Deep convolutional neural network model ResNeSt for discrimination of papillary thyroid carcinomas and benign nodules in thyroid nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance.

Background: A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model was employed for the differentiation of thyroid nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) according to the 2023 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of ResNeSt in improving the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy. Methods: Fragmented images were used to train and test DCNN models. A training dataset was built from 1,330 samples diagnosed as papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) or benign nodules, and a test dataset was built from 173 samples diagnosed as AUS. ResNeSt was trained and tested to provide a differentiation. With regard to AUS samples, the characteristics of the cell nuclei were compared using the Wilcoxon test. Results: The ResNeSt model achieved an accuracy of 92.49% (160/173) on fragmented images and 84.78% (39/46) from a patient wise viewpoint in discrimination of PTC and benign nodules in AUS nodules. The sensitivity and specificity of ResNeSt model were 95.79% and 88.46%. The κ value between ResNeSt and the pathological results was 0.847 (P<0.001). With regard to the cell nuclei of AUS nodules, both area and perimeter of malignant nodules were larger than those of benign ones, which were 2,340.00 (1,769.00, 2,807.00) vs. 1,941.00 (1,567.50, 2,455.75), P<0.001 and 190.46 (167.64, 208.46) vs. 171.71 (154.95, 193.65), P<0.001, respectively. The grayscale (0 for black, 255 for white) of malignant lesions was lower than that of benign ones, which was 37.52 (31.41, 46.67) vs. 45.84 (31.88, 57.36), P <0.001, indicating nuclear staining of malignant lesions were deeper than benign ones. Conclusions: In summary, the DCNN model ResNeSt showed great potential in discriminating thyroid nodules diagnosed as AUS. Among those nodules, malignant nodules showed larger and more deeply stained nuclei than benign nodules.

Malignant risk of pediatric Bethesda category III thyroid nodules subcategorized by nuclear atypia and other: A single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: The 2023 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) divides AUS diagnoses into two major subcategories: atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) nuclear atypia (AUS-N) and other (AUS-O). This study aims to compare the histological outcome and malignant rate of pediatric AUS thyroid nodules classified into AUS-N and AUS-O subcategories. DESIGN: A search of our institutional electronic pathology database for the period from January 2012 to July 2023 was conducted to identify pediatric (<21 years old) thyroid nodules that were interpreted as AUS and subsequently had surgery. Cases were further divided into AUS-N and AUS-O subcategories. Results of follow-up surgical resections were collected. The malignant rate was calculated and compared between AUS-N and AUS-O groups. RESULTS: The study identified 62 thyroid nodules from 58 pediatric patients. Among these nodules, 29 and 33 were subcategorized as AUS-N and AUS-O, respectively. Both groups exhibited a female predominance and displayed a similar nodule size distribution. Histological analysis revealed 15 carcinomas in AUS-N nodules, including 11 cases of classic papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and four cases of follicular type of PTC. In contrast, in the AUS-O group, a total of five carcinomas were documented, including two PTCs and three oncocytic thyroid carcinomas. Notably, the malignant rate of AUS-N nodules (52%) is significantly higher than that of AUS-O nodules (15%) (p = .002). CONCLUSION: In pediatric AUS thyroid nodules, the malignant risk in AUS-N is significantly higher than that in AUS-O. These findings may guide more appropriate clinical triage and/or improve management of pediatric patients with AUS thyroid nodules.

Ultrasonographic Characteristics of Thyroid Nodules with Nondiagnostic and Atypia of Undetermined Significance in Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate ultrasound (US) features of thyroid nodules categorized as nondiagnostic (ND) and atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) according to the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) and their potential implications for clinical management. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent thyroid nodules FNAC between 2019 and 2023. Nodules falling into the ND and AUS categories were analyzed for US features, nodule size, composition, echogenicity, shape, margin, echogenic foci, the distribution of the American College of Radiology's Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) categories, and other parameters. The study included a total of 1,199 patients and 1,252 nodules (ND: 1110; AUS: 142). Results: No significant differences in age, gender, nodule features, echogenicity, shape, margin, echogenic foci, TI-RADS scores, localization, number of nodules, or thyroid parenchymal disease presence were found between the ND and AUS categories (p > 0.05). Also, no statistically significant difference in nodule size (<10 mm vs. ≥10 mm) existed between the ND and AUS categories (p = 0.475). Both showed predominantly solid composition and hyperechoic/isoechoic echogenicity. High proportions of TI-RADS 4 nodules were observed in both groups, with 727 (65.5%) in ND and 95 (66.9%) in AUS. Conclusion: This study found no statistically significant differences in US characteristics between the ND and AUS categories, indicating potential similarities in their radiological appearances. Also, no significant difference in nodule size (<10 mm and ≥10 mm) was observed between these categories. Clinical management should consider further investigations, including repeat FNAC, due to the diagnostic challenges and malignancy risk in both categories.

