Validity of an expert-based job exposure matrix of hand-wrist physical exposures and their prospective associations with carpal tunnel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies of occupational risk factors for rare disorders require large study populations with adequate exposure estimates. Job exposure matrices (JEMs) linked to national information on standardized job titles may enable such large studies. We aimed to establish and validate a JEM for occupational hand-wrist exposures that could be linked to Danish national register data on job titles and hand-wrist disorders. METHODS: We developed a JEM for hand-wrist repetition, force, vibration, and computer work in 96 job groups covering 91% of the 2227 occupational titles in the Danish version of the International Standard Classification of Occupation-88, and examined inter-rater reliability of five expert ratings. Poisson regression models were used to estimate incidence rate ratios for the association of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with the level of repetitive movements, force, vibration, and hours of computer work described by the JEM, adjusted for relevant confounders. RESULTS: The JEM based on expert ratings had fair to good interrater reliability. The incidence of CTS increased with increasing levels of force, hand-wrist repetition, and vibration, Exposure-response patterns for repetition and vibration became less consistent after adjustment for force. The interaction between repetition and force was complex and did not support an overall positive interaction. Computer work was negatively associated with incident CTS. CONCLUSION: The JEM was able to identify known risk factors for CTS consistent with current evidence, and provided further associations on exposure-response patterns, mutual exposure adjustment, and interaction effects between repetition and force. The reliability of expert assessments of hand-wrist physical exposures was fair to good.

Carpal tunnel syndrome related to rheumatic disease (Review).

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most commonly occurring type of entrapment neuropathy in the world. Several conditions may contribute to the development of CTS, such as obesity, repetitive wrist movements, pregnancy, genetic predisposition and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) inflammation. CTS is characterized by a wide range of pathophysiological factors, including increased pressure, mechanical trauma and ischemic damage to the median nerve that runs through the wrist tunnel. In the present narrative literature review, the way rheumatic diseases (RDs) contribute to CTS occurrence is investigated. The epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical and pathogenesis aspects of the relationship are examined. CTS is the most common neurological finding in RA, and incidences of RA, psoriatic arthritis and CTS are closely related. The association of CTS with systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's syndrome, Behcet's disease and systemic sclerosis is weaker. In these cases, the prevalence of CTS is similar to that in the general population. As the occurrence of CTS is increasing, understanding the common mechanism and making an early diagnosis are required to limit pain and costs. When patients with RD present with symptoms such as wrist pain, tingling sensations or numbness in their fingers, CTS should be suspected. This suspicion should not be interpreted in terms of RD. To accurately evaluate patients with RD, a detailed electrophysiological examination should be included in the evaluation process. A diagnostic algorithm should include neuromuscular ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging for patients with RD.

Potential misinformation in websites on carpal tunnel syndrome.

Objective: We sought to evaluate the potential reinforcement of misconceptions in websites discussing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: After removing all cookies to limit personalization, we entered "carpal tunnel syndrome" into five search engines and collected the first 50 results displayed for each search. For each of the 105 unique websites, we recorded publication date, author background, and number of views. The prevalence of potential reinforcement and/or reorientation of misconceptions for each website was then scored using a rubric based on our interpretation of the best current evidence regarding CTS. The informational quality of websites was graded with the DISCERN instrument, a validated tool for assessing online health information. Results: Every website contained at least one potentially misleading statement in our opinion. The most common misconceptions reference "excessive motion" and "inflammation." Greater potential reinforcement of misinformation about CTS was associated with fewer page views and lower informational quality scores. Conclusions: Keeping in mind that this analysis is based on our interpretation of current best evidence, potential misinformation on websites addressing CTS is common and has the potential to increase symptom intensity and magnitude of incapability via reinforcement of unhelpful thoughts regarding symptoms. Innovation: The prevalence of patient-directed health information that can increase discomfort and incapability by reinforcing common unhelpful thoughts supports the need for innovations in how we develop, oversee, and evolve healthy online material.

