Determinants of Pre- and Post-Procedural Neurological Assessment, and Outcome of Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting.

Background: The German-Austrian guideline on the treatment of carotid stenosis recommends specialist neurological assessment (NA) before and after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS). This study analyzes the determinants of NA and the association of NA with the perioperative rate of stroke or death. Materials and Methods: This study is a pre-planned sub-study of the ISAR-IQ project, which analyzes data from the nationwide German statutory quality assurance carotid database. Patients were classified as asymptomatic (group A), elective symptomatic (group B), and others (group C: emergency (C1), simultaneous operation (C2), and other indications (C3)). The primary outcome event (POE) of this study was any in-hospital stroke or death. Adjusted odds ratios for pre- and post-NA and the POE were calculated using multivariable regression analyses. Results: We analyzed 228,133 patients (54% asymptomatic, 68% male, mean age 72 years) undergoing CEA or CAS between 2012 and 2018. Age and sex were not associated with the likelihood of pre-NA or post-NA. The multivariable regression analysis showed an inverse association between pre-NA and POE (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.47; 95% CI 0.44-0.51, p < 0.001), and a direct association of post-NA and POE (aOR 4.39; 95% CI 4.04-4.78, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Pre- and postinterventional specialist NA is strongly associated with the risk of any in-hospital stroke or death after CEA or CAS in Germany. A relevant confounding by indication or reversed causation cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, to improve the quality assurance of treatment, the NA recommended in the guideline should be carried out consistently.

Comparative Analysis of Balloon Angioplasty Alone versus Carotid Artery Stenting for Severe Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Four-Year Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of balloon angioplasty alone (BAA) with carotid artery stenting (CAS) for severe extracranial carotid artery stenosis (ECAS). The primary outcomes assessed were restenosis requiring retreatment and symptomatic stroke occurrence within a four-year follow-up period. METHODS: A total of 77 patients with 89 carotid artery stenoses undergoing endovascular carotid revascularization (ECR) between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. Neuroradiological evaluations, including computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), were performed at defined intervals. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare patient characteristics, angiographic outcomes, and clinical outcomes between the BAA and CAS groups. RESULTS: The study demonstrated successful outcomes in both groups with low adverse event rates. The overall restenosis rate was 40.2%, but severe restenosis requiring retreatment occurred in only 10 cases (7 in BAA, 3 in CAS). No significant difference was found in retreatment rates between the two groups (p=0.53). Stroke occurrence within the four-year follow-up period was observed in three patients, with no statistically significant difference between BAA and CAS groups CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness of BAA and CAS for severe ECAS. Despite slightly shorter intervals to restenosis in the BAA group, there was no significant difference in retreatment or stroke occurrence rates between the two procedures. BAA offers advantages in terms of retreatment options.

Outcome of CAS under flow reversal and analysis for the intraprocedural flow of internal carotid artery.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) under flow reversal with dual protection using a proximal balloon and distal filter has been an established procedure for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. This study investigates the effect of external carotid artery (ECA) occlusion on outcomes of CAS and ICA flow under flow reversal. METHODS: We reviewed 231 cases of CAS under flow reversal with ECA occlusion and 32 without. In the last 14 of 32 cases, the flow in the ICA under flow reversal was analyzed by ultrasound. The collateral index, which was defined as the total value of the maximum diameters of the ipsilateral anterior cerebral artery at the A1 segment and the anterior communicating artery, as well as those of the ipsilateral posterior cerebral artery at the P1 segment and the ipsilateral posterior communicating artery, and the maximum diameter of the ipsilateral ECA were correlated with the flow direction in the ICA. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the outcome of CAS between the groups with or without ECA occlusion. Among the 14 cases without ECA occlusion, antegrade flow in the ICA was observed in 6 cases (42.9 %). The group with the antegrade flow in the ICA exhibited a significantly lower collateral index (5.08±0.33 vs 6.71±0.28, p=0.01) and a significantly larger ECA diameter (4.66±0.51 mm vs 3.21±1.24 mm, p=0.01) than the group with the stagnant or retrograde flow in the ICA. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of CAS under flow reversal were acceptable even without ECA occlusion. The ECA occlusion may not be necessary for CAS under dual protection; however, distal filter protection should be used even under flow reversal.