Exploring the atypia of undetermined significance: Malignant ratio, ThyroSeq v3 positive call rate, molecular-derived risk of malignancy, and risk of malignancy as possible quality metric tools in thyroid cytology.

BACKGROUND: The atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) category is heterogeneous, leading to variations in its use. To prevent excessive usage, the AUS rate should be ≤10%. Although this recommendation aims to maintain diagnostic quality, it lacks supporting data. The AUS:Malignant (AUS:M) ratio has been proposed as a metric tool to evaluate AUS use. Furthermore, integrating ThyroSeq v3 (TSV3) positive call rate (PCR) and the molecular-derived risk of malignancy (MDROM) have been put forward as performance improvement tools. The authors reviewed their AUS:M ratios, TSV3 PCR, MDROM, and ROM. METHODS: Thyroid aspirates evaluated in the laboratory (from August 2022 to September 2023) by seven cytopathologists (CPs) were identified. AUS:M ratio, MDROM, ROM, and TSV3 PCR results for the laboratory and each CP were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2248 aspirates were identified (462 AUS and 80 malignant). The AUS:M ratio for the laboratory was 5.8 (CPs range, 2.8 to 7.3). The TSV3 PCR for the laboratory was 23% (CPs range, 11% to 41%). The MDROM for the laboratory was 19% (CPs range, 9% to 31%), whereas the ROM was 36% (CPs range, 29% to 50%). Linear regression analysis of AUS:M ratio versus TSV3 PCR and MDROM demonstrated a moderate positive correlation but a weak negative correlation to the ROM. Deviations from established targets were attributed to multiple factors. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study underscore the importance of using a combination of metrics to evaluate diagnostic practices. By dissecting the practice patterns of each CP, the authors can measure different aspects of their performance and provide individualized feedback.

Evaluating Postoperative Outcomes and Investigating the Usefulness of EU-TIRADS Scoring in Managing Pediatric Thyroid Nodules Bethesda 3 and 4

Objective: The aim was to assess postoperative outcomes in pediatric thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) or suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (SFN) and their respective the European-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (EU-TIRADS) scores. Methods: Forty-four pediatric patients at a single center with thyroid nodules classified as AUS/FLUS or SFN from August 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on demographics, thyroid function, nodule size, and ultrasonographic features were collected. Postoperative pathologies were categorized into benign, low-risk, and malignant neoplasms according to the World Health Organization 2022 criteria, and EU-TIRADS was used for retrospective radiological scoring. Results: Among 21 (47.7%) of patients who had surgical intervention, 72% had Bethesda 3 and 28% had Bethesda 4 thyroid nodules. Post-surgical histopathological classifications were 43% benign, 19% low-risk, and 38% malignant. Of note, EU-TIRADS 3 and 5 scores were present in 44% and 56% of the benign cases, respectively. Malignant cases tended to produce higher EU-TIRADS scores, with 64% rated as EU-TIRADS 5. Bethesda category 4 nodules had a 66% malignancy rate, significantly higher than the 27% in category 3. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of histologically benign cases were classified as EU-TIRADS 5, suggesting that EU-TIRADS may lead to unnecessary biopsies in benign cases. Malignant cases were more likely to have a higher EU-TIRADS score, indicating a positive correlation with malignancy risk, particularly in Bethesda 4 cases. However, the EU-TIRADS system's predictive value for malignancy in Bethesda 3 cases was poorer.

