A Comparison of Distal Nerve Blocks and Brachial Plexus Blocks in Terms of Block Success, Block-related Characteristics, Time to Discharge and Patient Satisfaction.

Background: Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks (BPB) are used as an anaesthetic method in hand and wrist surgeries. The radial, median and ulnar nerves can also be selectively blocked. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to compare distal nerve blocks (DNB) and BPB in terms of block success, block-related characteristics, time to discharge and patient satisfaction. Methods: The data of patients who underwent elective hand and wrist surgery under regional anaesthetic procedures between 01.01.2022 and 01.09.2022 were analysed. Standard multimodal analgesia was performed in all groups, in addition to either ultrasound-guided BPB or DNB. Demographic characteristics, American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) classes, presence of additional diseases, block and volume applied, block-related data such as block performance time, onset time, initial analgesia times, perioperative additional anaesthetic or analgesic requirement, surgery times, types of surgery, discharge times and the presence of additional complaints were recorded. In addition, the anaesthesia quality score were determined using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: There was no difference between demographic data. Average surgical time was similar between the DNB and BPB groups (46.0 ± 8.92 vs. 59.95 ± 22.04 min, p < 0.05). Block onset time was significantly lower in the DNB group (26.4 ± 2.73 vs. 32.17 ± 2.94 min, p < 0.001). When patients discharged before and after 12 hours were compared, 11/22 of the patients in the DNB group and 4/23 of the patients in the BPB group were discharged in the first 12 hours (p < 0.05). Patient satisfaction scores were similar between groups (14.22 ± 0.86 vs. 13.65 ± 1.11, p > 0.05). Conclusions: In surgeries of the hand and wrist, the radial, median and ulnar nerves can be used individually or in combination as an alternative to proximal BPB. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Debridement of axillary necrotizing fasciitis under anesthetic blocks of the serratus plane and supraclavicular brachial plexus: a case report

Abstract The regional techniques for axillary analgesia are well established. However, few studies have investigated surgical anesthesia. In this report, extensive debridement of axillary necrotizing fasciitis, including the posteromedial region of the right arm, performed under exclusive regional anesthesia in a patient with probable difficult airway is described. The procedure was accomplished under a Serratus Plane Block (SPB) and supraclavicular brachial plexus block, guided by ultrasound, and with venous sedation. We observed satisfactory anesthesia 15 minutes after the intervention, efficient intraoperative pain control and within the following 24 hours. Surgical axilla anesthesia is feasible with the described blocks.

Debridement of axillary necrotizing fasciitis under anesthetic blocks of the serratus plane and supraclavicular brachial plexus: a case report.

The regional techniques for axillary analgesia are well established. However, few studies have investigated surgical anesthesia. In this report, extensive debridement of axillary necrotizing fasciitis, including the posteromedial region of the right arm, performed under exclusive regional anesthesia in a patient with probable difficult airway is described. The procedure was accomplished under a Serratus Plane Block (SPB) and supraclavicular brachial plexus block, guided by ultrasound, and with venous sedation. We observed satisfactory anesthesia 15 minutes after the intervention, efficient intraoperative pain control and within the following 24.Çëhours. Surgical axilla anesthesia is feasible with the described blocks.

Selective blockade of supraclavicular nerves and upper trunk of brachial plexus "The SCUT block" towards a site-specific regional anaesthesia strategy for clavicle surgeries - A descriptive study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Commonly, the superficial cervical plexus and interscalene block were combined to provide surgical anaesthesia for procedures on the clavicle, which are neither selective nor site-specific considering the innervation of the clavicle. The aim was to analyse effectiveness and block dynamics of selectively blocking supraclavicular (SC) nerves and upper trunk (UT) of brachial plexus (SCUT BLOCK) as a site-specific regional anaesthesia strategy for clavicle surgery. METHODS: SC nerves and UT were blocked with 3-ml and 5-ml local anaesthetic, respectively, in 70 American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients aged above 18 years, undergoing clavicle surgery. Sensory-motor conduction blockade was assessed in both the plexus territories, following which surgery ensued. Number of patients who exhibited complete conduction blockade of the targeted nerves, number of surgeries completed under the block, intraoperative rescue analgesics, duration of postoperative analgesia and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Sensory and motor mapping showed complete conduction blockade of the targeted nerves in all patients, all other branches were spared. The surgery was completed exclusively under block in 67 (Strategy success rate 96%) out of 70 patients. Intraoperatively, two patients required supplementation of block with a local infiltration and general anaesthesia was administered for one patient. The mean duration of postoperative analgesia was 5 (1.2) hours [mean (standard deviation)]. Only one patient developed ptosis; no other complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: "The SCUT block" is an effective site-specific regional anaesthesia strategy for clavicle surgery.

