Clinical Significance of Antibodies to DFS70 in Immunoinflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.

The relevance of the problem of immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IIRD) for modern medicine is determined by their high prevalence in the population, the difficulty of early diagnosis, the rapid development of disability and poor life prognosis. Recent data on the significance of anti-DFS70 have opened up new possibilities for optimizing the step-by-step diagnosis of IIRD. The detection of these antibodies can help in the interpretation of a positive result for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (IIFA-HEp-2) in the absence of autoantibodies specific for IIRD. Detection of anti-DFS70 in antinuclear factor (ANF) seropositive patients without clinical and/or serological markers characteristic of a certain disease from the IIRD group can be considered as a potential marker that excludes this group of diseases.

Dense fine speckled nuclear immunofluorescence: A mildly reassuring antinuclear antibody pattern meriting consideration.

INTRODUCTION: Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are regarded as a hallmark of connective tissue diseases (CTDs) and play a key role in their diagnosis, but the value of some particular antibodies in management of patients and the disease prognosis is controversial. The mechanism underlying the production of ANAs in CTDs, other chronic inflammatory conditions and even in healthy people, is not completely elucidated. Anti-DFS70 antibodies connected with the dense fine speckled autoantigen of 70 kD, known as the lens epithelium-derived growth factor p75, are a subgroup of ANAs. Their presence and coexistence with other antibodies and their clinical significance are the matter of debate. METHODS: Based on literature data, the authors focused on current knowledge explaining the role of anti-DFS70 antibodies in selected CTDs. RESULTS: However, the literature data is ambiguous and does not fully support the validity of the anti-DFS70 assay for a specific CTD diagnosis. Most researchers claim that the presence of anti-DFS70 as the only one usually exclude the diagnosis of CTD. Nevertheless, its coexistence with other ANAs is not an excluding factor but has predictive value due to more favorable course of CTD. Such situations may also suggest an enhanced risk of the development of a CTD in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Although more studies are needed in this field, it seems reasonable to ascertain the presence of anti-DFS70 in routine clinical practice.

The significance of dense fine speckled pattern in antinuclear antibody-associated rheumatic disease and coexisting autoantibodies: A propensity score-matched cohort study.

AIM: To investigate the relationship between the prevalence of antinuclear antibody (ANA) -associated rheumatic diseases (AARD) and the presence of dense fine speckled (DFS) and homogeneous patterns in ANA tests. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled adult patients with either a DFS or homogeneous pattern in their ANA test. A mixed pattern was defined as the presence of more than one pattern reported in the test. The presence of anti-DFS70 antibodies and other common autoantibodies were detected using EUROLINE ANA Profile 23. A 1:2 propensity score matching was applied to control for demographic and other interfering factors. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients with a DFS pattern were enrolled and compared with a matched homogeneous group. The DFS group had a significantly lower prevalence of AARD (3.4% vs. 16.9%, p = .008) and the subgroup with anti-DFS70 antibodies showed an even lower prevalence (2% vs. 20%, p = .002). Among the 33 patients with monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies, five had a mixed pattern, and all patients with common autoantibodies had an isolated DFS pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that patients with a DFS pattern in their ANA test may have a lower prevalence of AARD compared with those with a homogeneous pattern. However, an isolated DFS pattern in ANA testing does not necessarily indicate the presence of monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies or AARD. Confirmatory testing for the monospecific anti-DFS70 antibody is mandatory to exclude AARD.

An Investigation of the Relationship Between Isolated Anti-dense Fine-Speckled 70 Autoantibodies and Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E.

