Comparative Efficacy of Mind-Body Exercise for Treating Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of different mind-body exercise (MBE) interventions, including Yoga, Pilates, Qigong, and Tai Chi, in managing chronic non-specific neck pain (CNNP). We searched randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. After screening eligible studies and extracting relevant data, risk of bias of included studies was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool, and network meta-analysis was performed by the Stata software version 16.0. RECENT FINDINGS: Of the 1019 studies retrieved, 18 studies with 1442 subjects were included. Fourteen studies were graded as high quality. Yoga plus hot sand fomentation was the most effective in reducing pain intensity and functional disability, and improving the quality of physical life in patients with CNNP. Yoga achieved the most improvement in cervical mobility. And Pilates was the best MBE intervention for improving the quality of mental life. Overall, Yoga, Pilates, Qigong, and Tai Chi demonstrated considerable effectiveness in improving pain intensity, functional disability, cervical mobility, and quality of life in patients with CNNP. Yoga or Yoga plus heat therapy was the most effective method for patients with CNNP. Additional high-quality, large-scale, multi-center, long-term follow-up studies are necessary to fully understand the comparative effectiveness of different MBE interventions for CNNP, and to recognize the potential benefits of each MBE intervention and the need for individualized treatment approaches.

Anterior Fusion and Long-Term Cervical Mobility in Patients With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: An Observational Study.

Objective This study aims to determine and quantify the impairment of cervical mobility and range of motion in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) and subsequent cervical subaxial fusion surgery. Methods A total of 89 patients who underwent interbody fusion of the cervical spine and were admitted to the Spinal Cord Injury Center of the BG Klinikum Hamburg, Germany between 2003 and 2018 were examined after their in-facility rehabilitation was successfully completed. Reclination, inclination, tilt, and rotation of the cervical spine were examined and documented in addition to overall patient characteristics and fusion extent. Results We could identify fusion length and age to be independently negatively correlated with the cervical range of motion in different degrees of movement. We could also show a significant decrease in cervical mobility within our patients when compared to healthy adults. The ability to tilt and rotate the cervical spine was particularly impaired. Conclusions Patients with traumatic SCI and intervertebral fusion suffer from significant impairment of mobility in different degrees of movement. This knowledge can be used to evaluate the rehabilitative challenges and reintegrative needs of individuals after traumatic SCI. Rehabilitation should be adjusted accordingly.

Tratamento manipulativo osteopático em paciente com síndrome da pessoa rígida e miastenia gravis: relato de caso / Osteopathic manipulative treatment in person with stiff person syndrome and myasthenia gravis: case report

Introdução: Síndrome da Pessoa Rígida (SPR) é uma doença neurológica autoimune rara caracterizada pela rigidez e espasmos musculares episódicos dolorosos, especialmente no tronco e extremidades do corpo, gerando comprometimento funcional importante. Existe uma lacuna de conhecimento sobre os possíveis efeitos do tratamento manipulativo osteopático (TMO) nos sintomas motores de pessoas com SPR. Objetivos: Descrever os efeitos do TMO na tontura, equilíbrio e amplitude de movimento (ADM) cervical em uma pessoa com a SPR e miastenia gravis. Método: Relato de caso baseado no TMO em uma mulher com SPR e miastenia grave. As seguintes avaliações foram utilizadas: Inventário de Brazilian Version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Fall Efficacy Scale (FES I ­ Brazil), Timed Get Up and Go Test (TUG), Teste de Sentar e Levantar 5 vezes, goniometria dos movimentos da coluna cervical. Resultados: Nenhum resultado expressivo foi obtido pela FES-I (-1,8%) e DHI (0%). Para os testes funcionais (TUG e Sentado para de pé 5 vezes) observamos melhora de 5,8% e 6,7%, respectivamente, após o tratamento. A ADM cervical melhorou substancialmente em todos os movimentos avaliados (flexão: 60%, extensão: 28%, rotação direita: 33%, rotação esquerda:38%, inclinação lateral direita: 77%, inclinação lateral esquerda: 87%). Conclusão: O TMO proposto pareceu ser importante para melhora da ADM cervical no caso relatado. Medo de quedas, impacto da tontura na qualidade de vida e funcionalidade de membros inferiores não demonstrou melhoras após o TMO.

