Effects of electron density force to 1.0 and fill to 1.0 on VMAT treatment plans for lung SBRT.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of forcing and filling the electron density (ED) to 1.0 of the planning target volume (PTV) overdose distribution in lung SBRT treatment leading to shortening patient treatment time and increasing patient comfort by reducing MU/fraction due to ED manipulation effect. METHODS: In this study, 36 lung SBRT plans of 12 suitable patients who prescribed a total dose of 50 Gy in five fractions were generated with Monaco v.5.10 TPS using the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique by PTV ED values forcing as well as filling to 1.0 and comparatively assessed. The first group of plans was created by using the patient's original ED, second and third groups of plans were reoptimized by forcing and filling the ED of PTV to 1.0, respectively, therefore acquiring a new dose distribution which lead to comparatively assessment the effects of changes in ED on PTV and OAR doses. RESULTS: Assessment of treatment plans revealed that mean MU/fx numbers were decreased by 76% and 75.25% between Groups 1 and 2, Groups 1 and 3, respectively. The number of segments was also reduced in Group 1 by up to 15% compared with Groups 2 and 3. Maximum HI and CI differences for PTV between Groups 1 and 2 were less than 1% and Groups 1 and 3 were 1.5% which indicates all 3 group plans were comparable in terms of dose distribution within PTV. CONCLUSIONS: Forcing and filling the ED of PTV to 1.0 strategy has provided reduced a number of segments and MU/fx without a significant change in PTV mean and maximum doses, thereby decreasing treatment time and patient discomfort during treatment. This process should be considered in line of a potential number of patients as well as prescribed dose and MU/fx numbers.

Optimum delineation of skin structure for dose calculation with the linear Boltzmann transport equation algorithm in radiotherapy treatment planning.

This study investigated the effectiveness of placing skin-ring structures to enhance the precision of skin dose calculations in patients who had undergone head and neck volumetric modulated arc therapy using the Acuros XB algorithm. The skin-ring structures in question were positioned 2 mm below the skin surface (skin A) and 1 mm above and below the skin surface (skin B) within the treatment-planning system. These structures were then tested on both acrylic cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms and compared with the Gafchromic EBT3 film (EBT3). The results revealed that the maximum dose differences between skins A and B for the cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms were approximately 12% and 2%, respectively. In patients 1 and 2, the dose differences between skins A and B were 9.2% and 8.2%, respectively. Ultimately, demonstrated that the skin-dose calculation accuracy of skin B was within 2% and did not impact the deep organs.

Evaluation of the toxicity of prophylactic extended-field radiation therapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy in combination with concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced stage IIIC1r cervical cancer according to the 2018 FIGO classification.

Background: To evaluate the toxicity of prophylactic extended-field radiation therapy (EFRT) combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in combination with cisplatin chemotherapy for locally advanced stage IIIC1r cervical cancer [2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)]. Materials and methods: Thirty patients with stage IIIC1r cervical cancer were treated with EFRT combined with concurrent cisplatin. Acute toxicities were evaluated according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v.5). Delayed toxicities were evaluated according to the classification criteria of radiation damage toxicity of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The efficacy of the regimens was evaluated using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST v1.1). Spearman correlation was used to analyze the correlation between acute gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea) and the small bowel V45. Predictive value analysis was performed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: There were no grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities. The most common acute toxicity observed was nausea (grade 2 in 40%), which was positively correlated with the volume of the small intestine receiving 45 Gy. When the V45 of the small intestine was > 83.2 cc, the risk of grade 2 acute upper digestive tract toxicity (nausea) increased. The major late toxicities had the following distributions: Grade 1 diarrhea, 36.7%; Grade 1 abdominal pain, 13.3%; and Grade 1 radiation cystitis. No grade ≥ 2 late toxicities were observed. Conclusions: Treatment of locally advanced stage IIIC1r cervical cancer with EFRT combined with VMAT and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy was well tolerated, and the acute toxicity profile was acceptable. Significant grade 3 acute/delayed toxicities were not observed.