Diagnostic models for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda Category III in an endemic region.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to develop a diagnostic model to help physicians determine whether thyroid nodules categorized as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) in category III of the Bethesda system are benign or malignant preoperatively. To create a diagnostic model for predicting thyroid nodules' benign or malignant with AUS cytology based on clinical, ultrasonographic, and cytopathological findings. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study involving patients (>19) at risk of thyroid cancer who had thyroidectomy after an AUS cytology. The dataset consists of 53 variables 204 nodules from 183 patients. Binary logistic regression and factor analysis methods were used to identify risk factors for malignancy. Finally, four prediction models were developed using different approaches, based on clinical, pathological clinical + pathological, and the factors. RESULTS: A total of 88 (48.1%) of 183 patients diagnosed with AUS were benign and 95 (51.9%) the malignant. After determining risk factors, four prediction models were developed based on different approaches to assist physicians in deciding to detect AUS nodules early. It was seen that bilaterality was found to be a risk factor for malignancy in the clinical model (pbilaterality = .03) and it was also seen that the pathological variables pale chromatin and irregular contours in the oncocyte variables were risk factors for malignancy (ppalechromatin = .02, pirregularcontoursintheoncocyte = .04). The best model obtained sensitivity and specificity values are 73% and 87% based on clinical and pathological variables. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive study may provide a more in-depth understanding of AUS and make a notable contribution to healthcare professionals before surgery.

A Comprehensive Approach to the Thyroid Bethesda Category III (AUS) in the Transition Zone Between 2nd Edition and 3rd Edition of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: Subcategorization, Nuclear Scoring, and More.

Significant interobserver variabilities exist for Bethesda category III: atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). Thus, subcategorization of AUS including AUS "nuclear" and AUS "other" is proposed in the recent 3rd edition of TBSRTC. This study investigated the impact of the nuclear features/architectural features/nuclear score (NS) (3-tiered)/subcategories and subgroups on risk of malignancy (ROM) in thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNA). 6940 FNAs were evaluated. 1224 (17.6%) cases diagnosed as AUS were reviewed, and 240 patients (initial FNAs of 260 nodules and 240 thyroidectomies) were included. Subcategories and subgroups were defined according to TBSRTC 2nd and 3rd editions. Histological diagnostic groups included nonneoplastic disease, benign neoplasm, low-risk neoplasm, and malignant neoplasm. Overall, ROM was 30.7%. ROM was significantly higher in FNAs with nuclear overlapping (35.5%), nuclear molding (56.9%), irregular contours (42.1%), nuclear grooves (74.1%), chromatin clearing (49.4%), and chromatin margination (57.7%), and these features were independent significant predictors for malignancy. FNAs with NS3 had significantly higher ROM (64.2%). Three-dimensional groups were significantly more frequent in malignant neoplasms (35.7%). ROM was significantly higher in AUS-nuclear subcategory (48.2%) and in AUS-nuclear and architectural subcategory (38.3%). The highest ROM was detected in AUS-nuclear1 subgroup (65.2%). ROM was significantly higher in the group including AUS-nuclear and AUS-nuclear and architectural subcategories, namely "high-risk group" than the group including other subcategories, namely "low-risk group" (42.0%vs 13.9%). In conclusion, subcategorization may not be the end point, and nuclear scoring and evaluation of architectural patterns according to strict criteria may provide data for remodeling of TBSRTC categories.

An economically efficient strategy for diagnosing atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance thyroid nodules with ultrasound-based risk stratification systems and BRAFV600E testing.

