Discordant structural chromosomal aberrations in chorionic villi and amniotic fluid leading to a formation of an isochromosome 21: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Fetoplacental discrepancies occur in approximately 1-2% of analyzed prenatal cases. They are typically due to confined placental mosaicism, where an aberration is observed in the placental cells but not found in the fetal cells. Confined placental mosaicism usually involves aneuploidies and more sparsely structural chromosomal aberrations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a discrepancy in the analyses of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis involving two different structural chromosomal aberrations of chromosome 21. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 33-year-old woman who was referred for a non-invasive prenatal testing due to an increased risk of trisomy 21 gleaned from a combined ultrasound and blood test. The non-invasive prenatal testing showed an increased risk of trisomy 21 with a normalized coverage signal that did not match the fetal cell-free DNA fraction. Rapid aneuploidy detection performed on uncultured chorionic villi indicated mosaicism for trisomy 21. The follow-up analyses revealed discordant chromosomal aberrations: 46,XY,der(21)t(10;21)(p11.21;q10) in the analysis of the chorionic villus sampling and 46,XY, + 21,der(21;21)(q10;q10) in the analysis of the amniocentesis. Thus, the analyses indicated mosaicism for a cell line containing trisomy 21 and a cell line containing a partially duplicated short arm of chromosome 10 in the chorionic villi and complete trisomy 21 resulting from an isochromosome 21 in the amniotic fluid. The analyses of the lymphocytes and the fibroblasts of the woman were normal. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a multiple-step mechanism as a possible theoretical explanation for the formation of these discordant structural chromosomal aberrations in the chorionic villi and amniotic fluid. With this case report, we want to highlight the importance of understanding the possible underlying embryological mechanisms when interpreting results from different prenatal analyses.

Confined placental mosaicism and the association with pregnancy outcome and fetal growth: a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal mosaicism can be detected in different stages of early life: in cleavage stage embryos, in blastocysts and biopsied cells from blastocysts during preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) and later during prenatal testing, as well as after birth in cord blood. Mosaicism at all different stages can be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. There is an onward discussion about whether blastocysts diagnosed as chromosomally mosaic by PGT-A should be considered safe for transfer. An accurate diagnosis of mosaicism remains technically challenging and the fate of abnormal cells within an embryo remains largely unknown. However, if aneuploid cells persist in the extraembryonic tissues, they can give rise to confined placental mosaicism (CPM). Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) uses cell-free (cf) DNA released from the placenta in maternal blood, facilitating the detection of CPM. In literature, conflicting evidence is found about whether CPM is associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR) and/or other pregnancy outcomes. This makes counselling for patients by clinicians challenging and more knowledge is needed for clinical decision and policy making. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The objective of this review is to evaluate the association between CPM and prenatal growth and adverse pregnancy outcomes. All relevant literature has been reviewed in order to achieve an overview on merged results exploring the relation between CPM and FGR and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: The following Medical Subject Headings (MESH) terms and all their synonyms were used: placental, trophoblast, cytotrophoblast, mosaicism, trisomy, fetal growth, birth weight, small for gestational age and fetal development. A search in Embase, PubMed, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Google Scholar databases was conducted. Relevant articles published until 16 July 2020 were critically analyzed and discussed. OUTCOMES: There were 823 articles found and screened based on their title/abstract. From these, 213 articles were selected and full text versions were obtained for a second selection, after which 70 publications were included and 328 cases (fetuses) were analyzed. For CPM in eight different chromosomes (of the total 14 analyzed), there was sufficient evidence that birth weight was often below the 5th percentile of fetal growth standards. FGR was reported in 71.7% of CPM cases and preterm birth (<37 weeks of delivery) was reported in 31.0% of cases. A high rate of structural fetal anomalies, 24.2%, in cases with CPM was also identified. High levels of mosaicism in CVS and presence of uniparental disomy (UPD) were significantly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Based on the literature, the advice to clinicians is to monitor fetal growth intensively from first trimester onwards in case of CPM, especially when chromosome 2, 3, 7, 13, 15, 16 and 22 are involved. In addition to this, it is advised to examine the fetuses thoroughly for structural fetal anomalies and raise awareness of a higher chance of (possibly extreme) premature birth. Despite prematurity in nearly a fifth of cases, the long-term follow-up of CPM life borns seems to be positive. More understanding of the biological mechanisms behind CPM will help in prioritizing embryos for transfer after the detection of mosaicism in embryos through PGT-A.

Ante-natal counseling in phacomatoses.

OBJECTIVES: Phacomatoses are a group of neuro-oculo-cutaneous syndromes/ neurocutaneous disorders, involving structures arising from the embryonic ectoderm. Most of phacomatoses including the most common ones:, neurofibromatosis type I and type II (NF1, NF2) and tuberosclerosis complex (TSC), are autosomal dominant genetic disorders with full penetrance and variable expression. As no effective treatment exists, the only way to prevent the disease, is by prenatal genetic diagnosis (either chorionic villus sampling-CVS or amniocentesis-AC) and termination of pregnancy or performing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). As the risk for an affected offspring is 50% in every pregnancy of an affected parent, prenatal, and preimplantation testing are of great importance. However, those procedures are associated with technical and ethical concerns. This chapter shortly reviews the common phacomatoses emphasizes their genetics and inheritance. We will review the common methods for prenatal and preimplantation diagnoses and discuss its use in common phacomatoses. CONCLUSION: Phacomatoses are common autosomal dominant genetic conditions with variable expression. Ante-natal genetic diagnosis is an appropriate approach for family planning in individuals affected by phacomatosis or parents of an affected child.