Radiobiological analysis of VMAT treatment plan with flattened and flattening filter free photon beam: an EUD and TCP based comparative study.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric and radiobiological differences between 6MV flattened filter (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF) using volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) technique for head and neck (H&N) cancer patients. Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with H&N carcinoma were selected and treated with VMAT with FF (VMATFF) treatment plan. Retrospectively, additional VMAT treatment plans were developed using FFF beams (VMATFFF). Radiobiological parameters, such as equivalent uniform dose (EUD), tumor cure probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), were calculated using Niemierko's model for both VMATFF and VMATFFF. Correlation between dosimetric and radiobiological data were analyzed and compared. Results: The conformity index (CI) was 0.975 ± 0.014 (VMATFF) and 0.964 ± 0. 019 (VMATFFF) with p ≥ 0.05. Statistically, there was an insignificant difference in the planning target volume (PTV) results for TCP (%) values, with values of 81.20 ± 0.88% (VMATFF) and 81.01 ± 0.92 (%) (VMATFF). Similarly, there was an insignificant difference in the EUD (Gy) values, which were 71.53 ± 0.33 Gy (VMATFF) and 71.46 ± 0.34 Gy (VMATFFF). The NTCP values for the spinal cord, left parotid, and right parotid were 6.54 × 10-07%, 8.04%, and 7.69%, respectively, in the case of VMATFF. For VMATFFF, the corresponding NTCP values for the spinal cord, parotids left, and parotid right were 3.09 × 10-07%, 6.57%, and 6.73%, respectively. Conclusion: The EUD and Mean Dose to PTV were strongly correlated for VMATFFF. An increased mean dose to the PTV and greater TCP were reported for the VMATFF, which can enhance the delivery of the therapeutic dose to the target.

Consideration of Optimal Evaluation Metrics for Internal Gross Tumor Dose Relevant to Tumor Response in Multi-fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis.

Introduction In stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastasis (BM), the target dose inhomogeneity remains highly variable among modalities, irradiation techniques, and facilities, which can affect tumor response during and after multi-fraction SRS. Volumetric-modulated arcs (VMAs) can provide a concentrically-layered steep dose increase inside a gross tumor volume (GTV) boundary compared to dynamic conformal arcs. This study was conducted to review the optimal evaluation method for the internal GTV doses relevant to maximal response and local control, specifically to examine the significance of the doses 2 mm and 4 mm inside the GTV boundary in VMA-based SRS. Materials and methods This was a planning study for the clinical scenario of a single BM and targeted 25 GTVs of >0.50 cc, including eight spherical models with diameters of 10-45 mm and 17 clinical BMs (GTV: 0.72-44.33 cc). SRS plans were generated for each GTV using VMA with a 5-mm leaf-width multileaf collimator and the optimization that prioritized the steepness of the dose gradient outside the GTV boundary without any internal dose constraints. The dose prescription and evaluation were based on the GTV D V-0.01 cc, a minimum dose of GTV minus 0.01 cc. Two planning systems were compared for the GTV - 2 mm and GTV - 4 mm structures that were generated by equally reducing 2 mm and 4 mm from the GTV surface. The D eIIVs, a minimum dose of the irradiated isodose volume equivalent to the GTV - 2 mm and GTV - 4 mm, were compared to other common metrics. Results The GTV - 2 mm and GTV - 4 mm volumes differed significantly between the systems. In the spherical GTVs, the irradiated isodose surfaces of GTV D 80% and D 50% corresponded to 0.4-1.6 mm (<2 mm) and 1.0-4.6 mm inside the GTV boundary, respectively. In the 25 GTVs, the GTV - 2 mm coverage with the D eIIV varied from 83.7% to 98.2% (95-98% in 68% of the cases), while the GTV coverage with the GTV - 2 mm D eIIV was 20.2-75.9%. In the 23 GTVs of ≥1.26 cc, the GTV coverage with the GTV - 4 mm D eIIV varied from 1.9% to 55.6% (<50% in 87% of the cases). No significant difference was observed between the GTV D 50% and the GTV - 2 mm D eIIV, while the GTV - 4 mm D eIIV was significantly higher than the GTV D 50%. No significant correlations were observed between the GTV D 50% and the D eIIVs of the GTV - 2 mm and GTV - 4 mm. Conclusions The doses 2 mm and 4 mm inside a GTV have low correlations with the GTV D 50% and may be more relevant to maximal response and local control for SRS of BM. The D eIIV instead of the minimum dose of a fixed % coverage (e.g. D 98%) is suitable for reporting the doses 2 mm and 4 mm inside the GTV boundary in terms of avoiding the over- or under-coverage, with consideration to substantial variability in minus margin addition functions among planning systems. In VMA-based SRS with a steep dose gradient, the doses 2-4 mm inside a GTV decrease significantly as the GTV increases, which can attenuate the excessive dose exposure to the surrounding brain in a large BM due to the GTV shrinkage during multi-fraction SRS.

