Clinical Implementation of DIGEST as an Evidence-Based Practice Tool for Videofluoroscopy in Oncology: A Six-Year Single Institution Implementation Evaluation.

Clinical implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) tools is a healthcare priority. The Dynamic Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) is an EBP tool developed in 2016 for videofluoroscopy in head and neck (H&N) oncology with clinical implementation as a goal. We sought to examine: (1) feasibility of clinical implementation of DIGEST in a national comprehensive cancer center, and (2) fidelity of DIGEST adoption in real-world practice. A retrospective implementation evaluation was conducted in accordance with the STARI framework. Electronic health record (EHR) databases were queried for all consecutive modified barium swallow (MBS) studies conducted at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2016 to 2021. Implementation outcomes included: feasibility as measured by DIGEST reporting in EHR (as a marker of clinical use) and fidelity as measured by accuracy of DIGEST reporting relative to the decision-tree logic (penetration-aspiration scale [PAS], residue, and Safety [S] and Efficiency [E] grades). Contextual factors examined included year, setting, cancer type, MBS indication, and provider. 13,055 MBS were conducted by 29 providers in 7,842 unique patients across the lifespan in diverse oncology populations (69% M; age 1-96 years; 58% H&N cancer; 10% inpatient, 90% outpatient). DIGEST was reported in 12,137/13,088 exams over the 6-year implementation period representing 93% (95% CI: 93-94%) adoption in all exams and 99% (95% CI: 98-99%) of exams excluding the total laryngectomy population (n = 730). DIGEST reporting varied modestly by year, cancer type, and setting/provider (> 91% in all subgroups, p < 0.001). Accuracy of DIGEST reporting was high for overall DIGEST (incorrect SE profile 1.6%, 200/12,137), DIGEST-safety (incorrect PAS 0.4% 51/12,137) and DIGEST-efficiency (incorrect residue 1.2%, 148/12,137). Clinical implementation of DIGEST was feasible with high fidelity in a busy oncology practice across a large number of providers. Adoption of the tool across the lifespan in diverse cancer diagnoses may motivate validation beyond H&N oncology.

Which Provider Specialties are Performing Diagnostic Procedures for Dysphagia in the United States?

OBJECTIVE: Care of patients with dysphagia occurs at the intersection of several different medical specialties. Otolaryngologists are uniquely equipped to diagnose dysphagia given their specialized training, yet the extent to which otolaryngologists perform diagnostic procedures for dysphagia is unknown. The objective of this study was to characterize the specialty-level variation among providers performing diagnostic assessments for dysphagia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of dysphagia care utilization among Medicare beneficiaries from 2013 to 2021 using the CMS Physician & Other Practitioners by Provider and Service dataset. American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) data reports were used to determine the total number of providers per specialty. For each procedure and specialty, the percentage of providers performing >10 procedures annually and the average annual number of procedures per performing provider (non-radiology) were calculated. RESULTS: We analyzed nine common dysphagia diagnostic procedures, including manometry, 24-h pH testing, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), and modified barium swallow study (MBSS). Mean 3.7 (SD 1.4) otolaryngologists (0.04% of practicing) performed manometry testing annually, compared to 493 (69.3) gastroenterologists (3.3%). Less than 1% of practicing otolaryngologists (37.8 (8.0) (0.04%)) and gastroenterologists (51.6 (8.4), 0.35%) performed 24-h pH testing annually. FEES testing was most commonly performed by otolaryngologists; however, only 48 (6.3) providers (0.51% of practicing) performed these procedures annually. For MBSS, fewer otolaryngologists (5.2 (1.0), 0.05%) perform these assessments than other medical specialties. Each otolaryngologist performed 110.7 (52.5) studies annually, compared to 200.1 (68.0) per gastroenterologist. CONCLUSION: Otolaryngologists represent a small fraction of providers performing dysphagia-related diagnostic procedures despite a unique training within our specialty to comprehensively diagnose and manage this condition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3698-3705, 2024.

The Evolving Clinical Trajectory From a Sliding Hiatus Hernia to Mixed Sliding and Para-Oesophageal Subtype: A Case Report.

