ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Same-session endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an attractive policy for patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) requiring fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and biliary drainage. However, scanty and conflicting data exists regarding safety and efficacy when comparing these two procedures performed in same versus separate sessions. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective, propensity score-matched study including patients with DMBO who underwent EUS-FNB followed by ERCP during the same or separate sessions. The primary outcome was the safety of the procedure [number of patients experiencing adverse events (AEs), overall AEs, its severity, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP)]. Secondary outcomes were successful ERCP, use of advanced cannulation techniques, EUS-FNB adequacy, length of hospital stay, overall procedure time, and time to recurrent biliary obstruction. RESULTS: After propensity matching, 87 patients were allocated to each group. AEs developed in 23 (26.4%) vs. 17 (19.5%) patients in the same and separate sessions group, respectively (p = 0.280). The overall number, the severity of AEs, and the rate of PEP were similar in the two groups. Secondary outcome parameters were also comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Same-session EUS-FNB followed by ERCP with biliary drainage is safe and does not impair technical outcomes of tissue adequacy and biliary cannulation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Accidental intra-arterial administration of a medication can lead to serious iatrogenic harm. Most studies have discussed single cases of accidental intra-arterial administration of a medication, but only a few have described multiple cases occurring in a single, pediatric hospital setting. METHODS: The subjects were pediatric patients with an accidental intra-arterial administration of a medication. After obtaining approval from the institutional review board, the relevant cases were extracted from incident reports submitted to the patient safety office of the study center between November 2016 and April 2023. RESULTS: A review of 18,204 incident reports yielded 10 cases (patient age: 27 days to 13 years) of accidental intra-arterial administration of a medication. The most common site of the cannulation was the dorsum of the foot followed by the dorsum of the hand. The medications administered were narcotics, sedatives, muscle relaxants, antibiotics, and crystalloids. No serious adverse events occurred after injection. In some cases, the accidental arterial cannulation was not discovered immediately (53 min to 26 days). Seven patients had difficult intravenous access; in two of these, ultrasound-guided peripheral venous cannulation was used. CONCLUSIONS: We experienced 10 cases of accidental intra-arterial administration of a medication. The dorsalis pedis artery and the radial artery around the anatomical tobacco socket were common sites of unintentional arterial cannulation. Difficult intravenous (IV) access may be associated with unintentional arterial cannulation. If IV access is difficult or the free IV drip is sluggish, strict vigilance and repeated confirmation are needed to prevent unintentional arterial cannulation.
ABSTRACT
The definitive management of combined aortic arch and descending aortic pathologies such as aneurysms and dissections is either a single or staged operation associated with high morbidity and mortality. Stroke, kidney dysfunction, coagulopathy and high blood transfusion requirements are all affiliated with hypothermic circulatory arrest and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass times. Considering the perilous nature of these operations, the authors describe a step-by-step zone 2 arch replacement as a staged frozen elephant trunk procedure, which provides an adequate landing zone for a later-placed endovascular stent yet maintains a short cardiopulmonary bypass time and no circulatory arrest.
