Bone morphogenetic protein in subaxial cervical arthrodesis: a meta-analysis of 5828 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Use of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-an osteoinductive agent commonly used in lumbar arthrodesis-is off-label for cervical arthrodesis. This study aimed to identify the effect of BMP use on clinical and radiological outcomes in instrumented cervical arthrodesis. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies directly comparing outcomes between cervical arthrodeses with and without using BMP. Outcomes were analyzed separately for cases of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusion (PCF). RESULTS: A total of 20 studies with 5828 patients (1948 with BMP and 3880 without BMP) were included. In the ACDF cases, BMP use was associated with higher fusion rates (98.9% vs 93.6%, risk difference [RD] 8%; risk ratio [RR] 1.12, p = 0.02), lower reoperation rates (2.2% vs 3.1%, RD 3%; RR 0.48, p = 0.04), and higher risk of dysphagia (24.7% vs 8.1%, RD 11%; RR 1.93, p = 0.02). No significant differences in the Neck Disability Index, neck pain, or arm pain scores were associated with the use of BMP. On subgroup meta-analysis of ACDF cases, older age (≥ 50 years) and higher BMP dose (≥ 0.9 mg/level) were associated with significantly higher fusion rates and relatively lower risk for dysphagia, whereas arthrodesis of fewer segments (< 2 levels) showed significantly higher dysphagia rates without a significant increase in fusion rates. In the PCF cases, the use of BMP was not associated with significant differences in fusion (p = 0.38) or reoperation (p = 0.61) rates but was associated with significantly higher blood loss during surgery (mean difference 146.7 ml, p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Use of BMP in ACDF offers higher rates of augmented fusion and lower rates of all-cause reoperation but with an increased risk of dysphagia. The benefit of fusion outweighs the risk of dysphagia with a higher BMP dose in older patients being operated on for < 2 levels. The use of BMP in PCF seems to have a less important effect on clinical and radiological outcomes.

Our experience with the surgical management of lower cervical spine fractures: fifty case series.

PURPOSE: Trauma to the lower cervical spine is a serious lesion due to its neurological consequences which jeopardize the vital and functional prognosis. They constitute a public health problem due to their frequency and seriousness requiring rapid and adequate treatment. The aim of our study is to (1) describe the epidemiological, clinical, and radiological characteristics of lower cervical spine trauma patients; (2) support the therapeutic management of these patients and show our experience in surgery for lower cervical spine trauma; and (3) analyze the anatomical and functional results and discuss them with literature data. METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive study of 50 patients with lower cervical spine trauma treated surgically over a period of five years from January 1, 2016, to December 2020. RESULTS: The average age of our patients was 34.5 years, with a sex ratio of 1.7. The etiologies are dominated by accidents on public roads (58%). They show neurological disorders such as spinal cord damage in 30% of cases and root damage in 20% of cases. The radiological assessment revealed eight tear drops, ten comminuted fractures, 12 severe sprains, 12 biarticular dislocations, six uniarticular dislocations, and two herniated discs. Treatment was surgical in all patients with an anterolateral approach and anterior arthrodesis. The evolution was favourable in 21 patients and stationary in 29 patients. CONCLUSION: Our study concluded that dislocations and fracture dislocations were the predominant type of injury in cases of AVP. Tetraplegia was mainly observed with uni- and biarticular dislocations. The variation in consolidation time was not correlated with trauma-to-surgery time. Better neurological recovery was observed with mild initial neurological damage than with initially severe damage. The appearance of an adjacent syndrome is less frequent with monosegmental arthrodesis than with multisegmental arthrodesis. Cage arthrodesis was an alternative to iliac harvesting with similar results.

Representativeness of the American Spine Registry: a comparison of patient characteristics with the National Inpatient Sample.

