Efficacy and safety of fractional microneedle radiofrequency for atrophic acne scars: A real-world clinical study of 126 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of fractional microneedle radiofrequency (FMR) for facial atrophic acne scars in a real-world setting. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with atrophic acne scars who had received FMR therapy from February 2018 to August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The improvement of atrophic acne scars was assessed using the ECCA Grading Scale (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS). Adverse reactions during FMR treatment were also recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMR for atrophic acne scars. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients with facial atrophic acne scars were included. A total of 590 FMR treatment sessions were accomplished, with each of 82 patients receiving 4 or more treatment sessions, and 1 receiving a maximum of 14 sessions. All patients showed improvement in symptoms after FMR treatment, with moderate to significant improvement (ECCA score reduction of 26%-100%) in 92 (73.0%) patients. As the number of treatment sessions increased, the ECCA score gradually decreased from an average of 85.6 before to 35.0 after FMR. The average scores for distortion, color, and visual analogue scale (VAS) of mMSS all showed certain reductions. The change in GAIS score indicated improvement after treatment, with minimal improvement in 16 patients (12.7%), good improvement in 57 patients (45.2%), significant improvement in 45 patients (35.7%), and optimal improvement in 8 patients (6.4%). The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the long pulse width and the number of FMR treatment sessions were positively associated with clinical efficacy. Compared to the short pulse-width group (200 ms), the longer pulse-width group (300 ms) (odds ratio [OR] = 8.3, p = 0.003) and the even longer pulse-width group (400-500 ms) (OR = 52.6, p < 0.001) demonstrated stronger efficacies. Patients who received more than three treatment sessions had better outcomes compared to those who received three or fewer treatment sessions (OR = 4.0, p = 0.036). All patients experienced posttreatment transient erythema, but no crusting, infection, or blister. Six cases developed grid-like erythema around 1 month posttreatment and one case experienced hyperpigmentation, both of which resolved within 1-3 months after appropriate management. CONCLUSION: FMR is a safe and effective treatment modality for improving facial atrophic acne scars, and the number of FMR treatment sessions and pulse width are associated with clinical efficacy.

The Effects of Oral Isotretinoin on Atrophic Acne Scars Measured by Shear-wave Elastography: An Observational, Single-center Study.

Background: Although the effects of oral isotretinoin (OI) on acne vulgaris and preventing further acne scars have been well-documented, the specific impact of OI alone on pre-existing atrophic acne scars (AAS) remains unclear. No clinical study has objectively evaluated the effect of OI on AAS yet. Objective: We sought to investigate the OI effect on AAS quantitatively and reliably by shear-wave elastography (SWE). Methods: This work is a single-center, prospective and observational study. Thirty patients with moderate and severe acne vulgaris accompanied by AAS were included. We started the OI with a standard dose regime. On Days 0 and 90 of treatment, patients' global acne grading system (GAGS) and the Goodman and Baron's Qualitative Global Scar Rating System (GSRS) were evaluated. The dermal thickness, subcutaneous tissue thickness, scar size, and scar and subcutaneous tissue's elastic modules were measured on both cheeks of each patient by SWE. Results: The improvement in GSRS stages and GAGS scores in 90 days were statistically significant (respectively; p=0.029, <0.001). Scar size and dermal thickness decreased, while the subcutaneous tissue thickness and the elastic modulus of scar and subcutaneous tissue increased in bilateral cheeks. The thickness changes in the right side dermis, and subcutaneous tissue on both sides were noteworthy (p<0.05). Conclusion: Besides its well-known effect on acne vulgaris, OI also could be an effective treatment option for reducing scar size and severity while improving skin elasticity. SWE may help follow skin and scar properties.

Efficiency and safety of microneedling fractional radiofrequency in the treatment of Chinese atrophic acne scars: A retrospective study of 3 consecutive treatments with 1-month intervals.