Subject(s)
Aorta, Thoracic , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic , Aortic Dissection , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Humans , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Male , Stents , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Female , Middle AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare the success and complication rates of radial artery catheterization using ultrasound guidance versus the conventional palpation technique in obese patients by anesthesia residents with similar levels of experience in both methods, and to measure the skin-to-artery distance of radial, brachial, and dorsalis pedis arteries using ultrasound with standardized anatomic landmarks. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized controlled trial SETTING: Single tertiary center PARTICIPANTS: Eighty adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound guidance or conventional palpation method MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate of arterial catheterization. The skin-to-artery distance of the radial artery was significantly greater in the BMI groups of 40 to 49 kg/m2 and ≥50 kg/m2 compared to the BMI group of 30 to 39 kg/m2 (mean difference, 1.0 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-1.7; p = 0.0029) for BMI 40-49 kg/m2 vs 30-39 kg/m2 and 1.5 mm (95% CI, 0.6-2.4 mm; p = 0.0015) for ≥50 kg/m2 vs 30-39 kg/m2. Similar findings were observed for the brachial artery. BMI was inversely associated with first-attempt success rates (p = 0.0145) and positively with time to successful catheterization (p = 0.0271). The first-attempt success and vascular complication rates of catheterization did not differ significantly between the ultrasound guidance group (65.0% and 52.5%, respectively) and the conventional palpation group (70.0% [p = 0.6331] and 57.5% [p = 0.6531], respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of this study do not support the routine use of ultrasonography during radial arterial catheterizations for obese adults when junior practitioners perform the procedure.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No research has been conducted to compare long-axis in-plane and short-axis out-of-plane techniques for ultrasound-guided posterior tibial artery cannulation in adults. This study compared these two procedures for cannulating the posterior tibial artery. METHODS: This prospective randomized trial included 236 adult patients undergoing general anesthesia who required arterial cannulation. The posterior tibial artery was cannulated using either the long-axis in-plane technique (group LAIP) or the short-axis out-of-plane method (group SAOP) with an ultrasound machine. First-attempt cannulation success, the number of cannulation attempts required to achieve successful cannulation, ultrasound localization time, cannulation time, and perioperative complications in these two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: The LAIP group demonstrated a significantly higher first-attempt success rate (40.7% vs 18.6%, p < 0.001), shorter ultrasound localization time (36.5 [30, 60] s vs 50 [35, 80] s, p < 0.001), and faster cannulation time (80 [55, 100] s vs 110 [70, 180] s, p < 0.001). LAIP group showed a significantly higher overall success rate (92.4% vs 81.4%, p = 0.012). The median number of cannulation attempts in the LAIP and SAOP groups were 2 [1, 2] and 2 [2, 3], respectively (p < 0.001). Complications were comparable between groups (p = 0.248). CONCLUSIONS: The LAIP group demonstrated higher first-attempt and overall success rates compared to the SAOP group for ultrasound-guided posterior tibial artery (PTA) cannulation in adult patients.
ABSTRACT
Background: The increasing incidence and prevalence of breast malignancies have led to increasing numbers of surgical interventions performed on the axilla and breast, including axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and mastectomy. The risk of postoperative complications, like breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL), can have significant deleterious cosmetic and quality of life effects. National guidelines and cancer councils publish recommendations to avoid skin puncturing procedures, such as venepuncture and intravenous (IV) cannulation, on arms ipsilateral to the surgical site to prevent BCRL occurrence. The initial trials that established a link between BCRL and skin puncture were conducted in the 1950s and 1960s; the evolution of surgical management of breast cancer has likely led to large decreases in complication rates. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, four databases were systematically searched for relevant articles. Eleven relevant articles were identified for inclusion in the final analysis. Updated Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists & Faculty of Pain Medicine (ANZCA) guidelines were included in the analysis following their publication after the initial search had been completed. Results: The overall quality and quantity of evidence in this field is sufficient to conclude that skin puncturing procedures on ipsilateral arms should not be avoided in patients with previous breast or axillary surgery. The highest-quality and most recent available evidence does not support an association between BCRL and skin puncturing procedures. Policies and practices that advocate avoiding skin puncture procedures to prevent BCRL may lead to delays in clinical care. The 2023 ANZCA guidelines recommend against avoiding affected arms for peripheral access and suggest the removal of institutional policies preventing this practice. Conclusions: In patients that have undergone breast surgery or axillary procedures, venous access procedures can be safely performed on the ipsilateral arm. The evidence does not support overarching restrictions on using the ipsilateral arm without pre-existing lymphoedema.
