Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 58
Filter
1.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; : 101931, 2024 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821192

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this European multicenter study was to describe the general characteristics and risk factors of MRONJ lesions as well as their clinical diagnosis and management at different European Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery centers, in order to minimize selections biases and provide information about the epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, and the current trends in the treatment of MRONJ across Europe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The following data were registered for each patient: gender; age at MRONJ diagnosis; past medical history; indication for antiresorptive or antiangiogenic therapy; type of antiresorptive medication; local risk factor for MRONJ; MRONJ Stage; anatomic location and symptoms; treatment; surgical complications; recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 537 patients (375 females, 162 males) with MRONJ were included. Statistically significant associations were found between patients with metastatic bone disease and recurrences (P < 0.0005) and between advanced MRONJ stages (stages 2 and 3) and recurrences (P < 0.005). Statistically significant associations were also found between male gender and recurrences (P < 0.05), and between MRONJ maxillary sites and recurrences (P < 0.0000005). CONCLUSIONS: A longer mean duration of antiresorptive medications before MRONJ onset was observed in patients affected by osteoporosis, whereas a shorter mean duration was observed in all metastatic bone cancer patients, and in particular in those affected by prostate cancer with bone metastases or multiple myeloma. Surgery plays an important role for the management of MRONJ lesions.

2.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 547, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730315

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antiresorptive therapy (AR) disrupts osseous homeostasis and can induce direct irritation over the gastrointestinal mucosa; however, its possible erosive effects on the oral epithelium have not been totally described. Among the most frequent oral erosive lesions, oral lichen planus (OLP) frequently presents as painful mucosal ulcerations, arising from basal membrane inflammatory damage. Thus, the aim of this retrospective study was to describe the association between AR and the incidence of OLP. METHODS: This case-control study included data from 148 patients (17 patients undergoing AR therapy (AR group) / 131 without AR therapy (Control group)). Each patient record was systematically processed and the association between AR drugs and OLP clinical characteristics within both groups was assessed. RESULTS: The erosive form of OLP was significantly more frequent in the AR group than in the Control group (p = 0.029). Indeed, the AR treatment using alendronic acid (41.2%) was the most frequently reported. Additionally, the erosive form of OLP showed the strongest association with pain and burning sensation among the OLP types (p < 0.050). However, disease worsening and AR consumption were not significantly associated (p = 0.150). CONCLUSIONS: Patients under AR therapy show more clinical symptoms associated to the erosive type of OLP. Regardless of the AR therapy, the erosive type of OLP is associated with more severe symptoms.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Lichen Planus, Oral , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Case-Control Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Prevalence , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Alendronate/therapeutic use , Alendronate/adverse effects
3.
Cureus ; 16(3): e55482, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571848

ABSTRACT

Background Dental implants have become a widespread treatment option for replacing missing teeth. Adequate bone is required for the placement of dental implants, in the absence of which, augmentation by bone regeneration is done. Antiresorptive drugs are used as treatment procedures for bone regeneration. One such antiresorptive drug is simvastatin (SV), a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme used to manage hyperlipidemia. It reduces serum cholesterol levels and has an advantageous effect on new bone formation. Various studies establish that SV stimulates bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 expression and leads to bone formation. SV prevents the production of isoprenoids and mevalonate, which are essential for osteoclastogenesis and contribute to the bone-sparing effect.  Aim The aim of the study was to investigate the osteoregenerative activity of SV in the osteoblast-like cell models, MG-63 cell line, with hyperglycemic conditions. Methodology MG-63 cultures were established under high glucose concentrations during the experiments and cultured with SV concentrations of 1 µM and 3 µM. The quantification of the expression of the genes, namely, BMP-2 and osteocalcin (OCN) was done by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RTqPCR). The measurement of alkaline phosphatase activity in the SV-treated cells was also determined. Results According to the results of the study, SV had osteoprotective properties resulting from the inhibition of osteoclast stimulation and osteoinductive properties, facilitated by BMP-2 and OCN. In addition, SV at concentrations of 1 µM and 3 µM increased the gene expression of BMP-2 and OCN in the MG-63 cell line. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrated that SV had a significant and direct effect on osteogenesis in osteoblasts in vitro.

