Outcomes of vaginal repair and vaginal repair combined with GnRHa administration in the treatment of cesarean section scar defects: A randomized clinical trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To prospectively investigate whether the application of vaginal repair (VR) of cesarean section scar defect (CSD) combined with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) achieve better clinical outcomes than VR alone. DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 124 women with CSD were undergoing expectant management from December 2016 to September 2021. 61 were randomised to VR+ GnRHa and 63 to VR alone. INTERVENTION: Vaginal repair combined with GnRHa and vaginal repair alone. MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the duration of menstruation and thickness of the remaining muscular layer (TRM) at 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the length, width and depth of the CSD; operation time; estimated blood loss; hospitalization time; and operative complications. Women were treated with either VR (n = 63) or VR + GnRHa (n = 61). Menstruation and TRM in patients pre. vs. post comparisons either with VR or VR + GnRHa are significant improved (P < .05). Significant differences in menstruation duration and TRM occurred in patients treated with VR + GnRHa compared with those treated with VR (P < .05). Moreover, the rate of CSD after surgery in the VR group was significantly higher than that in the VR + GnRHa group (P = .033), and CSD patients in the VR + GnRHa group achieved better therapeutic effects than those in the VR group (P = .017). Patients who received VR + GnRHa had a shorter menstruation duration and a greater increment of TRM postoperatively than did patients treated with VR alone (P = .021; P = .002, respectively). CONCLUSION: VR + GnRHa therapy has a greater potential to improve scar healing and reduce the number of menstruation days than VR alone for symptomatic women with CSD. PRéCIS: Vaginal Repair Combined with GnRHa Creates Better Therapeutic Effects of CSD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Date of registration: October 13, 2016, Date of initial participant enrollment: December 20, 2016, Clinical trial identification number: NCT02932761, URL of the registration site: ClinicalTrials.gov, Figshare DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24117114 LINK TO THE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02932761.

Link between cesarean section scar defect and secondary infertility: Case reports and review.

The objective was to study clinical cases and understand the link between cesarean section scar defect with hydrometra and secondary infertility. A retrospective case series from an assisted reproductive center and infertility treatment clinic in the United Arab Emirates. We had five patients with secondary infertility diagnosed with cesarean section scar defect with persistent hydrometra based on high resolution transvaginal ultrasound assessment. The patients underwent surgical repair for the cesarean section scar defect followed by infertility treatment. Transvaginal ultrasound examination showed a normal endometrial cavity with triple lining endometrium and absence of hydrometra; and clinical pregnancy was the main outcome measure. Surgical correction of cesarean section scar defect was successfully performed in the cases presented. The patients had their fertility restored. Clinical studies revealed that cesarean section scar defect may lead to abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, pre-/post-menstrual spotting, heavy or prolonged menses, pelvic pain and secondary infertility. Theoretically, an inflammatory response, such as a wound healing process in the uterus due to hydrometra associated with scar defect may impair embryo implantation. The clinical case studies presented here are based on the correct diagnosis of the cesarean section scar defect with hydrometra and its successful surgical repair. The patients in our study had their symptoms resolved and attained clinical pregnancy.

Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar defects: Preoperative hysteroscopic evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Cesarean section scar defects (CSDs) are one of the long-term complications following cesarean section. They can be detected by transvaginal sonography, hysterosalpingography, sonohysterography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Hysteroscopy is frequently used in evaluating endometrial disease. However, the description of CSDs by hysteroscopy is very limited. Only a few papers about hysteroscopy evaluation have been published. This is an exploratory study to compare hysteroscopic findings with myometrial thickness and post-surgical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From February 2019 to December 2020, 143 women with CSDs were enrolled in the observational study. All women suffered from abnormal uterine bleeding and were evaluated in a standardized way with hysteroscopy before vaginal surgery. Dome-shaped CSDs could be clearly observed in all patients under hysteroscopy. We recorded the pictures of each patient under hysteroscopy and classified them. All patients underwent outpatient review at 3 and 6 months after surgery to obtain menstrual information and CSD scar size by MRI or transvaginal sonography. RESULTS: Pale mucosae in the defect were meager endometrial lining covering the surface of muscle layer, cyst lesions were some cyst lesions in the defect, increased local vascularization was a vascular tree with branching and irregular vascular distribution in defect, polypoid lesions were polypoid lesions in the defect, and serrated niches were two niches at the anterior uterine isthmus. The features of the CSDs observed under hysteroscopy were identified as five phenotypes: pale mucosae (90/143, 62.9%), cyst lesions (23/143, 16.1%), polypoid lesions (19/143, 13.3%), increased local vascularization (27/143, 18.9%) and serrated niches (7/143, 4.9%). The most common finding in scar defects under hysteroscopy was pale mucosae in the CSD. The results suggest that patients with increased local vascularization and serrated niches have a high risk of thinner residual myometrium before vaginal repair (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in menstrual duration or in the outcome of vaginal repair for CSDs between these five phenotypes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with the abnormal blood vessel or serration phenotypes of defects under hysteroscopy may have a thinner residual myometrium. The phenotypes of hysteroscopic findings of CSDs have no correlation with the outcome of repair.