Early Diagnosis of Amyloidosis and Cardiac Involvement through Carpal Tunnel Surgery and Predictive Factors.

Background/Objectives: To determine the prevalence of amyloidosis through the analysis of synovial tissue and transverse carpal ligament (TCL) in patients undergoing surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), detect predictive factors for the presence of amyloid, and assess cardiac involvement degree. Methods: A prospective study with longitudinal cohort follow-up at a teaching hospital. Patients undergoing CTS surgery from 1 January 2019 to 31 May 2021 were included. Samples from synovial and TCL tissues were examined for amyloid presence. Multivariate analysis was used to detect predictive factors of the presence of amyloid. Patients with amyloid underwent echocardiography, laboratory analyses, and scintigraphy. Results: Two hundred and forty-six patients were included. The prevalence of amyloid was 11.4% in TCL and 12.6% in synovial tissues. Age (p = 0.035; OR 1.123), bilateral CTS symptoms (p = 0.022; OR 3.647), and trigger finger (p < 0.001; OR 3.537) were predictors of the presence of amyloid. Seventeen patients were diagnosed with transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) located in the carpus (no scintigraphic cardiac uptake or grade 0), one with light chain amyloidosis, eight with ATTR with cardiac involvement (grades 2-3), and five with ATTR in the carpus and scintigraphic uptake grade 1 (with normal echocardiogram and blood and urine tests). Conclusions: We detected amyloid in 12.6% of unselected consecutive patients who underwent CTS surgery. Biopsy in patients with CTS for amyloid detection, especially in elderly patients with bilateral symptoms and trigger finger, may be useful for the early diagnosis of amyloidosis, primarily due to transthyretin.

Morphometric indices and carpal tunnel syndrome: a radiological study in female patients.

INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy syndrome of the upper extremities. The carpal tunnel is an osteofibrous canal that is medially bordered by hamulus ossis hamati and pisiform bone, and laterally by scaphoid and trapezoid bones. In this retrospective case-control study, we investigated the relationship between radiologically measured morphometric indices and CTS in female patients. METHODS: Clinical, radiological, and demographic data were collected for 55 hands of 40 female patients diagnosed with CTS and 58 hands of control subjects. Radiological measurements included various morphometric parameters derived from wrist and hand X-rays. Statistical analysis was conducted to assess associations between morphometric indices and CTS. RESULTS: Significant associations were observed between CTS and several morphometric indices, including carpal height, capitate length, palm length, and others. Notably, these values were lower in CTS patients, suggesting a potential link between reduced carpal tunnel volume and increased pressure due to synovial hypertrophy. Additionally, a newly introduced index, Scaphoid Pisiform Width Index (SPWI), showed promise in assessing the proximal part of the carpal tunnel. CONCLUSION: It was found that the values for Capitate length, Carpal height, Palm length, SPWI, and Palmar ratio were lower in the patient group. These results suggested that decreasing volume of the carpal tunnel allows for an easier increase in carpal tunnel pressure due to increased synovial hypertrophy and the carpal bone configuration affects the proximal part of the carpal tunnel, and influences the compression of the median nerve, in female patients.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome as an Atypical Presentation of Chikungunya: A Case Report.

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is an arbovirus endemic to tropical and subtropical regions, primarily known for causing fever and severe joint pain. However, its capacity to induce neurological complications is less frequently documented. This case report highlights a rare presentation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) following CHIKV infection, expanding the spectrum of CHIKV manifestations beyond its common arthropathic effects. We detail the case of a 45-year-old male who developed acute CTS symptoms, including pain, numbness, and motor dysfunction in the right thumb, six weeks after experiencing typical CHIKV symptoms of high-grade fever and arthralgia. Despite an initial treatment regimen of corticosteroids aimed at reducing inflammation, the patient's symptoms showed minimal improvement, prompting surgical intervention. Following carpal tunnel release surgery, the patient experienced significant relief and functional recovery. This case underscores the importance of considering CHIKV in the differential diagnosis of CTS in endemic areas, particularly when preceded by typical viral infection symptoms. It also supports surgical intervention as a viable treatment option for CTS associated with CHIKV when conservative management is ineffective, highlighting the need for an interdisciplinary approach in treating atypical manifestations of CHIKV infections.

Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a condition that causes discomfort due to the compression of the median nerve in the wrist. Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a surgical procedure that can help alleviate the symptoms of CTS. Two methods are commonly used for CTR: endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). The choice of method can impact surgical outcomes and potential complications. This review aims to compare the outcomes of both methods for individuals diagnosed with CTS. This systematic review analyzes the outcomes and potential complications of ECTR and OCTR for CTS. The study encompassed a comprehensive analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses comparing both methods. We searched for studies released between January 2012 and October 2023 on PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The researchers assessed the quality of studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) tool. The study's scope included a range of outcomes and complications, such as symptom relief, functional recovery, grip strength, return to work, patient satisfaction, scar sensitivity, pillar pain, wound complications, nerve-related issues, morphological changes, and recurrence. The review analyzed 11 studies, including seven RCTs and four meta-analyses. These studies evaluated 4367 ECTR and 4107 cases of OCTR. The patients' ages ranged from 46 to 58, and the follow-up periods ranged from three to 24 months. The findings reveal that ECTR has comparable or better outcomes than OCTR, particularly in postoperative discomfort, functional recovery, grip strength, resumption of work, and patient satisfaction. Additionally, ECTR has lower levels of scar sensitivity, pillar pain, and wound-related complications than OCTR. However, ECTR carries a higher risk of reversible nerve injury. There were no substantial differences between the two techniques regarding other potential complications. Both ECTR and OCTR are safe and effective interventions for CTS. ECTR has benefits like faster recovery and improved cosmetic outcomes but requires higher technical proficiency and carries the risk of nerve injury. The choice of technique should consider patient preference, cost-effectiveness, and surgeon expertise.

Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release With Monitored Anesthesia Care Versus Local Anesthesia: Analysis of Operative Times and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Purpose: Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common peripheral nerve compressive neuropathy in clinical practice. Patients who fail nonsurgical management are indicated for carpal tunnel release (CTR), which can be performed open or endoscopically. Efforts have been made to utilize local anesthesia instead of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for endoscopic release. This study seeks to compare perioperative surgical times and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic CTR with local anesthesia versus MAC. Methods: This is a 6-year retrospective study of 1,036 patients undergoing isolated endoscopic CTR with MAC (n = 607) versus local (n = 429) anesthesia within an outpatient surgical center. A combination of chi-square and t tests was used to compare the patient characteristics, operative details, and outcomes. Results: The local cohort demonstrated significantly shorter postoperative time to discharge (15.9 ± 9.8 vs 53.8 ± 11.0 minutes; P < .05), total time spent in surgical center (83.2 ± 18.7 vs 129.3 ± 20.7 minutes; P < .05), shorter total operating room time (26.7 ± 4.3 vs 29.0 ± 4.1 minutes; P < .05) and tourniquet time (12.4 ± 2.5 vs 13.1 ± 2.1 minutes; P < .05). Preoperative and postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were similar between the cohorts (P > .05); however, PROMIS pain interference improved to a higher degree between pre- and post-op in the local group (-1.5 vs -0.8; P = .02). Early and late surgical complications were similar between the groups (P > .05). Conclusions: Patients within the MAC cohort demonstrated longer postoperative time to discharge and total time in the surgical center. The MAC cohort had longer operating room and tourniquet time, albeit not clinically significant. Surgical complications and PROMIS scores were similar between the two groups. Our findings suggest that local anesthesia is a safe and effective option for endoscopic CTR and may offer advantages in cost and convenience for patients. Type of study/level of evidence: Retrospective cohort study/therapeutic III.

