Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 43
Filter
1.
Cureus ; 15(11): e49103, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38024022

ABSTRACT

Non-surgical, conservative approaches to foot and ankle conditions are of important consideration. Orthotics play a significant role in treating these conditions, preventing progression, and alleviating pressure on affected areas, thereby promoting normal gait. This article aims to assess the utility and effectiveness of various orthotic treatments in different clinical scenarios. We reviewed 27 peer-reviewed articles using electronic databases, employing keywords such as "orthoses," "orthotic treatment," "arthritis," "neuropathy," and "foot and ankle trauma." Studies conducted in recent decades have explored the effectiveness of orthoses in various conditions, including connective tissue disorders, tendon and ligament injuries, foot arthritis, neuropathic and inflammatory wounds, and sports-related recurrent injuries. Orthotic management has proven effective across diverse foot and ankle conditions. Integrating orthotic treatment with systemic approaches benefits patients with foot and ankle disorders. We believe this review can be utilised by clinicians in the management of foot and ankle disorders.

2.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol ; 11: 1255944, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37901843

ABSTRACT

Objective: Ankle braces can affect the kinematics of the ankle joint during landing tasks. Previous studies were primarily relied on traditional marker-based motion capture systems, which pose limitations in non-invasively capturing the motion of the talus bone. The effect of ankle braces on the in vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints during landing remains unknown. This study used a high-speed dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate effect of ankle braces on the in vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints during landing. Methods: Fourteen healthy participants were recruited for this study. During the experiment, static three-dimensional MRI data were collected for each participant, and 3D ankle joint models for the calcaneus, talus, and tibia were constructed. The DFIS was used to capture the images of each participant performing a single-leg landing-jump task at a height of 40 cm. The images were captured once with and without a brace in the fatigue condition, which was induced by running. The six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) kinematic data were obtained by 2D-3D registration. Results: The flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) (42.73 ± 4.76° vs. 38.74 ± 5.43°, p = 0.049) and anterior-posterior translation ROM (16.86 ± 1.74 mm vs. 15.03 ± 1.73 mm, p = 0.009) of the tibiotalar joint were decreased. The maximum inversion angle (-3.71 ± 2.25° vs. 2.11 ± 1.83°, p = 0.047) of the subtalar joint was decreased. Conclusion: The ankle brace limited the flexion-extension ROM of the tibiotalar joints and the inversion angle of the subtalar joint during landing.

3.
J Foot Ankle Res ; 16(1): 59, 2023 Sep 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37705053

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Functional ankle instability (FAI) is a common condition that affects individuals who have experienced previous ankle sprains. Textured insoles and elastic ankle braces have been previously used as interventions to improve stability in FAI patients. However, the optimal combination of these interventions has not been fully explored. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of different types of textured insoles and elastic ankle braces on the dynamic stability of individuals diagnosed with FAI. METHODS: The study involved 18 FAI patients who performed single-leg landing tasks with and without wearing an eight-band elastic ankle brace while wearing textured insoles with protrusion heights of 0 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm. The dynamic posture stability index (DPSI) and its components in the anterior-posterior (APSI), mediolateral (MLSI) and vertical (VSI) directions were calculated from the ground reaction force collected from the Kistler force plate during the first three seconds of the landing tasks. RESULTS: A significant interaction was found between textured insole type and ankle brace for DPSI (P = 0.026), APSI (P = 0.001), and VSI (P = 0.021). However, no significant interaction was observed for MLSI (P = 0.555). With elastic ankle braces, textured insoles with 1-mm protrusions significantly enhanced anterior-posterior, mediolateral, vertical, and overall stability compared to textured insoles with no and 2 mm protrusions (P < 0.05). Without elastic ankle braces, textured insoles with 1-mm protrusions significantly improved the anterior-posterior (P = 0.012) and overall stability (P = 0.014) of FAI patients compared to smooth insoles. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of textured insoles with 1-mm protrusion heights and an elastic ankle brace could enhance the dynamic stability of individuals with FAI, potentially mitigating the risk of ankle sprains.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries , Joint Instability , Humans , Ankle , Braces , Ankle Joint , Ankle Injuries/prevention & control , Joint Instability/prevention & control
4.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37524673