We present a compelling case of a patient initially diagnosed with a simple sliding hiatus hernia (HH), which was managed conservatively through optimised medical therapy. Over the span of a few years, she developed new symptoms which included epigastric discomfort and pain, prompting further clinical review and imaging investigation. These revealed the progression of her HH from a simple form to a more complex rolling or para-oesophageal type. This outcome highlights the importance of recognising a potential for progression during the clinical assessment of patients with a history of reflux symptoms and the onset of new epigastric discomfort or pain. Understanding this continuum of HHs is essential for physicians as management plans may need to switch from a conservative to a more invasive approach.

Assessing Dysphagia in the Child.

Swallowing problems in children can occur for a variety of reasons, and assessment varies based on the age of the child, underlying medical problems, and results of the clinical swallow evaluation. The need for interdisciplinary management with speech language pathologists skilled in the management of children with dysphagia is imperative to identify the components of swallowing that are impaired and provide specific recommendations for safe and adequate nutrition supporting growth, development, and oral feeding if possible. This study focuses on the types of assessment tools available and how and when they are utilized for children of different ages and abilities.

Hiatal hernia reporting: time to remove subjectivity?

INTRODUCTION: The size of a hiatal hernia (HH) is a key determinant of the approach for surgical repair. However, endoscopists will often utilize subjective terms, such as "small," "medium," and "large," without any standardized objective correlations. The aim of this study was to identify HHs described using objective axial length measurements versus subjective size allocations and compare them to their corresponding manometry and barium swallow studies. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Retrospective chart reviews were conducted on 93 patients diagnosed endoscopically with HHs between 2017 and 2021 at Newton-Wellesley Hospital. Information was collected regarding their HH subjective size assessment, axial length measurement (cm), manometry results, and barium swallow readings. Linear regression models were used to analyze the correlation between the objective endoscopic axial length measurements and manometry measurements. Ordered logistic regression models were used to correlate the ordinal endoscopic and barium swallow subjective size allocations with the continuous axial length measurements and manometry measurements. RESULTS: Of the 93 endoscopy reports, 42 included a subjective size estimate, 38 had axial length measurement, and 12 gave both. Of the 34 barium swallow reads, only one gave an objective HH size measurement. Axial length measurements were significantly correlated with the manometry measurements (R2 = 0.0957, p = 0.049). The endoscopic subjective size estimates were also closely related to the manometry measurements (R2 = 0.0543, p = 0.0164). Conversely, the subjective size estimates from barium swallow reads were not significantly correlated with the endoscopic axial length measurements (R2 = 0.0143, p = 0.366), endoscopic subjective size estimates (R2 = 0.0481, p = 0.0986), or the manometry measurements (R2 = 0.0418, p = 0.0738). Mesh placement was significantly correlated to pre-operative endoscopic axial length measurement (p = 0.0001), endoscopic subjective size estimate (p = 0.0301), and barium swallow read (p = 0.0211). However, mesh placement was not significantly correlated with pre-operative manometry measurements (0.2227). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic subjective size allocations and objective axial length measurements are associated with pre-operative objective measurements and intra-operative decisions, suggesting both can be used to guide clinical decision making. However, including axial length measurements in endoscopy reports can improve outcomes reporting.

Clinician accuracy in identifying essential laryngeal landmarks on swallowing fluoroscopy.

Objective: Identification of anatomical landmarks is essential for interpretation of video fluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS). This investigation sought to confirm the location of essential laryngeal landmarks and determine clinician accuracy in structure identification on VFSS. Methods: A single human cadaver was used to generate unmarked standard lateral and anterior-posterior (AP) fluoroscopic images. Essential laryngeal structures (e.g., true vocal fold, arytenoid) were directly identified using a guidewire placed through an endoscope while obtaining corresponding marked fluoroscopic images. Licensed clinicians (speech-language pathologists [SLP], laryngologists) and trainees (otolaryngology residents, SLP clinical fellows [CF]) identified 18 structures (9 lateral, 9 AP) on unmarked images. Answers were compared to corresponding marked images. The percentage of accurate identification was calculated for each clinician and then compared between groups using t-tests. Results: Twenty-four individuals (10 SLPs, 1 CF, 9 residents, 4 laryngologists) from six institutions completed structure identification. Mean overall accuracy was 41.7 ± 13.0% (range 18.8-68.8%). There were no significant differences in mean overall accuracy between trainees (41.9 ± 12.9%) and clinicians (42.0 ± 13.1%), p = .97, or between SLPs (45.5 ± 12.8%) and physicians (38.9 ± 12.3%), p = .22. On average, participants were significantly more accurate identifying structures on lateral view (53.1 ± 16.1%) than AP (27.3 ± 22.8%), p < .001. Less than half of participants accurately identified the laryngeal ventricle, cricoid, epiglottic petiole, and the anterior commissure on lateral view. Conclusions: The ability of certified clinicians and trainees to correctly identify essential anatomic landmarks on swallowing fluoroscopy may be poor. Future work is needed to identify how we can train clinicians on more accurate identification of essential anatomic structures on swallowing fluoroscopy.Level of Evidence: NA.