OBJECTIVE: The American Spine Registry (ASR) is a collaborative effort between the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The goal of this study was to evaluate how representative the ASR is of the national practice with spinal procedures, as recorded in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). METHODS: The authors queried the NIS and the ASR for cervical and lumbar arthrodesis cases performed during 2017-2019. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients undergoing cervical and lumbar procedures. The two groups were compared for the overall proportion of cervical and lumbar procedures, age distribution, sex, surgical approach features, race, and hospital volume. Outcomes available in the ASR, such as patient-reported outcomes and reoperations, were not analyzed due to nonavailability in the NIS. The representativeness of the ASR compared to the NIS was assessed via Cohen's d effect sizes, and absolute standardized mean differences (SMDs) of < 0.2 were considered trivial, whereas > 0.5 were considered moderately large. RESULTS: A total of 24,800 arthrodesis procedures were identified in the ASR for the period between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. During the same time period, 1,305,360 cases were recorded in the NIS. Cervical fusions comprised 35.9% of the ASR cohort (8911 cases) and 36.0% of the NIS cohort (469,287 cases). The two databases presented trivial differences in terms of patient age and sex for all years of interest across both cervical and lumbar arthrodeses (SMD < 0.2). Trivial differences were also noted in the distribution of open versus percutaneous procedures of the cervical and lumbar spine (SMD < 0.2). Among lumbar cases, anterior approaches were more common in the ASR than in the NIS (32.1% vs 22.3%, SMD = 0.22), but the discrepancy among cervical cases in the two databases was trivial (SMD = 0.03). Small differences were illustrated in terms of race, with SMDs < 0.5, and a more significant discrepancy was identified in the geographic distribution of participating sites (SMDs of 0.7 and 0.74 for cervical and lumbar cases, respectively). For both of these measures, SMDs in 2019 were smaller than those in 2018 and 2017. CONCLUSIONS: The ASR and NIS databases presented a very high similarity in proportions of cervical and lumbar spine surgeries, as well as similar distributions of age and sex, and distribution of open versus endoscopic approach. Slight discrepancies in anterior versus posterior approach among lumbar cases and patient race, and more significant discrepancies in geographic representation were also identified, yet decreasing trends in differences suggested the improving representativeness of the ASR over the course of time and its progressive growth. These conclusions are important to underline the external validity of quality investigations and research conclusions to be drawn from analyses in which the ASR is used.

Impact of cervical spine pathology on outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine pathology can affect the supporting muscles and function of the shoulder and contribute to shoulder and arm pain and hence may impact postoperative outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a history of cervical spine arthrodesis and its timing, before or after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), on the outcomes of TSA. Our hypothesis is that a history of cervical arthrodesis (CA) will negatively impact patient outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on a prospectively collected cohort at a single institution. Anatomic (aTSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) patients with CA were identified and compared to a cohort of patients without CA (NCA) enrolled in an institutional registry from 2011 to 2020. Demographic characteristics, diagnoses, implant type, range of motion, adverse events, and clinical outcome metric scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES], Constant, Shoulder Function score, patient satisfaction) were recorded. Outcomes between cohorts were analyzed using conventional statistics as well as stratification by minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) thresholds where applicable. RESULTS: Of the 573 TSAs evaluated, 48 (20a CA-aTSA and 28 CA-rTSA) had a history of CA and 525 (280 NCA-aTSA and 245 NCA-rTSA) had no history of CA. The CA-TSA (aTSA and rTSA) had lower Constant, ASES, and Shoulder Function scores postoperatively as well as less improvement in active external rotation and an overall lower satisfaction rating (P < .05 for all) compared with NCA-TSA. The adverse event rate in the CA-TSA cohort was higher compared with the NCA-TSA cohort (25% vs. 6.5% [rTSA; P = .004] and 24.5% vs. 11% [aTSA; P = .068]). Optimal cutoff analysis showed that a time from CA to TSA of greater than 1.33 years had a sensitivity of 75.0% and specificity of 75.0% in predicting achievement of SCB for ASES score. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates that patients with a history of CA undergoing shoulder arthroplasty results in lower postoperative functional outcomes, lower satisfaction, and higher rates of postoperative adverse events requiring surgical revision when compared to a cohort without a history of CA. Additionally, the current study demonstrates that a time interval of at least 16 months between CA and shoulder arthroplasty optimizes the chances of achieving SCB for ASES score.

Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Hybrid Surgery and Fusion Application with Peek Cage in Patients Undergoing Three-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare patients with degenerative cervical disc herniation (CDH) who had undergone three-level anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) and fusion with a peek cage supported by synthetic bone graft in all levels to the cases with CDH with hybrid surgery (HS) regarding their radiological findings and surgical results. Materials and Methods: The patients who had undergone three-level ACD were evaluated retrospectively. The cases who were followed up for 2 years and longer were evaluated regarding gender, age, radiological findings, and patient satisfaction. A radiological assessment was made by calculating the Cobb angle on lateral cervical radiographs. Clinical assessment was performed by the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Results: In the first group, 13 patients had undergone ACD and fusion with peek cage and bone graft, and in the hybrid group, there were 11 patients in whom fusion with peek cage and bone graft were made in two levels, and cervical disc arthroplasty was performed throughout the distance in-between. In the hybrid group, the 1-month and 24-month changes in cervical range of motion in hyperflexion were statistically significant (p < 0.05). In both groups, significant improvements of NDI were determined postoperatively (p < 0.05). When the groups were compared, the 1-month and 24-month improvements were statistically significantly increased in the hybrid surgery group compared to the group that underwent fusion surgery with a cage (p < 0.05). Conclusions: HS is a reliable and effective treatment method in the three-level cervical disk disease for preserving and improving cervical ROM, particularly in the flexion position.

Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial disc replacement for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has long been regarded as a gold standard in the treatment of cervical myelopathy. Subsequently, cervical artificial disc replacement (c-ADR) was developed and provides the advantage of motion preservation at the level of the intervertebral disc surgical site, which may also reduce stress at adjacent levels. The goal of this study was to compare clinical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing ACDF with those in patients undergoing c-ADR for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed using the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from database inception to November 21, 2021. The authors compared Neck Disability Index (NDI), SF-36, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores; complication rates; and reoperation rates for these two surgical procedures in CSM patients. The Mantel-Haenszel method and variance-weighted means were used to analyze outcomes after identifying articles that met study inclusion criteria. RESULTS: More surgical time was consumed in the c-ADR surgery (p = 0.04). Shorter hospital stays were noted in patients who had undergone c-ADR (p = 0.04). Patients who had undergone c-ADR tended to have better NDI scores (p = 0.02) and SF-36 scores (p = 0.001). Comparable outcomes in terms of JOA scores (p = 0.24) and neurological success rate (p = 0.12) were noted after the surgery. There was no significant between-group difference in the overall complication rates (c-ADR: 18% vs ACDF: 25%, p = 0.17). However, patients in the ACDF group had a higher reoperation rate than patients in the c-ADR group (4.6% vs 1.5%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: At the midterm follow-up after treatment of CSM, better functional outcomes as reflected by NDI and SF-36 scores were noted in the c-ADR group than those in the ACDF group. c-ADR had the advantage of retaining range of motion at the level of the intervertebral disc surgical site without causing more complications. A large sample size with long-term follow-up studies may be required to confirm these findings in the future.

Rotational vertebral artery occlusion ("bow hunter syndrome").

PURPOSE: To review the literature, analyze and discuss diagnostic and treatment options for the Bowhunter Syndrome. A clinical case of idiopathic rotatory C1-C2 subluxation causing dynamic vertebral artery occlusion is presented. METHODS: Literature review between 1960 and 2019, discussion of diagnostic methods and treatment options. Description of diagnostic and treatment methods in the aforementioned case. RESULTS: We present a patient with dynamic left vertebral artery occlusion associated with idiopathic rotatory C1-C2 subluxation. A dynamic Angio-CT showed rotatory C1-C2 subluxation with significant flow reduction at the left vertebral artery at the exit of the C2 transverse foramen until the V3 segment when the head rotated towards the right. Due to clinical and radiological worsening in the following months, posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis was performed, with the disappearance of the symptoms. There are 193 cases reported with dynamic vertebral artery occlusion, but in only two, the etiology was primary rotational atlantoaxial instability. The most prevalent etiology was degenerative. CONCLUSION: Rotatory vertebral artery occlusion is a rare condition presented mostly in adults, aged 50-70 years. Vertebrobasilar insufficiency is triggered by the rotation of the head to the contralateral side of the dominant vertebral artery. Dynamic subtraction angiography is considered the diagnostic gold-standard method, but dynamic Angio-CT scan, Angio-MRI, or Doppler ultrasonography are less invasive options. The treatment options are conservative or surgical. Endovascular surgery is another option in specific cases.

Long-Term Clinicoradiological Outcomes of Cervical Fusion With Polyether Ether Ketone versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in a Double-Blinded Randomized Control Trial.

INTRODUCTION: In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, we compare the long-term clinicoradiological effects of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyether ether ketone implant (ACDF with PEEK) versus artificial cervical disc (cervical disc arthroplasty [CDA]) in patients with single and bilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). AIMS: We aimed to compare the pain scores, cervical kinematics, and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing CDA and ACDF for single and bilevel CDDD over 5 years. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This study was carried out from 2010 to 2019 in the Neurosurgery Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital attached to a Medical College in India. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 30 patients in each group. Clinical and radiological assessments were carried out for all patients over a period of 5 years. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Wilcoxon Signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Fischer's exact test were used for comparing the preoperative and follow-uP values. R software version 3.6.0 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A significant improvement in the cervical range of motion, sagittal range of motion (ROM), and functional spinal unit (FSU) was observed in the CDA group at final follow-up, while the PEEK group reported a significant decrease in the ROM and FSU and the difference between the two groups was also found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: When assessed over 5 years following surgery, we found CDA to be superior with respect to ROM, FSU, overall cervical alignment, and maintenance of disc height when compared to ACDF with PEEK implant.

