Convalescent Plasma as Adjunctive Therapy for Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: The Co-CLARITY Trial.

Background and Objective: Convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) may reduce the risk of disease progression among patients with COVID-19. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CPT in preventing ICU admission among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods: In this open-label randomized controlled trial, we randomly assigned hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 in a 1:1 ratio to receive convalescent plasma as an adjunct to standard of care or standard of care alone. The primary endpoint was ICU admission within first 28 days of enrolment. Primary safety endpoints include rapid deterioration of respiratory or clinical status within four hours of convalescent plasma transfusion and cumulative incidence of serious adverse events during the study period including transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO), severe allergic reactions, and transfusion-related infections. Results: A total of 22 patients were assigned to receive convalescent plasma as an adjunct to standard of care and 22 to receive standard of care alone. The median time from onset of COVID-19 symptoms to study enrolment was eight days (IQR, 4 to 10). Two patients (9.1%) in the CPT group and one patient (4.5%) in the control group were admitted to the ICU. The primary outcome measure, ICU admission, was not different between the two groups (q-value >0.9). No patient who received convalescent plasma had rapid deterioration of respiratory/clinical status within four hours of transfusion and none developed TRALI, TACO, anaphylaxis, severe allergic reactions, or transfusion-related infections. There was also no significant difference in the secondary outcomes of 28-day mortality (two patients in the CPT group and none in the control group, q-value >0.90), dialysis-free days, vasopressor-free days, and ICU-free days. Conclusions: Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, no significant differences were observed in the need for ICU admission between patients given CPT as adjunct to standard of care and those who received standard of care alone. Interpretation is limited by early termination of the trial which may have been underpowered to detect a clinically important difference.

Blood Banking Capacity in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: Covid-19 Convalescent Plasma in Context.

Blood transfusion capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), encompassing both the safety and adequacy of the blood supply, is limited. The challenges facing blood banks in LMICs include regulatory oversight, blood donor selection, collection procedures, laboratory testing, and post-transfusion surveillance. A high proportion of LMICs are unable to fully meet clinical demands for blood products, and many do not meet even the minimum threshold of collection (10 units per 1000 population). Suboptimal clinical transfusion practices, in large part due to a lack of training in transfusion medicine, contribute to blood wastage. During the COVID-19 pandemic, high- and LMICs alike experienced blood shortages, in large part due to quarantine and containment measures that impeded donor mobility. COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was particularly appealing for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 in LMICs, as it is a relatively inexpensive intervention and makes use of the existing blood collection infrastructure. Nonetheless, the challenges of using CCP in LMICs need to be contextualized among broad concerns surrounding blood safety and availability. Specifically, reliance on first time, family replacement and paid donors, coupled with deficient infectious disease testing and quality oversight, increase the risk of transfusion transmitted infections from CCP in LMICs. Furthermore, many LMICs are unable to meet general transfusion needs; therefore, CCP collection also risked exacerbation of pervasive blood shortages.

COVID-19 convalescent plasma therapy decreases inflammatory cytokines: a randomized controlled trial.

IMPORTANCE: This study examined the role that cytokines may have played in the beneficial outcomes found when outpatient individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 were transfused with COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) early in their infection. We found that the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 decreased significantly faster in patients treated early with CCP. Participants with COVID-19 treated with CCP later in the infection did not have the same effect. This decrease in IL-6 levels after early CCP treatment suggests a possible role of inflammation in COVID-19 progression. The evidence of IL-6 involvement brings insight into the possible mechanisms involved in CCP treatment mitigating SARS-CoV-2 severity.

Early antibody treatment, inflammation, and risk of post-COVID conditions.

IMPORTANCE: Approximately 20% of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 experienced long-term health effects, as defined PCC. However, it is unknown if there are any early biomarkers associated with PCC or whether early intervention treatments may decrease the risk of PCC. In a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, this study demonstrates that among outpatients with SARS-CoV-2, increased IL-6 at time of infection is associated with increased odds of PCC. In addition, among individuals treated early, within 5 days of symptom onset, with COVID-19 convalescent plasma, there was a trend for decreased odds of PCC after adjusting for other demographic and clinical characteristics. Future treatment studies should be considered to evaluate the effect of early treatment and anti-IL-6 therapies on PCC development.