ABSTRACT
An increasing number of patients have required cardiac reoperations in recent decades, and this trend is expected to continue. Hence, re-sternotomy is and will be a common practice in high-volume centres. Re-sternotomy in complex aortic reinterventions carries a high risk of injuring major vascular and heart structures. To avoid catastrophic injuries, preoperative planning and case individualization are essential to minimize complications. Designing a safe and tailored strategy for each patient is believed to have an impact on postoperative outcomes. The arterial cannulation site, the need for hypothermia, left ventricle decompression and the use of an aortic occlusion balloon catheter are some of the preoperative decisions that must be made on a case-by-case basis to ensure adequate brain and visceral perfusion and to minimize major bleeding and circulatory interruption in case of re-entry injury.
Subject(s)
Reoperation , Sternotomy , Humans , Sternotomy/methods , Reoperation/methods , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Male , Female , Aged , Aorta/surgeryABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the effects of the multiple single cannulation technique (MUST) on the outcomes of arteriovenous graft (AVG). Methods: A retrospective study of AVG created between January 2018 and December 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University was conducted. The clinical data of patients and their follow-up data for venous access were analyzed. Subjects were divided into the MUST group or the non-MUST group according to whether MUST was used. The cumulative patency rate and complication incidence were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression was applied to analyze the influencing factors of applying MUST in AVG. Results: The MUST group included 115 AVG and the non-MUST group, 122 AVG. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 4-year cumulative patency rates of the MUST group were 100%, 99.1%, 95.2%, 85.4%, and 73.2%, respectively, while those for the non-MUST group were 97.5%, 92.7%, 77.7%, 69.7%, and 50.0%, respectively, with the 2-year and 3-year patency rates showing significant difference (P=0.022, P=0.004). The standard intervention rate expressed in (median [interquartile range]) in the MUST group was significantly lower than that in the non-MUST group (0.46 [0.00, 0.94] vs. 0.97 [0.60, 1.59], Z=-5.808, P<0.001). A total of 24 (20.9%) AVG in the MUST group and 60 (49.2%) AVG in the non-MUST group had a standard intervention rate >1.0 per patient-year, with significant difference between the two groups. Three (2.6%) AVG in the MUST group and 7 (5.7%) AVG in the non-MUST group were complicated by aneurysm (χ 2=20.737, P<0.001). One (0.9%) AVG in the MUST group and 6 (4.9%) AVG in the non-MUST group had graft infection, with the difference between the groups showing no significance (P=0.121). Multivariate logistic regression showed that dialysis in the alliance facilities (odds ratio [OR]=2.713, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.698-4.336, P<0.001], and excellent follow-up [OR=2.189, 95% CI: 1.221-3.927, P=0.009] were the influencing factors of applying MUST in AVG. Conclusion: MUST improves the cumulative patency of AVG and decreases the intervention frequency and the incidence of aneurysm without increasing the risk of graft infection.
Subject(s)
Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical , Catheterization , Renal Dialysis , Vascular Patency , Humans , Renal Dialysis/methods , Retrospective Studies , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical/methods , Catheterization/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Surgical repair of aortic arch hypoplasia in children requires a "dry" surgical field with reliable end-organ protection. Perfusion strategies commonly involve deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) and variations of the continuous perfusion techniques, such as selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP) and full-flow perfusion with double aortic cannulation (DAC). We aimed to evaluate the end-organ protection in the surgery of aortic arch hypoplasia in newborns and infants using DHCA and DAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 66 newborns and infants with aortic arch hypoplasia and biventricular anatomy were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups according to the perfusion strategy - DHCA (n = 33); and DAC (n = 33). Primary endpoint: acute kidney injury (AKI), graded according to the KDIGO score. Secondary endpoints: neurological sequelae (pre- and postoperative MRI), in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The lowest temperature was 32 (28; 34)°Ð¡ in the DAC group and 23 (20; 25)°Ð¡ in the DHCA group. The patients with DAC had lower incidence of AKI (6 patients (18.2%) versus 19 patients (57.6%); p = .017). In the multivariate analysis, the inotropic index at 48 h was identified as a risk factor, increasing the risk of AKI by 4%. The DHCA group was associated with a 3.8-fold increase in the risk of AKI. There was no difference in hospital mortality between the DAC and DHCA groups (1 patient (3%) versus 3 patients (9.1%); p = .61). Neurological sequelae by MRI scan were observed in 18 patients (54.5%) in the DHCA group compared to 5 patients (15.15%) in the DAC group (p = .026). The only risk factor identified in the multivariate analysis for neurological lesions on MRI scan was the DHCA group, which increased the risk by 8.8 times. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical reconstruction of the aortic arch hypoplasia using the method of full-body perfusion reduces the incidence of neurological lesions and renal complications requiring renal replacement therapy compared with the deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in neonates and infants.
