A new methodology for determining the central pressure waveform from peripheral measurement using Fourier-based machine learning.

Radial applanation tonometry is a well-established technique for hemodynamic monitoring and is becoming popular in affordable non-invasive wearable healthcare electronics. To assess the central aortic pressure using radial-based measurements, there is an essential need to develop mathematical approaches to estimate the central pressure waveform. In this study, we propose a new Fourier-based machine learning (F-ML) methodology to transfer non-invasive radial pressure measurements to the central pressure waveform. To test the method, collection of tonometry recordings of the radial and carotid pressure measurements are used from the Framingham Heart Study (2640 individuals, 55 % women) with mean (range) age of 66 (40-91) years. Method-derived estimates are significantly correlated with the measured ones for three major features of the pressure waveform (systolic blood pressure, r=0.97, p < 0.001; diastolic blood pressure, r=0.99, p < 0.001; and mean blood pressure, r=0.99, p < 0.001). In all cases, the Bland-Altman analysis shows negligible bias in the estimations and error is bounded to 5.4 mmHg. Findings also suggest that the F-ML approach reconstructs the shape of the central pressure waveform accurately with the average normalized root mean square error of 5.5 % in the testing population which is blinded to all stages of machine learning development. The results show that the F-ML transfer function outperforms the conventional generalized transfer function, particularly in terms of reconstructing the shape of the central pressure waveform morphology. The proposed F-ML transfer function can provide accurate estimates for the central pressure waveform, and ultimately expand the usage of non-invasive devices for central hemodynamic assessment.

Validation of a Suprasystolic Cuff System for Static and Dynamic Representation of the Central Pressure Waveform.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive pulse waveform analysis is valuable for central cardiovascular assessment, yet controversies persist over its validity in peripheral measurements. Our objective was to compare waveform features from a cuff system with suprasystolic blood pressure hold with an invasive aortic measurement. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study analyzed data from 88 subjects undergoing concurrent aortic catheterization and brachial pulse waveform acquisition using a suprasystolic blood pressure cuff system. Oscillometric blood pressure (BP) was compared with invasive aortic systolic BP and diastolic BP. Association between cuff and catheter waveform features was performed on a set of 15 parameters inclusive of magnitudes, time intervals, pressure-time integrals, and slopes of the pulsations. The evaluation covered both static (subject-averaged values) and dynamic (breathing-induced fluctuations) behaviors. Peripheral BP values from the cuff device were higher than catheter values (systolic BP-residual, 6.5 mm Hg; diastolic BP-residual, 12.4 mm Hg). Physiological correction for pressure amplification in the arterial system improved systolic BP prediction (r2=0.83). Dynamic calibration generated noninvasive BP fluctuations that reflect those invasively measured (systolic BP Pearson R=0.73, P<0.001; diastolic BP Pearson R=0.53, P<0.001). Static and dynamic analyses revealed a set of parameters with strong associations between catheter and cuff (Pearson R>0.5, P<0.001), encompassing magnitudes, timings, and pressure-time integrals but not slope-based parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the device and methods for peripheral waveform measurements presented here can be used for noninvasive estimation of central BP and a subset of aortic waveform features. These results serve as a benchmark for central cardiovascular assessment using suprasystolic BP cuff-based devices and contribute to preserving system dynamics in noninvasive measurements.

24-h central pressure is a valuable predictor for left ventricular hypertrophy in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease.