Negativización de carga viral en pacientes positivos persistentes SARS-CoV-2 y uso de plasma de convalecientes / Negative viral load in persistent positive SARS-CoV-2 patients and use of convalescent plasma

No existe medicación específica contra el SARS-CoV-2 y el tratamiento consiste fundamentalmente en medidas de soporte. La transfusión de plasma de convalecientes consiste en administrar pasivamente anticuerpos policlonales, que generan una respuesta inmune inmediata y disminuyen la carga viral. El objetivo del estudio fue describir la estadía hospitalaria y negativización de reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real en pacientes positivos persistentes con el uso de plasma de convalecientes. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal, prospectivo, en 8 pacientes positivos persistentes que recibieron dicho plasma, en el Hospital Universitario Clínico Quirúrgico «Cmdte. Manuel Fajardo» de septiembre a noviembre de 2020. El mayor por ciento de casos necesitó una dosis de plasma de convalecientes para negativizar el PCR-TR. La estadía hospitalaria más frecuente fue de 14 a 19 días, el 62,50 % de los pacientes, 24 horas después de administrada la última dosis de este plasma, negativizó el RCP-TR evolutivo.

There is no specific medication against SARS-CoV-2 and the treatment consists mainly of supportive measures. Convalescent plasma transfusion consists of passively administered polyclonal antibodies, which generate an immediate immune response and decrease viral load. The objective of the study was to describe hospital stay and real-time polymerase chain reaction negativization in persistently positive patients with the use of convalescent plasma. A prospective, cross-sectional and descriptive study was carried out in 8 persistently positive patients who received such plasma at "Cmdte. Manuel Fajardo" Clinical and Surgical University Hospital from September to November 2020. The highest percentage of cases required a dose of convalescent plasma to make the RT-PCR negative. The most frequent hospital stay was from 14 to 19 days; 62.50% of the patients had a negative evolutionary RT-PCR, 24 hours after administering the last dose of this plasma.

Neutralización del virus SARS-CoV-2 (linaje B.1.1) por suero hiperinmune de llama (Lama glama) en cultivo de células Vero / Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 (lineage B.1.1) by hyperimmune llama (Lama glama) serum in Vero cell culture

Objetivo. Evaluar la respuesta serológica de anticuerpos de una llama (Lama glama) a la inmunización del virus SARS-CoV-2 (linaje B.1.1) y la capacidad neutralizante del suero de llama hiperinmune frente al virus SARS-CoV-2 (linaje B.1.1) en células Vero. Materiales y métodos. Se inmunizó una llama con el virus SARS-CoV-2 inactivado (Linaje B.1.1) y se analizaron muestras de suero para evaluar el nivel de anticuerpos mediante ELISA, así como la reactividad a antígenos de SARS-CoV-2 mediante Western Blot. Además, se evaluó la neutralización viral en cultivos celulares por la Prueba de Neutralización por Reducción de Placas (PRNT, por sus siglas en inglés). Resultados. Se observó un aumento en la serorreactividad en la llama inmunizada desde la semana 4 en adelante. Los títulos de anticuerpos fueron más elevados en el séptimo refuerzo de inmunización. Los resultados de Western Blot confirmaron los hallazgos positivos del ELISA, y los anticuerpos del suero inmune reconocieron varias proteínas virales. El ensayo de neutralización (PRNT) mostró una neutralización viral visible, concordante con los resultados de ELISA y Western Blot. Conclusiones. Los hallazgos sugieren que el suero hiperinmune de llama podría constituir una fuente de anticuerpos terapéuticos contra las infecciones por el virus SARS-CoV-2 (linaje B.1.1) y que deberá ser evaluado en estudios posteriores.

