Infraclavicular versus costoclavicular approaches to ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The costoclavicular approach to brachial plexus block may have a more favorable anatomy than the classic infraclavicular approach. However, there are conflicting results in the literature regarding the comparative effectiveness of these two techniques. METHODS: We systematically searched for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing costoclavicular with infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks for upper extremity surgeries on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ovid. The outcomes of interest were sensory and motor block onset times, performance times, block failure, and complication rate. We performed statistical analyses using RevMan 5.4 and assessed heterogeneity using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. We appraised the risk of bias according to Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool. RESULTS: We included 5 RCTs and 374 patients, of whom 189 (50.5%) were randomized to undergo costoclavicular block. We found no statistically significant differences between the two techniques regarding sensory block onset time in minutes (Mean Difference [MD = -0.39 min]; 95% CI -2.46 to 1.68 min; p = 0.71); motor block onset time in minutes (MD = -0.34 min; 95% CI -0.90 to 0.22 min; p = 0.23); performance time in minutes (MD = -0.12 min; 95% CI -0.89 to 0.64 min; p = 0.75); incidence of block failure (RR = 1.59; 95% CI 0.63 to 3.39; p = 0.63); and incidence of complications (RR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.20 to 1.84; p = 0.37). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that the CCV block may exhibit similar sensory and motor onset times when compared to the classic ICV approach in adults undergoing distal upper extremity surgery, with comparable rates of block failure and complications.

Infraclavicular versus costoclavicular approaches to ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background: The costoclavicular approach to brachial plexus block may have a more favorable anatomy than the classic infraclavicular approach. However, there are conflicting results in the literature regarding the comparative effectiveness of these two techniques. Methods: We systematically searched for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing costo-clavicular with infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks for upper extremity surgeries on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ovid. The outcomes of interest were sensory and motor block onset times, performance times, block failure, and complication rate. We performed statistical analyses using RevMan 5.4 and assessed heterogeneity using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. We appraised the risk of bias according to Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool. Results: We included 5 RCTs and 374 patients, of whom 189 (50.5%) were randomized to undergo costoclavicular block. We found no statistically significant differences between the two techniques regarding sensory block onset time in minutes (Mean Difference [MD = −0.39 min]; 95% CI −2.46 to 1.68 min; p = 0.71); motor block onset time in minutes (MD = −0.34 min; 95% CI −0.90 to 0.22 min; p = 0.23); performance time in minutes (MD = −0.12 min; 95% CI −0.89 to 0.64 min; p = 0.75); incidence of block failure (RR = 1.59; 95% CI 0.63 to 3.39; p = 0.63); and incidence of complications (RR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.20 to 1.84; p = 0.37). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that the CCV block may exhibit similar sensory and motor onset times when compared to the classic ICV approach in adults undergoing distal upper extremity surgery, with comparable rates of block failure and complications.

Application Value of Sevoflurane Combined with Brachial Plexus Block in Children with Humeral Fracture Surgery and its Effect on Hemodynamics: A Clinical and Anatomical Study

SUMMARY: To observe the effect of sevoflurane combined with brachial plexus block (BPB) in children with humeral fracture surgery and its effect on hemodynamics. 84 children who received surgical treatment of humeral fracture in our hospital from September 2019 to September 2022 were selected. According to different anesthesia methods, the children were divided into control group and study group. The control group only received laryngeal mask sevoflurane; the study group received laryngeal mask sevoflurane combined with BPB. The operation situation, hemodynamic indexes, stress level, pain and adverse reactions of children was observed. The postoperative awakening time in the study group was lower than control group, the postoperative pain onset time in the study group was higher than control group (P0.05). Postoperative 2h, the levels of serum cortisol, b-endorpin, norepinephrine and epinephrine in the study group were lower than control group (P0.05). Sevoflurane combined with BPB is helpful to shorten the postoperative awakening time of children with humeral fracture, reduce the degree of postoperative pain, improve hemodynamics, and reduce stress response, and has good safety.

El objetivo fue observar el efecto del sevoflurano combinado con bloqueo del plexo braquial (BPB) en niños con cirugía de fractura de húmero y su efecto sobre la hemodinámica. Se seleccionaron 84 niños que recibieron tratamiento quirúrgico de fractura de húmero en nuestro hospital desde septiembre de 2019 hasta septiembre de 2022. Según diferentes métodos de anestesia, los niños se dividieron en grupo control y grupo de estudio. El grupo control solo recibió sevoflurano en mascarilla laríngea; el grupo de estudio recibió sevoflurano con mascarilla laríngea combinado con BPB. Se observó la situación operatoria, índices hemodinámicos, nivel de estrés, dolor y reacciones adversas de los niños. El tiempo hasta el despertar postoperatorio en el grupo de estudio fue menor que el del grupo control, el tiempo de aparición del dolor postoperatorio en el grupo de estudio fue mayor que el del grupo control (P0,05). A las 2 horas postoperatorias, los niveles séricos de cortisol, β-endorfina, norepinefrina y epinefrina en el grupo de estudio fueron más bajos que los del grupo control (P 0,05). El sevoflurano combinado con BPB es útil para acortar el tiempo de despertar del posoperatorio de los niños con fractura de húmero, reduce el grado de dolor postoperatorio, mejora la hemodinámica y reduce la respuesta al estrés, además de tener buena seguridad.