Focal Non-aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage After Carotid Artery Stenting: A Case Report.

Minor non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) following carotid artery stenting (CAS) is exceedingly rare and less described, with its underlying mechanism elusive. Here, we present the case of a 75-year-old female who underwent CAS for progressive asymptomatic severe stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Her post-procedural course remained uneventful, with no intracranial hemorrhage detected on the following day's magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, a routine MRI on the seventh post-procedural day identified a small amount of SAH in the central sulcus on the operative side. In the absence of symptoms, the patient was discharged home after a computed tomography (CT) scan revealed no signs of hemorrhagic enlargement the following day. In this report, we document the rare occurrence of localized SAH post-CAS. There are limited reports of minor SAH following CAS, with the underlying mechanisms remaining unclear. In this report, the localization of SAH aligns with the most critical ischemic sites, indicating that the mechanism of focal SAH after CAS is associated with blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption due to a rapid increase in blood flow to small vessels with impaired vascular autoregulation. Focal convexity SAH is an easily overlooked finding, and the medical team performing carotid artery revascularization procedures should be aware of the potential for such SAH postoperatively and exercise caution during postoperative imaging interpretation.

Carotid stenosis in logistic restraints Optimizing treatment of significant carotid artery stenosis in times of logistic restraints as a result of COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 confronted medical care with many challenges. During the pandemic, several resources were limited resulting in renouncing or postponing medical care like carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for patients with significant carotid artery stenosis. Although according to international guidelines CEA is the first choice, carotid artery stenting (CAS) could potentially be a reasonable alternative especially during logistical restraints. PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of CAS versus CEA before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Our hypothesis was that a CAS first approach yielded comparable outcomes compared to a CEA first approach. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with significant carotid artery stenosis treated with CEA or CAS between September 2018 and March 2023. Each consecutive period of 1.5 year marked a new (treatment) period: pre-COVID (CEA first strategy), during COVID (CAS first strategy) and post COVID (patient tailored approach). Primary outcome was the composite endpoint of stroke, TIA or death within 30 days. Secondary outcome consisted of the rate of technical success, cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome, myocardial infarction or other cardiac complications needing intervention, bleeding of the surgical site needing intervention, nerve palsy, unintended IC admission, pseudoaneurysm, restenosis or occlusion. RESULTS: A total of 318 patients were included. Out of 137 patients treated with CEA, 55, 36 and 46 were treated pre-COVID, during COVID and post-COVID, respectively. Out of 181 CAS procedures, 38, 59 and 84, respectively, were performed in each time period. Primary outcome occurred in 5.5%, 0% and 2.2% in the CEA group and 0%, 1.7% and 3.6% in the CAS group (p = .27; p = 1.00; p = 1.00, respectively). Overall technical success was 100% for CEA and 99.4% for CAS (p = 1.00). Rate of restenosis was the only secondary outcome measure which was significantly better after CAS compared to CEA in the pre- and post-COVID period (CEA vs CAS, 12.7% vs 7.9% and 23.9% vs 4.8% with a p-value of .03 and .03, respectively). Hospital presentation to treatment interval did not differ significantly during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Outcomes were comparable between CAS versus CEA in patients with significant carotid artery stenosis before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. CAS showed better results in terms of other complications (i.e., restenosis rate) in the pre- and post-COVID period compared to CEA. Our results may support a CAS first approach when no relevant contra-indications exist without exposing the patient to complications associated with an open surgical approach. Discussion in a multidisciplinary team is advised.

A multi-center study of the MicroNET-covered stent in consecutive patients with acute carotid-related stroke: SAFEGUARD-STROKE.