The current research on the relationship between 24-h central pressure and 24-h brachial pressure with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is characterised by limited sample size and inconsistent findings. Furthermore, the association has never been explored in chronic kidney disease (CKD). A multicentre, cross-sectional study among non-dialysis patients with CKD was conducted. All participants underwent brachial and central ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using MobilO-Graph PWA, while trained cardiologists performed echocardiography. In this study, 2117 non-dialysis patients with CKD were examined. 24-h central systolic blood pressure with c2 calibration (24-h c2SBP) demonstrated a stronger association with left ventricular mass index and LVH compared with 24-h brachial systolic blood pressure (24-h bSBP) in the univariate and multivariate regression analyses. The multivariate net reclassification index (NRI) analysis revealed that 24-h c2SBP exhibited greater discriminatory power over 24-h bSBP (NRI = 0.310, 95% CI [0.192-0.429], P < 0.001). Applying 130/135 mmHg as the threshold for 24-h bSBP/c2SBP to cross-classify, the patients were divided into concordant normotension (1509 individuals), isolated brachial hypertension (155 individuals), isolated central hypertension (11 individuals), and concordant hypertension (442 individuals). With concordant normotension as the reference, the multivariable-adjusted ORs were 0.954 (95% CI, 0.534-1.640; P = 0.870) for isolated brachial hypertension and 2.585 (95%CI, 1.841-3.633; P < 0.001) for concordant hypertension. Among non-dialysis patients with CKD, 24-h c2SBP exhibits greater efficacy in identifying the presence of LVH compared with 24-h bSBP. The presence of LVH was greater in cases of concordant hypertension compared with cases of isolated brachial hypertension and concordant normotension.

Short-term vascular responses to spring and fall daylight savings time shifts.

Daylight saving time (DST) is a Western biannual time transition, setting the clock back 1 h in the fall and forward 1 h in the spring. There is an epidemiological link between DST and acute myocardial infarction risk in the first week following the spring shift; however, the mechanisms underlying the effect of DST on cardiovascular function remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to explore the short-term cardiovascular changes induced by fall and spring shifts in DST in a convenience sample of healthy adults. We hypothesized that spring, but not fall, DST shifts would acutely increase central pulse wave velocity, the gold standard measurement of central arterial stiffness. Twenty-one individuals (fall: n = 10; spring: n = 11) participated in four visits, occurring 1 wk before and at +1, +3, and +5 days after spring and fall time transitions. Central, brachial, and radial pulse wave velocity as well as carotid augmentation index were assessed with applanation tonometry. Sleep quality and memory function were assessed via questionnaire and the Mnemonic Similarities Task, respectively. Neither fall or spring transition resulted in changes to cardiovascular variables (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, carotid-brachial pulse wave velocity, carotid-radial pulse wave velocity, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, or augmentation index), sleep quality, or cognitive function (all P > 0.05). Our findings do not provide evidence that DST shifts influence cardiovascular outcomes in healthy adults. This study emphasizes the need for further research to determine the mechanisms of increased cardiovascular disease risk with DST that help explain epidemiological trends.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The debate of whether to abolish daylight savings time (DST) is, in part, motivated by the population-level increase in all-cause mortality and incidence of cardiovascular events following DST; however, there is an absence of data to support a physiological basis for risk. We found no changes in pulse wave velocity or augmentation index during the subacute window of DST. Large multisite trials are necessary to address the small, but meaningful, effects brought on by a societal event.

Non-Invasive Estimation of Central Systolic Blood Pressure by Radial Tonometry: A Simplified Approach.

BACKROUND: Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) provides valuable clinical and physiological information. A recent invasive study showed that cSBP can be reliably estimated from mean (MBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure. In this non-invasive study, we compared cSBP calculated using a Direct Central Blood Pressure estimation (DCBP = MBP2/DBP) with cSBP estimated by radial tonometry. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for cardiovascular assessment and prevention were prospectively included. Using applanation tonometry with SphygmoCor device, cSBP was estimated using an inbuilt generalized transfer function derived from radial pressure waveform, which was calibrated to oscillometric brachial SBP and DBP. The time-averaged MBP was calculated from the radial pulse waveform. The minimum acceptable error (DCBP-cSBP) was set at ≤5 (mean) and ≤8 mmHg (SD). RESULTS: We included 160 patients (58 years, 54%men). The cSBP was 123.1 ± 18.3 mmHg (range 86-181 mmHg). The (DCBP-cSBP) error was -1.4 ± 4.9 mmHg. There was a linear relationship between cSBP and DCBP (R2 = 0.93). Forty-seven patients (29%) had cSBP values ≥ 130 mmHg, and a DCBP value > 126 mmHg exhibited a sensitivity of 91.5% and specificity of 94.7% in discriminating this threshold (Youden index = 0.86; AUC = 0.965). CONCLUSIONS: Using the DCBP formula, radial tonometry allows for the robust estimation of cSBP without the need for a generalized transfer function. This finding may have implications for risk stratification.