Background Although the mechanisms of the formation of anti-dense fine-speckled 70 (anti-DFS70) antibodies are not fully known, there is evidence in the literature that allergic reactions may play a role in their formation. Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated immunopathological mechanisms are increasingly being elucidated in diseases such as atopic dermatitis and urticaria-related diseases. We aimed to reveal its relationship with anti-DFS70 in allergen-sensitive patients with positive specific IgE (sIgE) levels. Methodology The study included samples of 758 patients who underwent antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening and allergen-sIgE testing between January 2019 and January 2022. Patients' clinical diagnoses were retrospectively obtained from the hospital information management system. ANA was tested according to the instructions of the manufacturer by the indirect immunofluorescent antibody method using HEp-2 cell substrates (Euroimmun Luebeck, Germany). Allergen-sIgE was determined by chemiluminescence on the Immulite 2000 XPI system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH, Marburg, Germany) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Results ANA pattern was detected in 74 samples included in the study. ANA-positive patients were divided into DFS70 (+) and DFS70 (-) groups. A statistically significant increase in the DFS70 pattern was observed in patients with a positive allergen-sIgE test (p < 0.0001). Both allergen-sIgE and DFS70 positivity were statistically significant in younger age groups (p < 0.05). The most common diagnosis was urticaria-related conditions in 23 (31%) patients with a positive allergy test. Conclusions Our study shows that the positivity of the DFS70 pattern is increased in allergen-sensitive patients. Therefore, the allergen-sIgE-mediated allergic disease should be considered in patients with isolated anti-DSF70. Studies with related disease groups are needed to determine whether there is a relationship between anti-DFS70 and allergy-related disease in these patients. If an immunopathological mechanism is not found, these false-positive results can be considered clinically insignificant, and unnecessary consultations can be avoided.

Investigation of dense fine speckled pattern and anti-dense fine speckled 70 antibody by a single step assay.

The indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method is the gold standard for identifying anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs). It is recommended that ANA, including the dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern, should be verified with a highly specific confirmatory test after a sensitive screening test. Although methods such as ELISA and LIA are often used to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 antibodies, new IIF methods have been developed in recent years to prevent the difficulties in the recognition of the DFS pattern and to carry out the confirmatory test in a single step. In this study, we evaluated CytoBead (Generic Assays, Germany) test, which contained both HEp-2 cell substrate and beads coated with DFS70 antigen in one well, in comparison to the routine two-step test strategy. Five hundred forty-one samples were studied by conventional IIF assay, LIA, and CytoBead assay; 264 samples were studied by ELISA. The Bead component of the CytoBead test was found to be reliable as a confirmational test when compared with ELISA and LIA (total agreement values were 85.6% and 87.6%, respectively). The CytoBead ANA DFS70 might be a promising test in the future, allowing both screening and confirmation in a single step, saving time and being easier than two-step testing.

Anti-DFS70 antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: Prevalence in a large Chinese cohort and an unexpected association with anti-dsDNA antibodies by a long-term follow-up.

Objective: Monospecific autoantibodies to dense fine speckles 70 (DFS70) antigen are purported to aid in excluding systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the non-isolated anti-DFS70 still has a certain prevalence in SLE patients, and the clinical significance remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the prevalence, clinical relevance, and value of long-term monitoring of anti-DFS70 antibodies in SLE patients. Methods: Anti-DFS70 antibodies were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 851 SLE patients, 211 healthy individuals, and 194 patients with other SARD (except SLE). Demographic, serological, and clinical associations of anti-DFS70 antibodies were analyzed by a stepwise multivariable logistic regression model. The correlation of anti-DFS70 with anti-dsDNA, anti-C1q, and SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) was analyzed. Sixty-one SLE patients with follow-up time ranging from 2 to 57 months were measured anti-DFS70 antibodies using both ELISA and line immunoassay. The dynamic variations of anti-DFS70 antibodies were evaluated with anti-dsDNA, anti-C1q, and SLEDAI-2K during the follow-up. Results: The prevalence of anti-DFS70 was significantly higher in SLE (20.7% (176/851)) than in healthy individuals (9.5% (20/211), p = 0.0002) and other SARD (10.8% (21/194), p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis revealed that anti-DFS70-positive SLE patients were associated with younger age (odds ratio (OR) = 0.982; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.969, 0.995), higher frequencies of anti-dsDNA (OR 1.598; 95% CI 1.107, 2.306) and anti-PCNA (OR 6.101; 95% CI 2.534, 14.688), and higher levels of serum IgG (OR 1.097; 95% CI 1.067, 1.129) and were more likely to be accompanied by mucosal ulcers (OR 5.921; 95% CI 1.652, 21.215). The O.D. value of anti-DFS70 positively correlated with levels of anti-dsDNA (r = 0.183, p < 0.0001) and anti-C1q (r = 0.181, p < 0.0001), respectively, but not with SLEDAI-2K (p = 0.920). During the follow-up, 49 (42 negative and 7 positive) patients remained stable with anti-DFS70 levels. The other 12 patients experienced significant changes in anti-DFS70, and 83.3% (10/12) of them showed similar trends between anti-DFS70 and anti-dsDNA by evaluation of dynamic variations. Conclusion: Anti-DFS70 antibodies seem to be prevalent in Chinese SLE patients. The positive association of anti-DFS70 with anti-dsDNA and consistent dynamic variation between anti-DFS70 and anti-dsDNA during the follow-up suggested a potential relationship between anti-DFS70 and anti-dsDNA in patients with SLE.