Assessing the diagnostic yield of achalasia using provocative testing in high-resolution esophageal manometry: Serial diagnostic study.

BACKGROUND: Chicago Classification v4.0 recommends that if achalasia is demonstrated with single water swallows (SWS); provocative testing is not required. We determine whether provocative testing in patients with suspected achalasia can change manometric findings and reproduce symptoms. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2022, 127 consecutive manometry studies of patients with achalasia were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent SWS, a solid meal (SM) and/or a rapid drink challenge (RDC). Demographic data, fluoroscopy, gastroscopy, and pre-and post-treatment Eckardt scores were collated. KEY RESULTS: Of 127 achalasia patients (50.6 ± 16.6 years and 54.6% male), all completed a SM and 116 (91.3%) completed RDC; overall 83 were naïve (65.4%) to previous therapy. 15.4% patients with normal integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on SWS demonstrated obstruction with RDC. SM gave a different achalasia phenotype in 44.9% of patients (p ⟨ 0.001). Twelve patients with normal IRP during SWS had persistent/recurrent obstruction during provocative testing; 83.3% had previous achalasia therapy. None of 13 patients with Type III (TIII) achalasia with SWS exhibited a change in manometric findings with provocative testing. Impedance bolus heights were lower in patients with TIII achalasia and those with normal IRP with SWS. During the SM, symptoms were reproduced in 56.7% of patients. Forty-six of 103 patients (44.7%) underwent therapy based upon the final achalasia subtype which was defined by the provocative test result of the high-resolution manometry (HRM) study. All treatments were effective, regardless of the achalasia subtype. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Manometric findings remain unchanged when TIII achalasia is diagnosed with SWS. In patients with normal IRP, Type I, or Type II achalasia during SWS, provocative testing can alter achalasia phenotype or uncover achalasia where diagnosis is unclear. Further, it can reproduce symptoms. Such findings can personalize and guide effective therapeutic decisions.

Portal venous gas caused by barium swallow examination: An extremely rare clinical finding.

We found an extremely rare case of PVG after a barium swallow examination. This may be related to vulnerable intestinal mucosa in the patient undergoing prednisolone treatment. Conservative therapy should be considered for patients with PVG without bowel ischemia or perforation. Caution should be exercised during barium examination undergoing prednisolone treatment.

A case study of the development of a videofluoroscopy service: Integration and collaboration between the speech & language therapy and radiographer teams.

BACKGROUND: Videofluoroscopy (VFSS) is a dynamic fluoroscopic examination of swallowing function to assess oropharyngeal dysphagia. In the United Kingdom (UK), this test is typically performed by a team of Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs), radiologists and radiographers. While VFSS is undertaken across the UK, recent literature reflects wide variation in the procedure itself. OBJECTIVES: The role of the advanced practitioner gastrointestinal (GI) radiographer within a VFSS service will be illustrated by the narrative description of a VFSS service in a large NHS teaching hospital in England. The paper compares the existing VFSS service against recent literature outlining national practice, with particular focus upon the growing role of the advanced practitioner GI radiographer. Existing pressures upon the National Health Service (NHS) are examined as contributing factors. Lastly, further plans to improve the clinic are delineated. KEY FINDINGS: Recent literature shows a wide national variation in the running of VFSS services. Pertinently, the evidence suggests that radiologists are becoming progressively less involved in these clinics, with a move towards more practitioner-led services. The changes to the described VFSS service are in line with national trends, and the described clinic is an effective example of a practitioner-led service which fully utilises the role of the advanced practitioner GI radiographer. CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates that a practitioner-led service can benefit both patients and staff. Further improvement work is ongoing, with a particular need to involve service users and collect more meaningful outcome measures. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The growing move towards practitioner-led clinics is likely to continue. However, the wide variation in practice nationally and lack of consistent, recognised training that meets the needs of both SLT and radiographers, needs to be addressed.