Relationship of Arterial Stiffness and Central Hemodynamics With Cardiovascular Risk In Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is becoming a serious public health problem and noninvasive estimation of central hemodynamics and artery stiffness have been identified as important predictors of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: The study included 4,311 participants, both sex and aged between 20 and 79 years. Arterial velocity pulse index, arterial pressure-volume index (AVI, API, and the index of artery stiffness), central systolic blood pressure, central artery pulse pressure (CSBP, CAPP, and estimated via oscillometric blood pressure monitor), and 10-year risk score of cardiovascular disease in China (China-PAR) and Framingham cardiovascular risk score (FCVRS) were assessed at baseline. Regression model was performed to identify factors associated with high cardiovascular disease risk stratification. The relationships between CSBP, CAPP and China-PAR, and FCVRS were analyzed by restrictive cubic spline functions. RESULTS: The uncontrolled hypertension group showed the highest values of AVI, API, CSBP, and CAPP. In the regression analysis, CAPP and hypertension subtypes were identified as significant predictors of high cardiovascular risk stratification, and CAPP was strongly correlated with API in this cohort. Finally, CSBP and CAPP showed significant J-shaped relationships with China-PAR and FCVRS. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with uncontrolled hypertension present with elevated values of CAPP, CSBP, API, AVI, China-PAR, and FCVRS scores. CAPP was independently associated with high cardiovascular risk stratification, and there was a significant J-shaped relationship with China-PAR and FCVRS that may identify people with higher cardiovascular risk.

Prediction of Cardiovascular Events by Pulse Waveform Parameters: Analysis of CARTaGENE.

Background Waveform parameters provide approximate data about aortic wave reflection. However, their association with cardiovascular events remains controversial and their role in cardiovascular prediction is unknown. Methods and Results We analyzed participants aged between 40 and 69 from the population-based CARTaGENE cohort. Baseline pulse wave analysis (central pulse pressure, augmentation index) and wave separation analysis (forward pressure, backward pressure, reflection magnitude) parameters were derived from radial artery tonometry. Associations between each parameter and major adverse atherosclerotic events (MACE; cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction) were obtained using adjusted Cox models. The incremental predictive value of each parameter compared with the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease score alone was assessed using hazard ratios, c-index differences, continuous net reclassification indexes, and integrated discrimination indexes. From 17 561 eligible patients, 2315 patients had a MACE during a median follow-up of 10.1 years. Central pulse pressure, forward pressure, and backward pressure, but not augmentation index and reflection magnitude, were significantly associated with MACE after full adjustment. All parameters except forward pressure statistically improved MACE prediction compared with the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease score alone. The greatest prediction improvement was seen with augmentation index and reflection magnitude but remained small in magnitude. These 2 parameters enhanced predictive performance more strongly in patients with low baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease scores. Up to 5.7% of individuals were reclassified into a different risk stratum by adding waveform parameters to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease scores. Conclusions Some waveform parameters are independently associated with MACEs in a population-based cohort. Augmentation index and reflection magnitude slightly improve risk prediction, especially in patients at low cardiovascular risk.

Estimating Central Pulse Pressure From Blood Flow by Identifying the Main Physical Determinants of Pulse Pressure Amplification.

