Coming to Grips With Benign Prostate Enlargement or Prostate Cancer in Contemporary Japan: Readings From a Cancer-Self.

This article explores how a group of 35 Japanese men comprehend and verbalize the somatic experience embedded in dealing with benign prostate enlargement, or disquiet/discomfort of developing prostate cancer. Grounded in an adaptation of the sexual scripts theorizing, a set of in-depth, semistructured individual interviews were conducted through a LINE-app videocall from 2021 to 2023. Outcomes of interview were analyzed through a conversational approach, and presented by using three axes: the body, gender, and sexuality. An understanding of the Japanese-civilized-self has rendered somatic knowing problematic and pretended ignorance a strategy to deal with conversations about a condition involving the genitals and body waste. The body refers to a cancer-self who copes with ignorance of the prostate's anatomy and physiology, the-mechanics-of-urine, and medication/treatment side-effects. Gender is concerned with a cancer-self who grapples with an ailment that "emasculates the self," and the feminization of care as well as infantilization at medical facilities. Sexuality implies a cancer-self who bears scripts related to asexuality, medication/treatments that affect libido and penile erections, and a tarnished sexual reputation as a "heterosexual man" because prostate stimulation has been associate with homosexuality.

Early experience of "En bloc" holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in Saudi Arabia.

Purpose: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) showed higher efficacy than transurethral resection for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The present study aims to report the outcome of BPH treatment by HoLEP in a tertiary center. Patients and Methods: An observational prospectively collected data for consecutive symptomatic BPH patients undergoing HoLEP between January 2020 and December 2021. Demographic and perioperative data were collected with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life, peak flow rate (Qmax), residual urine postvoid residual (PVR), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) changes, in addition to perioperative and late adverse events. Results: One hundred patients were included with a median age of 73 years (range 65-80). The IPSS improved by 80% postoperatively (25 vs. 5, P < 0.001). Similarly, Qmax significantly improved. Seven patients were found to have incidental prostate cancer. No patient needed a perioperative blood transfusion. Compared to its preoperative values, follow-up PSA has been reduced by 75% (P < 0.001). Urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture were noted in < 2% of the patients. Conclusions: HoLEP is feasible for all prostate sizes and a safe and effective treatment for BPH patients; our results are consistent with the reported data in the literature regarding functional outcomes, complication rates, and urinary incontinence rates.

Are adverse events during surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia device related? A review of the MAUDE database.

PURPOSE: The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database contains anonymous, voluntary medical device reports. A review of device-related adverse events associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia surgeries was completed. The objective was to evaluate the occurrence and contributing factors to clinically significant complications in a cohort of patients electing to undergo surgical intervention for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. METHODS: The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was queried for "Aquablation, Greenlight Laser, Holmium Laser, Morcellator, Water Vapor Thermal Therapy, Loop Resection, and Prostatic Urethral Lift" from 2018 through 2021. A complication classification system (Level I-IV) based on the Clavien-Dindo system was used to categorize events. These events were then correlated with procedural technology malfunctions and classified as "device related" and "non-device related." Chi squared analysis was performed to identify associations between procedural technology and complication classification distribution. RESULTS: A total of 873 adverse events were identified. The adverse events were classified into level I (minimal harm) versus levels II-IV (clinically significant). Aquablation (p < 0.017) and Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (p < 0.012) were associated with a higher proportion of reports with Level II-IV complications compared with other procedure types. Level II-IV complications were not associated with a reported device related malfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Aquablation and water vapor thermal therapy demonstrated noteworthy clinically significant complications which were not driven by device-related malfunctions.

Prostatic urethral lift for subjects in urinary retention (PULSAR): 12-Month results of a prospective controlled trial compared with real-world outcomes.

Objective: To examine the safety and efficacy of prostatic urethral lift (PUL) in acute urinary retention (AUR) patients within a controlled (PULSAR) and real-world setting (Real-World Retrospective study). Materials and methods: PULSAR was a 12-month prospective study of PUL in AUR patients (n = 51) performed at six centres in the United Kingdom; enrolled BPH patients aged ≥50 years, with prostate volume of ≤100 cc. AUR was defined as being catheter dependent with at least one prior failed trial without catheter (TWOC) while on an alpha-blocker. RWR consisted of 3226 consecutive PUL patients across 22 international sites treated between July 2017 and March 2020; 469 of whom were in urinary retention (RWRr), that is, catheter-dependent at the time of their procedure. Symptom response, uroflow and catheter independence rates were compared between PULSAR and RWRr subjects. A logistical regression model was constructed to evaluate patient baseline and dynamic factors predicting success after the procedure. Results: Seventy-three percent of PULSAR subjects were catheter independent and free from surgical reintervention at 12 months post-PUL. Success was associated with higher voiding efficiency during the perioperative period. Slightly higher catheter-independent rates (80%) were seen in RWRr patients; variables that influenced success included age <70 years, lower baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA), lower baseline post-void residual (PVR) and shorter pre-procedural catheter duration. Logistic regression of the combined PULSAR and RWRr retention groups revealed that procedural age <70 years and higher bladder voiding efficiency (BVE) were associated with success. Conclusions: Lower baseline PSA and PVR, younger age and shorter pre-procedure catheter durations drove successful outcomes in AUR patients undergoing PUL. Post-PUL voiding efficiencies may help ascertain long-term response to treatment.

