Exploring the benefit of different methods to perform assisted hatching in the ART laboratory: A narrative review.

In the last decades, to enhance success rates in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles, scientists have continually tried to optimize embryo culture and selection to increase clinical outcomes. In this scenario, the application of laser technology has increased considerably worldwide and is currently applied across ART in several ways: for assisted hatching (AH) or thinning of the zona pellucida (ZP), embryo biopsy, to immobilize and select the sperm during intracytoplasmic sperm injection, as well as to induce artificial blastocyst shrinkage before cryopreservation. Laser-AH has been suggested as a procedure to improve embryo implantation: the concept is that drilling holes through or thinning of the ZP could improve the hatching process and implantation. The artificial disruption of the ZP can be performed by different approaches: mechanically, chemically and with the laser, which is one of the most favourable and easy methods to remove part of the ZP and to augment the possibilities of implantation in patients defined as having a poor prognosis of success, or when the ZP is too thick. However, in the current literature, there is not sufficient evidence about the potential risk or impairment that laser utilization might induce on embryo development; therefore, the main aim of the current review is to provide an overview of the existing knowledge on the ZP and the mechanisms of manipulating it to improve the effectiveness of ART. Also, it emphasizes the positive aspect of laser application as a powerful tool that might increase the chance of pregnancy for infertile couples undergoing ART cycles.

Cellular mechanisms of monozygotic twinning: clues from assisted reproduction.

BACKGROUND: Monozygotic (MZ) twins are believed to arise from the fission of a single fertilized embryo at different stages. Monochorionic MZ twins, who share one chorion, originate from the splitting of the inner cell mass (ICM) within a single blastocyst. In the classic model for dichorionic MZ twins, the embryo splits before compaction, developing into two blastocysts. However, there are a growing number of ART cases where a single blastocyst transfer results in dichorionic MZ twins, indicating that embryo splitting may occur even after blastocyst formation. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: For monochorionic MZ twins, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the cellular mechanisms involved in ICM splitting, drawing from both ART cases and animal experiments. In addition, we critically re-examine the classic early splitting model for dichorionic MZ twins. We explore cellular mechanisms leading to two separated blastocysts in ART, potentially causing dichorionic MZ twins. SEARCH METHODS: Relevant studies including research articles, reviews, and conference papers were searched in the PubMed database. Cases of MZ twins from IVF clinics were found by using combinations of terms including 'monozygotic twins' with 'IVF case report', 'ART', 'single embryo transfer', or 'dichorionic'. The papers retrieved were categorized based on the implicated mechanisms or as those with unexplained mechanisms. Animal experiments relating to MZ twins were found using 'mouse embryo monozygotic twins', 'mouse 8-shaped hatching', 'zebrafish janus mutant', and 'nine-banded armadillo embryo', along with literature collected through day-to-day reading. The search was limited to articles in English, with no restrictions on publication date or species. OUTCOMES: For monochorionic MZ twins, ART cases and mouse experiments demonstrate evidence that a looser ICM in blastocysts has an increased chance of ICM separation. Physical forces facilitated by blastocoel formation or 8-shaped hatching are exerted on the ICM, resulting in monochorionic MZ twins. For dichorionic MZ twins, the classic model resembles artificial cloning of mouse embryos in vitro, requiring strictly controlled splitting forces, re-joining prevention, and proper aggregation, which allows the formation of two separate human blastocysts under physiological circumstances. In contrast, ART procedures involving the transfer of a single blastocysts after atypical hatching or vitrified-warmed cycles might lead to blastocyst separation. Differences in morphology, molecular mechanisms, and timing across various animal model systems for MZ twinning can impede this research field. As discussed in future directions, recent developments of innovative in vitro models of human embryos may offer promising avenues for providing fundamental novel insights into the cellular mechanisms of MZ twinning during human embryogenesis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Twin pregnancies pose high risks to both the fetuses and the mother. While single embryo transfer is commonly employed to prevent dizygotic twin pregnancies in ART, it cannot prevent the occurrence of MZ twins. Drawing from our understanding of the cellular mechanisms underlying monochorionic and dichorionic MZ twinning, along with insights into the genetic mechanisms, could enable improved prediction, prevention, and even intervention strategies during ART procedures. REGISTRAITON NUMBER: N/A.