The Mobi-C® cervical disc and other devices for two-level disc replacement: overview of its safety and efficacy.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become an acceptable alternative for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for a significant patient population with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy secondary to degenerative changes in the cervical spine. There are sufficient mid- and long-term data supporting performance and safety of one-level CDA. With the success of single-level cervical CDA, considerable interest exists about CDA use for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD). This review analyzes the safety and efficacy of two-level CDA for treatment of symptomatic cervical DDD with focus on the Mobi-C® Cervical Disc. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes previously published articles in a literature search using keywords: 'two-level-anterior cervical arthrodesis; two-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF); two-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA); two-level cervical total disc replacement; two-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease (DDD); Mobi-C® disc'. EXPERT OPINION: Two-level CDA with the Mobi-C® device demonstrated equivalent, and in certain aspects, favorable outcomes compared to ACDF for treatment of symptomatic cervical 2-level degenerative disc disease (DDD) indicating a satisfactory safety and efficacy profile.

A Comparison of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Patients with Two-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: 5-Year Follow-Up Results.

OBJECTIVE: To present a long-term clinical and radiographic comparison between the Prestige LP cervical disc replacement and the Zero-P spacer cervical disc fusion in the treatment of patients with symptomatic 2-level cervical degenerative disease. METHODS: In total, 36 patients in the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) group and 24 patients in the cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) group were analyzed before surgery and at 1 week and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after surgery. Clinical assessments included the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, visual analog scale, and Neck Disability Index scores. Radiographic assessments included cervical lordosis, range of motion (ROM) of the total cervical spine, functional spinal unit (FSU), and superior and inferior adjacent segments. Complications including heterotopic ossification and adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD) at 5-year follow-up were collected as well. RESULTS: Mean follow-up period was 65.6 months. Both the ACDF and CDA groups showed significant clinical improvements in terms of Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, visual analog scale, and Neck Disability Index (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups at the last follow-up period. A significant increase of cervical lordosis was observed in the CDA group after surgery whereas a significant difference was not observed between groups. ROM of the total cervical spine and FSU were maintained during the follow-up, and a significant decrease was observed in the ACDF group after surgery (P < 0.05). The ROM of the superior adjacent segment did not show any difference whereas the ROM of the inferior adjacent segment in the ACDF group presented a significant increase at 6 months and 1 year after surgery and a significant decrease at the last follow-up period. A total of 8 (33.3%) patients in the CDA group had an occurrence of heterotopic ossification. ASD was observed in 2 (8.3%) patients who underwent CDA surgery and 8 (22.2%) patients who underwent ACDF surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Prestige-LP and ZERO-P Spacer implantations is safe and effective. At 5 years after surgery, CDA with Prestige-LP is superior in terms of ROM of the total cervical spine, FSU, and inferior adjacent segment. It also has a relatively low occurrence rate of ASD. This procedure may be a suitable choice for the treatment of contiguous 2-level CDDD.

Comparative study between Plate-Graff, Plate-Cage and peek cage in cervical spine fusion.

OBJECTIVE: To compare results of Plate-Graff, Plate-Cage and PEEK cage in patients with cervical stenosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, with before and after intervention and comparative study. From January 2005 to October 2011 we included 37 patients (male: 48.6%, female: 51.4%) post-surgery by anterior approach; 3 groups via: Group I, arthrodesis with Plate-Graff n = 12 (M 41.7%, F 58.3%) with 22 levels, group II, Plate-Cage n = 11 (M 63.6% 36.4% F) 19 levels, group III, PEEK cage, n = 14 (M 0% F 50%) with 25 levels. Functional assessment pre- and postoperative with neck disability index (NDI) and visual analogue scale for pain (VAS). The radiological assessment with X-rays only. Descriptive statistics were obtained. Wilcoxon method use according to data distribution, non parametric tests of ranges with sign of Kruskal-Wallis for comparison between more than two groups, and significance level with p 0.05. We used the statistical package SPSS version 15. RESULTS: The majority of patients was found between the sixth and eighth decade of life. At one year of follow up the NDI and pain with VAS shown improvement with statistical difference in three groups (p = 0.001). However, the radiographic measurements per year of follow-up showed a significant improvement of segmental lordosis (p = 0.02) only in patients with Plate-Graff. CONCLUSIONS: Using the graft offers best clinical and radiographic results compared with the Plate Cage and box peek to one year of follow-up.