Caustic esophageal stenosis: A case report of endoscopic dilatation with nasogastric tubes.

The management of the esophageal strictures that may result from caustic ingestion has evolved over time, from surgical to endoscopic management. Dilation with nasogastric tubes may be a valuable alternative in places with limited resources.

Videofluoroscopic Measures of Swallowing After Partial Epiglottidectomy for Dysphagia.

OBJECTIVE: Partial epiglottidectomy has a role in improving dysphagia due to epiglottic obstruction. This study evaluates objective parameters of swallow function in patients who underwent partial epiglottidectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study design. SETTING: Tertiary Care University Academic Medical Center. METHODS: A review was performed of patients who underwent CO2 laser partial epiglottidectomy for the treatment of dysphagia at a single tertiary care academic center over a 4-year period. Objective swallowing parameters were evaluated from pre- and postoperative modified barium swallow studies using SwallowTail Advanced Measurement software using blinded reviewers. The postswallow pharyngeal residue (bolus clearance ratio or BCR), spatiotemporal swallowing variables (oropharyngeal [OPT], hypopharyngeal [HPT], and total pharyngeal transit times [TPT]), and airway protection (Penetration-Aspiration Scale [PAS]) were analyzed. Student paired t test was used to determine significant changes in outcome parameters pre- and postsurgery. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (age range 45-92 years, median 70) met the inclusion criteria. A majority (69.8%) had a history of external beam radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. BCR decreased significantly from a mean of 31.7% presurgery to 24.2% (p = .01) postsurgery. OPT, HPT, and TPT did not differ significantly postsurgery. The mean Eating Assessment Tool-10 score improved from 25.1 to 20.2 after treatment (p = .03). PAS score improved by 15.4% and remained stable at 66.2% after surgery. CONCLUSION: Partial epiglottidectomy improves pharyngeal bolus clearance in properly selected patients with dysphagia due to epiglottic obstruction. Patients demonstrated stable swallow function with the benefit of reduced postswallow residue following surgical intervention.

The Influence of Side-Lying Position on Oropharyngeal Swallow Function in At-Risk Infants: An Exploratory Study.

This investigation assessed the effect of side-lying position on infant oropharyngeal swallow physiology. Infant modified barium swallow studies (MBS) recordings were retrospectively examined in matched-pairs comparing at-risk infants swallowing in both an upright/cradled position and a side-lying position. Swallow parameters were measured independently and through a consensus coding approach. Infants fed in side-lying position showed a decrease in airway invasion severity as compared with when those same infants were fed in an upright/cradled position (P = .009). Bolus location at the time of swallow initiation was higher when infants were fed in side-lying position as compared with cradle position (P = .024), representing decreased risk of airway invasion. Infants fed in side-lying position demonstrated fewer swallows per breaths (P = .032). This pilot study validates the need for additional research to further define the mechanisms related to this improvement, and to determine how diagnosis and medical stability moderate these findings.

Achalasia: investigation and management.

Achalasia, characterised by the absence of peristalsis and failure of relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter, is an uncommon degenerative condition that results in dysphagia. If left untreated it can lead to aspiration, oesophageal perforation, oesophagitis and malnutrition. It has a range of immune, allergic, viral and genetic aetiological causes. Successful diagnosis relies on the use of oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, barium swallow and oesophageal manometry to characterise the severity of the disease and to rule out underlying malignancy. Although no treatment can reverse the degenerative process, therapeutic strategies including lifestyle modification, medication, endoscopic and operative intervention can help to reduce symptoms. This article reviews the latest methods used to investigate and manage achalasia.