Several studies suggest that central (aortic) blood pressure (cBP) is a better marker of cardiovascular disease risk than peripheral blood pressure (pBP). The morphology of the pBP wave, usually assessed non-invasively in the arm, differs significantly from the cBP wave, whose direct measurement is highly invasive. In particular, pulse pressure, PP (the amplitude of the pressure wave), increases from central to peripheral arteries, leading to the so-called pulse pressure amplification (ΔPP). The main purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for estimating central PP (cPP) from non-invasive measurements of aortic flow and peripheral PP. Our novel approach is based on a comprehensive understanding of the main cardiovascular properties that determine ΔPP along the aortic-brachial arterial path, namely brachial flow wave morphology in late systole, and vessel radius and distance along this arterial path. This understanding was achieved by using a blood flow model which allows for workable analytical solutions in the frequency domain that can be decoupled and simplified for each arterial segment. Results show the ability of our methodology to (i) capture changes in cPP and ΔPP produced by variations in cardiovascular properties and (ii) estimate cPP with mean differences smaller than 3.3 ± 2.8 mmHg on in silico data for different age groups (25-75 years old) and 5.1 ± 6.9 mmHg on in vivo data for normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Our approach could improve cardiovascular function assessment in clinical cohorts for which aortic flow wave data is available.

Pressão arterial central e risco cardiovascular / Central blood pressure and cardiovascular risk

Pressão Central, como o nome indica, é uma medida hemodinâmica semelhante a pressão arterial convencional porém avaliada de forma indireta por equipamento especifico, que avalia estes parâmetros na saída do sangue na raiz da aorta. Esta medida tem uma maior confiabilidade pois prediz de forma mais acurada os riscos de adoecimento e morte cardiovascular. Isto ocorre, pois a a onda de pulso (OP) ao percorrer os trajetos arteriais sofrem ampliações e importantes modificações no seu contorno deformando o valor original. Embora seja mais precisa em valores, ainda não é usado de rotina na pratica clinica por razoes de custos dos seus equipamentos e provavelmente por exigir habilidades maiores que as medidas captadas pelo equipamentos de mensuração periférica

Central pressure, as the name implies, is a hemodynamic measure similar to conventional blood pressure, but indirectly assessed by specific equipment, which evaluates these parameters at the blood outlet at the root of the aorta. This measure has greater confidence because it more accurately predicts the risks of cardiovascular disease and death. This occurs because the pulse wave (OP) when traversing the arterial paths provides enlargements and modifications in its contour, deforming the original value. Although it is more precise in terms of values, it is not yet routinely used in clinical practice for reasons of the cost of its equipment and probably because it requires greater needs than measures captured by peripheral measurement equipment

Relationship between fiducial points on the peripheral and central blood pressure waveforms: rate of rise of the central waveform is a determinant of peripheral systolic blood pressure.

Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP, the peak of the central waveform) is usually regarded as the determinant of peripheral systolic blood pressure with amplification of peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP) measured with reference to cSBP. However, the earlier portion of the central waveform up to the first systolic shoulder (P1) may be the major determinant of pSBP. We performed in silico simulation studies and examined previously acquired experimental data (n = 131) in which peripheral and central blood pressure waveforms had been acquired both invasively and noninvasively to examine the determinants of pSBP. Measurements were made at baseline and during perturbation of hemodynamics by inotropic and vasoactive drugs. In silico simulations using a central-to-peripheral transfer function demonstrated that pSBP is dependent on P1 and the rate of change (dP/dt) of central pressure up to the time of P1 but not cSBP. In computational simulations, peripheral reflection in the radial artery was closely related to dP/dt, and 97% of the variability in amplification as measured with reference to P1 was explained by dP/dt. In vivo, amplification of pSBP over P1 was correlated with dP/dt (R > 0.75, P < 0.0001 for all data sets), and P1 and dP/dt were independently correlated with pSBP, explaining 90% of the variability in pSBP. We conclude that P1 and dP/dt are major determinants of pSBP and that pSBP and cSBP are, in part, determined by different cardiac, central, and peripheral vascular properties.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Peripheral systolic BP is determined mainly by the first shoulder and the rate of rise of the central systolic blood pressure waveform rather than the peak of this waveform (central systolic BP). Peripheral and central systolic blood pressure are determined by different cardiac and vascular properties.