ABSTRACT
Background: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery offers numerous advantages that patients and surgeons desire. This surgical platform encompasses cannulation strategies for cardiopulmonary bypass, optimal surgical access points, and high-quality visualization techniques. Traditional peripheral cannulation methods, though convenient, possess inherent limitations and carry the potential for complications such as retrograde dissection, stroke, or neurologic sequelae. Conversely, central cannulation may be ideally suited to circumvent the disadvantages above. Fully video-assisted thoracoscopy cardiac surgery represents a state-of-the-art platform, offering surgeons an unparalleled surgical view. This analysis aimed to delineate the efficacy and safety of transthoracic central cannulation strategies and the surgical platform during fully video-assisted thoracoscopy cardiac surgery. Methods: Between October 2022 and February 2024, we identified a cohort of 85 consecutive patients with cardiopulmonary bypass undergoing fully video-assisted thoracoscopy cardiac surgery at our institutions. The patients' mean age was 41.09 ± 14.01 years, ranging from 18 to 75 years. The mean weight was 64.34 ± 10.59â kg (ranging from 49 to 103â kg). Congenital heart disease repair accounted for the highest proportion, with 43 cases (50.59%). Mitral valve surgery and left atrium Myxoma resections accounted for 29.41%. Specifically, this included 14 mitral valve repairs, five mitral valve replacements, and six left atrium myxoma resections. Aortic valve replacements constitute 20% of all cases. Results: A total of 85 adult patients underwent fully video-assisted thoracoscopy cardiac surgery. The average CPB time was 83.26 ± 28.26â min, while the aortic cross-clamp time averaged 51.87 ± 23.91â min. The total operation time (skin to skin) averaged 173.8 ± 37.08â min. The mean duration of mechanical ventilation was 5.58 ± 3.43â h, ICU stay was 20.04 ± 2.83â h (ranging from 15.5 to 34â h), and postoperative hospital stay was 5.55 ± 0.87 days. No patients required conversion to thoracotomy and unplanned reoperations due to various reasons. There were no in-hospital deaths, strokes, myocardial infarctions, aortic dissections, or renal failure. No patient developed wound soft tissue infection. Conclusions: Fully video-assisted thoracoscopy cardiac surgery utilizing central cannulation strategies is a reliable, cost-effective platform with a low risk of complications and a potential solution for patients facing contraindications for peripheral cannulation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is commonly used as a diagnostic tool to assess endothelial function, and compared with other methods for stimulating radial artery dilation, FMD offers several advantages such as non-invasiveness, ease of execution, minimal equipment requirements, and negligible risk. The study aimed to investigate the effect of FMD in facilitating radial arterial cannulation in the context of intravenous general anesthesia. METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing intravenous general anesthesia and requiring radial artery cannulation were randomized 1:1 to the FMD group and control group. Patients in the FMD group received an upper arm occlusion for 5 min after anesthesia induction, and the cuff was placed without inflation for the equivalent duration in the control group. The primary outcome was first-attempt success rate. Secondary outcomes were the diameter and percentage of dilation of radial artery, overall success rate, total number of attempts, cannulation time, and occurrence of procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Intravenous anesthetic agents significantly dilated the radial artery (p < 0.05), which was further increased by FMD. An increase in both the first-attempt and overall success rate of radial artery cannulation was demonstrated with the use of FMD (67.5% vs 42.5%, p < 0.05). The total number of attempts needed to cannulate the radial artery was reduced in the FMD group as compared with the control group (p < 0.05), but no differences in cannulation time and procedure-related complications were found between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FMD induced by a 5-min upper arm occlusion may facilitate radial artery cannulation in patients undergoing intravenous general anesthesia.
