Evaluation of the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. Baumannii by the broth disk elution test.

To evaluate the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii using the broth disk elution testing, a total of 150 A. baumannii isolates were collected from across China between January 2019 and January 2021, including 51 carbapenem-susceptible and 99 carbapenem-resistant isolates. Broth disk elution (BDE) and the broth microdilution (BMD) method were performed for all strains. The concentration range of the BDE was 10/10 µg/mL, 20/20 µg/mL, and 30/30 µg/mL for ampicillin-sulbactam, and 37.5/15 µg/mL, 75/30 µg/mL, 112.5/45 µg/mL, and 150/60 µg/mL for cefoperazone-sulbactam, respectively. Compared with BMD, the BDE results of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam showed a categorical agreement of 83.3% (125/150) and 95.3% (143/150), with minor errors of 16.7% (25/150) and 4.7% (7/150), respectively. No major error or very major errors were detected. The sensitivity differences by BDE of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) to different concentrations of ampicillin-sulbactam showed statistically significant (p < 0.017), while those to cefoperazone-sulbactam at 37.5/15 µg/mL, 75/30 µg/mL, and 112.5/45 µg/mL were significant (p < 0.008). However, no significant difference in sensitivity was observed between 112.5/45 µg/mL and 150/60 µg/mL (p > 0.008). In conclusion, the BDE is a reliable and convenient method to detect the in vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii, and the results could serve as a clinical reference value when deciding whether or not to use high-dose sulbactam for the treatment of A. baumannii infections.

Role of the gut microbiota in cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced epilepsy in mice with chronic renal failure.

OBJECTIVES: The mechanism of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced epilepsy in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is not yet clear. We hypothesized that cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced epilepsy could be based on two main factors: neurotoxicity caused by drug accumulation after renal failure and an abnormal gut microbiota (GM). METHODS: A chronic renal failure (CRF) model in mice was established, and then different doses of cefoperazone/sulbactam were injected to induce epilepsy in mice. Normal mouse feces for fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) were collected. We observed the changes in feces, mental state, and activity of each group of mice. After killing, we collected kidneys and colon for H&E staining. We collected mouse feces for the 16S RNA sequencing of bacteria. RESULTS: All CRF mice injected with different concentrations of cefoperazone/sulbactam experienced grade-V seizures and eventually died, whereas normal control mice did not. However, after FMT intervention, the time of epilepsy onset and death in mice was delayed. Early FMT intervention resulted in more mice surviving (p = .0359). Moreover, the villi in the mucosal of group-CS layer fell off, goblet cells missed, and crypts disappeared. The mucosal layer and submucosa were clearly separated. The morphology of intestinal tissue of the CFS and FS group was improved. After FMT, the changes of the GM were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The GM may be involved in the epilepsy induced by cefoperazone/sulbactam in CRF mice. FMT can delay the onset of epilepsy in CRF mice induced by cefoperazone/sulbactam, and the earlier the intervention, the better the effect.

Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin and Combinations of Cephalosporins with ß-Lactamase Inhibitors as an Advancement in Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.

In an era of increasing antibiotic resistance among pathogens, the treatment options for infectious diseases are diminishing. One of the clinical groups especially vulnerable to this threat are patients who are hospitalized in intensive care units due to ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. In order to prevent the exhaustion of therapeutic options for this life-threatening condition, there is an urgent need for new pharmaceuticals. Novel ß-lactam antibiotics, including combinations of cephalosporins with ß-lactamase inhibitors, are proposed as a solution to this escalating problem. The unique mechanism of action, distinctive to this new group of siderophore cephalosporins, can overcome multidrug resistance, which is raising high expectations. In this review, we present the summarized results of clinical trials, in vitro studies, and case studies on the therapeutic efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefiderocol in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. We demonstrate that treatment strategies based on siderophore cephalosporins and combinations of ß-lactams with ß-lactamases inhibitors show comparable or higher clinical efficacy than those used with classic pharmaceuticals, like carbapenems, colistin, or tigecycline, and are often associated with a lower risk of adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of generic cefoperazone/sulbactam versus branded cefoperazone/sulbactam in the treatment of bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aim to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of generic cefoperazone/sulbactam compared to the branded cefoperazone/sulbactam (Sulperazon) in treating bacterial infections through a meta-analysis. Searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP databases, and Clinical Trials database, resulting in the inclusion of 11 studies comprising 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 retrospective cohort studies (RCSs). Meta-analysis of the RCTs indicated no statistical differences in clinical success rates, clinical cure rates, microbiological eradication rates, and incidence of adverse reactions between the generic cefoperazone/sulbactam and the branded version. Findings from the RCSs aligned with those from the RCTs, demonstrating that generic versions of cefoperazone/sulbactam are equivalent in efficacy and safety to their branded counterparts in treating bacterial infections.