Testing a Patient-Specific In-Silico Model to Noninvasively Estimate Central Blood Pressure.

PURPOSE: To show some preliminary results about the possibility to exploit a cardiovascular mathematical model-made patient-specific by noninvasive data routinely measured during ordinary clinical examinations-in order to obtain sufficiently accurate central blood pressure (BP) estimates. METHODS: A closed-loop multiscale (0D and 1D) model of the cardiovascular system is made patient-specific by using as model inputs the individual mean heart rate and left-ventricular contraction time, weight, height, age, sex and mean/pulse brachial BPs. The resulting framework is used to determine central systolic, diastolic, mean and pulse pressures, which are compared with the beat-averaged invasive pressures of 12 patients aged 72 ± 6.61 years. RESULTS: Errors in central systolic, diastolic, mean and pulse pressures by the model are 4.26 ± 2.81, 5.86 ± 4.38, 4.98 ± 3.95 and 3.51±2.38 mmHg, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed modeling approach shows a good patient-specific response and appears to be potentially useful in clinical practice. However, this approach needs to be evaluated in a larger cohort of patients and could possibly be improved through more accurate oscillometric BP measurement methods.

A systematic review of invasive, high-fidelity pressure studies documenting the amplification of blood pressure from the aorta to the brachial and radial arteries.

It is commonly accepted that systolic blood pressure (SBP) is significantly higher in the brachial/radial artery than in the aorta while mean (MBP) and diastolic (DBP) pressures remain unchanged. This may have implications for outcome studies and for non-invasive devices calibration. We performed a systematic review of invasive high-fidelity pressure studies documenting BP in the aorta and brachial/radial artery. We selected articles published prior to July 2015. Pressure amplification (Amp = peripheral minus central pressure) was calculated (weighted mean). The six studies retained (n = 294, 76.5% male, mean age 63.5 years) mainly involved patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). In two studies at the aortic/brachial level (n = 64), MBP and DBP were unchanged (MPAmp = 0.1 mmHg, DPAmp = -1.3 mmHg), while SBP increased (SPAmp = 4.2 mmHg; relative amplification = 3.1%). In four studies in which MBP was not documented (n = 230), brachial DBP remained unchanged and SBP increased (SPAmp = 6.6 mmHg; 4.9%). One of these four studies also reported radial SBP and DBP, not MBP (n = 12). Few high-fidelity pressure studies were found, and they have been performed mainly in elderly male patients with suspected CAD. Counter to expectations, the mean amplification of SBP from the aorta to brachial artery was < 5%. Further studies on SPAmp phenotypes (positive, null, negative) are advocated. Non-invasive device calibration assumptions were confirmed, namely unchanged MBP and DBP from the aorta to the brachial artery. Data did not allow for firm conclusions on the amount of BP changes from the aorta to the radial artery, and from the aorta to the brachial/radial arteries in other populations.

Central Blood Pressure Waves Assessment: A Validation Study of Non-invasive Aortic Pressure Measurement in Human Beings.

INTRODUCTION: Measurement of central (aortic) systolic blood pressure has been shown to provide reliable information to evaluate target organ damage. However, non-invasive central blood pressure measurement procedures are still under analysis. AIM: To compare human pressure waveforms invasively obtained in the aorta, with the corresponding waveforms non-invasively recorded using an oscillometric device (Mobil-O-Graph). METHODS: In this research were included 20 subjects in which invasive percutaneous coronary interventions were performed. They were 10 males (68 ± 12 y. o. , BMI: 27.4 ± 4.6 kg/m2) and 10 females (77 ± 8 y. o. , BMI: 28.5 ± 5.3 kg/m2). During the invasive aortic pressure recording, a synchronized non-invasive Mobil-O-Graph acquisition beat by beat and reconstructed central pressure wave was performed. Both, invasive and non-invasive pressure waves were digitized and stored for subsequent analysis and calculations. A computerized interpolation procedure was developed in our laboratory to compare these pressure waves. RESULTS: A significant correlation between Mobil-O-Graph central blood pressure measurements and the corresponding invasive values was found in males (r < 0.81; p < 0.01) and females (r < 0.93; p < 0.01). However, in both genders, the slope of the regression lines was lesser than 1 (males: y = 0.7354x + 18.998; females: y = 0.9835x + 2.8432). In the whole population (n = 20), a significant correlation between Mobil-O-Graph central blood pressure measurements and the corresponding invasive values was found (r < 0.89; p < 0.01) and the regression line was lesser than 1 (y = 0.9774x + 1.7603). CONCLUSIONS: In this research, a high correlation between invasive central blood pressure values and those measured with the Mobil-O-Graph device was found in males, females and the whole population. However, a sub estimation of Mobil-O-Graph central blood pressure values was observed.