Two laser-assisted hatching methods of embryos in ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laser-assisted hatching (LAH) stands as the predominant technique for removing the zona pellucida (ZP) in embryos, primarily consisting of two methods: drilling laser-assisted hatching (D-LAH) and thinning laser-assisted hatching (T-LAH). Presently, both methods have limitations, and their comparative efficacy for embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy remains uncertain. AIM: Evaluate the impact of D-LAH and T-LAH on clinical pregnancy rates within assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library until July 20, 2022. This study encompassed observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A 95% confidence interval (CI) was utilized for assessing the risk ratio (RR) of pregnancy outcomes. The level of heterogeneity was measured using I2 statistics, considering a value exceeding 50% as indicative of substantial heterogeneity. RESULTS: The meta-analysis scrutinized 9 studies involving 2405 clinical pregnancies from D-LAH and 2239 from T-LAH. Findings suggested no considerable variation in the clinical pregnancy rates between the two techniques (RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.79-1.10, I2 = 71%, P = 0.41). Subgroup analyses also revealed no substantial differences. However, D-LAH exhibited a notably higher occurrence of singleton pregnancies compared to T-LAH (RR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.08-4.82, I2 = 89%, P = 0.03). There were no noteworthy distinctions observed in other secondary outcomes encompassing implantation rate, multiple pregnancies, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, premature birth, and live birth. CONCLUSION: Both the primary findings and subgroup analyses showed no marked variance in clinical pregnancy rates between D-LAH and T-LAH. Therefore, patients with varying conditions should select their preferred LAH technique after assessing their individual situation. However, due to the restricted number of studies involved, accurately gauging the influence of these laser techniques on clinical outcomes is challenging, necessitating further RCTs and high-quality studies to enhance the success rate of ART. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42022347066.

A Case Study on the Efficacy of Hypo-Osmotic Swelling Test and Assisted Hatching in Overcoming Necrozoospermia Challenges.

This case report examines the difficulties faced by a couple with 11 years of primary infertility. Based on the diagnostic evaluation, it was determined that the male was a necrozoospermia patient, while the female had unilateral cornual blockage and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) with diabetes mellitus (DM) symptoms identified. A comprehensive approach was used in the treatment for the female patient, which included a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) short antagonist protocol, a GnRH agonist (GnRHa) trigger, assisted hatching (AH), and the use of the hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST) to gauge the viability of the sperm. The successful outcome, as evidenced by the increasing levels of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) and a successful embryo transfer, highlights the effectiveness of a customized and multifaceted approach in managing intricate infertility problems. This instance offers insightful information about the way modern reproductive technologies can be successfully integrated with specialized treatment plans to achieve successful outcomes in difficult cases of infertility.

The effect of laser-assisted hatching on vitrified/warmed blastocysts: the ALADDIN randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether laser-mediated assisted hatching (AH) performed on vitrified/warmed blastocysts before embryo transfer can improve live birth rate. DESIGN: The "pArtiaL zonA pelluciDa removal by assisteD hatchINg of blastocysts (ALADDIN)" is a 2-center comparative study with a parallel randomized controlled design. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Participants were recruited between September 2018 and November 2021. They were aged 18-39 years, underwent nondonor in vitro fertilization cycles, and were scheduled for elective single embryo transfer with vitrified/warmed blastocysts. Those with uterine abnormalities, body mass index of >35 kg/m2, severe male factor infertility, or performing preimplantation genetic testing were excluded. INTERVENTION: Assisted hatching was performed using a 1,480 nm diode laser, removing approximately one-third of the zona pellucida with continuous 0.2 ms pulses applied from the 1-5 o'clock positions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the live birth rate. Secondary end points included clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancies, preterm births, obstetric and neonatal complications, and congenital anomalies. RESULTS: Overall, 698 participants met the inclusion criteria and were randomized: 352 patients were assigned to the AH arm and 346 to the control arm. Of the participants, 105 (29.8%) and 101 (29.2%), respectively, achieved a live birth after treatment. The relative risk of live birth in patients with vitrified/warmed blastocysts treated with AH was 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.19). Exploratory subgroup analyses for women's age, recruiting centers, indications for in vitro fertilization, method of insemination, blastocyst quality, and days of blastocyst development failed to highlight any clinical situation that could benefit from AH in thawed blastocysts. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer with vitrified/warmed blastocysts, laser AH does not improve the live birth rate. Further studies are required to rule out milder but potentially interesting benefits in specific subgroups of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03623659.

