Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 46
Filter
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(7)2024 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38610641

ABSTRACT

Background: Hand eczema (HE) is a prevalent chronic condition that exerts a substantial and enduring adverse effect on quality of life (QoL) and imposes an economic burden on society. Managing HE poses challenges due to the limited effectiveness and potential adverse effects associated with many currently available topical and systemic treatments. Methods: This article examines twenty-one patients affected by HE treated with dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin IL-4 and IL-13 signaling. This involves a retrospective descriptive statistical analysis. Results: At week 6, HECSI-75 was achieved by 12 patients (57.9%). The proportion of patients meeting the HECSI-75 criteria steadily increased over the observation weeks, reaching 90% at week 16 and 100% at week 104. Furthermore, HECSI-90 and HECSI-100 were achieved by 75% and 60% of patients at week 16 and by 100% and 85% of patients at week 68, respectively. All patients who reached week 104 maintained complete disease remission according to HECSI 100. Conclusions: In all patients, dupilumab was shown to be an effective drug in achieving disease clearance, as indicated by all the parameters considered at each evaluation point (Week 6, Week 16, Week 32, Week 52, Week 68, Week 84, and Week 104), in comparison to the initial baseline.

2.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(4): 110, 2024 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507100

ABSTRACT

The Investigator Global Assessment of Chronic Hand Eczema (IGA-CHE) is a novel Clinician-Reported Outcome measure that allows investigators to assess cross-sectional CHE global disease severity using clinical characteristics of erythema, scaling, lichenification/hyperkeratosis, vesiculation, oedema, and fissures as guidelines for overall severity assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the IGA-CHE for use as an outcome measure in CHE clinical trials and clinical practice. Psychometric analyses were performed using data from a sample of 280 patients with moderate to severe CHE from a phase 3 trial of delgocitinib cream, pooled across treatment groups. Test-retest reliability results were moderate to strong with kappa coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.76. Correlations with measures assessing related concepts were moderate or strong (range 0.65-0.72) and exceeded a priori hypotheses, providing evidence of convergent validity. Known-groups validity was supported by statistically significant differences between severity groups (< 0.001). Within-group effect sizes were consistently larger for improved groups compared to stable groups, providing evidence of ability to detect change. Anchor-based analyses generated within-subject meaningful change estimates ranging from - 0.8 to - 2.3. A correlation weighted average suggested a single value of - 1.7 in change from baseline. These findings provide evidence the IGA-CHE scale has strong reliability, construct validity, and ability to detect change, supporting its use as an endpoint in CHE clinical trials and clinical practice. Based on the evidence, 2-level changes in IGA-CHE score are considered a conservative meaningful change threshold; however, findings also indicate 1-level change in IGA-CHE scores reflects a clinically meaningful improvement for patients.Clinical trial registration: NCT04871711.


Subject(s)
Eczema , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Cross-Sectional Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Eczema/diagnosis , Eczema/drug therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Immunoglobulin A/therapeutic use
3.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) ; 14(3): 643-669, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485862

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chronic Hand Eczema (CHE) is an inflammatory skin disease of the hands. The Hand Eczema Symptom Diary (HESD) is a new patient-reported outcome measure of worst severity of core CHE signs/symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate content and psychometric validity of the HESD. METHODS: The HESD was developed based on the literature and concept elicitation interviews. Qualitative cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with CHE patients to assess relevance and understanding of items, response options and recall period. Psychometric properties of the HESD (item performance, dimensionality, reliability, validity, responsiveness and estimation of meaningful change thresholds) were then assessed, first using data from a phase 2b trial (NCT03683719), and confirmed using data from the first 280 participants completing the 16-week treatment phase of a phase 3 trial (NCT04871711). RESULTS: Cognitive debriefing supported item refinement and removal of items and confirmed all items were well understood and relevant to patients. Item properties and dimensionality analyses in the phase 2b data supported removal of additional items, resulting in the 6-item HESD included in the phase 3 trial. Unidimensionality was supported by inter-item correlations (all > 0.70) and Rasch analysis. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.89) results were very strong. Construct validity was supported by moderate correlations with concurrent measures (0.53-0.64) and significant differences between severity groups (p < 0.001). Large effect sizes for mean change scores in participants that improved and significant differences between change groups indicated the ability to detect change. Anchor-based analyses supported within-individual responder definitions of ≥ 4-points for improvements in 7-day average HESD scores. CONCLUSION: The HESD is the first CHE-specific, patient-reported outcome measure of CHE signs/symptoms developed and validated in line with regulatory guidance. This article provides evidence of strong content validity and psychometric validity and shows improvements of ≥ 4 points on 7-day average HESD scores represent clinically meaningful, important changes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03683719, NCT04871711.