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma in cesarean section scar isthmocele - case report.

OBJECTIVE: Cesarean section scar defect isthmocele, the pouchlike defect in the anterior uterine wall of the prior cesarean site. No previous report of malignant neoplasm in the isthmocele have been published. We reported a case of High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma in isthmocele. CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old patient with gravida 4, parity 2, two previous cesarean section presents of recurrent heavy vaginal bleeding. Curettage and hormone therapy were unsuccessful. She underwent hysteroscopic isthmoplasty. The pathology revealed high-grade sarcoma. Patient was referred to a tertiary medical center and she underwent total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, aortic & pelvic LNs dissection. The final diagnosis was High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS) stage IA (pT1a N0) involving isthmocele. CONCLUSION: The presence of this rare tumor in the isthmocele is very interested. We stress the necessity for a high degree of suspicion to diagnose the malignancy in perimenopausal women with isthmocele and persisted abnormal uterine bleeding.

Agreement between transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect.

OBJECTIVES: to assess the agreement between saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) and transvaginal sonography (TVS) in the evaluation of cesarean section scar defect (CSD) regarding its width, depth, and shape and also in assessing the anterior myometrium, and residual myometrium related to the scar. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a prospective study during the period between August 2017 and January 2018 was conducted in which 102 consecutive participants underwent primary cesarean section in Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital were assessed six weeks after CS to evaluate for CSD presence by using both SCSH and TVS. RESULTS: CSD could be detected only in 59.8% of women by TVS and 70.5% by SCSH with good agreement strength (Cohen kappa = 0.805). TVS was 84.72% sensitive and 100.00% specific in identifying CSD diagnosed by SCSH. The PPV, NPV, and accuracy of TVS were 100.00%, 73.17%, and 89.21%, respectively. The mean anterior myometrial thickness (AMT) did not differ when assessed by both TVS and SCSH, while the mean niche width was 2.56 ± 1.98 mm with SCSH compared to 2.17 ± 1.63 mm with TVS(r = 0.954), and its mean depth was 2.76 ± 2.02 mm for SCSH and 1.57 ± 1.51 mm in TVS(r = 0.812). The mean residual myometrium was 10.09 ± 2.74 mm in SCSH while was 11.18 ± 2.50 mm for TVS(r = 0.914) CONCLUSION: cesarean scar defects in non-pregnant women are better evaluated at SCSH than at unenhanced TVS as more defects detected by SCSH and better evaluation of its shape, borders and size.

Isthmocele: from risk factors to management / Istmocele: de fatores de risco ao manejo

Abstract Objective The aim of the present study was to perform a comprehensive review of the literature to provide a complete and clear picture of isthmocele-a hypoechoic area within themyometriumat the site of the uterine scar of a previous cesarean section-by exploring in depth every aspect of this condition. Methods A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to identify the most relevant studies about this topic. Results Every aspect of isthmocele has been studied and described: pathophysiology, clinical symptoms, classification, and diagnosis. Its treatment, both medical and surgical, has also been reported according to the actual literature data. Conclusion Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed worldwide, and one of the consequences of this technique is isthmocele. A single and systematic classification of isthmocele is needed to improve its diagnosis and management. Further studies should be performed to better understand its pathogenesis.

Resumo Objetivo O objetivo do presente estudo foi realizar uma revisão abrangente da literatura a fim de fornecer um quadro completo e claro da istmocele-uma área hipoecoica dentro domiométrio no local da cicatriz uterina de uma cesariana anterior- aprofundando todos os aspectos desta condição Métodos Uma revisão abrangente da literatura foi realizada para identificar os estudos mais relevantes sobre este tema. Resultados Todos os aspectos da istmocele foram estudados e descritos: fisiopatologia, sintomas clínicos, classificação e diagnóstico. Os tratamentos médico e cirúrgico também foram relatados de acordo com os dados reais da literatura. Conclusão A cesárea é o procedimento cirúrgico mais comum realizado em todo o mundo, e uma das consequências desta técnica é a istmocele. Uma classificação única e sistemática da istmocele é necessária para melhorar seu diagnóstico e manejo. Novos estudos devem ser realizados para melhor entender sua patogênese.

