Universal Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment in Pregnancy: Call to Action JACC: Advances Expert Panel.

The United States has the highest maternal mortality rate among developed countries, with cardiovascular disease (CVD) being one of the leading causes of maternal deaths. Diagnosing CVD during pregnancy may be challenging as symptoms of normal pregnancy overlap with those of CVD. Delays in recognition and response to the diagnosis of CVD is a missed opportunity for timely intervention to improve maternal outcomes. Implementing universal CVD risk assessment for all pregnant and postpartum patients across clinical care settings presents a pivotal opportunity to address this issue. Integrating a validated risk assessment tool into routine obstetric care, clinicians, including obstetricians, primary care, and emergency healthcare providers, can enhance awareness of cardiovascular risk and facilitate early CVD diagnosis. Consensus among stakeholders underscores the importance of screening and education on cardiovascular health strategies for pregnant and postpartum patients to reduce CVD-related maternal mortality. This comprehensive approach offers a pathway to identify at-risk individuals and intervene promptly, potentially saving lives and advancing maternal healthcare equity.

Obstetric anesthesia management of dilated cardiomyopathies and heart failure: a narrative review.

Pregnancy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy carries a significantly increased risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity, and pregnancy is typically considered contraindicated for patients with severely reduced ventricular function. Nonetheless, anesthesiologists will still encounter patients with cardiomyopathy requiring delivery or termination care. This review describes how NT-ProBNP testing and echocardiography can help with early recognition of heart failure in pregnancy, and describes a suggested approach to anesthetic management of patients with cardiomyopathies or acute heart failure, including hemodynamic goals, use of vasoactive medications and mechanical support. Vaginal delivery, with effective neuraxial anesthesia is the preferred mode of delivery in most patients with cardiomyopathy, with cesarean delivery reserved for maternal or fetal indications. The Pregnancy Heart Team is vital in coordinating the multidisciplinary care necessary to safely support these patients through pregnancy.

Outcome reporting in studies on pregnant women with cardiac disease: a systematic review: Outcomes in studies on pregnancy and heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Although considerable variation in the reporting and definition of outcomes in cardio-obstetric studies is known, the extent of this variation has not been documented. The primary objective of this systematic review was to highlight this variation and inform the development of a Core Outcome Set for studies on Cardiac disease in Pregnancy (COSCarP). METHODS: Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central databases were searched from 1980 to 2018 to identify all English-language publications on pregnancy and heart disease. Title/abstract screening and data extraction which included details on the study, patient population, and all reported outcomes, was performed in duplicate by two reviewers. As the aim of the review was to identify variation in outcome reporting, risk-of-bias assessment was not performed. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42016038218). RESULTS: The final analysis included 422 cardio-obstetric studies. Maternal mortality or survival were reported in 232/422 studies, with inconsistency in terms of cause of death [all-cause (n=65), cardiac (n=55) or obstetric (n=10)] or timeframe (ranging from in-hospital mortality (n=11) to mortality 5 years following pregnancy). In 95/232 studies (41%), the cause and timeframe were not specified. Similar inconsistencies in reporting and definitions were noted for outcomes such as heart failure (n=298), perinatal loss (n=296), fetal growth (n=221), bleeding (n=205), arrhythmias (n=202), preterm birth (n=191), thromboembolism (n=153) and hypertensive disorders (n=122). Functioning / life-impact and adverse effects of treatment were sparingly reported in cardio-obstetric studies. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review hopes to create awareness among cardio-obstetric teams about the inconsistencies in reporting and defining outcomes which makes it difficult to compare studies and perform meta-analyses. COSCarP which is being developed through international consensus between patients and care-providers will provide cardio-obstetrics teams with a minimal set of outcomes to be reported in future cardio-obstetric studies.

Echocardiography for Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be a leading contributor to maternal mortality and morbidity. Echocardiography is an essential tool for patients with suspected and known CVD to establish symptom etiology, treatment strategy, and prognosis. We summarize the current status of conventional and novel techniques for assessment of CVD during pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS: Conventional techniques are still useful for evaluation of known or suspected CVD. Advanced technology using speckle tracking continues to evolve and is increasingly applied for diagnosis of subclinical disease including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Precise recommendations on how frequently echocardiography should be performed and for whom remain in flux. However, a recently published consensus statement and new screening tool for pregnancy assessment of patients with valvular heart disease provide additional advice on using this modality. Echocardiography remains the diagnostic modality of choice for evaluation and risk stratification in pregnancy.

Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy: Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Associated Burdens From a National Cohort at Delivery.

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) in pregnancy is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States, with an increasing prevalence. Objectives: This study aimed to examine risk factors for adverse maternal cardiac, maternal obstetric, and neonatal outcomes as well as costs for pregnant people with CVD at delivery. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample 2010-2019 and the Internal Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes, all pregnant people admitted for their delivery hospitalization were included. CVD diagnoses included congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias, and valvular disease. Multivariable regressions were used to analyze major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), maternal and fetal complications, length of stay, and resource utilization. Results: Of the 33,639,831 birth hospitalizations included, 132,532 (0.39%) had CVD. These patients experienced more frequent MACE (8.5% vs 0.4%, P < 0.001), obstetric (24.1% vs 16.6%, P < 0.001), and neonatal complications (16.1% vs 9.5%, P < 0.001), and maternal mortality (0.16% vs 0.01%, P < 0.001). Factors associated with MACE included cardiomyopathy (adjusted OR [aOR]: 49.9, 95% CI: 45.2-55.1), congenital heart disease (aOR: 13.8, 95% CI: 12.0-15.9), Black race (aOR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00-1.08), low income (aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11), and governmental insurance (aOR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.07). On adjusted analysis, CVD was associated with higher odds of maternal mortality (aOR: 9.28, 95% CI: 6.35-13.56), stillbirth (aOR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.49-1.85), preterm birth (aOR: 1.33, 1.27-1.39), and congenital anomalies (aOR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.69-1.99). CVD was also associated with an increase of $2,598 (95% CI: $2,419-2,777) per patient during admission for delivery. Conclusions: CVD in pregnancy is associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes. Our study highlights the association of key clinical and demographic factors with CVD during pregnancy to emphasize those at highest risk for complications.

Reach and effectiveness of a non-university cardio-obstetrics program.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend multidisciplinary cardiovascular obstetric programs (CVOB) to manage complex pregnant patients with cardiovascular disease. Minimal evaluation of these programs exists, with most of these programs offered at university-based centers. METHODS: A cohort of 113 patients managed by a CVOB team at a non-university health system (2018-2019) were compared to 338 patients seen by cardiology prior to the program (2016-2017). CVOB patients were matched with comparison patients (controls) on modified World Health Organization (mWHO) category classification, yielding a cohort of 102 CVOB and 102 controls. RESULTS: CVOB patients were more ethnically diverse and cardiovascular risk was higher compared to controls based on mWHO ≥ II-III (57% vs 17%) and. After matching, CVOB patients had more cardiology tests during pregnancy (median of 8 tests vs 5, p < .001) and were more likely to receive telemetry care (32% vs 19%, p = .025). The median number of perinatology visits was significantly higher in the CVOB group (8 vs 2, p < .001). Length of stay was a half day longer for vaginal delivery patients in the CVOB group (median 2.66 vs 2.13, p = .006). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a CVOB program resulted in a more diverse patient population than previously referred to cardiology. The CVOB program participants also experienced a higher level of care in terms of increased cardiovascular testing, monitoring, care from specialists, and appropriate use of medications during pregnancy.

Pulmonary Embolism in Patients Admitted With Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Prevalence, Predictors, and Associated In-Hospital Adverse Events.

