Wound Modulations in Glaucoma Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Excessive fibrosis and resultant poor control of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduce the efficacy of glaucoma surgeries. Historically, corticosteroids and anti-fibrotic agents, such as mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), have been used to mitigate post-surgical fibrosis, but these have unpredictable outcomes. Therefore, there is a need to develop novel treatments which provide increased effectiveness and specificity. This review aims to provide insight into the pathophysiology behind wound healing in glaucoma surgery, as well as the current and promising future wound healing agents that are less toxic and may provide better IOP control.

Targeting the TGF-ß signaling pathway: an updated patent review (2021-present).

INTRODUCTION: The TGF-ß signaling pathway is a complex network that plays a crucial role in regulating essential biological functions and is implicated in the onset and progression of multiple diseases. This review highlights the recent advancements in developing inhibitors targeting the TGF-ß signaling pathway and their potential therapeutic applications in various diseases. AREA COVERED: The review discusses patents on active molecules related to the TGF-ß signaling pathway, focusing on three strategies: TGF-ß activity inhibition, blocking TGF-ß receptor binding, and disruption of the signaling pathway using small molecule inhibitors. Combination therapies and the development of fusion proteins targeting multiple pathways are also explored. The literature search was conducted using the Cortellis Drug Discovery Intelligence database, covering patents from 2021 onwards. EXPERT OPINION: The development of drugs targeting the TGF-ß signaling pathway has made significant progress in recent years. However, addressing challenges such as specificity, systemic toxicity, and patient selection is crucial for their successful clinical application. Targeting the TGF-ß signaling pathway holds promise as a promising approach for the treatment of various diseases.

[Wound healing after trabeculectomy : What and when in postoperative aftercare?] / Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie : Was wann in der postoperativen Nachsorge?

Excessive wound healing in filtering glaucoma surgery is a key factor for a failed surgery. After the introduction of trabeculectomy in the 1960s many factors associated with an increased fibrotic reaction were recognized and methods were developed to influence postoperative wound healing. These range from the perioperative use of anti-inflammatory drugs and antimetabolites to the use of newer chemical compounds that influence the morphology of postoperative fibroblast growth. In the routine clinical practice, the fine tuning of therapeutic decisions plays a decisive role in the success or failure of filtration surgery.

The Impact of Switching to a Second Antifibrotic in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Retrospective Multicentre Study From the EMPIRE Registry

Introduction Most patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) treated with antifibrotics (AF) have progressive disease despite treatment. A switch of AF may improve survival, but evidence from randomised controlled trials is missing. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an AF switch on survival and FVC decline in patients from the European MultiPartner IPF registry (EMPIRE). Methods The study included 612 patients who discontinued the first antifibrotic therapy. Patients were grouped and analysed from two perspectives: (1) whether they had received a second antifibrotic treatment after the discontinuation of the first therapy, and (2) a reason for discontinuation of the first AF – “lack of efficacy” (LE) and “intolerance” (INT). Results While 263 (43%) of 612 patients received no second AF (“non-switched”), 349 (57%) patients switched. Overall survival was higher in patients who received a second AF (median 50 vs. 29 months; adjusted HR 0.64, P=0.023). Similarly, the annual FVC decline was significantly reduced in switched patients: −98ml/y in switched and −172ml/y in non-switched patients (P=0.023), respectively. The switched patients had similar risk for mortality in both LE and INT groups (adjusted HR 0.95, P=0.85). The high impact of switching on survival was demonstrated in LE patients (adjusted HR 0.27, P<0.001). Conclusion The patients without a second AF had significantly shorter overall survival. Our analysis suggests the importance of switching patients with an ineffective first AF therapy to a second AF therapy (AU)