Anti-DFS70 Antibodies Are Associated With Proliferative Lupus Nephritis and Renal Pathological Activity.

Objective: The significance of anti-dense fine speckles 70 (DFS70) antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is still unclear, especially in lupus nephritis (LN) patients. We investigated the prevalence, clinical and pathological relevance of anti-DFS70 antibodies in LN patients. Methods: Anti-DFS70 antibodies were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in 377 biopsy-proven LN patients, 268 non-LN SLE patients, 232 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, and 78 healthy individuals (HI). Demographic, clinical, and pathological parameters were compared between LN patients with and without anti-DFS70 antibodies. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify covariates associated with anti-DFS70 antibodies. Results: The prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in LN (19.6%) was comparable to non-LN SLE patients (19.8%, P=0.9630), but was significantly higher than CKD patients (13.4%, P=0.0468) and HI (9.0%, P=0.0252). Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, the titer of anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies (adjusted odds ratio=1.002, 95% confidence interval 1.001-1.003, P=0.004) was associated with positive anti-DFS70 antibodies in LN patients. In addition, anti-DFS70 antibodies were more prevalent in proliferative LN (22.0%, 68/309) compared to membrane LN patients (10.2%, 6/59, P=0.0376). Furthermore, LN patients with positive anti-DFS70 antibodies had significantly higher activity index (AI) compared to patients who were negative (8.0 vs 6.0, P=0.0131). However, the chronicity index was similar between the groups (3.0 vs 3.0, P=0.8412). Conclusion: Anti-DFS70 antibodies were not associated with LN development in SLE patients but were associated with anti-dsDNA antibodies, proliferative LN, and renal AI. This suggests their potential to serve as a non-histological biomarker for LN subclass and activity status.

Clinical utility of anti-DFS70 for identifying antinuclear antibody-positive patients without systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease.

INTRODUCTION: The antinuclear antibody (ANA) test is a screening test for systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD). We hypothesised that the presence of anti-DFS70 in ANA-positive samples was associated with a false-positive ANA test and negatively associated with SARD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patient samples received for ANA testing from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2016 was performed. Patient samples underwent ANA testing via indirect immunofluorescence method and anti-DFS70 testing using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Among a total of 645 ANA-positive samples, the majority (41.7%) were positive at a titre of 1:80. The commonest nuclear staining pattern (65.5%) was speckled. Only 9.5% of ANA-positive patients were diagnosed with SARD. Anti-DFS70 was found to be present in 10.0% of ANA-positive patients. The majority (51/59, 86.4%) of patients did not have SARD. Seven patients had positive ANA titre > 1:640, the presence of anti-double stranded DNA and/or anti-Ro60. The presence of anti-DFS70 in ANA-positive patients was not associated with the absence of SARD (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.245). CONCLUSION: The presence of anti-DFS70 was associated with a false-positive ANA test in 8.6% of our patients. Anti-DFS70 was not associated with the absence of SARD.