Introduction: Acute carotid-related stroke (CRS), with its large thrombo-embolic load and large volume of affected brain tissue, poses significant management challenges. First generation (single-layer) carotid stents fail to insulate the athero-thrombotic material; thus they are often non-optimized (increasing thrombosis risk), yet their use is associated with a significant (20-30%) risk of new cerebral embolism. Aim: To evaluate, in a multi-center multi-specialty investigator-initiated study, outcomes of the MicroNET-covered (cell area ≈ 0.02-0.03 mm2) carotid stent (CGuard, InspireMD) in consecutive CRS patients eligible for emergency recanalization. Treatment, other than study device use, was according to center/operator routine. Material and methods: Seventy-five patients (age 40-89 years, 26.7% women) were enrolled in 7 interventional stroke centers. Results: The median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was 9 (6-10). Study stent use was 100% (no other stent types implanted); retrograde strategy predominated (69.2%) in tandem lesions. Technical success was 100%. Post-dilatation balloon diameter was 4.0 to 8.0 mm. 89% of patients achieved final modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-c/3. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use as intraarterial (IA) bolus + intravenous (IV) infusion was an independent predictor of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 13.9, 95% CI: 5.1-84.5, p < 0.001). The mortality rate was 9.4% in-hospital and 12.2% at 90 days. Ninety-day mRS0-2 was 74.3%, mRS3-5 13.5%; stent patency was 93.2%. Heparin-limited-to-flush predicted patency loss on univariate (OR = 14.3, 95% CI: 1.5-53.1, p < 0.007) but not on multivariate analysis. Small-diameter balloon/absent post-dilatation was an independent predictor of stent patency loss (OR = 15.2, 95% CI: 5.7-73.2, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This largest to-date study of the MicroNET-covered stent in consecutive CRS patients demonstrated a high acute angiographic success rate, high 90-day patency and favorable clinical outcomes despite variability in procedural strategies and pharmacotherapy (SAFEGUARD-STROKE NCT05195658).

Comparison Of The Treatment Strategies For Symptomatic Chronic Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion.

BACKGROUND: The best management of symptomatic chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) has been controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis were to compare the outcomes of different treatment strategies for symptomatic CICAO. METHODS: Two independent researchers conducted a search of articles on the treatment of CICAO published between January 2000 and October 2023 in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library. Twenty-two articles were eligible for meta-analysis using a random effects model to combine and analyze the data for the pooled rates of stroke and death, and the rates of procedural success and significant restenosis/occlusion. RESULTS: Total of 1193 patients from 22 publications were included in this study. 6 of them had bilateral internal carotid artery occlusion. The 30-day stroke and death rates were 1.1% (95%CI: 0%-4.4%) in the best medical treatment (BMT) group, 4.1% (95%CI: 0.7%-9.3%, I2=71.4%) in the extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass group, 4.4% (95%CI: 2.4% - 6.8%, I2 = 0%) in the carotid artery stenting (CAS) group, and 1.2% (95% CI: 0% - 3.4%, I2 = 0%) in the combined carotid endarterectomy and stenting (CEA+CAS) group. During follow-up of 16.5 (±16.3) months, the stroke and death rates were 19.5%, 1.2%, 6.6%, and 2.4% in BMT, EC-IC, CAS and CEA+CAS groups respectively. The surgical success rate was 99.7% (95%CI: 98.5%-100%, I2=0%) in EC-IC group, 70.1% (95%CI: 62.3%-77.5%, I2=64%) in CAS group, and 86.4% (95%CI: 78.8%-92.7%, I2=60%) in CEA+CAS group. The rate of post-procedural significant restenosis or occlusion was 3.6% in EC-IC group, 18.7% in CAS group, and 5.7% in CEA+CSA group. The surgical success rate was negatively associated by the length of internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion. Surgical success rate was significantly higher in the patients with occlusive lesion within C1 to C4 segments, comparing to those with occlusion distal to C4 segment (OR:11.3, 95%CI: 5.0-25.53, P<0.001). A proximal stump of ICA is a favorable sign for CAS. The success rate of CAS was significantly higher in the patients with an ICA stump than that in the patients without (OR=11.36, 95%CI:4.84-26.64, P<0.01). However, the success rate of CEA+CAS was not affected by the proximal ICA stump. CONCLUSIONS: For the management of symptomatic CICAO, BMT alone is associated with the highest risk of mid- and long-term stroke and death. EC-IC bypass surgery and CEA+CAS should be considered as the choice of treatment based on operator's expertise and patient's anatomy. CAS may be employed as an alternative option in high surgical risk patients, especially when proximal ICA stump exists.