Erratum: Comparison of bleeding risk and hypofibrinogenemia-associated risk factors between tigecycline with cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy and other tigecycline-based combination therapies.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1182644.].

Establishment and validation of nomogram prediction model of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced thrombocytopenia / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To explore the predictive factors of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced thrombocytopenia in adult inpatients， and to establish and validate the nomogram prediction model. METHODS Data of adult inpatients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam in Xi’an Central Hospital from Jun. 30th， 2021 to Jun. 30th， 2023 were retrospectively collected. The training set and internal validation set were randomly constructed in a 7∶3 ratio. Singler factor and multifactor Logistic regression analysis were used to screen the independent predictors of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced thrombocytopenia. The nomogram was drawn by using “RMS” of R 4.0.3 software， and the predictive performance of the model was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve and C-index curve. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to evaluate the calibration degree of the model. Using the same standard， the clinical data of hospitalized patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam in Xi’an First Hospital in the same period were collected for external validation of the nomogram prediction model. RESULTS A total of 1 045 patients in Xi’an Central Hospital were included in this study， among which 67 patients suffered from cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced thrombocytopenia， with an incidence of 6.41%. After the false positive patients were excluded， 473 patients were included finally， including 331 in the training set and 142 in theinternal validation set. Multifactor Logistic regression analysis showed that age [OR＝1.043， 95%CI （1.017， 1.070）]， estimated glomerular filtration rate （eGFR） [OR＝0.988，95%CI（0.977， 0.998）]， baseline platelet （PLT） [OR＝0.989， 95%CI（0.982， 0.996）]， nutritional risk [OR＝3.863， 95%CI（1.884， 7.921）] and cumulative defined daily doses （DDDs） [OR＝1.082， 95%CI（1.020， 1.147）] were independent predictors for cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced thrombocytopenia （P＜0.05）. The C-index values of the training set and the internal validation set were 0.824 [95%CI （0.759， 0.890）] and 0.828 [95%CI （0.749， 0.933）]， respectively. The results of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that χ 2 values were 0.441 （P＝0.802） and 1.804 （P＝0.406）. In the external validation set， the C-index value was 0.808 [95%CI （0.672， 0.945）]， the χ 2 value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was 0.899 （P＝0.638）. CONCLUSIONS The independent predictors of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced thrombocytopenia include age， baseline PLT， eGFR， nutritional risk and cumulative DDDs. The model has good predictive efficacy and extrapolation ability， which can help clinic identify the potential risk of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced thrombocytopenia quickly and accurately.

Study on the risk factors of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced coagulation dysfunction in adult patients：a systematic review / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the risk factors for cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced coagulation dysfunction in adult patients. METHODS Retrieved from CNKI， VIP， CBM， Wanfang data， PubMed， Embase and Cochrane Library， randomized controlled trial （RCT）， case-control study or cohort study about cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced coagulation dysfunction in adult patients were collected from the inception to Apr. 30th， 2023. After literature screening， data extraction and quality evaluation， meta-analysis was carried out by using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS A total of 13 studies were included， among which 11 studies were case-control studies， and 2 studies were cohort studies， involving 18 387 patients in total. Meta- analysis showed that the proportion of advanced age [OR＝2.04， 95%CI （1.14， 3.64）， P＝0.02]， liver insufficiency [OR＝5.95， 95%CI （4.21， 8.40）， P＜0.000 01]， renal insufficiency [OR＝3.51， 95%CI （3.04， 4.05）， P＜0.001]， hypoproteinemia [OR＝ 1.90， 95%CI（1.37， 2.62）， P＜0.001]， poor diet [OR＝7.25， 95%CI （5.13， 10.24）， P＜0.000 01]， daily dose of cefoperazone/ sulbactam ≥9 g [OR＝3.95， 95%CI （2.45，6.37）， P＜0.001]， medication duration of cefoperazone/sulbactam ≥10 d [OR＝2.43， 95%CI （1.81， 3.28）， P＜0.001]， combined use of anticoagulant drugs [OR＝2.84， 95%CI （2.03， 3.97）， P＜0.001]， combined with malignant tumor [OR＝1.60， 95%CI （1.20， 2.15），P＜0.001] in patients with abnormal coagulation function were significantly higher than those with normal coagulation function. CONCLUSIONS Advanced age， liver insufficiency， renal insufficiency， complicated with malignant tumors and hypoalbuminemia， combined use of anticoagulant drugs， poor diet， daily dose ≥9 g， and medication duration≥10 days are risk factors for coagulation dysfunction caused by cefoperazone/sulbactam.