ABSTRACT
Sternal reentry for repair of aortic pseudoaneurysms poses a unique technical challenge to prevent exsanguination. Initiation of peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest prior to reentry are the cornerstones of a successful surgical approach. Adjunctive bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion increases safe arrest time and reduces neurologic morbidity. Herein, we describe our safe reentry technique for aortic pseudoaneurysm repair in two patients.
ABSTRACT
Paclitaxel, which features low water solubility and permeability, is an efflux pump substrate. The current paclitaxel drugs are given intravenously after resolving the solubility issue. Yet, oral delivery to achieve therapeutic bioavailability is not effective due to low absorption. This study evaluated a natural compound, rubusoside, to improve oral bioavailability in an animal model. Free paclitaxel molecules were processed into nano-micelles formed in water with rubusoside. The particle size of the nano-micelles in water was determined using dynamic light scattering. The oral bioavailability of paclitaxel in nano-micelles was determined against Cremophor/alcohol-solubilized Taxol after oral and intravenous administration to pre-cannulated Sprague Dawley rats. When loaded into the rubusoside-formed nano-micelles, paclitaxel reached a supersaturated concentration of 6 mg/mL, 60,000-fold over its intrinsic saturation of 0.1 µg/mL. The mean particle size was 4.7 ± 0.7 nm in diameter. Compared with Taxol®, maximum blood concentration was increased by 1.5-fold; the time to reach maximum concentration shortened to 0.8 h from 1.7 h; and, relative oral bioavailability increased by 88%. Absolute oral bioavailability was 1.7% and 1.3% for the paclitaxel nano-micelles and Taxol®, respectively. Solubilizing paclitaxel with rubusoside was successful, but oral bioavailability remained low. Further inhibition of the efflux pump and/or first metabolism may allow more oral paclitaxel to enter systemic circulation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Aortic arch disease is a major cause of acute dissections. Surgical replacement is the current curative treatment for aortic arch disease. While traditional aortic cannulation ensures lower body perfusion, axillary cannulation offers optimum cerebral perfusion. AIM: To evaluate the outcomes of aortic and axillary cannulation methods in hemiarch replacements, focusing on postoperative perfusion and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 91 patients who underwent hemiarch replacement surgery between February 2007 and October 2016. Patients were divided into two groups based on the cannulation method: aortic cannulation (54 patients) and axillary cannulation (37 patients). Data regarding preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were analyzed, including demographics, surgical outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Demographic analysis showed comparable characteristics between the two groups, with notable differences in aortic disease severity and classification. Patients in the axillary group had a larger ascending aorta diameter (57.7 ± 10.8 mm vs. 51.8 ± 5.7 mm, p = 0.002) and a higher prevalence of acute dissections (27.0% (n = 10) vs. 3.7% (n = 2), p = 0.001). Cerebral protection methods varied significantly between the two groups (p < 0.001). Antegrade cerebral perfusion was used in 37.8% (n = 14) of the axillary group compared to 3.7% (n = 2) of the central group. The central cannulation group had a higher proportion of patients with temperatures under 20 °C (98.1% (n = 53) vs. 21.6% (n = 8), p < 0.001), whereas the axillary group maintained higher temperatures (24 -28 °C) in 68.6% (n = 23) of cases. AV repair/replacement was more frequent in the aortic cannulation group (48.2% (n = 26) vs. 18.9% (n = 7), p = 0.013). No significant disparities were observed in operative mortality or intraoperative complications. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups in the in-hospital outcomes, but renal complications were more prevalent in the axillary cannulation group with 21.6% (n = 8) experiencing acute kidney injury compared to 9.3% (n = 5) in the central group (p = 0.098). The overall survival rate was slightly higher in the aortic cannulation group at various follow-up periods, yet no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: We found no significant differences in safety and efficacy between axillary cannulation and aortic cannulation in hemiarch replacement procedures.