Quantification of Treatment Plan Deliverability in Breast Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy With Agility Multi-leaf Collimator.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim was to assess the complexity of breast volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using various indices and to evaluate their performance through gamma analysis in predicting plan deliverability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 285 VMAT plans for 260 patients were created using the VersaHD™ linear accelerator with a Monaco treatment planning system. Corresponding verification plans were generated using the ArcCHECK® detector, and gamma analysis was conducted employing various criteria. Twenty-eight plan complexity metrics were computed, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were determined between the gamma passing rate (GPR) and these metrics. RESULTS: The average GPR values for all plans were 97.7%, 89.9%, and 78.0% for the 2 mm/2%, 1 mm/2%, and 1 mm/1% criteria, respectively. While most complexity metrics exhibited weak correlations with GPRs under the 2 mm/2% criterion, leaf sequence variability (LSV), plan-averaged beam area (PA), converted area metric (CAM), and edge area metric (EAM) demonstrated the most robust performance, with Pearson's correlation coefficients of 0.57, 0.50, -0.70, and -0.56, respectively. CONCLUSION: Metrics related to beam aperture size and irregularity, such as LSV, PA, CAM and EAM, proved to be reasonable predictors of plan deliverability in breast VMAT.

Deep learning for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy: Prediction accuracy and cost-sensitive classification performance.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a deep learning model's performance in predicting and classifying patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) results for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), aiming to streamline PSQA workflows and reduce the onsite measurement workload. METHODS: A total of 761 VMAT plans were analyzed using 3D-MResNet to process multileaf collimator images and monitor unit data, with the gamma passing rate (GPR) as the output. Thresholds for the predicted GPR (Th-p) and measured GPR (Th-m) were established to aid in PSQA decision-making, using cost curves and error rates to assess classification performance. RESULTS: The mean absolute errors of the model for the test set were 1.63 % and 2.38 % at 3 %/2 mm and 2 %/2 mm, respectively. For the classification of the PSQA results, Th-m was 88.3 % at 2 %/2 mm and 93.3 % at 3 %/2 mm. The lowest cost-sensitive error rates of 0.0127 and 0.0925 were obtained when Th-p was set as 91.2 % at 2 %/2 mm and 96.4 % at 3 %/2 mm, respectively. Additionally, the 2 %/2 mm classifier also achieved a lower total expected cost of 0.069 compared with 0.110 for the 3 %/2 mm classifier. The deep learning classifier under the 2 %/2 mm gamma criterion had a sensitivity and specificity of 100 % (10/10) and 83.5 % (167/200), respectively, for the test set. CONCLUSIONS: The developed 3D-MResNet model can accurately predict and classify PSQA results based on VMAT plans. The introduction of a deep learning model into the PSQA workflow has considerable potential for improving the VMAT PSQA process and reducing workloads.

Evaluation of the Minimum Segment Width and Fluence Smoothing Tools for Intensity-modulated Techniques in Monaco Treatment Planning System.

Purpose: This study aims to minimize monitor units (MUs) of intensity-modulated treatments in the Monaco treatment planning system while preserving plan quality by optimizing the "Minimum Segment Width" (MSW) and "Fluence Smoothing" parameters. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 30 prostate, 30 gynecological, 15 breast cancer, 10 head and neck tumor, 11 radiosurgery, and 10 hypo-fractionated plans. Original prostate plans employed "Fluence Smoothing" = Off and were reoptimized with Low, Medium, and High settings. The remaining pathologies initially used MSW = 0.5 cm and were reoptimized with MSW = 1.0 cm. Plan quality, including total MU, delivery time, and dosimetric constraints, was statistically analyzed with a paired t-test. Results: Prostate plans exhibited the highest MU variation when changing "Fluence Smoothing" from Off to High (average ΔMU = -5.1%; P < 0.001). However, a High setting may increase overall MU when MSW = 0.5 cm. Gynecological plans changed substantially when MSW increased from 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm (average ΔMU = -29%; P < 0.001). Organs at risk sparing and planning target volumes remained within 1.2% differences. Replanning other pathologies with MSW = 1.0 cm affected breast and head and neck tumor plans (average ΔMU = -168.38, average Δt = -11.74 s, and average ΔMU = -256.56, average Δt = -15.05 s, respectively; all with P < 0.004). Radiosurgery and hypofractioned highly modulated plans did not yield statistically significant results. Conclusions: In breast, pelvis, head and neck, and prostate plans, starting with MSW = 1.0 cm optimally reduces MU and treatment time without compromising plan quality. MSW has a greater impact on MU than the "Fluence Smoothing" parameter. Plans with high modulation might present divergent behavior, requiring a case-specific analysis with MSW values higher than 0.5 cm.

