ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose: to assess the impact of electroacoustic verification on the satisfaction level and speech recognition in quiet and noise of hearing aid users. Methods: 24 individuals who had been using the device for at least 1 year and had not previously performed electroacoustic verification were assessed. In the first session, participants responded to the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids validation questionnaire and indicated their satisfaction level on a visual analog scale. They were, then, subjected to speech perception tests in quiet and noise and electroacoustic verification, returning after 3 months and repeating the first stage assessments. The Wilcoxon test and paired t-test were used for data analysis, with significance set at p-value ≤ 0.05. Results: the visual analog scale assessment, the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids score, the speech perception threshold in quiet and noise, and the signal/noise ratio improved after 3 months. Conclusion: individuals who had been using the device for at least 1 year had a substantial improvement in their satisfaction level and speech perception in quiet and noise after the electroacoustic verification.
RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar o impacto da verificação eletroacústica no grau de satisfação e no reconhecimento de fala no silêncio e no ruído em usuários de aparelho de amplificação sonora individual. Métodos: foram avaliados 24 usuários que utilizavam o dispositivo há pelo menos um ano e sem realização anterior de verificação eletroacústica. Em um primeiro encontro, os participantes responderam ao questionário de validação International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids e atribuíram uma nota de satisfação por meio da escala visual analógica. Em seguida, foram submetidos a testes de percepção de fala no silêncio e no ruído, finalizando com a realização da verificação eletroacústica. Retornaram após três meses e repetiram as avaliações da primeira etapa. Para a análise dos dados, foram utilizados os testes de Wilcoxon e Teste t pareado, valor de p ≤ 0,05. Resultados: observou-se melhora na avaliação da escala visual analógica, na pontuação do International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids, no limiar de percepção de fala no silêncio e ruído e na relação sinal/ruído no seguimento de três meses. Conclusão: após a verificação eletroacústica, os usuários que utilizavam o dispositivo há pelo menos um ano apresentaram melhora substancial no grau de satisfação e na percepção de fala no silêncio e no ruído.
ABSTRACT
Introducción. Las pruebas de función pulmonar permiten objetivar el grado de obstrucción bronquial en sujetos colaboradores. La medición de las resistencias pulmonares por métodos pasivos es muy útil en sujetos no colaboradores. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la aplicabilidad de la medición de resistencias por interrupción (Rint) en la edad pediátrica, valorando su reproducibilidad, fabilidad y exactitud en relación con otras técnicas de medición de resistencias. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal en niños de entre 2 y 18 años, sanos y con patología obstructiva. Se midió la Rint con un aparato portátil y se comparó con las resistencias medidas por oscilometría y pletismografía. Se valoró la reproducibilidad de las mediciones y la infuencia de diferentes variables (uso de mascarilla o boquilla, sujeción de mejillas o uso de pinza nasal). Resultados. De 460 niños (47,6% menores de 7 años) se obtuvieron medidas válidas en el 82,6%. La reproducibilidad fue muy buena (CCI= 0,9412; p < 0,00001), sin encontrar diferencias entre las medidas obtenidas separadas en el tiempo (0,75 ± 0,3 contra 0,74 ± 0,28; p= 0,435). Ninguno de los factores antes mencionados afectó la reproducibilidad de las medidas. Los valores de resistencia obtenidos por pletismografía y oscilometría fueron superiores a los obtenidos por Rint, con una correlación positiva entre ambos. La correlación con la pletismografía disminuía cuanto mayor era el grado de obstrucción. Conclusiones. La medición de Rint es factible y reproducible, y se correlaciona bien con las resistencias medidas por oscilometría o pletismografía, por lo que sería de utilidad en los pacientes poco colaboradores. En los pacientes obstruidos, podría infraestimar la resistencia, difcultando su uso para el seguimiento de una patología obstructiva moderada-grave o en las pruebas de provocación bronquial.