Dexmedetomidine versus sufentanil as adjuvants to bupivacaine for brachial plexus block during upper extremity surgery: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Background: Brachial plexus block (BPB) has been accepted as a reliable alternative for general anesthesia in upper limb surgeries. Adding adjuvant drugs like dexmedetomidine and sufentanil has been shown to have clinical and pharmacologic advantages. In this randomized parallel clinical trial, we aim to compare the effects of these two adjuvants for bupivacaine in BPB. Methods: In this double-blinded study, by using computer-assisted block randomization, 40 patients ranged from 20 to 65 years old and scheduled for elective upper limb surgeries were assigned to two equal study groups (n = 20), receiving 1 mL of 5 μg.mL-1 sufentanil (group S) or 1 mL of 100 μg.mL-1 dexmedetomidine (group D) in adjunction to 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine for supraclavicular BPB under the guidance of ultrasonography. Characteristics of local anesthesia and postoperative analgesia were evaluated (n = 40). Results: The duration of blocks significantly improved in group S (sensory: estimated median difference (EMD) [95%CI] = 100.0 [70.0~130.0], p < 0.001; motor: EMD [95%CI] = 120.0 [100.0~130.0], p < 0.001). Group S also had significantly longer postoperative analgesia and lower opioid consumption within 24 hours after the surgery (EMD [95%CI] = 4.0 [3.0~7.0], p < 0.001; EMD [95%CI] = -5.0 [-5.0~-5.0], p < 0.001; respectively). None of the patients showed adverse effects concerning vital signs, nausea, or vomiting. Conclusion: Our study showed that during ultrasound-guided supraclavicular BPB, sufentanil is a fairly better choice than dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant for bupivacaine and can provide preferable sensory and motor blocks. No significant side effects were seen in either of the study groups.

Perineural low dexamethasone dose as adjuvant in supraclavicular brachial plexus block for arteriovenous fistula creation in end stage renal disease: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background and aims: Dexamethasone as adjunct to local anesthetic solution improves the quality of brachial plexus block (BPB). However, evidence for its efficacy at low doses (< 4 mg) is lacking. This study was designed to evaluate the duration of analgesia attained with low dose dexamethasone as adjuvant to local anesthetic for creation of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) under BPB. Methods: Sixty-six patients scheduled for AVF creation were randomly allocated to receive either saline (control) or 2 mg dexamethasone, together with 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.2% lignocaine. The primary outcome was duration of analgesia, defined as time from performing the block to the first analgesic request. The secondary outcomes were time from injection to complete sensory block, time from injection to complete motor block, duration of motor block, postoperative analgesic consumption, and fistula patency at three months. Results: All the blocks were effective. In the group that received dexamethasone, the time to first analgesic request was significantly delayed (432 ± 43.8 minutes vs. 386.4 ± 40.2 minutes; p < 0.01). The onset of sensory and motor blockade occurred faster in dexamethasone group and overall analgesic consumption was also reduced. However, dexamethasone addition did not prolong the duration of motor block. There was no statistically significant difference in the patency of fistulas between the two groups at three months. (p = 0.34). Conclusion: Addition of low-dose perineural dexamethasone to local anesthetic solution significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia. Further trials are warranted to compare the adverse effects between dexamethasone doses of 4 mg and lower.

Influencia de posición del brazo en adultos para abordaje de plexo braquial costoclavicular: estudio observacional / Influence of arm position in costoclavicular approach for brachial plexus block in adult patient: observational study

Resumen: Introducción: el bloqueo de plexo braquial con abordaje costoclavicular, ofrece ventajas como sitio de inyección único, sitio adecuado para colocación de catéter de analgesia continua. Objetivo: identificar la visibilidad de los tres cordones del plexo braquial en el espacio costoclavicular según la angulación del brazo. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo y transversal; se incluyeron 99 pacientes entre 18 a 90 años de edad, en un período de dos meses. Se describieron variables continuas, se aplicó la prueba no paramétrica de Friedman para K muestras relacionadas, una regresión lineal para confirmar la correlación entre la distancia de la piel a plexo braquial, peso e índice de masa corporal (IMC). Resultados: se encontró una menor profundidad en relación piel plexo bajo abducción del brazo a una angulación de 90o y 110o, que permite la visualización sonoanatómica del plexo braquial a nivel costoclavicular con significancia estadística. El peso es un factor independiente que determina la distancia entre la profundidad piel plexo. Conclusiones: se determinó que el abordaje del bloqueo costoclavicular ecoguiado es anatómicamente factible con elevada eficacia clínica, el cual concluye ser un sitio anatómico innovador y seguro.

Abstract: Introduction: the brachial plexus block with a costoclavicular approach offers advantages as a single injection site, being a suitable site for continuous analgesia catheter placement. Objective: to identify the visibility of the 3 brachial plexus cords in the costoclavicular space according to the angulation of the arm. Material and methods: a descriptive and cross-sectional observational study was carried out; 99 healthy patients between 18 and 90 years of age were included, in a period of two months. Continuous variables were described, the nonparametric Friedman test was applied for K related samples, a linear regression was performed to confirm the correlation between the distance from the skin to the brachial plexus, weight and body mass index (BMI). Results: a smaller depth was found in relation to the skin plexus under abduction of the arm at an angulation of 90o and 110o, which allows an adequate sonoanatomical visualization of the brachial plexus at the costoclavicular level with statistical significance. Weight is an independent factor that determine the distance between the skin plexus depth. Conclusions: it was determined that the ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block approach is anatomically feasible with greater clinical efficacy, which concludes to be an innovative and safe anatomical site.