Modeling of Gamma Index for Prediction of Pretreatment Quality Assurance in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of the Liver.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model to evaluate pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) based on treatment planning parameters for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver carcinoma. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively selected 180 cases of liver SBRT treated using the volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. Numerous parameters defining the plan complexity were calculated from the DICOM-RP (Radiotherapy Plan) file using an in-house program developed in MATLAB. Patient-specific QA was performed with global gamma evaluation criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm in a relative mode using the Octavius two-dimensional detector array. Various statistical tests and multivariate predictive models were evaluated. Results: The leaf speed (MILS) and planning target volume size showed the highest correlation with the gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm (P < 0.05). Degree of modulation (DoM), MCSSPORT, leaf speed (MILS), and gantry speed (MIGS) were predictors of global gamma pass rate (GPR) for 2%/2 mm (G22), whereas DoM, MCSSPORT, leaf speed (MILS) and robust decision making were predictors of the global GPR criterion of 3%/3 mm (G33). The variance inflation factor values of all predictors were <2, indicating that the data were not associated with each other. For the G22 prediction, the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 75.0% and 75.0%, respectively, whereas, for G33 prediction, the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 74.9% and 85.7%%, respectively. Conclusions: The model was potentially beneficial as an easy alternative to pretreatment QA in predicting the uncertainty in plan deliverability at the planning stage and could help reduce resources in busy clinics.

Dosimetric effect of collimator rotation on intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for rectal cancer radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are the main radiotherapy techniques for treating and managing rectal cancer. Collimator rotation is one of the crucial parameters in radiotherapy planning, and its alteration can cause dosimetric variations. This study assessed the effect of collimator rotation on the dosimetric results of various IMRT and VMAT plans for rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of 20 male patients with rectal cancer were utilized for IMRT and VMAT treatment planning with various collimator angles. Nine different IMRT techniques (5, 7, and 9 coplanar fields with collimator angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°) and six different VMAT techniques (1 and 2 full coplanar arcs with collimator angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°) were planned for each patient. The dosimetric results of various treatment techniques for target tissue (conformity index [CI] and homogeneity index [HI]) and organs at risk (OARs) sparing (parameters obtained from OARs dose-volume histograms [DVH]) as well as radiobiological findings were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The 7-fields IMRT technique demonstrated lower bladder doses (V40Gy, V45Gy), unaffected by collimator rotation. The 9-fields IMRT and 2-arcs VMAT (excluding the 90-degree collimator) had the lowest V35Gy and V45Gy. A 90-degree collimator rotation in 2-arcs VMAT significantly increased small bowel and bladder V45Gy, femoral head doses, and HI values. Radiobiologically, the 90-degree rotation had adverse effects on small bowel NTCP (normal tissue complication probability). No superiority was found for a 45-degree collimator rotation over 0 or 30 degrees in VMAT techniques. CONCLUSION: Collimator rotation had minimal impact on dosimetric parameters in IMRT planning but is significant in VMAT techniques. A 90-degree rotation in VMAT, particularly in a 2-full arc technique, adversely affects PTV homogeneity index, bladder dose, and small bowel NTCP. Other evaluated collimator angles did not significantly affect VMAT dosimetrical or radiobiological outcomes.

Setup errors analysis in iterative kV CBCT: A clinical study of cervical cancer treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze setup errors in pelvic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for patients with non-surgical primary cervical cancer, utilizing the onboard iterative kV cone beam CT (iCBCT) imaging system on the Varian Halcyon 2.0 ring gantry structure accelerator to enhance radiotherapy precision. METHOD: We selected 132 cervical cancer patients who underwent VMAT with daily iCBCT imaging guidance. Before each treatment session, a registration method based on the bony structure was employed to acquire iCBCT images with the corresponding planning CT images. Following verification and adjustment of image registration results along the three axes (but not rotational), setup errors in the lateral (X-axis), longitudinal (Y-axis), and vertical (Z-axis) directions were recorded for each patient. Subsequently, we analyzed 3642 iCBCT image setup errors. RESULTS: The mean setup errors for the X, Y, and Z axes were 4.50 ± 3.79 mm, 6.08 ± 6.30 mm, and 1.48 ± 2.23 mm, respectively. Before correction with iCBCT, setup margins based on the Van Herk formula for the X, Y, and Z axes were 6.28, 12.52, and 3.26 mm, respectively. In individuals aged 60 years and older, setup errors in the X and Y axes were significantly larger than those in the younger group (p < 0.05). Additionally, there is no significant linear correlation between setup errors and treatment fraction numbers. CONCLUSION: Data analysis underscores the importance of precise Y-axis setup for cervical cancer patients undergoing VMAT. Radiotherapy centers without daily iCBCT should appropriately extend the planning target volume (PTV) along the Y-axis for cervical cancer patients receiving pelvic VMAT. Elderly patients exhibit significantly larger setup errors compared to younger counterparts. In conclusion, iCBCT-guided radiotherapy is recommended for cervical cancer patients undergoing VMAT to improve setup precision.