Immediate effect of alpha-blockers in predicting LUTS improvement in BPH patients.

INTRODUCTION: Indications for treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia include reversing signs and symptoms or preventing the progression of the disease. Alpha-blockers are the most effective, least costly, and best tolerated of the drugs for relieving LUTS. The aim of the study is to investigate the immediate impact of alpha-blocker medications on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: About 100 patients were included in the study-50 patients in each of the groups A (tamsulosin) and B (silodosin). The first visit was the baseline examination before starting alpha-blockers and included history, DRE, UFM, USG KUBP with PVR, IPSS, serum PSA, serum creatinine, urine analysis, urine culture, and sensitivity. All above parameters were also at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months following starting of alpha-blockers respectively, and compared with baseline. RESULT: As of the first, second, third, and fourth visits, the mean Qmax in group A was 10.3 ± 3.3 s, 15.08 ± 2.80 s, 15.66 ± 3.18 s, and 15.12 ± 3.24 s, respectively, while in group B it was 10.1 ± 3.1 s, 14.88 ± 2.80 s, 15.18 ± 3.18 s, and 15.08 ± 3.24 s, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean voiding time was 40.87 ± 23.91 s, 36.41 ± 20.73 s, 34.85 ± 21.37 s, and 32.07 ± 21.81 s, respectively in group A, and 41.27 ± 15.49 s, 37.23 ± 21.34 s, 38.59 ± 20.83 s, and 33.10 ±22.08. In group A, the mean PVR and IPSS scores were improved and also improved in group B. CONCLUSION: The first dose of tamsulosin and silodosin improves UFM and predicts the mid-term change in UFM as well as IPSS indices in the treatment of BPH-related LUTS.

Comparison of surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia of medium-volume prostates: evaluation of the causes of rehospitalization from the French National Hospital Database (PMSI-MCO).

PURPOSE: In France, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is still the most commonly used surgical treatment for medium sized benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but the Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and laser vaporization procedures are becoming more common. For these three surgical procedures, we evaluate the initial complications, the short term (3 months) and the 4-12-month postoperative complications necessitating re-hospitalization. METHODS: From the French national hospital data base (PMSI-MCO), all hospitalizations for BPH treatment in 2018 were extracted. We document the complications during the initial hospitalization and any subsequent rehospitalizations during the one-year postoperative period. RESULTS: In 2018, 67,220 patients were treated for BPH: 46,242 TURP, 13,509 HoLEP and 7469 laser vaporization. Age and anticoagulation medications were similar for men treated by the three procedures, but TURP patients were more often hypertensive. Infections and hemorrhagic complications were the most common complications at the initial hospitalization: 17%, 10%, 13% for infections and 15%, 8.1%, 11% for hemorrhagic complications respectively, and TURP performed worse than the other two procedures at the initial hospitalization. During the first three months and then the subsequent nine months, there were fewer complications than initially, with little difference between the three procedures, all differences being less than 1%. CONCLUSION: Laser vaporization techniques led to fewer complications. However, the PMSI-MCO only registers complications during hospitalizations. This study should be extended to non-hospitalized, more minor complications.

Benefits and Harms of Benign Prostatic Obstruction Treatments in Renal Transplanted Patients.