Clinical and neonatal outcomes of complete zona pellucida removal by laser-assisted hatching after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.

Laser-assisted hatching (LAH) is a widely used and unavoidable technique in assisted reproductive technology after frozen embryo transfer (FET). We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of completely ZP (zona pellucida) removed by an assisted laser group compared to an intact group after FET. This retrospective study involved 320 SVBT  single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers of 213 patients who underwent clomiphene citrate (CC) based minimal stimulation protocol. This study compared 160 SVBT with ZP that were completely removed using laser-assisted (laser beams of 10-15, a wavelength of 1.48 µm, and duration of 1.8-2.2 ms) to 160 cases of intact SVBT. Fisher's exact test, chi-squared test, and logistic regression are used for statistical analysis. The women's age, cause of infertility, BMI, transferred embryo day, insemination methods, and blastocyst grade were not significantly different between two groups. The implantation rate (66.2% vs. 51.2%, P < 0.01), the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR, 52.5% vs. 39.3%, P = 0.01), and the live birth rate (LBR, 43.7% vs. 29.3%, P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the completely ZP removed than the intact group. In logistic regression analysis, the laser-assisted hatching group showed about 2 times higher implantation rate and CPR and LBR than the control group. But miscarriage, gestational weeks, gender, birth weight, and twin births were insignificant between two groups. Our study suggests ZP free embryo transfer by assisted laser is more effective and safer than intact embryo transfer.

Dual laser-assisted hatching: an effective technique to salvage low-grade cleavage-stage embryos and harvest day 7 blastocysts.

To investigate whether repeating laser-assisted hatching (LAH) procedure on day 6 low-grade cleavage-stage embryos (LGCEs) helps blastulation. A total of 579 cycles with LGCEs from 2019 to 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. In 323 cycles, single LAH producing small holes (10 µm) was performed on LGCEs on day 4 (D4-LAH). In 256 cycles with persistent LGCEs despite D4-LAH, a repeat LAH procedure was performed on day 6 (Dual-LAH) with a bigger hole (30 µm). We compared day 7 blastocyst formation rate, usable blastocyst rate, and good grade blastocyst rate from these day 6 LGCEs between the two groups. Compared to the D4-LAH group, the Dual-LAH group had both higher day 7 blastocyst formation rate (9.4% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.001) and higher day 7 usable blastocyst rates (7.4% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001). For persistent LGCEs despite single LAH, performing a repeat LAH on day 6 increased day 7 blastocyst formation rate.

A multicentre double-blinded randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of laser-assisted hatching in patients with repeated implantation failure undergoing IVF or ICSI.