Sparing the Hippocampus in Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Using Three Different Linear Accelerators: A Comparative Study.

Hippocampus protection, as an organ at risk in brain radiotherapy, might protect patients' quality of life. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been used traditionally in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients as it increases survival. This study aimed to discover the contributing parameters for a successful PCI with simultaneous protection of the hippocampus by using three different treatment machines. For this purpose, treatment plans were generated for 45 SCLC patients using three half-arcs in three linear accelerators (LINACs; Elekta Infinity, Synergy, and Axesse; Elekta Ltd, Stockholm, Sweden) with different radiation field sizes and multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf thickness characteristics. The prescribed dose was 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Thresholds for the hippocampus were calculated based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0933 dose constraints. The planning and treatment system templates were common to all three LINACs. Plan evaluation was based on the dosimetric target coverage by the 95% isodose, the maximum dose of the plan, the conformity index (CI), the degree of plan modulation (MOD), and the patient-specific quality assurance (QA) pass rate. The mean target coverage was highest for Infinity (97.3%), followed by Axesse (96.6%) and Synergy (95.5%). The mean maximum dose was higher for Synergy (27.5 Gy), followed by Infinity (27.0 Gy) and Axesse (26.9 Gy). Axesse plans had the highest CI (0.93), followed by Infinity (0.91) and Synergy (0.88). Plan MOD was lower for Synergy (2.88) compared with Infinity (3.07) and Axesse (3.69). Finally, patient-specific QA was successful in all Infinity plans, in all but one Synergy plan, and in 17/45 Axesse plans, as was expected from the field size in that treatment unit. Based on overall performance, the most favorable combination of target coverage, hippocampus sparing, and plan deliverability was obtained with the LINAC, which has the largest field opening and thinnest MLC leaves.

Proton therapy reduces the effective dose to immune cells in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The effective dose to circulating immune cells (EDIC) is associated with survival in lung and esophageal cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for EDIC reduction as compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (BC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten BC patients treated with locoregional VMAT after breast-conserving surgery were included. Mean dose to the heart (MHD), lungs (MLD), and liver (MlD), as well as the integral dose to the body (ITD), were retrieved, and we calculated EDIC as 0.12â€¯× MLD + 0.08â€¯× MHD + 0.15â€¯× 0.85â€¯× âˆš(n/45)â€¯× MlD + (0.45 + 0.35â€¯× 0.85â€¯× âˆš(n/45))â€¯× ITD/(62â€¯× 103), where n is the number of fractions. EDIC was compared between VMAT and IMPT plans. RESULTS: Median EDIC was reduced from 3.37 Gy (range: 2.53-5.99) with VMAT to 2.13 Gy (1.31-3.77) with IMPT (p < 0.01). For left-sided BC patients, EDIC was reduced from 3.15 Gy (2.53-3.78) with VMAT to 1.65 Gy (1.31-3.77) with IMPT (p < 0.01). For right-sided BC patients, EDIC was reduced from 5.60 Gy (5.06-5.99) with VMAT to 3.38 Gy (3.10-3.77) with IMPT (p < 0.01). Right-sided BC patients had a higher EDIC irrespective of the technique. Integral dose reduction was the main driver of EDIC reduction with IMPT and was associated with lung sparing for left-sided BC patients or liver sparing for right-sided BC patients. CONCLUSION: IMPT significantly reduced EDIC in BC patients undergoing locoregional adjuvant radiotherapy. Integral total dose reduction, associated with improved lung sparing in left-sided BC patients or liver sparing in right-sided BC patients, mainly drove EDIC reduction with IMPT. The emergence of dynamic models taking into account the circulatory kinetics of immune cells may improve the accuracy of the estimate of the dose received by the immune system compared to calculation of the EDIC, which is based solely on static dosimetric data.

Dose to organs at risk for total body irradiation: Single-institution data using the modulated arc total body irradiation technique.