OBJETIVO: Comparar resultados de placa-injerto, caja-placa y caja-PEEK, en pacientes con conducto cervical estrecho. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo, en panel antes y después, de intervención y comparativo. De Enero de 2005 a Octubre de 2011, muestra de 37 pacientes (masculino: 48.6%, femenino: 51.4%) postoperados por vía anterior; formando tres grupos: grupo I, artrodesis con placa-injerto n = 12 (M 41.7%, F 58.3%) con 22 niveles; grupo II, caja-placa n = 11 (M 63.6%, F 36.4%) con 19 niveles; grupo III, caja-PEEK, n = 14 (M 50%, F 50%) con 25 niveles. La evaluación funcional pre- y postoperatoria mediante la escala de discapacidad cervical y escala visual análoga de dolor. La evaluación radiológica con radiografías de columna cervical. Se obtuvo estadística descriptiva. De acuerdo con la distribución de los datos se usaron pruebas no paramétricas de rangos con signo de Wilcoxon, y Kruskal-Wallis para comparación entre más de dos grupos. Con nivel de significancia de p0.05. Se utilizó el paquete estadístico SPSS versión 15. RESULTADOS: La mayoría de los pacientes se encontró entre la sexta y octava década de la vida. Al año de postoperados el índice de discapacidad cervical y mejoría del dolor con EVA mostraron mejoría con diferencia estadística en los tres grupos (p = 0.001). Sin embargo, las mediciones radiográficas al año de seguimiento mostraron una mejoría significativa de la lordosis segmentaria (p = 0.02) sólo en pacientes operados con placa-injerto. CONCLUSIONES: El uso de la placa-injerto ofrece mejores resultados clínicos y radiográficos en comparación con la caja-placa y caja-PEEK, al año de seguimiento.

Comparative study between Plate-Graff, Plate-Cage and PEEK cage in cervical spine fusion / Estudio comparativo entre Plate-Graff, Plate-Cage y Peek cage en la fusión de la columna cervical

Abstract: Objective: To compare results of Plate-Graff, Plate-Cage and PEEK cage in patients with cervical stenosis. Material and methods: Prospective, with before and after intervention and comparative study. From January 2005 to October 2011 we included 37 patients (male: 48.6%, female: 51.4%) post-surgery by anterior approach; 3 groups via: Group I, arthrodesis with Plate-Graff n = 12 (M 41.7%, F 58.3%) with 22 levels, group II, Plate-Cage n = 11 (M 63.6% 36.4% F) 19 levels, group III, PEEK cage, n = 14 (M 0% F 50%) with 25 levels. Functional assessment pre- and postoperative with neck disability index (NDI) and visual analogue scale for pain (VAS). The radiological assessment with X-rays only. Descriptive statistics were obtained. Wilcoxon method use according to data distribution, non parametric tests of ranges with sign of Kruskal-Wallis for comparison between more than two groups, and significance level with p < 0.05. We used the statistical package SPSS version 15. Results: The majority of patients was found between the sixth and eighth decade of life. At one year of follow up the NDI and pain with VAS shown improvement with statistical difference in three groups (p = 0.001). However, the radiographic measurements per year of follow-up showed a significant improvement of segmental lordosis (p = 0.02) only in patients with Plate-Graff. Conclusions: Using the graft offers best clinical and radiographic results compared with the Plate Cage and box peek to one year of follow-up.