The American Broncho-Esophagological Association Position Statement on Swallowing Fluoroscopy.

OBJECTIVES: To develop an expert consensus statement on the clinical use of swallowing fluoroscopy in adults that reduces practice variation and identifies opportunities for quality improvement in the care of patients suffering from swallowing impairment. METHODOLOGY: A search strategist reviewed data sources (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus) to use as evidence for an expert development group to compose statements focusing on areas of controversy regarding swallowing fluoroscopy. Candidate statements underwent two iterations of a modified Delphi protocol to reach consensus. RESULTS: A total of 2184 publications were identified for title and abstract review with 211 publications meeting the criteria for full text review. Of these, 148 articles were included for review. An additional 116 publications were also included after reviewing the references of the full text publications from the initial search. These 264 references guided the authors to develop 41 candidate statements in various categories. Forty statements encompassing patient selection, fluoroscopic study choice, radiation safety, clinical team dynamics, training requirements, videofluoroscopic swallow study and esophagram techniques, and interpretation of swallowing fluoroscopy met criteria for consensus. One statement on esophagram technique reached near-consensus. CONCLUSIONS: These 40 statements pertaining to the comprehensive use of swallowing fluoroscopy in adults can guide the development of best practices, improve quality and safety of care, and influence policy in both the outpatient and inpatient settings. The lack of consensus on some aspects of esophagram technique likely reflects gaps in knowledge and clinical practice variation and should be a target for future research. Laryngoscope, 133:255-268, 2023.

Stakeholder Perspectives on Radiation Use and Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Adult Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

The Modified Barium Swallow Study (MBSS) is a videofluoroscopic examination of the anatomy and physiology involved in swallowing. Like other fluoroscopic examinations, the MBSS uses ionizing radiation with related radiation risks. Thus, the procedures and protocols related to MBSSs must balance the benefit of the diagnostic information gained with the risk of radiation exposure. This requires complex decision-making for any given clinician but becomes complicated due to the interprofessional nature of conducting MBSSs, namely the direct involvement of both the speech-language pathologist and radiologist with indirect involvement of the medical physicist and the referring physician. This editorial provides the perspectives of the various stakeholder groups related to radiation use in adult MBSSs, identifies barriers to conducting MBSSs in an evidence-based manner, and suggests areas for improvement.

Development and Implementation of Integrated Radiologist-Speech Pathologist Report for Modified Barium Swallow Study: Experience at a Multi-hospital Single Health Care System.

Dysphagia, or a disorder of swallowing, is very common and is reported in 1 out of 25 adults with approximately 1 million new cases per year in the United States alone. This also disproportionately impacts elderly patients, with a prevalence of 17%. Patients with dysphagia may have severe clinical complications such as starvation, dehydration, and airway obstruction- which may further increase mortality. Hence, timely and accurate diagnosis of dysphagia is hence crucial in management considerations. The gold standard for evaluating and diagnosing dysphagia is a modified barium swallow study (MBSS). The study is typically performed as a collaborative effort between a speech language pathologist (SLP) and a radiologist, who bring their individual skill sets to the table. Current MBSS reporting involves separately dictated and interpreted reports from the SLP and radiologist. In this paper, we elucidate our experience in a multi-institutional healthcare system wherein we have devised a single, integrated report for MBSS, which involves collaborative effort between SLP and the radiologist. We weight the advantages and disadvantages of unified reporting, the challenges of implementing it in a large healthcare system, and note how it can help improve efficiency and deliver unified patient care. We hope that this would be a template for other institutions as well as improve standardization of reporting techniques.