ABSTRACT

Objective: To study the protective effect of parachute ankle brace on ankle joint during simulated parachuting landing. Methods: In August 2021, 30 male paratroopers were selected as the test subjects by simple random sampling method. They jumped from the 1.5 m and 2.0 m height platforms respectively with and without parachute ankle brace, and landed on the sandy ground in a semi-squat parachute landing position. The experiment was divided into 1.5 m experimental group and control group and 2.0 m experimental group and control group. Angle sensor and surface electromyograph were used to measure and analyze the coronal tilt range of the ankle joint and the percentage of maximal voluntary contraction (MVE%) of the muscles around the ankle joint, respectively, to evaluate the protective effect of the parachute ankle brace. Results: At the same height, the tilt range of coronal plane of ankle in experimental group was significantly reduced compared with control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Under the same protection state, the tilt range of the coronal plane of the ankle in the 1.5 m group was significantly reduced compared with that in the 2.0 m group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The coronal plane inclination range of the ankle in 2 m experimental group was significantly lower than that in 1.5 m control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with 1.5 m control group, MVE% of right tibialis anterior muscle and bilateral lateral gastrocnemius decreased in 1.5 m experimental group, while MVE% of bilateral peroneus longus increased, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Compared with 2.0 m control group, the MVE% of bilateral tibialis anterior muscle and right lateral gastrocnemius decreased in 2.0 m experimental group, while the MVE% of bilateral peroneus longus increased, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The MVE% of bilateral tibialis anterior muscle, bilateral lateral gastrocnemius muscle and right peroneus longus muscle in 1.5 m experimental group decreased compared with 2.0 m experimental group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with 2.0 m control group, the MVE% of bilateral tibialis anterior muscle, right lateral gastrocnemius muscle and right peroneus longus muscle in 1.5 m control group decreased, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05) . Conclusion: Wearing parachute ankle brace can effectively limit the coronal plane inclination range of ankle joint, improve the stability of ankle joint and reduce the load on the muscles around ankle joint by landing. Reducing the height of the jumping platform can reduce the coronal plane incline range of the ankle and the muscle load around the ankle during landing.


Subject(s)
Ankle Joint , Ankle , Humans , Male , Ankle Joint/physiology , Lower Extremity/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Electromyography
5.
Foot Ankle Spec ; : 19386400231184125, 2023 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37415344

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lateral ankle sprains are a common musculoskeletal injury. Ankle braces are frequently used to prevent ankle injuries. AIM: The purpose of this study was to examine the anterior translation of the talocrural joint of 2 ankle braces relative to a control. METHODS: Ankle mobility was assessed with the Mobil-Aider arthrometer in 3 conditions: TayCo ankle brace, Aircast ankle brace, and control. Three measures were recorded for each condition. RESULTS: Thirty participants (9 male and 21 female patients) participated. Friedman's analysis of variance found significant between-group differences for the trial with the largest translation. Wilcoxon signed-ranks post hoc testing found significant between-group differences between the control and TayCo (P < .001) and the control and Aircast conditions (P < .001). Post hoc power analysis revealed a Kendall's W of 0.804. CLINICAL APPLICATION: The TayCo brace is unique in that it is worn on the outside of the athletic shoe, whereas the Aircast is composed of lateral constraints worn inside the shoe. Both braces provided significant constraint over anterior talus translation when compared to control. The TayCo brace (51%-52% of control) was also significantly better than the Aircast (58%-59% of control) with less anterior translation permitted. This may be instrumental in preventing ankle injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.

6.
Foot Ankle Clin ; 28(1): 145-154, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36822684

ABSTRACT

Ankle braces are commonly recommended for prevention of ankle sprains, especially secondary sprains, rehabilitation, and return to normal activity or sport after injury. One common resistance to use is the feeling that braces will impede functional performance. For people with chronic ankle instability, the limited research indicates that the use of semirigid, lace-up, or soft-shell braces will not affect, and in some cases, may enhance performance. Activities that could be enhanced are jumping, hopping, and dynamic balance.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries , Joint Instability , Sprains and Strains , Humans , Ankle , Ankle Joint , Braces
7.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-986059