4.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(4): 365-371, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38164049

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic Hand Eczema (CHE) is a heterogeneous fluctuating inflammatory disease that represents a significant burden. Effective treatment options for moderate to severe CHE are limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess how patients with moderate to severe CHE are treated in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective, physician-led patient record review assessed the demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics of patients aged ≥18 years with CHE across seven countries. Each participating physician was requested to review records for their three most recent patients with moderate to severe CHE treated with a topical or systemic therapy. RESULTS: A total of 264 physicians, of whom 88.6% were dermatologists and 70.1% were predominantly or partly hospital-based, reviewed the records of 792 patients. Signs were present on hands only in 56.4% of patients and the mean time on current treatment was 16.7 months. Overall, 62.9% of patients received systemic therapy and almost one-quarter (23.4%) were treated with a biologic; 28.6% of patients were only treated with topical corticosteroids and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors. CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate to severe CHE, most received systemic therapy with one-quarter on biologic therapy. However, given that many of these treatments have limited evidence of efficacy in CHE, there is a need for studies specifically in patients with CHE as well as new therapeutic options.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatologic Agents , Eczema , Hand Dermatoses , Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Chronic Disease , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Eczema/drug therapy , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Hand Dermatoses/drug therapy
5.
JAAD Int ; 14: 77-83, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38274394

ABSTRACT

Background: Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are used to treat most patients with chronic hand eczema (CHE), but knowledge about TCS-related adverse events in CHE is limited. Objectives: To investigate patient-reported adverse events to TCS in CHE patients. Methods: Data on adverse events related to TCS use in patients with CHE were analyzed from the Danish Skin Cohort; a prospective survey of a hospital cohort. We assessed patients' knowledge about TCS use and adverse event risks, and preference of TCS versus a nonsteroidal topical alternative. Results: Of 724 adults with CHE (64.0% women; mean age 57.5 [standard deviation 12.8] years), 64.1% reported skin atrophy, 41.4% cracks/fissures, 23.9% bleeding, 45.9% pain/stinging sensation, 40.0% reduced hand dexterity, and 40.2% worsening of CHE signs or symptoms from using TCS. We observed CHE-severity-dependent associations (all groups; P < .0001). Most patients (76.4%) would prefer a nonsteroidal option, 10.9% were neutral/indifferent, and 12.7% would prefer TCS for CHE. The median numerical rating scale-score (ranging from 0 to 10) was 10 (interquartile range 6-10) for preferring a nonsteroidal topical treatment. Limitations: Differences across TCS formulations were unexplored. Conclusion: TCS-related cutaneous adverse events were common. There is a desire from patients for novel steroid-free topical alternatives for CHE treatment.