BACKGROUND: Atrophic acne scars (AAS) impact the aesthetic appearance, inducing social and psychological problems. Effective and safe therapy for AAS is urgently needed now. Microneedling fractional radiofrequency (MFRF) has emerged as a minimal invasive alteration for treating AAS lately, while the existing data on Chinese population was few. AIMS: We aimed to explore the effectivity and safety of MFRF in Chinese patients with facial AAS and analyze the response of different subtypes to MFRF treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from medical records and clinical photographs of 40 Chinese patients with AAS with Fitzpatrick skin type III-IV, all of them had received 3 MFRF treatments with 1-month intervals and were followed up 3 months after the last treatment. The clinical severity was assessed through échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné (ECCA) score at each visit. Clinical photographs were taken by VISIA. Patients were asked to evaluate their satisfaction of the treatment using a 5-point Likert scale at the last visit. RESULTS: ECCA score decreased more than a half at the last visit based on the baseline. Among the three types of AAS, the M-shaped scars respond most quickly to MFRF and the U-shaped scars improved the most after 3 months follow-up. A significant improvement was seen in clinical appearance, parallel to the change of ECCA, indicating the remarkable improvement of AAS after the MFRF treatment. Concomitant active acne was controlled along with the improvement of AAS. Statistics from VISIA showed excellent improvement in pores and texture as well. Side effects including pain and erythema were transient and mild. The number of MFRF treatment sessions was positively associated with the degree of improvement. Of the total 39 patients who had given a score of satisfaction, more than 89% (35 patients) were very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: To sum up, our study reveals that MFRF provides high efficiency in treating Chinese AAS patients with high satisfaction and low risk of adverse effects. M-shaped scars are the most sensitive type to the treatment, but the U-shaped scars improve most at the last visit. The simultaneous minimization of pores and improvement of skin texture imply the increased collagen stimulated by MFRF. Regular MFRF should be considered a good choice in treating AAS.

Monotherapy of Biofiller for Atrophic Acne Scars: A Prospective Nonrandomized Study.

Background: Atrophic acne scarring is an unpleasant and often permanent complication and a therapeutic challenge for dermatologists. Platelet-poor plasma (PPP) gel injections are derived from the patient's own blood and used as a "biofiller" for skin rejuvenation. Objectives: The objective was to study the efficacy and safety profile of PPP gel in atrophic acne scars. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with atrophic acne scars were included in the study. Topical anesthesia was applied on the area of interest 45 min prior to the procedure. 20 mL of blood was collected in eight sodium citrate bulbs and centrifuged to get PPP that is coagulated with heat to form gel. This gel (biofiller) was injected in the scarred areas monthly for 6 months. Patients were evaluated using Goodman and Baron Scar (GBS) scale (quantitative and qualitative), Physician Global Assessment, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at each visit. The final visit was after 3 months of the last procedure. Results: The mean value of GBS at the first visit was 28, which reduced to 8.2 at the final visit. The analysis of variance test was applied to the quantitative scale from the baseline visit to the final visit. The F value was 462.55 with a P value < 0.0001. The paired t-test was applied for the GBS quantitative scale, which showed a value of 22.86 with a P value of <0.001. Transient local side effects were noted. Conclusion: Biofiller is efficacious in improving atrophic acne scars. It is a simple, minimally invasive, cost-effective procedure with no risk of immunogenic reaction.

A combined subcision approach with either fractional CO2 laser (10,600 nm) or cross-linked hyaluronic acid versus subcision alone in atrophic post-acne scar treatment.