Clinical effect of hysteroscopic scar defect orthopedic surgery on cicatrical scar of uterine incision / 中国综合临床

Objective To explore the clinical effect of hysteroscopic scar defect correction in the treatment of cesarean scar.Methods Eighty-four cases patients with cesarean section uterine incision scars who were treated in Affiliated Hospital of Hubei Polytechnic University from August 2015 to July 2016 were selected and randomly divided into observation group with hysteroscopic surgery and control group with vaginal surgery,42 cases in each group.The operation condition,clinical efficacy and the incidence of complications of the two groups were observed and compared.Results The amomt of blood loss,hospitalization expenses,hospitalization time and operation time in the observation group were (22.45±3.78) ml,(3028.89±218.79) yuan,(3.89 ±0.80) d,(20.13±2.90) min respectively,in the control group were (40.56±5.48) ml,(4189.58±269.78)yuan,(5.46 ± 1.02) d,(30.78 ± 6.99) min respectively,the differences were significant (P ＞ 0.05).The incidence of infection,relapse and incisional wound healing in the observation group were significantly lower than in the control group,the differences were significant (P＜0.05).The total effective rate was 90.48％ in the observation group and 85.71％ in the control group after treatment,the difference was not significant(P ＞0.05).Conclusion Hysteroscopic scar repair has the same effect as that of vaginal surgery,but the rate of blood loss and complication is lower than that of vaginal operation,which is safer and more effective.

Vaginal Repair of Cesarean Section Scar Diverticula that Resulted in Improved Postoperative Menstruation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Owing to the increase in cesarean sections (C-sections) worldwide, long-term complications such as postmenstrual spotting, chronic pelvic pain, and C-section scar ectopic pregnancies have created a new medical era of gynecologic disease. A new type of vaginal repair is evaluated to repair C-section diverticulum (CSD) and rebuild the muscular layer to improve symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding and decrease the risk of uterine rupture. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 121 patients with CSD diagnoses by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) presented with postmenstrual spotting between June 2012 and March 2015. All patients had undergone at least 1 C-section delivery and had no history of postmenstrual spotting before undergoing C-section. INTERVENTION: Vaginal excision and suture of CSD. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean duration of menstruation was 14.87 ± 3.46 days preoperatively and decreased to 8.22 ± 2.73 days at 1 month after surgery, 8.89 ± 2.67 days at 3 months after surgery, and 9.02 ± 2.47 days at 6 months after surgery (p < .01). The length, width, depth, and thickness of the remaining muscular layer (TRM) at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months assessed by TVU also improved significantly after surgery (p < .05). However, postoperative menstruation and imaging data did not differ markedly between 3 months and 6 months, suggesting that follow-up at 3 months represents an adequate endpoint for evaluating the effectiveness of surgery. At 6 months, 80.3% of patients (94 of 117) reached ≤10 days of menstruation. Further study revealed that a TRM at 6 months of ≥8.5 mm measured by TVU (relative risk [RR], 6.418; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.478-28.443) and an interval between CS and vaginal repair of ≤2.5 years (RR, 12.0; 95% CI, 1.541- 93.454) were good prognostic factors associated with surgery. CONCLUSION: Vaginal repair of CSD improved the symptoms of postmenstrual spotting and anatomically corrected the scars. An interval between C-section and a surgery of ≤2.5 years was optimal for vaginal repair, and a TRM at 6 months of ≥8.5 mm represented the standard healing of CSD.

Current Status and Progress on Management of Cesarean Section Scar Defect / 中国微创外科杂志

[Summary] Cesarean section scar defect is one of the most common long-term complications after cesarean section .However the indications and efficacy judgment are not definite .The main managements include medical and surgical interventions .The drug generally used in medical management is oral contraceptives , and the surgical management includes vaginal repair of cesarean section scar defect and hysteroscopic or laparoscopic repair of the defect .To minimize the incidence of cesarean section scar defect , the surgical indications should be strictly followed and the operation should be carefully performed , including application of aseptic techniques , complete removal of decidua and placental tissues , effective hemostasis , and proper suturing .