Anti-dense fine speckled (DFS) antibody: its staining pattern in indirect immunofluorescence and its clinical relevance.

Background: Dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern is defined by very intense, heterogeneous speckled staining of nucleoplasms of interphase HEp-2 cells and chromosomal areas of metaphase cells. The association of Anti-DFS70 and rheumatologic signs, symptoms, and diagnosis were evaluated.Methods: One-hundred-eight anti-DFS70 positives who got consecutively admitted to the Rheumatology clinic between January and June 2020 were analyzed. The clinical and laboratory findings of positives for anti-DFS70 antibody were compared with those with DFS pattern ANA IFA staining rates. Also, anti-DFS70 positivity rates and their correlation with the DFS staining pattern were analyzed retrospectively in 1016 CTD patients.Results: The most common complaint was joint pain seen in 77 (71.3%) and the most common laboratory abnormality was RF-positivity observed in 10/108 (9.3%) who had anti-DFS70 positivity. The most common ANA staining pattern was DFS (72/108; 66.7%); one-third had other than DFS. No statistical significance was found for the association of any of the rheumatological complaints and laboratory findings with the DFS staining pattern. ANA analysis was performed in a total of 964/1016 (94.88%) CTD patients and 44 (4.56%) of these positive for anti-DFS70. The correlation coefficient showed good correlations between the DFS pattern staining and anti-DFS70 antibody positivity (r=+0.773, p<0.001).Conclusions: Anti-DFS70-positives have a low rate of CTD. A low anti-DFS70 positivity rate was observed in patients with CTD. As such, it can be considered that anti-DFS70 does not predict CTD or even excludes it.

Clinical utility of anti-DFS70 for identifying antinuclear antibody-positive patients without systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease

INTRODUCTION@#The antinuclear antibody (ANA) test is a screening test for systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD). We hypothesised that the presence of anti-DFS70 in ANA-positive samples was associated with a false-positive ANA test and negatively associated with SARD.@*METHODS@#A retrospective analysis of patient samples received for ANA testing from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2016 was performed. Patient samples underwent ANA testing via indirect immunofluorescence method and anti-DFS70 testing using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.@*RESULTS@#Among a total of 645 ANA-positive samples, the majority (41.7%) were positive at a titre of 1:80. The commonest nuclear staining pattern (65.5%) was speckled. Only 9.5% of ANA-positive patients were diagnosed with SARD. Anti-DFS70 was found to be present in 10.0% of ANA-positive patients. The majority (51/59, 86.4%) of patients did not have SARD. Seven patients had positive ANA titre > 1:640, the presence of anti-double stranded DNA and/or anti-Ro60. The presence of anti-DFS70 in ANA-positive patients was not associated with the absence of SARD (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.245).@*CONCLUSION@#The presence of anti-DFS70 was associated with a false-positive ANA test in 8.6% of our patients. Anti-DFS70 was not associated with the absence of SARD.

Frecuencia de ANA/DFS70 en familiares de pacientes con artritis reumatoide comparados con pacientes con artritis reumatoide y población sana y su asociación con el estado de salud / Frequency of ANA/DFS70 in Relatives of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared to Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and a Healthy Population, and its Association with Health Status