4.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 7914, 2024 04 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575664

ABSTRACT

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious adverse reaction associated with antiresorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates and denosumab. When dealing with advanced and/or multiple MRONJ lesions undergoing surgical therapy, the extent of surgery is often a topic of discussion. The aim of this study was to identify the differences in bone density in and around the MRONJ lesion before and after surgical treatment to evaluate the needed surgical extend of the modelling osteotomy. In this retrospective study 26 patients with MRONJ lesions that were surgically treated in our department were observed. Length, width and bone density were measured in panoramic radiograph pre and postoperatively with the Imaging processing software Sidexis and ImageJ (Fiji). The necrotic area, the surrounding sclerotic area as well as the healthy contralateral side were observed. Measurements were performed by two independent observers. Pearson correlation was calculated to determine the interobserver variability. Bone density was significantly reduced in the necrotic bone area compared to the healthy unaffected contralateral reference side. The sclerotic bone area surrounding the necrosis showed increased bone density compared to the contralateral unaffected reference side. The density of the sclerotic bone area was increased in the previously affected MRONJ area in the postoperative panoramic radiograph. The pre and postoperative density showed no significant correlation to healing behaviour. The focus of the modelling osteotomy in surgical treatment of mature MRONJ lesions should be predominantly on the parts that appear necrotic and less dense in the panoramic radiograph as sclerotic areas might be an expression of bone reaction.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteonecrosis , Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/surgery , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/drug therapy , Denosumab/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/diagnostic imaging , Osteonecrosis/surgery , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Necrosis/chemically induced
5.
J Bone Miner Metab ; 41(5): 727-737, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37432542

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown that an impaired bone condition, represented by osteoporosis and increased fracture risk, may potentially aggravate periodontal disease and, consequently, the risk of tooth loss. This 5-year prospective study aimed to investigate whether systemic bone condition represents risk factor for tooth loss due to periodontal disease amongst elderly women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-four participants, aged ≥ 65 years, who attended the 5-years recall for periodontal evaluation were involved. Baseline exposures were osteoporosis and fracture risk probabilities (FRAX). Women were grouped according to bone mineral density (BMD) and years of bone treatment for osteoporosis. The primary outcome at a 5-year follow-up was the number of tooth loss due to periodontal disease. Periodontitis staging and grading, and causes of tooth loss were recorded. RESULTS: The multivariate Poisson regression models showed that women with untreated/shortly treated osteoporosis were 4 times more likely to present higher number of tooth loss due to periodontal disease than those with normal BMD or treated for ≥ 3 years (risk ratio (RR) = 4.00, 95% CI 1.40-11.27). Higher FRAX was also linked to tooth loss (RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve suggested that women with history of ≥ 1 tooth losses have higher chances of worse major FRAX (sensitivity = 72.2%; specificity = 72.2%). CONCLUSION: In this 5-year study, higher FRAX and untreated osteoporosis were risk factors for tooth loss. Women with normal BMD or treated for osteoporosis for ≥ 3 years did not show increased risk. Management of skeletal conditions should be emphasized with periodontal care for the prevention of tooth loss in elderly women.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Periodontal Diseases , Tooth Loss , Aged , Female , Humans , Tooth Loss/complications , Tooth Loss/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/complications , Bone Density , Fractures, Bone/complications , Risk Factors , Periodontal Diseases/complications , Risk Assessment , Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology , Absorptiometry, Photon
6.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(5)2023 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37241200

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: Although it is very uncommon, medication-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw (also known as MRONJ) can have serious consequences. Traditionally, this adverse event has been recognised in patients who were treated with bisphosphonate (BP) drugs. Nevertheless, in recent years, it has been established that individuals having treatment with various types of medications, such as a receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand inhibitor (denosumab) and antiangiogenic agents, have had the same issue. The purpose of this research is to determine if the application of human amniotic membrane (hAM) may be used as a therapy for MRONJ. Material and Methods: A multi-source database (MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, and CENTRAL) systematic search was performed. The major objective of this study is to obtain an understanding of the efficacy of hAM when it is employed as a treatment modality for MRONJ. The protocol of this review was registered in the INPLASY register under the number NPLASY202330010. Results: The authors were able to include a total of five studies for the quality analysis, whereas for the quantity evaluation, only four studies were eligible. A total of 91 patients were considered for the investigation. After treatment with human amniotic membrane (hAM), a recurrence of osteonecrosis was observed in n = 6 cases (8.8%). The combined efficacy of surgical therapy and the use of hAM resulted in an overall success rate of 91.2%. Intraoperative complications were only documented in one article, and they were mostly caused by the positioning of the hAM, which led to wound breakdown at the surgical site. Conclusions: Based on the small amount of data and low-quality research included in this study, using human amniotic membranes to treat MRONJ might represent a feasible option. Nevertheless, further studies with a wider patient population are required to understand the long-term impacts.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/surgery , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/epidemiology , Amnion , Denosumab/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects
7.
J Clin Med ; 12(9)2023 May 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37176741