Objective. To evaluate the serological antibody response of a llama (Lama glama) to SARS-CoV-2 (B.1.1 lineage) immunization and the neutralizing capacity of hyperimmune llama serum against SARS-CoV-2 virus (B.1.1 lineage) in Vero cells. Materials and methods. A llama was immunized with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 (B.1.1 lineage). Serum samples were analyzed to evaluate the level of antibodies by ELISA, as well as reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 antigens by Western Blot. In addition, viral neutralization in cell cultures was assessed by the Plate Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT). Results . Seroreactivity increased in the immunized llama from week 4 onwards. Antibody titers were the highest after the seventh immunization booster. Western blot results confirmed the positive ELISA findings, and immune serum antibodies recognized several viral proteins. The neutralization assay (PRNT) showed visible viral neutralization, which was in accordance with the ELISA and Western Blot results. Conclusions. The findings suggest that hyperimmune llama serum could constitute a source of therapeutic antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infections (lineage B.1.1), and should be studied in further research.

Uso de plasma de convalecientes de COVID-19 en pacientes hospitalizados por SARS-CoV-2 de moderada grave-dad en la Región de Los Ríos, Chile

Introducción: COVID-19 cobró millones de vidas especialmente en la era pre-vacunas. Estudios preliminares mostraban eficacia promisoria del plasma de personas convalecientes anti SARS-CoV-2 (PPC). Objetivo: evaluar la eficacia del PPC en hospitalizados por COVID-19 de moderada gravedad. Material y Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, bicéntrico, en adultos hospitalizados por COVID-19 moderado (no crítico) que requirieron oxigenoterapia. Al plasma donado por sobrevivientes de cuadros leves (600 cc) se les realizó búsqueda de IgG anti SARS-CoV-2. Se evaluó su impacto en mortalidad, estadía hospitalaria (días) y necesidad de ventilación mecánica (VMI). Resultados: De los 119 pacientes incluidos, 58% eran hombres (edad mediana 60 años), 88% poseía comorbilidad y 43% tenía "CALL score" de alto riesgo. 43 pacientes (36%) recibieron PPC, sólo 15 (12,6%) precozmente (< 7 días). 22 pacientes debieron trasladarse a unidad intensiva, 18 recibieron VMI y 15 fallecieron (12,6%). El uso de PPC no se asoció a cambios en la mortalidad (p = 0,16), necesidad de VMI (p = 0,79) ni en la estadía hospitalaria (p = 0,24). Su administración en forma precoz (< 7 días de síntomas) tampoco demostró asociación significativa. La presencia de cardiopatía y el requerir posteriormente VMI fueron factores independientes asociados a mortalidad. Conclusiones: El uso de PPC en pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 de moderada gravedad no se asoció a menor mortalidad, estadía hospitalaria ni necesidad de VMI.

Introduction: COVID-19 claimed millions of lives, mainly in the pre-vaccine era. Preliminary studies showed promising efficacy of convalescent plasma against SARS-CoV-2 (CP). Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of CP in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with moderate severity. Methods: Retrospective, bicentric study including adults hospitalized for moderate (non-critical) COVID-19 who required oxygen therapy. CP donated by survivors of mild cases (600 cc) were searched for IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2. Its impact on mortality, hospital stay (days), and need for mechanical ventilation (IMV) was evaluated. Results: Of the 119 patients included, 58% were men (median age 60 years), 88% had comorbidity, and 43% had a high-risk CALL score. Forty-three patients (36%) received CP, only 15 (12.6%) early (< 7 days). Twenty-two patients had to be transferred to the intensive care unit; 18 received IMV, and 15 died (12.6%). The use of CP was not associated with changes in mortality (p = 0.16), need for IMV (p = 0.79), or hospital stay (p = 0.24). Its early administration (< 7 days of symptoms) did not show a significant association either. The presence of heart disease and subsequently requiring IMV were independent factors of mortality. Conclusions: The use of CP in patients hospitalized for moderately severe COVID-19 was not associated with lower mortality, hospital stay, or the need for IMV.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Convalescent Plasma Utilization in the United States: Data From the National Inpatient Sample.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) use between October and December 2020 was characterized using the National Inpatient Sample database. CCP was administered in 18.0% of COVID-19-associated hospitalizations and was strongly associated with older age and increased disease severity. There were disparities in the receipt of CCP by race and ethnicity, geography, and insurance.