Resumen: Objetivo: Comparar resultados de placa-injerto, caja-placa y caja-PEEK, en pacientes con conducto cervical estrecho. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo, en panel antes y después, de intervención y comparativo. De Enero de 2005 a Octubre de 2011, muestra de 37 pacientes (masculino: 48.6%, femenino: 51.4%) postoperados por vía anterior; formando tres grupos: grupo I, artrodesis con placa-injerto n = 12 (M 41.7%, F 58.3%) con 22 niveles; grupo II, caja-placa n = 11 (M 63.6%, F 36.4%) con 19 niveles; grupo III, caja-PEEK, n = 14 (M 50%, F 50%) con 25 niveles. La evaluación funcional pre- y postoperatoria mediante la escala de discapacidad cervical y escala visual análoga de dolor. La evaluación radiológica con radiografías de columna cervical. Se obtuvo estadística descriptiva. De acuerdo con la distribución de los datos se usaron pruebas no paramétricas de rangos con signo de Wilcoxon, y Kruskal-Wallis para comparación entre más de dos grupos. Con nivel de significancia de p<0.05. Se utilizó el paquete estadístico SPSS versión 15. Resultados: La mayoría de los pacientes se encontró entre la sexta y octava década de la vida. Al año de postoperados el índice de discapacidad cervical y mejoría del dolor con EVA mostraron mejoría con diferencia estadística en los tres grupos (p = 0.001). Sin embargo, las mediciones radiográficas al año de seguimiento mostraron una mejoría significativa de la lordosis segmentaria (p = 0.02) sólo en pacientes operados con placa-injerto. Conclusiones: El uso de la placa-injerto ofrece mejores resultados clínicos y radiográficos en comparación con la caja-placa y caja-PEEK, al año de seguimiento.

Opioid use following cervical spine surgery: trends and factors associated with long-term use.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Limited or no data exist evaluating risk factors associated with prolonged opioid use following cervical arthrodesis. PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to assess trends in postoperative narcotic use among preoperative opioid users (OUs) versus non-opioid users (NOUs) and to identify factors associated with postoperative narcotic use at 1 year following cervical arthrodesis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The patient sample included 17,391 patients (OU: 52.4%) registered in the Humana Inc claims dataset who underwent anterior cervical fusion (ACF) or posterior cervical fusion (PCF) between 2007 and 2015. OUTCOME MEASURES: Prolonged opioid usage was defined as narcotic prescription filling at 1 year following cervical arthrodesis. METHODS: Based on preoperative opioid use, patients were identified as an OU (history of narcotic prescription filled within 3 months before surgery) or a NOU (no preoperative prescription). Rates of opioid use were evaluated preoperatively for OU and trended for 1 year postoperatively for both OU and NOU. Multivariable regression techniques investigated factors associated with the use of narcotics at 1 year following ACF and PCF. Based on the model findings, a web-based interactive app was developed to estimate 1-year postoperative risk of using narcotics following cervical arthrodesis (http://neuro-risk.com/opiod-use/ or https://www.neurosurgerycost.com/opioid/opioid_use). RESULTS: Overall, 87.4% of the patients (n=15,204) underwent ACF, whereas 12.6% (n=2187) underwent PCF. At 1 month following surgery, 47.7% of NOUs and 82% of OUs had a filled opioid prescription. Rates of prescription opioids declined significantly to 7.8% in NOUs versus 50.5% in OUs at 3 months, but plateaued at the 6- to 12-month postoperative period (NOU: 5.7%-6.7%, OU: 44.9%-46.9%). At 1 year, significantly higher narcotic prescription filling rates were observed in OUs compared with NOUs (45.3% vs. 6.3%, p<.001). Preoperative opioid use was a significant driver of 1-year narcotic use following ACF (odds ratio [OR]: 7.02, p<.001) and PCF (OR: 6.98, p<.001), along with younger age (≤50 years), history of drug dependence, and lower back pain. CONCLUSIONS: Over 50% of the patients used opioids before cervical arthrodesis. Postoperative opioid use fell dramatically during the first 3 months in NOU, but nearly half of the preoperative OUs will remain on narcotics at 1 year postoperatively. Our findings serve as a baseline in identifying patients at risk of chronic use and encourage discontinuation of opioids before cervical spine surgery.

Risk factors for non-fusion segment disease after anterior cervical spondylosis surgery: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up of 171 patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence and causes of non-fusion segment disease (NFSD), both adjacent and non-adjacent to a fused segment, after anterior cervical arthrodesis. METHODS: This is a single-center study. Between January 1998 and January 2011, two surgeons' 171 patients who had an anterior cervical decompression and fusion were followed clinically for more than 5 years. The correlation between the incidence of symptomatic non-fusion segment disease and the following clinical parameters (age at operation, fusion levels,) and radiological parameters (number of patients who had a plate, anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) or corpectomies, preoperative and postoperative cervical spine alignment, Pavlov's ratio at the C5 level, and preoperative existence of a non-fusion segment degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging) was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 171 patients reviewed, 16 patients had non-fusion segment disease (9.36%), of which 12 had adjacent segment disease and 4 had non-adjacent segment disease. Postoperative cervical lordosis in the non-fusion segment disease group was significantly smaller than that of the disease-free group (P < 0.001). Fusion levels in the NFSD group were 1.69 whereas 2.26 in disease-free group (P = 0.005). The incidences of disc degeneration in unfused segments was more severe in the NFSD group than in the disease-free group (P = 0.004). The results of binary logistic regression showed that the major factor affecting NFSD is postoperative cervical lordosis (P = 0.000) followed by disc degeneration (P = 0.024). The other parameters did not show a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of symptomatic non-fusion segment disease after anterior cervical arthrodesis has multifactorial causes. Postoperative cervical lordosis and disc degeneration in non-fusion segments were major factors in the incidence of NFSD.