ABSTRACT

In the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and more generally of neoplastic and metabolic pathologies affecting bone tissues, antiresorption drugs such as bisphosphonates and monoclonal antibody are used. Bisphosphonates have been linked to cases of osteonecrosis of the jaws since 2003 by Marx, with more and more evidence over the next two decades; together with bisphosphonate drugs, cases relating to the use of monoclonal drugs have been subsequently added. Among the main independent risk factors, we have extraction procedures in oral surgery that can affect both the mandible and the maxilla and the anterior or posterior sectors. The incidence of MRONJ treated with oral bisphosphonates ranges from 0.5% to 3% according to studies; this incidence would appear to be higher in patients treated with antiresorptive agents with neoplastic diseases. Many pathologies including those in which antiresorptive drugs are used show differences in prevalence in relation to sex; similarly, there could be differences in the incidence of cases of osteonecrosis based on gender in patients undergoing dentoalveolar surgery. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and trial sequential analysis was to identify and quantify whether there is a proportionally greater risk of MRONJ in male or female subjects and whether there is evidence of greater involvement of osteonecrosis at several extraction sites, differentiating them into mandibular or maxilla and in the anterior or posterior sector. The revision protocol followed the indications of the Cochrane Handbook, and were recorded in Prospero, while the drafting of the manuscript was based on PRISMA. The results of the systematic review, after the study identification and selection process, included a total of 24 studies. The results of the meta-analysis reports: odds ratio (random effects model): 1.476 (0.684, 3.184) between male and female; odds ratio (random effects model): 1.390 (0.801, 2.412) between mandible and maxillary, and an odds ratio value of 0.730 (0.250, 2.137) between the anterior and posterior extraction sites. In conclusion, we can see that there was a trend in the onset of MRONJ as a complication of dentoalveolar surgical procedures, which proportionally mostly involved the male sex and the posterior mandibular sectors, however, this trend must be further confirmed by additional studies.

8.
Arch Endocrinol Metab ; 67(4): e000612, 2023 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37252700

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to report the experience of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) in osteoporotic patients for nine years, and their associated initiating factors. Materials and methods: The numbers of invasive oral procedures (IOP) (tooth extraction, dental implant placement, and periodontal procedures) and removable prostheses performed from January 2012 to January 2021 were obtained from the digital records of a large public dental center. There were an estimated 6,742 procedures performed in patients under osteoporosis treatment. Results: Two cases (0.03%) of MRONJ were registered in nine years amongst patients with osteoporosis who had dental treatment at the center. From the 1,568 tooth extractions, one patient (0.06%) developed MRONJ. There was also one case from the 2,139 removable prostheses delivered (0.05%). Conclusion: The prevalence of MRONJ associated with osteoporosis treatment was very low. The protocols adopted seem to be adequate for the prevention of this complication. The findings of this study reinforce the rare frequency of MRONJ associated with dental procedures in patients submitted to the pharmacological management of osteoporosis. An integral analysis of systemic risk factors and oral preventive strategies may be considered regularly in the dental treatment of these patients.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteoporosis , Humans , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/epidemiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/complications , Jaw
9.
Biochem Pharmacol ; 213: 115584, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37148979

ABSTRACT

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetically heterogeneous connective tissue disorder characterized by bone fragility and different extra-skeletal manifestations. The severity of these manifestations makes it possible to classify OI into different subtypes based on the main clinical features. This review aims to outline and describe the current pharmacological alternatives for treating OI, grounded on clinical and preclinical reports, such as antiresorptive agents, anabolic agents, growth hormone, and anti-TGFß antibody, among other less used agents. The different options and their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties will be reviewed and discussed, focusing on the variability of their response and the molecular mechanisms involved to attain the main clinical goals, which include decreasing fracture incidence, improving pain, and promoting growth, mobility, and functional independence.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Fractures, Bone , Osteogenesis Imperfecta , Humans , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/drug therapy , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36901300