6.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(2): 161-168, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37960922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Overall adherence in the treatment of chronic dermatoses is poor. Textbooks state an adherence dependence on galenics. TRIAL DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, parallel-grouped, single-blinded (investigator), monocentric clinical trial (phase IV) on the adherence to treatment of chronic mild to moderate hand eczema with topical methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA, Advantan®) in different vehicles. OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS: Primary objective was the assessment of the adherence depending on vehicle type in patients with chronic hand eczema. Secondary objective was improvement after a 4-week treatment period. Primary Endpoint Adherence is defined as the percentage of patients applying at least aimed daily dose. Prescribed daily dose was defined as the planned number of applications per day (1) * surface (measured) * aimed amount per application (mg/cm2 ). Truly applicated daily dose was evaluated as individual mean amount per dose * individual mean number of applications per day. Adherence was assumed, if truly applicated daily dose is at least 75% of the prescribed daily dose and the individual mean number of applications per day is at least 0.85. Secondary Endpoint Efficacy was measured by improvement of Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) after a 4-week treatment period and in addition to Quality of Life in Hand Eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess pruritus. METHODS: Number of participants randomized to each group 40, 80 total. Group 1 MPA-C: Methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream and barrier repair emollient (Bepanthen® Sensiderm). Group 2 MPA-FO: Methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% fatty ointment and barrier repair emollient (Bepanthen® Sensiderm). Adherence to treatment was compared via Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the patients, 48% were adherent according to our definition. There was no significant difference between MPA-C (42.1%) and MPA-FO (54.1%; p = 0.36; group difference-12.0%, 95% CI-34.3%-11.5%). Generalized-linear-model-analysis of adherence to study treatment with factors emollient use, treatment, time and treatment-time interaction showed a parallel between adherence and amount of emollient use (odds ratio 1.74, p = 0.0038; 95% CI-1.22-2.52). Improvement of hand eczema was seen according to clinical scores without remarkable differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: No dependence of adherence on galenics of topical treatment of chronic hand eczema could be proved. Patients who use more emollient tend to be more adherent to the topical treatment.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Eczema , Pantothenic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Emollients/therapeutic use , Ointments , Quality of Life , Prospective Studies , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/drug therapy , Methylprednisolone , Eczema/drug therapy , Eczema/chemically induced , Treatment Outcome
7.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(2): 153-160, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37828631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Topical corticosteroids under occlusion have been used to enhance the treatment of eczema. However, no study has investigated the efficacy of a steroid-containing transdermal patch for the treatment of chronic hand eczema. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial to determine the efficacy of a transdermal patch containing betamethasone dipropionate compared to topical betamethasone dipropionate ointment in the treatment of mild to moderate chronic hand eczema. The patients were included and assigned to receive either the transdermal patch once daily at night or the ointment twice daily for a period of 8 weeks. The outcomes were assessed using the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI), Physical Global Assessment (PGA) score, self-reported compliance, level of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and side effects. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients completed this study. At 8 weeks, there was a significant reduction in the HECSI scores in both the transdermal patch and topical ointment groups compared to those measured at baseline (14.61 to 1.86, p < 0.001; 18.46 to 3.43, p < 0.001, respectively) without a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Similarly, the two groups did not show any significant difference in the PGA scores, quality of life and side effects. However, the transdermal patch group reported better compliance and a higher level of patient satisfaction than the topical ointment group. CONCLUSION: The transdermal corticosteroid patch has proven to be a safe and effective treatment, comparable to topical corticosteroids, after 8 weeks of use. Its sustained-release properties, along with once-daily use, can improve patient satisfaction and promote greater adherence to the treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (www. CLINICALTRIALS: in.th) under registration number TCTR20220413003.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatologic Agents , Eczema , Humans , Ointments , Quality of Life , Hydrogels , Single-Blind Method , Transdermal Patch , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/drug therapy , Betamethasone/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Eczema/drug therapy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects
8.
Explore (NY) ; 2023 Oct 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37872023

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a common skin inflammation with a complex pathophysiology. Due to its anti-inflammatory properties, Portulaca oleracea L. (purslane) is traditionally used in Persian medicine for skin ailments. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a standardized purslane extract (based on traditional Persian medicine) for adults with mild or moderately severe CHE. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted at Razi Hospital in Iran from January to June 2022. Participants were randomly allocated to receive an oral purslane or placebo syrup plus topical Vaseline for four weeks. Seventy participants were randomly allocated into the intervention (n = 35) and placebo (n = 35) groups. The primary outcomes were the extent and severity of CHE symptoms over the four weeks after adjusting for age, gender and baseline score. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, symptom recurrence, treatment satisfaction, and adverse events. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment, compared to the placebo group (n = 31), the purslane group (n = 31) had significantly lower physician-reported fissure scores (adjusted mean difference (adjMD): -0.50, 95 %CI -3.93 to -0.34, p = 0.043), participant-reported itching (adjMD -0.51, 95 %CI -2.32 to -0.31, p = 0.041), dryness (adjMD -1.46, 95 %CI -2.89 to -0.03, p = 0.045), and total itching, dryness and thickness (adjMD -2.36, 95 %CI -6.23 to -1.51, p = 0.023) scores. Fourteen participants (purslane n = 10; placebo n = 4, p = 0.068) experienced adverse events of mild to moderate severity. CONCLUSION: Purslane has some promising effects for reducing the extent and severity of CHE symptoms, and no direct comparisons have been made with commonly used treatments. Future multicenter trials and mechanistic studies are warranted to establish the safety and effectiveness of purslane as a potential therapeutic agent for CHE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200707048040N1).