BACKGROUND: Organs at risk (OAR) dose reporting for total body irradiation (TBI) patients is limited, and standardly reported only as mean doses to the lungs and kidneys. Consequently, dose received and effects on other OAR remain unexplored. To remedy this gap, this study reports dose data on an extensive list of OAR for patients treated at a single institution using the modulated arc total body irradiation (MATBI) technique. METHOD: An audit was undertaken of all patients treated with MATBI between January 2015 and March 2021 who had completed their course of treatment. OAR were contoured on MATBI patient treatment plans, with 12 Gy in six fraction prescription. OAR dose statistics and dose volume histogram data are reported for the whole body, lungs, kidneys, bones, brain, lens, heart, liver and bowel bag. RESULTS: The OAR dose data for 29 patients are reported. Mean dose results are body 11.77 Gy, lungs 9.86 Gy, kidneys 11.84 Gy, bones 12.03 Gy, brain 12.12 Gy, right lens 12.31 Gy, left lens 12.64 Gy, heart 11.07 Gy, liver 11.81 Gy and bowel bag 12.06 Gy. Dose statistics at 1-Gy intervals of V6-V13 for lungs and V10-V13 for kidneys are also included. CONCLUSION: This is the first time an extensive list of OAR data has been reported for any TBI technique. Due to the paucity of reporting, this information could be used by centres implementing the MATBI technique, in addition to aiding comparison between TBI techniques, with the potential for greater understanding of the relationship between dose volume data and toxicity.

Robust optimization and assessment of dynamic trajectory and mixed-beam arc radiotherapy: a preliminary study.

Objective.Dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) and dynamic mixed-beam arc therapy (DYMBARC) exploit non-coplanarity and, for DYMBARC, simultaneously optimized photon and electron beams. Margin concepts to account for set-up uncertainties during delivery are ill-defined for electron fields. We develop robust optimization for DTRT&DYMBARC and compare dosimetric plan quality and robustness for both techniques and both optimization strategies for four cases.Approach.Cases for different treatment sites and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins,m, were investigated. Dynamic gantry-table-collimator photon paths were optimized to minimize PTV/organ-at-risk (OAR) overlap in beam's-eye-view and minimize potential photon multileaf collimator (MLC) travel. For DYMBARC plans, non-isocentric partial electron arcs or static fields with shortened source-to-surface distance (80 cm) were added. Direct aperture optimization (DAO) was used to simultaneously optimize MLC-based intensity modulation for both photon and electron beams yielding deliverable PTV-based DTRT&DYMBARC plans. Robust-optimized plans used the same paths/arcs/fields. DAO with stochastic programming was used for set-up uncertainties with equal weights in all translational directions and magnitudeδsuch thatm= 0.7δ. Robust analysis considered random errors in all directions with or without an additional systematic error in the worst 3D direction for the adjacent OARs.Main results.Electron contribution was 7%-41% of target dose depending on the case and optimization strategy for DYMBARC. All techniques achieved similar CTV coverage in the nominal (no error) scenario. OAR sparing was overall better in the DYMBARC plans than in the DTRT plans and DYMBARC plans were generally more robust to the considered uncertainties. OAR sparing was better in the PTV-based than in robust-optimized plans for OARs abutting or overlapping with the target volume, but more affected by uncertainties.Significance.Better plan robustness can be achieved with robust optimization than with margins. Combining electron arcs/fields with non-coplanar photon trajectories further improves robustness and OAR sparing.

Appropriateness of Dose Attenuation Margin Outside the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) in Volumetric-Modulated Arc-Based Radiosurgery for Brain Metastasis With the Steepest Dose Gradient Outside the GTV and Biologically Effective Dose 80 Gy to GTV Boundary.

