A nomogram illustrating the probability of anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of anastomotic dehiscence following cervical esophagogastrostomy may become difficult. Estimation of an individual probability could help to establish preventive and diagnostic measures. The predictive impact of epidemiological, surgery-related data and laboratory parameters on the development of anastomotic dehiscence was investigated in the immediate perioperative period. METHODS: Retrospective study in 412 patients with cervical esophagogastrostomy following esophagectomy. Epidemiological data, risk factors, underlying disease, pre-treatment- and surgery-related data, C-reactive protein and albumin levels pre-and post-operatively were evaluated. We applied univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis and developed a nomogram for individual risk assessment. RESULTS: There were 345 male, 67 female patients, mean aged 61.5 years; 284 had orthotopic, 128 retrosternal gastric pull-up; 331 patients had carcinoma, 81 non-malignant disease. Mean duration of operation was 184 min; 235 patients had manual, 113 mechanical and 64 semi-mechanical suturing; 76 patients (18.5%) developed anastomotic dehiscence clinically evident at mean 11.4 days after surgery. In univariable testing young age, retrosternal conduit transposition, manual suturing, high body mass index, high ASA and high postoperative levels of C-reactive protein were predictors for anastomotic leakage. These six parameters which had yielded a p < 0.1 in the univariable analysis, were entered into a multivariable analysis and a nomogram allowing the determination of the patient's individual risk was created. CONCLUSION: By using the nomogram as a supportive measure in the perioperative management, the patient's individual probability of developing an anastomotic leak could be quantified which may help to take preventive measures improving the outcome.

A Man with Dysphagia after Cervical Esophagogastrostomy: A Case Report / 대한연하장애학회지

Dysphagia caused by a functional gastric outlet obstruction is rare and the natural course of a functional gastric outlet obstruction is unclear. This paper reports a patient with dysphagia and a functional gastric outlet obstruction after a cervical esophagogastrostomy. A 62-year-old man with a history of esophageal cancer and cervical esophagogastrostomy presented with dysphagia and discomfort during meals. A videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) with barium revealed a mild increase in the post-swallow remnants and delayed emptying of the gastric outlet, reflecting a functional gastric outlet obstruction at the diaphragm. One month later, VFSS revealed a worsened functional gastric outlet obstruction at the diaphragm. A delayed chest X-ray showed worsened delayed emptying of the gastric outlet. A cervical esophagogastrostomy for early esophageal cancer can cause functional gastric outlet obstruction, presenting as dysphagia and discomfort during meals. Physicians should be concerned about dysphagia and the functional changes in the esophagus in patients with a cervical esophagogastrostomy.

Anastomotic reinforcement with omentoplasty reduces anastomotic leakage for minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis.

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage is the most feared postoperative complication after esophagectomy. Omentoplasty, wrapping the omentum around the alimentary tract anastomosis, is thought to decrease the anastomotic leakage rate. The purpose of this clinical study is to investigate the use of omentoplasty to reinforce cervical esophagogastrostomy after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, the data of 160 consecutive patients who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy after MIE between September 2012 and May 2015 were analyzed, 87 who underwent omentoplasty (group A) and 73 who did not undergo omentoplasty (group B). The primary outcome was the incidence of anastomotic leakage and anastomotic strictures after the operation. Secondary outcomes were other complications and mortality rate. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variables associated with an increased risk for anastomotic leak was performed. RESULTS: The median age was 61 years (range, 37-82 years). The anastomotic leakage rates were 4.6% (4/87) in group A and 15.1% (11/73) in group B (P = 0.023). There was no statistical significance in anastomotic stricture rates between group A (6.9%) and group B (9.6%; P = 0.535). No difference was noted in other complications between the groups. There was a trend toward lower leak-associated mortality rates for group A (0%) compared with that for group B (4.1%). CONCLUSION: Cervical esophagogastrostomy with omentoplasty is more effective than esophagogastrostomy without omentoplasty for the prevention of anastomotic leakage in MIE with cervical anastomosis. Omentoplasty could be used as an adjunct technique to reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage in cervical esophagogastrostomy following MIE.