Factors influencing long-term outcomes in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) diagnosed through multidisciplinary discussion (MDD): a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic process for fibrotic interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) is notably intricate, necessitating a multidisciplinary discussion to achieve consensus based on both clinical and radiological features. This study investigated the shared and distinctive long-term mortality predictors among the two primary phenotypes of F-ILD, namely idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). METHODS: We included patients with F-ILD diagnosed from December 2018 to December 2019 and conducted follow-up assessments until February 2023. Age, gender, usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, gender-age-physiology (GAP) score, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score, antifibrotic agent use, pulmonary function test parameters, and six-minute walking test (6MWT) parameters were recorded at baseline and used as mortality predictors in a multivariate Cox regression model. RESULTS: We enrolled 104 ILD patients. The survival rate of non-IPF patients was more than twice that of IPF patients (78.9% vs. 34%, p < 0.001), and the survival rate of patients with a GAP score of 0-2 was more than twice that of patients with a score of > 2 (93.2% vs. 36.6%, p < 0.001). Older age, male gender, definite UIP pattern, higher GAP score, higher mMRC dyspnea score, lower forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), shorter 6MWT distance, and lower initial and final SpO2 were also associated with higher long-term mortality (p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, only a GAP score of > 2 (hazard ratio [HR]:16.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.28-85.14; p = 0.001) and definite UIP pattern (HR: 4.08; 95% CI 1.07-15.5; p = 0.039) were significantly associated with overall mortality. CONCLUSION: The long-term mortality rate of IPF patients was higher than that of CTD-ILD patients. The GAP score and UIP patterns were significant mortality predictors for both IPF and CTD-ILD patients.

Screening for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease-a Delphi-based consensus statement.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is a major driver of premature mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Detection of RA-ILD is crucial but requires awareness among the treating physicians. To date, however, there is no international recommendation concerning screening for ILD in RA patients. METHODS: After a systematic literature review, the modified Delphi technique in combination with the nominal group technique was used to provide a Delphi consensus statement elaborated by an expert panel of pneumonologists, rheumatologists, and a radiologist. Based on the available evidence, several clusters of questions were defined and discussed until consent was reached. RESULTS: A screening algorithm for ILD in patients with RA based on clinical signs, respiratory symptoms, and risk factors has been developed. Further, the recommendations address diagnostic tools for RA-ILD and the follow-up of RA patients qualifying for ILD screening.

The Impact of Integrated Palliative Care on Survival in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Retrospective Multicenter Comparison.

Background: Early and integrated palliative care is recommended for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Unfortunately, palliative care delivery remains poor due to various barriers in practice. This study describes various palliative care delivery models in a real-world cohort of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, examines the predictors of survival in this cohort of patients, and explores the impact of palliative care on survival. Design: Charts were reviewed retrospectively and analyzed. The primary outcome was survival during a 4-year follow-up period. Two multivariable models were created to examine the impact of therapeutic strategies including palliative intervention on survival. Results: 298 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were enrolled from 3 interstitial lung disease clinics with different palliative care models in Edmonton, Canada; Bristol, UK; and Kingston, Canada. 200 (67%) patients received palliative care and 119 (40%) died during follow up. Primary palliative care models (Edmonton and Bristol) delivered palliative care to 96% and 100% respectively compared 21% in the referral model (Queens). Palliative care [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) .28 (.12-.65)] along with the use of antifibrotics [aHR .56 (.37-.84)], and body mass index >30 [aHR .47 (.37-.85)] reduced the risk of death in our idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis cohort. Opioid use was associated with worse survival [aHR 2.11 (1.30-23.43)]. Conclusions: Both palliative care and antifibrotic use were associated with survival benefit in this cohort of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis after adjusting for covariates. The benefit was seen despite differences in disease severity and different palliative care delivery models.

Effects of nintedanib in patients with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and interstitial lung disease.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the course of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the effects of nintedanib in patients with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc). METHODS: In the SENSCIS trial, patients with SSc-ILD were randomized to receive nintedanib or placebo. Patients who completed the SENSCIS trial were eligible to enter SENSCIS-ON, in which all patients received open-label nintedanib. RESULTS: Among 277 patients with lcSSc treated in the SENSCIS trial, the rate (s.e.) of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC; ml/year) over 52 weeks was -74.5 (19.2) in the placebo group and -49.1 (19.8) in the nintedanib group (difference: 25.3 [95% CI -28.9, 79.6]). Among 249 patients with data at week 52, mean (s.e.) change in FVC at week 52 was -86.4 (21.1) ml in the placebo group and -39.1 (22.2) ml in the nintedanib group. Among 183 patients with lcSSc who participated in SENSCIS-ON and had data at week 52, mean (s.e.) change in FVC from baseline to week 52 of SENSCIS-ON was -41.5 (24.0) ml in patients who took placebo in the SENSCIS trial and initiated nintedanib in SENSCIS-ON and -45.1 (19.1) ml in patients who took nintedanib in the SENSCIS trial and continued it in SENSCIS-ON. CONCLUSION: Patients with lcSSc may develop progressive fibrosing ILD. By targeting pulmonary fibrosis, nintedanib slows decline in lung function in patients with lcSSc and ILD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT02597933 and NCT03313180.