A case of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica septicemia. / 脑膜脓毒性伊丽莎白金菌败血症一例.

A 82-year-old man was admitted to hospital with fever, unresponsiveness, elevated hypersensitive C-reactive protein and neutrophile granulocyte. Ceftriaxone was administrated by intravenous dripping in the emergency room, but the effect was not satisfactory. Following his admission to the ward, cefoperazone sulbactam were given. Elizabethkingia meningoseptica was identified by blood culture and further confirmed by 16S rRNA sequencing. The lumbar puncture showed that cerebrospinal fluid pressure was 80 mmH2O (1 mmH2O=0.0098 kPa) and biochemical results were normal. After 11 days of cefoperazone sulbactam treatment, the patient was discharged with negative blood culture. The hypersensitive C-reactive protein and neutrophile granulocyte had also declined. The patient received levofloxacin tablets for anti-infection treatment for 14 d after discharge. No signs of infection were observed in three months' following up.

Risk Factors for Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Induced Coagulation Disorder.

Purpose: Cefoperazone/sulbactam is a ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination effective against intra-abdominal, urinary tract, and respiratory infections. Although some studies have suggested that cefoperazone/sulbactam is associated with coagulation disorders, it remains debatable whether the combination of cefoperazone/sulbactam with tigecycline or valproic acid increases the risk of bleeding, as both drugs can lead to coagulation disorders. This study aimed to explore the risk factors of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced coagulopathy. Patients and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, nested case-control study. The sample groups were derived from individuals registered at the Department of Neurosurgery, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for demographic data. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the matched odds ratios representing the odds of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced coagulopathy (CIC), and a receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off conditions. Results: After PSM, 155 and 56 patients were included in the control and case groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that advanced age, treatment duration, and total dose were independent risk factors of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced coagulation disorders. Concomitant use of vitamin K was an independent protective factor against CIC. The optimal cut-off for the length of treatment was 5 d, and the cut-off for the total dose was 48 g. Conclusion: Tigecycline and valproic acid were not associated with CIC. Advanced age and long treatment duration are risk factors for CIC. Supplementation with vitamin K during cefoperazone/sulbactam treatment was associated with a reduced risk.

Screening for Metallo-Beta-Lactamases Using Non-Carbapenem Agents: Effective Detection of MBL-Producing Enterobacterales and Differentiation of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales.

Metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) are enzymes that break down carbapenem antibiotics, leading to carbapenem-resistant organisms. Carbapenemase-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is one of them. Outbreaks of CRE infection can occur in healthcare facilities and lead to increased deaths, illness, and medical costs. This study was conducted to detect MBLs using non-carbapenem agents and exclude MBLs among CRE isolates. A total of 3776 non-duplicate sequential Enterobacterales isolates from a single facility were screened between January 2019 and December 2022 using non-carbapenem agents, ceftazidime and cefoperazone/sulbactam. Positive 153 isolates (4.0%) were further tested using carbapenemase-confirmation tests and verified through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Fifteen imipenemase (IMP)-type MBL-producing Enterobacterales (0.4%) including one susceptible to carbapenems were identified. Moreover, 160 isolates (4.2%) meeting the criteria for CRE were directly subjected to PCR testing. All fourteen CRE isolates with MBLs identified through PCR testing were found to be the same strains screened using ceftazidime and cefoperazone/sulbactam. Screening using ceftazidime and cefoperazone/sulbactam can effectively detect MBL-producing Enterobacterales strains. This screening method showed comparable results to screening with meropenem, potentially serving as a supplementary approach and contributing to differentiating between MBL- and non-MBL-producing CRE strains. Our findings support these screening methods, particularly in regions where IMP-type MBLs are prevalent.

Comparison of bleeding risk and hypofibrinogenemia-associated risk factors between tigecycline with cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy and other tigecycline-based combination therapies.