9.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(11)2023 Jun 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37298605

ABSTRACT

Retinoids are a frequently used class of drugs in the treatment of inflammatory as well as malignant skin diseases. Retinoids have differential affinity for the retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and/or the retinoid X receptor (RXR). The endogenous dual RAR and RXR agonist alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid) demonstrated remarkable efficacy in the treatment of chronic hand eczema (CHE) patients; however, detailed information on the mechanisms of action remains elusive. Here, we used CHE as a model disease to unravel immunomodulatory pathways following retinoid receptor signaling. Transcriptome analyses of skin specimens from alitretinoin-responder CHE patients identified 231 significantly regulated genes. Bioinformatic analyses indicated keratinocytes as well as antigen presenting cells as cellular targets of alitretinoin. In keratinocytes, alitretinoin interfered with inflammation-associated barrier gene dysregulation as well as antimicrobial peptide induction while markedly inducing hyaluronan synthases without affecting hyaluronidase expression. In monocyte-derived dendritic cells, alitretinoin induced distinct morphological and phenotypic characteristics with low co-stimulatory molecule expression (CD80 and CD86), the increased secretion of IL-10 and the upregulation of the ecto-5'-nucleotidase CD73 mimicking immunomodulatory or tolerogenic dendritic cells. Indeed, alitretinoin-treated dendritic cells demonstrated a significantly reduced capacity to activate T cells in mixed leukocyte reactions. In a direct comparison, alitretinoin-mediated effects were significantly stronger than those observed for the RAR agonist acitretin. Moreover, longitudinal monitoring of alitretinoin-responder CHE patients could confirm in vitro findings. Taken together, we demonstrate that the dual RAR and RXR agonist alitretinoin targets epidermal dysregulation and demonstrates strong immunomodulatory effects on antigen presenting cell functions.


Subject(s)
Retinoids , Tretinoin , Humans , Alitretinoin , Retinoids/pharmacology , Tretinoin/pharmacology , Receptors, Retinoic Acid/metabolism , Retinoid X Receptors , Antigen-Presenting Cells/metabolism
10.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) ; 13(8): 1789-1799, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37354295

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of fractional CO2 laser combined with halometasone cream in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic hand eczema (CHE). METHODS: A prospective, single-center, parallel-group, open-label randomized trial including 67 patients with moderate-to-severe CHE was carried out. Patients were randomly assigned to group A (n = 33, fractional CO2 laser once every 4 weeks 1-2 times and halometasone cream twice daily for 8 weeks) or group B (n = 34, halometasone cream alone twice daily for 8 weeks). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving treatment success at week 12 in each group. Secondary endpoints included differences between groups in the change of hand eczema severity index (HECSI), patient global assessment (PaGA), dermatology life quality index (DLQI), and quality of life in hand eczema questionnaire (QOLHEQ) from baseline to week 12. Relapse rate and adverse effects were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients in each group completed the trial. At week 12, the treatment success rate was 62.1% (18/29) in group A and 27.6% (8/29) in group B (p = 0.009). At week 12, HECSI, PaGA, DLQI, and QOLHEQ all decreased compared with baseline in both groups (p < 0.05). HECSI, DLQI, and QOLHEQ decreased more in group A than group B (p = 0.014, 0.010, and 0.014, respectively), but there was no significant difference in change of PaGA between the two groups (1.0 versus 3.0, p = 0.419). Among patients achieving treatment success, 11.1% (2/18) patients in group A and 50.0% (4/8) patients in group B relapsed at week 24 (p = 0.011). Skin pigmentation was the most common adverse effect. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with moderate-to-severe CHE, fractional CO2 laser combined with halometasone cream is more effective than halometasone cream alone, with few adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100051948.

11.
Contact Dermatitis ; 89(1): 46-53, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37037780

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Measuring patient-reported outcomes is crucial to fully capture the burden of chronic hand eczema (CHE). OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of delgocitinib cream on itch, pain and nine additional key signs and symptoms reported by patients with CHE using the Hand Eczema Symptom Diary (HESD). METHODS: In a double-blind, phase IIb dose-ranging trial (NCT03683719), 258 adults with mild to severe CHE were randomized to delgocitinib cream 1, 3, 8 or 20 mg/g or cream vehicle twice daily for 16 weeks. Patients assessed 11 signs and symptoms of CHE daily through the HESD using an 11-point numeric rating scale; this was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: Delgocitinib cream 20 mg/g was associated with an early and sustained reduction in itch and pain, along with clinically relevant reductions of ≥4 points from baseline to Week 16 in 48.4% and 63.6% of patients, respectively (17.9% and 5.9% with cream vehicle). There were improvements versus cream vehicle in all assessed CHE signs and symptoms (20 mg/g, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Delgocitinib cream reduced itch, pain and other signs and symptoms in patients with CHE. This data correlated with clinician-reported outcomes, indicating that the HESD may be a useful assessment tool for CHE management.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Eczema , Adult , Humans , Eczema/drug therapy , Pruritus/drug therapy , Emollients/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Pain , Treatment Outcome
12.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 89(2): 235-242, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37094653