Introduction: Stiff Person Syndrome (SPS) is a rare neurological autoimmune disease characterized by stiffness and painful episodic muscle spasms, especially in the trunk and extremities of the body, causing significant functional impairment in affected individuals. There is a gap in knowledge about the possible effects of an osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) on the motor symptoms of people with SPS. Objectives: To describe the effects of an OMT on dizziness, balance deficit, and cervical range of motion (ROM) in a patient with SPS and myasthenia gravis. Methods: This is a case report on an OMT intervention in a woman with SPS and myasthenia gravis. The following assessments were used: Brazilian Version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Fall Efficacy Scale (FES I ­ Brazil), Timed Get Up and Go Test (TUG), Stand Up Test 5 times, goniometry of cervical movements. Results: No expressive results were obtained for FES I ­ Brazil (-1.8%) and DHI (0%). For the functional tests (TUG and Sit and stand up 5x) we observed an improvement of 5.8% and 6.7%, respectively, after treatment. The cervical ROM improved substantially in all movements tested (flexion: 60%, extension: 28%, right rotation: 33%, left rotation: 38%, right side bending: 77%, left side bending: 87%). Conclusion: The proposed OMT appears to be important for the improvement of cervical ROM in this case. Fear of falls, impact of dizziness on quality of life, and lower limb functionality did not demonstrate meaningful improvements after the OMT.

Cervical mobility and cervical proprioception in relation to fall risk among older adults: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Age-related decreases in cervical mobility and proprioception have previously been demonstrated. Potential associations of these deteriorations with fall risk have not been investigated so far. This study aims to compare cervical mobility and proprioception between fallers and non-fallers and prospectively assess the contribution of these parameters in fall risk identification among healthy older adults. METHODS: 95 community-dwelling older adults underwent a cervical screening. Active cervical range of motion (aCROM) was measured using a digital inclinometer and cervical proprioception was assessed by determining joint position error (JPE). Fear of falling was identified through the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (iconFES). Falls were prospectively recorded during a 1-year follow-up period using monthly calendars. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between these parameters and falls occurrence. RESULTS: Baseline measurements revealed reduced cervical performance (i.e., smaller aCROM and larger JPE) among individuals who reported at least one fall during the following year ("fallers"). The multivariate logistic regression model contained eight independent variables (age, sex, walking aid, fall history, iconFES, aCROM F, aCROM E and JPE) and correctly classified 77.8% of cases. CONCLUSION: Although the contribution of cervical parameters to fall risk identification seems to be rather small compared to well-known (though often unmodifiable) major risk factors, further research is needed to elucidate underlying mechanisms of cervical functions in relation to falls. Second, it would be interesting to develop a targeted fall preventive cervical exercise program and assess its effectiveness in terms of falls occurrence.

Kinematics of Cervical Spine during Rowing Ergometer at Different Stroke Rates in Young Rowers: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Research on biomechanics in rowing has mostly focused on the lumbar spine. However, injuries can also affect other body segments. Thus, the aim of this pilot study was to explore any potential variations in the kinematics of the cervical spine during two different stroke rates on the rowing ergometer in young rowers. METHODS: Twelve young rowers of regional or national level were recruited for the study. The experimental protocol consisted of two separate test sessions (i.e., a sequence of 10 consecutive strokes for each test session) at different stroke rates (i.e., 20 and 30 strokes/min) on an indoor rowing ergometer. Kinematics of the cervical spine was assessed using an inertial sensor capable of measuring joint ROM (angle of flexion, angle of extension, total angle of flexion-extension). RESULTS: Although there were no differences in the flexion and total flexion-extension movements between the test sessions, a significant increase in the extension movement was found at the highest stroke rate (p = 0.04, d = 0.66). CONCLUSION: Young rowers showed changes in cervical ROM according to stroke rate. The lower control of the head during the rowing stroke cycle can lead to a higher compensation resulting in an augmented effort, influencing sports performance, and increasing the risk of injury.