Preferred diagnostic methods of pyriform sinus fistula in different situations: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Pyriform sinus fistula (PSF) diagnosis is often easily delayed and incorrect. Diagnostic values of modalities vary in different situations. The aim of this study was to recommend optimal schemes for diagnosing PSF at different ages and infection stages. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CBM databases was conducted to identify articles written in Chinese and English concerning PSF diagnosis using keywords: "pyriform sinus fistula", "diagnosis", and relevant synonymous terms. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) levels of evidence and critical appraisal checklist tool. RESULTS: 111 studies describing 3692 patients were included. The highest true positive rate (TPR) of ultrasonography was 66.67 % in adult cases. Computed tomography (CT) yielded a good TPR (approximately 73 %) in both neonatal and adult patients, and contrast-enhanced CT (84.21 %) was better in adult patients. Most children cases could be accurately diagnosed by barium swallow (BS) examination which was significantly different in acute and non-infection stages (AIS, NIS). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) produced a nice TPR in fetal cases (69.23 %) and neonatal cases (54.44 %). Laryngoscopy was also affected by infection stages. TPR of gastroscopy (GS) was the highest in children (86.36 %) and adult cases (87.50 %). CONCLUSION: For fetal cases suspected of PSF, an MRI is recommended. MRI or CT is preferred for neonatal cases regardless of infection stages. Children and adult patients are advised to undergo GS during NIS or AIS, while BS is suggested for NIS. Contrast-enhanced CT can also diagnose adults with PSF in AIS.

Relating Physiologic Swallowing Impairment, Functional Swallowing Ability, and Swallow-Specific Quality of Life.

Many studies include functional swallowing ability and quality of life information to indicate a response to a specific swallowing intervention or to describe the natural history of dysphagia across diseases and conditions. Study results are difficult to interpret because the association between these factors and actual swallowing impairment is not understood. We set out to test the associations between components of physiologic swallowing impairment, functional swallowing ability, and swallow-specific quality of life using standardized and validated measurement tools: Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), and Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI). We specifically aimed to understand which factors may contribute to the overall relationships between these measurement tools when analyzed using total scores and item-level scores. This study included a heterogeneous cohort of 273 outpatients who underwent a modified barium swallow study (MBSS). We found significant correlations between MBSImP total scores and FOIS scores and DHI total scores, but not between MBSImP total scores and EAT-10 total scores. Significant correlations were also found between MBSImP item-level component scores and FOIS scores, EAT-10 total scores, and DHI total scores. Detailed item-level analyses revealed the MBSImP components of bolus transport/lingual motion, oral residue, and tongue base retraction were correlated with EAT-10 item-level scores and DHI item-level scores. The clinically modest associations between physiologic swallowing impairment, functional swallowing ability, and swallow-specific quality of life reveal different factors that uniquely contribute to patients' overall dysphagic profile, emphasizing the clinical impact of a comprehensive swallowing assessment.

Longitudinal Analysis of Swallowing Displacement Kinematics After Oropharyngeal Cancer Treatment.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Quantitative swallowing displacement kinematics evolve in patients treated for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). We aimed to longitudinally assess these measurements and correlate them with functional swallowing outcomes. METHOD: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with OPSCC treated with definitive (chemo)radiation ([C]RT) or surgery with adjuvant (chemo)radiation (S-[C]RT) who completed at least two videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS). Longitudinal analysis was accomplished via mixed-effects logistic regression for the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), and mixed-effects linear regression for kinematic measures. Spearman's correlation was conducted between changes in FOIS/PAS and kinematic measures. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients (76 males; mean age 61) completed 245 VFSS studies. A total of 94% had human papillomavirus (HPV)/p16 positive OPSCC and 74% were T0-T2. Sixty-four patients underwent [C]RT while 33 patients underwent S-[C]RT. After treatment, posterior pharyngeal wall at hold (PPWhold) increased 3.2 standard deviation (SD) between 0 and 6 months (p < 0.001), then decreased 2.2 SD between 6 and 12 months (p < 0.001) and did not return to baseline. Hyoid-to-larynx (HL) (p = 0.046) and maximal hyoid displacement (Hmax) + HL (p = 0.042) increased between 6 and 12 months. Hmax (p = 0.020) and Hmax + HL (p < 0.001) decreased between 12-24 months beyond baseline values. The decrease in HL and increase in PPWhold (p < 0.05) correlated with an increase in PAS. From baseline, increased pharyngeal constriction ratio correlated with decreased FOIS and PPWhold (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative swallowing kinematic measures can effectively track changes in swallowing physiology. Increased PPWhold and restricted hyolaryngeal movement were seen in patients with OPSCC after treatment and correlated with a change in swallowing outcome, emphasizing the need for serial VFSS monitoring and targeted intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:1339-1348, 2023.