Symptom Duration and Resolution With Early Outpatient Treatment of Convalescent Plasma for Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) reduces hospitalizations among outpatients treated early after symptom onset. It is unknown whether CCP reduces time to symptom resolution among outpatients. METHODS: We evaluated symptom resolution at day 14 by trial arm using an adjusted subdistribution hazard model, with hospitalization as a competing risk. We also assessed the prevalence of symptom clusters at day 14 between treatments. Clusters were defined based on biologic clustering, impact on ability to work, and an algorithm. RESULTS: Among 1070 outpatients followed up after transfusion, 381 of 538 (70.8%) receiving CCP and 381 of 532 (71.6%) receiving control plasma were still symptomatic (P = .78) at day 14. Associations between CCP and symptom resolution by day 14 did not differ significantly from those in controls after adjustment for baseline characteristics (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.99; P = .62). The most common cluster consisted of cough, fatigue, shortness of breath, and headache and was found in 308 (57.2%) and 325 (61.1%) of CCP and control plasma recipients, respectively (P = .16). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial of outpatients with early COVID-19, CCP was not associated with faster resolution of symptoms compared with control. Overall, there were no differences by treatment in the prevalence of each symptom or symptom clusters at day 14. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04373460.

Early Treatment, Inflammation and Post-COVID Conditions.

Background: Post-COVID conditions (PCC) are common and have significant morbidity. Risk factors for PCC include advancing age, female sex, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Little is known about early treatment, inflammation, and PCC. Methods: Among 883 individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection participating in a randomized trial of CCP vs. control plasma with available biospecimens and symptom data, the association between early COVID treatment, cytokine levels and PCC was evaluated. Cytokine and chemokine levels were assessed at baseline, day 14 and day 90 using a multiplexed sandwich immuosassay (Mesoscale Discovery). Presence of any self-reported PCC symptoms was assessed at day 90. Associations between COVID treatment, cytokine levels and PCC were examined using multivariate logistic regression models. Results: One-third of the 882 participants had day 90 PCC symptoms, with fatigue (14.5%) and loss of smell (14.5%) being most common. Cytokine levels decreased from baseline to day 90. In a multivariable analysis including diabetes, body mass index, race, and vaccine status, female sex (adjusted odds ratio[AOR]=2.70[1.93-3.81]), older age (AOR=1.32[1.17-1.50]), and elevated baseline levels of IL-6 (AOR=1.59[1.02-2.47]) were associated with development of PCC.There was a trend for decreased PCC in those with early CCP treatment (≤5 days after symptom onset) compared to late CCP treatment. Conclusion: Increased IL-6 levels were associated with the development of PCC and there was a trend for decreased PCC with early CCP treatment in this predominately unvaccinated population. Future treatment studies should evaluate the effect of early treatment and anti-IL-6 therapies on PCC development.

Convalescent plasma therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 in ambulatory versus hospitalized patients: Efficacy and risk of thromboembolism.