Turn-Over Technique for Inserting and Stabilizing Guiding Sheath without Straightening It during Carotid Artery Stenting via Trans-Brachial Approach in Cases with Severe Vascular Access Conditions.

Objective: In cases of severe atherosclerosis or tortuous arteries, inserting the guiding sheath into the target vessel is challenging. Here, we present the turn-over technique for inserting and stabilizing the guiding sheath without straightening it during carotid artery stenting (CAS). Case Presentation: Two patients with severe left internal carotid artery stenosis underwent CAS via the trans-brachial approach. Although inserting the guiding sheath into the common carotid artery using conventional techniques was challenging, we succeeded in inserting it into the target vessel using the "turn-over technique." At first, the guidewire was U-turned just above the aortic valve and inserted into the left external carotid artery. The inner catheter and guiding sheath were then followed along the guidewire to the left common carotid artery, and the guidewire and inner catheter were removed. The guiding sheath was stable in a U-turned position, and straightening the guiding sheath was difficult. Devices such as stents and balloons could be delivered without problems, and CAS was completed with the guiding sheath in a U-turned position. Conclusion: The turn-over technique for inserting and stabilizing the guiding sheath for CAS via the trans-brachial approach is an option in cases of difficult catheter access due to atherosclerosis or tortuous arteries.

Carotid Interventions in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Narrative Review.

Simultaneous carotid artery stenosis (CS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common condition among patients with several cardiovascular risk factors; however, its optimal management still remains under investigation, such as the assumption that carotid disease is causally related to perioperative stroke and that preventive carotid revascularization decrease the risk of this complication. Synchronous surgical approach to both conditions, performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) before coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) during the same procedure, should still be considered in selective patients, in order to reduce the risk of perioperative stroke during coronary cardiac surgery. For the same purpose, staged approaches, such as CEA followed by CABG or CABG followed by CEA during the same hospitalization or a few weeks later have been described. Hybrid approach with carotid artery stenting (CAS) and CABG can also be an option in selected cases, offering a minimally invasive procedure to treat CS among patients whom CABG cannot be postponed. When carotid intervention is indicated in patients with concomitant CAD requiring CABG, a personalized and tailored approach is mandatory, especially in asymptomatic patients, in order to define the ideal surgical strategy. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current "state of the art" of the different approaches to carotid artery diseases in patients undergoing CABG.

Stenting with dual-layer CGuard stent in acute sub-occlusive carotid artery stenosis and in tandem occlusions: a monocentric study.

PURPOSE: Double-layer design carotid stents have been cast in a negative light since several investigations reported high rates of in-stent occlusions, at least in the acute setting of tandem occlusions. CGuard is a new generation double-layered stent that was designed to prevent periinterventional embolic events. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of the CGuard in emergent CAS and for the acute treatment of tandem occlusions in comparison with the single-layer Carotid Wallstent (CWS) system. METHODS: All patients who underwent CAS with CGuard or CWS after intracranial mechanical thrombectomy (MT) between 11/2018 and 12/2022 were identified from our local thrombectomy registry. Clinical, interventional and neuroimaging data were analyzed. Patency of the stent was assessed within 72 h. Intracranial hemorrhage and modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge were the main endpoints. RESULTS: In total, 86 stent procedures in 86 patients were included (CWS: 44, CGuard: 42). CGuard had a lower, but not statistically significant rate (p = 0.431) of in-stent occlusions (n = 2, 4.8%) when compared to the CWS (n = 4, 9.1%). Significant in-stent stenosis was found in one case in each group. There was no statistically significant difference in functional outcome at discharge between the two groups with a median mRS for CGuard of 2 (IQR:1-5) vs. CWS 3 (IQR:2-4). CONCLUSION: In our series, the rate of in-stent occlusions after emergent CAS was lower with the dual-layer CGuard when compared to the monolayer CWS. Further data are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of the design in more detail.