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gusacitinib is an oral inhibitor of Janus and Spleen tyrosine kinases. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of gusacitinib were evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 2 study in 97 chronic hand eczema patients randomized (1:1:1) to placebo or gusacitinib (40 or 80 mg) for 12 weeks (part A). Then, in part B (through week 32), the patients received gusacitinib. RESULTS: At week 16, patients receiving 80 mg gusacitinib showed a 69.5% (P <.005) decrease in the modified total lesion-symptom score versus 49.0% for 40 mg (P =.132), and 33.5% for placebo. Considerable improvement in Physician's Global Assessment was seen in 31.3% of patients receiving 80 mg versus 6.3% of placebo (P <.05). A 73.3% decrease in the hand eczema severity index versus placebo (21.7%) occurred in patients receiving 80 mg (P <.001). Patients receiving 80 mg experienced a considerable decrease in hand pain (P <.05). As early as week 2, considerable reductions over placebo in modified total lesion-symptom score (P <.005), Physician's Global Assessment (P =.04), and hand eczema severity index (P <.01) were observed (80 mg gusacitinib). Adverse events included upper respiratory infection, headache, nausea, and nasopharyngitis. CONCLUSIONS: Gusacitinib showed rapid improvement in chronic hand eczema patients and was well tolerated, warranting further investigations.


Subject(s)
Eczema , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Humans , Syk Kinase/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Eczema/drug therapy , Eczema/chemically induced , Double-Blind Method , Severity of Illness Index
13.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(1)2023 Dec 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38203533

ABSTRACT

Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a common inflammatory skin condition that significantly impacts the quality of life. From work-related disabilities to social embarrassment, pain, and financial costs, the burden on society is substantial. Managing this condition presents challenges such as long-term treatment, poor patient compliance, therapy side effects, and economic feasibility. As a result, significant efforts have been made in this field in recent years. Specifically, the broader understanding of CHE pathogenesis has led to the development of new drugs, both topical and systemic. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the current available data on hand eczema pathophysiology and explore the resulting developments in drugs for its treatment. A comprehensive search on PubMed and the other main scientific databases was conducted using keywords related to CHE and its pathogenesis. The most relevant pathways targeted by therapies include the JAK-STAT cascade, IL-4, and IL-13 axis, phosphodiesterase 4 enzyme, and chemo-attractant cytokines. In the near future, physicians will have a plethora of therapeutic alternatives. Consequently, they should be well-trained not only in how to use these alternatives but also how to combine these treatments to address the ongoing challenges related to efficacy, tolerability, and safety.


Subject(s)
Eczema , Quality of Life , Humans , Eczema/drug therapy , Eczema/etiology , Skin , Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4 , Cytokines
14.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs ; 31(8): 843-853, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35658708

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a highly prevalent, burdensome condition associated with functional impairment. Currently, topical therapeutics are the mainstay of CHE management. However, many cases are refractory to existing topical therapeutics, and the few existing systemic options are often limited in efficacy and by their side effect profiles. AREAS COVERED: Following a brief overview of CHE pathogenesis and existing treatments, this review will outline the mechanisms and available data on emerging and investigational drugs currently being studied in clinical trials for the treatment of CHE. EXPERT OPINION: Immunomodulatory drugs such as topical and systemic JAK inhibitors and Th2-targeting antibodies such as dupilumab are currently under investigation for CHE treatment, with early promise. Management of CHE will likely move toward more targeted treatments through clinical trials and away from broad immunosuppressants such as cyclosporine and methotrexate, which have previously been investigated for CHE and have more side effects. In coming years, CHE patients may benefit from a wider range of both topical and systemic therapeutics that target immune pathways relevant to the various CHE subtypes.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents , Eczema , Hand Dermatoses , Chronic Disease , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Drugs, Investigational/adverse effects , Eczema/drug therapy , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/drug therapy , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects
15.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 23(2): 159-167, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34789049