Ab-Externo MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Two-Year Results from a Randomized, Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of the MicroShunt (Santen Inc) versus trabeculectomy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, multicenter trial conducted in the United States and Europe. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (aged 40-85 years) with mild to severe POAG inadequately controlled on maximum tolerated medical therapy and intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 15 mmHg and ≤ 40 mmHg. METHODS: Patients were randomized 3:1 to stand-alone MicroShunt implantation (n = 395) or trabeculectomy (n = 132), both augmented with mitomycin C (MMC) 0.2 mg/ml for 2 minutes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary effectiveness end point was surgical success, defined as ≥ 20% reduction in mean diurnal IOP from baseline with no increase in glaucoma medications. Secondary end points included changes in mean IOP and medication use from baseline and the need for postoperative interventions. RESULTS: At 2 years, the rate of surgical success was lower in the MicroShunt group than in the trabeculectomy group (50.6% vs. 64.4%, P = 0.005). Mean diurnal IOP was reduced from 21.1 ± 4.9 mmHg at baseline to 13.9 ± 3.9 mmHg at 24 months in the MicroShunt group and from 21.1 ± 5.0 mmHg at baseline to 10.7 ± 3.7 mmHg at 24 months in the trabeculectomy group (P < 0.001 compared with baseline in both groups). Mean medication use decreased from 3.1 to 0.9 in the MicroShunt group and from 2.9 to 0.4 in the trabeculectomy group (P < 0.001 compared with baseline in both groups). Adverse events at 2 years were generally similar in the 2 groups, except that hypotony was more common in eyes undergoing trabeculectomy (51.1% vs. 30.9%, P < 0.001). Repositioning or explantation of the implant occurred in 6.8% of MicroShunt patients. The majority of these patients had device removal at the time of subsequent glaucoma surgery. Vision-threatening complications were uncommon in both groups. CONCLUSION: At 2 years, both the MicroShunt and trabeculectomy provided significant reductions in IOP and medication use, with trabeculectomy continuing to have greater surgical success. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

The Impact of Switching to a Second Antifibrotic in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Retrospective Multicentre Study From the EMPIRE Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Most patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) treated with antifibrotics (AF) have progressive disease despite treatment. A switch of AF may improve survival, but evidence from randomised controlled trials is missing. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an AF switch on survival and FVC decline in patients from the European MultiPartner IPF registry (EMPIRE). METHODS: The study included 612 patients who discontinued the first antifibrotic therapy. Patients were grouped and analysed from two perspectives: (1) whether they had received a second antifibrotic treatment after the discontinuation of the first therapy, and (2) a reason for discontinuation of the first AF - "lack of efficacy" (LE) and "intolerance" (INT). RESULTS: While 263 (43%) of 612 patients received no second AF ("non-switched"), 349 (57%) patients switched. Overall survival was higher in patients who received a second AF (median 50 vs. 29 months; adjusted HR 0.64, P=0.023). Similarly, the annual FVC decline was significantly reduced in switched patients: -98ml/y in switched and -172ml/y in non-switched patients (P=0.023), respectively. The switched patients had similar risk for mortality in both LE and INT groups (adjusted HR 0.95, P=0.85). The high impact of switching on survival was demonstrated in LE patients (adjusted HR 0.27, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The patients without a second AF had significantly shorter overall survival. Our analysis suggests the importance of switching patients with an ineffective first AF therapy to a second AF therapy.