Use of a remote assessment pathway for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

We undertook a retrospective cohort study of a remote carpal tunnel syndrome assessment pathway created in response to limitations caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Between July 2020 and September 2021, 702 patients referred from primary care (general practice) were assessed in a nurse-led telephone clinic using the carpal tunnel questionnaire of Kamath and Stothard (2003). Depending on their questionnaire score, patients were referred either for nerve conduction studies or a consultant hand surgeon review for diagnosis and treatment planning. Questionnaire scores of 3 and above accurately predicted a likely diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in 83% of patients, and a diagnosis was unlikely in 90% of those with a score below 3. The pathway resulted in an estimated cost savings of £24,436 (€28,862, US$30,945) in comparison with the pre-pandemic service. However, some limitations in the pathway may have impacted effective patient management and we suggest possible improvements.Level of evidence: III.

Implementation of postoperative opioid prescribing guidelines after carpal tunnel release: a quality collaborative study.

Opioid prescribing after carpal tunnel release (CTR) is not well understood. We assessed CTR opioid prescribing within a quality collaborative after the dissemination of guidelines. Post guidelines, the odds of receiving a prescription decreased by 67%. Quality collaboratives can change practice patterns.Level of evidence: III.

The association of bariatric surgery and carpal tunnel syndrome: A propensity score-matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that weight loss following bariatric surgery is associated with a reduced risk of developing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) compared with obese patients who do not undergo bariatric surgery. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using data from the Swedish nationwide healthcare registries. Patients aged 18-79 years who underwent bariatric surgery from 2006 to 2019 were propensity score (PS)-matched to up to 2 obese bariatric surgery-free patients ("unexposed patients"). Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare the incidence of CTS among bariatric surgery patients to obese unexposed patients both overall and divided by subgroups of age, sex, bariatric surgery type, and duration of follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 40,619 bariatric surgery patients were PS-matched to 63,540 obese unexposed patients who did not undergo surgery. Bariatric surgery was not associated overall with CTS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91-1.05). There was a 23% decreased risk of CTS incidence observed within >1-3 years after bariatric surgery (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.88). Decreased CTS risks were observed among bariatric surgery patients aged 18-34 years (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.74-1.01) and those who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63-1.03), but these risks did not reach significance level compared with obese unexposed patients. However, there was a 20% increased CTS risk after 6 years (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05-1.36). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that marked weight does not have a lasting impact on the reduction of CTS incidence.

Laser Acupuncture Versus Electroacupuncture for Nonsevere Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Electroacupuncture (EA) is commonly employed for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), whereas laser acupuncture (LA) seems to offer a safer and more convenient alternative. Nevertheless, transitioning from EA to LA requires evidence. This study aims to compare their clinical efficacy and safety. Methods: A randomized single-blind controlled trial was conducted on 76 CTS patients, with 38 patients assigned to receive EA (EA group) and 38 assigned to receive LA (LA group). Acupoints selected for both groups included PC4, PC6, PC7, PC8, LI4, LI10, LI11, HT3, HT7, and LU10. The intervention consisted of 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS) scores, patients' satisfaction, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results: The LA group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in SSS and FSS scores than the EA group, with mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of -4.29 (-5.40 to -3.18) and -0.73 (-1.24 to -0.24), respectively, after 4 weeks of treatment. Complete symptom, functional recovery, and both were also significantly better in the LA group (relative risks [RR] [95% CI]: 14.00 [1.94 to 101.22], 1.58 [1.24 to 2.02], and 14.00 [1.94 to 101.22], respectively). Overall treatment effectiveness and satisfaction levels were notably higher in the LA group. Six patients experienced AEs in the EA group, whereas no AEs were reported in the LA group. Conclusions: In this study, the findings indicate that LA may offer a safer and more effective alternative to EA. Further studies with longer follow-up periods and assessment of electrodiagnostic changes after intervention are needed.