Introducción: Los ANA/DFS70 han atraído el interés por su frecuencia en individuos sin evidencia clínica de enfermedad reumática sistémica autoinmune, no se han evaluado grupos de riesgo genético para artritis reumatoide (AR). Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia de ANA y ANA/DFS70 en familiares consanguíneos (FC) de AR comparada con pacientes con AR temprana (ARt) e individuos control y su asociación con el estado de salud. Metodología: Estudio de corte transversal con componente analítico. Análisis de 60 pacientes ARt, 60 FC y 120 individuos control pareados por edad y sexo. Se analizaron ANA-HEp2 y ANA/DFS70. Establecieron las frecuencias absolutas y relativas y asociaciones con modelos de regresión logística, con un nivel de significación del 95%. Resultados: ANA de 43% en ARt, 30% en FC y 25,8% en individuos control a título 1:80. El patrón granular fino denso por Hep2 convencional se encontró en el 12,9% de las muestras positivas y el 1,66% del total de muestras. En ANA/DFS70 (+) en 1,66% en FC y 2,5% de individuos control, representando el 75% de la muestras positivas y el 1,25% del total de las muestras. No hubo detección de ANAS-DFS70 en pacientes con ARt. En ARt hubo asociación entre la presencia de ANA y articulaciones inflamadas (p=0,02), PCR (p=0,01), DAS28PCR (p=0,03) y HAQ (p=0,04). Asociación entre ANA y PCR elevada (p=0,05) en FC. En individuos control entre ANA y articulaciones dolorosas (p=0,02). En individuos ANA-DFS70 observamos asociación con VSG normal p=0,032, FR (-), p=0,044 y ausencia de articulaciones dolorosas, p=0,039. Conclusiones: La frecuencia de ANA/DFS70 en los grupos estudiados fue baja, ninguno de los pacientes con ARt fue positivo. Se confirma la presencia de ANA/DFS70 solo en individuos sanos sistémicamente.(AU)

Introduction: DFS70 ANAs have attracted interest due to their frequency in individuals with no clinical evidence of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, groups with genetic risk for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were not assessed. Objective: To determine the frequency of ANA and DFS70 ANA in blood relatives (BR) of people with RA compared to patients with early RA (ERA), and control individuals, and its association with health status. Methodology: A cross-sectional study with an analytical component. Sixty ERA patients, 60 BR and 120 control individuals paired by age and sex were studied. Hep2-ANA and DFS70 ANA were studied. The absolute and relative frequencies and associations were established using logistic regression models, with a significance level of 95%. Results: 43% ANA in ERA, 30% in BR, and 25.8% in control individuals 1:80. The fine dense granular pattern based on conventional Hep2 was found in 12.9% of the positive samples, and 1.66% of the total samples. There was no detection of DFS70 ANAs in patients with ERA. In ERA there was an association between the presence of ANA and inflamed joints (p=.02), CRP (p=.01), DAS28CRP (p=.03) and HAQ (p=.04). There was an association between ANA and elevated CRP (p=.05) in the BR. In the control individuals, there was an association between ANA and painful joints (p=02). In DFS70 ANA individuals we observed an association between a normal ESR p=.032, BR (-), p=.044 and absence of painful joints, p=.039. Conclusions: The frequency of DFS70 ANA in the groups studied was low, none of the patients with ERA was positive. The presence of DFS70 ANA was only confirmed in systemically healthy individuals.(AU)

Frequency of ANA/DFS70 in Relatives of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared to Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and a Healthy Population, and its Association with Health Status. / Frecuencia de ANA/DFS70 en familiares de pacientes con artritis reumatoide comparados con pacientes con artritis reumatoide y población sana y su asociación con el estado de salud.

INTRODUCTION: DFS70 ANAs have attracted interest due to their frequency in individuals with no clinical evidence of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, groups with genetic risk for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were not assessed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of ANA and DFS70 ANA in blood relatives (BR) of people with RA compared to patients with early RA (ERA), and control individuals, and its association with health status. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study with an analytical component. Sixty ERA patients, 60 BR and 120 control individuals paired by age and sex were studied. Hep2-ANA and DFS70 ANA were studied. The absolute and relative frequencies and associations were established using logistic regression models, with a significance level of 95%. RESULTS: 43% ANA in ERA, 30% in BR, and 25.8% in control individuals 1:80. The fine dense granular pattern based on conventional Hep2 was found in 12.9% of the positive samples, and 1.66% of the total samples. There was no detection of DFS70 ANAs in patients with ERA. In ERA there was an association between the presence of ANA and inflamed joints (p=.02), CRP (p=.01), DAS28CRP (p=.03) and HAQ (p=.04). There was an association between ANA and elevated CRP (p=.05) in the BR. In the control individuals, there was an association between ANA and painful joints (p=02). In DFS70 ANA individuals we observed an association between a normal ESR p=.032, BR (-), p=.044 and absence of painful joints, p=.039. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of DFS70 ANA in the groups studied was low, none of the patients with ERA was positive. The presence of DFS70 ANA was only confirmed in systemically healthy individuals.