STUDY QUESTION: Does assisted hatching increase the cumulative live birth rate in subfertile couples with repeated implantation failure? SUMMARY ANSWER: This study showed no evidence of effect for assisted hatching as an add-on in subfertile couples with repeated implantation failure. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The efficacy of assisted hatching, with regard to the live birth rate has not been convincingly demonstrated in randomized trials nor meta-analyses. It is suggested though that especially poor prognosis women, e.g. women with repeated implantation failure, might benefit most from assisted hatching. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study was designed as a double-blinded, multicentre randomized controlled superiority trial. In order to demonstrate a statistically significant absolute increase in live birth rate of 10% after assisted hatching, 294 participants needed to be included per treatment arm, being a total of 588 subfertile couples. Participants were included and randomized from November 2012 until November 2017, 297 were allocated to the assisted hatching arm of the study and 295 to the control arm. Block randomization in blocks of 20 participants was applied and randomization was concealed from participants, treating physicians, and laboratory staff involved in the embryo transfer procedure. Ovarian hyperstimulation, oocyte retrieval, laboratory procedures, embryo selection for transfer and cryopreservation, the transfer itself, and luteal support were performed according to local protocols and were identical in both the intervention and control arm of the study with the exception of the assisted hatching procedure which was only performed in the intervention group. The laboratory staff performing the assisted hatching procedure was not involved in the embryo transfer itself. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Participants were eligible for inclusion in the study after having had either at least two consecutive fresh IVF or ICSI embryo transfers, including the transfer of frozen and thawed embryos originating from those fresh cycles, and which did not result in a pregnancy or as having had at least one fresh IVF or ICSI transfer and at least two frozen embryo transfers with embryos originating from that fresh cycle which did not result in a pregnancy. The study was performed at the laboratory sites of three tertiary referral hospitals and two university medical centres in the Netherlands. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The cumulative live birth rate per started cycle, including the transfer of fresh and subsequent frozen/thawed embryos if applicable, resulted in 77 live births in the assisted hatching group (n = 297, 25.9%) and 68 live births in the control group (n = 295, 23.1%). This proved to be statistically not significantly different (relative risk: 1.125, 95% CI: 0.847 to 1.494, P = 0.416). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There was a small cohort of subfertile couples that after not achieving an ongoing pregnancy, still had cryopreserved embryos in storage at the endpoint of the trial, i.e. 1 year after the last randomization. It cannot be excluded that the future transfer of these frozen/thawed embryos increases the cumulative live birth rate in either or both study arms. Next, at the start of this study, there was no international consensus on the definition of repeated implantation failure. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that assisted hatching might be effective in higher order repeated implantation failures. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study demonstrated no evidence of a statistically significant effect for assisted hatching by increasing live birth rates in subfertile couples with repeated implantation failure, i.e. the couples which, based on meta-analyses, are suggested to benefit most from assisted hatching. It is therefore suggested that assisted hatching should only be offered if information on the absence of evidence of effect is provided, at no extra costs and preferably only in the setting of a clinical trial taking cost-effectiveness into account. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR 3387, NL 3235, https://www.clinicaltrialregister.nl/nl/trial/26138). TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 6 April 2012. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 28 November 2012.

Efficacy of Hyaluronan-Enriched Transfer Medium for Low-Grade Frozen Embryo Transfer.

RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of a hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium (HETM) for transfer failures and transfer of frozen embryos that have been graded as C at the time of transfer according to the Gardner classification of trophectoderm (TE). DESIGN: This study included 365 cycles of unsuccessful frozen-thawed embryo transfers in hormone replacement cycles graded C according to the Gardner classification of TE at the time of transfer. Clinical pregnancy rates were compared using the χ2 test, with the patients divided into two groups: one whose transfers did include HETM (HETM group) and one whose transfers did not include HETM (control group). As a subgroup analysis, patients with a TE grade of C at the time of transplantation were divided into two groups: those aged 39 years or younger and those aged 40 years or older at the time of transplantation. The clinical pregnancy rates of the groups with and without HETM were then compared. RESULTS: No difference in the clinical pregnancy rates between the HETM and control groups was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Hyaluronic acid is believed to favor implantation by promoting adhesion between the embryo and the endometrium, and there are reports of improved implantation and pregnancy rates as a result of HETM. However, the present results suggest limited effectiveness for HETM. Further case series should be conducted, and the suitability of its use as a treatment should be investigated.

Laser-assisted hatching improves pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles of cleavage-stage embryos: a large retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.

INTRODUCTION: Laser-assisted hatching (LAH) is a commonly used adjunct technique; however, its effectiveness has not been fully established. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effects of LAH on pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles of cleavage-stage embryos. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study involved 5779 FET cycles performed at the Reproductive and Genetic Center in the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2016 and December 2020. After propensity score matching, 3535 FET cycles were included, out of which 1238 were subjected to LAH while the remaining 2297 cycles were non-LAH (NLAH). The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) while secondary outcomes included implantation rate (IR), biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), ectopic pregnancy rate (EPR), pregnancy loss rate (PLR), multiple pregnancy rate (MPL), and monozygotic twinning rate (MTR). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to adjust for possible confounders. Subgroup analysis was also performed based on the endometrial preparation regimen. RESULTS: The LAH group exhibited a higher LBR, compared to the NLAH group (34.9% vs. 31.4%, OR = 1.185, 95% CI = 1.023, 1.374, P = 0.024). Additionally, the LAH group showed a decreasing trend in PLR and EPR; however, differences were insignificant (P = 0.078, P = 0.063 respectively). Differences in IR (24.6% vs. 24.3%), BPR (41.8% vs. 40.4%), CPR (40.7% vs. 38.3%), MPR (14.1% vs. 17.3%), and MTR (1.4% vs. 1.1%) were insignificant. Subgroup analysis revealed that LAH may be more conducive for pregnancy outcomes in hormone replacement cycles. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, LAH has an increased chance of achieving live births. However, further prospective studies should be performed to confirm our findings.