Different treatment options for post-acne scars exist, but with varying clinical efficacy, side effects, and prolonged downtime. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of combined subcision with either fractional CO2 laser or cross-linked hyaluronic acid filler (HA) versus subcision alone in the treatment of facial atrophic post-acne scars. Forty patients with atrophic post-acne scars were subjected to subcision on both sides of the face, then were randomly divided into three groups. Group I (20 patients): subcision combined with cross-linked HA filler injection at one side of the face; group II (20 patients): subcision followed by fractional CO2 at the other side of the face; and group III (20 patients): with subcision only as a control group. Treatment sessions were every month until clinical improvement or for maximum three sessions. The treatment's efficacy was assessed by Goodman and Baron's qualitative and quantitative grading systems. The two blinded investigator scores showed significant improvement in both the filler side versus subcision (p value = 0.015), and the fractional laser side versus subcision (p value < 0.001), with no statistically significant difference between both sides (p value = 0.171). Qualitative grading by Goodman and Baron scores showed that the percentage of patients with excellent improvement was higher in group 1 and group 2 than in group 3 with p value = 0.031; also the mean percentage of reduction in quantitative grading was higher in group 1 and group 2 than in group 3 with p value < 0.00. Either combined subcision with fractional CO2 laser or with cross-linked HA filler achieved superior improvement in facial atrophic post acne scars treatment with no serious side effects in this study. However, subcision only by blunt canula also had modest improvement.

Radiofrequency-assisted subcision combined with polycaprolactone-based dermal fillers in the management of atrophic facial acne scars: A pilot investigative study.

OBJECTIVE: The scar's appearance and psychological burden are the most esthetically challenging issues in acne vulgaris. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety profile of combined radiofrequency-assisted subcision, which, even though effective on both Icepeak and Rolling subtypes, is only mildly effective on boxcar lesions, and polycaprolactone-based dermal filler with collagen stimulation potency in managing atrophic postacne scars. METHODS: Our quasi-experimental single-arm study, after the inclusion of 10 cases over the age of 18 with moderate to severe mixed atrophic facial acne scarring, was carried out in two 3-month separate sessions, during and after the intended intervention of which the experienced lesion improvements and also adverse events were documented. Moreover, all cases were followed for 3 months after the last session, evaluating the differences in the mentioned outcomes. RESULTS: We found the combined intervention to be highly effective in improving the intended outcomes, with the total number of acne lesions (p-value < 0.001), along with the total number of Ice peak (p-value = 0.002), Rolling (p-value < 0.001), and boxcar (p-value = 0.023) lesions demonstrating statistically significant changes. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency-assisted subcision combined with polycaprolactone-based dermal fillers can be an effective intervention in managing postacne scars. However, we recommend that randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes be carried out for a more precise conclusion.

The effectiveness of fractional carbondioxyde laser and microneedle radiofrequency on acne scars.

Acne scars lead to physical and psychological problems for young adults therefore they should be treated effectively. Fractional carbon dioxide (FCL) and radiofrequency (FRFL) lasers have been both used for acne scars. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectivity and satisfaction of combined FCL and FRFL treatment for acne scars and evaluate effect of these treatments especially on atrophic scar types retrospectively. A total of 41 patients with acne scars who received FCL + FRFL were included in this study. Photographs of patients before treatment and 1 month following the last treatment session were scored by the other blinded clinician, according to the ECCA acne scar scoring method. A significant decrease was noted in clinical scores after the treatment. Side effects were minimal and acceptable. When comparing atrophic scars to erythematous ones laser treatment was more effective for atrophic types. In conclusion, our findings revealed that laser treatment with FCL + FRFL for acne scars is successful, effective and comfortable. These combination is more effective in atrophic type acne scars.

Ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Atrophic acne scars are the most common cutaneous seqaule of acne vulgaris, representing 80%-90% of all acne scars. Ablative fractional carbon dioxide (FCO2 ) laser is the gold standard treatment for atrophic scars. Additionally, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is suggested to accelerate the healing process and collagen synthesis. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy and safety of PRP combined with Ablative FCO2 laser in the treatment of moderate to severe atrophic acne scars. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have compared PRP in combination with ablative FCO2 laser to ablative FCO2 laser alone with respect to the efficacy and safety measures were included. We have systematically explored Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL databases via Ovid. The outcomes that our systematic review sought to evaluate were clinical improvement, patient satisfaction, and Goodman and Baron's qualitative acne scar score. The dichotomous outcomes were presented as odds ratio (OR) while the continuous outcomes were presented as standardized mean difference (SMD). Eleven RCTs that represents 313 participants were included. The combined use of laser and PRP showed a statistically significant clinical improvement and patient satisfaction compared to the use of laser alone (OR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.37-4.78 and OR = 3.38, 95% CI 1.80-6.34, respectively). Also, a significant improvement in Goodman and Baron's score was achieved by combining PRP with laser (SMD = -0.40, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.14). The combined treatment of laser and PRP was highly synergistic, effective, and safe in treating moderate to severe atrophic acne scars.