Variation in Interpretation of Provocative Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

PURPOSE: We studied variation in interpretation of specific symptoms during clinical tests for carpal tunnel syndrome to estimate the degree to which surgeons consider pain without paresthesia characteristic of median neuropathy. METHODS: We invited all upper-extremity surgeon members of the Science of Variation Group to complete a scenario-based experiment. Surgeons read 5-10 clinical vignettes of patients with variation in patient demographics and random variation in symptoms and signs as follows: primary symptoms (nighttime numbness and tingling, constant numbness and loss of sensibility, pain with activity), symptoms elicited by a provocative test (Phalen, Durkan, or Tinel) (tingling, pain), and location of symptoms elicited by the provocative test (index and middle fingers, thumb and index fingers, little and ring fingers, entire hand). RESULTS: Patient factors associated with surgeon interpretation of provocative tests as negative included pain rather than paresthesia during the Phalen, Durkan, or Tinel test and location of symptoms in the entire hand rather than the median nerve distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Specialists do not consider pain without paresthesia or a noncharacteristic symptom distribution as characteristic of carpal tunnel syndrome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Awareness that elicitation of pain with Phalen, Durkan, and Tinel tests is regarded by specialists as relatively uncharacteristic of median neuropathy can help limit the potential for both overdiagnosis and overtreatment of median neuropathy as well as underdiagnosis and undertreatment of mental and social health contributions to illness (notable correlates of the intensity and distribution of pain).

An Analysis of Surgeon Experience, Diagnostic Testing, and Treatment Recommendation For Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

PURPOSE: The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be made clinically using the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-6 (CTS-6) criteria. The role of electrodiagnostic studies (EDS) is controversial. We examined differences in the utilization of CTS-6 and EDS based on surgeon experience and practice setting. METHODS: Members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand were emailed an anonymous web-based link to participate. The survey included an assessment of hypothetical CTS scenarios with varying clinical severity. We collected surgeon demographic attributes, years in practice, practice setting, and frequency of CTS-6 and EDS utilization. A comparison was made of years of experience with surgeon-reported utilization of CTS-6 and EDS as well as treatment recommendation. RESULTS: We received 771 responses (25% response rate). Surgeons recommended carpal tunnel release (CTR) for patients without EDS (16%), normal EDS (33%), and abnormal EDS (90%). Fifty-three percent of surgeons with <15 years in practice reported often/always using CTS-6 criteria in their practice compared to 30% and 29% of surgeons with 16-30 years and > 30 years in practice, respectively. Surgeons with 16-30 and >30 years in practice had significantly lower odds of reporting often/almost always using CTS-6 relative to surgeons with 1-15 years in practice (OR 0.35 and 0.31, respectively). A greater proportion of surgeons with 16-30 years (68%) and >30 years (65.5%) in practice responded often/almost always applying EDS compared to surgeons with <15 years (56%) in practice. In addition, surgeons with 16-30 years and >30 years in practice had a higher odds of often/always using EDS (ORs 1.74 and 1.98, respectively) compared to surgeons with 1-15 years in practice (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of CTS-6 and EDS varied based on years in practice. This difference may reflect changing guidelines, the growing evidence regarding clinical assessment tools, and the emergence of other diagnostic modalities. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given the expense and invasiveness of EDS, opportunities to integrate clinical assessment tools readily into the diagnostic algorithm may shift the role of EDS toward selective utilization for complex clinical scenarios rather than for routine use.

Ultrasound-Based Multi-Planar Bilateral Comparisons as a Diagnostic and Treatment-Definition Method for Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Entrapment.