[Antinuclear antibodies in the diagnostics of rheumatic diseases]. / Antinukleäre Antikörper in der Diagnostik rheumatischer Erkrankungen.

Testing for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) on human epithelial cell lines (HEp-2) using indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) is central for ruling out or for diagnosing connective tissue diseases and other diseases, such as primary biliary cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis as well as drug-induced ANA. The comprehensive description of 29 different ANA-IIF patterns by the international consensus of ANA patterns (ICAP) facilitates the harmonization of ANA-IIF diagnostics. Positive ANA tests are frequently observed in healthy individuals and a reason for referral to rheumatologists. In these cases, the detection of anti-DFS70 antibodies can be helpful to exclude systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Clinical value of anti-DFS70 antibodies in a cohort of patients undergoing routine antinuclear antibodies testing.

BACKGROUND: It is has been proposed that the presence of anti-DFS70 antibodies could be used to eliminate a SARD diagnosis. However, anti-DFS70 antibodies were also observed at relatively high frequency in patients with SARD. The clinical significance of these antibodies is therefore not yet clear. In this study, we assessed the clinical significance of the presence of anti-DFS70 antibodies. METHODS: A total of 3432 sera samples were obtained from patients who underwent routinely requested ANA screening in the clinical laboratory of a University Hospital, between June 2017 and June 2019. Antinuclear antibody testing was performed by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on Hep-2 cell substrates (Euroimmun, Germany), and anti-ENA were measured by LIA (Euroimmun, Germany). RESULTS: Among 3432 serum samples tested for ANA, 57.3% were ANA positive by IIF. Participants had mean age of 46.4 and 74.8% of the participants were female. Only 11.4% of the study population had SARD. The frequency of DFS pattern by IIF was 8.1%. Analysis of the DFS pattern positive samples by LIA revealed the presence of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in 67.5% of all DFS, AC-2 pattern ANAs. When using the results of the ANA IIF HEp-2 DFS pattern/Anti-DFS70 LIA, likelihood ratio (LR) for SARD was 0.33. When comparing the ANA IIF HEp-2 DFS pattern with anti-DFS70 LIA, the ANA IIF HEp-2 DFS pattern's LR was lower (0.63 vs 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Although the DFS pattern cannot exclude the presence of SARD, the likelihood is lower than with other patterns. Therefore, anti-DFS70 antibodies represent an important biomarker that can aid in the interpretation of positive ANA patients and, therefore, should be included in test algorithms for ANA testing. The optimal test algorithm might be laboratory specific being dependent on referral patterns for ANA testing.

