ABSTRACT
Los dispositivos de asistencia ventricular izquierda se han convertido en los últimos años en un elemento importante para el manejo del fallo ventricular izquierdo refractario a tratamiento farmacológico. Su implantación (realizada mediante toracotomía izquierda o esternotomía) genera un importante dolor perioperatorio, que puede ser manejado con técnicas de anestesia locorregional. Sin embargo, existe gran controversia sobre su realización en cirugía cardíaca debido a la interferencia con la terapia anticoagulante necesaria en estos pacientes.El bloqueo del plano erector espinal constituye una alternativa a las técnicas locorregionales clásicas, al no producir alteraciones hemodinámicas y no interferir con la terapia antiagregante y anticoagulante, siendo una alternativa a tener en cuenta en cirugía cardíaca. Presentamos un caso de implantación de asistencia ventricular izquierda con realización de dicho bloqueo previo al procedimiento quirúrgico e infusión postoperatoria a través de catéter, obteniéndose resultados satisfactorios en el manejo del dolor perioperatorio.(AU)
In recent years, left ventricular assist devices have become an important element in the management of left ventricular failure refractory to pharmacological treatment. Their implantation (performed by left thoracotomy or sternotomy) generates significant perioperative pain, which can be managed with locoregional anesthesia techniques. However, opinions vary on their use in cardiac surgery due to interference with the anticoagulant therapy required in these patients.The erector spinae plane block is an alternative to classic locoregional techniques. It does not produce hemodynamic alterations and does not interfere with antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy, and is therefore an alternative to be considered in cardiac surgery. We present a case of left ventricular assist device implantation under this block prior to the surgical procedure and postoperative infusion through a catheter, obtaining satisfactory results in the management of perioperative pain.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Analgesia , Perioperative Period , Ventricular Function, Left , Drug Therapy , Anesthesia, Conduction , Thoracic Surgery , Anesthesiology , Pain ManagementABSTRACT
In recent years, left ventricular assist devices have become an important element in the management of left ventricular failure refractory to pharmacological treatment. Their implantation (performed by left thoracotomy or sternotomy) generates significant perioperative pain, which can be managed with locoregional anaesthesia techniques. However, opinions vary on their use in cardiac surgery due to interference with the anticoagulant therapy required in these patients. The erector spinae plane block is an alternative to classic locoregional techniques. It does not produce hemodynamic alterations and does not interfere with antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy, and is therefore an alternative to be considered in cardiac surgery. We present a case of left ventricular assist device implantation under this block prior to the surgical procedure and postoperative infusion through a catheter, obtaining satisfactory results in the management of perioperative pain.
Subject(s)
Nerve Block , Humans , Nerve Block/methods , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Paraspinal Muscles , Thoracotomy , CathetersABSTRACT
Abstract We present a 9-year-old patient with end-stage renal disease, on peritoneal dialysis, who underwent a staged prone retroperitoneoscopic bilateral nephrectomy. Bilateral nephrectomy was indicated in preparation for renal transplant in the context of genetic predisposition malignancy when immunosuppressed. The two mirror-image surgeries enable the comparison of the anesthetic management and outcomes in a single patient. Features of interest to anesthesiologists include approach to a child with chronic kidney disease, different requirements for intraoperative antihypertensives; pain management strategies, including a comparison of erector spinae plane block with and without adjunct dexmedetomidine; anesthetic management of retroperitoneoscopic pediatric surgery and the first description of using a Foley bag attached to a peritoneal dialysis catheter to aid in diagnosis and repair of posterior peritoneal cavity entry.
Resumen Se presenta un paciente de 9 años de edad con enfermedad renal terminal, en diálisis peritoneal, quien se sometió a nefrectomía bilateral retroperitoneoscópica estadificada en posición prona. Se indicó la nefrectomía bilateral en preparación para trasplante renal en el contexto de predisposición genética hacia desarrollar una patología maligna al estar inmunosuprimido. Las dos cirugías en espejo permiten hacer una comparación del manejo anestésico y de los desenlaces en un mismo paciente. Las características de interés para los anestesiólogos incluyen el abordaje de un niño con enfermedad renal crónica, con requisitos diferentes de antihipertensivos intraoperatorios; estrategias para el manejo del dolor, incluyendo una comparación de bloqueo del plano del erector espinal con y sin dexmedetomidina adyuvante; manejo anestésico de cirugía pediátrica retroperitoneoscópica y la primera descripción del uso de una bolsa Foley conectada a un catéter de diálisis peritoneal para ayudar en el diagnóstico y la reparación de la entrada de la cavidad peritoneal posterior.
Subject(s)
Pancreas DivisumABSTRACT
El bloqueo del plano del erector espinal es una técnica de anestesia regional con resultados favorables en el manejo del dolor postoperatorio en pacientes pediátricos. Los reportes son escasos en Latinoamérica. Presentamos el caso de un paciente de 5 años con diagnóstico de pectus excavatum sometido a técnica quirúrgica convencional (técnica de Ravitch). Se realiza el bloqueo del plano del erector espinal bilateral con guía ecográfica a nivel de la apófisis transversa de T5 obteniéndose una adecuada estabilidad hemodinámica intraoperatoria y analgesia postoperatoria.(AU)
The spinal erector plane block is a regional anesthesia technique with favorable results in the management of postoperative pain in pediatric patients. Reports are few in Latin America. We present the case of a 5-year-old patient with a diagnosis of Pectus Excavatum undergoing a conventional surgical technique (Ravitch technique). Bilateral erector spinae plane block is performed with ultrasound guidance at the level of the transverse process of T5, obtaining adequate intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative analgesia.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Funnel Chest/surgery , Anesthesia, Conduction , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Nerve Block , Inpatients , Physical Examination , Pediatrics , Pain/drug therapy , AnalgesiaABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Thoracic erector spinae plane block is now performed in many different surgical procedures, including lumbar spinal fusion. We evaluated the analgesic effect of lumbar ESP performed at L4 after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. METHODS AND CASE SERIES: Eight patients scheduled for lumbar spinal fusion were included in the case series. Erector spinae plane block was performed at L4 preoperatively, administering 20ml of 0.2% ropivacaine on each side. We recorded patient-reported pain intensity during the first 48 postoperative hours using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and rescue analgesia requirements. Pain at rest was controlled in all patients (VAS 0 to 3), although pain on movement ranged from mild to severe (VAS 0 to 8). Rescue analgesia consumption ranged from 1 to 22mg morphine. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar ESP appears to contribute to pain control during the first 48hours after lumbar spinal fusion.