Central hemodynamic characteristics of young adults with isolated systolic hypertension: an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring-based study of real-world clinical patients.

The central hemodynamic characteristics of young adults with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) remain controversial, particularly regarding the extent of pulse pressure amplification (PPamp) compared with that of normotensives (NTs). Given the lack of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM)-based data, this study evaluated 509 untreated young adults (18-35 years) who had undergone ABPM during the last decade, 109 who had undergone both ABPM and SphygmoCor analysis, and 26 newly recruited NTs. The agreement rate between office BP- and ABPM-based subtype classification was alarmingly low (50.7%). ISH was distinguishable from systolic-diastolic hypertension, the predominant subtype characterized by increased central BPs and stiffened arteries. The central hemodynamic parameters were all similar between patients with ISH and white-coat hypertension (WC). ISH patients had central BPs that were, albeit higher than those of NTs, at an upper-normal level that was comparable to those of WC patients. ISH patients had similar cfPWV but significantly higher PPamp than NTs (p = 0.032). The central hemodynamic parameters of the participants were further analyzed according to central pressure waveform types (A vs. B vs. C). Type C waves were associated with the highest PPamp and lowest cfPWV, whereas type A waves were associated with the lowest PPamp and highest cfPWV. Subjects with type B waves, an intermediate form, also had considerably high PPamps. Waveform composition differed significantly across hypertension subtypes (p < 0.001). ISH patients mostly had type B or C waves (96.7%), with only 3.3% having type A waves. This study based on a refined diagnosis showed that the ambulatory ISH of young adults arises from highly elastic arteries and related robustness of PPamp and shares similar central hemodynamic characteristics with WC patients.

Estimation of central arterial pressure from the radial artery in patients undergoing invasive neuroradiological procedures.

BACKGROUNDS: Central arterial pressure can be derived from analysis of the peripheral artery waveform. The aim of this study was to compare central arterial pressures measured from an intra-aortic catheter with peripheral radial arterial pressures and with central arterial pressures estimated from the peripheral pressure wave using a pressure recording analytical method (PRAM). METHODS: We studied 21 patients undergoing digital subtraction cerebral angiography under local or general anesthesia and equipped with a radial arterial catheter. A second catheter was placed in the ascending aorta for central pressure wave acquisition. Central (AO) and peripheral (RA) arterial waveforms were recorded simultaneously by PRAM for 90-180 s. During an off-line analysis, AO pressures were reconstructed (AOrec) from the RA trace using a mathematical model obtained by multi-linear regression analysis. The AOrec values obtained by PRAM were compared with the true central pressure value obtained from the catheter placed in the ascending aorta. RESULTS: Systolic, diastolic and mean pressures ranged from 79 to 180 mmHg, 47 to 102 mmHg, and 58 to 128 mmHg, respectively, for AO, and 83 to 174 mmHg, 47 to 107 mmHg, and 60 to 129 mmHg, respectively, for RA. The correlation coefficients between AO and RA were 0.86 (p < 0.01), 0.83 (p < 0.01) and 0.86 (p < 0.01) for systolic, diastolic and mean pressures, respectively, and the mean differences - 0.3 mmHg, 2.4 mmHg and 1.5 mmHg. The correlation coefficients between AO and AOrec were 0.92 (p < 0.001), 0.87 (p < 0.001) and 0.92 (p < 0.001), for systolic, diastolic and mean pressures, respectively, and the mean differences 0.01 mmHg, 1.8 mmHg and 1.2 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: PRAM can provide reliable estimates of central arterial pressure.

