The Effect of Treatment Intensification on Other-Cause Mortality in Clear-Cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients.

BACKGROUND: The effect of treatment intensification (systemic therapy [ST] + cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) vs. ST alone) is unknown regarding rates of other-cause mortality (OCM) in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC). We hypothesized that intensified treatment (ST + CN) may result in higher OCM, than when ST is used alone. METHODS: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, all ccmRCC patients treated 2010-2018 either with ST + CN or ST alone were identified. Propensity score matching (PSM), cumulative incidence plots, multivariable competing risks regression analyses and 6 months' landmark analyses addressed OCM and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) according to treatment status. RESULTS: Of 2271 ccmRCC patients, 1233 (54%) were treated with ST + CN vs 1038 (46%) with ST alone. After 1:1 PSM, OCM was 5.3 vs. 4.6 % (P = .5) and CSM was 73.4 vs. 88.4% (P < .001) in ST + CN vs. ST alone patients. In multivariable competing risks regression, the combination of ST and CN was not associated with higher OCM (HR 1.3; 95% CI 0.8-2.1; P = .4), vs. ST alone. However, the combination of ST and CN was independently associated with lower CSM (HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.5-0.6; P < .001), vs. ST alone. After 6 months' landmark analyses, these multivariable associations remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicates no OCM-disadvantage in ST + CN ccmRCC patients, relative to their ST alone counterparts. Conversely, a strong association with lower CSM was recorded in ST + CN patients, relative to their ST alone counterparts. These associations are robust and remained unchanged after strictest statistical adjustment including control for immortal time bias.

A retrospective single-centered, comprehensive targeted genetic sequencing analysis of prognostic survival using tissues from Korean patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after targeted therapy.

PURPOSE: To identify candidate gene mutations to significantly predict the risk of survival prognosis after treatment with systemic first-line targeted therapy (TT) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2017, 168 triplet-tissue block samples from 56 mRCC patients were selected for targeted gene sequencing (TGS). Fifty-six patients' medical records including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at the time of mRCC diagnosis were evaluated. The patients were grouped into favorable (>12 months/>3 years), intermediate (3-12/12-36 months), and poor groups according to their PFS/OS (<3 months/<12 months). We identified any significant therapeutic targeted genes relating to the survival with a significance at p<0.050. RESULTS: The first line therapeutic response showed 1.8% complete remission, 14.2% partial response, 42.9% stable disease, and 41.1% progressive disease. Among the overall TGS results, the cumulative effect of CDH1, and/or PTK2 genes significantly reflected the therapeutic responses in terms of PFS/OS; CDH1 and PTK2 mutations were associated with poor prognostic outcomes (p<0.050). Among only triplet-quality check passed tissues, the SGO2, BRAF, URB1, and NEDD1 mutated genes significantly correlated with OS. Regarding metastasis, patients with liver metastasis had the worst OS (p=0.050). The combinational mutation number from these two candidate genes in the liver metastatic samples with mutated EGFR2 and FABP7 also showed a significantly worse OS than those with other metastatic lesions (p<0.050). CONCLUSIONS: This study reports several significant mutated genes related to the survival prognosis in mRCC patients treated with first-line TT.

Prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil count in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: In recent years, inflammation has become widely recognized as a crucial component in tumor development and progression. Neutrophils are one of the most common inflammatory markers during hematological examinations. The prognostic value of neutrophils in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains inconsistent. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil count in patients with mRCC. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were searched for data on the association between pretreatment neutrophil count and mRCC prognosis up to October 7, 2017. We sorted out relevant studies and extracted the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 13 studies containing 3,021 patients with mRCC were summarized in the present meta-analysis. An elevated pretreatment neutrophil count yielded a worse OS (HR=2.17, 95% CI=1.68-2.79, P<0.001) and PFS (HR=1.78, 95% CI=0.91-3.49, P<0.001). Furthermore, we performed a subgroup analysis based on cut-off value, ethnicity, treatment method and analysis type. As a result, the association between pretreatment neutrophil count and survival was statistically significant in the subgroups of cut-off value, ethnicity, treatment method and analysis type. Conclusion: Our results show that the pretreatment neutrophil count is associated with mRCC outcomes and can be used as a valuable inflammatory marker for prognosis monitoring.