Lista de comprobación para la atención farmacéutica del paciente con enfermedad pulmonar intersticial (CheckEPID): un consenso basado en el método Delphi / Checklist for Pharmaceutical Care of the Patient with interstitial lung disease (CheckEPID): A Delphi-based consensus

Objetivo desarrollar una lista de comprobación para facilitar la atención farmacéutica al paciente con enfermedad pulmonar intersticial que requieren o están en tratamiento con antifibróticos. Método 5 especialistas en farmacia hospitalaria desarrollaron un listado inicial de 37 ítems divididos en 4 bloques: 1) primera visita del paciente, que incluía datos generales del paciente y datos del primer tratamiento; 2) visitas de seguimiento, valorando aspectos del seguimiento del tratamiento con nintedanib o pirfenidona; 3) telefarmacia, consistente en la evaluación de la inclusión de pacientes en un programa de este tipo, evolución de la enfermedad e identificación del contacto con el servicio de farmacia y 4) tratamiento no farmacológico e información al paciente. Para decidir su potencial inclusión en el listado de comprobación se realizaron 2 rondas del Delphi en las que los panelistas tenían que valorar de cada ítem propuesto su grado de acuerdo con su «utilidad», que fue el criterio determinante para su inclusión y su «aplicabilidad». Resultados se contactó con 48 farmacéuticos hospitalarios, 30 (63%) aceptaron por escrito participar, 28 (58%) completaron la primera ronda del Delphi y 27 (56%) completaron la segunda ronda. Después de la primera ronda el cuestionario se modificó y quedó constituido por 40 ítems. De los 40 ítems evaluados tras las 2 rondas del Delphi, hubo 2 que, basados en la utilidad, los participantes del Delphi no alcanzaron el consenso para su inclusión en el listado: el referido a «Antecedentes de intervención quirúrgica, específicamente cirugía abdominal en las últimas 4 semanas» (finalmente mantenido en el listado por su implicación en la indicación de nintedanib) y el de realizar recomendaciones sobre «Relajación». En 2 de los ítems no se alcanzó consenso sobre su aplicabilidad: «Estratificación del paciente según el modelo del paciente crónico de la SEFH» y «Recogida de resultados comunicados por el paciente». Conclusiones... (AU)

Objective To develop a checklist to facilitate pharmaceutical care for patients with interstitial lung disease who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs. Method Five hospital pharmacists developed an initial list of 37 items divided into 4 blocks: 1) First visit, which included general patient data and data from the first treatment; 2) Follow-up visits, assessing aspects of the follow-up of the treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone; 3) Telepharmacy, consisting of the evaluation of the inclusion of patients in a program of this type, course of the disease, and identification of the contact with the pharmacy service; 4) Non-pharmacological treatment and patient information. To decide its potential inclusion in the checklist, two rounds of the Delphi were carried out in which the panelists had to assess the degree of agreement of each proposed item according to its “utility”, which was the determining criterion for its inclusion, and its “applicability”. Results 48 hospital pharmacists were contacted, 30 (63%) agreed in writing to participate, 28 (58%) completed the first round of the Delphi, and 27 (56%) completed the second round. After the first round of the Delphi the questionnaire was amended and comprised 40 items. Of the 40 items evaluated after the two rounds of the Delphi, there were two that, based on utility, the participants did not reach consensus for inclusion in the checklist: The one referring to “History of surgical intervention, specifically abdominal surgery in the last 4 weeks” (finally kept on the checklist due to its involvement in the indication of nintedanib) and to make recommendations on “Relaxation”. No consensus was reached on their applicability for two of the items: “Patient stratification according to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) chronic patient model” and “Collection of Results Reported by the Patient”. Conclusions ... (AU)