CONTEXT: In an increasingly ageing transplant population, timely management of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is key to preventing complications that result in graft dysfunction or compromise survival. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate benefits/harms of BPO treatments in transplant patients by reviewing current literature. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A computerised bibliographic search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed for studies reporting outcomes on BPO treatments in transplanted patients. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 5021 renal transplants (RTs) performed between 1990 and 2016 were evaluated. BPO incidence was 1.61 per 1000 population per year. Overall, 264 men underwent intervention. The mean age was 58.4 yr (27-73 yr). In all, 169 patients underwent surgery (n = 114 transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP]/n = 55 transurethral incision of the prostate [TUIP]) and 95 were treated with an un-named alpha-blocker (n = 46) or doxazosin (n = 49). There was no correlation between prostate volume and treatment modality (mean prostate size = 26 cc in the surgical group where reported and 48 cc in the medical group). The mean follow-up was 31.2 mo (2-192 mo). The time from RT to BPO treatment was reported in six studies (mean: 15.4 mo, range: 0-156 mo). The time on dialysis before RT was recorded in only three studies (mean: 47.3 mo, range: 0-288 mo). There was a mean improvement in creatinine after intervention from 2.17 to 1.77 mg/dl. A total of 157 men showed an improvement in the International Prostate Symptom Score (from 18.26 to 6.89), and there was a significant reduction in postvoid residual volume in 199 (mean fall 90.6 ml). Flow improved by a mean of 10 ml/s following intervention in 199 patients. Complications included acute urinary retention (4.1%), urinary tract infections (8.4%), bladder neck contracture (2.2%), and urethral strictures (6.9%). The mean reoperation rate was 1.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Current literature is heterogeneous and of low-level evidence. Despite this, alpha-blockers, TUIP, and TURP showed a beneficial increase in the peak urinary flow and reduced symptoms in transplants patients with BPO. Improvement in the mean graft creatinine was noted after intervention. Complications were under-reported. A multicentre comparative cohort study is needed to draw firm conclusions about the ideal treatment for BPO in RT patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the outcomes for transplant patients undergoing medical or surgical management of benign prostatic obstruction. Although the literature was very heterogeneous, we found that medical management and surgery with transurethral resection/incision of the prostate are beneficial for improving urinary flow and bothersome symptoms. We conclude that further prospective studies are required for better clarity about timing and modality of intervention in transplant patients.

Hepatotoxicidad por tamsulosina / dutasterida: reporte de un caso probable

La tamsulosina y dutasterida son medicamentos ampliamente usados como tratamiento de la hipertrofia benigna de próstata. teniendo un buen perfil de seguridad. Existen escasos reportes de injuria hepática asociado al uso de tamsulosina; sin embargo, no hay reportes de toxicidad hepática por el uso de dutasterida y del uso combinado de tamsulosina/dutasterida. Se presenta el caso de un varón de 64 años quien desarrolla injuria hepática tras el uso combinado de tamsulosina/dutasterida, desarrollando un patrón de daño hepatocelular y clínica de hepatitis aguda. Se realizo descarte de patología hepática viral, autoinmune y enfermedades metabólicas de depósito, así como de patología biliar mediante ecografía abdominal y colangioresonancia. En la evaluación de causalidad, presentó CIOMS-RUCAM: 6 puntos (probable) y Naranjo: 4 puntos (posible). El paciente presentó respuesta clínica y laboratorial luego de suspender el medicamento.

Tamsulosin and dutasteride are drugs widely used to treat benign prostatic hypertrophy. having a good safety profile. There are few reports of liver injury associated with the use of tamsulosin; however, there are no reports of hepatic toxicity from the use of dutasteride and the combined use of tamsulosin/dutasteride. We present the case of a 64-year-old man who developed liver injury after the combined use of tamsulosin/dutasteride, developing a pattern of hepatocellular damage and acute hepatitis symptoms. Viral, autoimmune, and metabolic storage diseases of the liver were ruled out, as well as biliary pathology by means of abdominal ultrasound and resonance cholangiography. In the causality evaluation, CIOMS-RUCAM presented: 6 points (probable) and Naranjo: 4 points (possible). The patient presented a clinical and laboratory response after discontinuing the drug.

Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of Bladder Neck Incision at Time of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.

Introduction: The effect of prophylactic bladder neck incision (BNI) at time of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is unknown. The aim of our study was to examine HoLEP outcomes with a specific focus on rates of bladder neck contractures (BNCs), with and without utilizing prophylactic BNI. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of HoLEP patients from January 2021 until January 2022. Outcomes of patients who underwent BNI at time of HoLEP were compared with those who underwent standard HoLEP alone. Student's t-tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regressions were performed using SAS Studio. Results: In total, 421 patients underwent HoLEP. BNI was concurrently performed in 74 (17.6%) HoLEP patients. BNI patients were younger (67.5 ± 9.0 years vs 71.1 ± 8.2 years, p = 0.00007) and had smaller prostates (60.7 ± 30.3 cc vs 133.2 ± 64.5 cc, p < 0.0001). Procedure, enucleation, and morcellation times were shorter in the BNI group (all p < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference in same-day discharge rates (90.4% vs 87.7%, p = 0.5), short-term functional outcomes, emergency department (ED) visits, or readmission rates between the two groups. At 14 months mean follow-up, two BNCs occurred in patients in the control group (0.6%), and no BNCs occurred in patients who underwent BNI (0.0%, p = 0.5). Conclusions: BNI at time of HoLEP did not decrease the ability to achieve same-day discharge or increase 90-day complications, ED visits, or readmission rates. No BNCs occurred in patients who underwent prophylactic BNI (0.0%) despite a smaller gland size and lower specimen weight in this cohort. Further prospective studies are required to conclude if concurrent BNI at time of HoLEP is protective against BNC.