OBJECTIVE: The primary goal was to determine the performance of the cross-section area swelling rate (CSASR) for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes based on the reference standard of electrodiagnosis examination (EDX) in this diagnostic test study. METHODS: First, patients with symptoms like unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS), and radial nerve compression (RNC) underwent EDX and ultrasound examination. Second, patients with positive ultrasound were calculated for the CSASR of diseased nerve. Based on previously established CSASR criteria, each patient was categorized as having or not having peripheral nerve entrapment, and for those meeting diagnostic criteria, non-surgical or surgical treatment was recommended. Then, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy rate (ACC) of ultrasound diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making were calculated based on the reference standard of EDX that had been historically used in the practice. RESULTS: The total sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and ACC of ultrasound diagnosis are respectively 93.4, 85.2, 94.7, 82.1, and 91.3%. Which of therapeutic decision-making by ultrasound are, respectively, 83.3, 52.2, 78.4, 60.0, and 73.2%. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and Youden's index of CSASR diagnostic threshold for CuTS is higher than other ultrasound methods. The CSASR diagnostic threshold for CuTS has a potential diagnostic role, but the current date is still not enough to support the potential diagnostic role for CTS or RNS. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that CSASR for CuTS can be used in isolation for diagnosis. Additional research is needed to confirm the diagnostic role of CSASR. The current results suggest that this ultrasound examination method is not suitable for therapeutic decision-making.

Comparison of the Effect of Out-of-plane and In-plane Injection Approaches on Injection Pain and Functionality in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Undergoing Ultrasound-guided Injection: A Patient- and Assessor-blinded Randomized Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aims were i) to compare the out-of-plane (OP) and in-plane (IP) approaches for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in terms of pain during injection and post injection adverse effects, and ii) to investigate whether these approaches led to any difference in terms of pain/numbness, symptom severity, functionality, and median nerve cross-sectional area and to examine the relationship of these parameters with the pain during injection. DESIGN: Patient/assessor blinded randomized study SETTING: Hospital outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients with mild to moderate CTS. INTERVENTIONS: The participants were randomized into OP and IP (both n = 25) ultrasound-guided injection groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Each patient reported the pain felt during the injection at 1 h thereafter, and also any adverse effects at 4 weeks after injection. Before and 4 weeks after injection, patients used a visual analog scale to indicate pain/numbness; symptom severity and functionality were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire. The cross-sectional area of the median nerve was also obtained. RESULTS: The average pain during injection was 2.64±0.82 in the IP group and 1.96±0.86 in the OP group (p=0.017). Post-injection adverse effects were similar between the two groups (p<0.05). After injection, the percentage change in symptom severity was 49.8±11.8 in the IP group and 40.6±11.5 in the OP group (p=0.008). In the IP group, day pre-injection pain/numbness, night pain/numbness percentage change scores, and symptom severity percentage change scores were moderately correlated with the pain during injection (r=0.439, 0.469, and 0.429, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: IP injection caused greater pain during injection compared to OP injection and led to greater reduction in symptom severity at 1 month after injection. In that group, injection pain was associated with the baseline day pain score, change in night pain score, and change in symptom severity score.

Alternative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome with ultrasound-guided median nerve hydrodissection in the emergency department.

Hydrodissection is becoming increasingly recognized as a treatment for nerve entrapment syndromes in the orthopedic and rehabilitation world. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is the most prevalent nerve entrapment neuropathy, characterized by compression of the median nerve as it passes through the carpal tunnel. Initial management includes NSAIDs and wrist splints, but surgical intervention is often necessary when these measures fail. Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the median nerve is both safe and effective and presents a minimally invasive option when first-line treatments fail to provide adequate symptom relief. This case report demonstrates the potential for an alternative approach to analgesia in the Emergency Department (ED) for patients presenting with pain related to CTS. Here we discuss a case of a 26-year-old female presenting with CTS symptoms and her successful treatment with ultrasound-guided hydrodissection in the ED.

A variant of perilunate dislocation: A case report and literature review.