Antifibrotic Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is a common extra-articular clinical manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that has negative impacts on morbidity and mortality. In addition, there has been no proven treatment for RA-ILD to date. Thus, we planned a meta-analysis of a literature search to confirm the clinical effects of antifibrotic agents in RA-ILD patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted the literature search in Ovid MEDLIVE® databases, Cochrane Library databases, EMBASE, and KoreaMed and identified references elucidating the role of nintedanib or pirfenidone in adult patients with RA-ILD. Among the identified studies, those with comparative interventions, complete results of clinical trials, and available full text were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the effect of the antifibrotic agent on disease progression in RA-ILD patients assessed with a mean difference in the change of forced vital capacity (FVC) and the proportion of patients with an increase in percent predicted FVC of 10% or more over 52 weeks. Analysis for heterogeneity was assessed through I2 statistics. Meta-analysis with a fixed effect model was performed on changes in FVC. RESULTS: A total of 153 articles were identified through database searches, of which 28 were excluded because of duplication. After additional screening, 109 studies were selected with full text and two articles qualified for analysis according to the set inclusion and exclusion criteria. As a result, two randomized controlled studies were selected, comparing nintedanib and pirfenidone to placebo, respectively. The meta-analysis revealed that antifibrotic agents showed a significant reduction in FVC decline compared to placebo in patients with RA-ILD (mean difference, 88.30; 95% CI, 37.10-139.50). Additionally, there were significantly fewer patients experienced an increase in percent predicted FVC of 10% or more in the antifibrotic agent group compared to the placebo group (Odds ratio 0.42; 95% CI 0.19-0.95, p = 0.04). There was no significant heterogeneity between the two included studies (χ2 = 0.35, p = 0.0007, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis suggests that nintedanib and pirfenidone may have clinical utility in reducing disease progression in patients with RA-ILD. Further research is needed to confirm the clinical benefits of antifibrotic agents in RA-ILD.

[Translated article] Checklist for the pharmaceutical care of patients with interstitial lung disease (CheckEPID): A Delphi-based consensus.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a checklist to facilitate pharmaceutical care for patients with interstitial lung disease who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs. METHOD: Five hospital pharmacists developed an initial list of 37 items divided into 4 blocks: (1) First visit, which included general patient data and data from the first treatment; (2) follow-up visits, assessing aspects of the follow-up of the treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone; (3) telepharmacy, consisting of the evaluation of the inclusion of patients in a program of this type, course of the disease, and identification of the contact with the pharmacy service; (4) non-pharmacological treatment and patient information. To decide its potential inclusion in the checklist, 2 rounds of the Delphi were carried out in which the panelists had to assess the degree of agreement of each proposed item according to its "utility", which was the determining criterion for its inclusion, and its "applicability". RESULTS: Forty-eight hospital pharmacists were contacted, 30 (63%) agreed in writing to participate, 28 (58%) completed the first round of the Delphi, and 27 (56%) completed the second round. After the first round of the Delphi, the questionnaire was amended and comprised 40 items. Of the 40 items evaluated after the 2 rounds of the Delphi, there were 2 that, based on utility, the participants did not reach consensus for inclusion in the checklist: the one referring to "History of surgical intervention, specifically abdominal surgery in the last 4 weeks" (finally kept on the checklist due to its involvement in the indication of nintedanib) and to make recommendations on "Relaxation". No consensus was reached on their applicability for 2 of the items: "Patient stratification according to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) chronic patient model" and "Collection of Results Reported by the Patient". CONCLUSIONS: The management of patients with ILD and/or pulmonary fibrosis is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach where the hospital pharmacist plays a key role, especially, although not only, in monitoring drug treatment. We believe that this checklist can contribute from pharmaceutical care to improving the integrated care of patients with ILD who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs.

Effect of Nintedanib in Patients with Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Subgroups with Differing Baseline Characteristics.

INTRODUCTION: In the INBUILD trial in patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), nintedanib slowed the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC; mL/year) over 52 weeks compared with placebo. We assessed the efficacy of nintedanib across subgroups in the INBUILD trial by baseline characteristics. METHODS: We assessed the rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks and time to progression of interstitial lung disease (ILD) (absolute decline from baseline in FVC % predicted > 10%) or death over the whole trial in subgroups based on sex, age, race, body mass index (BMI), time since diagnosis of ILD, FVC % predicted, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLco) % predicted, composite physiologic index (CPI), GAP (gender, age, lung physiology) stage, use of anti-acid therapy and use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at baseline. RESULTS: The effect of nintedanib versus placebo on reducing the rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks was consistent across the subgroups by baseline characteristics analysed. Interaction p values did not indicate heterogeneity in the treatment effect between these subgroups (p > 0.05). Over the whole trial (median follow-up time ∼19 months), progression of ILD or death occurred in similar or lower proportions of patients treated with nintedanib than placebo across the subgroups analysed, with no heterogeneity detected between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In the INBUILD trial, no heterogeneity was detected in the effect of nintedanib on reducing the rate of ILD progression across subgroups based on demographics, ILD severity or use of anti-acid therapy or DMARDs. These data support the use of nintedanib as a treatment for progressive pulmonary fibrosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02999178.