Background: Although early evidence concluded a lack of clinical benefit of convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) in COVID-19 management, recent trials have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of CPT in ambulatory care. CPT may also potentiate thromboembolic events, given the presence of coagulation factors and the prothrombotic state of COVID-19. Objectives: The present study aimed to assess and compare the clinical efficacy and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE)/arterial thromboembolism (ATE) of CPT in ambulatory versus hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from December 2019 to December 2022 for randomized controlled trials that investigated the use of CPT against placebo or standard of care in adult patients with COVID-19. The primary outcome was nonmortality disease progression. Secondary outcomes include VTE, ATE, 28-day mortality, clinical improvement, length of hospitalization, sepsis/fever, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Results: Twenty randomized controlled trials, with 21,340 patients, were included. CPT significantly reduced nonmortality disease progression in ambulatory patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92; P = .009) but not in hospitalized patients (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94-1.12; P = .58). The risk of VTE and ATE did not differ between the CPT and the control group (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.82-1.66; P = .40; and OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.37-2.79; P = .98, respectively). No conclusive differences between CPT and control groups were noted in 28-day mortality, clinical improvement, length of hospitalization, risk of sepsis/fever, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Conclusion: In conclusion, treatment of COVID-19 with CPT prevents the progression of COVID-19 in the ambulatory care. It is not associated with an increased risk of VTE, ATE, or other adverse events.

Convalescent plasma in hospitalized pediatric and obstetric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

BACKGROUND: Published data on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) use in children and obstetric patients are limited. We describe a single-center experience of hospitalized patients who received CCP for acute COVID-19. METHODS: A retrospective review of children 0-18-years-old and pregnant patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed acute COVID-19 who received CCP from March 1, 2020 to March 1, 2021 was performed. Clinical and laboratory data were collected to assess the safety of CCP administration. Antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were measured in the CCP products and in patients before transfusion and at various time points post-transfusion. Correlation between the administered SARS-CoV-2 administered versus the SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike immunoglobulin response in patient serum was assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-two children and ten obstetric patients were eligible. Twelve pediatric and eight obstetric patients had moderate disease and ten pediatric and two obstetric patients had severe disease. Five pediatric patients died. Eighteen of 37 (48.6%) CCP titers that were measured met US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria for high immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody titer. There were no complications with transfusion. High-titer CCP showed a positive correlation with rise in patient total immunoglobulin levels only in obstetric patients but not in pediatric patients. Among pediatric patients, the median serum antibody level increased over time after transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Coronavirus 2019 convalescent plasma was administered safely to our patients. Our study suggested that CCP did not interfere with endogenous antibody production. The antibody titer of CCP correlated with post-transfusion response only in obstetric patients. Randomized trials in pediatric and obstetric patients are needed to further understand how to dose CCP and evaluate efficacy.

The Quality of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 T Cell Responses Predicts the Neutralizing Antibody Titer in Convalescent Plasma Donors.

Convalescent plasma therapy has been described as an attractive approach to treat critically ill patients with COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019). The selection of convalescent plasma donors (CPD) is commonly based on neutralizing antibody titer. A better understanding of the quality of immune responses following COVID-19 will enable the optimization of convalescent donors' selection in convalescent plasma programs. The involvement of SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells in the induction and persistence of high affinity anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody is still poorly investigated. In this study, 115 CPD who presented SARS-CoV-2 and who were eligible for plasma donation were included. Comprehensive analysis of T cells together with humoral responses were performed in regards of sex, age and blood group type. High frequency of T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 related protein such as spike glycoprotein (80.0%), nucleocapsid (NCAP) (70.4%) and membrane protein (VME1) (74.8%) were detected in CPD by ex vivo IFN-γ and TNF-α ELISpot assays. Among CPD responders, most exhibited poly-specific T cell responses (75%) defined by the ability to mount responses against at least two SARS-CoV-2 antigens. We found a positive correlation between the magnitude and the poly-specificity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses in CPD. Notably, both the magnitude and poly-specificity of SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses were highly correlated with neutralizing antibody titer in CPD. The present study highlights that the poly-specificity and strength of SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell responses predicts neutralizing antibody titer following COVID-19. These observations show the interest to combine T cell assays and antibody titer for the selection of CPD and to a latter extend to assess COVID-19 vaccine efficacy in at-risk patients.

How do I implement an outpatient program for the administration of convalescent plasma for COVID-19?