Effect of Concomitant pH-Elevating Medications with Pazopanib on Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pazopanib is an oral tyrosine-kinase inhibitor that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Pharmacokinetic data have shown that concomitant administration of pazopanib and esomeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), leads to decreased area under the curve and thus decreased exposure of pazopanib by 40%. Despite the pharmacokinetic data published to date, the clinical significance and impact on patient outcomes resulting from decreased pazopanib exposure remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, observational, cohort study, 90 patients with mRCC who either received pazopanib in combination with a PPI or histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H2RA; concurrent PPI/H2RA group) or who did not take concurrent pH-elevating medications (no PPI/H2RA group) were compared to determine if there was an impact on progression-free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint, and secondary endpoints, overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS: The differences between the PFS of 9.0 months and OS of 28.0 months for the concomitant PPI/H2RA group versus 11.0 months and 30.1 months, respectively, for the no PPI/H2RA group were not statistically significant. Rates of adverse events were similar between the concomitant PPI/H2RA and no PPI/H2RA groups. CONCLUSION: Concomitant PPI or H2RA usage was not shown to be associated with a reduction in PFS or OS for patients receiving pazopanib for mRCC, with a similar toxicity profile in each group. Based on the results of this retrospective cohort study and the palliative nature of the treatment of patients with mRCC, clinicians should consider allowing patients to remain on concomitant pazopanib and acid-reducing therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Pazopanib is a preferred category-one first-line treatment for predominant clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, because of an aging demographic, coupled with patients with mRCC presenting with multiple comorbidities, including symptomatic dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease, patients are commonly required to take pazopanib concomitantly with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or a histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H2RA). Despite earlier pharmacokinetic reports suggesting that an alkaline pH may result in poorer absorption, this institutional retrospective study found no effect on clinical outcomes. These data suggest that concurrent treatment of mRCC with pazopanib and a PPI or H2RA may be safe in everyday practice.

RECORD-4 multicenter phase 2 trial of second-line everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Asian versus non-Asian population subanalysis.

BACKGROUND: RECORD-4 assessed everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who progressed after 1 prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or cytokine and reinforced the clinical benefit of second-line everolimus. Because of the high percentage of patients from China enrolled in RECORD-4 (41%) and some reported differences in responses to certain targeted agents between Chinese and Western patients, this subanalysis evaluated outcomes in Asian versus non-Asian patients. METHODS: RECORD-4 enrolled patients with clear cell mRCC into 3 cohorts based on prior first-line therapy: sunitinib, other anti-VEGF (sorafenib, bevacizumab, pazopanib, other), or cytokines. Patients received everolimus 10 mg/d until progression of disease (RECIST, v1.0) or intolerance. Primary end point was progression-free survival per investigator review. Data cutoff was Sept 1, 2014. RESULTS: Among Asian (n = 55) versus non-Asian (n = 79) patients, 98% versus 84% had good/intermediate MSKCC prognosis; 73% versus 65% were men, and 85% versus 73% were < 65 years of age. All (100%) Asian patients were of Chinese ethnicity. Median duration of exposure was 5.5 mo for Asian and 6.0 mo for non-Asian patients. Among Asian versus non-Asian patients, median progression-free survival (months) was 7.4 versus 7.8 overall, 7.4 versus 4.0 with prior sunitinib, and 5.7 versus 9.2 with prior other anti-VEGFs. Clinical benefit rate was similar between populations: 74.5% (95% CI 61.0-85.3) for Asian patients and 74.7% (95% CI 63.6-83.8) for non-Asian patients. Most patients achieved stable disease as best overall response (Asian, 63.6%; non-Asian, 69.6%). Overall rate of grade 3/4 adverse events appeared similar for Asian (58%) and non-Asian patients (54%). CONCLUSIONS: This RECORD-4 subanalysis demonstrated comparable efficacy and adverse event profiles of second-line everolimus in Asian and non-Asian patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes by prior therapy should be interpreted with caution because of small patient numbers in some subpopulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Everolimus as Second-line Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell. Carcinoma (RECORD-4); ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01491672 . Registration date: December 14, 2011.

Real-life patterns of use, safety and effectiveness of sunitinib in first-line therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the SANTORIN cohort study.