Genetic variations in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and patient response to pirfenidone.

Background: Genetic variations in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) affect survival and outcomes. Current antifibrotic agents are managed based on the patient's reported side effects, although certain single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) might alter treatment response and survival depending on the antifibrotic administered. This study investigated variations in response and outcomes to pirfenidone based on patients-specific genetic profiles. Methods: Retrospective clinical data were collected from 56 IPF patients and had blood drawn for DNA extraction between 7/2013 and 3/2016, with the last patient followed until 10/2018. Nine SNPs were selected for pharmacogenetic investigation based on prior associations with IPF treatment outcomes or implications for pirfenidone metabolism. Genetic variants were examined in relation to clinical data and treatment outcomes. Results: Of the 56 patients, 38 were males (67.85%). The average age of IPF at diagnosis was 66.88 years. At the initiation of pirfenidone, the average percent predicted FVC was 70.7%, and the average DLCO percent predicted was 50.02% (IQR 40-61%). Among the genetic variants tested, the TOLLIP rs5743890 risk allele was significantly associated with improved survival, with increasing pirfenidone duration. This finding was observed with CC or CT genotype carriers but not for those with the TT genotype (p = 0.0457). Similarly, the TGF-B1 rs1800470 risk allele was also significantly associated with improved survival with longer pirfenidone therapy (p = 0.0395), even though it was associated with disease progression. Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that in IPF patients, the TOLLIP rs5743890 genotypes CC and CT, as well as TGF-B1 rs 1800470 may be associated with increased survival when treated with pirfenidone.

Pharmacological approaches to pulmonary fibrosis following COVID-19.

Background: In the past few years, COVID-19 became the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although the World Health Organization has declared an end to COVID-19 as a public health emergency, it can be expected, that the emerging new cases at the top of previous ones will result in an increasing number of patients with post-COVID-19 sequelae. Despite the fact that the majority of patients recover, severe acute lung tissue injury can in susceptible individuals progress to interstitial pulmonary involvement. Our goal is to provide an overview of various aspects associated with the Post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis with a focus on its potential pharmacological treatment options. Areas covered: We discuss epidemiology, underlying pathobiological mechanisms, and possible risk and predictive factors that were found to be associated with the development of fibrotic lung tissue remodelling. Several pharmacotherapeutic approaches are currently being applied and include anti-fibrotic drugs, prolonged use or pulses of systemic corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs. In addition, several repurposed or novel compounds are being investigated. Fortunately, clinical trials focused on pharmacological treatment regimens for post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis have been either designed, completed or are already in progress. However, the results are contrasting so far. High quality randomised clinical trials are urgently needed with respect to the heterogeneity of disease behaviour, patient characteristics and treatable traits. Conclusion: The Post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis contributes to the burden of chronic respiratory consequences among survivors. Currently available pharmacotherapeutic approaches mostly comprise repurposed drugs with a proven efficacy and safety profile, namely, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and antifibrotics. The role of nintedanib and pirfenidone is promising in this area. However, we still need to verify conditions under which the potential to prevent, slow or stop progression of lung damage will be fulfilled.

Checklist for Pharmaceutical Care of the Patient with interstitial lung disease (CheckEPID): A Delphi-based consensus. / Lista de comprobación para la atención farmacéutica del paciente con enfermedad pulmonar intersticial (CheckEPID): un consenso basado en el método Delphi.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a checklist to facilitate pharmaceutical care for patients with interstitial lung disease who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs. METHOD: Five hospital pharmacists developed an initial list of 37 items divided into 4 blocks: 1) First visit, which included general patient data and data from the first treatment; 2) Follow-up visits, assessing aspects of the follow-up of the treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone; 3) Telepharmacy, consisting of the evaluation of the inclusion of patients in a program of this type, course of the disease, and identification of the contact with the pharmacy service; 4) Non-pharmacological treatment and patient information. To decide its potential inclusion in the checklist, two rounds of the Delphi were carried out in which the panelists had to assess the degree of agreement of each proposed item according to its "utility", which was the determining criterion for its inclusion, and its "applicability". RESULTS: 48 hospital pharmacists were contacted, 30 (63%) agreed in writing to participate, 28 (58%) completed the first round of the Delphi, and 27 (56%) completed the second round. After the first round of the Delphi the questionnaire was amended and comprised 40 items. Of the 40 items evaluated after the two rounds of the Delphi, there were two that, based on utility, the participants did not reach consensus for inclusion in the checklist: The one referring to "History of surgical intervention, specifically abdominal surgery in the last 4 weeks" (finally kept on the checklist due to its involvement in the indication of nintedanib) and to make recommendations on "Relaxation". No consensus was reached on their applicability for two of the items: "Patient stratification according to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) chronic patient model" and "Collection of Results Reported by the Patient". CONCLUSIONS: The management of patients with ILD and/or pulmonary fibrosis is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach where the hospital pharmacist plays a key role, especially, although not only, in monitoring drug treatment. We believe that this checklist can contribute from pharmaceutical care to improving the integrated care of patients with ILD who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs.

