Comparison of ultrasound risk stratification systems for pediatric thyroid nodules.

Background: There is currently insufficient data to validate adult-based US risk stratification systems (RSSs) for the identification of malignant thyroid nodules in a pediatric population. Methods: From October 2016 and May 2023, 173 thyroid nodules of pediatric patients (age ≤ 18 years) with definitive pathology results and ultrasound (US) examination within 1 month before surgery or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy in our institution were enrolled in this study. The clinical and US characteristics of these nodules were retrospectively reviewed and categorized according to the ACR-TIRADS, C-TIRADS, and ATA guidelines. The diagnostic performance of US-based FNA criteria (original and simulating) of the three guidelines in thyroid cancer detection was estimated. Results: The three RSSs had similar AUC according to the categories(0.849-0.852, all P > 0.05). When combined with the original FNA criteria of the three RSSs to manage the nodules, the FNA rate of ACR-TIRADS and C-TIRADS were significantly less than ATA guidelines (53.18% vs. 64.63%, P < 0.05, and 52.60% vs. 64.63%, P < 0.05). The missed malignancy rate (MMR) and unnecessary FNA rate (UFR) of ATA guidelines (50.00%, 35.85%) was highest among the three RSSs, followed by the C-TIRADS (37.80%, 19.57%) and the ACR-TIRADS (37.04%, 19.57%). When nodules < 1 cm with the highest category in each RSS biopsied, that is when using the simulating FNA thresholds, the MMR was reduced overall (all P < 0.001), without a change in the UFR (all P > 0.05). All the three RSSs showed a substantial improvement in accuracy and malignant detection rate (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: The ACR-TIRADS, C-TIRADS, and ATA guidelines showed high missed malignancy rates when using their original recommended FNA criteria. When nodules < 1 cm with the highest category in each RSS biopsied, the missed malignancy rate of each RSS was decreased. Decreasing the FNA thresholds for highly suspicious malignant nodules may therefore be an effective means of managing malignant thyroid nodules in pediatric patients.

Comparison of the C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and ATA guidelines in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules.

Background: To compare the diagnostic performance in determining the malignancy of thyroid nodules and the fine needle aspiration (FNA) recommendations of the guidelines set forth by the Superficial Organ and Vascular Ultrasound Group of the Society of Ultrasound in Medicine of the Chinese Medical Association in 2020 [2020 Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS)], the American College of Radiology in 2017 (2017 ACR-TIRADS) and the American Thyroid Association in 2015 (2015 ATA guidelines). Methods: From January 2021 to December 2021, 1,228 thyroid nodules with definitive postoperative histopathology and ultrasound (US) examination within 3 months before surgery in Shantou Central Hospital were enrolled in this study. We collected the data in 2022. The participants formed a consecutive series. The clinical and US features of the nodules were retrospectively reviewed and categorized according to the 2020 C-TIRADS, the 2017 ACR-TIRADS and the 2015 ATA guidelines. The diagnostic performance and unnecessary FNA rates of the three guidelines were calculated. Results: The 2017 ACR-TIRADS had the highest diagnostic performance [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.938], followed by the 2020 C-TIRADS (AUROC 0.933) and the 2015 ATA guidelines (AUROC 0.928). The ATA guidelines had the highest specificity (93.38%), accuracy (92.10%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (80.56%) among the three guidelines. There were no significant differences in the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) among the three guidelines. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of the FNA recommendations based on the C-TIRADS were 84.25%, 58.76%, 38.92%, 92.28% and 64.82%, respectively, which were higher than those of the ACR-TIRADS (57.53%, 42.94%, 23.93%, 76.43% and 46.42%, respectively) and the ATA guidelines (62.67%, 13.25%, 18.39%, 53.22% and 25.00%, respectively). Compared with the ACR-TIRADS (76.07%) and the ATA guidelines (81.61%), the C-TIRADS showed advantages in the unnecessary FNA rate (61.08%), especially in nodules larger than 20 mm. Conclusions: The 2020 C-TIRADS, the 2017 ACR-TIRADS and the 2015 ATA guidelines can effectively predict the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. Compared with the 2017 ACR-TIRADS and the 2015 ATA guidelines, the 2020 C-TIRADS may offer a meaningful reduction in FNA recommendations with the highest efficacy in distinguishing thyroid carcinoma.