Background: The management of thyroid nodules classified as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) has been a subject of ongoing debate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate a cost-effective approach for managing these nodules by combining BRAFV600E mutation analysis with the guidelines provided by the American Thyroid Association (ATA) or the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS). Methods: This study included 762 AUS/FLUS nodules in 551 patients with a postoperative pathology. A preoperative BRAFV600E gene test and an evaluation using the ATA guidelines and ACR-TIRADS were performed. Two combined diagnostic approaches were employed: In method 1, all nodules underwent BRAFV600E gene testing, and nodules testing positive for BRAFV600E or for risk stratification systems (RSSs) were diagnosed as malignant, while those with negative results in both tests were considered benign. In method 2 (modified combination method), nodules were reclassified into low-risk (category 2 and 3 in the ATA guidelines and ACR-TIRADS), medium-risk (category 4), and high-risk (category 5) groups based on the malignancy rate of the RSSs. BRAFV600E gene testing was applied only with the medium-risk group. Nodules with positive BRAFV600E mutation were upgraded to the high-risk group, while negative cases remained in the medium-risk group. Results: Both malignancy rates and positive BRAFV600E mutation rates increased with the increase in RSS category (P<0.001). The combination of ACR with BRAFV600E gene testing significantly improved the area under the curve (AUC) compared to the use of ACR or BRAFV600E alone (the AUCs for ACR combined with BRAFV600E, modified ACR combined with BRAFV600E, ACR alone, and BRAFV600E alone were 0.875, 0.878, 0.832, and 0.839, respectively; P<0.05 for both combinations vs. ACR or BRAFV600E alone). Similarly, ATA combined with BRAFV600E showed significant improvements in AUC compared to ATA alone (the AUCs for ATA combined with BRAFV600E, modified ATA combined with BRAFV600E, and ATA alone were 0.851, 0.846, 0.809, respectively; P<0.001 for both combination methods vs. ATA alone), but there was no significant difference observed compared to using BRAFV600E alone (P=0.450 and P=0.680 for both combination methods vs. BRAFV600E). Notably, the AUC of ACR combined with BRAFV600E was greater than that of ATA combined with BRAFV600E (P=0.047 and P=0.007 for both combination methods, respectively). There were no significant differences in diagnostic performance between the two combination approaches (P=0.428 for ACR combined with BRAFV600E and P=0.314 for ATA combined with BRAFV600E). Performing BRAFV600E gene testing only on the medium-risk groups (modified combination method) significantly reduced the rate of BRAFV600E gene testing (P<0.001) without increasing the false-negative rate (P=0.818 and P=0.394 for ACR and ATA, respectively). Conclusions: Incorporating the BRAFV600E gene test exclusively for nodules in the medium-risk group significantly improved diagnostic efficacy, reduced the utilization of gene tests, and maintained a consistent false-negative rate.

Two-tier subclassification of the Bethesda category III (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance) in thyroid cytology.

BACKGROUND: The Bethesda category III, AUS/FLUS, comprises a heterogeneous group of thyroid lesions with variable risk of malignancy (ROM). This study evaluates ROM in two subgroups of this category based on nuclear atypia and architectural atypia. METHODS: Cases in Bethesda category III were reported based on nuclear atypia (AUS) and architectural atypia (FLUS). ROM was calculated by comparing the cytologic diagnosis to the follow-up histologic diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 610 Bethesda category III cases in this study, 306 (50.2%) and 304 (49.8%) cases were reported as AUS and FLUS, respectively. One hundred and eighty six of 306 AUS (60.8%) and 193 of 304 FLUS (63.5%) cases underwent surgical intervention. ROM of the cases in Bethesda category III was 12.8% if all cases were counted and 20.6% if only surgical cases were counted. When analyzing separately, ROM of AUS cases was 17.0% and 28.0% with all cases and surgical cases only, respectively. For FLUS cases, ROM was 8.6% and 13.5% with all cases and surgical cases only, respectively. CONCLUSION: In Bethesda category III, ROM in the cases with nuclear atypia was significantly higher than the cases with architectural atypia. Sub-classifying the Bethesda Category III cases with nuclear atypia and architectural atypia, respectively may better stratify the ROM.

Binary subclassification scheme (AUS-Nuclear versus AUS-Other) adequately risk-stratifies thyroid fine needle aspiration specimens classified as Atypia of Undetermined Significance.

INTRODUCTION: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology previously described 4 subclasses of atypia within the Atypia of Undetermined Significance (AUS) category: nuclear (AUS-Nuc), architectural (AUS-A), oncocytic (AUS-Onc), and atypia not otherwise specified (AUS-NOS). Accumulating evidence supports a binary AUS subclassification scheme based primarily on the presence of nuclear atypia only. The purpose of this study is to compare the risk stratification of binary versus 4-tier AUS subclassification systems among AUS nodules with molecular and/or histologic follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thyroid aspirates classified as AUS and tested using Afirma (Veracyte, Inc.) between 6/2013 and 7/2021 were included. For resected nodules, histological classification was considered as the final outcome. For unresected nodules, benign Afirma results were considered low-risk outcomes, similar to histologically benign nodules. Suspicious or nondiagnostic Afirma results were considered indeterminate outcomes. The prevalence of outcomes warranting surgery (noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features [NIFTP] or cancer) was calculated for each AUS subclass. RESULTS: A total of 559 AUS nodules with Afirma testing were identified. Excluding nodules with indeterminate molecular outcomes, NIFTP/cancer prevalence for AUS-Nuc was 21% (57/266), which was higher than that for AUS-A (6%, 11/188), AUS-Onc (8%, 4/53), and AUS-NOS (0%, 0/9). A binary AUS subclassification scheme based on nuclear atypia showed a significant difference in NIFTP/cancer prevalence (21% versus 6%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Binary reporting of AUS subclasses based on nuclear atypia distinguishes cases with a higher risk of NIFTP/cancer. There is a low but non-negligible prevalence of NIFTP/cancer in cases without nuclear atypia.