Efficacy and safety of antifibrotic agents in the treatment of CTD-ILD and RA-ILD: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical spectrum of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) and rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) ranges from asymptomatic findings on radiographic imaging to a rapidly progressive illness leading to respiratory failure and death. The treatment is always challenging due to the paucity of proven effective treatments. Nintedanib and pirfenidone are recently approved antifibrotics in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of antifibrotic agents in the treatment of CTD-ILD and RA-ILD. METHODS: Relevant databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared pirfenidone or nintedanib with placebo in patients with CTD-ILD and RA-ILD. The primary outcome was the change in forced vital capacity (FVC). The odds ratio or risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for categorical data, and the mean difference with 95% CI was estimated for continuous data. The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity, and meta-analysis was performed when possible. RESULTS: Ten studies with a total of 880 participants met the inclusion criteria. Of these, four studies were included in the meta-analysis. According to the pooled result, the annual decline of FVC was significantly decreased in the antifibrotic agent arm compared to that in the placebo arm (MD 70.58 mL/yr, 95% CI 40.55 to 100.61). CONCLUSION: This review suggests a potential benefit and safety of antifibrotic treatment in slowing the decline of FVC in patients with CTD-ILD and RA-ILD. Further large-sample, random-controlled, high-quality trials are needed to provide more evidence in the decision-making regarding the use of antifibrotics in this group of patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO; No: CRD42022369112; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

A Real-World Prognosis in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Special Reference to the Role of Antifibrotic Agents for the Elderly.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common and severe form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, and its prevalence increases with age. In the era of pre-antifibrotic agents, the median survival time of Japanese patients with IPF is 35 months, with a 5-year survival rate in western countries ranging from 20% to 40%. The prevalence of IPF is highest in elderly patients aged ≥75 years; however, the efficacy and safety of long-term use of pirfenidone and/or nintedanib are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of the sole use of antifibrotic agents (pirfenidone or nintendanib) for IPF in the elderly. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed patients with IPF who were diagnosed and treated with either pirfenidone or nintedanib in our hospital between 2008 and 2019. We excluded patients with the subsequent use of both antifibrotic agents. We examined the survival probability and frequency of acute exacerbation, with focus on long-term use (≥1 year), elderly patients (≥75 years of age), and disease severity. RESULTS: We identified 91 patients with IPF (male to female ratio: 63 to 28, age 42 to 90 years). The numbers of patients with disease severity classified by JRS (I/II/III/IV) and GAP stage (I/II/III) were (38/6/17/20) and (39/36/6), respectively. The survival probabilities were comparable between the elderly (n = 46) and non-elderly groups (n = 45, p = 0.877). After the initiation of antifibrotic agents, the cumulative incidence ratio of acute exacerbation of IPF was significantly lower in the early stage (GAP stage I, n = 20) than in the progressive stage of disease (GAP stages II and III, n = 20, p = 0.028). A similar trend was noted in the JRS disease severity classification (I, II vs. III, IV) (n = 27 vs. n = 13, p = 0.072). In the long-term treatment (≥1 year) group (n = 40), the survival probabilities at 2 and 5 years after treatment initiation were 89.0% and 52.4%, respectively, which did not reach the median survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: Even in elderly patients (≥75 years of age), antifibrotic agents demonstrated positive effects on survival probability and the frequency of acute exacerbation. These positive effects would be improved for earlier JRS/GAP stages or long-term use.