Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 89: 106643, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34864268

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Heterotopic ossification (HO) associated with Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (anti-NMDA) receptor encephalitis is rare and the treatment strategy is unclear. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 31-year-old female diagnosed with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis from Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, JAPAN that developed heterotopic ossification of the knees during prolonged coma. She was unable to walk because of pain and limited range of motion in both knees. Thirty months after the onset of the coma, surgical excision of the heterotopic bone in both knees was performed. The range of motion of both the knees improved markedly and she had no recurrence of heterotopic ossification on a three-year follow-up. Thus, this case can be used as a guide for surgeons with such patients. CONCLUSIONS: We reported a case of heterotopic bone formation in the periarticular region of both bilateral knees in a patient who suffered a 2-month coma following anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Surgical excision of the heterotopic bones significantly improved the passive range of motion in both knees. Three years after the operation, the patient had no complaints about her knees, and there was no recurrence of HO.

2.
ANZ J Surg ; 89(5): 567-572, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30968551

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical management options for bilateral knee osteoarthritis comprise staged or single-anaesthetic bilateral total knee replacements (SABTKRs). We examined the New Zealand Joint Registry hypothesizing there would be no difference between these practices compared to unilateral total knee replacement (TKR) examining 30-day mortality, all-cause revision rate and function. METHODS: For this study, 84 946 primary TKRs were identified. We compared three groups: unilateral TKRs, all SABTKRs and all staged bilateral TKRs with intervals of 1 to 90 days, 91 days to 1 year and >1 year. Cumulative revision rates were calculated (Kaplan-Meier method). Mortality risks were compared to unilateral TKR and hazard ratios (HRs) calculated. Six-month Oxford scores were compared using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality for SABTKR was 0.219%: unilateral TKR 0.236% (HR 0.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.48; P < 001). Staged TKR had lower mortality than unilateral TKR at three time interval groups unless performed within 90 days (adjusting for age and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade) TKR (<90 days HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.703-1.371; P = 0.915; 91-365 days HR 0.783; 95% CI 0.687-0.891; P < 0.001; >365 days HR 0.394; 95% CI 0.344-0.451; P < 0.001). Revision risk with SABTKR was lower at 0.43/100 component years (95% CI 0.37-0.49/100 component years) compared to unilateral 0.56/100 component years (95% CI 0.53-0.59; P < 0.05). Six-month Oxford scores were superior in SABTKR versus unilateral TKR (38.6 (95% CI 38.2-39) versus 36.9 (95% CI 36.8-37.1); P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SABTKR is at least as safe as unilateral TKR or staged bilateral TKR in appropriately selected cases. Surgeons should wait at least 90 days before the second procedure.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics/therapeutic use , Forecasting , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Registries , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Knee Prosthesis , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prosthesis Failure , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends
3.
J Arthroplasty ; 33(10): 3167-3173, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29908796

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective procedure for relieving pain and restoring function in osteoarthritis, with a significant proportion of patients having severe disease bilaterally. However, although there are differences in patient selection criteria for bilateral procedures, there is no consensus regarding the optimal timing for bilateral TKA. The aim of this study was to compare rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality between simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. METHODS: Data for over 36,000 bilateral TKAs were collected from September 1999 to December 2015. Rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality rates were obtained for simultaneous bilateral and staged procedures with intervals of 1 day-6 weeks, 6 weeks-3 months, and 3-6 months. Yearly cumulative percent revision or cumulative percent survival with 95% confidence intervals calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted hazard ratios were used for comparisons. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between revision rates or reasons for revision between staged bilateral and simultaneous TKA (hazard ratio 1.09 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.85-1.40; P = .511] for 1 day-6 weeks, 0.93 [95% CI 0.77-1.14; P = .494] for 6 weeks-3 months, and 1.10 [95% CI 0.98-1.23; P = .115] for 3-6 months). The most common reasons for revision were loosening/lysis and infection. The 30-day mortality rates were lower in the 6 weeks-3 months group than simultaneous bilaterals (P = .007). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA have similar rates of revision over the medium term but that 30-day mortality is reduced in the 6 weeks-3 months group.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/mortality , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/statistics & numerical data , Australia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Knee Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/epidemiology , Prosthesis Failure , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Reoperation/mortality , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
4.
Article in Korean | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-157303

ABSTRACT

Septic artiritis is a disease that causes a rapid joint destruction by various kinds of bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus. It affects more frequently the patients with rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, immunocompromised patients, and chronic steroid users. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 1 to 12% of patients are affected by septic arthritis. In these patients, it is very difficult to distinguish between an acute exacerbation of rheumatoid arthritis and a development of septic arthritis if the latter affects more than one joint. Septic arthritis usually affects single joint, especially the knee joint. If the diagnosis and treatment are delayed, it would cause sepsis resulting in high mortality and morbidity. Thus early diagnosis by arthrocentesis, prompt drainage, and antibiotics therapy are essential. We experienced a 46 years-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis who abused the steroids for 10 years and complaining recent aggravation of bilateral knee joint swelling, warmth, and tenderness. Large amount of pus from both knees showed Gram positive cocci. The immediate open surgical drainage of both knees was done. The patient recovered from septic arthritis after 6 weeks of antibiotics therapy. The synovial fluid microbiology study should be done in all joints of the patients with the risk factors of joint infection.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Arthritis, Infectious , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Bacteria , Diagnosis , Drainage , Early Diagnosis , Gram-Positive Cocci , Immunocompromised Host , Joints , Knee Joint , Knee , Mortality , Risk Factors , Sepsis , Staphylococcus aureus , Steroids , Suppuration , Synovial Fluid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...