The risk of malignancy in the atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) category subgroups: a Thai institute experience.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the rate of reporting and the risk of malignancy (ROM) for atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) subgroups in a Thai population. AUS, which is category III of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, is a problematic diagnosis for thyroid nodule management because the risks of malignancy are diverse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent thyroid fine needle aspirations between January 2015 and December 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Gender, age, and nodule features were described, and all slides were re-evaluated and categorized into 2 subgroups: AUS-Nuclear (including cytology atypia and cytologic and architectural atypia) and AUS-Other (including architectural atypia, oncocytic atypia, and atypia not otherwise specified). The lower and upper limits of ROM were calculated for each subgroup. RESULTS: Of total, 258 out of 2995 fine needle aspirations (8.6%) were diagnosed as AUS. The patients were predominantly female (88.9%), with a mean age of 54.1 years. The average nodule size was 2.5 cm. Of the 258 AUS patients, 81 (38.9%) had histological correlations. The ROM for the AUS category was 9.1% to 23.5%. The ROM of the AUS-Nuclear and AUS-Other were 11.1% to 27.3% and 2.2% to 6.7%, respectively. Features of pseudonuclear inclusions had the highest ROM (33.3%-42.9%), followed by pale chromatin (28.57%-47.06%). CONCLUSIONS: Less than ten percent of our interpretations were AUS, which is acceptable in our practice. Cytological atypia harbored the highest ROM. Studies of associations between cytology and histology may aid in improving diagnostic criteria for this population.

Use of the Afirma Xpression Atlas for cytologically indeterminate, Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier suspicious thyroid nodules: Clinicopathologic analysis with postoperative molecular testing.

OBJECTIVES: Afirma has recently introduced its Xpression Atlas (XA) as an adjunct to its Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) for risk stratification of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. We evaluated the performance of Afirma XA and associated pathologic findings for Afirma GSC suspicious nodules. METHODS: Intradepartmental records of thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) from January 2021 to December 2022 were identified and reviewed for patient and nodule characteristics, FNA findings, molecular test results, and final surgical pathology, if available. RESULTS: Material for Afirma GSC testing was collected in 624 thyroid FNAs, and 148 (24%) were classified as cytologically indeterminate. Afirma GSC testing was successful in 132 (89%) of those cases, of which 35 (27%) were Afirma GSC suspicious. Afirma XA testing was positive in 11 cases (11/35 [31%]). Eight (73%) patients underwent surgery that revealed 7 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma and 1 patient with noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) (risk of malignancy: 100% [8/8]). Among the 24 patients with negative Afirma XA results, 19 (79%) underwent surgery, revealing 5 patients with malignancy and 3 patients with NIFTP (risk of malignancy: 42% [8/19]). Overall, the risk of malignancy for Afirma GSC suspicious nodules was 59% (16/27). CONCLUSIONS: Afirma XA improved risk stratification of thyroid disease with a high risk of malignancy in Afirma GSC suspicious nodules. A negative Afirma XA result, however, should not be used as a rule-out test.

Diagnostic accuracy of flow cytometry in detecting malignant epithelial cells in serous effusions.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of flow cytometry (FCM) in detecting malignant epithelial cells in serous effusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flow cytometric assessment of 96 serous fluids (86 ascitic, 10 pleural) was performed by using epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) (in all 96 fluids) and MUC-1 (in a subgroup of 40 fluids) as epithelial markers and CD45 and CD14 as leucocyte markers. The percentage of EpCAM positivity and MUC-1 positivity was calculated in the CD14 and CD45 dual negative population by selective gating. The findings were then correlated with the defined gold standard criteria. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy for EpCAM was found to be 92.06%, 96.96%, 98.31%, 86.48%, and 93.75%, respectively, while that for MUC-1 was 79.16%, 93.75%, 95%, 71.4%, and 85%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy for dual positivity for EpCAM and MUC-1 was found to be 83.3%, 100%, 100%, 80%, and 90% respectively. On combining FCM with cytomorphology the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy all increased greatly to 95.3%, 100%, 100%, 91.4%, and 96.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of multicolored flow cytometric analysis in detecting epithelial malignancies in effusions specially in cases belonging to the atypia of undetermined significance and suspicious for malignancy categories and in cases with strong clinical suspicion of malignancy with negative fluid cytology. We recommend the combined use of FCM and cytology for this specific subgroup of patients in routine clinical practice for fast and accurate reporting.