Perilunate dislocation is a rare carpal dislocation, which are predominantly trans-styloid and trans-scaphoid. This type of fracture dislocation is seen due to axial loading of a hyperextended ulnar-deviated wrist. This can result in the disruption of the scapholunate, lunocapitate, and lunotriquetral ligaments. The lunate may dislocate volar or dorsal to the other carpal bones. Herein, we have reported a case of trans-styloid, trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocation with carpal tunnel syndrome, which has never been reported in the literature. A 38-year-old construction worker presented with a swollen hand and signs of carpal tunnel syndrome. The patient was diagnosed with perilunate fracture dislocation after a through clinical and radiological assessment. The scaphoid had invaginated into the radial styloid and demonstrated a comminuted fracture pattern. Volar lunate displacement was identified, and the patient demonstrated signs of carpal tunnel syndrome, which is not a common presentation. Open reduction with ligament repair was performed to minimize jeopardizing the hand function. Spelt tea cup sign is a diagnostic for perilunate dislocation. Operative exploration and reduction is imperative for failed closed lunate dislocation reduction to minimizes ongoing soft tissue jeopardy. Moreover, carpal tunnel release is indicated in the present of symptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome. To our knowledge, only a few cases of trans-styloid, trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocation with neurological deficit have been reported.

Mechanisms of neurodynamic treatments (MONET): a protocol for a mechanistic, randomised, single-blind controlled trial in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Physiotherapeutic management is the first-line intervention for patients with entrapment neuropathies such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). As part of physiotherapy, neurodynamic interventions are often used to treat people with peripheral nerve involvement, but their mechanisms of action are yet to be fully understood. The MONET (mechanisms of neurodynamic treatment) study aims to investigate the mechanisms of action of neurodynamic exercise intervention on nerve structure, and function. METHODS: This mechanistic, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial will include 78 people with electrodiagnostically confirmed mild or moderate CTS and 30 healthy participants (N = 108). Patients will be randomly assigned into (1) a 6-week progressive home-based neurodynamic exercise intervention (n = 26), (2) a steroid injection (= 26), or (3) advice (n = 26) group. The primary outcome measure is fractional anisotropy of the median nerve at the wrist using advanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging. Secondary outcome measures include neuroimaging markers at the wrist, quantitative sensory testing, electrodiagnostics, and patient reported outcome measures. Exploratory outcomes include neuroimaging markers at the cervical spine, inflammatory and axonal integrity markers in serial blood samples and biopsies of median nerve innervated skin. We will evaluate outcome measures at baseline and at the end of the 6-week intervention period. We will repeat questionnaires at 6-months. Two-way repeated measures ANCOVAs, followed by posthoc testing will be performed to identify differences in outcome measures among groups and over time. DISCUSSION: This study will advance our understanding of the mechanisms of action underpinning neurodynamic exercises, which will ultimately help clinicians to better target these treatments to those patients who may benefit from them. The inclusion of a positive control group (steroid injection) and a negative control group (advice) will strengthen the interpretation of our results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05859412, 20/4/2023.

Comparative Efficacy of 5% Dextrose and Corticosteroid Injections in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of 5% dextrose (D5W) in comparison to corticosteroids for treating carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on November 13, 2023. These were supplemented by manual searches using Google Scholar. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent authors reviewed the literature, resolving any discrepancies through detailed discussions and consultation with a third author. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on primary outcomes (pain assessment) and secondary outcomes (symptom severity and functional status using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, electrophysiologic measures, cross-sectional area, and adverse effects) were extracted independently by the two authors. DATA SYNTHESIS: The analysis included 4 randomized controlled trials and 1 quasi-experimental study, encompassing a total of 212 patients (220 hands) with mild to moderate CTS. RESULTS: Within 3 months, the D5W injections showed a statistically significant improvement in functional status compared to the corticosteroids with a standard mean difference of -0.34 (95% confidence interval (CI), -0.62 to -0.05). D5W was associated with fewer adverse incidents than corticosteroids (risk ratio 0.13; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.51). No difference was observed between the two treatments in other areas. CONCLUSION: For patients with mild to moderate CTS, D5W injections were more effective than corticosteroid injections in improving functional status and demonstrated fewer adverse effects. D5W injections also paralleled corticosteroids in pain reduction, symptom severity, electrodiagnostic measures, and cross-sectional area of nerve, recommending D5W as a preferred treatment for mild to moderate CTS.