Bloqueo de plexo braquial con ultrasonido: estudio descriptivo de práctica clínica habitual en 283 niños / Brachial plexus block with ultrasound: a descriptive study of routine clinical practice in 283 children

Resumen: Introducción: en años recientes con el renacimiento de la anestesia regional a causa de los avances técnicos en equipamiento como el ultrasonido, estos han permitido llevar a cabo bloqueos de plexo braquial con varias técnicas de abordaje, alta eficacia de éxito y disminución de complicaciones. Objetivo: conocer la eficacia y seguridad del bloqueo de plexo braquial con ultrasonido, en anestesiólogos con especialidad en anestesia regional. Material y métodos: se realizó el estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo de la práctica clínica habitual en 283 pacientes de 0 a 15 años, programados para cirugía electiva de ortopedia y traumatología, de extremidad superior (húmero tercio distal, codo, antebrazo y mano), con manejo anestésico: sedación más bloqueo de plexo braquial con ultrasonido abordaje supraclavicular o infraclavicular. Durante dos años, de enero de 2018 a diciembre de 2019. Resultados: los bloqueos fueron realizados por 11 anestesiólogos con especialidad en anestesia regional. Se evaluó la eficacia con 99.65% de éxito. En cuanto a la seguridad no se registraron complicaciones. Conclusiones: el uso de ultrasonido en bloqueo de plexo braquial con abordaje supraclavicular e infraclavicular es una técnica con éxito alto y sin complicaciones; sin embargo, es necesario tener capacitación y experiencia.

Abstract: Introduction: in recent years with the revival of regional anesthesia due to technical advances in equipment such as ultrasound, have allowed to carry out brachial plexus blocks with several approach techniques with high efficiency of success and reduction of complications. Objective: to know the efficacy and safety of brachial plexus block with ultrasound, in anesthesiologists with a specialty in regional anesthesia. Material and methods: the observational, descriptive, retrospective study of the usual clinical practice was carried out in 283 patients from 0 to 15 years old, scheduled for elective orthopedic surgery and traumatology, of the upper extremity (distal third humerus, elbow, forearm and hand), with anesthetic management: sedation plus brachial plexus block with ultrasound supraclavicular or infraclavicular approach. For two years from January 2018 to December 2019. Results: the blocks were performed by 11 anesthesiologists specializing in regional anesthesia. Efficacy was evaluated with 99.65% success. In terms of safety, there were no complications. Conclusions: the use of ultrasound in brachial plexus block with supraclavicular and infraclavicular approach is a technique with high success and without complications however it is necessary to have training and experience.

Dexmedetomidine versus clonidine as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic in brachial plexus blocks: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in BPBs. METHODS: Two investigators independently searched databases to identify all RCTs comparing the efficacy and/or safety of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in BPBs. All outcomes were pooled using the inverse variance method with a random-effect model. An I2 test was used to assess heterogeneity. The source of heterogeneity was explored through meta-regression. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Out of 123 full texts assessed, 24 studies (1448 patients) were included in the analysis. As compared to clonidine, dexmedetomidine groups showed significantly longer sensory block duration (MD = 173.31; 95% CI 138.02‒208.59; I2 = 99%; GRADE approach evidence: high); motor block duration (MD = 158.35; 95% CI 131.55‒185.16; I2 = 98%; GRADE approach evidence: high), duration of analgesia (MD = 203.92; 95% CI 169.25‒238.58; I2 = 99%; GRADE approach evidence- high), and provided higher grade quality of block (RR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.60‒2.41; I2 = 0%; GRADE approach evidence: moderate). The block positioning technique (regression coefficient: 51.45, p = 0.005) was observed as a significant predictor of the heterogeneity in the case of sensory block duration. No significant difference was observed for the risk of hypotension (RR = 2.59; 95% CI 0.63‒10.66; I2 = %). CONCLUSION: Moderate to high-quality evidence suggests dexmedetomidine is a more efficacious adjuvant to local anesthetic in BPBs than clonidine.

Dexmedetomidine versus sufentanil as adjuvants to bupivacaine for brachial plexus block during upper extremity surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Brachial plexus block (BPB) has been accepted as a reliable alternative for general anesthesia in upper limb surgeries. Adding adjuvant drugs like dexmedetomidine and sufentanil has been shown to have clinical and pharmacologic advantages. In this randomized parallel clinical trial, we aim to compare the effects of these two adjuvants for bupivacaine in BPB. METHODS: In this double-blinded study, by using computer-assisted block randomization, 40 patients ranged from 20 to 65 years old and scheduled for elective upper limb surgeries were assigned to two equal study groups (n = 20), receiving 1 mL of 5 ..g.mL-1 sufentanil (group S) or 1 mL of 100 ..g.mL-1 dexmedetomidine (group D) in adjunction to 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine for supraclavicular BPB under the guidance of ultrasonography. Characteristics of local anesthesia and postoperative analgesia were evaluated (n = 40). RESULTS: The duration of blocks significantly improved in group S (sensory: estimated median difference (EMD) [95%CI] = 100.0 [70.0...130.0], p < 0.001; motor: EMD [95%CI] = 120.0 [100.0...130.0], p < 0.001). Group S also had significantly longer postoperative analgesia and lower opioid consumption within 24 hours after the surgery (EMD [95%CI] = 4.0 [3.0...7.0], p < 0.001; EMD [95%CI] = -5.0 [-5.0...-5.0], p < 0.001; respectively). None of the patients showed adverse effects concerning vital signs, nausea, or vomiting. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that during ultrasound-guided supraclavicular BPB, sufentanil is a fairly better choice than dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant for bupivacaine and can provide preferable sensory and motor blocks. No significant side effects were seen in either of the study groups.