Introduction. Pulmonary function tests allow an objective assessment of the degree of bronchial obstruction in collaborative subjects. The measurement of airway resistance using passive methods is very helpful in non-collaborative subjects. The objective of this study was to assess the applicability of measuring airway resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) in pediatric subjects, determining its reproducibility, reliability and accuracy versus other techniques to measure airway resistance. Material and Methods. Cross-sectional study in healthy children and in children with an obstructive airway disease, all aged 2-18 years old. The Rint was measured using a portable device and results were compared to airway resistance measured by oscillometry and plethysmography. The reproducibility of measurements and the infuence of the different outcome measures (use of mask or mouthpiece, cheek support, or nose clip) were assessed. Results. Valid measurements were obtained in 82.6% of 460 children (47.6% younger than 7 years old). Reproducibility was very good (ICC= 0.9412; p <0.00001), and no differences were found among the measurements obtained at separate time intervals (0.75 ± 0.3 versus 0.74 ± 0.28; p= 0.435). None of the factors indicated before had an effect on the reproducibility of measurements. Resistance values obtained by plethysmography and oscillometry were higher than those obtained using the Rint, with a positive correlation between them. The higher the degree of airway obstruction, the worse the correlation with plethysmography. Conclusions. The Rint measurement is a plausible and reproducible technique, and has an adequate correlation with the resistance measurements obtained using oscillometry or plethysmography, thus making it useful for non-collaborative patients. In patients with airway obstruction, this technique could underestimate resistance, so it would be a hurdle to use it to follow-up subjects with a moderate to severe obstructive disease or in bronchial challenge tests.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Airway Resistance/physiology , Asthma/physiopathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Respiratory Function Tests/methodsABSTRACT
Introducción. Las pruebas de función pulmonar permiten objetivar el grado de obstrucción bronquial en sujetos colaboradores. La medición de las resistencias pulmonares por métodos pasivos es muy útil en sujetos no colaboradores. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la aplicabilidad de la medición de resistencias por interrupción (Rint) en la edad pediátrica, valorando su reproducibilidad, fabilidad y exactitud en relación con otras técnicas de medición de resistencias. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal en niños de entre 2 y 18 años, sanos y con patología obstructiva. Se midió la Rint con un aparato portátil y se comparó con las resistencias medidas por oscilometría y pletismografía. Se valoró la reproducibilidad de las mediciones y la infuencia de diferentes variables (uso de mascarilla o boquilla, sujeción de mejillas o uso de pinza nasal). Resultados. De 460 niños (47,6% menores de 7 años) se obtuvieron medidas válidas en el 82,6%. La reproducibilidad fue muy buena (CCI= 0,9412; p < 0,00001), sin encontrar diferencias entre las medidas obtenidas separadas en el tiempo (0,75 ± 0,3 contra 0,74 ± 0,28; p= 0,435). Ninguno de los factores antes mencionados afectó la reproducibilidad de las medidas. Los valores de resistencia obtenidos por pletismografía y oscilometría fueron superiores a los obtenidos por Rint, con una correlación positiva entre ambos. La correlación con la pletismografía disminuía cuanto mayor era el grado de obstrucción. Conclusiones. La medición de Rint es factible y reproducible, y se correlaciona bien con las resistencias medidas por oscilometría o pletismografía, por lo que sería de utilidad en los pacientes poco colaboradores. En los pacientes obstruidos, podría infraestimar la resistencia, difcultando su uso para el seguimiento de una patología obstructiva moderada-grave o en las pruebas de provocación bronquial.(AU)
Introduction. Pulmonary function tests allow an objective assessment of the degree of bronchial obstruction in collaborative subjects. The measurement of airway resistance using passive methods is very helpful in non-collaborative subjects. The objective of this study was to assess the applicability of measuring airway resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) in pediatric subjects, determining its reproducibility, reliability and accuracy versus other techniques to measure airway resistance. Material and Methods. Cross-sectional study in healthy children and in children with an obstructive airway disease, all aged 2-18 years old. The Rint was measured using a portable device and results were compared to airway resistance measured by oscillometry and plethysmography. The reproducibility of measurements and the infuence of the different outcome measures (use of mask or mouthpiece, cheek support, or nose clip) were assessed. Results. Valid measurements were obtained in 82.6% of 460 children (47.6% younger than 7 years old). Reproducibility was very good (ICC= 0.9412; p <0.00001), and no differences were found among the measurements obtained at separate time intervals (0.75 ± 0.3 versus 0.74 ± 0.28; p= 0.435). None of the factors indicated before had an effect on the reproducibility of measurements. Resistance values obtained by plethysmography and oscillometry were higher than those obtained using the Rint, with a positive correlation between them. The higher the degree of airway obstruction, the worse the correlation with plethysmography. Conclusions. The Rint measurement is a plausible and reproducible technique, and has an adequate correlation with the resistance measurements obtained using oscillometry or plethysmography, thus making it useful for non-collaborative patients. In patients with airway obstruction, this technique could underestimate resistance, so it would be a hurdle to use it to follow-up subjects with a moderate to severe obstructive disease or in bronchial challenge tests.(AU)