Adapalene/benzoyl peroxide gel 0.3%/2.5% for acne vulgaris

Acne vulgaris is typically treated with a combination of a topical retinoid plus an antimicrobial agent, as recommended by national and international evidence-based guidelines around the globe. Adapalene, a synthetic topical retinoid, is available in two concentrations (0.1% and 0.3%) and in once-daily fixed-dose combinations with benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 2.5%. Adapalene 0.3%/BPO 2.5% is approved for use for moderate-to-severe acne with proven efficacy, good safety and tolerability across a spectrum of patient variables (different ages, genders, and skin types) and disease severity. While some patients experience issues with transient tolerability during retinoid and BPO therapy, it is our clinical experience that good patient education to set expectations and provide strategies to minimize irritation can overcome the majority of issues. This article reviews the data supporting the use of adapalene 0.3%/2.5% in practice, including the complementary mechanism of action of adapalene and BPO, clinical data from a range of settings, and key aspects of patient education.

Successful Topical Application of Botulinum Toxin After Microneedling Versus Microneedling Alone for the Treatment of Atrophic Post Acne Scars: A Prospective, Split-face, Controlled Study.

Background: Acne scars are a source of cosmetic concern for most of the patients. Objective: We sought to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of topical botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) application immediately after microneedling (Mn) versus Mn with saline in the treatment of atrophic acne scars. Methods: Forty patients with atrophic acne scars (rolling, boxcar, and mixed types) were enrolled in a split-face study; microneedling was performed on both sides of the face followed by an application of topically diluted botulinum toxin on one side (Side A) and saline on the other (Side B) for two sessions both two weeks apart. Evaluation was done at baseline, two and four weeks after the session. Follow-up was performed after six months. The assessments included blinded clinical assessment and patient's satisfaction. Results: After the treatment, acne scars in (Side A) showed 70 percent overall improvement versus zero percent in Side B (P<0.0001). A statistically highly significant reduction of acne scars severity occurred in (Side A) (P=0.0008). Patient's satisfaction was higher in (Side A) (P<0.0001). No serious side effects were reported. Conclusion: Microneedling delivery of BTX-A could be simple, safe, and innovative modality improving the appearance and decrease the depth of atrophic acne scars.

Treatment of acne scars with fractional carbon dioxide laser in Asians: a retrospective study to search for predicting factors associated with efficacy.

Ablative fractional laser treatment has been extensively used for resurfacing atrophic acne scars. However, few studies have investigated how the parameters set during laser procedures affect efficacy. In this retrospective study, we examined the relationship between efficacy and Fitzpatrick skin type, gender, age, follow-up duration, energy, and treatment sessions utilizing ablative fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser in Asians with Fitzpatrick skin types III-IV. We then analyzed the relationship between outcome and adverse effects including hyperpigmentation. Three blinded dermatologists used the ECCA (Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acnluation Clinique des Cicospectively review 82 of 1034 patients who presented at our institution for atrophic acne scar treatment between August 2013 and August 2019. Factors associated with efficacy, including age, gender, Fitzpatrick skin type, energy, treatment sessions, follow-up duration, and pigmentation, were analyzed. 82 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients underwent one to three CO2 laser treatment sessions. Parameter settings for individual patients were consistent across treatments. Mean ECCA scores decreased from 102.70 ± 24.95 to 87.28 ± 24.48 (p ≤ 0.001). The number of treatment sessions and duration of pigmentation lasting shorter than 3 months positively correlated with better outcomes. All patients had erythema, which lasted longer than 3 months in 16 patients (19.51%). Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) affected 60 patients (73.17%) and lasted longer than 3 months in 26 patients (31.71%). One patient experienced hypopigmentation (1.22%), while 8 experienced acne flare-up (9.76%). Post-laser scars occurred in 2 patients (2.44%). Our data suggest that in atrophic acne scar treatment in Asians using fractional CO2 laser, 3 treatment sessions and duration of hyperpigmentation within 3 months have better outcomes regardless of energy, gender, age, Fitzpatrick skin type, follow-up duration, and disease course.