The effect of wide-awake anesthesia, intravenous regional anesthesia, and infraclavicular brachial plexus block on cost and clinical scores of patients undergoing hand surgery.

The aim of our study was to compare the clinical results and costs of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT), intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA), and infraclavicular brachial plexus block (IC-BPB). The patients were divided into WALANT, IVRA, IC-BPB groups, each with 50 patients. Demographic information, induction time, use of sedation, number of patients who were converted to general anesthesia, time in postanesthesia care unit (PACU), amount of bleeding during surgery, presence of tourniquet pain, hand motor function during surgery, time to onset of postanesthesia pain, discharge time, complications, and anesthesia costs were compared. Sedation was given to 12 IC-BPB patients, 9 IVRA patients and 5 WALANT patients. Of these patients, 6 undergoing IC-BPB, 5 undergoing IVRA and 4 undergoing WALANT were converted to general anesthesia (p = 0.80). PACU time and anesthesia costs were the least in the WALANT group, followed by the IVRA group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Intraoperative active voluntary movements were best preserved in the WALANT group; however, bleeding was highest in the WALANT group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Tourniquet pain was the higher in the IVRA groups, while postoperative pain in the surgical area developed the fastest in this same group (p = 0.029, p < 0.001). Time to discharge was similar in WALANT and IVRA groups, and the longest in the IC-BPB (p < 0.001) group. There was no difference among the groups in terms of patient satisfaction (p = 0.085, p = 0.242 for the first and second survey question). In the current study, WALANT appears to be a suitable alternative to IVRA and IC-BPB methods, with better preservation of active intraoperative movement, lower cost, and shorter time spent in PACU at the expense of higher bleeding.

YouTube as an informational source for brachial plexus blocks: evaluation of content and educational value / YouTube como fonte informativa sobre bloqueios do plexo braquial: avaliação de conteúdo e valor educativo