Do fetal extravillous trophoblasts circulate in maternal blood postpartum?

INTRODUCTION: Circulating fetal extravillous trophoblasts may offer a superior alternative to cell-free fetal DNA for noninvasive prenatal testing. Cells of fetal origin are a pure source of fetal genome; hence, unlike the cell-free noninvasive prenatal test, the fetal cell-based noninvasive prenatal test is not expected to be affected by maternal DNA. However, circulating fetal cells from previous pregnancies may lead to confounding results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To study whether fetal trophoblast cells persist in maternal circulation postpartum, blood samples were collected from 11 women who had given birth to a boy, with blood sampling at 1-3 days (W0), 4-5 weeks (W4-5), around 8 weeks (W8) and around 12 weeks (W12) postpartum. The existence of fetal extravillous trophoblasts was verified either by X and Y chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis or by short tandem repeat analysis. To exclude technological bias in isolating fetal cells, blood samples were also collected from 10 pregnant women between a gestational age of 10 and 14 weeks, the optimal time frame for cell-based noninvasive prenatal test sampling. All the samples were processed according to protocols established by ARCEDI Biotech for fetal extravillous trophoblast enrichment and isolation. RESULTS: Fetal extravillous trophoblasts were found in all the 10 samples from pregnant women between a gestational age of 10 and 14 weeks. However, only 4 of 11 blood samples taken from women at 1-3 days postpartum rendered fetal extravillous trophoblasts, and only 2 of 11 samples rendered fetal extravillous trophoblasts at 4 weeks postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary dataset on few pregnancies, none of the samples rendered any fetal cells at or after 8 weeks postpartum, showing that cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing based on fetal extravillous trophoblasts is unlikely to be influenced by circulating cells from previous pregnancies.

Abortion for Fetal Genetic Abnormalities: Type of Abnormality and Gestational Age at Diagnosis.

Background Advances in genetic screening can identify patients at high risk for common genetic conditions early in pregnancy and can facilitate early diagnosis and early abortion. Less common abnormalities might only be diagnosed with invasive testing is performed after structural abnormalities are identified. Objective Our objective was to compare gestational age (GA) at diagnosis and abortion for genetic abnormalities identified based on screening with abnormalities that were not discovered after screening. Study Design All prenatal diagnostic procedures from 2012 to 2017 were reviewed, and singleton pregnancies terminated following diagnosis of genetic abnormalities were identified. Cases diagnosed as the result of screening tests were compared with remaining cases. Conditions were considered "screened for" if they can be suspected by cell-free DNA testing, biochemistry, carrier screening, or if the patient was a known carrier of a single-gene disorder. When abnormal karyotype, microarray, or Noonan's syndrome was associated with abnormal NT, these cases were considered "screened for." GA at abortion was the primary outcome. Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney's U test were used for statistical comparison. Results In this study, 268 cases were included. A total of 227 (85%) of abortions were performed for "screened for" disorders, with 210 (93%) of these for karyotype abnormalities, 5 (2%) for microarray abnormalities, and 12 (5%) for single-gene disorders. Forty-one (15%) of abortions were performed for conditions not included in screening, with 8 (19%) of those for karyotype abnormalities, 25 (61%) for microarray abnormalities, and 8 (19%) for single-gene disorders. Invasive testing and abortion occurred at earlier median GA for those with conditions that were screened for: 12 2/7 versus 15 5/7 weeks, p ≤0.001 and 13 5/7 versus 20 0/7 weeks; p ≤0.001. Conclusion Most abortions were for abnormalities that can be suspected early in pregnancy. As many structural abnormalities associated with rare conditions are not identifiable until the mid-trimester, prenatal diagnosis and abortion occurred significantly later. Physicians and patients should be aware of the limitations of genetic screening.

A New Stepwise Molecular Work-Up After Chorionic Villi Sampling in Women With an Early Pregnancy Loss.

Objective: To explore the use of a new molecular work-up based on the stepwise use of Quantitative Fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) extended to eight chromosomes and single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) in chorionic villi obtained by chorionic villi sampling (CVS) offered to women experiencing an early pregnancy loss. Methods: During a 3-year period (January 2016-December 2018), CVS was offered to women experiencing an early pregnancy loss before the evacuation of the products of conception (POC) to retrieve chorionic villi, irrespective of the number of previous losses. A new molecular work-up was prospectively assayed encompassing a first QF-PCR round (with the 21, 18, 13, 7, X, and Y chromosomes), a second QF-PCR round (with the 15, 16, and 22 chromosomes), and a high resolution SNP-array in those cases with normal QF-PCR results. A control group in which POC were collected after surgical uterine evacuation was used to be compared with the intervention group. Results: Around 459 women were enrolled in the intervention group (CVS) and 185 in the control group (POC after uterine evacuation). The QF-PCR testing success rates were significantly higher in the intervention group (98.5%: 452/459) as compared to the control group (74%: 109/147; p < 0.001), while the chromosomal anomaly rate at the two QF-PCR rounds was similar between the two groups: 52% (234/452) in the intervention and 42% (46/109) in the control group (p = 0.073). The SNP-array was performed in 202 QF-PCR normal samples of the intervention group and revealed 67 (33%) atypical chromosomal anomalies (>10 Mb), 5 (2.5%) submicroscopic pathogenic copy number variants, and 2 (1%) variant of uncertain significance (VOUS). Conclusion: Eighty-two percent of women experiencing an early pregnancy loss opted for a CVS. The testing success rates were higher in the intervention group (CVS; 98%) as compared to the control group (POC; 74%). The overall yields were 52% by QF-PCR (including three complete hydatiform moles), and 16% by SNP-array, including 15% atypical chromosomal anomalies and 1.1% submicroscopic pathogenic copy number variants.