ABSTRACT

Objective: To study the protective effect of parachute ankle brace on ankle joint during simulated parachuting landing. Methods: In August 2021, 30 male paratroopers were selected as the test subjects by simple random sampling method. They jumped from the 1.5 m and 2.0 m height platforms respectively with and without parachute ankle brace, and landed on the sandy ground in a semi-squat parachute landing position. The experiment was divided into 1.5 m experimental group and control group and 2.0 m experimental group and control group. Angle sensor and surface electromyograph were used to measure and analyze the coronal tilt range of the ankle joint and the percentage of maximal voluntary contraction (MVE%) of the muscles around the ankle joint, respectively, to evaluate the protective effect of the parachute ankle brace. Results: At the same height, the tilt range of coronal plane of ankle in experimental group was significantly reduced compared with control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Under the same protection state, the tilt range of the coronal plane of the ankle in the 1.5 m group was significantly reduced compared with that in the 2.0 m group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The coronal plane inclination range of the ankle in 2 m experimental group was significantly lower than that in 1.5 m control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with 1.5 m control group, MVE% of right tibialis anterior muscle and bilateral lateral gastrocnemius decreased in 1.5 m experimental group, while MVE% of bilateral peroneus longus increased, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Compared with 2.0 m control group, the MVE% of bilateral tibialis anterior muscle and right lateral gastrocnemius decreased in 2.0 m experimental group, while the MVE% of bilateral peroneus longus increased, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The MVE% of bilateral tibialis anterior muscle, bilateral lateral gastrocnemius muscle and right peroneus longus muscle in 1.5 m experimental group decreased compared with 2.0 m experimental group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with 2.0 m control group, the MVE% of bilateral tibialis anterior muscle, right lateral gastrocnemius muscle and right peroneus longus muscle in 1.5 m control group decreased, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05) . Conclusion: Wearing parachute ankle brace can effectively limit the coronal plane inclination range of ankle joint, improve the stability of ankle joint and reduce the load on the muscles around ankle joint by landing. Reducing the height of the jumping platform can reduce the coronal plane incline range of the ankle and the muscle load around the ankle during landing.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Ankle , Ankle Joint/physiology , Lower Extremity/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Electromyography
8.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil ; 14(1): 88, 2022 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35578347

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ankle orthotics decreases the maximal vertical jump height. It is essential to maximize jump height and minimize ground contact time during athletic performance. However, the effect of ankle orthotics on athletic performance has not been reported. We aimed to investigate the effect of ankle orthotics on squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), and repetitive rebound jump (RJ) performance. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers performed SJ, CMJ, repetitive RJ under no-orthosis and two orthotic conditions (orthosis 1 and orthosis 2). During SJ and CMJ, we measured the vertical ground reaction force and calculated the following parameters: jump height, peak vertical ground reaction force, rate of force development, net vertical impulse, and peak power. During repetitive RJ, the jump height, contact time, and RJ index were measured. A two-dimensional motion analysis was used to quantify the ankle range of motion in the sagittal plane during SJ, CMJ, and repetitive RJ. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of variance and the post hoc test showed orthosis 2 significantly decreased in the vertical jump height (p = 0.003), peak power (p = 0.007), and maximum plantarflexion and dorsiflexion angles (p < 0.001) during SJ Ankle orthoses 1 and 2 did not influence to the RJ performance compared to those using the no-orthosis condition. Additionally, orthosis 2 significantly decreased the jump height at the end of repetitive RJ (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ankle orthosis do not affect average RJ performance but should be considered when performing repetitive jumps frequently.

9.
J Sci Med Sport ; 25(7): 615-630, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35337727

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the literature on the effects of ankle supports on lower extremity biomechanics during functional tasks. DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS: Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to July 2019. Studies of biomechanical outcomes during functional tasks that used a within-participant (repeated measures) design were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, assessed the methodological quality of the included studies and rated the quality of evidence. Meta-analysis was performed and reported as standardised mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 8350 studies were identified in the electronic search and 42 studies involving a total of 761 participants were included in the review (21 studies included for qualitative reporting and 21 studies in the meta-analysis). Most individual studies and the meta-analyses demonstrated no effect of ankle supports on ground reaction force or ankle inversion angle. However, there was high quality evidence that ankle taping decreased plantarflexion angle at initial contact during landing from a height (P = 0.0009, standerdised mean differences = 0.72, 95% confidence intervals = 1.15, 0.03, I 2 = 3%). The effect of ankle supports on transverse plane ankle biomechanics has not been adequately investigated. CONCLUSIONS: Ankle taping only decreased plantarflexion angle at initial contact during landing from a jump. Ankle supports did not affect inversion angle or forces in linear and multiplanar tasks. There was insufficient evidence on the effect of ankle supports on ankle transverse plane biomechanics.