Introduction In stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastasis (BM), volumetric-modulated arcs (VMA) can provide a suitable dose distribution and efficient delivery, even with a widely available 5-mm leaf-width multileaf collimator (MLC). The planning optimization with affirmatively accepting internal high doses of a gross tumor volume (GTV) enhances the steepness of the dose gradient outside the GTV. However, an excessively steep dose falloff outside a GTV is susceptible to insufficient coverage of inherent irradiation uncertainties with the dose attenuation margin. This study was conducted to examine the appropriateness of dose attenuation margin outside a GTV in 5-mm MLC VMA-based SRS with a steep dose gradient and dose prescription with a biologically effective dose (BED) 80 Gy in various fractions to the GTV margin. Materials and methods This was a planning study for the clinical scenario of a single BM and targeted 28 GTVs, including nine sphere-shaped models with diameters of 5-45 mm and 19 clinical BMs (GTV 0.08-44.33 cc). SRS plans were generated for each GTV using 5-mm MLC VMA with an optimization that prioritized the steepness of dose falloff outside the GTV boundary without any internal dose constraints. A prescribed dose with the BED 80 Gy in 1-10 fraction(s) was assigned to the GTV D V-0.01 cc, a minimum dose of GTV minus 0.01 cc (D >95% for GTV >0.20 cc, D 95% for GTV ≤0.20 cc). The BED was based on the linear-quadratic formula with an alpha/beta ratio of 10 (BED10). Two planning systems were compared for the GTV + 2 mm structures that were generated by adding an isotropic 2-mm margin to the GTV. Results The GTV + 2 mm volumes differed significantly between the systems and further varied on the dose-volume histograms. The D V-0.05 cc, D 98%, and D 95% of the GTV + 2 mm were associated with substantial over- or under-coverages of the GTV + 2 mm, although the irradiated isodose volumes (IIVs) of the D 98% were closest to the GTV + 2 mm in general. The coverage values of the GTV + 2 mm with the minimum dose of the IIV equivalent to the GTV + 2 mm, D eIIV, were 93.3%-98.7% (≥95% in 26 cases). The GTV + 2 mm D eIIV relative to the GTV D V-0.01 cc was ≥81.9% (BED10 ≥60 Gy in ≤5 fractions) in 13 cases, while those were <69.8% (BED10 <48 Gy in ≤5 fractions) in four cases with the GTV of 0.33-1.77 cc. Conclusions A dose attenuation margin outside a GTV can be excessively steep for some small GTVs in 5-mm MLC VMA-based SRS with a steepest dose gradient and a BED10 80 Gy in ≤5 fractions to the GTV D V-0.01 cc, for which an adjustment of the too precipitous dose gradient is preferred to sufficiently cover relevant uncertainties. A GTV + 2 mm D eIIV with ≥95% coverage is more suitable for evaluating the appropriateness of dose attenuation outside the GTV than other common metrics with a fixed % coverage or D V-≤0.05 cc. Given the substantial variability in margin addition functions among planning systems, dose prescription to a margin-added GTV is unsuitable for ensuring uniform dose prescription.

Assessment of different head tilt angles in volumetric modulated arc therapy for hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy.

Purpose: In the field of radiation therapy for brain metastases, whole-brain hippocampus-avoidance treatment is commonly employed. this study aims to examine the impact of different head tilt angles on the dose distribution in the whole-brain target area and organs at risk. It also aims to determine the head tilt angle to achieve optimal radiation therapy outcomes. Methods: CT images were collected from 8 brain metastases patients at 5 different groups of head tilt angle. The treatment plans were designed using the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. The 5 groups of tilt angle were as follows: [0°,10°), [10°,20°), [20°,30°), [30°,40°), and [40°,45°]. The analysis involved assessing parameters such as the uniformity index, conformity index, average dose delivered to the target, dose coverage of the target, hot spots within the target area, maximum dose, and average dose received by organs at risk. Additionally, the study evaluated the correlation between hippocampal dose and other factors, and established linear regression models. Results: Significant differences in dosimetric results were observed between the [40°,45°] and [0°,10°) head tilt angles. The [40°,45°] angle showed significant differences compared to the [0°,10°) angle in the average dose in the target area (31.49 ± 0.29 Gy vs. 31.99 ± 0.29 Gy, p=0.016), dose uniformity (1.20 ± 0.03 vs. 1.24 ± 0.03, p=0.016), hotspots in the target area (33.64 ± 0.35 Gy vs. 34.42 ± 0.49 Gy, p=0.016), maximum hippocampal dose (10.73 ± 0.36 Gy vs. 11.66 ± 0.59 Gy, p=0.008), maximum dose in the lens (2.82 ± 1.10 Gy vs. 4.99 ± 0.16 Gy, p=0.016), and average dose in the lens (1.93 ± 0.29 Gy vs. 4.22 ± 0.26 Gy, p=0.008). There is a moderate correlation between the maximum dose in the hippocampi and the PTV length (r=0.49, p=0.001). Likewise, the mean dose in the hippocampi is significantly correlated with the hippocampi length (r=0.34, p=0.04). Conclusion: The VMAT plan with a head tilt angle of [40°,45°] met all dose constraints and demonstrated improved uniformity of the target area while reducing the dose to organs at risk. Furthermore, the linear regression models suggest that increasing the head tilt angle within the current range of [0°,45°] is likely to lead to a decrease in the average hippocampal dose.

