Enseñanza de las maniobras de soporte vital básico en alumnos de un ciclo formativo, ¿se mantiene la calidad de las maniobras en el tiempo? / Teaching basic life support maneuvers in students of a training cycle, is the quality of the maneuvers maintained over time?

Objetivo Evaluar la calidad de las maniobras de soporte vital básico tras un proceso formativo normalizado y estudiar su evolución a corto plazo. Materiales y métodos Estudio experimental con alumnos de los ciclos formativos de Técnico Superior en Acondicionamiento Físico y Técnico Superior en Enseñanza y Animación Sociodeportiva del Colegio de la Trinidad de Córdoba. Se realiza una evaluación inicial, una evaluación 15 días tras la formación y otra a los 30 días, que constan de una evaluación mediante un test teórico y una evaluación práctica de 2min de RCP. Para el desarrollo de las evaluaciones prácticas, se utiliza el simulador Resusci Anne® QCPR. Se considera como variable principal el porcentaje global de RCP obtenido mediante SimPad SkillReporter®. Resultados Se estudia una muestra de 45 alumnos, 71,1% varones. Se observan diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre la puntuación teórica total de la evaluación inicial y la de los 15 días (7,81 vs. 6,82 puntos; p<0,0001) y entre la evaluación de los 15 días y la de los 30 días (6,82 vs. 7,66 puntos; p<0,0001), y en el porcentaje global de RCP entre la evaluación inicial y la de los 15 días (27 vs. 49 puntos; p=0,008) y entre la evaluación inicial y la evaluación a los 30 días (27 vs. 6,15 puntos; p<0,0001). Conclusiones La calidad de la maniobra de RCP mejora a corto plazo tras la formación, siendo cercana a los estándares de calidad establecidos por la ERC (AU)

Objective To evaluate the quality of basic life support after a standardized training process and study their short-term evolution. Materials and methods Experimental study with students from the training cycles of Higher Technician in Physical Conditioning and Higher Technician in Teaching and Socio-Sports Animation of the Colegio de la Trinidad from Córdoba. An initial evaluation is carried out, an evaluation of 15 days after training and another 30 days later; consisting of an evaluation by a theoretical test, and a practical evaluation of 2min of CPR. For the development of practical evaluations, we used the Resusci Anne® QCPR simulator. The main outcome variable is the global percentage of CPR obtained using the SimPad SkillReporter®. Results We study 45 students, 71.1% of them male. Statistically significant differences are observed in the total theoretical score of the initial evaluation and the 15 days evaluation (7.81 vs. 6.82 points; P<.0001), and between the 15-day and 30-day evaluation (6.82 vs. 7.66 points; P<.0001); and in the overall percentage of CPR between the initial evaluation and the 15-day evaluation (27 vs. 49 points; P=.008) and between the initial evaluation and the 30 days evaluation (27 vs. 6.15 points; P<.0001). Conclusions The CPR quality improves after training, being close to the quality standards established by the ERC (AU)

[Teaching basic life support maneuvers in students of a training cycle, is the quality of the maneuvers maintained over time?] / Enseñanza de las maniobras de soporte vital básico en alumnos de un ciclo formativo, ¿se mantiene la calidad de las maniobras en el tiempo?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of basic life support after a standardized training process and study their short-term evolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental study with students from the training cycles of Higher Technician in Physical Conditioning and Higher Technician in Teaching and Socio-Sports Animation of the Colegio de la Trinidad from Córdoba. An initial evaluation is carried out, an evaluation of 15 days after training and another 30 days later; consisting of an evaluation by a theoretical test, and a practical evaluation of 2min of CPR. For the development of practical evaluations, we used the Resusci Anne® QCPR simulator. The main outcome variable is the global percentage of CPR obtained using the SimPad SkillReporter®. RESULTS: We study 45 students, 71.1% of them male. Statistically significant differences are observed in the total theoretical score of the initial evaluation and the 15 days evaluation (7.81 vs. 6.82 points; P<.0001), and between the 15-day and 30-day evaluation (6.82 vs. 7.66 points; P<.0001); and in the overall percentage of CPR between the initial evaluation and the 15-day evaluation (27 vs. 49 points; P=.008) and between the initial evaluation and the 30 days evaluation (27 vs. 6.15 points; P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The CPR quality improves after training, being close to the quality standards established by the ERC.