A guide to diagnosing and treating benign prostatic hypertrophy.

Benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) is a condition where the prostate becomes enlarged. It affects all men and is part of the ageing process. Globally, the incidence rates of BPH have risen by 70% between 2000-2019. When left untreated, it can lead to acute urinary retention, impaired bladder emptying, urinary tract infections, bladder stones, kidney failure or gross haematuria. In this article, Linda Nazarko describes the causes and consequences of BPH along with treatment options that are available for it.

IL-8 Produced Via Bidirectional Communication Between Prostate Cancer and M2 Macrophages as a Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker.

PURPOSE: Owing to the mortality associated with metastatic prostate cancer and the shortcomings of the current parameters in predicting the disease prognosis, we require the identification of viable biomarkers, which would help in the diagnosis and prognosis of the disease. We aimed to determine whether the interleukin-8 level in the tumor microenvironment could serve as a potential clinical diagnostic marker and prognostic factor for prostate cancer. METHODS: The migration assay of prostate cancer cells was performed in an in vitro co-culture model. Cell lines PC3 and DU145 were divided into two groups and co-cultured with M0 and M2 macrophages, respectively. We used reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction to detect M2 macrophage marker expression levels. Immunohistochemistry analyses of tissue microarrays were performed to analyze the correlation between the increased expression of interleukin-8 and the prognosis of prostate cancer. A retrospective analysis based on 142 residual serum specimens was performed to analyze the level of interleukin-8. RESULTS: We observed that M2 macrophages promoted the migration of prostate cancer cells and significantly increased the concentrations of interleukin-8 in the co-culture supernatants. We observed increased expression of CD163 and interleukin-8 in prostate cancer tissues. Furthermore, the levels of interleukin-8 in the serum of prostate cancer patients were higher than those in healthy controls. Untreated patients had higher levels of interleukin-8, which could be a predictor of a higher metastasis rate. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that interleukin-8 produced via bidirectional communication between prostate cancer cells and M2 macrophages is a putative biomarker for prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment.

[Efficacy of Urapidil in treating lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential application of α-1 blocker (urapidil) in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in male patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis. METHODS: Our study involved identifying and collecting randomized controlled trials (RCT) and clinical observational studies from databases including PubMed、MEDLINE、Web of science、CNKI and Wanfang database. We performed meta-analysis using RevMan 5.2.0 software for both fixed effects model and random effects model. RESULTS: Our analysis included 3 short-term (within 1 month) observational studies and 1 RCT involving 142 patients. We found that urapidil significantly improved the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS, MD=－5.57, 95%CI: －7.98～－3.16，P<0.00001), nocturia（MD=－0.7, 95%CI: －1.16～－0.24，P=0.003）, residual urine rate（MD=－6.97；95%CI: －12.57～－1.37，P=0.01）, average flow rate（MD=2.04；95%CI: 0.52～3.56，P=0.008）, and maximum flow rate （MD=4.29；95%CI: 0.58～8.01，P=0.02）of patients. However, there was no significant difference in the residual urine volume（MD=－35.93；95%CI: －78.62～6.76，P=0.10）between pre-treatment and post-treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Urapidil is an effective medication for relieving LUTS in BPH patients. However, due to the limited quantity and quality of current RCT studies, high-quality and large-scale RCT studies are still needed to further confirm this conclusion.

Controversies in Prostate Artery Embolization: Future Best Practice.

Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia is correlated with age. Men seeking treatment options with a low side effect profile often turn to prostate artery embolization (PAE). PAE continues to be refined with advanced tools and optimized techniques. Nonetheless, there exist controversies in terms of best practices for the management of lower urinary track symptoms (LUTS) with PAE. These controversies are essential for medical progress. Herein we suggest best practices moving forward based on currently available data. Given extensive safety data, we recommend PAE be considered alongside medical management and as a precursor to surgery. Given demonstrated efficacy across gland sizes, PAE can be performed in a single session, ideally in a hybrid angio-CT suite, without preoperative cross-sectional imaging. PAE should be initially performed with 300- to 500-µm size particles, and instead consider exploring other particles and sizes for repeat PAE. Finally, PAE can also be considered as first-line option for recurrent disease given the efficacy and excellent safety profile. This article is not meant to purport a dogma, but rather to serve as a guide to the experienced practitioner in challenging his or her own biases when performing PAE.

