomerulosa cells. We also highlight some pharmacologically important notions pertaining to the efficacy of the currently available AT1R antagonists, also known as angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or sartans at suppressing both pathways, i.e., their inverse agonism efficacy at G proteins and ßarrestins.

Effect of Azilsartan on clinical blood pressure reduction compared to other angiotensin receptor blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Hypertension has significantly contributed to morbidity and mortality, necessitating effective management. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have emerged as a cornerstone in hypertension treatment. Azilsartan, a relatively recent addition to the ARB family, offers unique characteristics, including prodrug activation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate Azilsartan's role in reducing clinical blood pressure compared to other ARBs and determine the most effective dosage. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov. Eligible studies included adult hypertensive patients receiving Azilsartan compared to other ARBs, with clinical systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) outcomes. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and statistical analysis employed comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software. Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials encompassing 18 studies involving 6024 patients were included. Azilsartan demonstrated significant reductions in clinical SBP (mean difference=-2.85 mmHg) and DBP (mean difference=-2.095 mmHg) compared to other ARBs. Higher doses of Azilsartan showed greater efficacy, with 80 mg exhibiting the most substantial reduction in SBP. The analysis emphasized the need for more studies investigating lower Azilsartan doses (10 and 20 mg). Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis underscore Azilsartan's effectiveness in reducing SBP and DBP. Dose-dependent effects emphasize the importance of optimal dosing when prescribing Azilsartan. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians in managing hypertension effectively and call for further research, primarily focusing on lower Azilsartan doses and a more diverse patient population.

Anti-hypertensive effect of a novel angiotensin II receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) -S086 in DSS rat model.

Introduction: Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), comprised of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and a neprilysin inhibitor (NEPi), has established itself as a safe and effective intervention for hypertension. S086 is a novel ARNi cocrystal developed by Salubris for the treatment of heart failure and hypertension. Methods: Dahl Salt Sensitive (DSS) hypertensive rat model and telemetry system were employed in this study to investigate the anti-hypertensive efficacy of S086 and compare it with the first ARNi-LCZ696. Results and discussion: The study showed that oral administration of S086 dose-dependently lowered blood pressure (P < 0.001). The middle dosage of S086 (23 mg/kg) exhibited efficacy comparable to LCZ696 (68 mg/kg), while also demonstrating superiority at specific time points (P < 0.05). Notably, water consumption slightly decreased post-treatment compared to the vehicle group. Furthermore, there were significant increases in natriuresis and diuresis observed on the first day of treatment with 23 mg/kg and 68 mg/kg S086 (P < 0.001). However, over the course of treatment, the effects in all treatment groups gradually diminished. This study demonstrates the anti-hypertensive efficacy of S086 in DSS hypertensive rat model, offering promising avenues for the clinical development of S086 as a hypertension treatment.