[Contribution of array CGH in the management of fetal nuchal translucency]. / L'apport de l'ACPA dans la prise en charge des hyperclartés nucales.

OBJECTIVES: Increased nuchal translucency and cystic hygroma have a neonatal prognosis, when the karyotype is normal, which depends on the findings during the medical follow-up. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) has been systematically included in this follow-up by prenatal diagnosis teams. There are no guidelines and little information on the advantages of carrying out this test systematically. The aim of our study is to evaluate the contribution of the aCGH in the medical follow-up. METHODS: Fifty-one patients were included during 18 months and followed till the end of their pregnancy in prenatal diagnosis centers in Brest and Amiens. Inclusion criterion was a nuchal translucency above 3,5mm on the first trimester ultrasound. A fetal DNA ChromoQuant and aCGH analysis on chorionic villi sampling, and an ultrasound at 18 weeks of gestation were performed during the follow-up. RESULTS: The aCGH was decisive in only 2 cases. The ultrasound at 18 weeks gestation seemed to be more sensible in the detection of an abnormality. When the aCGH relieved an abnormality, the ultrasound permitted already to detect the presence of a deformity. In 10 cases, the aCGH could not be interpreted on the chorionic villi sampling. In 9 cases, an amniocentesis was performed in order to obtain this result. CONCLUSION: Given the results of this study, the aCGH was rarely determinant or decisive on the realization of a therapeutic abortion. These elements make us reflect on the necessity of maintaining this test before 14 weeks of gestation or propose it as a second-line test after the ultrasound shows signs at 18weeks of gestation.

First-trimester chorionic villus sampling: genetic analysis of 985 cases / 中华围产医学杂志

Objective@#To investigate the value and safety of first-trimester chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in prenatal diagnosis.@*Methods@#This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 985 cases undergoing CVS and prenatal diagnosis with karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Peking University First Hospital from January 2012 to December 2017. The success rate of cell culture, indications for prenatal diagnosis, karyotyping results, and complications of CVS were described.@*Results@#Among the 985 cases, 970 (98.48%) underwent FISH and 893 (90.66%) received karyotyping, and 878 (89.14%) accepted both. After CVS, the success rate of cell culture was 96.64% (863/893). Abnormal ultrasonographic findings (42.64%, 420/985) were the most common indications for prenatal diagnosis. In this study, 181 cases of chromosomal abnormalities were detected, including numerical and structural abnormalities, accounting for 18.38% of all 985 cases. Those cases with abnormal ultrasonographic images had the highest detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities (31.90%, 134/420), followed by those with adverse pregnant history (11.83%, 20/169) and advanced maternal age (8.21%, 11/134). In addition, there was a discrepancy between karyotyping and FISH results, which might due to 16 cases of placental mosaicism and 13 cases of maternal cell contamination (MCC). Embryonic demises were reported in six cases (0.61%, 6/985), including four with chromosomal numerical abnormalities within four weeks after CVS. No other short- or long-term postoperative complications were found in the rest 979 cases (99.39%).@*Conclusions@#CVS in the first trimester is a safe and reliable invasive method for prenatal diagnosis, which can help to obtain an earlier diagnosis in a certain population such as those with abnormal ultrasonographic findings, thus improve the pertinence and efficiency of prenatal diagnosis. However, the potential influences of placental mosaicism and MCC on the diagnostic results should not be ignored.

First-trimester chorionic villus sampling: genetic analysis of 985 cases / 中华围产医学杂志

Objective To investigate the value and safety of first-trimester chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in prenatal diagnosis.Methods This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 985 cases undergoing CVS and prenatal diagnosis with karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Peking University First Hospital from January 2012 to December 2017.The success rate of cell culture,indications for prenatal diagnosis,karyotyping results,and complications of CVS were described.Results Among the 985 cases,970 (98.48％) underwent FISH and 893 (90.66％) received karyotyping,and 878 (89.14％) accepted both.After CVS,the success rate of cell culture was 96.64％ (863/893).Abnormal ultrasonographic findings (42.64％,420/985) were the most common indications for prenatal diagnosis.In this study,181 cases of chromosomal abnormalities were detected,including numerical and structural abnormalities,accounting for 18.38％ of all 985 cases.Those cases with abnormal ultrasonographic images had the highest detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities (31.90％,134/420),followed by those with adverse pregnant history (11.83％,20/169) and advanced maternal age (8.21％,11/134).In addition,there was a discrepancy between karyotyping and FISH results,which might due to 16 cases of placental mosaicism and 13 cases of maternal cell contamination (MCC).Embryonic demises were reported in six cases (0.61％,6/985),including four with chromosomal numerical abnormalities within four weeks after CVS.No other short-or long-term postoperative complications were found in the rest 979 cases (99.39％).Conclusions CVS in the first trimester is a safe and reliable invasive method for prenatal diagnosis,which can help to obtain an earlier diagnosis in a certain population such as those with abnormal ultrasonographic findings,thus improve the pertinence and efficiency of prenatal diagnosis.However,the potential influences of placental mosaicism and MCC on the diagnostic results should not be ignored.