The State of Evidence in Prostate Artery Embolization.

Prostate artery embolization (PAE) has emerged over the past two decades as a minimally invasive, nonsurgical treatment for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). While the majority of evidence for PAE stems from retrospective cohort studies, several seminal randomized controlled trials have been performed comparing short-term outcomes of PAE to transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and against a sham procedure. Across clinical trials, PAE demonstrates consistent improvement in urological symptoms and quality of life in patients with BPH with low complication rates. When compared to TURP, the results are comparable, but there is a trend for better outcomes in certain clinical parameters with TURP. PAE is a suitable option for patients who are not surgical candidates, prefer nonsurgical treatment with an earlier return to routine activities, and wish to better preserve sexual function.

Prostatic Artery Embolization: Technical Pearls.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a condition that primarily affects men between the fourth and seventh decades of life, occurring due to enlargement of the prostate which subsequently causes compression of the prostatic urethra causing chronic obstruction of the urinary outflow tract. BPH can cause significant quality-of-life issues such as urinary hesitancy, intermittency, decreased urinary stream, a sensation of incomplete emptying, dysuria, urinary retention, hematuria, and nocturia. Several medical and surgical treatment modalities are available for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms and other BPH-related sequela; however, increasingly prostate artery embolization is being utilized in this patient population. Technical demands for this procedure in this population can be significant. This article describes the optimal techniques, tricks, and advanced imaging techniques that can be used to achieve desired technical outcomes.

Updates on Preprocedural Evaluation and Patient Selection for Prostatic Artery Embolization.

Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is a safe and effective treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patient evaluation is a critical and important part of this growing practice. History taking should include symptoms score evaluations for lower urinary tract symptoms, erectile function, and prostatitis symptoms score. The objective evaluations commonly include measurement of prostate specific antigen, postvoid residual volume, and uroflowmetry as well as urodynamic studies in selective patients. Imaging evaluation may include computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography, elucidating prostate volume, prostate gland morphology, vasculature, and prostate cancer. With evolving knowledge on PAE, we aim to discuss patient evaluation and selection based on updated evidence and discuss specific scenarios.

The Prostate as an Endocrine Organ: Its Modulation of Serum Testosterone.

Aside from nonmelanoma skin cancer, prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the United States, and benign prostatic hyperplasia is the most common benign tumor found in men. Until recently, its endocrine functions and possible influence on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis have been relatively understudied. This review summarizes the current understanding of the potential endocrine functions of prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue.

Correlation between prostate volume measured by ultrasound and symptoms severity score in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy in Southeastern Nigeria.

Background: Benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) is a common urological condition in men older than 50 years. It is important in the aetiologies of life-threatening obstructive uropathies. Ultrasound measurement of prostate volume is non-invasive, easily available, and a cost-effective method, useful in assessing bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). The International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) on the other hand objectively assesses symptoms severity in BOO patients. Aim: This study was aimed at determining the correlation between ultrasound-measured prostate volume and IPSS in men with BPH. Patients and Methods: Following ethical approval from the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital Ethical Committee, 100 patients who met the inclusion criteria and were diagnosed with clinical BPH were enrolled into the study. They had no other identifiable cause of BOO except BPH after clinical evaluation. The IPSS, Quality of life score (QOL), and prostate volumes were measured. Correlation between prostate volume, IPSS, and QOL were done using SPSS version 20. P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean age of patients was 69.3 ± 10.6 years with a range of 48-100 years. The mean prostate volume, IPSS, and QOL were 96.0 ± 70.5 cm3, 15.63 ± 8.6, and 4.8 ± 1.3, respectively. The highest recorded IPSS was 35 and the lowest was 4, whereas the smallest and largest recorded prostate volumes were 19 cm3 and 350 cm3, respectively. Nocturia was the major IPSS subscore. There was a weak positive correlation between prostate volume and IPSS in men with BPH (r = +0.109; P = 0.28) and between prostate volume and QOL (r = +0.072; P = 0.45). There was also a weak positive correlation between patients with only severe symptoms and corresponding prostate volumes (r = +0.122; P = 0.125). The correlation between patients with severe symptoms and their corresponding QOL was strong (r = +0.537; P = 0.135, respectively). These findings were, however, not statistically significant. Conclusion: There is a weak positive correlation between prostate volume measured by ultrasound and symptoms severity scores in patients with BPH, although not statistically significant. This may be as a result of the small sample size. A larger sample size may be able to achieve statistical significance.