Single session of combined microfat and subcision in the treatment of Grade 4 atrophic acne scars.

BACKGROUND: Severe atrophic acne scars (AAS) remain the "Achilles's heel" of AAS treatment. The combination of microfat and subcision treatment is a potential solution for severe AAS. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined microfat and subcision treatment for severe (Grade 4) AAS. METHODS: Data of patients with Grade 4 AAS who underwent combined microfat and subcision treatment between September 2016 and December 2020 were reviewed. Post-treatment evaluation was performed at least 3 months postoperatively. The severity of AAS was graded based on Goodman's qualitative classification. The volume of concavities was measured using an Antera 3D camera. Complications were documented. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients received a single treatment session. Excellent response was observed in 5 (11.9%) patients, very good in 13 (31.0%), good in 22 (52.4%), and poor response in 2 (4.7%). The average reduction of the total volume of concavities was 28.0%. The most common minor side effects were mild swelling and bruising. No major complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Combined microfat and subcision treatment is a safe and effective treatment for severe AAS. The approach will be a significant treatment for severe AAS.

A Prospective, Nonrandomized, Open-label Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Fractional CO2 Laser versus Fractional Microneedling Radio Frequency in Acne Scars.

BACKGROUND: Acne scar is a distressing psychosocial problem, and it has a negative effect on the quality of life. Although variety of approaches are available, demand of less invasive and more effective ways for their treatment is needed. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess and compare the clinical safety, efficacy, and tolerability of fractional carbon dioxide (FCO2) laser versus fractional microneedling radio frequency (MNRF) in the management of acne scars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a prospective, observational, nonrandomized, open-labeled study of total 50 patients selected according to Goodman and Baron global qualitative acne scar grading, and they were divided into two groups of 25 each, having Fitzpatrick skin type III-V. A total of four sessions were given for both the groups at an interval of 2 months. The assessment was done by the treating physician as well as by the blinded physician. Both the subjective and the objective assessment was done at the last follow up given at second month of the fourth session. RESULTS: The mean score of 25 patients in each group of FCO2 and fractional MNRF, decreased from 29.24 to 10.7 (i.e., 63.41%) and from 33.24 to 13.04 (i.e., 60.72%), respectively, as calculated by Goodman and Baron quantitative grading assessed by the treating physician (P = 0.0001). Grade 4 (>75%) improvement was shown by four patients and Grade 3 improvement (51%-75%) was shown by 14 patients among FCO2 group, and similarly Grade 4 (>75%) improvement was shown by three patients and Grade 3 improvement (51%-75%) was shown by 12 patients among MNRF group, as observed by a blinded physician (P = 0.689). CONCLUSION: Both modalities are equally effective in the treatment of acne scars; however, fractional MNRF having lesser down time and Post inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) among darker skin shades, with good patient satisfaction score, makes it an efficient and safer treatment option as compared to FCO2.

Role of Microneedling in Atrophic Post-Acne Scars: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Objective To evaluate the outcomes of microneedling in patients with atrophic post-acne scars. Methodology A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Dermatology, Patel Hospital for a duration of six months. Patients who were diagnosed with moderate to severe-grade atrophic acne scars were enrolled in the study. Patients with a history of photosensitivity, systemic lupus erythematosus, and xeroderma pigmentosum were excluded from the study. Goodman and Baron's acne scar-grading system was used to evaluate the degree of atrophic scarring. A total of three sessions divided into four weekly intervals were conducted. The scar-grading was done before the procedure and after three treatment sessions using Goodman and Baron's acne scar grading system. Results A total of 50 patients were included in this study; 36 (72%) were females and 14 (28%) were males, with a mean age of 30.92±6.19 years. A decrease in the acne scar-grade was noted from grade III to grade II after three sessions of treatment. A significantly higher number of patients were in grade II after three-month sessions compared with before treatment (p=0.009), and a significantly lesser number of patients were in grade III (p=0.045). A significantly higher proportion of patients with moderate acne scars, as compared to severe, were in grade II (77.3% vs. 22.7%; p<0.001). Conclusion In this study, we found an improvement in the scar grade after microneedling sessions. However, as the study was retrospective, we suggest prospective randomized controlled trials in our set-up to better uncover the role of microneedling in reducing acne scars.