Perineural low dexamethasone dose as adjuvant in supraclavicular brachial plexus block for arteriovenous fistula creation in end stage renal disease: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dexamethasone as adjunct to local anesthetic solution improves the quality of brachial plexus block (BPB). However, evidence for its efficacy at low doses (< 4 mg) is lacking. This study was designed to evaluate the duration of analgesia attained with low dose dexamethasone as adjuvant to local anesthetic for creation of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) under BPB. METHODS: Sixty-six patients scheduled for AVF creation were randomly allocated to receive either saline (control) or 2 mg dexamethasone, together with 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.2% lignocaine. The primary outcome was duration of analgesia, defined as time from performing the block to the first analgesic request. The secondary outcomes were time from injection to complete sensory block, time from injection to complete motor block, duration of motor block, postoperative analgesic consumption, and fistula patency at three months. RESULTS: All the blocks were effective. In the group that received dexamethasone, the time to first analgesic request was significantly delayed (432 ± 43.8 minutes vs. 386.4 ± 40.2 minutes; p < 0.01). The onset of sensory and motor blockade occurred faster in dexamethasone group and overall analgesic consumption was also reduced. However, dexamethasone addition did not prolong the duration of motor block. There was no statistically significant difference in the patency of fistulas between the two groups at three months. (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Addition of low-dose perineural dexamethasone to local anesthetic solution significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia. Further trials are warranted to compare the adverse effects between dexamethasone doses of 4 mg and lower.

Dexmedetomidine versus clonidine as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic in brachial plexus blocks: a metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials

Abstract Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and Clonidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in BPBs. Methods: Two investigators independently searched databases to identify all RCTs comparing the efficacy and/or safety of dexmedetomidine and Clonidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in BPBs. All outcomes were pooled using the inverse variance method with a random-effect model. An I2 test was used to assess heterogeneity. The source of heterogeneity was explored through meta-regression. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Results: Out of 123 full texts assessed, 24 studies (1448 patients) were included in the analysis. As compared to Clonidine, dexmedetomidine groups showed significantly longer sensory block duration (MD = 173.31; 95% CI 138.02-208.59; I2 = 99%; GRADE approach evidence: high); motor block duration (MD = 158.35; 95% CI 131.55-185.16; I2 = 98%; GRADE approach evidence: high), duration of analgesia (MD = 203.92; 95% CI 169.25-238.58; I2 = 99%; GRADE approach evidence-high), and provided higher grade quality of block (RR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.60-2.41 ; I2 = 0%; GRADE approach evidence: moderate). The block positioning technique (regression coefficient: 51.45, p = 0.005) was observed as a significant predictor of the heterogeneity in the case of sensory block duration. No significant difference was observed for the risk of hypotension (RR = 2.59; 95% CI 0.63-10.66; I2 = %). Conclusion: Moderate to high-quality evidence suggests dexmedetomidine is a more efficacious adjuvant to local anesthetic in BPBs than Clonidine.

Efectividad del bloqueo de plexo braquial con abordaje costoclavicular y factores que modifican la sonoanatomía en pacientes pediátricos / Effectiveness of brachial plexus block with costoclavicular approach and factors modifying sonoanatomy in pediatric patients

Resumen: El bloqueo de plexo braquial en pediatría se ha posicionado como una buena alternativa para procedimientos quirúrgicos de la extremidad superior, en especial a partir del advenimiento de la ultrasonografía. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la efectividad del bloqueo con el abordaje costoclavicular en la población pediátrica, comparar la sonoanatomía de la ventana costoclavicular con la coracoidea y determinar si la posición del brazo impacta en la imagen ultrasonográfica. Se evaluaron un total de ocho pacientes con fracturas de miembro superior. De los ocho pacientes, cinco eran de género masculino (62.5%), tres de género femenino (37.5%) con una edad promedio de 8.8 años. Se realizó rastreo ultrasonográfico comparando la sonoanatomía del abordaje costoclavicular y coracoideos, observando mejor los cordones del plexo braquial y estructuras vasculares con el abordaje costoclavicular. Con el brazo en abducción 90 y 110o se optimizó la visualización de las estructuras neurovasculares y mejoría en la calidad del bloqueo. La dosis de ropivacaína fue de 1.5 mg/kg entre el 0.3-0.5%, con un tiempo de bloqueo motor promedio de 6.4 horas, y bloqueo sensitivo promedio de 11 horas. No se presentaron complicaciones. En conclusión, el bloqueo de plexo braquial por vía costoclavicular en la población pediátrica es una técnica segura.