Subject(s)
Aortic Dissection , Axillary Artery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Catheterization, Peripheral , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Risk Factors , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Dissection/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Time Factors , Cerebrovascular Circulation , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/mortality , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Aorta, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aorta, Thoracic/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary diseases. However, selective biliary cannulation, the essential first step in ERCP, can sometimes fail due to anatomical variations or technical limitations. In these cases, the endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous technique (EUS-RV) offers a valuable salvage option. Nevertheless, it is crucial to be aware of potential adverse events associated with bile duct puncture. To optimize the success rate and safety of EUS-RV, understanding the basic techniques, technical tips for each procedural step, and troubleshooting strategies for potential difficulties is essential. This review article summarizes the clinical outcomes and technical considerations of EUS-RV, including a comprehensive analysis of the current evidence.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to determine the effect of the sound of running water, which we had not previously encountered being used in dialysis patients, on invasive pain and anxiety experienced during cannulation. METHODS: The research was conducted as a randomized, controlled study. A descriptive form, a VAS pain scale, and state-trait anxiety scales were used as a data collection form. The data were analyzed on SPSS version 22.00 for Windows software. The independent groups t-test was applied to compare descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation, number, and percentage in independent groups, while categorical data were compared using the chi-square test. The effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable was tested using linear regression analysis. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study was completed with 32 experimental and 33 control group patients. There was no significant difference in pre-intervention pain and anxiety between the groups. The pain levels of the patients after the first and 12th cannulations were significantly lower in the experimental group (p < 0.05). State and trait anxiety levels were also significantly lower in the experimental group at the 12th session (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the sound of running water has a significant positive effect on pain and anxiety experienced during cannulation by dialysis patients. We recommend that clinicians apply such a simple method as listening to the sound of running water for reducing pain and anxiety during invasive procedures.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Precut over a pancreatic duct stent (PPDS) and transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy (TPS) with immediate pancreatic duct stent placement are techniques employed to promote biliary access during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in cases of challenging biliary cannulation. However, limited data are available to compare the efficacy of these two pancreatic stent-assisted precut sphincterotomy techniques. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of PPDS versus TPS. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of consecutive patients who underwent ERCP between April 1, 2019 and May 31, 2023. According to the selected cannulation approaches, patients were assigned to two groups. In the PPDS group, a pancreatic duct stent was initially placed, followed by needle-knife precut over the stent. In the TPS group, transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy was initially performed, followed by immediate pancreatic stent placement. The success rate of biliary cannulation and the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) between the two groups were analysed. RESULTS: Among 864 patients who underwent ERCP, 46 patients were equally enrolled in the two groups. Selective bile duct cannulation was successfully achieved in 42 out of 46 (91.3%) cases using the PPDS and in 32 out of 46 (69.6%) cases using TPS technique alone, indicating significantly higher success rate of bile duct cannulation with PPDS compared to TPS (91.3% vs. 69.6%, P = 0.009). The overall success rates for bile duct cannulation were 93.5% and 97.8% in the PPDS and TPS groups, respectively, with no significant difference identified (P = 0.307). PEP occurred in 0 and 4 (8.7%) cases in the PPDS and TPS groups, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (8.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.117). There were no cases of bleeding or perforation in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Both PPDS and TPS followed by immediate pancreatic duct stent placement are viable options. TPS stands out for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, while PPDS is more appropriate for patients who are at a high-risk of developing PEP.