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to examine how the composition and properties of saliva change in people with osteoporosis who have received antiresorptive (AR) treatment, compared to patients with osteoporosis who have not yet received this treatment. METHODS: The study population consisted of 38 patients with osteoporosis using AR drugs (Group I) and 16 patients with osteoporosis who had never used AR drugs (Group II). The control group consisted of 32 people without osteoporosis. Laboratory tests included determination of pH and concentrations of Ca, PO4, total protein, lactoferrin, lysozyme, sIgA, IgA, cortisol, neopterin, activity of amylase at rest, and stimulated saliva. The buffering capacity of stimulated saliva was also determined. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the saliva of Group I and Group II. No statistically significant correlation was found between the amount of time using AR therapy (Group I) and the tested parameters of the saliva. Significant differences were found between Group I and the control group. The concentrations of PO4, lysozyme, and cortisol were higher, while concentrations of Ca ions, sIgA, and neopterin were lower, in comparison to the control group. The significant differences between Group II and the control group were smaller, and they concerned only the concentrations of lysozyme, cortisol, and neopterin. CONCLUSIONS: The saliva of people with osteoporosis subjected to AR therapy and those not subjected to AR therapy did not show statistically significant differences in terms of the examined parameters of the saliva. However, the saliva of patients with osteoporosis taking and not taking AR drugs was significantly different compared to the saliva of the control group.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteoporosis , Humans , Saliva/chemistry , Muramidase , Hydrocortisone/analysis , Neopterin/analysis , Neopterin/metabolism , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Immunoglobulin A, Secretory/analysis
12.
Orthopadie (Heidelb) ; 52(3): 246-258, 2023 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36806953

ABSTRACT

Osteoporosis is the most common systemic skeletal disease worldwide. Its consequences have a substantial impact on the quality of life of patients and increases the overall morbidity and mortality. Standardized diagnostic procedures and treatment recommendations have been available for years as German and international (S3) guidelines. Nevertheless, there is a considerable gap in the diagnosis and adequate treatment of osteoporosis, especially in Germany. The aim is to detect the disease at an early stage and to establish a specific and consistent treatment of osteoporosis. In this way the quality of life and independence of those affected can be maintained over a long period. In the acute and permanent treatment of manifest osteoporosis, surgeons, orthopedic and trauma surgeons play a key role.


Subject(s)
Orthopedics , Osteoporosis , Humans , Quality of Life , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Germany
13.
Osteoporos Int ; 34(4): 703-711, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36715715

ABSTRACT

We assessed if antiresorptive treatment can prevent aromatase inhibitor-induced bone loss in patients with early breast cancer. We observed that patients who did not receive antiresorptive treatment had a 20.8-fold increase in risk of bone loss after 24 months of aromatase inhibitors therapy. PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe changes in femoral and lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) after 24 months of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and antiresorptive treatment in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. METHODS: Prospective, longitudinal study in a real-life setting with a 2-year follow-up. Patients underwent a complete baseline bone assessment including clinical assessment, biological evaluation, BMD measurement, and spine X-ray. Antiresorptive treatment was prescribed to patients with a T-score < - 2 or a T-score < - 1.5 SD with additional osteoporosis risk factors. A follow-up bone assessment was carried out after 24 months. RESULTS: Among 328 patients referred to our center, 168 patients (67.7 ± 10.6 years) were included in our study, and 144 were eligible for antiresorptive treatment. After 24 months, patients receiving antiresorptive treatment experienced a significant increase of + 6.28% in femoral-BMD (F-BMD) and + 7.79% in lumbar-BMD (L-BMD). This increase was not significantly different between osteoporotic and osteopenic patients. Conversely, patients not receiving antiresorptive treatment presented significant F-BMD and L-BMD loss regardless of the baseline BMD. In the multivariate logistic model, the lack of antiresorptive treatment was the only predictive factor for major femoral bone loss with a 20.83 odds ratio (CI95%:4.2-100, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This real-life study confirmed that antiresorptive treatment significantly increases femoral and lumbar BMD regardless of the baseline BMD in postmenopausal patients receiving AIs for early breast cancer. Patients who did not receive antiresorptive treatment had a 20.8-fold increased risk of major bone loss. Nevertheless, the best threshold to adopt for starting antiresorptive agents remains undetermined.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Aromatase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Postmenopause , Longitudinal Studies , Prospective Studies , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density
14.
J Oral Implantol ; 49(1): 39-45, 2023 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35446931