Convalescent plasma, collected from donors who have recovered from a pathogen of interest, has been used to treat infectious diseases, particularly in times of outbreak, when alternative therapies were unavailable. The COVID-19 pandemic revived interest in the use of convalescent plasma. Large observational studies and clinical trials that were executed during the pandemic provided insight into how to use convalescent plasma, whereby high levels of antibodies against the pathogen of interest and administration early within the time course of the disease are critical for optimal therapeutic effect. Several studies have shown outpatient administration of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) to be both safe and effective, preventing clinical progression in patients when administered within the first week of COVID-19. The United States Food and Drug Administration expanded its emergency use authorization (EUA) to allow for the administration of CCP in an outpatient setting in December 2021, at least for immunocompromised patients or those on immunosuppressive therapy. Outpatient transfusion of CCP and infusion of monoclonal antibody therapies for a highly transmissible infectious disease introduces nuanced challenges related to infection prevention. Drawing on our experiences with the clinical and research use of CCP, we describe the logistical considerations and workflow spanning procurement of qualified products, infrastructure, staffing, transfusion, and associated management of adverse events. The purpose of this description is to facilitate the efforts of others intent on establishing outpatient transfusion programs for CCP and other antibody-based therapies.

Retrospective analysis on efficacy of convalescent plasma in acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an ongoing global health threat. However, currently, no standard therapy has been approved for the disease. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of convalescent plasma (CP) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study conducted at Kayseri City Education and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey. METHODS: The case group consisted of adult patients (> 18 years) with ARDS due to COVID-19 who received CP in combination with antiviral and supportive treatment. These patients were compared with others who only received antiviral and supportive treatment. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 30 patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 were included. Eleven patients (36%) received CP in combination with antiviral and supportive treatment, whereas nineteen patients (64%) in the control group only received antiviral and supportive treatment. On admission, the median age, demographic and clinical data and initial laboratory test results were similar between the groups (P > 0.05). On the 14th day of treatment, the laboratory values remained similar between the groups (P > 0.05). The mortality rates were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: CP treatment did not affect mortality or lead to clinical improvement for COVID-19 patients with ARDS.

The demographic and serological characteristics of COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors: Identification of basic criteria for optimal donor selection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Convalescent plasma has attracted significant attention as a therapeutic option against infectious agents for more than a century. In March 2020, the use of Convalescent COVID-19 plasma (CCP) as a new research drug for COVID-19 treatment was approved by the FDA. The development of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies following infection or vaccination is likely to be essential to provide adequate immunity for the population to halt the COVID19 pandemic. This study aimed to identify the criteria that would be used to determine the most appropriate CCP donors with the highest effective antiviral antibody titers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort, univariate analyses and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between characteristics of 11949 CCP donors and COVID-19 disease severity prior to donation with antibody titers estimated using ELISA technique and rapid tests. RESULTS: The antibody titer was measured among 8206 (68.7 %) donors. Elderly male and nulliparous female CCP donors who resided in the areas with high load of virus had positive ELISA and rapid test results as well as high levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies titer. Moreover, the long hospital stay and elderly donors were the variables associated with high levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that nulliparous female and male donors with positive rapid tests who resided in areas with a higher prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, with more than 40 years of age and long hospitalization time can be the preferred donors for CCP donation.

Early high-titer convalescent plasma therapy in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) has been approved by the FDA. We assessed the outcome of patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 following convalescent plasma therapy and the association with variables such as antibody titer in CCP units and transfusion time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 3097 patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 (according to WHO Progression Scale) had heterogeneous demographic and clinical characteristics received plasma with an unknown titer at the transfusion time. Firstly, information about age, sex, blood group, the time interval from hospitalization to CCP transfusion, underlying disease, and antibody titer with the outcome were investigated. Then, multivariate logistic regression and area under the curve (AUC) were performed for the association between disease severity and intubation variables with transfusion time and outcome. RESULTS: Patients with younger age receiving CCP in the first five days of hospitalization had lower mortality (P < 0.0001). Moreover, patients without the underlying disease had lower mortality (P < 0.001). The mortality rate also decreased in severe patients who were intubated receiving CCP for less than five days (P < 0.001). In patients with moderate severity (score less than 5) who received IgG antibody levels above 1:320 in less than five days had lower mortality (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggested that COVID-19 patients with the moderate type of disease receiving CCP units with high antibody titers in the early stages of the disease experienced greater effectiveness of CCP therapy.