Abstract Background and objectives: YouTube, the most popular video-sharing website, contains a significant number of medical videos including brachial plexus nerve blocks. Despite the widespread use of this platform as a medical information source, there is no regulation for the quality or content of the videos. The goals of this study are to evaluate the content of material on YouTube relevant to performance of brachial plexus nerve blocks and its quality as a visual digital information source. Methods: The YouTube search was performed using keywords associated with brachial plexus nerve blocks and the final 86 videos out of 374 were included in the watch list. The assessors scored the videos separately according to the Questionnaires. Questionnaire-1 (Q1) was prepared according to the ASRA guidelines/Miller's Anesthesia as a reference text book, and Questionnaire-2 (Q2) was formulated using a modification of the criteria in Evaluation of Video Media Guidelines. Results: 72 ultrasound-guided and 14 nerve-stimulator guided block videos were evaluated. In Q1, for ultrasound-guided videos, the least scores were for Q1-5 (1.38) regarding the complications, and the greatest scores were for Q1-13 (3.30) regarding the sono-anatomic image. In videos with nerve stimulator, the lowest and the highest scores were given for Q1-7 (1.64) regarding the equipment and Q1-12 (3.60) regarding the explanation of muscle twitches respectively. In Q2, 65.3% of ultrasound-guided and 42.8% of blocks with nerve-stimulator had worse than satisfactory scores. Conclusion: The majority of the videos examined for this study lack the comprehensive approach necessary to safely guide someone seeking information about brachial plexus nerve blocks.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: O YouTube, site de compartilhamento de vídeos mais popular, contém um número significativo de vídeos médicos, incluindo bloqueios do plexo braquial. Apesar do uso generalizado dessa plataforma como fonte de informação médica, não há regulamentação para a qualidade ou o conteúdo dos vídeos. O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar o conteúdo do material no YouTube relevante para o desempenho do bloqueio do plexo braquial e sua qualidade como fonte de informação visual digital. Métodos: A pesquisa no YouTube foi realizada usando palavras-chave associadas ao bloqueio do plexo braquial e, de 374 vídeos, 86 foram incluídos na lista de observação. Os avaliadores classificaram os vídeos separadamente, de acordo com os questionários. O questionário-1 (Q1) foi preparado de acordo com as diretrizes da ASRA/Miller's Anesthesia como livro de referência e o Questionário-2 (Q2) foi formulado usando uma modificação dos critérios em Avaliação de Diretrizes para Mídia de Vídeo. Resultados: No total, 72 vídeos sobre bloqueios guiados por ultrassom e 14 vídeos sobre bloqueios com estimulador de nervos foram avaliados. No Q1, para os vídeos apresentando bloqueios guiados por ultrassom, os menores escores foram para Q1-5 (1,38) em relação às complicações e os maiores escores foram para Q1-13 (3,30) em relação à imagem sonoanatômica. Nos vídeos que apresentaram bloqueios com estimulador de nervos, os menores e os maiores escores foram dados para Q1-7 (1,64) em relação ao equipamento e Q1-12 (3,60) em relação à explicação das contrações musculares, respectivamente. No Q2, 65,3% dos bloqueios guiados por ultrassom e 42,8% dos bloqueios com estimulador de nervos apresentaram escores abaixo de satisfatórios. Conclusões: A maioria dos vídeos examinados para este estudo carece da abordagem abrangente necessária para orientar com segurança as pessoas que buscam informações sobre o bloqueio do plexo braquial.

[YouTube as an informational source for brachial plexus blocks: evaluation of content and educational value]. / YouTube como fonte informativa sobre bloqueios do plexo braquial: avaliação de conteúdo e valor educativo.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: YouTube, the most popular video-sharing website, contains a significant number of medical videos including brachial plexus nerve blocks. Despite the widespread use of this platform as a medical information source, there is no regulation for the quality or content of the videos. The goals of this study are to evaluate the content of material on YouTube relevant to performance of brachial plexus nerve blocks and its quality as a visual digital information source. METHODS: The YouTube search was performed using keywords associated with brachial plexus nerve blocks and the final 86 videos out of 374 were included in the watch list. The assessors scored the videos separately according to the Questionnaires. Questionnaire-1 (Q1) was prepared according to the ASRA guidelines/Miller's Anesthesia as a reference text book, and Questionnaire-2 (Q2) was formulated using a modification of the criteria in Evaluation of Video Media Guidelines. RESULTS: 72 ultrasound-guided and 14 nerve-stimulator guided block videos were evaluated. In Q1, for ultrasound-guided videos, the least scores were for Q1-5 (1.38) regarding the complications, and the greatest scores were for Q1-13 (3.30) regarding the sono-anatomic image. In videos with nerve stimulator, the lowest and the highest scores were given for Q1-7 (1.64) regarding the equipment and Q1-12 (3.60) regarding the explanation of muscle twitches respectively. In Q2, 65.3% of ultrasound-guided and 42.8% of blocks with nerve-stimulator had worse than satisfactory scores. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the videos examined for this study lack the comprehensive approach necessary to safely guide someone seeking information about brachial plexus nerve blocks.

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Properties in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