An extremely rare complication during carotid artery stenting using a Wallstent: Migration of a stent holder of a Carotid Wallstent.

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an established treatment for internal carotid artery stenosis (ICS). The Carotid Wallstent is commonly used as a stent device in CAS procedures. Rare complications associated with the use of the Carotid Wallstent in CAS procedures include delayed shortening and incomplete stent expansion due to displacement of a marker ring. However, there have been no previous reports of a stent holder becoming unpredictably detached from a Carotid Wallstent during a procedure, requiring the additional deployment of another Carotid Wallstent. CASE PRESENTATION: The case of a 72-year-old man with progressive ICS is described. Since the ICS was resistant to medical treatment, CAS was planned to prevent ischemic events. During the procedure, a Mo.Ma Ultra and a carotid guardwire were used for proximal and distal protection, respectively. Following the introduction of those protective devices, a Carotid Wallstent was deployed at the stenotic lesion of the ICS. After the deployment of the Carotid Wallstent, a stent holder unpredictably detached was identified in the lumen of the Carotid Wallstent. Since it was impossible to mechanically retrieve the detached stent holder, another Carotid Wallstent was deployed to trap the substance. Postoperatively, the substance was identified as a stent holder of the first Carotid Wallstent. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of an extremely rare complication concerning a Carotid Wallstent in CAS.

Locoregional Versus General Anesthesia for Carotid Artery Stenting in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.

OBJECTIVES: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be performed by transfemoral or transcervical (TCAR) approaches and with a variety of anesthetic techniques. No current literature clearly supports one anesthetic method over another. We therefore sought to evaluate the outcomes of CAS procedures based on anesthetic approach. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2018. PARTICIPANTS: All individuals undergoing CAS during the study period. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthetic type (locoregional versus general [GA]). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Locoregional anesthesia for CAS was used for 754 (65.5%) patients, with the remainder under GA. Demographic variables were comparable, as were the incidence of symptomatic presentation, high-risk anatomy or physiology, severity of the stenosis, and presence/severity of contralateral carotid disease. There was no difference in composite outcome (stroke, myocardial infarction [MI], and death) (7.0% v 6.1%, p = 0.53). The GA group had lower odds ratio of MI (0.12, p = 0.0362) but higher odds ratio of death (3.33, p = 0.008) and postoperative pneumonia (3.87, p = 0.0083), although on multivariable analysis the risk of death appeared confounded by respiratory variables. Multivariable and propensity score-weighted analyses did not identify a significant association of GA with the composite outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing CAS in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, GA was not associated with the composite outcome but was associated with increased rates of postoperative pneumonia and decreased rates of MI. Further investigation should attempt to better clarify these relationships.

The effect of institutional case volume on post-operative outcomes after endarterectomy and stenting for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of yearly institutional case volume for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and stenting (CAS) among symptomatic carotid stenosis patients on the rates of postoperative stroke and inpatient mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with prior stroke ("symptomatic") undergoing CEA or CAS during an inpatient stay were identified from the National Inpatient Sample for years 2012-2015. The primary variable was volume of CEA or CAS performed annually by each institution. The primary outcome was a composite variable for in-hospital death or postoperative stroke. RESULTS: A total of 5,628 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis underwent CEA, while 245 underwent CAS. In the symptomatic CEA population, 519 (9.2 %) patients experienced postoperative stroke or mortality, and were more likely to be treated at centers with a lower yearly institutional volume (median 10 [IQR 5-15] versus 10 [7-20] cases, p < 0.001). In the symptomatic CAS population, 32 (13.1 %) patients experienced stroke or mortality, and these patients were also more likely to undergo treatment at hospitals with a lower yearly institutional volume (median 5 [IQR 5-7] versus 5 [5-10] cases, p = 0.044). Thresholds for yearly institutional volume found differences in adverse outcome between 0-9, 10-29, and ≥30 cases/year (11.7 % vs 8.4 % vs 6.0 %, p < 0.001) for CEA, and differences in postoperative stroke between 0-9 and ≥10 cases/year for CAS (11.0 % vs 1.4 %, p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals performing higher volumes of CEA or CAS have fewer postoperative strokes. The threshold reported herein is ≥30 CEA procedures or ≥10 CAS procedures annually for appreciably improved outcomes.