Ultrasonic follow-up observation on size changes of 4C type thyroid micronodule classified by C-TIRADS / 中华健康管理学杂志

Objective:To observe the size changes under ultrasound of 4C type thyroid micronodules classified by 2020 Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS)during follow-up.Methods:In this cross-sectional study, the data of thyroid ultrasonography in physical examination center in the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University between December 2017 and December 2021 were retrospectively included, thyroid nodules were classified according to C-TIRADS, to observe the changes by ultrasound of maximum diameter and volume of 4C type thyroid micronodules during follow-up.Results:A total of 102 subjects receiving physical examinations with 103 thyroid micronodules were enrolled in this study. The maximum diameter and volume of thyroid micronodules at initial examination was 5.0 (4.0, 7.0) mm and 52.5 (25.2, 113.4) mm 3 respectively, and it was 6.0 (4.0,7.0) mm、65.6 (25.2,147.0) mm 3 at the last examination, respectively. Of the thyroid micronodules, 79 (76.7%) remained stable, 14 (13.6%) magnified and 10 (9.7%) shrunk during the follow-up. The cervical lymph nodes in all physical examiners were normal. There were significant changes in the maximum diameter and volume in the thyroid micronodules between the initial and last examination in subjects whose micronodules shrunk or magnified during the follow-up (all P<0.05). Conclusion:Size of most C-TIRADS 4C thyroid micronodules remains stable or even decreases during ultrasound follow-up observation, for such thyroid nodules, follow-up observation appears to be a safe and feasible way to postpone surgery.

Diagnostic Value of American Thyroid Association Guidelines,American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System,and Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Alone and Combined With BRAFV600E Mutation in Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance / 中国医学科学院学报

Objective To explore the diagnostic efficacy of American Thyroid Association(ATA)guidelines,American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System(ACR-TIRADS),and Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System(C-TIRADS)alone and combined with BRAFV600E mutation in atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance(AUS/FLUS).Methods A total of 138 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration(FNA)in the Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2020 to May 2023 were selected.The clinicopathological and ultrasound characteristics were retrospectively analyzed for each nodule.Each nodule underwent preoperative BRAFV600E mutation testing and was diagnosed according to the ATA guidelines,ACR-TIRADS,and C-TIRADS.The diagnostic efficacy of ATA guidelines,ACR-TIRADS,and C-TIRADS alone and combined with BRAFV600E mutation was assessed based on the results of histopathological diagnosis.Results The 138 AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules included 45(32.6%)benign ones and 93(67.4%)malignant ones.The patient age(t=1.444,P=0.151),gender(χ2=0.259,P=0.611),and location of nodules(χ2=2.055,P=0.358)had no statistical significance for the differentiation between benign and malignant nodules,while nodule size(Z=2.500,P=0.012),echo(χ2=14.693,P<0.001),composition(χ2=17.075,P<0.001),aspect ratio ≥1(χ2=9.477,P=0.002),and microcalcification(χ2=6.892,P=0.009)were of significance for the differentiation.When applied alone,BRAFV600E mutation showed high specificity(95.56%)and positive predictive value(95.65%).Among the three ultrasound grading systems,ACR-TIRADS had the highest sensitivity(χ2=37.923,P<0.001;χ2=40.462,P<0.001)and accuracy(χ2=81.595,P<0.001;χ2=76.912,P<0.001),while C-TIRADS had the highest specificity(χ2=11.746,P<0.001;χ2=21.235,P<0.001).However,the three systems showed no statistically significant difference in the diagnostic efficiency when applied alone(Z=1.177,P=0.239;Z=0.213,P=0.831;Z=1.016,P=0.310).The combination of BRAFV600E mutation with ACR-TIRADS or C-TIRADS improved the diagnostic efficacy of BRAFV600E mutation in distinguishing the benign and malignant AUS/FLUS nodules(Z=2.107,P=0.035;Z=2.752,P=0.006).The combination of ATA guidelines with BRAFV600E mutation increased the diagnostic accuracy of BRAFV600E mutation(χ2=20.679,P<0.001),while it had no statistically significant difference in distinguishing the benign and malignant AUS/FLUS nodules(Z=1.321,P=0.186).The combination of ATA guidelines,ACR-TIRADS,or C-TIRADS with BRAFV600E mutation improved the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound grading systems for AUS/FLUS nodules(Z=2.770,P=0.006;Z=2.770,P=0.006;Z=2.890,P=0.004).Specifically,ACR-TIRADS combined with BRAFV600E mutation showed the highest sensitivity(χ2=4.712,P=0.030;χ2=4.712,P=0.030),while C-TIRADS combined with BRAFV600E mutation showed the highest accuracy(χ2=77.627,P<0.001;χ2=85.827,P<0.001).However,there were no statistically significant differences in diagnostic performance between the combinations(Z=1.276,P=0.202;Z=0.808,P=0.419;Z=1.615,P=0.106).Conclusion ATA guidelines,ACR-TIRADS,and C-TIRADS combined with BRAFV600E mutation can improve the diagnostic efficacy of BRAFV600E mutation or ultrasound grading system alone in AUS/FLUS nodules,which can facilitate the further management and treatment of such patients.