Is there a relationship between sagittal cervical spine mobility and generalised joint hypermobility? A cross-sectional study of 1000 healthy Australians.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to determine the association between sagittal cervical mobility and the presence and extent of GJH across the lifespan. Secondary aims were to determine which features explain variability in cervical range of motion (CROM) and to establish the sagittal cervical hypermobile range in both genders across the lifespan. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. Spearman's rho determined the relationship between presence and extent of GJH and CROM, age, gender and ethnicity. Multiple regression identified the factors explaining variability in CROM. The hypermobile CROM was identified as the upper 5% of flexion, extension and combined ranges for age and gender. SETTING: University laboratory in Sydney Australia. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand healthy individuals, aged 3-101 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cervical active range of motion was assessed using an inclinometer, extent of and presence of generalised joint hypermobility were assessed using the Beighton scoring system and age- and gender-specific criteria respectively. RESULTS: CROM correlated positively with GJH (Beighton score as a continuous or dichotomous age and gender specific variable) (rho=0.12-0.50; p < 0.001) and negatively with age (rho=0.54; p < 0.001). Age, gender and extent of GJH (Beighton as a continuous score) accounted for 19 to 51% of variability in CROM. Cut-offs for cervical hypermobility were calculated across the lifespan. CONCLUSIONS: Increased sagittal CROM was observed in individuals identified with GJH. Extension CROM decreased with age more than flexion; the greatest loss in the second and third decades. CROM screening is warranted for patients identified with GJH and for rehabilitation goal-setting.

Preoperative X-ray C2C6AR is applicable for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spondylosis.

BACKGROUND: Airway management is one of the most important techniques in anesthesia practice and inappropriate airway management is related with airway injury, brain hypoxia, and even death. The patients with cervical spondylosis are often confronted with difficult laryngoscopy who are more prone to appear difficult airway, so it is important to figure out valuable predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in these patients. METHODS: We randomly enrolled 270 patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery and analyzed the cervical mobility data in predicting difficult laryngoscopy. The preoperative X-ray radiological indicators were measured by an attending radiologist. Cormack-Lehane scales were assessed during intubation, and patients with a class III or IV view were assigned to the difficult laryngoscopy group. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that the hyomental distance (HMD, the distance between the hyoid bone and the tip of the chin) and the hyomental distance ratio (HMDR, the ratio between HMD in the extension position and the one in the neutral position) might not be suitable indicators in patients with cervical spondylosis. Binary multivariate logistic regression (backward-Wald) analyses identified two independent correlative factors from the cervical mobility indicators that correlated best as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy: modified Mallampati test (MMT) and C2C6AR (the ratio of the angle between a line passing through the bottom of the second cervical vertebra and a line passing through the bottom of the sixth cervical vertebra in the extension position and the one in the neutral position). The odds ratio (OR) and 95 % CI were 2.292(1.093-4.803) and 0.493 (0.306-0.793), respectively. C2C6AR exhibited the largest area under the curve (0.714; 95 % CI 0.633-0.794). CONCLUSIONS: C2C6AR based on preoperative X-ray images may be the most accurate predictor of cervical mobility indicators for difficult laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spondylosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn ; identifier: ChiCTR-ROC-16,008,598) on June 6, 2016.

Does cervical range of motion affect the outcomes of canalith repositioning procedures for posterior canal benign positional paroxysmal vertigo?