Background: Tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam can cause coagulation disorders; tigecycline may also lead to hypofibrinogenemia, raising safety concerns. This study aimed to investigate whether tigecycline plus cefoperazone/sulbactam increases the risk of bleeding compared with other tigecycline-based combination therapies and identify risk factors for tigecycline-associated hypofibrinogenemia. Methods: In this multi-method, multicenter, retrospective study, coagulation and other baseline variables were compared using a cohort study, and risk factors for hypofibrinogenemia using a case-control study. Results: The 451 enrolled participants were divided into three group: tigecycline plus cefoperazone/sulbactam (Group A, 193 patients), tigecycline plus carbapenems (Group B, 200 patients) and tigecycline plus ß-lactams without N-methylthio-tetrazole (NMTT) side chains (Group C, 58 patients). Activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time were prolonged, and fibrinogen declined for all patients after tigecycline-based medication (all p < 0.05). Prothrombin time in Group B was significantly longer than in other groups (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in bleeding events between the three groups (p = 0.845). Age greater than 80 years (OR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.07-7.60), treatment duration (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.19-1.41), daily dose (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.29-5.25), total bilirubin (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02) and basal fibrinogen (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.14-1.63) were independent risk factors of hypofibrinogenemia. The optimal cut-off for treatment course was 6 days for high-dose and 11 days for low-dose. Conclusion: Tigecycline plus cefoperazone/sulbactam did not increase the risk of bleeding compared with tigecycline plus carbapenem, or tigecycline plus ß-lactam antibiotics without NMTT-side-chains. Coagulation function should be closely monitored in patients receiving tigecycline treatment.

Risk-factor analysis and predictive-model development of acute kidney injury in inpatients administered cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium and mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium: a single-center retrospective study.

Objective: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common adverse reaction observed with the clinical use of cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium and mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium. Based upon real-world data, we will herein determine the risk factors associated with AKI in inpatients after receipt of these antimicrobial drugs, and we will develop predictive models to assess the risk of AKI. Methods: Data from all adult inpatients who used cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium and mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium at the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University between January 2018 and December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The data were collected through the inpatient electronic medical record (EMR) system and included general information, clinical diagnosis, and underlying diseases, and logistic regression was exploited to develop predictive models for the risk of AKI. The training of the model strictly adopted 10-fold cross-validation to validate its accuracy, and model performance was evaluated employing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the areas under the curve (AUCs). Results: This retrospective study comprised a total of 8767 patients using cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium, of whom 1116 developed AKI after using the drug, for an incidence of 12.73%. A total of 2887 individuals used mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium, of whom 265 developed AKI after receiving the drug, for an incidence of 9.18%. In the cohort administered cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium, 20 predictive factors (p < 0.05) were applied in constructing our logistic predictive model, and the AUC of the predictive model was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.82-0.84). In the cohort comprising mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium use, nine predictive factors were determined by multivariate analysis (p < 0.05), and the AUC of the predictive model was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.71-0.77). Conclusion: The incidence of AKI induced by cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium and mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium in hospitalized patients may be related to the combined treatment of multiple nephrotoxic drugs and a past history of chronic kidney disease. The AKI-predictive model based on logistic regression showed favorable performance in predicting the AKI of adult in patients who received cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium or mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium.

Assessment of Effective Antimicrobial Regimens and Mortality-Related Risk Factors for Bloodstream Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the clinical features, risk factors, and effective antimicrobial therapy for Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bloodstream infection (BSI). Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data from patients with CRAB bacteremia in a Chinese tertiary hospital between January 2012 and October 2021. Risk factors, predictors of 30-day mortality, and effective antimicrobial therapy for CRAB BSI were identified using logistic and cox regression analyses. Results: Data from 276 patients with Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) BSI were included, of whom 157 (56.9%) had CRAB BSI. The risk factors that were significantly associated with CRAB BSI included previous intensive care unit (ICU) stay (P < 0.001), immunocompromised status (P < 0.001), cephalosporin use (P = 0.014), and fluoroquinolone use (P = 0.007). The 30-day mortality of the CRAB BSI group was 49.7% (78/157). ICU stay after BSI (P = 0.047), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score ≥10 (P < 0.001), and multiple organ failure (MOF) (P = 0.037) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Among antibiotic strategies for the treatment of patients with CRAB BSI, we found that definitive regimens containing cefoperazone/sulbactam were superior to those without cefoperazone/sulbactam in reducing the 30-day mortality rate (25.4% vs 53.4%, P = 0.005). After propensity score matching, we observed a significant increase in the 30-day mortality (77.8%vs 33.3%, P = 0.036) in patients receiving tigecycline monotherapy compared to those receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy. The mortality rate of patients receiving tigecycline with cefoperazone/sulbactam was also higher than that of patients receiving cefoperazone-sulbactam monotherapy; however, the difference was not significant (28.6%vs 19.0%, P = 0.375). Conclusion: The severity of patient conditions was significantly associated with mortality in patients with CRAB BSI. Those Patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam had better clinical prognoses, and tigecycline should be used with caution.