Abstract: Pediatric brachial plexus block has become a good alternative for upper extremity surgical procedures, especially since the advent of ultrasonography. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the blockade with the costoclavicular approach in the pediatric population, and compare the sonoanatomy of the costoclavicular window with the coracoid one, and determinate if the position of the arm has an impact on the ultrasound image. A total of eight patients with upper limb fractures were evaluated. Of the eight patients, five were male (62.5%), three female (37.5%) with a mean age of 8.8 years. Ultrasonographic screening was performed comparing the sonoanatomy of the costoclavicular and coracoid approaches, better observing the brachial plexus cords and vascular structures with the costoclavicular approach. With the arm abducted 90 and 110o, a better visualization of the neurovascular structures and an improvement in the quality of the block was obtained. The ropivacaine dose was 1.5 mg/kg between 0.3-0.5%, with an average motor block time of 6.7 hours, and an average sensory block of 11.25 hours. There were not complications. In conclusion, the brachial plexus block via the costoclavicular approach in the pediatric population is a safe technique.

Evaluación de la parálisis diafragmática con ultrasonido y espirometría: comparación del bloqueo supraclavicular vs bloqueo interescalénico en cirugía de hombro / Evaluation of diaphragmatic paralysis with ultrasound and spirometry: comparison of supraclavicular vs interscalene block in shoulder surgery

Resumen: Introducción: la cirugía artroscópica de hombro ha ganado popularidad recientemente; sin embargo, el dolor postquirúrgico se reporta de moderado a severo. La anestesia regional es útil para el control del dolor postquirúrgico. El bloqueo interescalénico y supraclavicular produce parálisis diafragmática en diferente proporción. Se busca encontrar cuál es el porcentaje y duración de la parálisis hemidiafragmática mediante mediciones ultrasonográficas, correlacionadas con espirometría comparando el abordaje supraclavicular con interescalénico. Material y métodos: ensayo clínico, controlado y aleatorizado. Se incluyeron 52 pacientes entre 18 y 90 años, programados para cirugía artroscópica de hombro, divididos en dos grupos (bloqueo interescalénico y supraclavicular). Se midió la excursión diafragmática y se realizó una espirometría previo al ingreso al quirófano y a las 24 horas de instalación del bloqueo, el estudio concluyó a las 24 horas del evento anestésico. Resultados: la capacidad vital se redujo en 0.7% en el grupo del bloqueo supraclavicular y 7.7% en el grupo interescalénico, el VEF1 se redujo en 0.2% en el supraclavicular y 9.5% en el interescalénico con una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p = 0.001). La parálisis diafragmática en ventilación espontánea se presentó en ambos abordajes a los 30 minutos, sin diferencia significativa. A las seis y ocho horas continuó la parálisis en el grupo interescalénico, mientras que en el abordaje supraclavicular se mantuvo en comparación con la basal. Conclusiones: el bloqueo supraclavicular resulta tan efectivo como el bloqueo interescalénico en la cirugía artroscópica de hombro, con menor bloqueo diafragmático (1.5 veces más parálisis diafragmática en el interescalénico).

Abstract: Introduction: arthroscopic shoulder surgery has recently gained popularity, however, postoperative pain is reported as moderate to severe. Regional anesthesia is useful for the control of postoperative pain. Interscalene and supraclavicular blocks produce diaphragmatic paralysis in different proportions. The aim of this study is to find the percentage and duration of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, by means of ultrasonographic measurements, correlated with spirometry, comparing the supraclavicular approach with interscalene. Material and methods: clinical, controlled and randomized trial. Fifty-two patients, between 18 and 90 years of age, scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery were included, divided into 2 groups (interscalene or supraclavicular block). Diaphragmatic excursion was measured and spirometry was performed prior to admission to the operating room and 24 hours after installation of the block, the study concluded 24 hours after the anesthetic event. Results: vital capacity was reduced by 0.7% in the supraclavicular block and 7.7% for the interscalene, FEV1 was reduced by 0.2% for the supraclavicular and 9.5% in the interscalene with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). Diaphragmatic paralysis in spontaneous ventilation appeared in both approaches at 30 minutes, without significant difference. At 6 and 8 hours, paralysis continued in the interscalene group, while in the supraclavicular approach it remained preserved compared to the baseline. Conclusions: supraclavicular block is as effective as interscalene block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery, with less diaphragmatic block (1.5 times more diaphragmatic paralysis in interscalene).

Determination of the minimum effective volume of bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a prospective, observer-blind, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the minimum effective volume (MEV) of 0.5% bupivacaine for infraclavicular brachial plexus block. METHODS: We assigned patients to volume groups consisting of five consecutive patients. Local anesthetic was sequentially reduced from a starting dose of 30 mL by 2 mL to form the volume groups. Five patients were included in each volume group, and at least 3 of 5 injections had to be successful to consider the volume of the anesthetic as sufficient. The study ended when the anesthetic volume of a group was determined to be unsuccessful (two or fewer successful blocks). Block was successful if the patient reported a sensorial block score of 7 or more on an 8-point scale and sensorial and motor block's total score of 14 on a 16-point scale. RESULTS: The MEV of 0.5% bupivacaine for infraclavicular brachial plexus block was 14 mL. A successful block was achieved in all patients (n = 45) in 9 volume groups, which received 30 mL down to 14 mL. Three blocks were unsuccessful in the 12-mL group. Time to onset of block and time to first postoperative anesthetic administration was 15 (10-15) min and more than 24 h in the 30-mL bupivacaine group, but 40 (30-45) min and 14 (10-24) h were determined for the 14-mL group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The MEV of 0.5% bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block was 14 mL. However, this low-dose block has a long onset time of 40 (30-45) min on average.