Ulceration location is associated with clinical course in carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Plaque ulceration in carotid artery stenosis is a risk factor for cerebral ischemic events; however, the characteristics that determine plaque vulnerability are not fully understood. We thus assessed the association between plaque ulceration sites and cerebrovascular ischemic attack. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 72 consecutive patients diagnosed with carotid artery stenosis with plaque ulcers. After excluding patients with pseudo-occlusion, a history of previous carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting before the ulcer was first discovered, follow-up data of less than 1 month, or carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting performed within 1 month after the ulcer was first discovered, 60 patients were ultimately included. Patients were divided into proximal and distal groups based on the ulcer location relative to the most stenotic point. The primary endpoints were ipsilateral cerebrovascular ischemic events ("ischemic events"), such as amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, or ischemic stroke due to carotid artery stenosis with plaque ulceration. The association between ulcer location and ischemic events was also assessed. RESULTS: In the patients with plaque ulcer, more patients had proximal than distal plaque ulcers (39 vs 21; P = .028). The median follow-up duration was 3.8 years (interquartile range, 1.5-6.2 years). Nineteen patients (32%) experienced ischemic event. Ischemic events occurred more frequently in the distal than in the proximal group (18% vs 59%; P = .005). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a significantly shorter event-free time in the distal group (log-rank P = .021). In univariate analysis, distal ulcer location was associated with ischemic events (odds ratio [OR], 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-7.65; P = .03). Multivariate analysis using two different models also showed that distal ulcer location was independently associated with ischemic events (Model 1: OR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.26-11.78; P = .03; Model 2: OR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.49-12.49; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with carotid artery stenosis and plaque ulcers located distal to the most stenotic point are more likely to experience cerebrovascular ischemic attacks. Therefore, carotid plaques with ulcers located distal to the most stenotic point may be a potential indication for surgical treatment.

Safety and Risk Factors of Carotid Artery Stenting with Simple Distal Filter Protection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Objective: Carotid artery stenting embolic protection devices offer various options, among which distal filter protection is the simplest and easiest to handle. However, compared to balloon protection systems, distal filter protection has more embolic complications. Therefore, we explored the risk factors of distal filter protection, intending to achieve a safer carotid artery stenting. This retrospective study was conducted to identify prognostic factors following carotid artery stenting with only distal filter protection from July 2010 to June 2021. Methods: Information on patient background, procedures and devices, and complications was collected using medical records. The data pertaining to 187 patients were analyzed after excluding the data of patients in whom other protection devices (8 cases) were used. We used FilterWire EZ as the first choice for embolic protection device and SpiderFX when the patients had difficult-to-cross lesions. Results: The patients' mean age was 71.9 ± 6.9 years, and 72 (38.5%) were symptomatic. Symptomatic (odds ratio: 2.02, p = 0.035) and difficult-to-cross lesions (odds ratio: 3.63, p = 0.0013) were factors independently associated with symptomatic complications. Conclusion: This retrospective single-center study established independent prognostic factors for carotid artery stenting with distal filter protection. For patients with symptomatic lesions and severe stenosis or bends that are difficult to pass through, it is necessary to be careful when performing carotid artery stenting with distal filter protection.

Can Three-Dimensional T1-weighted MR Imaging Visualize the Vascular Lumen after Carotid Artery Stenting?