Introduction Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is defined as an idiopathic left ventricular failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF <45%) that affects women in the last month of pregnancy or in the months after giving birth. The pathophysiology remains elusive, resulting in complications with varied severity; one of the most concerning complications is thromboembolism, specifically pulmonary embolism (PE). The purpose of this study was to characterize and evaluate the real-world prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of PE in PPCM. Methods The data were derived from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from January 2016 to December 2019. The primary outcomes assessed were baseline and hospital admission characteristics and comorbidities for patients with PPCM with or without PE. Outcomes for PPCM patients with PE and predictors of mortality for PPCM were also analyzed. Results PE developed in 105 of 4,582 patients with PPCM (2.3%). Patients with PPCM and PE had longer hospital stays (10.86 days ± 1.4 vs. 5.73 ± 0.2 days, p = 0.001) and total charges ($169,487 ± $39,628 vs. $86,116 ± $3,700, p = 0.001). Patients with PE had a higher burden of coagulopathy (13.3% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.01), intracardiac thrombus (6.7% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.01), and iron deficiency anemia (21.0% vs. 12.6%, p = 0.01). Patients without PE were found to have a higher burden of preeclampsia (14.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.01) and obstructive sleep apnea (5.4% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.045). Predictors of mortality in patients with PPCM included cardiogenic shock (aOR 13.42, 95% CI 7.50-24.03, p = 0.05), PE (aOR 6.60, 95% CI 2.506-17.39, p = 0.05), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI; aOR 3.57, 95% CI 1.35-9.44, p = 0.05), chronic kidney disease (aOR 3.23, 95% CI 1.68-6.22, p = 0.05), and atrial fibrillation (aOR 2.57; 95% CI 1.25-5.30, p = 0.05). Conclusion Although an uncommon complication, PE in PPCM demonstrates an association with higher mortality and financial burden. Along with PE, we found predictors of mortality in PPCM to include atrial fibrillation, NSTEMI, chronic kidney disease, and cardiogenic shock.

Recommendations for the Management of High-Risk Cardiac Delivery: ACC Cardiovascular Disease in Women Committee Panel.

Maternal mortality is a major public health crisis in the United States. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Labor and delivery is a vulnerable time for pregnant individuals with CVD but there is significant heterogeneity in the management of labor and delivery in high-risk patients due in part to paucity of high-quality randomized data. The authors have convened a multidisciplinary panel of cardio-obstetrics experts including cardiologists, obstetricians and maternal fetal medicine physicians, critical care physicians, and anesthesiologists to provide a practical approach to the management of labor and delivery in high-risk individuals with CVD. This expert panel will review key elements of management from mode, timing, and location of delivery to use of invasive monitoring, cardiac devices, and mechanical circulatory support.

Cardiovascular complications during pregnancy: Advancing cardio-obstetrics.

As the incidence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) continues to rise among women of childbearing age, the pregnant population with pre-existing heart conditions presents a complex and heterogeneous profile. These women face varying degrees of risk concerning maternal cardiovascular, obstetric, and fetal complications. Effectively managing adverse cardiovascular events during pregnancy presents substantial clinical challenges. The uncertainties surrounding diagnostic and therapeutic approaches create a dynamic landscape with potential implications for maternal and fetal health. Cardio-obstetrics has become increasingly recognized as a vital multidisciplinary field necessitating a collaborative approach to managing cardiovascular conditions during pregnancy. In this review, we aim to provide a thorough and up-to-date examination of the existing evidence, offering a comprehensive overview of strategies and considerations in the management of cardiovascular complications during pregnancy. Special emphasis is placed on the safety assessment of diagnostic procedures and the exploration of treatment options designed to prioritize the well-being of the mother and fetus. We also explore the significance of a multidisciplinary cardio-obstetrics team in providing comprehensive care for women of childbearing age with or at risk for CVD.

The Impact of Coronary Artery Disease on Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Pre-eclampsia.