[Evaluation of diaphragmatic paralysis with ultrasound and spirometry: comparison of supraclavicular vs interscalene block in shoulder surgery]. / Evaluación de la parálisis diafragmática con ultrasonido y espirometría: comparación del bloqueo supraclavicular vs bloqueo interescalénico en cirugía de hombro.

INTRODUCTION: arthroscopic shoulder surgery has recently gained popularity, however, postoperative pain is reported as moderate to severe. Regional anesthesia is useful for the control of postoperative pain. Interscalene and supraclavicular blocks produce diaphragmatic paralysis in different proportions. The aim of this study is to find the percentage and duration of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, by means of ultrasonographic measurements, correlated with spirometry, comparing the supraclavicular approach with interscalene. MATERIAL AND METHODS: clinical, controlled and randomized trial. Fifty-two patients, between 18 and 90 years of age, scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery were included, divided into 2 groups (interscalene or supraclavicular block). Diaphragmatic excursion was measured and spirometry was performed prior to admission to the operating room and 24 hours after installation of the block, the study concluded 24 hours after the anesthetic event. RESULTS: vital capacity was reduced by 0.7% in the supraclavicular block and 7.7% for the interscalene, FEV1 was reduced by 0.2% for the supraclavicular and 9.5% in the interscalene with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). Diaphragmatic paralysis in spontaneous ventilation appeared in both approaches at 30 minutes, without significant difference. At 6 and 8 hours, paralysis continued in the interscalene group, while in the supraclavicular approach it remained preserved compared to the baseline. CONCLUSIONS: supraclavicular block is as effective as interscalene block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery, with less diaphragmatic block (1.5 times more diaphragmatic paralysis in interscalene).

INTRODUCCIÓN: la cirugía artroscópica de hombro ha ganado popularidad recientemente; sin embargo, el dolor postquirúrgico se reporta de moderado a severo. La anestesia regional es útil para el control del dolor postquirúrgico. El bloqueo interescalénico y supraclavicular produce parálisis diafragmática en diferente proporción. Se busca encontrar cuál es el porcentaje y duración de la parálisis hemidiafragmática mediante mediciones ultrasonográficas, correlacionadas con espirometría comparando el abordaje supraclavicular con interescalénico. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: ensayo clínico, controlado y aleatorizado. Se incluyeron 52 pacientes entre 18 y 90 años, programados para cirugía artroscópica de hombro, divididos en dos grupos (bloqueo interescalénico y supraclavicular). Se midió la excursión diafragmática y se realizó una espirometría previo al ingreso al quirófano y a las 24 horas de instalación del bloqueo, el estudio concluyó a las 24 horas del evento anestésico. RESULTADOS: la capacidad vital se redujo en 0.7% en el grupo del bloqueo supraclavicular y 7.7% en el grupo interescalénico, el VEF1 se redujo en 0.2% en el supraclavicular y 9.5% en el interescalénico con una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p = 0.001). La parálisis diafragmática en ventilación espontánea se presentó en ambos abordajes a los 30 minutos, sin diferencia significativa. A las seis y ocho horas continuó la parálisis en el grupo interescalénico, mientras que en el abordaje supraclavicular se mantuvo en comparación con la basal. CONCLUSIONES: el bloqueo supraclavicular resulta tan efectivo como el bloqueo interescalénico en la cirugía artroscópica de hombro, con menor bloqueo diafragmático (1.5 veces más parálisis diafragmática en el interescalénico).

Comparison of the lateral sagittal and costoclavicular approaches for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block in pediatric patients: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The lateral sagittal brachial plexus block is the most used method for pediatric upper extremity surgery, whereas the applications of costoclavicular brachial plexus block are limited. This study aimed to compare the lateral sagittal and costoclavicular approaches for the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block in pediatric patients. METHODS: Sixty pediatric patients aged 5-15 years undergoing hand or forearm surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. Group LS (n = 30) received ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal block, and Group CC (n = 30) received ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block. The block performing time, needling time, imaging time, needle visibility, number of passes, sensorial/motor block time, and postoperative pain scores were evaluated. RESULTS: The needling time (82.90 ± 28.17 seconds vs. 64.77 ± 28.11 seconds respectively, p = 0.004) and total block performance time (109.53 ± 29.75 seconds vs. 89.70 ± 29.98 seconds respectively, p = 0.005) were significantly longer in Group LS than in Group CC. However, there was no significant difference between the groups in imaging time, needle visibility, number of passes, sensorial/motor block time, and postoperative pain scores (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Costoclavicular and lateral sagittal brachial plexus blocks resulted in similar anesthetics effects. Moreover, the costoclavicular method can be a better alternative to lateral sagittal as it has a shorter block performance time.