ABSTRACT

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious concern for dentists as well as maxillofacial surgeons. Therefore, the safety of dental implant placement in patient receiving antiresorptive drugs (ARDs) has been the subject of controversial debate for several years and remains a source of uncertainty for surgeons and patients. This consecutive case series assessed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of dental implants placed in patients under antiresorptive therapy. Patients who received at least one dental implant at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany, between 2010 and 2019 with a history of current or past antiresorptive medication were included the study. The main outcomes were occurrence of MRONJ, implant success, and survival rate. A total of 16 patients were treated with 39 implants. No implant loss or MRONJ occurred in the respective patients. The reasons for antiresorptive intake were osteoporosis, malignancy, edema of bone marrow, or diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO). MRONJ occurred neither around implants nor in other locations. Cumulative implant success was 92.6% (25 of 27). No subjective complaints or postoperative complications were documented. Mean bone loss was 0.60 ± 0.98 mm. The prevalence of peri-implantitis was 30% on patient level and 29.6% on implant level. None of the patients had failed implants. No major complications after implant placement under antiresorptives could be detected. As long as implant surgery follows a specific protocol, implant placement in patients treated with antiresorptive therapy seems to be safe and predictable.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Dental Implants , Peri-Implantitis , Humans , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Peri-Implantitis/diagnostic imaging , Peri-Implantitis/drug therapy
15.
Oral Dis ; 29(7): 2799-2805, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36403223

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the association between endodontic treatment failure and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in a cohort of oncologic patients in therapy with antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were selected as affected by MRONJ in absence of the common local risk factors (oral surgical procedures or ill-fitting dentures) but showing failure of previous endodontic treatment performed at least 6 months before the starting of antiresorptive/antiangiogenic therapies. Jaw lesions were all surgically treated and patients underwent a strict clinical and radiological follow-up. RESULTS: Among 18 patients, who developed 18 MRONJ, the only detectable local risk factor was the presence of teeth with failed endodontic treatment (more precisely, root canal underfilling in eight cases, root canal overfilling in two cases, root perforation in three cases, root fracture in five cases). All patients completely healed after surgical procedure and no recurrence was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Endodontic treatment failure should be considered a local risk factor for MRONJ development in oncologic patients. For such reason, it is mandatory to carefully evaluate them prior than the beginning of antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs administration.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Humans , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/surgery , Risk Factors , Dental Care
16.
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 67(4): e000612, Mar.-Apr. 2023. tab
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1439227

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to report the experience of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) in osteoporotic patients for nine years, and their associated initiating factors. Materials and methods: The numbers of invasive oral procedures (IOP) (tooth extraction, dental implant placement, and periodontal procedures) and removable prostheses performed from January 2012 to January 2021 were obtained from the digital records of a large public dental center. There were an estimated 6,742 procedures performed in patients under osteoporosis treatment. Results: Two cases (0.03%) of MRONJ were registered in nine years amongst patients with osteoporosis who had dental treatment at the center. From the 1,568 tooth extractions, one patient (0.06%) developed MRONJ. There was also one case from the 2,139 removable prostheses delivered (0.05%). Conclusions: The prevalence of MRONJ associated with osteoporosis treatment was very low. The protocols adopted seem to be adequate for the prevention of this complication. The findings of this study reinforce the rare frequency of MRONJ associated with dental procedures in patients submitted to the pharmacological management of osteoporosis. An integral analysis of systemic risk factors and oral preventive strategies may be considered regularly in the dental treatment of these patients.