PURPOSE: Canalith repositioning procedure (CRP) for posterior canal benign positional paroxysmal vertigo (BPPV), also known as Epley maneuver, is a common procedure for the treatment of BPPV. This maneuver entails flexion, extension and rotation of the patient's neck. This study aims to investigate the impact of cervical range of motion (C-ROM) on CRP efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 47 patients with posterior canal BPPV treated by CRP. The procedure was considered successful if vertigo and nystagmus disappeared at the post-treatment evaluation. If CRP resulted ineffective, it was repeated up to three times per session. C-ROM was measured at BPPV diagnosis before treatment. Patients were followed up for 30 days. RESULTS: The first CRP was successful in 29 patients (61.7%), while it was ineffective in 18 patients (38.3%) requiring multiple repositioning maneuvers. Patients who needed two or more CRP showed lower C-ROM in extension (p = .003) and flexion (p = .042), and earlier recurrences (p = .006). Univariate regression analysis showed that lower cervical extension was significantly associated with the failure of the first CRP (OR: 0.899, 95% CI 0.831-0.973, p = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a reduced C-ROM can require multiple CRPs to successfully treat BPPV and increase the risk of early recurrences.

Changes in cervical movement impairment and pain following orofacial treatment in patients with chronic arthralgic temporomandibular disorder with pain: A prospective case series.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of isolated temporomandibular joint (TMJ) manual therapy on pain and range of motion (ROM) of the TMJ and cervical spine including flexion-rotation test (FRT) in people suffering chronic pain arising from chronic arthralgic temporomandibular disorder (TMD). An experienced clinician managed a case series of 12 patients with TMD (mean duration 28.6 months +/- 26.9). The intervention comprised four-weekly sessions of transverse medial accessory TMJ mobilization and advice. Patients were examined prior to and one-week following the intervention period. Outcome measures included jaw disability (JFLS-20), jaw pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), maximal mouth opening ROM, cervical ROM including FRT, and pain during cervical movement. A paired t-test revealed significant improvement following the intervention in disability (p < 0.001), VAS pain score at rest (p < 0.001) and at maximum mouth opening (p < 0.001), jaw opening ROM (p < 0.001), FRT ROM to the left (p = 0.024) and right (p = 0.001). In contrast, no significant change was identified for total cervical ROM (p = 0.905). After the intervention, five patients (41.66%) had no pain at rest or at maximal mouth opening, and all had a negative FRT. The effect sizes indicate a moderate to strong, clinically significant effect for all variables apart from total cervical ROM. While a case series cannot identify a cause and effect relationship, these results provide preliminary evidence for the influence of TMJ manual therapy on measures of TMD including pain, as well as upper but not whole cervical movement and associated pain in patients with a diagnosis of TMJ arthralgia.

Upper cervical range of motion is impaired in patients with temporomandibular disorders.

AIMS: Clinicians increasingly suggest assessment and treatment of the cervical spine in patients with temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD); however, few studies have investigated upper cervical spine mobility in people who suffer from TMD. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether patients with TMD pain (with or without headache) present with upper cervical spine impairment when compared with asymptomatic subjects. METHODOLOGY: A single blind examiner evaluated cervical range of motion (ROM) measures including axial rotation during the flexion-rotation test (FRT) and sagittal plane ROM. Twenty asymptomatic subjects were compared with 37 subjects with pain attributed to TMD, confirmed by the Revised Research Diagnostic Criteria. Subjects with TMD were divided according to the presence of headache (26 without headache TMDNHA, 11 with headache TMDHA). One-way analysis of variance and planned orthogonal comparisons were used to determine differences in cervical mobility between groups. All subjects with TMD were positive on the FRT with restricted ROM, while none were in the control group. RESULTS: The analysis of variance revealed significant differences between groups for the FRT F(2,54) = 57.96, P<0.001) and for sagittal ROM [F(2,54) = 5.69, P = 0.006]. Findings show that the TMDHA group had less axial rotation than group TMDNHA, and both TMD groups had less ROM than controls. For sagittal ROM, the only difference was between group TMDHA and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with TMD had signs of upper cervical spine movement impairment, greater in those with headache. Only subjects with TMD and headache had impairment of cervical spine sagittal plane mobility. This study provides evidence for the importance of examination of upper cervical mobility determined by the FRT in patients who suffer from TMD.