Advancements in the future of automating micromanipulation techniques in the IVF laboratory using deep convolutional neural networks.

PURPOSE: To determine if deep learning artificial intelligence algorithms can be used to accurately identify key morphologic landmarks on oocytes and cleavage stage embryo images for micromanipulation procedures such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) or assisted hatching (AH). METHODS: Two convolutional neural network (CNN) models were trained, validated, and tested over three replicates to identify key morphologic landmarks used to guide embryologists when performing micromanipulation procedures. The first model (CNN-ICSI) was trained (n = 13,992), validated (n = 1920), and tested (n = 3900) to identify the optimal location for ICSI through polar body identification. The second model (CNN-AH) was trained (n = 13,908), validated (n = 1908), and tested (n = 3888) to identify the optimal location for AH on the zona pellucida that maximizes distance from healthy blastomeres. RESULTS: The CNN-ICSI model accurately identified the polar body and corresponding optimal ICSI location with 98.9% accuracy (95% CI 98.5-99.2%) with a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) with micro and macro area under the curves (AUC) of 1. The CNN-AH model accurately identified the optimal AH location with 99.41% accuracy (95% CI 99.11-99.62%) with a ROC with micro and macro AUCs of 1. CONCLUSION: Deep CNN models demonstrate powerful potential in accurately identifying key landmarks on oocytes and cleavage stage embryos for micromanipulation. These findings are novel, essential stepping stones in the automation of micromanipulation procedures.

The Impact of Assisted Hatching on Monozygotic Twinning is Related to Female Age and Insemination Method: A New Perspective.

Whether assisted hatching (AH) is associated with a higher incidence of monozygotic twinning (MZT) in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology remains controversial; the aim of the study was to demonstrate the relationship between AH and MZT. A total of 8900 clinical pregnancies were selected among embryo transfer cycles from January 2011 to October 2019. Women receiving day (D) 3 embryos were divided into groups A-C: group A (n = 1651) and group B (n = 1045) included women aged ≤37 or ≥38 years, respectively, with zona pellucida (ZP) thinning; group C (n = 3865) included women aged ≤37 years without AH. Women aged ≤37 years who underwent blastocyst transfer and/or blastocyst ZP breaching were included in group D (n = 2339). The incidence of MZT was compared among groups A, B and C, and between groups C and D. The incidence of MZT in group B (2.2%) was significantly higher than in group A (1.0%), especially following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), while the incidence of MZT in group A (1.0%) was significantly lower than in group C (2.2%). The MZT rate with in vitro fertilization was higher in group D (2.8%) than in group C (2.2%), but the MZT rate following ICSI was not significantly different between the two groups. ZP thinning of D3 embryos may increase the risk of MZT in older women (≥38 years), but decrease it in younger women (≤37 years). ZP breaching may be useful to reduce the incidence of MZT in ICSI-generated blastocysts.

Thinning or Opening: A Randomized Sibling-Embryo Pilot Trial on the Efficacy of Two Laser-Assisted Hatching Modes During the Extended Culture of Highly Fragmented Cleavage Embryos.

A randomized sibling-embryo pilot trial investigated whether two ways of laser-assisted hatching result in different blastulation and clinical outcomes after extended in vitro culture process of highly fragmented day-3 cleavage embryos. From 92 couples, a total of 315 highly fragmented day-3 embryos (the fragmentation >25%) were recruited and randomized into laser-assisted zona thinning (LAT, n=157) and opening (LAO, n=158) groups, and then underwent a blastocyst culture in vitro. The main endpoint measurements including blastocyst formation and grading as well as the clinical pregnancy after blastocyst transfer were obtained during the treatment procedure of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, and then analyzed with generalized estimating equation (GEE) and/or time-to blastocyst analysis models. A total of 166 day-3 embryos developed into blastocyst stage (52.70%), of which 97 were viable blastocysts (30.79%), and 42 top-quality ones (13.33%). LAT did not have any inferior or superior to LAO in the endpoints of either total, viable, top-quality or hatched blastocyst formation, with the ORs (95%CI) from GEE model as 0.89 (0.55-1.45), 0.71 (0.42-1.21), 1.12 (0.56-2.25) and 0.68 (0.42-1.12) respectively for LAT treatment. And the time-to-blastocyst analysis showed a similar result. Additionally, no difference in clinical outcomes after blastocyst transfer was found between the two groups. The author concluded that when applying the LAHs during the extended culture of highly fragmented embryos, both LAT and LAO can generate a promising clinical outcome, and the LAT operation be equivalent to the LAO. Future well-designed, multiple-center, larger-sample investigations are required to ascertain above conclusion.