[Chorionic villus cell culture and karyotype analysis in 1 983 cases of spontaneous miscarriage].

Objective: To investigate the relationship between spontaneous miscarriage and embryonic chromosome abnormalities, and to evaluate the clinical application of karyotype analysis by chorionic villus cell culture. Methods: The chorionic villus karyotype of 1 983 cases of miscarriage from January 2010 to July 2016 in Guangzhou Women and Children's Mecical Center were analyzed retrospectively. The miscarried chorionic villi were obtained by curettage under sterilized condition. The chromosome specimens were prepared after chorionic villus cell culture. Karyotype analysis was performed by G-banding technique. Results: In the 1 983 samples, successful karyotype analysis was performed in 1 770 cases, with the successful rate of 89.98%. Chromosomal abnormalities were found in 1 038 cases (58.64%, 1 038/1 770). Chromosomal structural abnormalities were found in 37 cases. The numeral abnormalities were more common than structural abnormalities, and most of the numeral abnormalities were aneupoidies. In turn, they were trisomy 16, 45,X, trisomy 22, trisomy 2, trisomy 21, trisomy 15. The most common structural abnormality was balanced translocation, including Robersonian translocation. Female embryoes accounted for 61.02% (1 080/1 770) miscarriages and for 57.4%(596/1 770) of chromosomal abnormalities, while male embroyes acoounted for 61.02% (1 080/1 770) , 57.4% (596/1 770) respectively. The proportion of female embryoes was higher than male embryoes. The median age of the patients was 30 years old (16-46 years old) . As the maternal age increased, the proportion chromosomal abnormalities increased. The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in the advanced age group (≥35 years) was 68.38% (240/351) , which was significantly higher than that in the younger group (56.24%, 798/1 419; χ(2)=17.10, P<0.01). Conclusions: Embryonic chromosomal abnormalities are the most common cause of early spontaneous miscarriage. The abnormalities centralize in some karyotypes. There is certain relationship between maternal age and the incidence of miscarriage, as well as the embryonic gender. Chorionic villus cell culture and karyotype analysis are helpful in finding the cause of miscarriage and counsel the patients.

Overview of Chromosome Abnormalities in First Trimester Miscarriages: A Series of 1,011 Consecutive Chorionic Villi Sample Karyotypes.

In order to contribute to the knowledge of type and frequency of chromosome abnormalities in early pregnancy losses, we analyzed the cytogenetic results from a large series of first trimester miscarriages, using a diagnostic approach with a high success rate and no maternal contamination. A total of 1,119 consecutive chorionic villi samples were obtained before evacuation, and karyotypes were prepared after short-term culture (STC). In 603 samples, a long-term culture (LTC) was also performed. The overall and individual frequencies of the different types of chromosome abnormalities were established, including placental mosaicisms, and their relationship with maternal age and gestational weeks was assessed. An abnormal karyotype was detected in 70.3% of the samples. Single autosomal trisomy was the most frequent abnormality (64.6% of the abnormal cases), followed by triploidy (13.1%) and monosomy X (10.4%). Chromosome rearrangements were found in 5.2%, combined abnormalities in 8.9%, and placental mosaicism in 3.5% of the cases with STC and LTC performed. Individual trisomies behaved differently with respect to maternal age and intrauterine survival. Due to the combination of STC and LTC, our study offers reliable information on the incidence and type of chromosome abnormalities and placental mosaicism in miscarriages and contributes to define the cytogenetic implication in their etiology.

Chorionic villus cell culture and karyotype analysis in 1983 cases of spontaneous miscarriage / 中华妇产科杂志