Introduction Pre-eclampsia leads to long-lasting cardiovascular effects in women in the postpartum period, but prevalence and in-hospital adverse events of coronary artery disease (CAD) in women with pre-eclampsia are poorly understood. The prevalence, outcomes, and mortality risks identified in this study allow for possible routes of clinical intervention of CAD in women with pre-eclampsia. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and outcomes of CAD in women diagnosed with pre-eclampsia compared to those with pre-eclampsia with no history of CAD. Predictors of mortality in pre-eclampsia were also analyzed. Methods Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample from January 2016 to December 2019. We used the multivariate logistic regression to assess the independent association of CAD with outcomes in patients admitted with pre-eclampsia. We also used the multivariate logistic regression to analyze predictors of mortality in patients hospitalized with pre-eclampsia. Results Women with pre-eclampsia admitted between January 2016 and December 2019 were included in our analysis. A total of 256,010 patients were diagnosed with pre-eclampsia. Of these patients, 174 (0.1%) patients had CAD. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CAD in patients with pre-eclampsia was independently associated with angioplasty (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 62.28; 95% CI 20.459-189.591; p=0.001), permanent pacemaker (aOR 35.129; 95% CI 13.821-89.287; p=0.001), left heart catheterization (aOR 29.416; 95% CI 7.236-119.557; p=0.001), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (aOR 25.832; 95% CI 7.653-87.189; p=0.001), and congestive heart failure (CHF) (aOR 13.948; 95% CI 7.648-25.438; p=0.001). We also used the multivariate logistic regression model to assess predictors of mortality in patients admitted with pre-eclampsia. These included age at admission (aOR 1.064; 95% CI 1.009-1.121; p=0.021), Asian/Pacific-Islander race (aOR 4.893; 95% CI 1.884-12.711; p=0.001), and comorbidities such as CHF (aOR 19.405; 95% CI 6.408-58.768; p=0.001), eclampsia (aOR 17.253; 95% CI 5.323-55.924; p=0.001), syndrome of HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) (aOR 6.204; 95% CI 2.849-13.510; p=0.001), coagulopathy (aOR 6.524; 95% CI 1.997-21.308; p=0.002), and liver disease (aOR 5.217; 95% CI 1.156-23.554; p=0.032). Conclusion In a large cohort of patients admitted with pre-eclampsia, we found the prevalence of CAD to be 0.1%. CAD was associated with several clinical outcomes, including NSTEMI. Predictors of mortality in patients with pre-eclampsia included demographic variables such as age and Asian race, as well as comorbidities such as CHF and coagulopathy.

The Impact of Coronary Artery Disease on Outcomes in Patients With Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.

Introduction The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) among patients admitted with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) as well as to analyze the independent association of CAD with in-hospital outcomes among PPCM patients. Methods Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample from January 2016 to December 2019. We assessed the independent association of CAD with outcomes in patients admitted with PPCM. Predictors of mortality in patients admitted with PPCM were also analyzed. Results There was a total of 4,730 patients with PPCM, 146 of whom had CAD (3.1%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CAD in patients with PPCM was independently associated with several outcomes, and, among them, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 58.457, 95% CI: 5.403-632.504, p= 0.001) was positively associated with CAD. CAD was found to be protective against preeclampsia (aOR: 0.351, 95% CI: 0.126-0.979, p = 0.045). Predictors of in-hospital mortality for patients with PPCM include cardiogenic shock (aOR: 12.818, 95% CI: 7.332-22.411, p = 0.001), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (OR: 3.429, 95% CI: 1.43-8.22, p = 0.006), chronic kidney disease (OR: 2.851, 95% CI: 1.495-5.435, p = 0.001), and atrial fibrillation (OR: 2.326, 95% CI: 1.145-4.723, p = 0.020). Conclusion In a large cohort of patients admitted with PPCM, we found the prevalence of CAD to be 3.1%. CAD was associated with several adverse outcomes, including STEMI, but protective against preeclampsia.

Pulmonary Embolism in Patients Admitted With Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: Prevalence and Associated In-Hospital Adverse Events.