Evaluation of Piperacillin/Sulbactam, Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Cefoperazone/Sulbactam Dosages in Gram-Negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections by Monte Carlo Simulation.

The optimal regimens of piperacillin/sulbactam (PIS 2:1), piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ 8:1), and cefoperazone/sulbactam (CSL 2:1) are not well defined in patients based on renal function. This study was conducted to identify optimal regimens of BLBLIs in these patients. The antimicrobial sensitivity test was performed by a two-fold agar dilution method. Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was used to simulate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for various dosing regimens in patients with different renal functions. For strains with an MIC ≤ 8/4 mg/L, PIS 4.5 g q6h achieved 99.03%PTA in the subset of patients with creatinine clearance (CrCL) > 90 mL/min. For patients with CrCL 60-90 mL/min, PIS 4.5 g q6h achieved 81.2% CFR; for those with CrCL 40-59 mL/min, PIS 4.5 g q8h achieved 80.25% CFR. However, for patients infected by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, PIS 4.5 g q6h achieved a CFR lower than 80%. For patients infected by A. baumannii with a CrCL of 31-60 mL/min, PIS 6.0 g q8h and 4.5 g q6h achieved 81.24% and 82.42% CFR, respectively. For those infected by P. aeruginosa, PIS 4.5 g q6h reached 90% CFR. PIS and PTZ achieved a similar CFR when piperacillin was at the same dose. The CFRs of CSL were much lower than those of the other two agents in Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa infections. The antibacterial spectrum of PIS is superior to that of PTZ and CSL. Higher dosages and dosing adjustment according to renal function should be considered to treat Gram-negative bacterial BSIs.

Comparison of different ratios of cefoperazone/sulbactam in patients with pyelonephritis.

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of different ratios of cefoperazone/sulbactam in the treatment of patients with pyelonephritis. Methods: In this retrospective study clinical records of patients with pyelonephritis treated in Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from July 2020 to July 2021 were collected,. It included 55 patients who received cefoperazone/sulbactam 2:1 treatment (Control group) and 57 patients who received 1 cefoperazone/sulbactam 1:1 treatment (Observation group). Clinical response, inflammatory reaction and bacterial clearance were compared between the two groups. Results: The levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8) and leukocyte count (WBC) in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total efficacy of the Observation-group was 92.98%, higher than 80.00% of the control group (P<0.05). Fifty-eight strains of bacteria were isolated from the Control-group and 59 strains from the Observation-group. The bacterial clearance rates were 65.52% (38/58) and 83.05% (49/59), respectively. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: The clinical efficacy of 1:1 ratio of cefoperazone/sulbactam in the treatment of patients with pyelonephritis was superior that of 2:1 ratio. This ratio allows to fully utilize the antibacterial effect of cefoperazone, with a significant decrease in inflammation markers and an improvement in bacterial clearance.

Case report: Cefoperazone-sulbactam induced Kounis syndrome and cardiogenic shock.

Background: Kounis syndrome is a hypersensitive coronary artery disease caused by the body's exposure to allergens, which is induced by various drugs and environmental factors. This entity has been described primarily in isolated case reports and case series. We report a case of type III Kounis syndrome caused by cefoperazone-sulbactam. Case presentation: A 79-year-old man who received an infusion of cefoperazone-sulbactam in Respiratory Department of our hospital for recurrent infections. 28 minutes later, he developed skin flushing of the trunk and extremities, soon followed by loss of consciousness and shock. With antianaphylaxis, pressor therapy, and fluid rehydration, the patient was admitted to the ICU for treatment. During which, he experienced recurrent ventricular fibrillation and a progressive increase in troponin I levels. The ECG of the patient showed that the ST segment elevation of lead II, III, avF, and V3R-V5R was 0.10-0.20 MV. An urgent coronary angiography showed an in-stent thrombosis in the middle part of the right coronary artery, occlusion of the distal flow with TIMI grade 0. The diagnosis was type III Kounis syndrome with cardiogenic shock. Despite aggressive treatment, the patient died on day 7 after ICU admission. Conclusion: Kunis syndrome is a life-threatening disease, and therefore allergic reactions in patients with a history of cephalosporin allergy and coronary stent implantation should be considered and treated promptly.