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a frequent skin disorder affecting up to 10% of the population and strongly reduces Quality of Life (QoL). The first-line therapeutic strategies for the management of CHE include a change of lifestyle, an education program for the skin and the application of specific emollients. Topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors are the most used anti-inflammatory drugs. However, up to 65% of patients require systemic options. Alitretinoin, a retinoid structurally related to vitamin A, is the first systemic treatment approved in the European Union (EU) for severe CHE refractory to potent topical corticosteroids. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the available data on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety profile of oral alitretinoin for the treatment of CHE. EXPERT OPINION: Alitretinoin can be considered as a valid therapeutic option for the treatment of CHE in patients not responding to ordinary treatments. Clinical trials and real-life experiences showed that it acts effectively on both objective and subjective clinical signs, resulting in a significant improvement in QoL of patients. As for other retinoids, caution should be taken in patients with certain chronic diseases (hepatopathies, kidney failure, hyperlipidemia, thyroid dysfunction) or childbearing potential women.


Subject(s)
Eczema , Hand Dermatoses , Alitretinoin , Eczema/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Quality of Life , Tretinoin/therapeutic use
16.
Ann Dermatol ; 33(4): 351-360, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34341637

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema refers to eczema located on the hands, regardless of its etiology or morphology. Despite its high prevalence and significant impact on patients' quality of life, treatment is frequently challenging because of its heterogeneity, chronic and recurrent course, and lack of well-organized randomized controlled trials of the various treatment options. OBJECTIVE: These consensus guidelines aim to provide evidence-based recommendations on the diagnosis and management of hand eczema to improve patient care by helping physicians make more efficient and transparent decisions. METHODS: A modified Delphi method, comprising two rounds of email questionnaires with face-to-face meetings in between, was adopted for the consensus process that took place between February and September 2020. Forty experts in the field of skin allergy and contact dermatitis were invited to participate in the expert panel. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for the domains of classification, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment; and a therapeutic ladder to manage chronic hand eczema was developed. CONCLUSION: These are the first consensus guidelines for chronic hand eczema in the Asian population, which will help standardize care and assist clinical decision-making in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic hand eczema.

17.
Dermatol Ther ; 34(3): e14911, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33619833

ABSTRACT

Alitretinoin is the only systemic agent approved to treat moderate-severe chronic hand eczema (CHE) unresponsive to potent topical corticosteroids. No nationwide Italian data regarding real-life efficacy, safety, and tolerability of treatment are available. The DECISA project (DErmatology Clinics in Italy: Survey on Alitretinoin) retrospectively examined data from a registry including 15 Dermatology Clinics authorized to prescription of alitretinoin for CHE patients. Disease severity was assessed at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months of treatment, using the 5-point Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and the modified Total Lesion-Symptoms-Severity (mTLSS) scores. Between November 2010 and July 2018, data of 248 male and 190 female patients (mean age 49.71 ± 13.20 years) treated with alitretinoin were collected. Of them, 43.2% had irritant contact dermatitis, 22.2% allergic contact dermatitis, 18.0% atopic dermatitis, 16.7% mixed (irritant/allergic) type of eczema. At 3 months, the 420 re-evaluated patients showed significantly reduced mTLSS and PGA (P < .0000001 vs baseline for both); PGA was clear/almost clear in 35.6% of cases. At 6 months, the 341 re-evaluated patients showed significant (P < .0000001) improvement of mTLSS and PGA vs baseline and 3 months (PGA clear/almost clear: 41.4%). Relapses occurred in 125 patients; 58 underwent an additional course of alitretinoin, with similarly good results. No relevant safety issues were reported; 86 patients experienced adverse effects, which forced 40 to prematurely stop treatment. The DECISA project results confirm the real-life efficacy, safety and tolerability of alitretinoin in the treatment of moderate to severe CHE refractory to standard topical therapies.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents , Dermatology , Eczema , Hand Dermatoses , Adult , Alitretinoin , Chronic Disease , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Eczema/diagnosis , Eczema/drug therapy , Female , Hand Dermatoses/diagnosis , Hand Dermatoses/drug therapy , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Tretinoin/adverse effects
18.
Dermatology ; 237(1): 31-38, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31982887