PURPOSE: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 may have subclinical peripheral nerve neuropathy. We performed this study to compare the differences in duration of axillary brachial plexus blocks in patients with type 2 DM and without DM (NODM). Our hypothesis was that the sensory block duration would be prolonged in patients with DM. METHODS: A total of 71 patients who were scheduled for elective forearm and/or hand surgery were enrolled in this study. Before surgery, they received ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks with a mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%. After surgery, all patients received 1 g paracetamol every 6 hours as needed. The primary end point was sensory block duration. Secondary end points were motor block duration, time until first pain (numeric rating scale [NRS] 4 or greater), highest NRS pain scores, and rescue analgesic consumption (NRS 4 or greater) through the first 2 postoperative days. RESULTS: In all, 67 patients completed the study: 22 in the DM group and 45 in the NODM group. Sensory and motor block durations were longer in the DM group than in the NODM group (mean [range], 773.5 [479-1155] vs 375 [113-900] minutes, and 523 [205-955] vs 300 [110-680] minutes). Time until first pain was 855 (590-1,285) minutes in the DM group and 500 (200-990) minutes in the NODM group. The highest NRS scores were also significantly lower in the DM group at 6 and 12 hours. Paracetamol consumption was lower in the DM group through the first 2 postoperative days. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of DM was associated with longer duration of the sensory block after axillary brachial plexus block. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

Ultrasound-guided Continuous Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Using a Nerve Stimulating Catheter: EpiStim® Catheter.

Brachial plexus block (BPB) under ultrasound guidance has come to be widely used. However, nerve injury has been reported following ultrasound-guided BPB. We hypothesized that BPB under ultrasound guidance in conjunction with real-time electrical nerve stimulation would help us prevent nerve injury and do more successful procedure. Here, we report the successful induction and maintenance of ultrasound-guided BPB and the achievement of good peri- and postoperative pain control using a conductive catheter, the EpiStim®.

Ultrasound-guided Continuous Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Using a Nerve Stimulating Catheter: EpiStim(R) Catheter

Brachial plexus block (BPB) under ultrasound guidance has come to be widely used. However, nerve injury has been reported following ultrasound-guided BPB. We hypothesized that BPB under ultrasound guidance in conjunction with real-time electrical nerve stimulation would help us prevent nerve injury and do more successful procedure. Here, we report the successful induction and maintenance of ultrasound-guided BPB and the achievement of good peri- and postoperative pain control using a conductive catheter, the EpiStim(R).

Dexamathasone added to levobupivacaine improves postoperative analgesia in ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus blockade for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of 5 mg dexamethasone to 10 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine on postoperative analgesic effects of ultrasound guided-interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) in arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia. METHODS: In 60 patients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery that underwent general anesthesia, ISBPB was preoperatively performed with 10 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine under the guidance of ultrasound and a nerve stimulator. Patients were randomly allocated to receive the same volume of normal saline (Group I), 5 mg of dexamethasone (Group II), or 1 : 400,000 epinephrine (Group III) as an adjuvant to the mixture. A blind observer recorded total analgesic consumption, sleep quality, complication, and patient satisfaction using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) at 0, 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 h after the operation. RESULTS: All patients had successful ISBPB and excellent analgesic effects less than VNRS 4 up to discharge time. VNRS in Group II at 12 h and 48 h was statistically much lower than in Group I and III. There were no differences in total analgesic consumption, sleep quality, complications, and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the addition of 5 mg of dexamethasone to 10 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine in ISBPB showed improvement of postoperative analgesia for arthroscopic shoulder operation without any specific complications.

Dexamathasone added to levobupivacaine improves postoperative analgesia in ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus blockade for arthroscopic shoulder surgery / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of 5 mg dexamethasone to 10 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine on postoperative analgesic effects of ultrasound guided-interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) in arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia. METHODS: In 60 patients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery that underwent general anesthesia, ISBPB was preoperatively performed with 10 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine under the guidance of ultrasound and a nerve stimulator. Patients were randomly allocated to receive the same volume of normal saline (Group I), 5 mg of dexamethasone (Group II), or 1 : 400,000 epinephrine (Group III) as an adjuvant to the mixture. A blind observer recorded total analgesic consumption, sleep quality, complication, and patient satisfaction using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) at 0, 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 h after the operation. RESULTS: All patients had successful ISBPB and excellent analgesic effects less than VNRS 4 up to discharge time. VNRS in Group II at 12 h and 48 h was statistically much lower than in Group I and III. There were no differences in total analgesic consumption, sleep quality, complications, and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the addition of 5 mg of dexamethasone to 10 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine in ISBPB showed improvement of postoperative analgesia for arthroscopic shoulder operation without any specific complications.