Objective To investigate the relationship between spontaneous miscarriage and embryonic chromosome abnormalities,and to evaluate the clinical application of karyotype analysis by chorionic villus cell culture. Methods The chorionic villus karyotype of 1983 cases of miscarriage from January 2010 to July 2016 in Guangzhou Women and Children′ s Mecical Center were analyzed retrospectively. The miscarried chorionic villi were obtained by curettage under sterilized condition. The chromosome specimens were prepared after chorionic villus cell culture. Karyotype analysis was performed by G-banding technique. Results In the 1983 samples, successful karyotype analysis was performed in 1770 cases, with the successful rate of 89.98%. Chromosomal abnormalities were found in 1038 cases (58.64%,1038/1770). Chromosomal structural abnormalities were found in 37 cases. The numeral abnormalities were more common than structural abnormalities, and most of the numeral abnormalities were aneupoidies. In turn, they were trisomy 16, 45,X, trisomy 22, trisomy 2, trisomy 21, trisomy 15. The most common structural abnormality was balanced translocation, including Robersonian translocation. Female embryoes accounted for 61.02%(1080/1770) miscarriages and for 57.4%(596/1770) of chromosomal abnormalities, while male embroyes acoounted for 61.02%(1080/1770),57.4%(596/1770)respectively. The proportion of female embryoes was higher than male embryoes. The median age of the patients was 30 years old(16-46 years old). As the maternal age increased, the proportion chromosomal abnormalities increased. The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in the advanced age group (≥35 years) was 68.38%(240/351), which was significantly higher than that in the younger group (56.24% ,798/1419; χ2=17.10, P<0.01). Conclusions Embryonic chromosomal abnormalities are the most common cause of early spontaneous miscarriage. The abnormalities centralize in some karyotypes. There is certain relationship between maternal age and the incidence of miscarriage, as well as the embryonic gender. Chorionic villus cell culture and karyotype analysis are helpful in finding the cause of miscarriage and counsel the patients.

Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction for rapid prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies in chorionic villus sampling in a single institution.

OBJECTIVE: To validate quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) via chorionic villus sampling (CVS) for the diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive pregnant women who had undergone CVS at Cheil General Hospital between December 2009 and June 2014. Only cases with reported QF-PCR before long-term culture (LTC) for conventional cytogenetic analysis were included, and the results of these two methods were compared. RESULTS: A total of 383 pregnant women underwent QF-PCR and LTC via CVS during the study period and 403 CVS specimens were collected. The indications of CVS were as follows: abnormal first-trimester ultrasonographic findings, including increased fetal nuchal translucency (85.1%), advanced maternal age (6.8%), previous history of fetal anomalies (4.2%), and positive dual test results for trisomy 21 (3.9%). The results of QF-PCR via CVS were as follows: 76 (18.9%) cases were identified as trisomy 21 (36 cases), 18 (33 cases), or 13 (seven cases), and 4 (1.0%) cases were suspected to be mosaicism. All results of common autosomal trisomies by QF-PCR were consistent with those of LTC and there were no false-positive findings. Four cases suspected as mosaicism in QF-PCR were confirmed as non-mosaic trisomies of trisomy 21 (one case) or trisomy 18 (three cases) in LTC. CONCLUSION: QF-PCR via CVS has the advantage of rapid prenatal screening at an earlier stage of pregnancy for common chromosomal trisomies and thus can reduce the anxiety of parents. In particular, it can be helpful for pregnant women with increased fetal nuchal translucency or abnormal first-trimester ultrasonographic findings.

Genetic Counseling for Patients Considering Screening and Diagnosis for Chromosomal Abnormalities.

With the introduction of cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy and chromosomal microarray for prenatal diagnostic testing, options for pregnant women have become increasingly complex. Discussions regarding options for prenatal testing for aneuploidy should occur prior to any testing and should include pertinent risks and benefits of each alternative test. There is no single screening or diagnostic test option that is the right choice for all patients; patient decisions should be based on each individual woman's values and preferences after a discussion of all options.

Interventions et techniques de diagnostic prénatal visant l'obtention d'un prélèvement fœtal à des fins diagnostiques : Risques et avantages pour la mère et le fœtus.

OBJECTIF: Offrir aux fournisseurs de soins de maternité et à leurs patientes des lignes directrices factuelles contemporaines en ce qui concerne les services de counseling traitant des risques et des avantages maternels propres à la tenue des interventions diagnostiques prénatales orientées par échographie (et/ou des techniques permettant l'établissement d'un diagnostic génétique) nécessaires dans les cas où il a été établi pendant la période prénatale que la grossesse serait exposée à des risques, ainsi qu'en ce qui concerne la prise de décisions subséquentes quant à la prise en charge de la grossesse (questions abordant des aspects tels que le niveau du fournisseur de soins obstétricaux, la surveillance prénatale, le lieu où devraient se dérouler les soins et l'accouchement, et la décision de poursuivre ou d'interrompre la grossesse). La présente directive clinique se limite aux services de counseling traitant des risques et des avantages maternels, et aux décisions en matière de prise en charge de la grossesse pour les femmes qui nécessitent (ou qui envisagent) la mise en œuvre d'une intervention ou d'une technique effractive orientée par échographie aux fins de l'établissement d'un diagnostic prénatal. POPULATION DE PATIENTES: Femmes enceintes identifiées, à la suite de la mise en œuvre de protocoles établis de dépistage prénatal (taux sériques maternels ± imagerie, résultats d'analyse de l'ADN acellulaire indiquant des risques élevés, résultats anormaux au moment de l'imagerie fœtale diagnostique ou antécédents familiaux de troubles héréditaires), comme étant exposées à un risque accru d'anomalie génétique fœtale. Ces femmes pourraient nécessiter ou demander des services de counseling au sujet des risques et des avantages pour la grossesse de la tenue d'une intervention effractive orientée par échographie visant à déterminer l'étiologie, le diagnostic, et/ou la pathologie de possibles anomalies fœtales. RéSULTATS: La littérature publiée a été récupérée par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans Medline, PubMed et The Cochrane Library jusqu'en juin 2014 au moyen d'un vocabulaire contrôlé (« prenatal diagnosis ¼, « amniocentesis ¼, « chorionic villi sampling ¼, « cordocentesis ¼) et de mots clés (« prenatal screening ¼, « prenatal genetic counselling ¼, « post-procedural pregnancy loss rate ¼) appropriés. Les résultats ont été restreints aux analyses systématiques, aux études observationnelles et aux essais comparatifs randomisés / essais cliniques comparatifs publiés en anglais entre janvier 1985 et juin 2014. Les recherches ont été mises à jour de façon régulière et intégrées à la directive clinique jusqu'en juin 2014. La littérature grise (non publiée) a été identifiée par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans les sites Web d'organismes s'intéressant à l'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, dans des registres d'essais cliniques et auprès de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales. VALEURS: La qualité des résultats a été évaluée au moyen des critères décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs (Tableau 1). AVANTAGES, DéSAVANTAGES ET COûTS: Consentement éclairé de la patiente, transfert des connaissances, évaluation du risque génétique prénatal, soulagement de l'anxiété, création d'anxiété, défense des droits, compréhension du dépistage fœtal, limites du dépistage fœtal, choix en matière de prise en charge de la grossesse, complication de la grossesse ou fausse couche, soins opportuns et améliorés pour l'accouchement d'un enfant présentant une morbidité reconnue. RECOMMANDATIONS.

Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction for rapid prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies in chorionic villus sampling in a single institution

OBJECTIVE: To validate quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) via chorionic villus sampling (CVS) for the diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive pregnant women who had undergone CVS at Cheil General Hospital between December 2009 and June 2014. Only cases with reported QF-PCR before long-term culture (LTC) for conventional cytogenetic analysis were included, and the results of these two methods were compared. RESULTS: A total of 383 pregnant women underwent QF-PCR and LTC via CVS during the study period and 403 CVS specimens were collected. The indications of CVS were as follows: abnormal first-trimester ultrasonographic findings, including increased fetal nuchal translucency (85.1%), advanced maternal age (6.8%), previous history of fetal anomalies (4.2%), and positive dual test results for trisomy 21 (3.9%). The results of QF-PCR via CVS were as follows: 76 (18.9%) cases were identified as trisomy 21 (36 cases), 18 (33 cases), or 13 (seven cases), and 4 (1.0%) cases were suspected to be mosaicism. All results of common autosomal trisomies by QF-PCR were consistent with those of LTC and there were no false-positive findings. Four cases suspected as mosaicism in QF-PCR were confirmed as non-mosaic trisomies of trisomy 21 (one case) or trisomy 18 (three cases) in LTC. CONCLUSION: QF-PCR via CVS has the advantage of rapid prenatal screening at an earlier stage of pregnancy for common chromosomal trisomies and thus can reduce the anxiety of parents. In particular, it can be helpful for pregnant women with increased fetal nuchal translucency or abnormal first-trimester ultrasonographic findings.

Prenatal Diagnosis Procedures and Techniques to Obtain a Diagnostic Fetal Specimen or Tissue: Maternal and Fetal Risks and Benefits.

OBJECTIVE: To provide maternity care providers and their patients with current evidence-based guidelines for maternal risk/benefit counselling for a prenatally identified at-risk pregnancy that requires ultrasound-guided prenatal diagnostic procedures and/or techniques for a genetic diagnosis and for subsequent pregnancy management decisions on questions such as level of obstetrical care provider, antenatal surveillance, location of care and delivery, and continuation or termination of pregnancy. This guideline is limited to maternal risk/benefit counselling and pregnancy management decisions for women who require, or are considering, an invasive ultrasound-guided procedure or technique for prenatal diagnosis. PATIENT POPULATION: Pregnant women identified as having an increased risk of a fetal genetic abnormality secondary to the process of established prenatal screening protocols (maternal serum±imaging, high-risk cell-free DNA results, abnormal diagnostic fetal imaging, or a positive family history of an inherited condition). These women may require or request counselling about pregnancy risks and benefits of an invasive ultrasound-guided procedure to determine the etiology, diagnosis, and/or pathology for the possible fetal anomaly or anomalies. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library in and prior to June 2014 using an appropriate controlled vocabulary (prenatal diagnosis, amniocentesis, chorionic villi sampling, cordocentesis) and key words (prenatal screening, prenatal genetic counselling, post-procedural pregnancy loss rate). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies written in English and published from January 1985 to June 2014. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to June 2014. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical speciality societies. VALUES: The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). Health benefits, side effects, and risks: Patient informed consent, knowledge translation, genetic prenatal risk assessment, anxiety relief, anxiety creation, advocacy, understanding or limitation for fetal testing, pregnancy management choice, pregnancy complication or loss, timely and improved care for birth of a neonate with recognized morbidity. Recommendations 1. The health care provider should counsel the at-risk pregnant woman on the different levels of genetic fetal testing in order for her to have a clear understanding and expectation of the level of testing and type of results that are offered. (III-B) 2. As part of the informed consent process, the health care provider should review with the at-risk pregnant woman the risks and benefits of in utero genetic diagnostic techniques associated with fetal genetic testing options. (III-A) 3. During risk/benefit counselling, the health care provider should advise that the best estimate of the pregnancy loss rate related to: a.amniocentesis is 0.5% to 1.0% (range 0.17 to 1.53%) (I) b.chorionic villus sampling is 0.5% to 1.0% (I) and c.cordocentesis or percutaneous umbilical blood sampling is 1.3% for fetuses with no anomalies and 1.3% to 25% for fetuses with single or multiple anomalies or intrauterine growth restriction. (II-2A).