Introduction  Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) is a poorly understood condition typically characterized by abnormal left ventricular wall motion without causative coronary artery disease and typically presents in post-menopausal women after the experience of a physical or emotional stressor. The pathophysiology of TCM is complex and multifactorial, resulting in complications with varied severity; one of the most concerning complications is thromboembolism, specifically, pulmonary embolism (PE), which is understudied in its relation to TCM. The purpose of this study was to characterize and evaluate the real-world prevalence and outcomes of PE in TCM. Methods  Data were derived from the National Inpatient Sample database from January 2016 to December 2019. The primary outcomes assessed were baseline and hospital admission characteristics and comorbidities for patients with TCM with and without PE. Outcomes for TCM patients with PE and predictors of mortality in TCM were also analyzed. Results  PE developed in 788 of 40,120 patients with TCM (1.96%). After multivariate adjustment, PE was found to be independently associated with intracardiac thrombus (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.067; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.198-3.566; p = 0.009) and right heart catheterization (RHC) (aOR: 1.971; 95% CI: 1.160-3.350; p = 0.012). Mortality in patients with TCM was associated with, among other factors, age in years at admission (aOR: 1.104; 95% CI: 1.010-1.017; p = 0.001), African American race (aOR: 1.191; 95% CI: 1.020-1.391; p = 0.027), Asian or Pacific Islander race (aOR: 1.637; 95% CI: 1.283-2.090; p = 0.001), coagulopathy (aOR: 3.393; 95% CI: 2.889-2.986; p = 0.001), liver disease (aOR: 1.446; 95% CI: 1.147-1.824; p = 0.002), atrial fibrillation (aOR: 1.460; 95% CI: 1.320-1.615; p = 0.001), and pulmonary embolism (aOR: 2.217; 95% CI: 1.781-2.760; p = 0.001). Conclusion  In a large cohort of patients admitted with TCM, we found the prevalence of PE to be 1.96%. PE, along with comorbidities such as coagulopathy and atrial fibrillation, was found to be a significant predictor of mortality in this patient cohort.

Cardiac physiology and pathophysiology in pregnancy.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading indirect cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, accounting for nearly one third of maternal deaths during pregnancy. The burden of cardiovascular disease in pregnancy is increasing, as are the incidence of maternal morbidity and mortality. Normal physiologic adaptations to pregnancy, including increased cardiac output and plasma volume, may unmask cardiac conditions, exacerbate previously existing conditions, or create de novo complications. It is important for care providers to understand the normal physiologic changes of pregnancy and how they may impact the care of patients with cardiovascular disease. This review outlines the physiologic adaptions during pregnancy and their pathologic implications for some of the more common cardiovascular conditions in pregnancy.

Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Prevalence, Predictors, and Associated In-Hospital Adverse Events.

Introduction  The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) among patients admitted with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) as well as to analyze the independent association of VT with in-hospital outcomes among PPCM patients. Methods Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample from January 2016 to December 2019. We assessed predictors of VT in patients admitted with PPCM. We also assessed the independent association of VT with clinical outcomes among patients admitted with PPCM. Results From 2016 to 2019, 4730 patients with PPCM were reported to the national inpatient sample database, 309 of which developed VT (6.5%). Using multivariate analysis, we found predictors of VT to include patient characteristics and factors such as age (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.020, p=0.023), chronic kidney disease (aOR=1.440, p=0.048), coagulopathy (aOR=1.964, p=0.006), and atrial fibrillation (aOR=3.965, p<0.001). Conversely, pre-eclampsia was significantly associated with a decreased risk of VT in PPCM patients (aOR=0.218, p=0.001).  Conclusion  In a large cohort of patients admitted with peripartum cardiomyopathy, we found the prevalence of VT to be 6.5%. Risk factors for VT in this patient population included conditions such as coagulopathy and atrial fibrillation.

The Impact of Congestive Heart Failure on Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Preeclampsia.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of congestive heart failure (CHF) among patients admitted with preeclampsia as well as to analyze the independent association of CHF with in-hospital outcomes among women with preeclampsia. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) from January 2016 to December 2019. We assessed the independent association of CHF with outcomes in patients admitted with preeclampsia. Predictors of mortality in patients admitted with preeclampsia were also analyzed. RESULTS: Women with preeclampsia in the United States between 2016 and 2019 were included in our analysis. A total of 256,010 cases were isolated, comprising 1150 patients with preeclampsia and CHF (0.45%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CHF in patients with preeclampsia was independently associated with several outcomes, among them cardiac arrest (adjusted OR (aOR) 4.635, p=0.004), ventricular tachycardia (aOR 17.487, p<0.001), pulmonary embolism (aOR 6.987, p<0.001), and eclampsia (aOR 2.503, p=0.011). Conversely, we found CHF to be protective against postpartum hemorrhage (aOR 0.665, p=0.003). Among the predictors of mortality in preeclampsia are age (aOR 1.062, p=0.022), Asian or Pacific Islander race (aOR 4.695, p=0.001), and CHF (aOR 25.457, p<0.001).  Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients admitted with preeclampsia, we found the prevalence of CHF to be 0.45%. CHF was associated with several adverse outcomes as well as increased length of stay.