Perineural dexamethasone in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block with levobupivacaine for shoulder arthroscopic surgery in the outpatient setting: randomized controlled trial / Dexametasona perineural em bloqueio de plexo braquial interescalênico com levobupivacaína guiado por ultrassonografia para artroscopia de ombro em regime ambulatorial: ensaio clínico controlado e randomizado

Abstract Background and objectives: In shoulder arthroscopy, on an outpatient basis, the patient needs a good control of the postoperative pain that can be achieved through regional blocks. Perineural dexamethasone may prolong the effect of these blocks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of perineural dexamethasone on the prolongation of the sensory block in the postoperative period for arthroscopic shoulder surgery in outpatient setting. Methods: After approval by the Research Ethics Committee and informed consent, patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia and ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block were randomized into Group D - blockade performed with 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine with vasoconstrictor and 6 mg (1.5 mL) of dexamethasone and Group C - 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine with vasoconstrictor and 1.5 mL of 0.9% saline. The duration of the sensory block was evaluated in 4 postoperative moments (0, 4, 12 and 24 hours) as well as the need for rescue analgesia, nausea and vomiting incidence, and Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS). Results: Seventy-four patients were recruited and 71 completed the study (Group C, n = 37; Group D, n = 34). Our findings showed a prolongation of the mean time of the sensitive blockade in Group D (1440 ± 0 min vs. 1267 ± 164 min, p < 0.001). It was observed that Group C had a higher mean pain score according to VAS (2.08 ± 1.72 vs. 0.02 ± 0.17, p < 0.001) and a greater number of patients (68.4% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) required rescue analgesia in the first 24 hours. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Perineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged the sensory blockade promoted by levobupivacaine in interscalene brachial plexus block, reduced pain intensity and rescue analgesia needs in the postoperative period.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Na artroscopia de ombro em regime ambulatorial, o paciente necessita de um bom controle da dor pós-operatória, que pode ser conseguido por meio de bloqueios regionais. A dexametasona perineural pode prolongar o efeito desses bloqueios. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da dexametasona perineural quanto ao prolongamento do bloqueio sensitivo no período pós-operatório para cirurgia artroscópica de ombro em regime ambulatorial. Métodos: Após aprovação do Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa e consentimento informado, foram incluídos no estudo pacientes submetidos a cirurgia artroscópica de ombro sob anestesia geral e bloqueio de plexo braquial interescalênico guiado por ultrassonografia. Eles foram randomizados nos Grupo D - bloqueio com 30 mL de levobupivacaína 0,5% com vasoconstritor e 6 mg (1,5 mL) de dexametasona, e Grupo C - bloqueio com 30 mL de levobupivacaína 0,5% com vasoconstritor e 1,5 mL solução salina. A duração do bloqueio sensitivo foi avaliada em quatro momentos pós-operatórios (0, 4, 12 e 24 horas), assim como a necessidade de analgesia de resgate, incidência de náuseas e vômitos e Escala Visual Analógica de Dor (EVA). Resultados: Setenta e quatro pacientes foram randomizados e 71 completaram o estudo (Grupo C, n = 37; Grupo D, n = 34). Observou-se um prolongamento do tempo médio de bloqueio sensitivo no Grupo D (1440 ± 0 min vs. 1267 ± 164 min; p< 0,001). Pacientes do Grupo C apresentaram maior média de escore de dor de acordo com a EVA (2,08 ± 1,72vs. 0,02 ± 0,17; p< 0,001) e um maior número de pacientes solicitou analgesia de resgate nas primeiras 24 horas (68,4%vs.0%; p< 0,001). A incidência de náuseas e vômitos não foi estatisticamente significante. Conclusão: A dexametasona perineural prolongou significativamente o bloqueio sensitivo da levobupivacaína no bloqueio de plexo braquial interescalênico, reduziu a intensidade de dor e a necessidade de analgesia de resgate pelo paciente no período pós-operatório.

[Perineural dexamethasone in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block with levobupivacaine for shoulder arthroscopic surgery in the outpatient setting: randomized controlled trial]. / Dexametasona perineural em bloqueio de plexo braquial interescalênico com levobupivacaína guiado por ultrassonografia para artroscopia de ombro em regime ambulatorial: ensaio clínico controlado e randomizado.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In shoulder arthroscopy, on an outpatient basis, the patient needs a good control of the postoperative pain that can be achieved through regional blocks. Perineural dexamethasone may prolong the effect of these blocks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of perineural dexamethasone on the prolongation of the sensory block in the postoperative period for arthroscopic shoulder surgery in outpatient setting. METHODS: After approval by the Research Ethics Committee and informed consent, patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia and ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block were randomized into Group D - blockade performed with 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine with vasoconstrictor and 6 mg (1.5 mL) of dexamethasone and Group C - 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine with vasoconstrictor and 1.5 mL of 0.9% saline. The duration of the sensory block was evaluated in 4 postoperative moments (0, 4, 12 and 24 hours) as well as the need for rescue analgesia, nausea and vomiting incidence, and Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS). RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were recruited and 71 completed the study (Group C, n=37; Group D, n=34). Our findings showed a prolongation of the mean time of the sensitive blockade in Group D (1440±0 min vs. 1267±164 min, p<0.001). It was observed that Group C had a higher mean pain score according to VAS (2.08±1.72 vs. 0.02±0.17, p <0.001) and a greater number of patients (68.4% vs. 0%, p <0.001) required rescue analgesia in the first 24 hours. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Perineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged the sensory blockade promoted by levobupivacaine in interscalene brachial plexus block, reduced pain intensity and rescue analgesia needs in the postoperative period.