Subject(s)
Ankle Joint , Ankle , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Lower Extremity
10.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 19(2): 113-122, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35130797

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ankle sprains are common injuries within the civilian and military populations, with lingering symptoms that include pain, swelling, giving-way, and a high likelihood for recurrence. Numerous bracing systems are available to stabilize the ankle joint following sprains, with new design iterations frequently entering the market. Currently available braces generally include sleeve, lace-up, and stirrup designs. Sleeves provide mild compression and warmth but limited stability for the ankle, while lace-ups and stirrups appear to be more effective at preventing and treating lateral ankle sprains. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the use of various brace options in practice. Their major clinical benefits, and limitations are highlighted, followed by an overview of emerging concepts in brace design. Current advancements in biomechanical simulation, multifunctional material fabrication, and wearable, field-deployed devices for human injury surveillance are discussed, providing possibilities for conceiving new design concepts for next-generation smart ankle braces. EXPERT OPINION: Performance of the commercially available braces are limited by their current design concepts. Suggestions on future brace design include: (1) incorporating high-performance materials suitable for extreme environments, (2) leveraging modeling and simulation techniques to predict mechanical support requirements, and (3) implementing adaptive, customizable componentry material to meet the needs of each unique patient.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries , Military Personnel , Sprains and Strains , Ankle Injuries/prevention & control , Ankle Joint , Braces , Humans
11.
Bioengineering (Basel) ; 10(1)2022 Dec 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36671606

ABSTRACT

Ankle sprain is the most common injury during parachute landing. The biomechanical behavior of the tissues can help us understand the injury mechanism of ankle inversion. To accurately describe the injury mechanism of tissues and assess the effect of ankle protection, a stable time of landing was obtained through the dynamic stability test. It was used for the boundary condition of the foot finite element (FE). The FE model was provided a static load equal to half of the bodyweight applied at the distal tibia and fibula; a foot-boot-brace FE model was established to simulate the landing of subjects on an inversion inclined platform of 0-20°, including non-, external, and elastic ankle braces. Compared with the non-ankle brace, both the external and elastic ankle braces decreased the peak strains of the cal-fibular, anterior Ta-fibular, and posterior Ta-fibular ligaments (15.2-33.0%), and of the peak stress of the fibula (15.2-24.5%). For the strain decrement of the aforementioned ligaments, the elastic brace performed better than the external ankle brace under the inversion of the 10° condition. The peak stress of the fibula (15.6 MPa) decreased up to 24.5% with an elastic brace and 5.6-10.3% with an external brace. The findings suggested that the behaviors of lateral ankle ligaments and fibula were meaningful for the functional ability of the ankle. This provides some suggestions regarding the optimal design of ankle protection.

12.
Journal of Medical Biomechanics ; (6): E361-E368, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-961737

ABSTRACT

Objective To examine the effects of ankle brace on biomechanics of the lower extremity during landing, so as to provide a theoretic support to choose ankle brace for people with different sports levels. Methods The key words (ankle brace OR ankle braces OR ankle bracing OR ankle support) AND (landing OR land OR jump OR hopped OR hopping) AND (biomechanics OR kinematics OR kinetics OR electromyography OR neuromuscular) in Chinese and English were searched from different electronic databases (CNKI, Web of Science, EBSCO, PubMed and other databases), for a period of Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2020. Cochrane was used to evaluate the quality of eligible studies. For meta analysis, subgroup analysis was used to assess the impact of ankle braces on ankle biomechanics.Results Thirteen studies with a total of 222 participants were included for mata analysis in this study. The semi-rigid ankle brace reduced the peak of ankle inversion by 25.8% compared with the elastic ankle brace (SMD=-0.562, P<0.001). Moreover, the elastic ankle brace reduced ankle plant flexion during landing among athletes (SMD=-3.42, P=-0.021). As for collagiate students, both elastic ankle and semi-rigid ankle decreased the ankle inversion (elastic ankle brace: 35.4%, SMD=-1.000, P=-0.013; semi-rigid ankle brace: 31.11%, SMD=-0.881, P<0.001) and ankle plant flexion (elastic ankle brace:23.30%, SMD=-1.381, P<0.001;semi-rigid ankle brace: 36.33%, SMD=-1.605, P<0.001).Conclusions Both ankle braces can prevent ankle sprain for athletes (basketball, volleyball, running) who experience training more than 5 years. The elastic ankle brace can limit the inversion and plantar flexion, while the semi-rigid ankle brace can merely decrease the ankle inversion. Therefore, athletes are more suitable for the elastic ankle brace. As for collegiate students without training history, both ankle brace can decrease the ankle inversion and plantar flexion. The elastic ankle brace has greater restriction on inversion, while the semi-rigid ankle brace has more restriction on plantar flexion. Therefore, the elastic ankle brace should be utilized if collegiate students have calcaneofibular ligament injury, while the semi-rigid ankle brace is more suitable for collegiate students who have a history of anterior talofibular ligament injury.