Cefoperazone-sulbactam and ornidazole for Gardnerella vaginalis bloodstream infection after cesarean section: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Gardnerella vaginalis (G. vaginalis) is a facultative anaerobic bacteria known to cause bloodstream infections. However, cases are very rare in clinics. There is very limited clinical experience in the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by G. vaginalis. Therefore, there is an urgent need for effective antibacterial drugs to treat patients with bloodstream infections caused by G. vaginalis. CASE SUMMARY: A woman who underwent a cesarean section presented with a sudden onset of high fever 1-d post-surgery. The blood cultures suggested an infection due to G. vaginalis, and treatment with cefoperazone-sulbactam was started. After 5 d of treatment, there was a decrease in the hemogram; however, the temperature and C-reactive protein levels remained high. Based on clinical experience and a review of literature, the treatment was modified to include ornidazole in combination with cefoperazone-sulbactam. Following a week of treatment, the temperature, hemogram and C-reactive protein levels returned to normal, and blood cultures turned negative, suggesting a therapeutic effect of the combination treatment. CONCLUSION: This case highlighted the effective use of cefoperazone-sulbactam combined with ornidazole for bloodstream infection caused by G. vaginalis following a cesarean section.

Model-Informed Drug Development of New Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium Combination (3:1): Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis and Antibacterial Efficacy Against Enterobacteriaceae.

Objective: Cefoperazone/sulbactam is a commonly used antibiotic combination against the extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing bacteria. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new cefoperazone/sulbactam combination (3:1) for Enterobacteriaceae infection via model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches. Methods: Sulperazon [cefoperazone/sulbactam (2:1)] was used as a control. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data was collected from a clinical phase I trial. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using two-fold broth microdilution method. The percent time that the free drug concentration exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT>MIC) was used as the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indicator correlated with efficacy. Models were developed to characterize the PK profile of cefoperazone and sulbactam. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to determine the investigational regimens of cefoperazone/sulbactam (3:1) for the treatment of infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae based on the probability of target attainment (PTA) against the tested bacteria. Results: Two 2-compartment models were developed to describe the PK profiles of cefoperazone and sulbactam. Simulation results following the single-dose showed that the regimens of cefoperazone/sulbactam combinations in the ratios of 3:1 and 2:1 achieved similar PTA against the tested bacteria. Simulation results from the multiple-dose showed that the dosing regimen of cefoperazone/sulbactam (4 g, TID, 3 g:1 g) showed slightly better antibacterial effect than cefoperazone/sulbactam (6 g, BID, 4 g:2 g) against the Escherichia coli (ESBL-) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-). For the other tested bacteria, the above regimens achieved a similar PTA. Conclusions: Cefoperazone/sulbactam (3:1) showed similar bactericidal activity to sulperazon [cefoperazone/sulbactam (2:1)] against the tested bacteria. For the ESBL-producing and cefoperazone-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae, Cefoperazone/sulbactam (3:1) did not exhibit advantage as anticipated. Our study indicated that further clinical trials should be carried out cautiously to avoid the potential risks of not achieving the expected target.

In vitro activity of eravacycline and cefoperazone/ sulbactam against extensively-drug resistant and pan-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from a tertiary hospital in Greece.

We evaluated the in vitro activity of eravacycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam against 42 XDR and 58 PDR Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from blood and bronchoalveolar infections. The minimum and maximum MICs for eravacycline were 0.125 and 4 mg/L, respectively. The MIC50 was 2 mg/L and the MIC90 was 3 mg/L. The minimum and maximum MICs for cefoperazone/sulbactam were 24 and >256 mg/L, respectively. The MIC50 and MIC90 were both >256 mg/L. These novel agents were not adequate for the treatment of A. baumannii infections in our hospital and we recommend that mi- crobiology laboratories perform their own evaluations before including them in clinical practice.