Objectif : Offrir aux fournisseurs de soins de maternité et à leurs patientes des lignes directrices factuelles contemporaines en ce qui concerne les services de counseling traitant des risques et des avantages maternels propres à la tenue des interventions diagnostiques prénatales orientées par échographie (et/ou des techniques permettant l'établissement d'un diagnostic génétique) nécessaires dans les cas où il a été établi pendant la période prénatale que la grossesse serait exposée à des risques, ainsi qu'en ce qui concerne la prise de décisions subséquentes quant à la prise en charge de la grossesse (questions abordant des aspects tels que le niveau du fournisseur de soins obstétricaux, la surveillance prénatale, le lieu où devraient se dérouler les soins et l'accouchement, et la décision de poursuivre ou d'interrompre la grossesse). La présente directive clinique se limite aux services de counseling traitant des risques et des avantages maternels, et aux décisions en matière de prise en charge de la grossesse pour les femmes qui nécessitent (ou qui envisagent) la mise en œuvre d'une intervention ou d'une technique effractive orientée par échographie aux fins de l'établissement d'un diagnostic prénatal. Population de patientes : Femmes enceintes identifiées, à la suite de la mise en œuvre de protocoles établis de dépistage prénatal (taux sériques maternels ± imagerie, résultats d'analyse de l'ADN acellulaire indiquant des risques élevés, résultats anormaux au moment de l'imagerie fœtale diagnostique ou antécédents familiaux de troubles héréditaires), comme étant exposées à un risque accru d'anomalie génétique fœtale. Ces femmes pourraient nécessiter ou demander des services de counseling au sujet des risques et des avantages pour la grossesse de la tenue d'une intervention effractive orientée par échographie visant à déterminer l'étiologie, le diagnostic, et/ou la pathologie de possibles anomalies fœtales. Résultats : La littérature publiée a été récupérée par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans Medline, PubMed et The Cochrane Library jusqu'en juin 2014 au moyen d'un vocabulaire contrôlé (« prenatal diagnosis ¼, « amniocentesis ¼, « chorionic villi sampling ¼, « cordocentesis ¼) et de mots clés (« prenatal screening ¼, « prenatal genetic counselling ¼, « post-procedural pregnancy loss rate ¼) appropriés. Les résultats ont été restreints aux analyses systématiques, aux études observationnelles et aux essais comparatifs randomisés / essais cliniques comparatifs publiés en anglais entre janvier 1985 et juin 2014. Les recherches ont été mises à jour de façon régulière et intégrées à la directive clinique jusqu'en juin 2014. La littérature grise (non publiée) a été identifiée par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans les sites Web d'organismes s'intéressant à l'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, dans des registres d'essais cliniques et auprès de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales. Valeurs : La qualité des résultats a été évaluée au moyen des critères décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs (Tableau). Avantages, désavantages et coûts : Consentement éclairé de la patiente, transfert des connaissances, évaluation du risque génétique prénatal, soulagement de l'anxiété, création d'anxiété, défense des droits, compréhension du dépistage fœtal, limites du dépistage fœtal, choix en matière de prise en charge de la grossesse, complication de la grossesse ou fausse couche, soins opportuns et améliorés pour l'accouchement d'un enfant présentant une morbidité reconnue. Recommandations 1. Les fournisseurs de soins de santé devraient offrir, aux femmes enceintes exposées à des risques, des services de counseling au sujet des différents niveaux du dépistage génétique fœtal, de façon à ce qu'elles puissent bien comprendre le niveau du dépistage qui leur est offert et les types de résultats auxquels elles sont en droit de s'attendre. (III-B) 2. Les fournisseurs de soins de santé devraient offrir, aux femmes enceintes exposées à des risques, des services de counseling au sujet de la ou des techniques de diagnostic génétique in utero qui sont associées aux options de dépistage génétique fœtal et en passer en revue les risques et les avantages dans le cadre du processus de consentement éclairé. (III-A) 3. Dans le cadre des services de counseling sur les risques et les avantages, les fournisseurs de soins de santé devraient aviser leurs patientes des meilleures estimations suivantes en ce qui concerne le taux de fausse couche : a. amniocentèse = 0,5%-1,0 % (plage : 0,17-1,53 %) (I) b. prélèvement de villosités choriales = 0,5 %-1,0 % (I) et c. cordocentèse (ou prélèvement percutané de sang ombilical) = 1,3 %, dans le cas des fœtus sans anomalies, et 1,3 %-25 %, dans le cas des fœtus présentant une ou des anomalies ou un retard de croissance intra-utérin. (II-2A).

Emerging issues in invasive prenatal diagnosis: Safety and competency in the post-NIPT era.