13.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol ; 9: 790595, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34957079

ABSTRACT

Half-squat parachuting landing is a kind of activity with high impact force. Injuries on lower-extremity joints are common in half-squat parachuting landing and would be increased with a backpack. An ankle brace was used to prevent ankle injuries in landing. However, few quantitative studies reported about the protection of an ankle brace for lower-extremity joints in half-squat parachuting landing with a backpack. This study focused on evaluating the protective effects of an ankle brace in half-squat parachuting landing with a backpack. Seven male participants landed from 120 cm with a backpack and an ankle brace. Each participant performed three landing trials on every experimental condition. Kinetics and kinematics of the hip, knee, and ankle were analyzed. It was found that the ankle brace did not significantly affect the ground reaction force with backpack but increased the ground reaction force from 14.7 ± 2.0 bodyweight to 16.2 ± 1.9 bodyweight (p = 0.017) without the backpack. The ankle brace significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the angular displacement, angular velocity, and angular acceleration of the ankle both without and with the backpack. In conclusion, the ankle brace could restrict ankle motion and significantly increase ground reaction force without the backpack. However, the ankle brace did not significantly influence ground reaction force and still restricted ankle motion with the backpack. Therefore, the ankle brace was more effective in half-squat parachuting landing with the backpack than no-backpack landing.

14.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 16(1): 620, 2021 Oct 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34663386

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Novel imaging technologies like 3D stress-MRI of the ankle allow a quantification of the mechanical instability contributing to chronic ankle instability. In the present study, we have tested the efficacy of a semirigid ankle brace on joint congruency in a plantarflexion/supination position with and without load. METHODS: In this controlled observational study of n = 25 patients suffering from mechanical ankle instability, a custom-built ankle arthrometer implementing a novel 3D-stress MRI technique was used to evaluate the stabilizing effect of an ankle brace. Three parameters of joint congruency (i.e., 3D cartilage contact area fibulotalar, tibiotalar horizontal and tibiotalar vertical) were measured. The loss of cartilage contact area from neutral position to a position combined of 40° of plantarflexion and 30° of supination without and with axial load of 200 N was calculated. A semirigid ankle brace was applied in plantarflexion/supination to evaluate its effect on joint congruence. Furthermore, the perceived stability of the brace during a hopping task was analyzed using visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: The application of a semirigid brace led to an increase in cartilage contact area (CCA) when the foot was placed in plantarflexion and supination. This effect was visible for all three compartments of the upper ankle joint (P < 0.001; η2 = 0.54). The effect of axial loading did not result in significant differences. The subjective stability provided by the brace (VAS 7.6/10) did not correlate to the magnitude of the improvement of the overall joint congruency. CONCLUSIONS: The stabilizing effect of the semirigid ankle brace can be verified using 3D stress-MRI. Providing better joint congruency with an ankle brace may reduce peak loads at certain areas of the talus, which possibly cause osteochondral or degenerative lesions. However, the perceived stability provided by the brace does not seem to reflect into the mechanical effect of the brace. Trial registration The study protocol was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (#DRKS00016356).