Benefits of fractional radiofrequency treatment in patients with atrophic acne scars - Literature review.

OBJECTIVE: Acne scars carry a huge physical and psychological impact on people. This article aims to evaluate the role of fractional radiotherapy in treatment of atrophic acne scars. The main objective includes providing an up-to-date review of existing literature, presenting the most significant studies conducted in this field. METHODS: In order to study the impact of fractional radiotherapy on the appearance of atrophic acne scars, we conducted a search on Pubmed using the keywords "fractional radiotherapy", combined with/or "acne", "atrophic acne scars" and "acne scars" and found 75 papers, from which we selected 39. RESULTS: There are several therapeutic approaches for the improvement of acne scars with variable results and possible side effects. Fractional radiofrequency system has been used widely in the last years, as it turned out to be an effective treatment method, either in combination with other modalities, or alone. CONCLUSION: There are no generalized clinical guidelines adopted to standardize atrophic acne scar treatment. The multiple therapeutic options available create a dilemma in choosing the proper method in order to enhance its efficacy and to minimize its risks. The accumulated experience in nonablative collagen stimulating devices like fractional radiofrequency has proven that thickening of interstitial fibers in the dermis is possible with a controlled thermal injury, without epidermal damage and development of side effects.

Efficacy of stem cell-conditioned medium vs. platelet-rich plasma as an adjuvant to ablative fractional CO2 laser resurfacing for atrophic post-acne scars: a split-face clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the impact of using topical stem cell-conditioned medium (SC-CM) after fractional carbon dioxide laser (FCL) vs. combined FCL and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or FCL alone in treatment of atrophic acne scars. METHODS: Thirty-three patients were randomly divided into two split-face groups. Group I (n = 17) received FCL plus topical SC-CM on one side or FCL plus saline on the other. Group II (n = 16) received FCL plus topical PRP or SC-CM. All patients had three monthly sessions. Clinical assessment was done at each visit, with a final assessment after 3 months. Skin biopsies were obtained for histological and quantitative molecular analysis after treatment. RESULTS: No significant difference in clinical improvement of acne scars was observed between the FCL/SC-CM and FCL only sides (p = .63), while better and faster improvement was detected on FCL/PRP side compared to FCL/SC-CM side (p = .006). There was no significant difference in downtime or adverse effects between the treated sides in either group. Dermal collagen was increased and procollagen type I gene was upregulated in both FCL/PRP and FCL/SC-CM sides compared to FCL only sides (p = .001 and p = .041, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Topical SC-CM could potentially enhance the efficacy of FCL. However, PRP seems to be a better alternative.

Self-contrast study of pinprick therapy combined with super pulse fractional CO2 laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scars.

AIMS: This study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a "double-layer" mode of super pulse fractional CO2 laser and a combined treatment of pinprick therapy with fractional CO2 laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scars. METHODS: A split-face and self-contrast method was applied. A total of 20 patients with atrophic acne scars randomly received the above mentioned therapy on the left or right side of the cheek for 3 times with an interval of 3 months. ECCA scores, IVA scores, patients' satisfaction, VAS scores, and adverse reactions were evaluated. RESULTS: Atrophic acne scars on both sides of the cheek were improved obviously. The ECCA scores showed a significant decrease, while IVA scores significantly increased. Compared with the super pulse fractional CO2 laser group, the decrease of ECCA scores, the increase of IVA scores, and the patients' satisfaction were significantly higher and improvement on V-shaped and U-shaped acne scars was significantly better in the combined treatment group. No patients had severe adverse reactions such as blister, infection, or hypertrophic scars. CONCLUSIONS: Super pulse fractional CO2 laser and pinprick treatment combined with fractional CO2 laser are both safe and effective therapy for the treatment of atrophic acne scars.