Review of long-term outcomes of disc arthroplasty for symptomatic single level cervical degenerative disc disease.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was developed as an alternative for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for nerve root decompression. The rationale behind CDA was to help prevent adjacent segment degeneration which potentially may lead to additional surgery. Multiple randomized controlled trials have evaluated a myriad of disc arthroplasty devices over the past 10 years and provided data regarding clinical benefits and safety. Their long-term data, reporting results at 5-10 years, presents the opportunity to comment on the overall efficacy, safety and reported complications of these devices. This report reviews results of the Prestige, proDisc-C, Mobi-C Disc and various other arthroplasty devices and provides an overall report of the longest term available data and comparisons between devices. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes previously published articles in a literature search using keywords: 'cervical disc arthroplasty', 'cervical total disc replacement', 'anterior cervical decompression and fusion', 'anterior cervical arthrodesis', 'symptomatic degenerative disc disease' and commercial names of devices. EXPERT COMMENTARY: CDA, with the devices reviewed, resulted in favorable outcomes in comparison to ACDF for the treatment of symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) taking in to account the long-term functional recovery, adverse events, development of adjacent segment degeneration and subsequent surgical interventions.

Risk Factors for Dysphagia Following a Cervical Fusion in a Trauma Population.

Background Dysphagia following a cervical fusion is a known complication; however, this has not been examined in the trauma population. We sought to identify risk factors that can be optimized in this population. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review on consecutive trauma patients who underwent a cervical fusion from 2014 to 2017 at a single institution with multiple surgeons. We included patients more than 18-years-old who were admitted through the emergency department with a diagnosis of acute cervical injury and underwent a cervical fusion during the same admission. We excluded patients who remained intubated postoperatively or underwent a tracheostomy. The primary outcome was dysphagia as evaluated by a bedside swallow test on postoperative day one by the nursing staff. This was followed by a standardized assessment performed by a speech therapist on postoperative day two in some cases. Variables of interest included sex, age, mechanism of injury, surgical approach, cervical levels, and Charlson comorbidity index. Univariate analysis was also utilized. Results Sixty patients met the study criteria. Nineteen patients (31.7%) developed dysphagia postoperatively. Mechanical falls were the most common injury mechanism (80%) and most surgical procedures were performed on the subaxial cervical spine (68.3%). Comparing the dysphagia groups, there was no significant difference among the confounding variables. Patients with dysphagia had an increased length of stay (10.6 ± 6.7 vs. 7.4 ± 3.1, p = 0.056) and were more likely to have had an anterior vs. posterior cervical fusion (63.2% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.056). Conclusions We found no statistically significant risk factors leading to postoperative dysphagia. The objective of this pilot is to find the baseline dysphagia rate and the potential modifiable factors in this unique patient population undergoing cervical fusion procedures.

Diagnosing Pseudoarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Radiographic confirmation of fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery is a critical aspect of determining surgical success. However, there is a lack of established diagnostic radiographic parameters for pseudoarthrosis. The purpose of this study is to summarize the findings of previous studies, review the advantages and disadvantages of frequently employed diagnostic criteria, and present our recommended protocol of fusion assessment. This study identified randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies reporting on spinal fusion and how successful fusion after ACDF. Among the 39 articles reviewed, bridging bone across the operated levels on static radiographs was the most commonly used criteria to confirm fusion (31 of 39, 79%). Dynamic flexion-extension radiographs were used to assess for interspinous movement (ISM) (22 of 39, 56.4%) and change in Cobb angle (12 of 39, 30.8%). Computed tomography (CT) based findings (21 of 39, 53.8%) were employed in ambiguous cases with improved sensitivity and specificity. Reconstructed CT scans were used to assess for intragraft bridging bone and extragraft bridging bone (ExGBB). ExGBB were proved to have the highest diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for pseudoarthrosis detection when compared to all other radiographic criteria. The ISM <1 mm on dynamic flexion-extension radiographs had high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as well. After our reviewing, we recommend using dynamic lateral flexion-extension cervical spine radiographs at 150% magnificationin which the interspinous motion <1 mm and superjacent interspinous motion ≥4 mm confirms fusion. In ambiguous cases, we recommend using reconstructed CT scans to evaluate for ExGBB.