Development and validation of an automated Tomotherapy planning method for cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop an automated Tomotherapy (TOMO) planning method for cervical cancer treatment, and to validate its feasibility and effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study enrolled 30 cervical cancer patients treated with TOMO at our center. Utilizing scripting and Python environment within the RayStation (RaySearch Labs, Sweden) treatment planning system (TPS), we developed automated planning methods for TOMO and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques. The clinical manual TOMO (M-TOMO) plans for the 30 patients were re-optimized using automated planning scripts for both TOMO and VMAT, creating automated TOMO (A-TOMO) and automated VMAT (A-VMAT) plans. We compared A-TOMO with M-TOMO and A-VMAT plans. The primary evaluated relevant dosimetric parameters and treatment plan efficiency were assessed using the two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test for statistical analysis, with a P-value < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. RESULTS: A-TOMO plans maintained similar target dose uniformity compared to M-TOMO plans, with improvements in target conformity and faster dose drop-off outside the target, and demonstrated significant statistical differences (P+ < 0.01). A-TOMO plans also significantly outperformed M-TOMO plans in reducing V50Gy, V40Gy and Dmean for the bladder and rectum, as well as Dmean for the bowel bag, femoral heads, and kidneys (all P+ < 0.05). Additionally, A-TOMO plans demonstrated better consistency in plan quality. Furthermore, the quality of A-TOMO plans was comparable to or superior than A-VMAT plans. In terms of efficiency, A-TOMO significantly reduced the time required for treatment planning to approximately 20 min. CONCLUSION: We have successfully developed an A-TOMO planning method for cervical cancer. Compared to M-TOMO plans, A-TOMO plans improved target conformity and reduced radiation dose to OARs. Additionally, the quality of A-TOMO plans was on par with or surpasses that of A-VMAT plans. The A-TOMO planning method significantly improved the efficiency of treatment planning.

Dosimetric comparison of IMPT vs VMAT for multiple lung lesions: an NTCP model-based decision-making strategy.

To compare the dosimetric differences in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of multiple lung lesions and determine a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model-based decision strategy that determines which treatment modality the patient will use. A total of 41 patients were retrospectively selected for this study. The number of patients with 1-6 lesions was 5, 16, 7, 6, 3, and 4, respectively. A prescription dose of 70 GyRBE in 10 fractions was given to each lesion. SBRT plans were generated using VMAT and IMPT. All the IMPT plans used robustness optimization with ± 3.5% range uncertainties and 5 mm setup uncertainties. Dosimetric metrics and the predicted NTCP value of radiation pneumonitis (RP), esophagitis, and pericarditis were analyzed to evaluate the potential clinical benefits between different planning groups. In addition, a threshold for the ratio of PTV to lungs (%) to determine whether a patient would benefit highly from IMPT was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. All plans reached target coverage (V70GyRBE ≥ 95%). Compared with VMAT, IMPT resulted in a significantly lower dose of most thoracic normal tissues. For the 1-2, 3-4 and 5-6 lesion groups, the lung V5 was 29.90 ± 9.44%, 58.33 ± 13.35%, and 81.02 ± 5.91% for VMAT and 11.34 ± 3.11% (p < 0.001), 21.45 ± 3.80% (p < 0.001), and 32.48 ± 4.90% (p < 0.001) for IMPT, respectively. The lung V20 was 12.07 ± 4.94%, 25.57 ± 6.54%, and 43.99 ± 11.83% for VMAT and 6.76 ± 1.80% (p < 0.001), 13.14 ± 2.27% (p < 0.01), and 19.62 ± 3.48% (p < 0.01) for IMPT. The Dmean of the total lung was 7.65 ± 2.47 GyRBE, 14.78 ± 2.75 GyRBE, and 21.64 ± 4.07 GyRBE for VMAT and 3.69 ± 1.04 GyRBE (p < 0.001), 7.13 ± 1.41 GyRBE (p < 0.001), and 10.69 ± 1.81 GyRBE (p < 0.001) for IMPT. Additionally, in the VMAT group, the maximum NTCP value of radiation pneumonitis was 73.91%, whereas it was significantly lower in the IMPT group at 10.73%. The accuracy of our NTCP model-based decision model, which combines the number of lesions and PTV/Lungs (%), was 97.6%. The study demonstrated that the IMPT SBRT for multiple lung lesions had satisfactory dosimetry results, even when the number of lesions reached 6. The NTCP model-based decision strategy presented in our study could serve as an effective tool in clinical practice, aiding in the selection of the optimal treatment modality between VMAT and IMPT.