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Though topical corticosteroid is a standard treatment for chronic hand eczema (CHE), it can cause many adverse effects. Topical calcipotriol and monochromatic 308-nm excimer light (MEL) are new alternative therapies for several dermatoses, including CHE. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the efficacy of the combination of MEL and topical calcipotriol versus topical calcipotriol alone. METHODS: One hand of the participants was randomly assigned to be irradiated with MEL twice weekly and topical calcipotriol applied twice daily while the other hand was assigned to receive only topical calcipotriol twice daily for 8 weeks. Then, only petrolatum ointment was applied during the 4-week follow-up period. Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) and modified Total Lesion Symptom Score were assessed by a blinded investigator, and a visual analogue scale score of itching symptoms was graded by the participants. RESULTS: In total, 36 hands from 18 subjects completed the protocol. On the combination-treated sides, the mean HECSI score was significantly reduced by 25% (p = 0.015) from the 4th week. Then, it was gradually decreased to 57 and 65% (p < 0.001) at the 8th week and at the follow-up visit, respectively. For the monotherapy-treated sides, the mean HECSI score was reduced to 41% (p = 0.001) and 49% (p < 0.001) at the 8th and 12th week, accordingly. At the end of the treatment period, itching scores were significantly decreased by around 64% (p < 0.001) and 51% (p = 0.002) on the combination-treated and the monotherapy-treated sides. No serious and persistent adverse reactions were found. CONCLUSION: The combined MEL and topical calcipotriol may be considered as an alternatively effective treatment for CHE.


Subject(s)
Calcitriol/analogs & derivatives , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Eczema/therapy , Hand Dermatoses/therapy , Lasers, Excimer/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy , Administration, Topical , Adult , Aged , Calcitriol/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
19.
Eur J Dermatol ; 30(6): 710-715, 2020 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33155552

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis between palmar psoriasis (PP), chronic hand dermatitis (CHE), and hyperkeratotic hand dermatitis (HHD) is challenging. OBJECTIVES: We sought to distinguish the histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics between PP, CHD, and HHD. MATERIALS & METHODS: Hands, clinically diagnosed with PP, CHD, or HHD, were further evaluated using skin biopsy sections based on haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical analysis for ß-defensin 2 and interleukin-36γ. RESULTS: Confluent parakeratosis, absent granular layer, and psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia were more common in PP and HHD relative to CHE. The level of ß-defensin 2 expression in the stratum corneum and interleukin-36γ in the stratum granulosum was higher in PP and HHD relative to CHD. CONCLUSION: Considering the similarities of histopathological and immunohistochemical findings, HHD may be an inflammatory disorder with a pathogenesis similar to that of PP, rather than CHD.


Subject(s)
Eczema/pathology , Hand Dermatoses/pathology , Psoriasis/pathology , Chronic Disease , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Retrospective Studies
20.
Dermatol Ther ; 33(6): e14329, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975350

ABSTRACT

Photodynamic therapy (PDT), traditionally used in patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer, has been found to be effective for various inflammatory skin conditions. Daylight-activated PDT (DL-PDT), in which the sun serves as the light source, is substantially less painful than conventional PDT. This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of DL-PDT in a series of patients with chronic hand eczema (CHE). A proof-of-concept prospective design was used. Eight patients diagnosed with CHE at a tertiary dermatology clinic underwent DL-PDT. The first treatment was administered at the clinic and subsequent treatments (up to four total) were self-administered at home at 2-week intervals. Outcome was evaluated with the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA; score 0-4), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; score 0-24), and blinded review of clinical photographs (graded on a quartile scale by percent improvement). There were six male and two female patients of mean age 35 years. All underwent at least three treatments. The IGA score improved by 2.5 points at 1 month, 2.7 at 3 months, and 2.2 at 6 months post-treatment, and the DLQI score improved by 7.9, 6.6, and 6.1 points, respectively. Clinical photograph grades improved by 2.9 points at 3 months. Side effects were mild and transient. All patients had some degree of recurrence after 6 months of treatment. The self-administered DL-PDT is easy to perform, moderately effective, and safe to use in patients with CHE. Repeated treatments might be required to maintain remission.


Subject(s)
Eczema , Keratosis, Actinic , Photochemotherapy , Adult , Aminolevulinic Acid/therapeutic use , Eczema/diagnosis , Eczema/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Keratosis, Actinic/drug therapy , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Photosensitizing Agents/adverse effects , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...