Subject(s)
Ankle Joint , Joint Instability , Ankle , Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Joint Instability/therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging
15.
Gait Posture ; 87: 149-155, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933933

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) have an increased risk for recurrent injuries. The preventive effects of external ankle supports are not fully understood. This study aimed to examine the effect of elastic ankle support on running ankle kinematics. METHODS: 3D running gait analysis of individuals with and without CAI was conducted at three-minute-running trials at 2.78 m/s with and without elastic ankle support in a randomised order. Ankle kinematics and intra-individual standard deviations (variability) were calculated at each percent of the running gait cycle. Group and ankle support effects were calculated using statistical parameter mapping. RESULTS: Twenty-seven individuals were analysed (CAI: n = 14, controls: n = 13). When wearing ankle support, CAI individuals showed significantly decreased plantarflexion angles at 43-47 % (p = 0.033) and 49-51 % (p = 0.043) of the running gait cycle compared to normal running. In healthy controls, no differences in ankle angles between both conditions were found. Comparisons between CAI individuals and healthy controls showed statistically significant differences in the plantar-/dorsiflexion angles at 38-41 % (p = 0.044) with ankle support and at 34-46 % (p = 0.004) without ankle support. Significant ankle angle variability differences were found for ankle in-/eversion between CAI individuals and healthy controls (p = 0.041) at 32-33 % of the running gait cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Elastic ankle support reduces the range of sagittal plane running ankle kinematics of CAI individuals but not of healthy controls. Further research is needed to evaluate the association between ankle support effects and the risk for recurrent ankle sprains.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries , Ankle , Joint Instability , Ankle Joint , Biomechanical Phenomena , Chronic Disease , Humans
16.
J Athl Train ; 56(5): 461-472, 2021 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34000019

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Arch height is one important aspect of foot posture. An estimated 20% of the population has pes planus and 20% has pes cavus. These abnormal foot postures can alter lower extremity kinematics and plantar loading and contribute to injury risk. Ankle bracing is commonly used in sport to prevent these injuries, but no researchers have examined the effects of ankle bracing on plantar loading. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of ankle braces on plantar loading during athletic tasks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 36 participants (11 men, 25 women; age = 23.1 ± 2.5 years, height = 1.72 ± 0.09 m, mass = 66.3 ± 14.7 kg) were recruited for this study. INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed walking, running, and cutting tasks in 3 bracing conditions: no brace, lace-up ankle-support brace, and semirigid brace. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We analyzed the plantar-loading variables of contact area, maximum force, and force-time integral for 2 midfoot and 3 forefoot regions and assessed the displacement of the center of pressure. A 3 × 3 mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine the effects of brace and foot type (α = .05). RESULTS: Foot type affected force measures in the middle (P range = .003-.047) and the medial side of the foot (P range = .004-.04) in all tasks. Brace type affected contact area in the medial midfoot during walking (P = .005) and cutting (P = .01) tasks, maximum force in the medial and lateral midfoot during all tasks (P < .001), and force-time integral in the medial midfoot during all tasks (P < .001). Portions of the center-of-pressure displacement were affected by brace wear in both the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions (P range = .001-.049). CONCLUSIONS: Ankle braces can be worn to redistribute plantar loading. Additional research should be done to evaluate their effectiveness in injury prevention.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries , Braces , Flatfoot , Plantar Plate/physiology , Talipes Cavus , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Ankle/physiology , Ankle Injuries/etiology , Ankle Injuries/physiopathology , Ankle Injuries/prevention & control , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Flatfoot/complications , Flatfoot/diagnosis , Flatfoot/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Running/physiology , Talipes Cavus/complications , Talipes Cavus/diagnosis , Talipes Cavus/physiopathology , Walking/physiology , Young Adult
17.
J Foot Ankle Res ; 14(1): 13, 2021 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33596976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The application of ankle braces is an effective method for the prevention of recurrent ankle sprains. It has been proposed that the reduction of injury rates is based on the mechanical stiffness of the brace and on beneficial effects on proprioception and neuromuscular activation. Yet, how the neuromuscular system responds to the application of various types of ankle braces during highly dynamic injury-relevant movements is not well understood. Enhanced stability of the ankle joint seems especially important for people with chronic ankle instability. We therefore aimed to analyse the effects of a soft and a semi-rigid ankle brace on the execution of highly dynamic 180° turning movements in participants with and without chronic ankle instability. METHODS: Fifteen participants with functional ankle instability, 15 participants with functional and mechanical ankle instability and 15 healthy controls performed 180° turning movements in reaction to light signals in a cross-sectional descriptive laboratory study. Ankle joint kinematics and kinetics as well as neuromuscular activation of muscles surrounding the ankle joint were determined. Two-way repeated measures analyses of variance and post-hoc t-tests were calculated. RESULTS: Maximum ankle inversion angles and velocities were significantly reduced with the semi-rigid brace in comparison to the conditions without a brace and with the soft brace (p ≤ 0.006, d ≥ 0.303). Effect sizes of these reductions were larger in participants with chronic ankle instability than in healthy controls. Furthermore, peroneal activation levels decreased significantly with the semi-rigid brace in the 100 ms before and after ground contact. No statistically significant brace by group effects were found. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, we argue that people with ankle instability in particular seem to benefit from a semi-rigid ankle brace, which allows them to keep ankle inversion angles in a range that is comparable to values of healthy people. Lower ankle inversion angles and velocities with a semi-rigid brace may explain reduced injury incidences with brace application. The lack of effect of the soft brace indicates that the primary mechanism behind the reduction of inversion angles and velocities is the mechanical resistance of the brace in the frontal plane.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries/prevention & control , Braces , Equipment Design , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Joint Instability/rehabilitation , Adult , Ankle Injuries/etiology , Ankle Joint/physiopathology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Chronic Disease , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Joint Instability/complications , Male , Movement , Proprioception , Range of Motion, Articular , Young Adult
18.
Cureus ; 12(9): e10265, 2020 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33042703