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare women with proximal tubal obstruction (PTO) undergoing hysteroscopic tubal cannulation with fluoroscopic guidance vs. laparoscopic guidance. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: All fluoroscopically-guided hysteroscopic tubal cannulations were performed in an ambulatory suite. All laparoscopically-guided hysteroscopic tubal cannulations were performed in a hospital operating room. Patients: Infertile women with unilateral or bilateral PTO on hysterosalpingography who failed selective salpingography in the radiology suite and had a planned laparoscopy or hysteroscopy in the operating room for defects seen on sonohysterography were studied. Intervention: All women had a Novy catheter system positioned hysteroscopically to cannulate the occluded fallopian tube(s). Women undergoing fluoroscopically guided hysteroscopic tubal cannulation (FHTC), which used contrast and C-arm pelvic imaging at an ambulatory center, were compared with those undergoing hospital-based laparoscopically guided hysteroscopic tubal cannulation (LHTC) with laparoscopic visualization. Main Outcome Measurements: Tubal cannulation success; bilateral cannulation success; tubal perforations; post-FHTC non-in vitro fertilization (non-IVF) intrauterine pregnancies; days from procedure to pregnancy for non-IVF intrauterine pregnancies; and time to non-IVF pregnancy hazards ratio. Results: A total of 76 infertile women undergoing either FHTC (34 women) or LHTC (42 women) between 2015 and 2019 were included. Demographic variables were similar among the 2 groups. A total of 31 (92%) of 34 of patients undergoing FHTC and 36 (86%) of 42 of patients undergoing LHTC had at least one tube successfully cannulated. In total, 30 (78%) of 34 of patients undergoing FHTC and 32 (79%) of 42 patients undergoing LHTC had all occluded tubes successfully cannulated. Tubal perforation occurred in 1 (3%) of 34 FHTC cases and 3 (7%) of 42 LHTC cases. A similar percentage of non-IVF treatment-induced intrauterine pregnancies were achieved in the FHTC and LHTC groups (10/34 [29%] vs. 12/42 [29%]). Among patients who conceived without IVF, time from procedure to pregnancy was lower in the FHTC group (101 ± 124.6 days) compared with the LHTC group (228 ± 216 days). There was a significant difference in time to pregnancy when only those who conceived were considered (hazard ratio, 9.39; 95% confidence interval, 2.42-36.51); however, there was no significant difference when all subjects regardless of pregnancy outcome were analyzed (hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-3.446). Conclusion: Fluoroscopically guided hysteroscopic tubal cannulation is a safe, effective, incision free procedure that results in comparable rates of tubal patency and intrauterine pregnancies as LHTC. This technique should be considered in women undergoing treatment of PTO when operative laparoscopy is not otherwise indicated.
ABSTRACT
Aim and background: Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization is a frequently performed procedure. Additional techniques such as acoustic shadowing-assisted ultrasound may be useful in improving success rate. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of acoustic shadowing assisted ultrasound for arterial catheterization. Materials and methods: PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, EMCARE, and MedNar were searched in January 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing the first attempt success rate of arterial catheterization using acoustic shadowing ultrasound vs unassisted ultrasound were included. Data were pooled for risk ratios (RRs) using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on a single or double acoustic line. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken after excluding pediatric data. The certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed using the GRADE framework. Results: Six randomized controlled trials (n = 777) were included. A meta-analysis found the first attempt success rate is significantly higher in the acoustic ultrasound group (n = 6, RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.66, p ≤ 0.00001). Hematoma formation was significantly less in the acoustic ultrasound group (n = 6, RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.34-0.80, p = 0.003). First attempt success was significantly higher in the single acoustic line ultrasound (USG) group compared to the unassisted ultrasound group (n = 3, RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.59, p ≤ 0.00001). Sensitivity analysis after excluding pediatric data was similar to the primary analysis (n = 5, RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.70, p ≤ 0.00001). Certainty of evidence was "Moderate" for the first attempt cannulation. Conclusions: Acoustic shadowing-assisted ultrasound improved first-attempt arterial catheterization success rate and was associated with reduced hematoma formation. How to cite this article: Mishra L, Rath C, Wibrow B, Anstey M, Ho K. Acoustic Shadowing to Facilitate Ultrasound Guided Arterial Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):677-685.