BACKGROUND: Numbers of invasive prenatal procedures are declining in response to improved aneuploidy screening methods. OBJECTIVE: To assess current practice and attitudes of clinicians performing invasive prenatal diagnosis in regard to patient consent and safety, maintaining procedural competence and uptake of chromosomal microarrays (CMAs). METHODS: Anonymous online survey of the Australian Association of Obstetrical and Gynaecological Ultrasonologists conducted in March 2015. RESULTS: The survey had a 45% response rate with 59 respondents from Australia. Of these, 34 were subspecialists in maternal fetal medicine or obstetric and gynaecological ultrasound. Fifty-six (95%) currently performed amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. Of these, 14 (25%) performed <25 procedures and 8 (14%) performed >150 annually, with most respondents (60%) proposing 10-25 amniocenteses/year as adequate activity to maintain their skills. The majority neither expected referrers to provide results of hepatitis B and HIV serology, nor followed up missing results. There was uncertainty regarding the procedure-related vertical transmission risk of HBV in women with high viral load, with most respondents stating they were either unsure of the risk (22%) or that the risk was unknown (30%). Fifty per cent of practitioners routinely ordered CMA after invasive testing; all recommended CMA following a diagnosis of structural abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: In a period of declining testing, many Australian specialists are performing <25 procedures annually. Consideration of the potential risks of bloodborne viruses is limited. CMAs are rapidly being incorporated into clinical practice. These data have implications for patient consent and safety, and workforce training and practice.

Prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders and role of multidisciplinary cooperative mode / 中华围产医学杂志

Objective To evaluate the trend in prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders (SGD) and role ofmultidisciplinary cooperative mode.Methods In January l,2012,amultidisciplinarycooperativemode for SGD diagnosis was established in the Peking University First Hospital,involving Departments of Obstetrics,Pediatrics,Neurology,Dermatology and Central Laboratory.For each pregnant woman with a family history of SGD for prenatal diagnosis,propositus should be diagnosed in the relevant departments,and then further diagnosed,managed and followed up by the Obstetrics Department.Up to December 31,2014,of 6 681 women for prenatal diagnosis,279 women had a family history of SGD:76 of them received chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at 11-14 gestational weeks,and 203 received amniocentesis (AC) at 16-22 gestational weeks.The trend in SGD diagnosis and the safety of CVS and AC were analyzed using Chi-square test.Results The proportion of SGD family history in AC group was 3.2％ (203/6 355),which stayed stable with 2.3％ (47/2 054) in 2012,3.9％ (78/2 023) in 2013 and 3.4％ (78/2 278) in 2014,and there was no significant difference between 2013 and 2014 (x2=0.571,P=0.463).In CVS group,the proportion of SGD family history was 23.3％ (76/326),showing an increasing trend with 18.2％ (8/44) in 2012,17.6％ (19/108) in 2013 and 28.2％ (49/174) in 2014,and there were significant differences between 2013 and 2014 (x2=4.067,P=0.046).The proportion of SGD family history in CVS group was higher than in AC group in year 2012,2013 and 2014 (x2＝42.626,44.531 and 201.400,all P=0.000).Among the 279 cases of SGD family history,no complications and adverse outcome were observed except an intra-uterine fetal death occurring 6 months after CVS in one woman,but 3 fetuses were found to have chromosome anomalies with one trisomy 18,one 45,X,and one mosaicism of 45,X/46,XY which was determined to be normal by AC.Conclusions SGD family history is one of the important indicators in prenatal diagnosis,and CVS is feasible for prenatal diagnosis of SGD family history as early as in the first trimester.Multidisciplinary cooperative mode is helpful in SGD family history diagnosis.

Analysis of increased nuchal translucency: Chorionic villi sampling and second-trimester level II sonography

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of increased fetal nuchal translucency (NT), to aid in prenatal counseling and management in our practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent first trimester fetal karyotyping using chorionic villi sampling (CVS) and second trimester level II sonography for a fetal NT thickness > or =3.0 mm between 11 weeks and 13 weeks 6 days' gestation, at Gyeongsang National University Hospital. Pediatric medical records and a telephone interview were used to follow-up live-born children. Exclusion criteria included incomplete data and CVS for other indications. RESULTS: Seventy cases met the inclusion criteria (median NT thickness, 4.7 mm; range, 3.0-16.1 mm). Twenty-nine cases (41.4%) were aneuploid. The prevalence of chromosomal defects increased with NT thickness: NT 3.0-3.4 mm, 16.7%; NT 3.5-4.4 mm, 27.3%; NT 4.5-5.4 mm, 66.7%; NT 5.5-6.4 mm, 37.5%; NT > or =6.5 mm, 62.5%. The most common karyotype abnormality was trisomy 18 (n=12), followed by trisomy 21 (n=9). In chromosomally normal fetuses (n=41), fetal death occurred in 2 cases (4.9%), and structural malformations were found in 11 cases (26.8%). In chromosomally and anatomically normal fetuses (n=28), one child had neurodevelopmental delay (3.6%). Twenty-eight infants who had a prenatal increased NT were alive and well at follow-up (40%). CONCLUSION: Outcomes of increased fetal NT might help inform prenatal counseling and management. The high prevalence of chromosomal defects associated with increased fetal NT implies that CVS should be performed in the first trimester, particularly considering the stress associated with an uncertain diagnosis.