Placental histology following assisted hatching in fresh transfer cycles.

PURPOSE: To assess placental histological findings following assisted hatching in fresh transfer in vitro fertilization cycles. METHODS: Evaluation of a historic cohort of live singleton deliveries after fresh embryo transfer (ET) at a single university medical center between 2009 and 2017. We compared perinatal outcomes and placental histology in cases where assisted hatching was performed prior to ET (AH group) and cases with no AH (no AH group). RESULTS: Overall, 166 deliveries following AH were compared to 494 deliveries with no AH. Patients' demographics were similar between the groups. Median antral follicle count was significantly lower in the AH group, median 11 (range 1-50) vs. 16 (range 1-80), p < 0.001, and the primary indication for infertility treatment significantly more often diminished ovarian reserve (p < 0.001). Cycle characteristics in the AH group included a higher gonadotropin dose employed, and a lower rate of single and blastocyte transfer. Pregnancies following AH were associated with less low-lying placentas, 0.6% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.001, and comparable for other perinatal outcomes. After adjusting for confounders, the rate of bilobated placentas was higher following AH, aOR 7.10, 95% CI 1.50-33.51. The rate of perivillous depositions was higher with AH, aOR, 95% CI 3.18, 1.46-6.93, and the rate of chorangiosis lower in this group, aOR, 95% CI 0.32, 0.11-0.93. The overall rate of vascular lesions was similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: Pregnancies following AH are notable for a lower rate of placenta previa, yet a higher rate of bilobated placentas and perivillous depositions and less chorangiosis, warranting further investigation.

Comparison of the impact of laser-assisted hatching on fresh cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer and association with pregnancy outcomes.

Objective: Assisted hatching (AH) techniques can improve live birth (LB) and clinical pregnancy (CP) rates. Since there are limited data regarding this subject, we investigated the impact of laser-assisted hatching (LAH) on fresh embryo transfer (ET) and association with pregnancy outcomes in unselected patient population. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included the fresh ETs performed at our center between April 2010 and April 2019. Among 3.782 fresh ETs, 3.286 underwent LAH (n=1.583 at cleavage stage and n=1.703 at blastocyst stage) while 496 underwent non-assisted hatching (NAH) (n=213 at cleavage stage and n=283 at blastocyst stage). The ETs were performed at the blastocyst or cleavage stages, and single or double embryos were transferred. LB rate was the primary outcome, while secondary outcomes were the pregnancy test, monozygotic twinning (MZT), and CP rates. Results: The LAH and NAH groups showed similar LB, pregnancy test, CP, and MZT rates at cleavage and blastocyst stages. On the other hand, LAH significantly affected LB rates at the blastocyst stage (20.6% at blastocyst stage vs. 16% at the cleavage stage, p=0.001). Conclusion: In conclusion, LAH does not improve reproductive outcomes of fresh blastocyst-stage and cleavage-stage ETs. However, LAH significant impacts LB rates in the blastocyst stage than the cleavage stage.

The Current Practice of Assisted Hatching for Embryos in Fertility Centres: a General Survey.