PURPOSE: To investigate sunitinib in the real-life first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: SANTORIN is a French observational multicentre cohort. Patients initiating sunitinib in first-line mRCC therapy were included (January 2008 to April 2010) and followed for 24 months. Data were collected from medical files. The outcomes were 24-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), response and safety. RESULTS: Three hundred two patients were included: median age, 64.8 years; male, 73.2%; clear cell mRCC, 83.1%; prior nephrectomy, 85.4%; >1 metastatic sites, 64.2%; brain metastases, 6.3%; ECOG-PS ≥ 2, 9.9%. Median duration of first-line therapy with sunitinib was 10.7 months. Initial sunitinib dose was 50 mg/day for 83.4% of patients; dose reduction occurred in 65.2%. Sunitinib was discontinued in 73.2% of the patients: for progression (61.1%), death (31.2%) or adverse events (6.8%). More than half (58.3%) had grade ≥3 adverse events, mainly hypertension (12.6%) and hand-foot syndrome (12.3%). The 24-month OS and PFS rates [95%CI] were 49.5% [43.7;55.0] and 16.4% [12.5;20.9], respectively. Median OS was 23.6 months [20.2;-] and median PFS 8.4 months [7.6;9.9]. Overall best response rate was 31.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this large observational study suggest that effectiveness of sunitinib in first-line mRCC as predicted by clinical trials is maintained in real-life clinical practice. The expected benefit in poor-prognosis patients that were not evaluated in the pivotal clinical trial remains; however, questionable and long-term safety monitoring is still warranted. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Two cases of gallbladder metastasis from renal cell carcinoma and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Renal cell carcinoma accounts for 90% of renal neoplasms and metastatic disease is common. One third of newly diagnosed cases will have synchronous metastases at diagnosis and further 25-50 % will develop metachronous disease. CASE PRESENTATION: This study presents two new cases of gallbladder metastasis from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from our institution and reviews the published literature. The final cohort included 52 evaluable patients. M/F ratio was 2:1 and median age was 62.5 years. Most patients were diagnosed incidentally after follow-up or staging imaging for RCC. Of the patients with available histology, all except one were clear cell type (n = 39) and 92% were polypoid. Thirty-six patients demonstrated metachronous gallbladder metastasis with median disease-free interval (DFI) from nephrectomy of 4 years. The most frequent site of metastasis was the contralateral kidney (46.7%) followed by the pancreas and lung. The median disease-free interval (DFS) after cholecystectomy was 37 months. Three- and five-year OS rates were 74 and 62%, respectively. Age younger than 45 years (p = 0.008) and DFI <24 months (p = 0.049) were associated with decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS: RCC metastasis to the gallbladder is associated with an unusual pattern of concomitant metastasis. Symptoms are not common. Simple cholecystectomy is associated with increased OS and nil local or port site recurrence. Young age and short DFI are associated with decreased OS.

Tumor necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging correlates with aggressive histology and disease progression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to correlate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with the histopathologic features and disease progression. METHODS: Institutional review board approval for this retrospective study was obtained; patient consent was not required. The initial staging MRI scans of 75 patients with histologically confirmed ccRCC were retrospectively reviewed. The imaging was assessed by 2 radiologists for the presence of tumor necrosis, cystic degeneration, intracellular fat, hemorrhage, retroperitoneal collaterals, and renal vein thrombosis. Quantitative analysis for the MRI presence of intracellular lipid within tumors was performed. MRI findings were correlated with histopathologic findings of clear cell percentage, alveolar and tubular growth pattern, and disease progression. Statistical associations were evaluated with nonparametric univariable analyses and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Correlation between MRI and histopathologic features was performed in 75 patients, whereas follow-up data were available for progression analysis in 68 patients. The presence of tumor necrosis, retroperitoneal collaterals, and renal vein thrombosis on MRI was significantly associated with a low percentage of tumor cells with clear cytoplasm (P < .01) and metastatic disease at presentation or disease progression (P < .01). At multivariable analysis, necrosis remained the only feature statistically associated with disease progression (P = .03; adjusted odds ratio, 27.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-554.7 for reader 1 and P = .02; adjusted odds ratio, 29.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-520.8 for reader 2). CONCLUSIONS: Necrosis in ccRCC on MRI correlates with the histopathologic finding of lower percentage of tumor cells with clear cytoplasm and is a poor prognostic indicator irrespective of tumor size.

Everolimus-Induced Interstitial Pneumonitis in a Patient with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Case Report / 대한내과학회지

Everolimus, an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, is an active agent against metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Treatment with everolimus prolongs progression-free survival in patients with clear cell-type renal cell carcinoma that has progressed on vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sunitinib and/or sorafenib. Everolimus-induced interstitial pneumonitis is not rare and is sometimes fatal. Due to the potential for pulmonary toxicity due to everolimus, it is recommended that pulmonary complications be periodically evaluated. We report a case of everolimus-associated interstitial pneumonitis in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.