17.
Front Pharmacol ; 13: 1017391, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36339548

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aims to explore the risk signals of osteonecrosis of the jaw induced by antiresorptive drugs and provide references for the clinical safety application. Method: According to the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), from January 2004 to September 2021, we chose "Osteonecrosis of the jaw (10064658)" and "Exposed bone in jaw (10071014)" as preferred terms, "antiresorptive drugs" as the target drugs, and primary suspect drug as the drug role code in the dataset. We evaluated the association between drugs and adverse events by using reporting odds ratio (ROR) based on disproportionality analysis. We took the High-Level Terms (HLT) of MedDRA® as the classification level of indications to calculate ROR to compare the signal difference of ONJ in different indications. In addition, patients with antiresorptive-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw and the time of onset of the condition following different antiresorptive medications were collected for the study. Results: The FAERS contained 18,421 reports relating to jaw osteonecrosis from January 2004 to September 2021. A total of eight antiresorptive agents were included in the analysis. From high to low, the ROR of ONJ induced by antiresorptive agents (regardless of indication) is pamidronate (ROR = 494.8), zoledronic acid (ROR = 431.9), denosumab (ROR = 194.8), alendronate (ROR = 151.2), risedronate (ROR = 140.2), etidronic acid (ROR = 64.5), ibandronate (ROR = 40.8), and romosozumab (ROR = 6.4). HLT ROR values for "metabolic bone disorders" were the lowest for each drug, while HLT ROR values were high for "tumor-related indications," including breast and nipple neoplasms malignant, plasma cell myelomas, and prostatic neoplasms malignant. The onset time for osteonecrosis of the jaw as median (Q1, Q3), osteoporosis-related indications, and the onset time for ONJ were 730 (368, 1268), 489.5 (236.3, 909.8), 722.5 (314, 1055), 761 (368, 1720), and 153 (50, 346) for zoledronic acid, denosumab, ibandronate, risedronate, and romosozumab, respectively. Cancer-related indications: the onset time for ONJ were 680.5 (255.3, 1283), 488 (245, 851), and 696.5 (347, 1087) for zoledronic acid, denosumab, and pamidronate, respectively. Conclusion: When antiresorptive drugs are used for metastasis, they have the largest risk signal, followed by malignancy, and the smallest is osteoporosis. The onset time of ONJ may not be related to the indications. The onset time of ONJ for BPs was about 2 years, denosumab about 1.3 years, and romosozumab less than 1 year, which may be related to sequential treatment. When used according to the instructions, the risk of ONJ caused by denosumab was higher than that of zoledronic acid, regardless of the indication. Based on these findings, researchers will continue to monitor and identify risk factors.

18.
Z Gerontol Geriatr ; 55(8): 703-714, 2022 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36445487

ABSTRACT

Osteoporosis is the most common systemic skeletal disease worldwide. Its consequences have a substantial impact on the quality of life of patients and increases the overall morbidity and mortality. Standardized diagnostic procedures and treatment recommendations have been available for years as German and international (S3) guidelines. Nevertheless, there is a considerable gap in the diagnosis and adequate treatment of osteoporosis, especially in Germany. The aim is to detect the disease at an early stage and to establish a specific and consistent treatment of osteoporosis. In this way the quality of life and independence of those affected can be maintained over a long period. In the acute and permanent treatment of manifest osteoporosis, surgeons, orthopedic and trauma surgeons play a key role.


Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Humans , Germany
19.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 222(7): 432-439, ago. - sept. 2022. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-207427

ABSTRACT

Esta versión actualizada de las guías de osteoporosis de la Sociedad Española de Investigación en Osteoporosis y Metabolismo Mineral (SEIOMM) incorpora la información más relevante publicada en los últimos 7años, desde las guías de 2015, con estudios de imagen, como la valoración de la fractura vertebral y el análisis del índice trabecular óseo. Además, los avances terapéuticos incluyen los nuevos fármacos anabólicos, los estudios comparativos de la eficacia de los fármacos y la terapia secuencial y combinada. Por ello se actualizan también las recomendaciones de los tratamientos (AU)


This updated version of the Spanish Society for Research in Osteoporosis and Mineral Metabolism (SEIOMM) osteoporosis guides incorporate the most relevant information published in the last 7years, since the 2015 guides, with imaging studies, such as vertebral fracture assessment and bone trabecular score analysis. In addition, therapeutic advances include new anabolic agents, comparative studies of drug efficacy, and sequential and combined therapy. Therefore, therapeutic algorithms are also updated (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures , Bone Density , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Societies, Medical , Spain
20.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 222(7): 432-439, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35676194

ABSTRACT

This updated version of the Spanish Society for Research in Osteoporosis and Mineral Metabolism (SEIOMM) osteoporosis guides incorporate the most relevant information published in the last 7 years, since the 2015 guides, with imaging studies, such as vertebral fracture assessment and bone trabecular score analysis. In addition, therapeutic advances include new anabolic agents, comparative studies of drug efficacy, and sequential and combined therapy. Therefore, therapeutic algorithms are also updated.


Subject(s)
Bone Density , Osteoporosis , Bone and Bones , Humans , Male , Minerals/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Postmenopause
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...