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the quality of various 3D T1-weighted images (T1WIs) of the stent lumen using a carotid stent phantom and determine the suitable T1WI sequence for visualization of the stent lumen after carotid artery stenting. METHODS: The carotid stent phantom consisted of polypropylene tubes that mimicked common carotid arteries with and without stenting. On 1.5T and 3.0T MRI scanners, transverse T1WIs of the carotid stent phantom were obtained using 3D turbo spin-echo (TSE), 3D fast field-echo (3D-FFE), and 3D turbo field echo volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) under clinical conditions. The signal intensity ratio (SIR) was determined using the mean signal intensity of the stent lumen (SIstent) divided by the lumen without a stent in each T1WI. The SNR of the stent lumen (SNRstent) was calculated from SIstent divided by the standard deviation of the uniform region near the stent lumen. RESULTS: The 3D-FFE and VIBE had higher SNRstent than other T1WIs and clearly visualized the stent lumen. The 3D-TSE had the lowest SIR and SNRstent, preventing stent lumen visualization. CONCLUSION: T1WIs obtained using 3D-FFE and VIBE allows stent lumen visualization.

Delayed Stent Infection after Deployment of a Carotid Dual Layer Stent in Dialysis Cases.

Objective: Infection after carotid artery stenting (CAS) is rare. We report two dialysis cases of delayed stent infection associated with a carotid dual-layer stent (DLS), which occurred several months after deployment of the stent. Case Presentations: Case 1: A 74-year-old man receiving dialysis underwent CAS with DLS. Three months after CAS, the patient developed a high fever, neck pain, and neck swelling. Neck CT and carotid ultrasonography (CUS) indicated an abscess around the inserted DLS. The patient was treated with antibiotic agents and fully recovered. Case 2: A 73-year-old man receiving dialysis underwent CAS with DLS. Two months after CAS, this patient also developed a high fever, neck pain, and neck swelling. Contrast-enhanced neck CT indicated inflammatory effusion with an abscess and a giant infectious pseudoaneurysm. Endovascular stent graft reconstruction was employed urgently under antibiotic therapy to prevent its rupture. However, intracranial hemorrhage occurred postoperatively and left hemiparesis remained. Conclusion: Delayed carotid stent infection is a rare but severe complication. The use of a DLS might be avoided during CAS for dialysis cases.

Radical Neck Dissection Following Internal Carotid Artery Endovascular Stenting: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Carotid artery involvement by head and neck cancer is mostly considered as unresectable disease. Mostly, these cases are treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. But when there is recurrent disease, choices are limited. Recent advances in vascular reconstruction and intervention radiology lead the way of addressing these cases with reconstruction or endovascular stenting. We tried to address this challenge in the present case. Endovascular stent provided the protection needed while dissecting over internal carotid artery. Such uncommonly performed techniques should be highlighted for further research.

The Effects of Carotid Revascularization on 1-Year Cognitive Performance in Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis.

PURPOSE: The impact of carotid revascularization on cognitive function for patients with severe carotid artery stenosis remains uncertain. This study is aimed to investigate the 1-year neurocognitive outcomes of patients who accept carotid revascularization and identify the risk factors associated with postoperative cognitive decline. METHODS: From April 2019 to April 2021, patients with ≥70% carotid artery stenosis who were treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) were recruited for this study. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) instrument was used to evaluate cognitive function preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis was built to identify potential risk factors for postoperative long-term cognitive decline. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients who met the criteria were enrolled and completed 1-year follow-up. At 3, 6, and 12 months after carotid revascularization, the total MoCA score, attention, language fluency, and delayed recall score were significantly improved compared with the baseline scores (p<0.05). At 12 months, there was also a significant improvement in cube copying compared with baseline (p=0.034). Logistic regression analysis showed that the advancing age, left side, and symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were independent risk factors for cognitive deterioration at 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, carotid revascularization has a beneficial effect on cognition function in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis, while advancing age, left side, and symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were significantly related to a decreased cognitive score after carotid revascularization. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study focused on the changes in cognitive function within 1 year after carotid revascularization in patients with severe carotid stenosis. Of course, carotid revascularization can improve the cognition function in these patients. On the other hand, we found the advancing age, left side and symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were significantly associated with decreased cognitive scores at 1 year after carotid revascularization, which suggests that clinicians may need to be aware of patients with these characteristics.