Prevalence of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in a Latin American cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and without autoimmune diseases.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Anti-dense fine speckled 70 (DFS70) autoantibodies were reported to be more prevalent in healthy individuals than those with autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We determined anti-DFS70 autoantibody prevalence in a Latin American cohort of patients with SLE and healthy individuals. METHODS: This study included 127 individuals with anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs; > 1:160) suggesting the presence of anti-DFS70, including 64 patients with SLE and 63 healthy controls. The anti-DFS70 autoantibodies were determined by immunoadsorption using NOVA Lite® HEp-2 Select kit with DAPI. Negative fluorescence after adsorption with the DFS70 antigen indicated anti-DFS70 autoantibody positivity. RESULTS: The presence of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies was confirmed by indirect immunofluorescence in 21 (33.3%) healthy controls and 8 (12.5%) patients with SLE (p = 0.005). Among the anti-DFS70-positive patients with SLE, the most frequent compromise was renal involvement in six cases (75%), 4 patients (37.5%) were positive for anti-Sm, which was the most frequently associated antibody, and one patient (12.5%) was positive for anti-DNA. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-DFS70 autoantibodies might be considered a biomarker to differentiate patients with SLE from ANA-positive individuals without autoimmune diseases. KEY POINTS: • In a Latin American cohort, the anti-DFS70 was higher in individuals without autoimmune diseases compared with that in patients with SLE.• The anti-DFS70 might have utility as a biomarker of exclusion in patients with non-specific clinical signs of AARDs.

Economic Analysis of the Use of Anti-DFS70 Antibody Test in Patients with Undifferentiated Systemic Autoimmune Disease Symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and undifferentiated features of systemic autoimmune disease, the coexistence of monospecific anti-dense fine speckled 70 (anti-DFS70) antibodies is associated with a lower risk of progression to overt disease. Therefore, they might help in correctly classifying ANA- positive patients and avoiding unnecessary followup diagnostic procedures. The aim of this study was to analyze the economic effect of the introduction of the anti-DFS70 antibody test in a hospital setting. METHODS: A case-control study was performed to detect monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies in ANA-positive subjects with undifferentiated features (cases, n = 124) and with a defined systemic autoimmune disease (controls, n = 290). Based on current clinical practice, a decision tree was developed to represent the disease course of patients with undifferentiated features in the subsequent 3 years. A budget impact analysis (BIA) was performed to estimate the effect of implementing the screening for anti-DFS70 antibodies in the case group on the total costs. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to calculate the effect of the uncertainty of the input variables on the results. RESULTS: Among the 124 patients in the case group, 5 (4.0%) tested positive for anti-DFS70 antibodies versus 4/290 (1.4%) in the control group (p = not significant). The mean cost per patient under the current clinical practice decreased from €3274 to €3192 in our scenario. The BIA reports cost savings of €10,128. CONCLUSION: The introduction of anti-DFS70 antibody test would avoid unnecessary followup diagnostic procedures and minimize the use of health resources generated by suspicion of a potential systemic autoimmune disease.

Clinical Aspects of the Dense Fine Speckled Pattern in Indirect Immunofluorescence-Antinuclear Antibody Screening and Its Association with DFS70 Autoantibodies.

GOALS: The existence of anti-dense fine speckled (DFS) 70 autoantibodies are considered an exclusionary biomarker for systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Several tests to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies have been introduced, and the use of them in specimens with a DFS pattern in indirect immunofluorescence-antinuclear antibody (IIF-ANA) testing has been suggested. However, these additional tests have only been evaluated in a small number of samples; their clinical usefulness therefore requires further evaluation. METHODS: A total of 213 serum specimens showing DFS (n=155) or homogeneous (H; n=58) patterns were included. All specimens were tested by western blotting (WB) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Clinical information regarding SARDs was analyzed. RESULTS: The detection rates for WB and EIA for anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in specimens with a DFS pattern were 86.5% and 73.5%, respectively. Detection rates in specimens with a low IIF-ANA titer were significantly lower than those in specimens with a high titer. The detection rate of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in 58 specimens with an H pattern was 10.3% (6/58). Among 155 subjects with a DFS pattern in IIF-ANA staining, only five were diagnosed with SARD. CONCLUSIONS: There is little need to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies using other methods. When a DFS pattern is observed in IIF-ANA staining, it is more important to confirm the presence of other autoantibodies related to SARDs than to identify anti-DFS70 autoantibodies. Finally, more careful interpretation of IIF-ANA to specimens with a low IIF-ANA titer is needed.