Biomarkers of cardiovascular risk across phenotypes of osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to explore the associations between ultrasonographic and radiographic joint scores and levels of arterial CVD risk markers in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Secondly, to compare the levels of arterial CVD risk markers between OA phenotypes and controls. METHOD: The "Musculoskeletal pain in Ullensaker" Study (MUST) invited residents of Ullensaker municipality with self-reported OA to a medical examination. OA was defined according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and phenotyped based on joint distribution. Joints of the hands, hips and knees were examined by ultrasonography and conventional radiography, and scored for osteosteophytes. Hands were also scored for inflammation by grey scale (GS) synovitis and power Doppler (PD) signal. Control populations were a cohort of inhabitants of Oslo (OCP), and for external validation, a UK community-based register (UKPC).Pulse pressure augmentation index (AIx) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were measured using the Sphygmocor apparatus (Atcor®). Ankel-brachial index (ABI) was estimated in a subset of patients. In separate adjusted regression models we explored the associations between ultrasonography and radiograph joint scores and AIx, PWV and ABI. CVD risk markers were also compared between phenotypes of OA and controls in adjusted analyses. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty six persons with OA were included (mean age (range); 63.0 (42.0-75.0)), (females (%); 264 (72)). Of these, 155 (42.3%) had isolated hand OA, 111 (30.3%) had isolated lower limb OA and 100 (27.3%) had generalized OA. 108 persons were included in the OCP and 963 persons in the UKPC; (mean age (range); OCP: 57.2 (40.4-70.4), UKPC: 63.9 (40.0-75.0), females (%); OCP: 47 (43.5), UKPC: 543 (56.4%). Hand osteophytes were associated with AIx while GS and PD scores were not related to CVD risk markers. All OA phenotypes had higher levels of AIx compared to OCP in adjusted analyses. External validation against UKPC confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Hand osteophytes might be related to higher risk of CVD. People with OA had higher augmented central pressure compared to controls.Words 330.

Age-Associated Differences in Central Artery Responsiveness to Sympathoexcitatory Stimuli.

BACKGROUND: Age-associated arterial stiffening may be the result of greater tonic sympathetic nerve activity. However, age-associated changes in central artery responsiveness to sympathoexcitatory stimuli are understudied. Therefore, we examined changes in central artery stiffness and wave reflection in response to sympathoexcitatory stimuli in young and older adults. METHODS: Fourteen young (25 ± 4 years) and 15 older (68 ± 4 years) subjects completed 3 minutes of the cold pressor test (CPT) and lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) separated by 15 minutes. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), central augmentation pressure (cAP), and augmentation index (AIx) were measured in duplicate during rest and the final minute of each perturbation. RESULTS: Young subjects had lower baseline cfPWV, cAP, and AIx than older subjects (P < 0.05 for all). During the CPT mean arterial pressure (MAP), cfPWV, cAP, and AIx increased in both groups (P < 0.05 for all); however, changes (Δ) in MAP (18 ± 7 vs. 9 ± 5 mm Hg), cfPWV (1.3 ± 0.7 vs. 0.6 ± 0.9 m/s), cAP (4 ± 2 vs. 6 ± 3 mm Hg), and AIx (18 ± 9% vs. 7 ± 4%) were greater in young vs. older subjects, respectively (P < 0.05 for all). With MAP as a covariate, cfPWV, cAP, and AIx responses to the CPT were no longer significantly different between groups. During LBNP, changes in MAP (-1 ± 3 vs. -3 ± 5 mm Hg), cfPWV (0.5 ± 0.3 vs. 0.5 ± 0.7 m/s), cAP (-2 ± 2 vs. -2 ± 3 mm Hg), and AIx (-7 ± 7% vs. -3 ± 6%) were similar between young and older groups, respectively (P > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our data suggest the sympathetic nervous system may directly modulate central hemodynamics and that age-associated differences in central artery responsiveness to sympathoexcitatory stimuli are largely attributable to differential blood pressure responses.