Continuous suprascapular nerve block compared with single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block for pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

OBJECTIVES: We compared the analgesic efficacy of a continuous suprascapular nerve block (C-SSNB) and a single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block (S-ISNB) for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: A total of 118 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomly allocated to the S-ISNB or C-SSNB groups. Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Supplemental analgesic use was recorded as total equianalgesic fentanyl consumption. RESULTS: The C-SSNB group showed significantly higher VAS scores at 0−1 h and 1−2 h after the surgery than the S-ISNB group (4.9±2.2 versus 2.3±2.2; p<0.0001 and 4.8±2.1 versus 2.4±2.3; p<0.0001, respectively). The C-SSNB group showed significantly lower VAS scores at 6−12 h after the surgery than the S-ISNB group (4.1±1.8 versus. 5.0±2.5; p=0.031). The C-SSNB group required significantly higher doses of total equianalgesic fentanyl in the post-anesthesia care unit than the S-ISNB group (53.66±44.95 versus 5.93±18.25; p<0.0001). Total equianalgesic fentanyl in the ward and total equianalgesic fentanyl throughout the hospital period were similar between the groups (145.99±152.60 versus 206.13±178.79; p=0.052 and 199.72±165.50 versus 212.15±180.09; p=0.697, respectively) CONCLUSION: C-SSNB was more effective than S-ISNB at 6−12 h after the surgery for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis with continuous interscalene block and diluted solutions of levobupivacaine / Bloqueo interescalénico y parálisis diafragmática con dosis diluidas de levobupivacaína

The continuous interscalene block represents the analgesic standard for shoulder surgery. However, the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis can reach up to 100% of cases. We hypothesized that more dilute local anesthetics would decrease the phrenic palsy at 24 hours. METHODS: Prospective series of patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery with continuous interscalene block. A 15-ml bolus of lidocaine 1%-levobupivacaine 0.25% plus an infusion of levobupivacaine 0.04% at an 8 mL/h rate plus 5 mL boluses on-demand with a 20-minutes lockout was used until discharge. Hemidiaphragmatic excursion was evaluated with M-mode ultrasound in the subcostal region before blocks, in the post-anesthetic unit, and at 24 h. The primary outcome was the presence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, amount of rescue boluses, postoperative opioids consumption, and side effects. RESULTS: Thirty patients were recruited and analyzed. The incidence of diaphragm paralysis at 24 h was 96.7%. The median [IQR] of pain at rest (patients with shoulder immobilizer) in a NRS from 0 to 10 at 0.5; 1; 3; 6; 12; 24; 48; 72 hours were 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-2]; 0 [0-2.5]; 0 [0-2], respectively. The median [IQR] consumption of LA boluses was 1.5 [0-7]. There were no postoperative morphine requirements. The most frequent side effect was Horner´s syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous interscalene block with 0.04% levobupivacaine provides adequate analgesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery but does not prevent hemidiaphragmatic paralysis at 24 hours under the conditions of this study.

El bloqueo interescalénico representa el estándar analgésico para cirugía de hombro. No obstante, la incidencia de parálisis hemidiafragmática puede alcanzar 100% de los casos. Nuestra hipótesis es que infusiones con anestésicos locales más diluidos disminuirían la PHD 24 horas postbloqueo. MÉTODOS: Serie prospectiva de pacientes sometidos a cirugía artroscópica electiva de hombro con bloqueo interescalénico continuo. Un bolo de 15 mL de lidocaína 1%-levobupivacaína 0,5% más infusión postoperatoria de levobupivacaína al 0,04% a 8 ml/h más bolos a demanda de 5 mL con intervalo de 20 minutos hasta el alta. La excursión hemidiafragmática se evaluó con ultrasonido con transductor curvo 2-5 MHz en modo M en la región infracostal antes del bloqueo, en la unidad postanestésica y a las 24 h, antes del alta. El outcome primario fue la presencia de parálisis hemidiafragmática 24 horas postbloqueo. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron dolor postoperatorio, total de bolos de rescate, requerimiento de opioides postoperatorios y efectos secundarios. RESULTADOS: Treinta pacientes fueron reclutados y analizados. La incidencia de PHD a las 24 h fue 96,7%. La mediana [RIC] de dolor en reposo (pacientes con inmovilizador de hombro) medido en escala numérica de 0 a 10, a las 0,5; 1; 3; 6; 12; 24; 48; 72 horas fueron 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-0]; 0 [0-2]; 0 [0-2.5]; 0 [0-2] respectivamente. La mediana [RIC] de consumo de bolos de rescate fue 1,5 [0-7]. No hubo pacientes con requerimientos de morfina postoperatoria. El efecto colateral más frecuente fue el síndrome de Horner. CONCLUSIONES: El bloqueo interescalénico continuo con levobupivacaína 0,04% proporciona analgesia postoperatoria adecuada, pero no evita la PHD a las 24 h en las condiciones de esta serie.