Use of molecular testing results to analyze the overuse of atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid cytology.

INTRODUCTION: The suggested atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) rate for thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies is 10% or less. Prompted by a high institutional AUS rate, we examined using molecular testing results (MTR) as a potential quality metric tool to reduce the AUS rate. We correlated MTR with AUS cytologic findings, surgical pathology follow-up, and individual pathologist AUS rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demographic data, cytologic diagnoses, MTR, and surgical pathology diagnoses were retrospectively obtained. MTR were classified as either positive or negative. AUS rates and MTR proportions were compared among pathologists. The cytomorphologic features of 143 AUS cases were assessed and correlated with MTR. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2022, 710 of 3247 thyroid fine-needle aspirations were classified as AUS, with a yearly average rate of 22% (range = 19%-26%). AUS cases included: 331 (47%) with architectural atypia; 204 (29%) with oncocytic (Hürthle cell) atypia; 99 (14%) with combined architectural and cytologic atypia; and 76 (10%) with isolated cytologic atypia. Most AUS cases with molecular testing had negative MTR (360/492, 73%). AUS with cytologic atypia had higher positive MTR risk (logarithm of odds ratio = 1.27, 95% credible interval [0.5-2.04], P = 0.001). The average positive MTR rate by pathologist was 21.5% (range 0%-35%); higher positive MTR rates had better correlation with subsequent neoplastic/malignant histologic diagnoses. The MTR sensitivity for malignant disease was 89% and the negative predictive value was 91%. CONCLUSIONS: MTR analysis reveals the importance of cytologic atypia as a determinant of malignancy risk in AUS cases. Periodic analysis of MTR data alongside individual pathologist AUS rates can help refine diagnostic criteria and potentially reduce AUS overuse.

Weighty Matters: The Obesity-Thyroid Nodule Connection Unveiling the Impact of Obesity on Thyroid Cancer Risk.

Background and Objectives: The effect of obesity on the development/progression of thyroid nodules with uncertain cytology is unknown. Therefore, our objective was to assess the role of body mass index (BMI) in predicting malignancy in patients with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) nodules. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 113 patients with available BMI data and final histopathology of benign or differentiated thyroid cancer. Patients were classified into four groups based on BMI: <18.5 (underweight), 18.5-24.9 (normal weight), 25-29.9 (overweight), and ≥30 (obesity) kg/m2. The association between risk of malignancy and BMI was examined for all data and subgroups based on nodule size, sex, and age. Results: Overall, 44.2% were obese, 36.3% were ≥45 years, and 75.4% were women. Final pathological results showed malignant nodules in 52 patients (46%) and benign nodules in 61 patients (54%) (mean age: 41 ± 11.6 vs. 39.9 ± 11.7 years; p = 0.62). Men had more malignant nodules than benign nodules (32.7% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.05). Overall, no significant correlation was identified between the risk of thyroid cancer and BMI, and the risk of malignancy was not significantly different between obese men and women (p = 0.4). However, in individuals with BMI < 30 kg/m2 (non-obese group), malignant nodules were more frequent in men than in women (71% vs. 41%, p = 0.04). No significant difference was observed in mean nodule size between the benign and malignant groups. Furthermore, BMI was not related to increased risk of malignancy in multiple logistic regression models using all data, even after controlling for confounding variables (odds ratio, 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.93-1.06, p = 0.87) or when stratifying by sex. Conclusions: Our study showed no correlation between obesity and thyroid cancer in patients with AUS/FLUS. Moreover, men had more malignant nodules than benign nodules. Further well-designed prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.