Image-Guided Lateral Mass Osteotomy for En Bloc Resection of Cervical Ewing Sarcoma: A Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: En bloc resection of Ewing sarcoma in the cervical spine according to Enneking's principles is technically challenging owing to the proximity of important neurovascular structures, the complex local anatomy, and the biomechanical instability of radical resection. The rarity of Ewing sarcoma and variability of its presentation justifies ongoing exploration and compilation of the surgical nuances and subtleties of en bloc resection in the cervical spine. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present a 34-year-old male with Ewing sarcoma of the neck who underwent successful en bloc resection using a novel technique of splitting the laminae and osteomizing the lateral masses under imaging guidance. CONCLUSIONS: This novel and successful approach of en bloc resection in the cervical spine can add to the spinal surgeon's repertoire when dealing with complex cervical tumor masses.

Instrumentación cervical en pacientes menores de 10 años / Cervical instrumentation and fusion in children under 10 years old

Introducción: la instrumentación de la columna cervical pediátrica ha ganado terreno en la última década. Las diferencias anatómicas y biomecánicas entre la columna cervical pediátrica y del adulto hacen que la cirugía requiera de una minuciosa preparación toda vez que se utilizan implantes diseñados para adultos. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los resultados posoperatorios en una serie de niños <10 años sometidos a fusión cervical instrumentada, y describir la técnica quirúrgica y las complicaciones. Materiales y Métodos: Se evaluó a 28 pacientes con patología cervical tratados con fusión instrumentada utilizando las técnicas descritas por Roy-Camille y Magerl para masas laterales, de Goel-Harms para C1-C2, y las fusiones occipitocervicales con placas occipitales o rótulas. Los criterios de inclusión fueron: pacientes <10 años, cirugía primaria y un seguimiento mínimo de 2 años. Resultados: La muestra incluyó 17 niñas y 11 niños, con un seguimiento promedio de 3.8 años (rango 2-10). La edad promedio fue de 6.1 años (rango 1.6-10). La tasa promedio de complicaciones generales fue del 32,1%. Los pacientes que tuvieron más complicaciones sufrían: síndromes genéticos [6 casos (21,4%)] y displasias esqueléticas [3 casos (10,7%)]. Trece tenían <6 años, 7 de ellos presentaron complicaciones (53,8%). Conclusiones: La instrumentación cervical en pacientes <10 años demostró ser un procedimiento factible y seguro. Las displasias vertebrales, las anomalías congénitas y los síndromes genéticos, sumados al factor edad <6 años, son las principales variables asociadas a las complicaciones observadas.

Introduction: pediatric cervical spine implants and construction designs had rapidly evolved in the last decade. Anatomic and biomechanical differences between pediatric and adult cervical spine require a thorough preoperative planning, because these implants were originally designed for adults. The objective of this study was to assess the postoperative results of cervical instrumented fusion in children under 10 years old, and to describe the surgical technique and complications. Methods: Twenty-eight children with different cervical pathology treated with instrumented fusion were evaluated. The following procedures were used: Roy-Camille’s and Magerl’s techniques for lateral masses, Goel-Harms’ technique for C1-C2 fusion, and occipital-cervical fusion with occipital plates or screws. Inclusion criteria were: children under 10 years, no prior spine surgery, and minimum follow-up of 2 years. Results: Sample included 17 girls and 11 boys, with a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (range 2-10). Mean age was 6.1 years (range: 1.6-10). Overall complication rate was 32.1%. The highest complication rates were associated with: genetic syndromes [6 cases (21.4%)], skeletal dysplasias [3 cases (10.7%)]. Thirteen patients were <6 years, 7 of them had complications (53.8%). Conclusions: Cervical instrumented fusion in patients <10 years old proved to be a feasible and safe surgical procedure. Vertebral dysplasias, congenital, syndromic anomalies, and being younger than 6 years old are the main factors associated with high complication rates.

Anterior mediastinal tracheostomy with a median mandibular splitting approach in a Larsen syndrome patient with posterior cervical arthrodesis.

Larsen syndrome is a rare congenital connective tissue disorder characterized by multiple joint dislocations. A novel anterior mediastinal tracheostomy with a median mandibular splitting approach is presented for the treatment of airway obstruction in a Larsen syndrome patient with posterior cervical arthrodesis.