Investigation of anti-DFS70 antibody in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Dense fine-speckled 70 (DFS70) antibody is defined as an antinuclear antibody (ANA) pattern in indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). The presence of anti-DFS70 antibody has been shown as a potential marker for the exclusion of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) (without any other SARD-associated autoantibodies). We aimed to investigate the frequency of anti-DFS70 antibodies in patients with SARD and in the blood bank donors (BD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consists of 418 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 101 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 71 Sjogren's syndrome (SS), 43 ankylosing spondylitis (AS), 36 systemic sclerosis-scleroderma (SSc), 2555 undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), and 507 BD. All samples were tested on the HEp-2 IIF-ANA assay. Samples that showed DFS70 pattern in IIF were confirmed by a specific DFS70 antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: The DFS70 pattern was detected in 43 (1.33%) in SARD and four (0.78%) in BD. The anti-DFS70 antibody was detected in three (0.59%) in BD, six (1.43%) in RA, three (2.97%) in SLE, one (1.40%) in SS, and 25 (0.97%) in UCTD, however, it was not detected in AS and SSc by ELISA. There was no significant difference between BD and SARD (p = 0.28). Distinctly, the frequency of anti-DFS70 was significantly different for SLE in SARD (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Anti-DFS70 antibody was more prevalent in the subsets of SARD than BD. This result may be related to the demographic formation of study groups and individual immunological status. More comprehensive studies are needed to investigate the importance of the anti-DFS70 antibody for SARD.Key Points• This study draws attention to the importance of anti-DFS70 antibodies in the diagnostic algorithm in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.• This study emphasizes the further investigation of anti-DFS70 antibodies in undifferentiated connective tissue diseases.• This study emphasizes the need to verify the DFS70 pattern detected in IIF-ANA test for definitive diagnosis with additional confirmation methods.

Improved accuracy in DFS pattern interpretation using a novel HEp-2 ELITE system.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Accurate interpretation of DFS70 (dense fine speckled 70) and mixed antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) patterns can be challenging using conventional HEp-2 immunofluorescence (IIF) method. We evaluated a novel HEp-2 IIF substrate (HEp-2 ELITE/DFS70-KO) composed of a mixture of engineered HEp-2 devoid of the DFS70 autoantigen and conventional HEp-2 cells. The study assessed the utility of the new substrate in ANA screening and its advantages. METHOD: One thousand and five consecutive routine samples sent for ANA screening were tested on both standard HEp-2 and the HEp-2 ELITE DFS70 KO substrates (ImmuGlo ANA HEp-2 and HEp-2 ELITE/DFS70-KO, Trinity Biotech, Buffalo, NY). Anti-DFS70 antibody specificity was additionally determined by immunoblot (IB). Clinical and serological data were included in the analysis of the overall impact of the novel HEp-2 substrate on DFS pattern interpretation. RESULTS: Of the 22 cases suspected as positive for DFS pattern alone or in combination with homogeneous or speckled patterns on conventional HEp-2 cells, 17 were interpreted with a higher accuracy using the new HEp-2 ELITE method as positive for DFS70 (monospecific DFS70 (10), mixed DFS70 (7)), speckled (3), and DFS (2) patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The new substrate was not only useful in deciphering unclear mixed ANA patterns but also highly sensitive in detecting DFS70 pattern in comparison to the DFS70 positivity obtained using IB.

Anti-DFS70 antibodies: an update on our current understanding and their clinical usefulness.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-DFS70 antibodies and their clinical associations remain an immunological paradox. Unlike other antinuclear antibodies (ANA), there is a growing body of evidence that anti-DFS70 antibodies, when present in high titers and in isolation (without accompanying other antibodies), are useful to aid in the exclusion of ANA associated rheumatic diseases. Areas covered: This review aims to analyze and interpret the current published knowledge and recent findings to provide guidance in the use of anti-DFS70 antibodies to analyze associations of this unique autoantibody. Expert commentary: Although the association of anti-DFS70 antibodies is still unknown, their use as a biomarker that can aid in the exclusion of ANA related diseases is well-established.