Quantitative Vascular Evaluation: From Laboratory Experiments to Point-of-Care Patient (Clinical Approach).

To enhance the efficiency of patient-specific risk stratification and diagnosis, an assessment of arterial structural and functional changes associated to a vascular disease in both early and advanced stages have been proposed, with the objective of limiting the progression or revert vascular alterations. In this connection, an interdisciplinary international partnership made up by research institutions from France, Argentina, Uruguay and Spain was established, with the objective of contributing to the evaluation and follow-up of factors involved in the physiopathology of cardiometabolic diseases and human aging. Several studies, such as the effect of hypertension in large arteries, alterations in arterial wall viscosity, stiffness and inertia, endothelial function and vascular reactivity, cardiovascular risk improvement, vascular age assessment and cryografts vascular response evaluation were carried out as a result of this international collaboration during the last twenty-five years.

Failure analyses of unconfined CCWBM body in uniaxial compression based on central pressure variation.

Cemented coal waste backfill material (CCWBM) is made of coal gangue, fly ash and cementitious materials. It has been widely used in the field of backfill mining to control surface subsidence and protect the environment. A large number of unconfined backfill bodies without lateral support are formed in partial backfill mining. To study the failure characteristics of unconfined CCWBM body in partial backfill, the stress-strain curves of the CCWBM were obtained by uniaxial compression tests at different ages (1-28 d). The central pressure was measured by the embedded pressure sensors. The failure characteristics of the specimen were monitored by acoustic emission (AE) positioning technique. Three observations can be made. 1. The central pressure variation curves lag behind the mean stress change curves. The central pressure curve can be divided into three stages: slow increase stage, rapid growth stage and decline stage. It has two pressure manifestations: early appearance and peak appearance. They can be as the failure precursor and instability critical, respectively. 2. The specimen forms a central elastic bearing area in the process of compression. The plastic area develops to the inner side with the increase of pressure, and an upper and lower compound cone-shaped residual area is finally formed. 3. The embedded pressure sensor can be used to monitor the instability of the unconfined backfill body. The research results can provide guidance for the in-situ stability monitoring and reinforcement of unconfined CCWBM body in partial backfill.

Central systolic blood pressure and aortic stiffness response to dietary sodium in young and middle-aged adults.

High dietary sodium intake can lead to hypertension and increased incidence of cardiovascular disease. We sought to determine the effect of short-term dietary sodium loading on central blood pressure and arterial stiffness in young (YG; 22-40 years) and middle-aged (MA; 41-60 years) normotensive adults. YG (n = 49; age: 27 ± 1 years) and MA (n = 36; age: 52 ± 1 years) subjects were randomized, in a cross-over design, to 7 days of low-sodium (LS; 20 mmol/d) or high-sodium (HS; 300 mmol/d) diet. On the last day of each diet, central pressures, forward and reflected wave amplitudes (via radial artery applanation tonometry), and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity were assessed. Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) was greater after HS in both YG (LS: 96 ± 1 vs. HS: 99 ± 1 mm Hg; P = .012) and MA (LS: 106 ± 2 vs. HS: 115 ± 3 mm Hg; P < .001). However, the increase in cSBP was greater in MA (YG: 4 ± 1 vs. MA: 9 ± 2; P = .02). In MA subjects, HS elicited greater forward (LS: 25 ± 1 vs. HS: 29 ± 1 mm Hg; P < .001) and reflected (LS: 19 ± 1 vs. HS: 23 ± 1 mm Hg; P < .001) wave amplitudes. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was also greater in MA on HS but after adjustment for mean arterial pressure, the difference was no longer significant. Our data indicate that HS intake leads to a greater increase in cSBP in MA adults, which may be the result of increased forward and reflected wave amplitudes.