Dermatological manifestations relating to nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery: case report and integrative literature review

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The number of bariatric surgeries performed worldwide is growing. Among the main short, medium or long-term complications after surgery are nutritional deficiencies. Many of these, such as those of Zn, Cu and vitamins A, B1, B3, B6 and B12, are manifested by dermatological lesions before potentially fatal systemic disorders occur. OBJECTIVE: To identify the main dermatological manifestations associated with nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery, and the associated variables. DESIGN AND SETTING: Integrative literature review carried out at a public university in Brazil. METHODS: This was a case report and a review of health research portals and databases of national and international biomedical journals, without publication date limitation. The descriptors used for searches followed the ideal methodology for each database/search portal: "bariatric surgery", "skin", "skin disease", "skin manifestation", "deficiency disease" and "malnutrition". RESULTS: A total of 59 articles were selected, among which 23 were review articles or articles that addressed specific dermatological manifestations. The other 36 articles described 41 cases, which were organized into a table with the clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: Although nutritional deficiencies are expected as complications after bariatric surgery, few articles relating them to their dermatological manifestations were found. It is important to recognize skin changes caused by nutritional deficiencies in patients treated via bariatric surgery, as these may occur before systemic complications appear and are easier to diagnose when the patient does not have any systemic symptoms yet. However, there is generally a delay between the appearance of skin lesions and making the diagnosis of nutritional deficiency.

Medicolegal Analysis of 81 Malpractice Claims Against Bariatric Surgeons in France.

BACKGROUND: Medicolegal expertise concerning bariatric surgery has greatly evolved, both quantitatively and qualitatively, but unfortunately, the jurisprudence is poor on the subject. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to propose a global and practical approach to medical liability in bariatric surgery. SETTING: University Hospital, France METHODS: This is a retrospective study which deals with an analysis of cases of surgical malpractice litigation between 2009 and 2011. Only the malpractice claims taken to the High Court and the Regional Commission of Reconciliation and Compensation have been taken into account in this study. RESULTS: During this period, there were 426 cases of visceral and digestive surgical malpractice litigation, 81 of which involved bariatric surgery (19%). Fistula was the most common complication leading to a malpractice claim (43.67%). The period of time between the allegations and the procedure was 2 years on average, with a range of 1 to 6 years. There were seven fistulas reported with gastric bypass GB (18.5%) and 31 with sleeve gastrectomy SG (81.5%) leading to malpractice claims. In the majority of cases, only the surgeon was implicated. Sometimes the anaesthetist or the surgical staff were implicated separately or "in solidum" with the surgeon. Every surgical technique was examined. CONCLUSION: Patients do not spontaneously differentiate between recovery from a complication and the result of an alleged error. Attention must be paid to the implications and discourteous remarks. Surgical complications are often unpredictable events and are not synonymous with medical mistakes.

Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Treatments for Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Mid-Term Results.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGP) has recently emerged as a new bariatric procedure. This surgery provides gastric restriction without resection, which could potentially provide a lower risk alternative, with fewer complications. The real benefit of this technique in the short and long term is unknown. This systematic review aims to compare laparoscopic gastric plication and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity treatment. METHODS: Clinical trials were identified in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, LILACS, BVS, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases. Comparison of LGP and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) included hospital stay, operative time, loss of hunger feeling, body mass index loss (BMIL), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), complications, symptoms in the postoperative period, and comorbidity remission or improvement. RESULTS: This systematic review search included 17,423 records. Eight studies were selected for meta-analysis. There is no difference in operative time, hospital stay, and complications. Patients in the SG group had improved loss of hunger feeling. BMIL was better in the SG group at 12 and 24 months [mean difference (MD) - 2.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 3.10 to - 1.28, and MD - 4.59, 95% CI - 5.55 to - 3.63, respectively]. SG showed improved %EWL compared with gastric plication in 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. However, no difference was found in %EWL long-term results (24 and 36 months). Patients who underwent LGP had more sialorrhea. SG showed better results in diabetes remission. CONCLUSIONS: SG showed improved weight loss when compared with LGP, with better satiety, fewer symptoms in the postoperative period, and improved diabetes remission.

Effect of BMI on quality of life and depression levels after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Studies conducted in Poland have found that 1% (~300,000) of Polish adults are obese. The degree of weight loss and reduction of discomfort associated with severe obesity are used to evaluate bariatric surgery outcomes. From the patient's point of view, QoL and mental health are the most important determinants of successful surgery, which is why interest in QoL assessment has increased. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of BMI on quality of life and depression levels depending on the type of bariatric surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The group included 57 women and 43 men aged 20-60 years (mean age 40 years) with BMI from 36 to 40 (31%) and > 40 (69%). Twelve patients (12%) underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric binding (LAGB), 58 (58%) sleeve gastrectomy, and 30 (30%) Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB). The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) was used to assess QoL. The severity of mood disorders was assessed using the Self-Rating Scale of Depression and Anxiety. RESULTS: Six months or 1 year after bariatric surgery, the number of patients with BMI > 40 had decreased from 69 to 14%. We found that the time since bariatric surgery contributed to a significant (p < 0.01) difference in BAROS outcomes. In the long-term perspective, we observed better quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: MA-QoL II is a useful tool in assessing bariatric surgery, including quality of life. Long-term monitoring will be essential in determining psychological changes and the degree of weight loss.