[Diagnostic Value of American Thyroid Association Guidelines,American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System,and Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Alone and Combined With BRAFV600E Mutation in Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance].

Objective To explore the diagnostic efficacy of American Thyroid Association(ATA)guidelines,American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System(ACR-TIRADS),and Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System(C-TIRADS)alone and combined with BRAFV600E mutation in atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance(AUS/FLUS).Methods A total of 138 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration(FNA)in the Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2020 to May 2023 were selected.The clinicopathological and ultrasound characteristics were retrospectively analyzed for each nodule.Each nodule underwent preoperative BRAFV600E mutation testing and was diagnosed according to the ATA guidelines,ACR-TIRADS,and C-TIRADS.The diagnostic efficacy of ATA guidelines,ACR-TIRADS,and C-TIRADS alone and combined with BRAFV600E mutation was assessed based on the results of histopathological diagnosis.Results The 138 AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules included 45(32.6%)benign ones and 93(67.4%)malignant ones.The patient age(t=1.444,P=0.151),gender(χ2=0.259,P=0.611),and location of nodules(χ2=2.055,P=0.358)had no statistical significance for the differentiation between benign and malignant nodules,while nodule size(Z=2.500,P=0.012),echo(χ2=14.693,P<0.001),composition(χ2=17.075,P<0.001),aspect ratio ≥1(χ2=9.477,P=0.002),and microcalcification(χ2=6.892,P=0.009)were of significance for the differentiation.When applied alone,BRAFV600E mutation showed high specificity(95.56%)and positive predictive value(95.65%).Among the three ultrasound grading systems,ACR-TIRADS had the highest sensitivity(χ2=37.923,P<0.001;χ2=40.462,P<0.001)and accuracy(χ2=81.595,P<0.001;χ2=76.912,P<0.001),while C-TIRADS had the highest specificity(χ2=11.746,P<0.001;χ2=21.235,P<0.001).However,the three systems showed no statistically significant difference in the diagnostic efficiency when applied alone(Z=1.177,P=0.239;Z=0.213,P=0.831;Z=1.016,P=0.310).The combination of BRAFV600E mutation with ACR-TIRADS or C-TIRADS improved the diagnostic efficacy of BRAFV600E mutation in distinguishing the benign and malignant AUS/FLUS nodules(Z=2.107,P=0.035;Z=2.752,P=0.006).The combination of ATA guidelines with BRAFV600E mutation increased the diagnostic accuracy of BRAFV600E mutation(χ2=20.679,P<0.001),while it had no statistically significant difference in distinguishing the benign and malignant AUS/FLUS nodules(Z=1.321,P=0.186).The combination of ATA guidelines,ACR-TIRADS,or C-TIRADS with BRAFV600E mutation improved the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound grading systems for AUS/FLUS nodules(Z=2.770,P=0.006;Z=2.770,P=0.006;Z=2.890,P=0.004).Specifically,ACR-TIRADS combined with BRAFV600E mutation showed the highest sensitivity(χ2=4.712,P=0.030;χ2=4.712,P=0.030),while C-TIRADS combined with BRAFV600E mutation showed the highest accuracy(χ2=77.627,P<0.001;χ2=85.827,P<0.001).However,there were no statistically significant differences in diagnostic performance between the combinations(Z=1.276,P=0.202;Z=0.808,P=0.419;Z=1.615,P=0.106).Conclusion ATA guidelines,ACR-TIRADS,and C-TIRADS combined with BRAFV600E mutation can improve the diagnostic efficacy of BRAFV600E mutation or ultrasound grading system alone in AUS/FLUS nodules,which can facilitate the further management and treatment of such patients.

Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules (C-TIRADS 4) by Combining Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Diagnosis Model With Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Objectives: To establish a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) diagnostic schedule by CEUS analysis of thyroid nodules of C-TIRADS 4. To establish a CEUS-TIRADS diagnostic model to differentiate thyroid nodules (C-TIRADS 4) by combining CEUS with Chinese thyroid imaging reporting and data system (C-TIRADS). Methods: A total of 228 thyroid nodules (C-TIRADS 4) were estimated by CEUS. The arrival time, enhancement degree, enhancement homogeneity, enhancement pattern, enhancement ring, and wash-out time were analyzed in CEUS for all of the nodules. Multivariate factors logistic analysis was performed and a CEUS diagnostic schedule was established. If the nodule had a regular hyper-enhancement ring or got a score of less than 2 in CEUS analysis, CEUS-TIRADS subtracted 1 category. If the nodule got a score of 2 in the CEUS schedule, the CEUS-TIRADS category remained the same as before. If the nodule got a score of more than 2 in the CEUS schedule, CEUS-TIRADS added 1 category. When it reflected an absent enhancement in CEUS, the nodule was judged as CEUS-TIRADS 3. All of the C-TIRADS 4 nodules were re-graded by CEUS-TIRADS. We then compare the diagnosis performance of C-TIRADS, CEUS, and CEUS-TIRADS by sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results: Among the 228 C-TIRADS 4 nodules, 69 were determined as C-TIRADS 4a, 114 were C-TIRADS 4b, and 45 were C-TIRADS 4c. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of C-TIRADS were 93.1%, 55.3%, and 74.6% respectively. The area under the curve was 0.753. Later arrival time, hypo-enhancement, heterogeneous enhancement, centripetal enhancement, and rapid washout were risk factors of malignancy in multivariate analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS were 78.7%, 87.5%, and 83.3% respectively. The area under the curve was 0.803. By CEUS-TIRADS diagnostic model combining CEUS with C-TIRADS, a total of 127 cases were determined as malignancy (111 were malignant and 16 were benign) and 101 were diagnosed as benign ones (5 were malignant and 96 were benign). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS-TIRADS were 95.7%, 85.7%, and 92.1% respectively. The area under the curve was 0.916. The diagnostic performance of CEUS-TIRADS was significantly better than CEUS and C-TIRADS. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: The diagnostic schedule of CEUS could get better diagnostic performance than US in the differentiation of thyroid nodules. The CEUS-TIRADS combining CEUS analysis with C-TIRADS could make up for the deficient sensibility of C-TIRADS, showing a better diagnostic performance than US and CEUS.

Comparative analysis of C-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules / 中华健康管理学杂志

Objective:To investigate the diagnostic efficiency of the 2020 Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) and the 2017 American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.Methods:A retrospective analysis of the two-dimensional ultrasound image results of 324 thyroid nodules in 289 patients with thyroid nodules and thyroid nodules were performed in the physical examination of the Health Management Department of the Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital from January 2018 to January 2019. A superficial professional doctor with a senior professional title simultaneously uses the C-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS methods to evaluate the above nodules. The results are all pathologically referenced for the χ2 test and the receiver operating characteristic curve is drawn. Results:The sensitivity of C-TIRADS in diagnosing benign and malignant thyroid nodules was 81.90%, specificity was 97.72%, accuracy was 92.59%, negative predictive value was 91.85%, positive predictive value was 84.51%; ACR-TIRADS diagnosis The sensitivity of benign and malignant thyroid nodules was 59.05%, specificity was 99.54%, accuracy was 86.42%, negative predictive value was 83.52%, and positive predictive value was 98.41%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.958 and 0.935( Z=2.31 P=0.021). Conclusion:C-TIRADS classification based on counting method is better than ACR-TIRADS classification based on sub-method in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. It has better efficacy and is more suitable for the current status of diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules in China.