Diagnostic and Management Considerations in a High-Risk Pregnant Patient With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Ischemic heart disease is an important cause of heart failure in pregnancy. Involvement of a cardio-obstetrics team is crucial for managing high-risk pregnant patients with cardiovascular disease. We present a case of cardiogenic shock in a pregnant woman unmasking underlying multivessel obstructive coronary artery disease.

Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Pre-eclampsia: Prevalence, Predictors, and Associated In-Hospital Adverse Events.

Introduction Pre-eclampsia is a pregnancy-associated multisystem disorder; in rare cases, it can be complicated by arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia (VT). The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of VT among patients admitted with pre-eclampsia as well as to analyze the independent association of VT with in-hospital outcomes in this population. Methods Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample from January 2016 to December 2019. Patients with a primary diagnosis of pre-eclampsia were selected using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. Subsequently, the study population was divided into patients who developed VT versus patients who did not develop this complication. We then assessed the predictors of VT in women with pre-eclampsia as well as the independent association of VT with outcomes taking into account confounders such as age, race, and comorbidities. Results Of 255,946 patients with pre-eclampsia, 92 developed VT (0.04%) during their hospital stay. Multivariate logistic regression showed that patients with VT were far more likely to develop cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio, or aOR: 92.582, 95% CI: 30.958-276.871, p=0.001), require permanent pacemaker implantation (aOR: 41.866, 95% CI: 14.800-118.432, p=0.001), develop postpartum hemorrhage (aOR: 2.932, 95% CI: 1.655-5.196, p=0.001), and require left heart catheterization (aOR: 19.508, 95% CI: 3.261-116.708, p=0.001). Predictors of VT included being African American (aOR: 1.939, 95% CI: 1.183-3.177, p=0.009), cerebrovascular disease (aOR: 23.109, 95% CI: 6.953-76.802, p=0.001), congestive heart failure (aOR: 50.340, 95% CI: 28.829-87.901, p=0.001), atrial fibrillation (aOR: 20.148, 95% CI: 6.179-65.690, p=0.001), and obstructive sleep apnea, or OSA (aOR: 3.951, 95% CI: 1.486-10.505, p=0.006). Patients in the VT cohort were found to have an increased length of hospital stay compared to the non-VT cohort (7.16 vs. 4.13 days, p=0.001). Conclusion In a large cohort of women admitted with pre-eclampsia, we found the prevalence of VT to be <1%. Predictors of VT included conditions such as atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, and OSA and being African American. VT was found to be independently associated with several adverse outcomes as well as an increased length of hospital stay.

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Pulmonary Hypertension During Pregnancy: A Contemporary Nationwide Analysis.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) disproportionately affects women, presenting challenges during pregnancy. Historically, patients with PH are advised to avoid pregnancy; however, recent reports have indicated that the incidence of adverse events in pregnant patients with PH may be lower than previously reported. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in pregnant patients with PH using the National Readmission Database from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. PH was categorized according to the World Health Organization classification. Primary end points include maternal mortality and 30-day nonelective readmission rate. Other adverse short-term maternal (cardiovascular and obstetric) and fetal outcomes were also analyzed. Of 9,922,142 pregnant women, 3,532 (0.04%) had PH, with Group 1 PH noted in 1,833 (51.9%), Group 2 PH in 676 (19.1%), Group 3 PH in 604 (17.1%), Group 4 PH in 23 (0.7%), Group 5 PH in 98 (2.8%), and multifactorial PH in 298 (8.4%). PH patients exhibited higher rates of adverse cardiovascular events (15.7% vs 0.3% without PH, p <0.001) and mortality (0.9% vs 0.01% without PH, p <0.001). Mixed PH and Group 2 PH had the highest prevalence of adverse cardiovascular events in the World Health Organization PH groups. Patients with PH had a significantly higher nonelective 30-day readmission rate (10.4% vs 2.3%) and maternal adverse obstetric events (24.2% vs 9.1%) compared with those without PH (p <0.001) (Figure 1). In conclusion, pregnant women with PH had significantly higher adverse event rates, including in-hospital maternal mortality (85-fold), compared with those without PH.