At present, there is no standardised protocol for assisted hatching (AH) and the field is beset with contradictory data. We hypothesised that such contradiction may be related to inconsistencies in clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the application, preferences, and variations of AH in current clinical practice prior to embryo transfer (AHpET) and biopsy (AHpBP). An online voluntary survey, consisted of 25 questions regarding different aspects of AH, was circulated amongst different fertility centres via newsletters between October 2019 and March 2020. One-hundred twenty-nine different fertility centres participated in the survey. AHpBP was widely used (90.6% [48/53]) amongst these centres, especially for trophectoderm biopsy (92.2% [47/51]). In contrast, only 64.6% (73/113) of centres administrated AHpET; the application of AHpET was even lower in UK-based centres (36.6% [15/41]). Although laser pulses have become the predominant technique for AH, significant variation existed in the precise strategy. Zona pellucida (ZP) drilling was the main method for AHpBP, whilst both ZP drilling and ZP thinning were applied equally for AHpET. Furthermore, the ZP manipulation varied widely with regards to the size of the ZP opening and the extension of ZP thinning. This is the first representative survey relating to the current practice of AH. Laser-assisted AH is used extensively, especially for AHpBP. However, there is significant disparity in clinical practice across different centres. Future research should aim to create a standardised protocol for AH to help reduce the evident variation in clinical practice and investigate the true value of AH.

Choosing Wisely Canada: Canadian fertility and andrology society's list of top items physicians and patients should question in fertility medicine.

PURPOSE: To create a Choosing Wisely Canada list of the top 5 diagnostic and therapeutic interventions that should be questioned in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility in Canada. METHODS: The Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (CFAS) National Working Group developed an initial list of recommendations of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions that are commonly used, but are not supported by evidence, and could expose patients to unnecessary harm. These were chosen based on their prevalence, cost, potential for harm, and quality of supporting evidence. A modified Delphi consensus was used over 5 rounds to generate ideas, review supporting evidence, assess clinical relevance, estimate recommendation impact and narrow the recommendations list to 5 items. RESULTS: Fifty unique ideas were first proposed by the working group, and after 5 rounds including a survey of Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (CFAS) members, the final list of recommendations was created, including topics related to unnecessary investigations and interventions for patients with infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss, and those undergoing IVF. In this article, we describe not only the Delphi process used to determine the list, but also provide a summary of the evidence behind each of the final recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The list of five recommendations highlights opportunities to initiate conversations between clinicians and patients about the risks, benefits, harms and costs of unnecessary fertility treatments and procedures in a Canadian context.

Non-Assisted Hatching Trophectoderm Biopsy Does Not Increase The Risks of Most Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcome and May Be More Practical for Busy Clinics: Evidence From China.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted in order to investigate whether non-assisted hatching trophectoderm (TE) biopsy increases the risks of adverse perinatal outcomes in livebirths following elective single cryopreserved-thawed blastocyst transfer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 5,412 cycles from 4,908 women who achieved singleton livebirths between 2013 and 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. All embryos in this study were fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and cryopreserved through vitrification. The main intervention is to open the zona pellucida (ZP) of day 5/6 blastocyst immediately for biopsy without pre-assisted hatching. The main outcome measures are the common maternal and neonatal outcomes, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), abnormal placentation, abnormalities in umbilical cord and amniotic fluid, preterm birth, cesarean section, low birth weight, postpartum hemorrhage, and prolonged hospital stay (both mothers and infants). The generalized estimation equation (GEE) was used to control the effects of repeated measurements. The non-conditional logistic regression model was used to examine the associations between embryo biopsy status and each adverse perinatal event. Given that the selection bias and changes in learning curve might affect the results, we selected 1,086 similar (matching tolerance = 0.01) cycles from the ICSI group via propensity score matching (PSM) for second comparisons and adjustment (conditional logistic regression). RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, we confirmed that the non-assisted hatching protocol did not increase the risks of most adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite this, there were increased risks of GDM (aOR: 1.522, 95% CI: 1.141-2.031) and umbilical cord abnormalities (aOR: 11.539, 95% CI: 1.199-111.067) in the biopsy group. In the second comparisons after PSM, GDM incidence in the biopsy group was still higher (7.26% vs. 5.16%, P = 0.042), yet all measurement outcomes were equally likely to occur in both groups after the second adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: The non-assisted hatching TE biopsy does not increase the risks of most adverse perinatal outcomes. However, there is a higher GDM incidence in the biopsy group, and this association warrants further study. Considering its safety and simplicity, the non-assisted hatching protocol has the potential to become the preferred option for TE biopsy, especially in busy clinics and IVF laboratories.

Effects of in ovo feeding of disaccharide and/or methionine on hatchability, growth performance, blood hematology, and serum antioxidant parameters in geese.