Harnessing immunotherapy to combat COVID-19: A modern snake oil or silver bullet?

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), has emerged into a global health and economic menace. Amidst the COVID-19 turmoil, recent failures/uncertain outcomes in clinical trials involving the anti-malarial (hydroxychloroquine), anti-viral (remdesivir) or the combination of anti-malarial/antibiotic (hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin) regimens have predisposed the physicians to distrust these "highly-touted" drugs for COVID-19. In this milieu, immunotherapy might be a credible modality to target or modify specific/non-specific immune responses that interfere with the survival of intracellular pathogens. This scientific review throws light on the epidemiology of COVID-19, its pathogenesis and the current clinical scenario of immunotherapeutics including convalescent plasma (CP), type-1 interferons (IFN-I) and human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to combat COVID-19. The treatment outcomes underscore that immunotherapy might be a reliable tool to assuage COVID-19-associated immunopathology. However, specific patient pool studies are warranted to ascertain the precise (re)purposing of immunotherapeutics for COVID-19.

Guidance for the procurement of COVID-19 convalescent plasma: differences between high- and low-middle-income countries.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) has been used, predominantly in high-income countries (HICs) to treat COVID-19; available data suggest the safety and efficacy of use. We sought to develop guidance for procurement and use of CCP, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) for which data are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary, geographically representative group of individuals with expertise spanning transfusion medicine, infectious diseases and haematology was tasked with the development of a guidance document for CCP, drawing on expert opinion, survey of group members and review of available evidence. Three subgroups (i.e. donor, product and patient) were established based on self-identified expertise and interest. Here, the donor and product-related challenges are summarized and contrasted between HICs and LMICs with a view to guide related practices. RESULTS: The challenges to advance CCP therapy are different between HICs and LMICs. Early challenges in HICs related to recruitment and qualification of sufficient donors to meet the growing demand. Antibody testing also posed a specific obstacle given lack of standardization, variable performance of the assays in use and uncertain interpretation of results. In LMICs, an extant transfusion deficit, suboptimal models of donor recruitment (e.g. reliance on replacement and paid donors), limited laboratory capacity for pre-donation qualification and operational considerations could impede wide adoption. CONCLUSION: There has been wide-scale adoption of CCP in many HICs, which could increase if clinical trials show efficacy of use. By contrast, LMICs, having received little attention, require locally applicable strategies for adoption of CCP.

Promoting access to COVID-19 convalescent plasma in low- and middle-income countries.

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain neglected in the Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) (i.e. plasma collected from individuals after their recovery from COVID-19) has emerged as a leading medical treatment for COVID-19. Studies to date support the safety-and increasingly the efficacy-of CCP to treat COVID-19. This has motivated large-scale procurement and transfusion of CCP, notably in the United States (US), where inventories of CCP have been attained, and government-supported stockpiling of CCP is underway. CCP is a therapy that could be implemented in LMICs. However, systemic and transfusion-specific challenges (e.g. capacity for donor mobilization and collections) impede local procurement of this resource in sufficient volumes to meet clinical demand. This raises the question as to whether there are strategies to facilitate sharing of CCP with LMICs and/or bolstering local capacity for collection to contend with the health crisis. While compelling, there are cost-related, logistical and regulatory barriers to both approaches. For one, there is complexity in diverting national interest (e.g. in the US) away from an epidemic that displays few signs of abating. There are also concerns regarding equitable distribution of CCP in LMICs and how that might be overcome. Further, the barriers to blood donation in general apply to collection of CCP; these obstacles are longstanding, accounting for the inability of many LMICs to meet their blood transfusion needs. Nonetheless, CCP affords dual opportunity for humanitarian outreach while tackling a broader challenge of blood transfusion safety and availability.