Combined autologous platelet-rich plasma with microneedling versus microneedling with non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: Split-face study.

Acne scarring causes cosmetic discomfort, depression, low self-esteem and reduced quality of life. Microneedling is an established treatment for scars. A multimodality approach to scar treatment is usually necessary to achieve the best cosmetic results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of platelet rich plasma (PRP) combined with microneedling in comparison with microneedling with non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid for the treatment of atrophic acne scars. Forty-one patients of 20-40 years of age with atrophic acne scars were included. Microneedling was performed on both halves of the face. Topical application of PRP was given on right half of the face, while the left half of the face was treated with topical application of non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid. Four treatment sessions were given at an interval of 1 month consecutively. Goodman's Qualitative scale and the quartile grading scale are used for the final evaluation of results. There was a statistically significant improvement in acne scars after treatment among the studied group. Right and left halves showed 85.4% and 82.9% improvement, So the difference of the improvement between the two modalities is statistically insignificant P > 0.05 We conclude that microneedling has efficacy in the management of atrophic acne scars. It can be combined with either PRP or noncross-linked hyaluronic acid to enhance the final clinical outcomes in comparison with microneedling alone. The difference between the two modalities is insignificant.

Treatment of atrophic acne scars using autologous platelet-rich plasma vs combined subcision and autologous platelet-rich plasma: A split-face comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple therapeutic approaches are usually required when treating atrophic acne scars. Subcision was reported to be of value in improving rolling scars. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has recently been proposed as an adjuvant treatment option for atrophic acne scars with few reports evaluating its efficacy. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the effect of intradermal injection of PRP vs combined PRP and subcision in the treatment of atrophic acne scars. METHODS: Thirty patients with bilateral atrophic acne scars were enrolled. Each patient received three monthly sessions. Each side of the face was randomly treated either with intradermal PRP alone or with combined treatment with subcision followed by PRP injection. Patients were assessed at 3 and 6 months following the last treatment session. Evaluation of serial photographs was performed by two blinded investigators. RESULTS: Platelet-rich plasma alone showed a better response, fewer side effects, and shorter downtime compared to combined subcision and PRP. CONCLUSION: Autologous PRP injection can be a therapeutic option in the treatment of atrophic acne scars, with fewer complications and better tolerability than combined subcision and autologous PRP.

A Meta-analysis of the Evidence for Assisted Therapy with Platelet-Rich Plasma for Atrophic Acne Scars.

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have investigated the role of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an assisted therapy for atrophic acne scars. However, the results are diverse, and no up-to-date meta-analysis was found that exclusively examined atrophic acne scar treatment. OBJECTIVES: To perform a meta-analysis to assess improvements in the side effects of PRP and the effect of assisted therapy for atrophic acne scars. METHODS: This study followed PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out in September 2018 using the electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Seven articles were included in this review. All of the studies published utilized PRP as additive therapy. The major therapies included fractional carbon laser therapy and microneedling. Five studies (249 participants) reported four degrees of improvement on an improvement scale (degrees 3 and 4 were considered improvement in this analysis). Four studies (200 participants) reported mean improvement scores. A significantly higher degree of improvement was shown in the PRP group compared to the control group (OR = 8.19; 95% CI 4.32-15.52; p < 0.00001), as well as better mean improvement score (WMD = 23.73; 95% CI 18.60-28.87; p < 0.00001). Substantial heterogeneity was seen in the degree of improvement (I2 = 54% p = 0.07) and the mean improvement score (I2 = 75%; p = 0.008). There were overall fewer monitored side effects, including erythema and edema (in days), in the PRP groups; however, no significance was found. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that PRP is a useful assisted therapy for atrophic acne scars, which can achieve better improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.