The diagnostic value of Chinese-thyroid imaging reporting and data system classification combined with shear wave elastography in thyroid microcarcinoma / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective:To investigate the diagnostic value of Chinese-thyroid imaging reporting and data system (C-TIRADS) combined with shear wave elastography (SWE) in thyroid microcarcinoma.Methods:The clinical data of 270 patients (367 nodules) who underwent thyroid ultrasound examination and confirmed by pathology from January 2019 to June 2021 in the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were assisted by SWE in preoperative ultrasound examination to measure the maximum elastic modulus (E max), the average elastic modulus (E mean) and the minimum elastic modulus (E min). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to get the optimal threshold of SWE according to the pathological results. The diagnostic value of C-TIRADS, SWE and their combined in different diameters thyroid micronodules was analyzed. Results:Among 367 thyroid nodules, 119 nodules were benign and 248 nodules were malignant. The area under the curve (AUC) of E max in diagnosing TMC was significantly larger than that of E mean and E min (0.883 vs. 0.822 and 0.706), and there was statistical difference ( P<0.05); the best cut-off value of E max was 29.5 kPa. The ROC curve analysis results showed that the AUC of C-TIRADS combined with SWE in diagnosis of TMC was significantly larger than that of C-TIRADS and SWE alone (0.884 vs. 0.800 and 0.853), and there was statistical difference ( P<0.05); the sensitivity, accuracy and negative predictive value of C-TIRADS combined with SWE in diagnosis of TMC were significantly higher than those of C-TIRADS alone (90.32% vs. 80.24%, 89.10% vs. 80.11% and 81.10% vs. 65.97%), and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). Thyroid nodules were divided into ≤0.5 cm nodules (56 nodules) and 0.5 to 1.0 cm nodules (311 nodules) according to the maximum diameter, the sensitivity and accuracy of C-TIRADS combined with SWE in diagnosing TMC in 0.5 to 1.0 cm nodules were significantly higher than those in ≤0.5 cm nodules: 91.82% (202/220) vs. 78.57% (22/28) and 90.68% (282/311) vs. 80.36% (45/56), and there were statistical differences ( χ2 = 4.99 and 5.20, P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference in specificity between 2 groups ( P<0.05). Conclusions:C-TIRADS combined with SWE can further improve the diagnostic value of TMC, which is worth popularizing and applying in clinic.

Diagnostic performance of US-based FNAB criteria of the 2020 Chinese guideline for malignant thyroid nodules: comparison with the 2017 American College of Radiology guideline, the 2015 American Thyroid Association guideline, and the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association guideline.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the diagnostic performance of the ultrasonography-based fine-needle aspiration biopsy criteria of the Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) for malignant nodules compared to 3 other guidelines. METHODS: This study included 2,309 thyroid nodules in 1,697 patients with histopathological and cytopathological diagnoses of benign and malignant nodules from January 2018 to August 2020. The clinical and ultrasonographic features of the nodules were retrospectively reviewed and classified according to the Chinese guideline (C-TIRADS), the American College of Radiology guideline (ACR-TIRADS), the American Thyroid Association guideline (ATA guideline), and the Korean Thyroid Association guideline (K-TIRADS). The diagnostic performance of the guidelines and their unnecessary fine-needle aspiration biopsy rates were calculated using randomized, blinded trials. RESULTS: Of the 2,309 nodules, 1,418 (61.4%) were benign and 891 (38.6%) were malignant, with 884 (99.21%) papillary carcinomas. The accuracy of C-TIRADS was 84.71%, followed by the guidelines of ACR-TIRADS (82.11%), K-TIRADS (81.64%), and the ATA guideline (78.56%). Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was the highest for the C-TIRADS (0.905). Similar results were revealed for both the diagnostic performance and AUC of nodules smaller and larger than 10 mm. The ACR-TIRADS showed the lowest unnecessary biopsy rate (17.54%), followed by the C-TIRADS (22.61%), ATA guideline (27.90%), and the K-TIRADS (28.67%). CONCLUSIONS: The C-TIRADS demonstrated high diagnostic performance and a relatively low unnecessary biopsy rate in detecting thyroid cancer compared to the 3 other guidelines. However, further understanding of the ultrasonography-based fine-needle aspiration biopsy criteria of the C-TIRADS should be gained in the future.