A completely randomized design employing a 2 × 2 factorial experiment was designed in this study to evaluate the effects of in ovo injection of disaccharide (DS) and/or methionine (Met) on hatchability, growth performance, blood hematology, and serum antioxidant parameters in geese. A total of 600 fertilized geese's eggs containing live embryo were randomly assigned into 4 groups with 6 replicates and 25 eggs per replicate. Factors in four groups comprised noninjection, DS injection (25 g/L maltose + 25 g/L sucrose + 7.5 g/L NaCl), Met injection (5 g/L Met + 7.5 g/L NaCl), or DS plus Met injection (25 g/L maltose + 25 g/L sucrose + 5 g/L Met + 7.5 g/L NaCl), respectively. We found that the administration of DS in embryo increased hatching time, yolk sac-free carcass weight, yolk sac-free carcass indexes and decreased assisted hatching ratio, yolk sac weight, yolk sac indexes, but did not affect hatchability and mortality. Moreover, higher body weight and serum glucose concentrations in DS injection group compared with noninjection group were observed on day of hatching. The body weight and average daily gain (ADG) of geese in DS injection group were higher than noninjection group after incubation. In ovo injection of Met increased hatching time and yolk sac-free carcass indexes, but decreased yolk sac indexes. In addition, the strategy of in ovo feeding of Met led to higher body weight, ADG, serum uric acid, glutathione (GSH), and glutathione peroxidase concentrations, as well as lower GSSG/GSH ratio, serum glutathione disulfide (GSSG), and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations than the noninjection group on day of hatching. The post-hatching body weight, ADG, serum total protein, albumin, and uric acid concentrations increased, whereas post-hatching serum GSSG and MDA concentrations and GSSG/GSH ratio decreased when injected with Met. In addition, synergistic effects of in ovo injection of DS plus Met on hatching time as well as post-hatching body weight and ADG were observed. Therefore, in ovo injection of DS plus Met was demonstrated to be a way to improve the development of geese during early incubation stages.

In modern poultry husbandry, hatchery treatments and/or transportation make hatched neonates subject to encounter a fasting period after incubation. This is a big problem to limit the growth and survivability of birds. Due to the fact that birds have a relatively high metabolic rate during the initial stage after incubation, the existence of fasting period makes poultry encounter a series of challenges related to inadequate energy supply and oxidative stress. To avoid the negative effects induced by the above-mentioned problems, we injected the disaccharide, methionine, or blended disaccharide + methionine using an in ovo technology to obtain a strategy to solve the problems of inadequate energy supply and oxidative stress during the initial stage after incubation. The result of this study indicated that the in ovo injection of disaccharide + methionine was a suitable strategy to improve the development of geese during the early incubation stages.

A comparison of the clinical effects of thinning and drilling on laser-assisted hatching.

To systematically investigate the effects of two methods used for laser-assisted hatching (LAH) on clinical outcomes after day 4 (D4) on frozen-embryo-transfer (FET) cycles. Data from 11471 infertile patients who underwent FET cycles between January 2014 and October 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. The 1410 patients who met the inclusion criteria were further categorized into two groups based on the hatching procedure used: the thinning laser-assisted hatching group (T-LAH, 716 patients), and the drilling laser-assisted hatching group (D-LAH, 694 patients). The baseline characteristics of the patients were consistent between the two groups. However, the rates of implantation and clinical pregnancy were significantly higher in the T-LAH group compared to the D-LAH group (32.73% vs. 29.09%, P < 0.01, and 50.98% vs. 43.95%, P < 0.01). The proportion of live birth was also higher in the T-LAH group, but the difference was insignificant (39.11% vs. 36.89%, P > 0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences in rates of miscarriages, multiple pregnancies, ectopic pregnancies, preterm births, and congenital disabilities between the two groups. Nonetheless, significantly higher rates of implantation and pregnancy were reported in the T-LAH group compared to the D-LAH group among patients aged <35 years, patients with at least one previously failed cycle, and patients with an endometrial thickness of 8-10 mm. T-LAH is superior to D-LAH in improving clinical implantation and pregnancy outcomes in D4 FET, particularly in patients aged <35 years with at least one previously failed cycle or an endometrial thickness of 8-10 mm. The findings of this study provide theoretical support for clinical individualized diagnosis and treatment of patients with infertility.