ABSTRACT

Ankle sprains and fractures represent the most common cause of parachuting-related injury sustained during landing. Various factors increase risk of injury, including increased combat loads, poor weather conditions, entanglements, and night jumps. The introduction of ankle braces has decreased the incidence of ankle injuries among parachuters. Ankle radiographs are the most frequent imaging modality acquired in the initial evaluation of ankle injuries. Providers are often unfamiliar with radiographic ankle fracture patterns. We present radiographic images of 10 patients who sustained landing-related osseous fractures during the Basic Airborne Course at Fort Benning, Georgia. Understanding the frequent radiographic fracture patterns sustained during landing can help primary care providers, orthopedists, and radiologists in the initial assessment of ankle injuries in populations with high airborne operational activity and recreational parachuting.

19.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 59(4): 711-715, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31954599

ABSTRACT

This cadaveric study investigated the biomechanical characteristics and stabilizing contribution of the bifurcate ligament using a multidirectional loading method and assessed the stabilizing effect of a brace after injury of the ligament. Eight freshly frozen cadaveric feet were tested for forefoot torque in inversion, eversion, adduction, and plantarflexion. Each band of the bifurcate ligament was transected sequentially, and the contribution of each portion of the ligament, as well as the stabilizing effects of the ankle brace, were examined. Stability decreased substantially after calcaneocuboid ligament transection for inversion and adduction loading. Bracing restored some stability, except for the adduction loading direction, for which it had only limited effect. The data indicate that inversion and adduction loading are strongly related to bifurcate ligament injury. The stabilizing effect of the ankle brace may have limited effectiveness for loads under adduction.


Subject(s)
Ankle Joint , Ankle , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Humans , Range of Motion, Articular
20.
Gait Posture ; 72: 228-233, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31271970

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As in vivo tibiotalar and subtalar joint kinematics are not currently known following the application of an ankle brace, an investigation of these kinematics may provide insight into the mechanisms of ankle braces. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aimed to determine the effect of an ankle brace on in vivo kinematics of patients with chronic ankle instability. METHODS: Eleven patients with chronic ankle instability were recruited in this study. A dual fluoroscopic imaging system and a solid modeling software were utilized to calculate the joint positions of the participants as they walked barefooted on a level platform, walked barefooted on a 15° inversion platform, and walked with an ankle brace on a 15° inversion platform. The joint positions during the three walking conditions were compared. RESULTS: Tibiotalar joints were more inverted (pose 2, p = .004), and subtalar joints were more anteriorly translated (pose 2-6, p = .003), more plantarflexed (pose 2, p = .008; pose 3, p = .013; pose 5, p = .008; pose 6, p = .016) and more inverted (pose 1-5, p = .003; pose 6, p = .013) during barefooted walking on the inversion platform than during walking on the level platform. The inversion of subtalar joints was decreased after the brace application (pose 2-4, p = .003; pose 5, p = .004; pose 7, p = .016). SIGNIFICANCE: Brace application reduced the increased subtalar inversion induced by the inversion platform. Nevertheless, increased subtalar anterior translation and plantarflexion persisted after brace application. The ankle brace might be beneficial for clinical populations with increased subtalar inversion.


Subject(s)
Ankle Joint , Braces , Joint Instability/therapy , Walking , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Joint Instability/rehabilitation , Male , Range of Motion, Articular , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...