ABSTRACT
Camrelizumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor clinically used to treat various types of tumours. In this study, the authors provided the first report of a case of an anaphylactic reaction induced by camrelizumab in the treatment of a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the floor of the mouth. The patient, a 58-year-old man, was diagnosed with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the floor of the mouth, with cancer infiltration and multiple metastases. He underwent treatment for nine cycles, in which cycles 1-5 he received camrelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and cisplatin (200 mg of camrelizumab each time, every 3 weeks), with no adverse reactions; in cycle 6, he received albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin, with no adverse reactions; and in cycles 7-9, he received camrelizumab and albumin-bound paclitaxel. However, 30 min after 8th administration of camrelizumab (cycle 9), he suddenly developed sweating, a pale complexion, clamminess and cyanosis of the limbs (percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation [SpO2] = 82%, blood pressure [BP] = 79/49 mmHg, heart rate [HR] = 83 beats/min [bpm] and respiratory rate [RR) = 12 bpm). The patient underwent intravenous infusion of methylprednisolone (80 mg) combined with dopamine to boost the BP; he regained consciousness 20 min later, and many parts of his skin appeared smooth, with no desquamation and accompanied by itching erythema, especially on the upper limbs. Approximately 2 h after treatment, the patient's skin erythema subsided (vital sign monitoring results: SpO2 = 100%, BP = 122/84 mmHg, HR = 91 bpm and RR = 17 bpm); the patient did not complain about his obvious discomfort. Despite the rarity of acute anaphylactic reactions among immune-related adverse reactions, great importance should be given to anaphylactic reactions of camrelizumab due to its extensive clinical application.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Floor of mouth squamous cell carcinoma (SCCFOM) is a rare but aggressive malignancy with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates below 40% in published studies. However, the clinicopathological predictors of the prognosis of SCCFOM remain undefined. We aimed to establish a model to predict the survival outcomes of SCCFOM. METHODS: We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients diagnosed with SCCFOM between 2000 and 2017. Data on patient demographics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were retrieved. Risk factors for OS were evaluated by survival and Cox regression analyses. A nomogram for OS was developed based on the multivariate model and split the patients into high- and low-risk cohorts based on cutoff values. RESULTS: Overall, 2014 SCCFOM patients were included in this population-based study. Multivariate Cox regression showed that age, married status, grade, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery were significant risk factors for survival. A nomogram was established using the regression model. The C-indices, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, and calibration plots demonstrated the reliable performance of the nomogram. Patients assigned to the high-risk group had a significantly lower survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram predicting survival outcomes of SCCFOM patients based on clinical information showed good discriminative ability and prognostic accuracy. Our nomogram could be used to predict the survival probabilities for SCCFOM patients at different timepoints.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Nomograms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Mouth , SEER Program , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the reason of necrosis for pedunculated skin flaps repaired after floor of the mouth defect repair.Methods 56 cases of pedunclated-flaps restoring the floor of the mouth from 1996 to 2001 were reviewed, and pedunclated-flap repair was performed after operation in 11 cases suffering from malignant tumors in the floor of the mouth, and 5 kinds of pedunculated flaps were compared.Results Five kinds of pedunculated flaps were used to reconstruct the floor of the mouth defects. Its successful sequence was as following: forehead flap, pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, sternocleidomastoid flaps,trapezius myocutaneous flaps, and subhyoid flap.Conclusions Causes of those flaps necrosis might relate to furnishing blood with supplied-flaps region and structure of anatomy in received-flaps region, also it is related to operater's skill.So the reason of repair failure of skin flaps with pedicle needs comprehensive analysis.