Evaluating local thyroid cytopathology practices by molecular quality metrics: A multi-institutional study on 4651 FNAs with a focus on the role of the interventional cytopathologist.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) can be highly influenced by the technical skills of the operator performing the procedure and by interobserver variability in microscopic interpretation. This is particularly true for the indeterminate categories. Recently, molecular testing has been proposed as an ancillary tool for monitoring the performance of different thyroid cytopathology practices. The objective of this multicenter study was to evaluate the quality of different local cytopathology practices by assessing the impact of interventional cytopathologists on FNA adequacy for molecular testing and the variations in mutation rates across different health care centers operating in the Campania region. METHODS: The study included 4651 thyroid FNA samples diagnosed in different Southern Italian clinical laboratories belonging to the TIRNET (the Tiroide Network). FNA samples were collected by different proceduralists and were classified by local cytopathologists according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. FNAs classified as atypia of undetermined significance, follicular neoplasm, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant were centralized for a real-time polymerase chain reaction-based, seven-gene test at the authors' institution. RESULTS: Centers that employed interventional cytopathologists obtained fewer unsatisfactory FNA samples for molecular testing (11.3%) than centers that employed noncytopathologists (16.7%; p < .05). Furthermore, a significant variation in the mutation rate was observed in FNAs diagnosed by different local cytopathologists; indeterminate categories had the highest percentage of mutation rate variability among centers. CONCLUSIONS: Interventional cytopathologists obtained higher yields of diagnostic material for molecular testing. Finally, the current results suggest that the variability in mutation rates among different centers may highlight the low reproducibility of microscopic criteria among cytopathologists, particularly for indeterminate cases.

Current controversies in the management of patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules.

The management of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules remains debatable as their malignancy is difficult to establish. Most nodules have benign postoperative histology, but an accurate assessment of their proclivity for malignant transformation is crucial. Numerous studies have investigated the effects of various tools, including clinical, radiological, and cytological features, as well as biochemical and molecular markers, on the management of these heterogeneous nodules. Collectively, strategies aim to treat malignant nodules and avoid unnecessary surgery for asymptomatic benign nodules. Currently, no clear guidelines for the optimal management of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules exist to determine whether a conservative approach with long-term observation or surgical intervention should be selected. Thus, personalized approaches have been recommended. Large-scale multicenter prospective studies are needed to elucidate controversial issues. As this topic has not been comprehensively covered based on publications from the Gulf region, this review aims to shed light on remaining controversies.

Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier and histopathological outcome in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules: Initial versus repeat fine-needle aspiration.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data comparing the performance of Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) in thyroid nodules carrying an initial versus a repeat diagnosis of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS). This study reported an institutional experience in this regard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive thyroid nodules that had an initial or a repeat AUS diagnosis and had a subsequent GSC diagnostic result (benign or suspicious) from 2017 to 2021. All nodules were followed by surgical intervention or by clinical and/or ultrasound monitoring. GSC's benign call rate (BCR), rate of histology-proven malignancy associated with a suspicious GSC result, and diagnostic parameters of GSC were calculated and compared between the two cohorts (initial versus repeat AUS). Statistical significance was defined with a p-value of <.05 for all analysis. RESULTS: A total of 202 cases fulfilled inclusion criteria, including 67 and 135 thyroid nodules with an initial and a repeat AUS diagnosis, respectively. BCR was 67% and 66% in initial and repeat AUS cohorts, respectively. Rate of histology-proven malignancy associated with a suspicious GSC result were 22% and 24% in initial and repeat AUS cohorts, respectively. Compared with the repeat AUS cohort, the initial AUS cohort showed slightly lower sensitivity (83% vs. 100%), specificity (70% vs. 73%), PPV (23% vs. 24%), NPV (98% vs. 100%), and diagnostic accuracy (72% vs. 75%). Nevertheless, these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: GSC demonstrated comparable performance in thyroid nodules with a repeat AUS diagnosis versus nodules with an initial AUS diagnosis.

The influence of papillary features on the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to the assess the risk of malignancy in thyroid lesions that were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS when using a novel cytology subclassification system that is based on the presence or absence of papillary features. METHODS: AUS/FLUS case cytology was re-reviewed and subclassified into minor or major concern groups based upon the absence or presence of papillary features, respectively. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated and compared between the two groups. Inter-pathologist agreement in case subclassification was also measured. RESULTS: The minor concern group had a 12.6% associated ROM, while the major concern group had a significantly higher ROM (58.4%), (P < 0.001). Based on 108 cases, the inter-pathologist agreement in case subclassification was 79%, and the κ value was 0.47. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of papillary features significantly increases the ROM in thyroid lesions with an AUS/FLUS diagnosis.